Hey can someone have this paper done by 11:59?
O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E
Increasing Burden of Chronic Liver Disease Among Adolescents and Young Adults in the USA: A Silent Epidemic
Iliana Doycheva1 • Kymberly D. Watt2 • Ghassoub Rifai3 • Rachel Abou Mrad3 •
Rocio Lopez4 • Nizar N. Zein3 • William D. Carey3 • Naim Alkhouri3,5
Received: 18 November 2016 / Accepted: 6 February 2017 / Published online: 13 February 2017
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017
Abstract
Background and Aims Chronic liver disease (CLD) starts
or becomes established in the adolescent and young adult
(AYA) age group. This study aimed to estimate trends in
CLD prevalence among US AYAs and to assess factors
associated with CLD.
Methods Cross-sectional data from 14,547 AYAs (popu-
lation-weighted N = 68,274,386) aged 15–39 years enrol-
led in the National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey from 1988 to 2012 were used. Nonalcoholic fatty
liver disease (NAFLD) was defined as elevated alanine
aminotransferase ([19 U/L for females and [30 U/L for males) in subjects with BMI C 25 kg/m
2 ; alcoholic liver
disease (ALD) as excessive alcohol use (C3 drinks/day for
men and C2 drinks/day for women) and elevated amino-
transferases after excluding alternative etiologies.
Participants were considered hepatitis C virus (HCV)
positive if antibody to HCV and HCV-RNA was positive.
Results There was a sharp increase in the prevalence of
CLD from 12.9% in 1988–1994 to 28.5% in 1999–2004
that remained stable after that (27.7%). NAFLD was the
most common etiology accounting for 22% of all CLD in
the later period. The prevalence of ALD has been steadily
increasing throughout the years, while HCV has been
decreasing. On multivariate analysis, being overweight/
obese, Mexican–American ethnicity, later study period,
older age, and male gender, were associated with higher
odds of having CLD.
Conclusion More than one quarter of US AYAs might be
affected by CLD. CLD prevalence in this age group has
more than doubled over the past three decades mainly due
to rise in NAFLD prevalence.
Keywords Young population � Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease � Obesity � Alcoholic liver disease � Hepatitis CElectronic supplementary material The online version of this
article (doi:10.1007/s10620-017-4492-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
& Naim Alkhouri [email protected]
Iliana Doycheva
Kymberly D. Watt
Ghassoub Rifai
Rachel Abou Mrad
Rocio Lopez
Nizar N. Zein
William D. Carey
1 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical
University, Sofia, Bulgaria
2 Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN, USA
3 Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH,
USA
4 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research
Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
5 Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital, 9500 Euclid Avenue,
A-111, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
123
Dig Dis Sci (2017) 62:1373–1380
DOI 10.1007/s10620-017-4492-3
Abbreviations
ALD Alcoholic liver disease
ALT Alanine aminotransferase
AST Aspartate aminotransferase
AYA Adolescent and young adult
BMI Body mass index
CI Confidence interval
CLD Chronic liver disease
HCV Hepatitis C virus
IDU Injection drug user
NAFLD Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey
OR Odds ratio
Introduction
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 15–39 years
constitute approximately one-third of the American popu-
lation equating over 103 million people [1]. Risk factors
arising during these years of age have a great impact for
development of chronic liver disease (CLD) and its pro-
gression later in life. Among the most important ones is
obesity that remains high (34% of young adults aged
20–39 years) [2] mainly due to unhealthy diet and
decreased physical activity and plays a pivotal role for
development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
High prevalence of binge and heavy drinking in youth and
college students [3] can eventually lead to development of
alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and accelerates progression
of CLD with alternative etiologies. Despite noted decline
in the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
among injection drug users (IDUs) aged \39 years between 1998 and 2008 [4], more recent data for the period
2006–2012 indicate an alarming overall increase in acute
HCV infection in young IDUs (B30 years age), especially
among white residents of nonurban areas [5, 6].
