Discussion
10
Coordination in a Supply Chain
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Chopra and Meindl Supply Chain Management, 5e
1-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
1-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
1-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
1
Learning Objectives
Describe supply chain coordination and the bullwhip effect, and their impact on supply chain performance.
Identify obstacles to coordination in a supply chain.
Discuss managerial levers that help achieve coordination in a supply chain.
Understand the different forms of collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment possible in a supply chain.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
2
Lack of Supply Chain Coordination and the Bullwhip Effect
Supply chain coordination – all stages of the chain take actions that are aligned and increase total supply chain surplus
Requires that each stage share information and take into account the effects of its actions on the other stages
Lack of coordination results when:
Objectives of different stages conflict
Information moving between stages is delayed or distorted
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Lack co-ordintation tend to be higher when more and more complex a supply chain is. E.g. having thousand of suppliers and lack of communication. E.g. Ford having thousand of suppliers.
3
Bullwhip Effect
Fluctuations in orders increase as they move up the supply chain from retailers to wholesalers to manufacturers to suppliers
Distorts demand information within the supply chain
Results from a loss of supply chain coordination
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4
Demand at Different Stages
Figure 10-1
1
2
3
4
distributors
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Fluctuations are low in the beginning and gets higher downstream
Creates problem with inventory
E.g. Walmart- decide to place a bigger order with the distributer. So they believe that there is a rise in demand and then they then place a higher order with manufacturer and then they place a bigger order with supplier. Then in another period the promotion is over and the orders is then reduced and then the orders are then reduced and this is the bull-whip effect.
5
The Effect on Performance
Supply chain lacks coordination if each stage optimizes only its local objective
Reduces total profits
Performance measures include
Manufacturing cost
Inventory cost
Replenishment lead time
Transportation cost
Labor cost for shipping and receiving
Level of product availability
Relationships across the supply chain
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Manufacturing cost ( Increase) Why ? Capacity and inventory
Inventory cost( Increase)
Replenishment lead time( Increase) orders are not put in time and
Transportation cost( Increase)
Labor cost for shipping and receiving ( Increase) – carry excess labour capacity or fluctuation such as sub-contract etc.
Level of product availability ( decrease) – retailer will run out of stock
Relationships across the supply chain ( causes lack of trust and conflict)
6
The Effect on Performance
| Performance Measure | Impact of the Lack of Coordination |
| Manufacturing cost | Increases |
| Inventory cost | Increases |
| Replenishment lead time | Increases |
| Transportation cost | Increases |
| Shipping and receiving cost | Increases |
| Level of product availability | Decreases |
| Profitability | Decreases |
Table 10-1
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
7
Obstacles to Coordination in a Supply Chain
Incentive Obstacles
Information Processing Obstacles
Operational Obstacles
Pricing Obstacles
Behavioral Obstacles
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Conflict when departments are focused on their individual goals and not the overall strategic goal of the organization as a whole.
8
Incentive Obstacles
Occur when incentives offered to different stages or participants in a supply chain lead to actions that increase variability and reduce total supply chain profits
Local optimization within functions or stages of a supply chain
Sales force incentives
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
E.g. local optimization. When incentives are only within local optimization only for retailer, distributor or supplier it will not be cohesive. e.g. being part of a team as a soccer player but only hogging the ball and never using your team make to score a goal.
Sales Force Incentives
Quantity sold to distributors/retailers (sell-in)
Quantity sold to final customers (sell-through)
9
Information Processing Obstacles
When demand information is distorted as it moves between different stages of the supply chain, leading to increased variability in orders within the supply chain
Forecasting based on orders, not customer demand
Lack of information sharing
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Eg- customer to retailer to wholesaler … supplier demand is distorted.. Wholesaler forecast is based on orders and not customer demand
E.g. Walmart is having a promotion for product and wholesaler and manufacturer are not aware of the promotion they plan the same forecast for future as a permanent forecast. But when the oreder return to normal the manufacturer may believe that the orders of demand is now lower and may then order smaller lots.
