Brief Discussion

profileJosue03
chopra_scm5_ch041.pptx

4

Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales

PowerPoint presentation to accompany

Chopra and Meindl Supply Chain Management, 5e

1-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

1-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

1-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Learning Objectives

Identify the key factors to be considered when designing a distribution network

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of various distribution options

Understand how online sales have affected the design of distribution networks in different industries

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

The Role of Distribution in the Supply Chain

Distribution – the steps taken to move and store a product from the supplier stage to the customer stage in a supply chain

Drives profitability by directly affecting supply chain cost and the customer experience

Choice of distribution network can achieve supply chain objectives from low cost to high responsiveness

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design

Distribution network performance evaluated along two dimensions

Customer needs that are met

Cost of meeting customer needs

Evaluate the impact on customer service and cost for different distribution network options

Profitability of the delivery network determined by revenue from met customer needs and network costs

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design

Elements of customer service influenced by network structure:

Response time

Product variety

Product availability

Customer experience

Order visibility

Returnability

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Class I want each of you to Take 5 minutes to give me an example

5

Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design

Supply chain costs affected by network structure:

Inventories

Transportation

Facilities and handling

Information

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

6

Desired Response Time and Number of Facilities

Figure 4-1

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Notes: Increasing the number of facilities moves them closer to the end consumer. This reduces the response time. As Amazon has built warehouses, the average time from the warehouse to the end consumer has decreased. McMaster-Carr provides 1-2 day coverage of most of the U.S from 6 facilities. W.W. Grainger is able to increase coverage to same day delivery using about 370 facilities.

Inventory Costs and Number of Facilities

Figure 4-2

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Notes: Inventory costs increase, facility costs increase, and transportation costs decrease as we increase the number of facilities.

Transportation Costs and Number of Facilities

Figure 4-3

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Notes: Inventory costs increase, facility costs increase, and transportation costs decrease as we increase the number of facilities.

Facility Costs and Number of Facilities

Figure 4-4

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Notes: Inventory costs increase, facility costs increase, and transportation costs decrease as we increase the number of facilities.

Logistics Cost, Response Time, and Number of Facilities

Figure 4-5

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Design Options for a Distribution Network

Distribution network choices from the manufacturer to the end consumer

Two key decisions

Will product be delivered to the customer location or picked up from a prearranged site?

Will product flow through an intermediary (or intermediate location)?

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Design Options for a Distribution Network

One of six designs may be used

Manufacturer storage with direct shipping

Manufacturer storage with direct shipping and in-transit merge

Distributor storage with carrier delivery

Distributor storage with last-mile delivery

Manufacturer/distributor storage with customer pickup

Retail storage with customer pickup

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping

Figure 4-6

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Information goes to Retailer and manufacturer ships product directly to costomer.

Transportation cost – Up

Information – Up

Inventory- Low

Facility cost – low

Response time- Longer

Product Variety- large product variety

Produc

14

Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping Network

Cost Factor Performance
Inventory Lower costs because of aggregation. Benefits of aggregation are highest for low-demand, high-value items. Benefits are large if product customization can be postponed at the manufacturer.
Transportation Higher transportation costs because of increased distance and disaggregate shipping.
Facilities and handling Lower facility costs because of aggregation. Some saving on handling costs if manufacturer can manage small shipments or ship from production line.
Information Significant investment in information infrastructure to integrate manufacturer and retailer.

Table 4-1

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping Network

Service Factor Performance
Response time Long response time of one to two weeks because of increased distance and two stages for order processing. Response time may vary by product, thus complicating receiving.
Product variety Easy to provide a high level of variety.
Product availability Easy to provide a high level of product availability because of aggregation at manufacturer.
Customer experience Good in terms of home delivery but can suffer if order from several manufacturers is sent as partial shipments.
Time to market Fast, with the product available as soon as the first unit is produced.
Order visibility More difficult but also more important from a customer service perspective.
Returnability Expensive and difficult to implement.

Table 4-1

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

In-Transit Merge Network

Figure 4-7

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

In-Transit Merge

Cost Factor Performance
Inventory Similar to drop-shipping.
Transportation Somewhat lower transportation costs than drop-shipping.
Facilities and handling Handling costs higher than drop-shipping at carrier; receiving costs lower at customer.
Information Investment is somewhat higher than for drop-shipping.