Acquisition and progression of CLD in AYAs is largely
underestimated and often remains unrecognized. Young
persons are less likely to seek medical care, often lack
health insurance, and are unaware of risks of CLD and
available preventive programs. This leads to delayed
diagnosis and lack of timely management and predisposes
AYAs to silent progression, eventually resulting in
advanced liver disease in middle and late-middle age. This
could be one of the reasons for the highest mortality rate
from CLD and cirrhosis in 55- to 64-year-old persons over
the last decade [7]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was
to estimate changes in overall CLD prevalence among US
AYAs over the past three decades and trends in the
prevalence of its major etiologies: NAFLD, ALD, and
HCV. We also aimed to determine risk factors associated
with CLD in AYAs.
Methods
Study Design and Study Cohort
This is a cross-sectional analysis of nationally representa-
tive data for subjects who were 15–39 years old at the time
of enrollment in the National Health and Nutrition Exam-
ination Survey (NHANES) III 1988–1994 and continuous
NHANES 1999–2012. The NHANES is an ongoing, pop-
ulation-based health and nutrition survey of the civilian,
noninstitutionalized US population. The methods and study
design of NHANES have been previously described [8].
For analyses purposes, cycles were grouped into three
periods: 1988–1994, 1999–2004, and 2007–2012. Partici-
pants were excluded if there was missing information on
alcohol use, hepatitis B or hepatitis C status, body mass
index (BMI), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate
aminotransferase (AST), or lack of information on hepa-
totoxic medications use (Supplementary Table 1).
Definitions
NAFLD was defined as elevated ALT ([19 U/L for females and [30 U/L for males) in subjects with BMI C 25 kg/m
2 in the absence of chronic viral hepatitis
(B or C) and lack of excessive alcohol use and hepatotoxic
medications (steroids, lipid-lowering or antituberculous
drugs used for prevention or treatment). ALD was defined
as excessive alcohol use (C3 drinks/day for men and C2
drinks/day for women in the past year) and elevated ALT
or AST ([31 U/L for females and [37 U/L for males) in the absence of viral hepatitis (B or C) and no hepatotoxic
medications. Average daily alcohol consumption was cal-
culated using the formula: average number of drinks on
drinking days 9 average number of drinking days over the
past year/365. Diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) was
accepted if the participant had positive hepatitis B surface
antigen (HBsAg). If hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV Ab)
was indeterminate or positive, then HCV-RNA was
checked and if positive, participant was considered to have
HCV infection.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean or percentage ± standard error.
Regression analysis was used to assess trends across the
different time periods. Linear and polynomial regression
1374 Dig Dis Sci (2017) 62:1373–1380
123
was assessed, and the most appropriate functional form for
the trend was assessed by examination of regression
diagnostic plots. In addition, logistic regression analysis
was used to determine factors associated with CLD and to
evaluate risk over time. All analyses were performed using
SAS survey procedures (version 9.4, The SAS Institute,
Cary, NC), which account for the complex sampling design
of NHANES and appropriately weight participants in sta-
tistical models. Since we combined different NHANES
cycles, combined weights were calculated following the
instructions provided in the NHANES analytic guidelines
[9].
Results
Participant Characteristics
A total of 14,547 participants (population-weighted
N = 68,274,386) for all three periods were included in the
study. Table 1 summarizes demographic and clinical
characteristics of the included subjects (Table 1).
There was no significant difference in age, gender, and
excessive alcohol use between the study periods, but pos-
itive trend in increasing BMI and higher proportion of
overweight, obese, and severely obese subjects were noted
over the course of three periods. For example, the mean
BMI in the first period from 1988 to 1994 was
25.5 ± 0.15 kg/m 2
compared to 27.8 ± 0.16 kg/m 2
(P \ 0.001) for the last period from 2007 to 2012. Simi- larly, the prevalence of obesity in the first period was at
17% compared to 29.8% in the last period.
Prevalence of Chronic Liver Disease in AYAs
There was a steep rise in the overall prevalence of CLD in
AYAs from 1988–1994 to 1999–2004 [12.9%; 95% con-
fidence interval (CI), 10.5–15.2 to 28.5%; 95% CI
26.6–30.4%] that subsequently leveled off in the
2007–2012 period (27.7%; 95% CI 25.7–29.6%) (Fig. 1).
