CIS510 W4 Assignment Adv Sys Analysis & Design
KupKake
CIS510W4AssignmentRUBRIC.docxCIS510 W4 Assignment RUBRIC
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 150 |
Assignment 2: Creating a Use Case |
|||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia, create a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem. Weight: 35% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Partially created a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Satisfactorily created a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
Thoroughly created a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
|
2a. Provide a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram. |
Partially provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram. |
Satisfactorily provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram. |
Thoroughly provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram. |
|
2b. Provide a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors. |
Partially provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors. |
Satisfactorily provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors. |
Thoroughly provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors. |
|
3. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
