Week 4 Assignment 2

profileHh Ari
CIS499_Rubric.docx

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 110

Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements

Criteria

 

Unacceptable Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D

 

Fair 70-79% C

 

Proficient 80-89% B

 

Exemplary 90-100% A

Section 1: Business Requirements Document

1ai. Describe and define the scope of the project. Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely described and defined the scope of the project.

Insufficiently described and defined the scope of the project.

Partially described and defined the scope of the project.

Satisfactorily described and defined the scope of the project.

Thoroughly described and defined the scope of the project.

1aii. Speculate as to how to control the scope. Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely speculated as to how to control the scope.

Insufficiently speculated as to how to control the scope.

Partially speculated as to how to control the scope.

Satisfactorily speculated as to how to control the scope.

Thoroughly speculated as to how to control the scope.

1aiii. Identify possible risks, constraints, and assumptions. Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions.

Insufficiently identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions.

Partially identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions.

Satisfactorily identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions.

Thoroughly identified possible risks, constraints, and assumptions.

1aiv. Describe the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure. Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure.

Insufficiently described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure.

Partially described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure.

Satisfactorily described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure.

Thoroughly described the relationship and integration between systems and infrastructure.

1av. Speculate upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs. Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs.

Insufficiently speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs.

Partially speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs.

Satisfactorily speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs.

Thoroughly speculated upon potential outsourcing or offshoring needs.

1avi. Identify and justify the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary. Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary.

Insufficiently identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary.

Partially identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary.

Satisfactorily identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary.

Thoroughly identified and justified the necessary resources including staffing that are necessary.

1avii. Define relevant terms that will be used throughout project. Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project.

Insufficiently defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project.

Partially defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project.

Satisfactorily defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project.

Thoroughly defined relevant terms that will be used throughout project.

1b. 2 references Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Section 2: Revised Project Plan

2. Update the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks.

Insufficiently updated the project plan from Project Deliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) newproject tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks.

Partially updated the project plan from ProjectDeliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) newproject tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks.

Satisfactorily updated the project plan from ProjectDeliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) newproject tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks.

Thoroughly updated the project plan from ProjectDeliverable 1: Project Plan Inception, with three to five (3-5) newproject tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks.

3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present