10
Operational Obstacles
Occur when placing and filling orders lead to an increase in variability
Ordering in large lots
Large replenishment lead times
Rationing and shortage gaming
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Large lots. Demand fluctuations are smaller from retailer but then orders are done in larger lots due the time of replenishment. E.g. Demand every week but orders are placed every 5 weeks.
Large Replenishment Lead Times: eg lead time is 1 week. Retailer thinks that it will take 1 week to get items. Retailer see a growth in demand they will make an adjustment. But what if they have a lead time of 8 weeks they will then project a larger order. This will cause huge fluctuations when lead times are greater.
Rationing: high demand products and short supply-
Shortage gaming: what is the order size: retailer as for 100 and wholesaler gives 75 so next time they may ask for 125 to get the 100
11
Operational Obstacles
Figure 10-2
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
12
Pricing Obstacles
When pricing policies for a product lead to an increase in variability of orders placed
Lot-size based quantity decisions
Price fluctuations
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
E.g. LS: Discounts are offered based on lot sizes. And then lot sizes are bigger and bigger.
PF: Short term discounts that causes forward buying by wholesalers or retailer.
13
Pricing Obstacles
Figure 10-3
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
14
Behavioral Obstacles
Problems in learning within organizations that contribute to information distortion
Each stage of the supply chain views its actions locally and is unable to see the impact of its actions on other stages
Different stages of the supply chain react to the current local situation rather than trying to identify the root causes
Different stages of the supply chain blame one another for the fluctuations ( Causes lack of trust)
No stage of the supply chain learns from its actions over time
A lack of trust among supply chain partners causes them to be opportunistic at the expense of overall supply chain performance
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
15
Managerial Levers to Achieve Coordination
Aligning goals and incentives
Improving information accuracy
Improving operational performance
Designing pricing strategies to stabilize orders
Building strategic partnerships and trust
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
How coordination can be improved
16
Aligning Goals and Incentives
Align goals and incentives so that every participant in supply chain activities works to maximize total supply chain profits
Align goals across the supply chain
Align incentives across functions
Pricing for coordination
Alter sales force incentives from sell-in (to the retailer) to sell-through (by the retailer)
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
E.g. Walmart pays HP for each printer sold. HP directly has information straight from customer.
17
Improving Information Visibility and Accuracy
Sharing point of sale data (customer demand data)
Implementing collaborative forecasting and planning
Designing single-stage control of replenishment (information sharing)
Continuous replenishment programs (CRP)
Vendor managed inventory (VMI)
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
E.g. Walmart assign one of its suppliers as the leader for each major product category. They are responsible for store level replenishment.
18
Improving Operational Performance
Reducing replenishment lead time
Reducing lot sizes
Rationing based on past sales and sharing information to limit gaming
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Online ordering or EDI- Electronic Data Interchange
Information is not as distorted in smaller lot sizes because it is more often. (RFID)
Rationing based on PS and LG: manufacturer can look at past sales data and then do rationing based on that data.
19
Designing Pricing Strategies to Stabilize Orders
Encouraging retailers to order in smaller lots and reduce forward buying
Moving from lot size-based to volume-based quantity discounts
Stabilizing pricing
Building strategic partnerships and trust
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Lot size tend to create bigger fluctuations
Volume Based quantity discounts is based on overall purchased in a specific period e.g. quarter or year.
Improve order coordination.
Stabalize pricing- no promotings- Everyday low prices less fluctuations (no forward buying needed)
20
Continuous Replenishment and Vendor-Managed Inventories
A single point of replenishment
CRP – wholesaler or manufacturer replenishes based on POS (point of sale) data
VMI – manufacturer or supplier is responsible for all decisions regarding inventory
Substitutes
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Continuous replenishment program
Vendor managed inventories.