NAFLD was by far the most common etiology of CLD
accounting for 22.2% (95% CI 20.3–24.1%) of all CLD in
the last period and showing the same pattern of increase as
total CLD. In comparison, ALD has been slowly and
steadily increasing throughout the years, affecting 5.1% of
AYAs in 2007–2012 period, while HCV has significantly
decreased from 1.8 to 0.36% between the first and last
periods. The overall prevalence of HBV was very low
(0.1%) among AYAs, and this was the reason we did not
include in further analyses.
On stratified analyses, similar trends of increase for
overall CLD, NAFLD, and ALD and decrease in HCV
were observed among both sexes, all ethnic groups, and in
overweight and obese subjects, except stable ALD in non-
Hispanic Black participants and not statistically significant
decrease in HCV in non-Hispanic Whites (Table 2).
Additionally, there was no change in CLD, NAFLD, and
ALD prevalence among severely obese subjects.
The prevalence of CLD among young Mexican–Amer-
icans was 41.1% in the latest period. Similar to the entire
cohort, NAFLD and ALD increased and HCV decreased in
this cohort (Supplementary Table 2). The prevalence of
NAFLD has more than doubled over the studied periods
(from 15.4% in 1988–1994 to 33.5% in 2007–2012,
P \ 0.001) and paralleled the increased rate of overweight/ obesity in this subgroup. There was no association between
age, gender, and being overweight/obese and CLD across
periods (P [ 0.15 for all).
Risk Factors for Chronic Liver Disease in AYAs
On multivariate logistic regression analysis, being over-
weight or obese was the strongest predictor of CLD diag-
nosis [odds ratio (OR) 13.6; 95% CI 11.2–16.5].
Participants in later study periods (1999–2004 and
2007–2012) had a twofold increase in the risk of having
CLD compared to participants in the earlier study period
(1988–1994). In terms of ethnicity and compared to Cau-
casians, being Mexican–American was associated with an
increased risk of CLD (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3–1.8,
P \ 0.001) while being non-Hispanic Black seemed pro- tective (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.56–0.73), P \ 0.001). Other risk factors for CLD in AYAs were male gender and older
age (Table 3).
Subgroup analyses by gender, weight, and ethnicity
demonstrated the same risk factors for CLD with the
exception of subjects with normal weight where older age
was the only risk factor and male gender seemed protective
(Supplementary Table 3). Among White participants, older
age and male gender were not risk factors.
Discussion
In this study, we have used the nationally representative
data of NHANES to estimate the prevalence and analyze
trends of overall CLD and its major etiologies in US AYAs
over the last three decades. We found that more than one
quarter of AYAs might be affected by CLD and the
prevalence has more than doubled over the past three
decades. This increase is mainly due and mirrors a steep
rise of NAFLD in this age group.
Over the last decades, the surge in obesity and metabolic
syndrome in all age groups played a key role for NAFLD
development and expectedly was the leading etiology of
CLD in our study. Potential major contributors for this
Dig Dis Sci (2017) 62:1373–1380 1375
123
finding were the significant increase in overweight and
obese subjects over the three studied NHANES periods and
twice as high proportion of Mexican–American partici-
pants (that also included all persons of Hispanic ethnicity
for the 2007–2010 study period) [9] in the last compared to
first period. Similarly, a 2.5-fold increase in NAFLD
prevalence among subjects 18–35 years old (9.6% in
1988–1994 to 24% in 2005–2010) was demonstrated in a
recent analysis using the same definition of NAFLD [10].
Notably, cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis has
progressively risen from 2001 to 2012 as an indication for
liver transplantation in young adults \40 years [11] and has become the second most common indication for liver
transplantation in all US adults [12]. In addition to liver-
related complications, NAFLD in young people has been
associated with a variety of metabolic and cardiovascular
abnormalities that could potentially increase their risk of
cardiovascular morbidity and mortality later in life [13].
We have observed a stable CLD prevalence over the
latter two time periods, which likely reflects the steady
NAFLD prevalence during these years. A possible expla-
nation is the raised concern of growing obesity epidemic in
the USA at the beginning of the twenty-first century [14]
and ensuing development of several health initiatives:
labeling of food products, decreased portion sizes, addi-
tional taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages, and price
incentive on healthy food [15]. Given the greatest weight
gain among AYAs was observed at the age of early to mid-
twenties [16], the Early Adult Reduction of weight through
LifestYle intervention (EARLY) Trials for AYAs 18–35 of
age was funded in 2009 [17]. Additionally, between 2000
and 2010, a greater than 40% increase was noted in adults
that had been advised by their physician to exercise or do
other physical activity as part of the Healthy People 2020
goals [18].
