CIS510 W9 Discussion

CIS510W9A1RUBRIC.docx

Home >Information Systems homework help >CIS510 W9 Discussion

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150	Assignment 4: Diversity of Approaches
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Analyze each reason listed above as a reason for a diversity of approaches to software construction and modeling, and give your opinion on whether or not each reason is valid. Weight: 45%	Did not submit or incompletely analyzed each reason listed above as a reason for a diversity of approaches to software construction and modeling; did not submit or incompletely gave your opinion on whether or not each reason is valid.	Partially analyzed each reason listed above as a reason for a diversity of approaches to software construction and modeling; partially gave your opinion on whether or not each reason is valid.	Satisfactorily analyzed each reason listed above as a reason for a diversity of approaches to software construction and modeling; satisfactorily gave your opinion on whether or not each reason is valid.	Thoroughly analyzed each reason listed above as a reason for a diversity of approaches to software construction and modeling; thoroughly gave your opinion on whether or not each reason is valid.
2. Propose at least one (1) additional reason why you believe such diversity of approaches exists. Provide support for your recommendation. Weight: 40%	Did not submit or incompletely proposed at least one (1) additional reason why you believe such diversity of approaches exists. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your recommendation.	Partially proposed at least one (1) additional reason why you believe such diversity of approaches exists. Partially provided support for your recommendation.	Satisfactorily proposed at least one (1) additional reason why you believe such diversity of approaches exists. Satisfactorily provided support for your recommendation.	Thoroughly proposed at least one (1) additional reason why you believe such diversity of approaches exists. Thoroughly provided support for your recommendation.
3. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided.	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present