21
Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment (CPFR)
Sellers and buyers in a supply chain may collaborate along any or all of the following
Strategy and planning
Demand and supply management
Execution
Analysis
Retail event collaboration
DC replenishment collaboration
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Visibility in the supply chain, minimize excess inventory
22
Common CPFR Scenarios
| CPFR Scenario | Where Applied in Supply Chain | Industries Where Applied |
| Retail event collaboration | Highly promoted channels or categories | All industries other than those that practice EDLP |
| DC replenishment collaboration | Retail DC or distributor DC | Drugstores, hardware, grocery |
| Store replenishment collaboration | Direct store delivery or retail DC-to-store delivery | Mass merchants, club stores |
| Collaborative assortment planning | Apparel and seasonal goods | Department stores, specialty retail |
Table 10-2
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
23
Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment (CPFR)
Store replenishment collaboration
Collaborative assortment planning
Organizational and technology requirements for successful CPFR
Risks and hurdles for a CPFR implementation
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
24
Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment (CPFR)
Figure 10-4
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
-blockchain
25
Achieving Coordination in Practice
Quantify the bullwhip effect
Get top management commitment for coordination
Devote resources to coordination
Focus on communication with other stages
Try to achieve coordination in the entire supply chain network
Use technology to improve connectivity in the supply chain
Share the benefits of coordination equitably
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Bullwhip effect is to match supply with demand. Minimum and maximum you want to keep it all in alignment with all parties. Supplier, manufacturer and retailer to do what : keep cost down.
26
Summary of Learning Objectives
Describe supply chain coordination and the bullwhip effect, and their impact on supply chain performance
Identify obstacles to coordination in a supply chain
Discuss managerial levers that help achieve coordination in a supply chain
Understand the different forms of CPFR possible in a supply chain
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Depends on your business model and when you are going plan activities.
Block Chain: https://www.linkedin.com/learning/search?keywords=block%20chain%20in%20supply%20chain&u=26194554
27
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
10-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
28
Chapter 10 • Coordination in a Supply Chain 251
1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
0
W ho
le sa
le r
O rd
er 1000
900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
0
C on
su m
er D
em an
d
1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
0
M an
uf ac
tu re
r O
rd er
1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
0
R et
ai le
r O
rd er
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 1 4 7 10 13 16 192225 28 313437 40
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41
Time Time
Time Time
Wholesaler’s Orders to Manufacturer
Consumer Sales at Retailer
Manufacturer’s Orders with Supplier
Retailer’s Orders to Wholesaler
FIGURE 10-1 Demand Fluctuations at Different Stages of a Supply Chain
to coordinate information exchange with thousands of suppliers and dealers. The fundamental challenge today is for supply chains to achieve coordination in spite of multiple ownership and increased product variety.
One outcome of the lack of supply chain coordination is the bullwhip effect, in which fluctuations in orders increase as they move up the supply chain from retailers to wholesalers to manufacturers to suppliers, as shown in Figure 10-1. The bullwhip effect distorts demand information within the supply chain, with each stage having a different estimate of what demand looks like.
Procter & Gamble (P&G) has observed the bullwhip effect in the supply chain for Pampers diapers.1 The company found that raw material orders from P&G to its suppliers fluctuated significantly over time. Farther down the chain, when sales at retail stores were studied, the fluctuations, while present, were small. It is reasonable to assume that the consumers of diapers (babies) at the last stage of the supply chain used them at a steady rate. Although consumption of the end product was stable, orders for raw material were highly variable, increasing costs and making it difficult to match supply and demand.
HP also found that the fluctuation in orders increased significantly as they moved from the resellers up the supply chain to the printer division to the integrated circuit division.2 Once again,
1 Lee, Padmanabhan, and Whang (1997). 2 Ibid.
M10_CHOP3952_05_SE_C10.QXD 10/25/11 4:34 PM Page 251