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants by NHANES period
Characteristics 1988–1994 1999–2004 2007–2012 P value trend
n = 23,884,136 n = 22,071,277 n = 22,318,973
Age (years) 28.9 ± 0.18 29.7 ± 0.17 28.9 ± 0.18 0.77
Male 12,366,883 (51.8) 11,105,983 (50.3) 11,509,320 (51.6) 0.82
Race
White (non-Hispanic) 18,071,915 (75.7) 14,582,811 (66.1) 13,435,450 (60.2) \0.001 Black (non-Hispanic) 2,604,988 (10.9) 2,566,016 (11.6) 2,693,674 (12.1) 0.39
Mexican–American 1,534,358 (6.4) 2,439,629 (11.1) 2,747,971 (12.3) \0.001 Other race 1,672,874 (7.0) 2,482,821 (11.2) 3,441,878 (15.4) \0.001 BMI (kg/m
2 ) 25.5 ± 0.15 27.3 ± 0.14 27.8 ± 0.16 \0.001
Overweight a
10,743,585 (45.0) 12,649,334 (57.3) 13,514,767 (60.6) \0.001 Obese
a 4,053,499 (17.0) 5,937,754 (26.9) 6,642,869 (29.8) \0.001
Severely obese a
491,571 (2.1) 1,059,136 (4.8) 1,242,429 (5.6) \0.001 Avg. daily alcohol consumption 0.68 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.03 0.52 ± 0.02 \0.001 Excessive alcohol use 3,902,364 (16.3) 2,394,244 (10.8) 3,136,496 (14.1) 0.063
ALT (U/L) 18.5 ± 0.46 26.5 ± 0.72 25.5 ± 0.32 \0.001 AST (U/L) 21.2 ± 0.21 23.9 ± 0.31 24.6 ± 0.20 \0.001
Values presented as mean ± standard error or weighted frequency (%)
ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, BMI body mass index a
Overweight was defined as BMI of 25–29.9 kg/m 2 ; obese—BMI of 30–39.9 kg/m
2 ; severely obese—BMI C 40 kg/m
2
Fig. 1 Trends in overall CLD prevalence and its major etiologies among US AYAs, NHANES III 1988–1994 to NHANES 1999–2004,
and NHANES 2007–2012. The estimated prevalence in % is
presented above each bar. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence
intervals
1376 Dig Dis Sci (2017) 62:1373–1380
123
Binge drinking is the most common pattern of alcohol
use among US adolescents and young adults 18–25 years
[3], which puts them at risk of becoming heavy drinkers
later in life and subsequently to develop ALD [19].
Although a linear decrease in current alcohol use in youth
has been noted from 1991 to 2015 [3], we observed a
steady, continuous rise of ALD prevalence in AYAs over
the last two decades, which might be reflecting the con-
sequences of previous higher use. Likewise, in the general
population, a 45% increase in ALD as an indication for LT
Table 2 CLD prevalence among AYAs in the three
studied NHANES periods
Characteristics 1988–1994 1999–2004 2007–2012 P value trend
CLD (HCV, ALD and NAFLD)
