CIS 353

Points: 120

Assignment 3: Design with UML

Criteria

 Unacceptable Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D

  Fair 70-79% C

  Proficient 80-89% B

  Exemplary 90-100% A

1. Create a package diagram of the problem domain layer using the communication diagrams and the CRUDE matrix through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely created a package diagram of the problem domain layer using the communication diagrams and the CRUDE matrix through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Insufficiently created a package diagram of the problem domain layer using the communication diagrams and the CRUDE matrix through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Partially created a package diagram of the problem domain layer using the communication diagrams and the CRUDE matrix through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Satisfactorily created a package diagram of the problem domain layer using the communication diagrams and the CRUDE matrix through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Thoroughly created a package diagram of the problem domain layer using the communication diagrams and the CRUDE matrix through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

2. Perform and explain the verification and validation walk-through of the package diagram. Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely performed and did not submit or incompletely explained the verification and validation walk-through of the package diagram.

Insufficiently performed and insufficiently explained the verification and validation walk-through of the package diagram.

Partially performed and partially explained the verification and validation walk-through of the package diagram.

Satisfactorily performed and satisfactorily explained the verification and validation walk-through of the package diagram.

Thoroughly performed and thoroughly explained the verification and validation walk-through of the package diagram.

3. Create a set of invariants for attributes and relationships and add them to the CRC cards for each class in the structural model using Object Constraint Language (OCL). Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely created a set of invariants for attributes and relationships and did not submit or incompletely added them to the CRC cards for each class in the structural model using Object Constraint Language (OCL).

Insufficiently created a set of invariants for attributes and relationships and insufficiently added them to the CRC cards for each class in the structural model using Object Constraint Language (OCL).

Partially created a set of invariants for attributes and relationships and partially added them to the CRC cards for each class in the structural model using Object Constraint Language (OCL).

Satisfactorily created a set of invariants for attributes and relationships and satisfactorily added them to the CRC cards for each class in the structural model using Object Constraint Language (OCL).

Thoroughly created a set of invariants for attributes and relationships and thoroughly added them to the CRC cards for each class in the structural model using Object Constraint Language (OCL).

4. List the classes in the structure model. Choose one (1) class and create a contract for each method in that class. Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely listed the classes in the structure model; did not submit or incompletely chose one (1) class and did not submit or incompletely created a contract for each method in that class.

Insufficiently listed the classes in the structure model; insufficiently chose one (1) class and insufficiently created a contract for each method in that class.

Partially listed the classes in the structure model; partially chose one (1) class and partially created a contract for each method in that class.

Satisfactorily listed the classes in the structure model; satisfactorily chose one (1) class and satisfactorily created a contract for each method in that class.

Thoroughly listed the classes in the structure model; thoroughly chose one (1) class and thoroughly created a contract for each method in that class.

5. Create a method specification for each method using both structured English and activity diagram for the algorithm specification through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely created a method specification for each method using both structured English and activity diagram for the algorithm specification through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Insufficiently created a method specification for each method using both structured English and activity diagram for the algorithm specification through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Partially created a method specification for each method using both structured English and activity diagram for the algorithm specification through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Satisfactorily created a method specification for each method using both structured English and activity diagram for the algorithm specification through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Thoroughly created a method specification for each method using both structured English and activity diagram for the algorithm specification through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

6. 2 references Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present