CIS510 W2A1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram

CIS510W2A1RUBRIC.docx

Home >Information Systems homework help >CIS510 W2A1 Error Handling in an Activity Diagram

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150	Assignment 1: Error Handling in an Activity Diagram
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia, update the diagram to include two (2) error-handling pathways. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely updated the diagram to include two (2) error-handling pathways, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Partially updated the diagram to include two (2) error-handling pathways, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Satisfactorily updated the diagram to include two (2) error-handling pathways, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Thoroughly updated the diagram to include two (2) error-handling pathways, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.
2a. Produce a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of the errors being checked. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of the errors being checked.	Partially produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of the errors being checked.	Satisfactorily produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of the errors being checked.	Thoroughly produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of the errors being checked.
2b. Produce a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an explanation of the main reasons why checking for such errors is important. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an explanation of the main reasons why checking for such errors is important.	Partially produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an explanation of the main reasons why checking for such errors is important.	Satisfactorily produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an explanation of the main reasons why checking for such errors is important.	Thoroughly produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an explanation of the main reasons why checking for such errors is important.
2c. Produce a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of other possible errors. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of other possible errors.	Partially produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of other possible errors.	Satisfactorily produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of other possible errors.	Thoroughly produced a narrative which describes the added error-handling pathways that includes an overview of other possible errors.
3. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided.	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present