All AYAs 12.9 (10.5–15.2) 28.5 (26.6–30.4) 27.7 (25.7–29.6) \0.001 Male 15.2 (11.9–18.4) 30.9 (28.2–33.6) 30.2 (27.8–32.7) \0.001 Female 10.4 (8.2–12.6) 26.1 (23.9–28.2) 24.9 (22.5–27.3) \0.001 White (non-Hispanic) 12.0 (9.1–14.8) 28.1 (25.4–30.7) 26.6 (23.9–29.4) \0.001 Black (non-Hispanic) 13.8 (12.1–15.5) 22.8 (19.8–25.8) 20.0 (17.3–22.6) \0.001 Mexican–American 21.6 (18.3–24.9) 39.4 (35.7–43.1) 41.1 (37.4–44.9) \0.001 Overweight 24.2 (20.7–27.7) 46.4 (43.9–49.0) 42.8 (40.5–45.1) \0.001 Obese 31.7 (27.0–36.5) 52.6 (49.3–55.9) 52.1 (48.5–55.7) \0.001 Severely obese 49.6 (35.7–63.5) 57.1 (48.8–65.4) 57.3 (48.8–65.7) 0.4
NAFLD
All AYAs 8.8 (7.2–10.3) 23.5 (22.0–25.0) 22.2 (20.3–24.1) \0.001 Male 10.6 (8.5–12.7) 26.6 (24.3–28.9) 26.0 (23.8–28.3) \0.001 Female 6.8 (5.2–8.4) 20.3 (18.4–22.2) 18.1 (15.7–20.6) \0.001 White (non-Hispanic) 8.4 (6.4–10.4) 22.3 (20.3–24.4) 20.7 (18.2–23.2) \0.001 Black (non-Hispanic) 7.9 (6.5–9.2) 19.4 (16.8–21.9) 17.3 (14.7–19.9) \0.001 Mexican–American 15.4 (12.8–17.9) 34.9 (31.8–38.0) 33.5 (30.3–36.8) \0.001 Overweight 19.5 (16.6–22.4) 41.0 (38.7–43.2) 36.7 (34.5–38.9) \0.001 Obese 25.9 (21.6–30.3) 46.8 (43.6–50.1) 45.5 (41.8–49.2) \0.001 Severely obese 40.2 (27.1–53.3) 52.9 (44.1–61.7) 50.3 (42.3–58.2) 0.31
ALD
All AYAs 2.30 (1.50–3.10) 4.40 (3.50–5.40) 5.10 (4.20–5.90) \0.001 Male 2.00 (1.03–2.90) 3.50 (2.40–4.50) 3.80 (2.90–4.70) 0.006
Female 2.70 (1.60–3.80) 5.40 (3.80–7.00) 6.50 (5.20–7.70) \0.001 White (non-Hispanic) 2.20 (1.30–3.10) 5.10 (3.80–6.50) 5.40 (4.20–6.70) \0.001 Black (non-Hispanic) 2.40 (1.60–3.20) 2.30 (1.10–3.40) 2.50 (1.50–3.40) 0.94
Mexican–American 4.10 (2.90–5.30) 3.80 (2.50–5.10) 7.50 (6.10–8.90) \0.001 Overweight 3.40 (2.20–4.60) 4.90 (3.80–6.00) 5.90 (4.80–6.90) 0.004
Obese 3.90 (2.20–5.60) 5.20 (3.30–7.00) 6.40 (5.10–7.70) 0.02
Severely obese 9.40 (1.90–17.0) 4.20 (0.60–7.80) 7.00 (4.10–9.90) 0.8
HCV
All adolescents 1.80 (1.04–2.50) 0.62 (0.40–0.84) 0.36 (0.12–0.60) \0.001 Male 2.60 (1.40–3.80) 0.86 (0.44–1.30) 0.42 (0.10–0.75) 0.001
Female 0.89 (0.45–1.30) 0.38 (0.07–0.70) 0.29 (0.05–0.53) 0.019
White (non-Hispanic) 1.40 (0.56–2.30) 0.59 (0.34–0.84) 0.50 (0.09–0.91) 0.061
Black (non-Hispanic) 3.50 (2.40–4.60) 1.20 (0.14–2.20) 0.18 (0.00–0.43) \0.001 Mexican–American 2.10 (1.30–2.90) 0.67 (0.00–1.40) 0.11 (0.00–0.32) \0.001 Overweight 1.30 (0.86–1.70) 0.57 (0.21–0.93) 0.26 (0.08–0.43) \0.001 Obese 1.90 (0.83–3.00) 0.59 (0.05–1.10) 0.23 (0.06–0.40) 0.002
Severely obese 0.00 0.00 0.00 –
Prevalence presented as % (95% confidence interval)
ALD alcoholic liver disease, CLD chronic liver disease, HCV hepatitis C virus, NAFLD nonalcoholic fatty
liver disease
Dig Dis Sci (2017) 62:1373–1380 1377
123
was noted over the last decade [12]. Similarly to NAFLD,
ALD has been also associated with increased liver-related
mortality, but does not affect overall and cardiovascular
mortality [20].
