CIS 443

Points: 100

Assignment 3: Release Planning

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Draw a diagram to highlight the product road map and product life cycle through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely drew a diagram to highlight the product road  map and product life cycle through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Insufficiently drew a diagram to highlight the product road map and product life cycle through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Partially drew a diagram to highlight the product road map and product life cycle through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Satisfactorily drew a diagram to highlight the product road map and product life cycle through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Thoroughly drew a diagram to highlight the product road map and product life cycle through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

2. Provide at least two (2) iterations and twelve (12) tasks related to development on mobile devices through the use of MS Project. Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely provided at least two (2) iterations and twelve (12) tasks related to development on mobile devices through the use of MS Project.

Insufficiently provided at least two (2) iterations and twelve (12) tasks related to development on mobile devices through the use of MS Project.

Partially provided at least two (2) iterations and twelve (12) tasks related to development on mobile devices through the use of MS Project.

Satisfactorily provided at least two (2) iterations and twelve (12) tasks related to development on mobile devices through the use of MS Project.

Thoroughly provided at least two (2) iterations and twelve (12) tasks related to development on mobile devices through the use of MS Project.

3. Suggest strategies on calculating relative value points and monetary value points.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested strategies on calculating relative value points and monetary value points.

Insufficiently suggested strategies on calculating relative value points and monetary value points.

Partially suggested strategies on calculating relative value points and monetary value points.

Satisfactorily suggested strategies on calculating relative value points and monetary value points.

Thoroughly suggested strategies on calculating relative value points and monetary value points.

4. Speculate on the associated risks regarding the development on mobile devices and provide strategies to mitigate those risks. 

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely speculated on the associated risks regarding the development on mobile devices and did not submit or incompletely provided strategies to mitigate those risks. 

Insufficiently speculated on the associated risks regarding the development on mobile devices and insufficiently provided strategies to mitigate those risks. 

Partially speculated on the associated risks regarding the development on mobile devices and partially provided strategies to mitigate those risks. 

Satisfactorily speculated on the associated risks regarding the development on mobile devices and satisfactorily provided strategies to mitigate those risks. 

Thoroughly speculated on the associated risks regarding the development on mobile devices and thoroughly provided strategies to mitigate those risks. 

5. Provide at least one (1) example of maintenance stories based on the context of the project.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely provided at least one (1) example of maintenance stories based on the context of the project.

Insufficiently provided at least one (1) example of maintenance stories based on the context of the project.

Partially provided at least one (1) example of maintenance stories based on the context of the project.

Satisfactorily provided at least one (1) example of maintenance stories based on the context of the project.

Thoroughly provided at least one (1) example of maintenance stories based on the context of the project.

6. Provide at least one (1) example of performance cards based on the context of the project.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely provided at least one (1) example of performance cards based on the context of the project.

Insufficiently provided at least one (1) example of performance cards based on the context of the project.

Partially provided at least one (1) example of performance cards based on the context of the project.

Satisfactorily provided at least one (1) example of performance cards based on the context of the project.

Thoroughly provided at least one (1) example of performance cards based on the context of the project.

7. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present