In concordance with decreasing prevalence of anti-HCV
in the general US population [21], our study also found a
significant decline of HCV in AYAs (1.8% in 1988–1994
to 0.36% in 2007–2010). Given that injection drug use is
the most important risk factor for acquisition of HCV, our
result could be explained with the observed trend of
reduced HCV prevalence and incidence among IDUs in the
period spanning from 1998 to 2008 [4]. The introduction of
widely available syringe and needle exchange programs
and opiate substitution treatment likely contributed for that.
However, these results should not ease our concern
regarding HCV burden in AYAs as more recent data have
demonstrated an alarming rising incidence of HCV infec-
tion in young IDUs B30 years in 2006–2012 period [5].
The same trend of steep rise of acute HCV in AYAs was
noted between 2010 and 2014 [6, 22]. Additionally, a
recent analysis demonstrated a 22% increase in HCV
detection in women of childbearing age [23]. The change
in demographic composition of young IDUs, sharing drug
preparation equipment as main factor for transmission,
increasing prescription opioid misuse with subsequent
transitioning to heroin use, and difficulties to engage young
people in preventive programs and behavioral interventions
are now the most important problems [24]. These data in
conjunction with low awareness of HCV status among
young IDUs [25] predict an upsurge of HCV prevalence in
the future.
The risk factors for CLD identified in our study mirror
those associated with increased NAFLD risk in adolescents
[26] and AYAs [10] and again emphasize the predomi-
nance of NAFLD in this age group. Our results
demonstrated almost 14-fold higher odds of CLD in sub-
jects with increased BMI. This finding is of utmost
importance in light of growing evidence on the role of BMI
for overall and liver-related mortality later in life. In a large
cohort of over 2 million Israeli adolescents, higher BMI
during teenage years, even within reference range was
associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular
mortality in mid-adulthood [27]. Furthermore, adolescents
with BMI C 25 kg/m 2
and weight gain during early
adulthood (18–35 years) carried the highest mortality risk
when compared to those who gain weight later in life [28].
Recent longitudinal study also highlighted the key role of
BMI in young subjects and showed that being overweight
in late adolescence predisposes to development of severe
liver disease later in life even after adjustment for alcohol
use [29]. Notably, obesity in early adulthood (mid-20 s to
mid-40 s) was associated with more than twofold increased
risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.4–4.4)
at an earlier age than commonly seen, regardless of well-
established risk factors [30].
Of great importance is also the increased risk of CLD
among AYAs with Mexican–American ethnicity as young
people represent a high proportion of the Hispanic popu-
lation that is projected to double in number by 2060 [31].
In accordance with previous studies in middle-aged adults
[32, 33], we also found the highest NAFLD prevalence in
this subgroup.
The main strength of our study is that it analyzes CLD in
US AYAs based on a large, nation-representative, popu-
lation-based sample and adds to our knowledge of the
estimated prevalence of CLD and its major etiologies in
this age group. However, some limitations should be
acknowledged. First, the cross-sectional design of
NHANES precludes causal inferences. Second, NAFLD
and ALD are likely underdiagnosed as ALT is an imprecise
marker for diagnosis of NAFLD that cannot differentiate
between NAFLD and NASH [34] and young population
tends to underreport heavy alcohol intake [35]. It is also
important to recognize that our definition of NAFLD could
have missed lean NAFLD subjects, especially as it has
been shown they are younger than those with overweight/
obese NAFLD [36]. Lastly, although NAFLD is the most
common explanation for elevated ALT in overweight/
obese AYAs, we might have captured individuals with
alternative etiologies. In support of this, a pediatric study
that used elevated ALT for detection of suspected NAFLD
in overweight/obese children encountered that 18% of
those referred for further evaluation and 24% of those who
were biopsied had liver disease other than NAFLD [37].
Currently, CLD and cirrhosis are the seventh cause of
death in the age group 25–44 years and rank fifth in the
population 45–64 years [7]. CLD has also shown the
highest inpatient mortality [38]. Importantly, it has been
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of risk factors for CLD among AYAs
Variable OR (95% CI) P value
Age (per 5 year) 1.10 (1.05–1.20) \0.001 Male versus female 1.20 (1.07–1.30) \0.001 Overweight or obese 13.60 (11.20–16.50) \0.001 Race
White
Black (non-Hispanic) 0.64 (0.56–0.73) \0.001 Mexican–American 1.60 (1.30–1.80) \0.001 Other race 0.98 (0.81–1.20) 0.87
Study year
1988–1994
1999–2004 2.40 (1.90–3.10) \0.001 2007–2012 2.10 (1.70–2.70) \0.001
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
1378 Dig Dis Sci (2017) 62:1373–1380
123
associated with impaired quality of life and incurs a con-
siderable economic burden [39]. These facts in conjunction
with the results of our study prompt immediate measures
toward increased awareness of rising CLD among AYAs
and require collaborative efforts for implementation of
effective prevention programs. Future research should
focus on distinctive features of CLD in AYAs that would
help us stratify young people at highest risk of CLD and
introduce timely management strategies.
Author’s contributions ID involved in interpretation of data. RL performed statistical analysis. NA involved in study concept and
design, data analysis and interpretation. ID, NA drafting of the
manuscript. KW, GR, RAM, NNZ, WC, RL, NA performed critical
revision of the manuscript. ID, KW, GR, RAM, NNZ, WC, RL, NA
approved final submission.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. United States Census Bureau. Estimates of U.S. Population by
Age and Sex: April 1, 2010, to July 1, 2015. Available at: http://
factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.
xhtml?src=bkmk. Accessed October 31, 2016.
2. Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden
CL. Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to
2014. JAMA. 2016;315:2284–2291.
3. Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al. Youth risk behavior
surveillance—United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ.
2016;65:1–174.
4. Mehta SH, Astemborski J, Kirk GD, et al. Changes in blood-
borne infection risk among injection drug users. J Infect Dis.
2011;203:587–594.
5. Suryaprasad AG, White JZ, Xu F, et al. Emerging epidemic of
hepatitis C virus infections among young nonurban persons who
inject drugs in the United States, 2006–2012. Clin Infect Dis.
2014;59:1411–1419.
6. Zibbell JE, Iqbal K, Patel RC, et al. Increases in hepatitis C virus
infection related to injection drug use among persons aged \/ =30 years—Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia,
2006–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:453–458.
7. Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep.
2016;65:1–95.
8. CDC. NCHS. Key concepts about NHANES survey design.
Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/Nhanes/Survey
Design/SampleDesign/Info1.htm. Accessed October 31, 2016.
9. Johnson CL, Paulose-Ram R, Ogden CL, et al. National health and
nutrition examination survey: analytic guidelines, 1999–2010.
Vital Health Stat.. 2013;2:1–24.
10. Mrad RA, Merjaneh N, Mubarak G, Lopez R, Zein NN, Alkhouri
N. The increasing burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
among young adults in the United States: a growing epidemic
[Letter to the Editor]. Hepatology. 2016;64:1386–1387.
11. Alkhouri N, Hanouneh IA, Zein NN, et al. Liver transplantation
for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in young patients. Transpl Int.
2016;29:418–424.
12. Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohep-
atitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults
awaiting liver transplantation in the United States. Gastroen-
terology. 2015;148:547–555.
13. Singh GK, Vitola BE, Holland MR, et al. Alterations in ven-
tricular structure and function in obese adolescents with nonal-
coholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr. 2013;162:1160–1168, 1168
e1161.
14. Office of the Surgeon General (US), Office of Disease Prevention
and Health Promotion (US), Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (US), National Institutes of Health (US). The surgeon
general’s call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and
obesity. Rockville (MD): Office of the Surgeon General (US);
2001. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK44206/.
15. Hurt RT, Kulisek C, Buchanan LA, McClave SA. The obesity
epidemic: challenges, health initiatives, and implications for
gastroenterologists. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2010;6:
780–792.
16. Lewis CE, Jacobs DR Jr, McCreath H, et al. Weight gain con-
tinues in the 1990s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from
the CARDIA study. Coronary artery risk development in young
adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:1172–1181.
17. Lytle LA, Svetkey LP, Patrick K, et al. The EARLY trials: a
consortium of studies targeting weight control in young adults.
Transl Behav Med. 2014;4:304–313.
18. Barnes PM, Schoenborn CA. Trends in adults receiving a rec-
ommendation for exercise or other physical activity from a
physician or other health professional. NCHS Data Brief. 2012;
1–8.
19. Mathurin P, Deltenre P. Effect of binge drinking on the liver: an
alarming public health issue? Gut. 2009;58:613–617.
20. Trimble G, Zheng L, Mishra A, Kalwaney S, Mir HM, Younossi
ZM. Mortality associated with alcohol-related liver disease. Ali- ment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:596–602.
21. Denniston MM, Jiles RB, Drobeniuc J, et al. Chronic hepatitis C
virus infection in the United States, National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey 2003 to 2010. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:
293–300.
22. CDC. Surveillance for Viral Hepatitis—United States, 2014.
Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/statistics/2014surveil
lance/index.htm. Page last updated: June 22, 2016. Accessed
October 31, 2016.
23. Koneru A, Nelson N, Hariri S, et al. Increased hepatitis C virus
(HCV) detection in women of childbearing age and potential risk
for vertical transmission—United States and Kentucky, 2011–2014.
Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:705–710.
24. Hepatitis C virus infection in young persons who inject drugs.
Consultation Report. February 26–27, 2013. https://www.aids.
gov/pdf/hcv-and-young-pwid-consultation-report.pdf. Accessed
January 3, 2017.
25. Hagan H, Campbell J, Thiede H, et al. Self-reported hepatitis C
virus antibody status and risk behavior in young injectors. Public
Health Rep. 2006;121:710–719.
26. Welsh JA, Karpen S, Vos MB. Increasing prevalence of nonal-
coholic fatty liver disease among United States adolescents,
1988–1994 to 2007–2010. J Pediatr. 2013;162(496–500):e491.
27. Twig G, Yaniv G, Levine H, et al. Body-Mass Index in 2.3
million adolescents and cardiovascular death in adulthood. N
Engl J Med. 2016;374:2430–2440.
28. Adams KF, Leitzmann MF, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Body mass
and weight change in adults in relation to mortality risk. Am J
Epidemiol. 2014;179:135–144.
29. Hagstrom H, Stal P, Hultcrantz R, Hemmingsson T, Andreasson
A. Overweight in late adolescence predicts development of
Dig Dis Sci (2017) 62:1373–1380 1379
123
severe liver disease later in life: A 39 years follow-up study. J
Hepatol. 2016;65:363–368.
30. Hassan MM, Abdel-Wahab R, Kaseb A, et al. Obesity early in
adulthood increases risk but does not affect outcomes of hepa-
tocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:119–129.
31. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of
the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060. Current Population Reports,
P25-1143, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, 2014.
32. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, et al. Prevalence of
hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States:
impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387–1395.
33. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonal-
coholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among
a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver
biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:
124–131.
34. Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Clark JM, Bass NM, et al. Clinical,
laboratory and histological associations in adults with nonalco-
holic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52:913–924.
35. Northcote J, Livingston M. Accuracy of self-reported drinking:
observational verification of ‘last occasion’ drink estimates of
young adults. Alcohol Alcohol. 2011;46:709–713.
36. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Negro F, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty
liver disease in lean individuals in the United States. Medicine
(Baltimore). 2012;91:319–327.
37. Schwimmer JB, Newton KP, Awai HI, et al. Paediatric gas-
troenterology evaluation of overweight and obese children
referred from primary care for suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:1267–1277.
38. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, et al. Burden of gastroin-
testinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States.
Gastroenterology. 2015;149(1731–1741):e1733.
39. Stepanova M, De Avila L, Afendy M, et al. Direct and indirect
economic burden of chronic liver disease in the United States.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.
020.
1380 Dig Dis Sci (2017) 62:1373–1380
123
- Increasing Burden of Chronic Liver Disease Among Adolescents and Young Adults in the USA: A Silent Epidemic
- Abstract
- Background and Aims
- Methods
- Results
- Conclusion
- Introduction
- Methods
- Study Design and Study Cohort
- Definitions
- Statistical Analysis
- Results
- Participant Characteristics
- Prevalence of Chronic Liver Disease in AYAs
- Risk Factors for Chronic Liver Disease in AYAs
- Discussion
- Author’s contributions
- References