Table 4-2

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

In-Transit Merge

Service Factor Performance
Response time Similar to drop-shipping; may be marginally higher.
Product variety Similar to drop-shipping.
Product availability Similar to drop-shipping.
Customer experience Better than drop-shipping because only a single delivery has to be received.
Time to market Similar to drop-shipping.
Order visibility Similar to drop-shipping.
Returnability Similar to drop-shipping.

Table 4-2

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery

Figure 4-8

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery

Cost Factor Performance
Inventory Higher than manufacturer storage. Difference is not large for faster moving items but can be large for very slow-moving items.
Transportation Lower than manufacturer storage. Reduction is highest for faster moving items.
Facilities and handling Somewhat higher than manufacturer storage. The difference can be large for very slow-moving items.
Information Simpler infrastructure compared to manufacturer storage.

Table 4-3

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery

Service Factor Performance
Response time Faster than manufacturer storage.
Product variety Lower than manufacturer storage.
Product availability Higher cost to provide the same level of availability as manufacturer storage.
Customer experience Better than manufacturer storage with drop-shipping.
Time to market Higher than manufacturer storage.
Order visibility Easier than manufacturer storage.
Returnability Easier than manufacturer storage.

Table 4-3

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery

Figure 4-9

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery

Cost Factor Performance
Inventory Higher than distributor storage with package carrier delivery.
Transportation Very high cost given minimal scale economies. Higher than any other distribution option.
Facilities and handling Facility costs higher than manufacturer storage or distributor storage with package carrier delivery, but lower than a chain of retail stores.
Information Similar to distributor storage with package carrier delivery.

Table 4-4

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery

Service Factor Performance
Response time Very quick. Same day to next-day delivery.
Product variety Somewhat less than distributor storage with package carrier delivery but larger than retail stores.
Product availability More expensive to provide availability than any other option except retail stores.
Customer experience Very good, particularly for bulky items. Slightly higher than distributor storage with package carrier delivery.
Time to market Less of an issue and easier to implement than manufacturer storage or distributor storage with package carrier delivery.
Order visibility Easier to implement than other previous options.
Returnability Harder and more expensive than a retail network.

Table 4-4

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Manufacturer or Distributor Storage with Customer Pickup

Figure 4-10

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Manufacturer or Distributor Storage with Customer Pickup

Cost Factor Performance
Inventory Can match any other option, depending on the location of inventory.
Transportation Lower than the use of package carriers, especially if using an existing delivery network.
Facilities and handling Facility costs can be high if new facilities have to be built. Costs are lower if existing facilities are used. The increase in handling cost at the pickup site can be significant.
Information Significant investment in infrastructure required.

Table 4-5

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Manufacturer or Distributor Storage with Customer Pickup

Service Factor Performance
Response time Similar to package carrier delivery with manufacturer or distributor storage. Same-day delivery possible for items stored locally at pickup site.
Product variety Similar to other manufacturer or distributor storage options.
Product availability Similar to other manufacturer or distributor storage options.
Customer experience Lower than other options because of the lack of home delivery. Experience is sensitive to capability of pickup location.
Time to market Similar to manufacturer storage options.
Order visibility Difficult but essential.
Returnability Somewhat easier given that pickup location can handle returns.

Table 4-5

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Retail Storage with Customer Pickup

Cost Factor Performance
Inventory Higher than all other options.
Transportation Lower than all other options.
Facilities and handling Higher than other options. The increase in handling cost at the pickup site can be significant for online and phone orders.
Information Some investment in infrastructure required for online and phone orders.

Table 4-6

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Retail Storage with Customer Pickup

Service Factor Performance
Response time Same-day (immediate) pickup possible for items stored locally at pickup site.
Product variety Lower than all other options.
Product availability More expensive to provide than all other options.
Customer experience Related to whether shopping is viewed as a positive or negative experience by customer.
Time to market Highest among distribution options.
Order visibility Trivial for in-store orders. Difficult, but essential, for online and phone orders.
Returnability Easier than other options because retail store can provide a substitute.

Table 4-6

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Comparative Performance of Delivery Network Designs

Table 4-7

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Identify the best and worst network along various dimensions.

Response time: (B) retail stores (W) Manufacturer storage with direct ship

Product variety: (W) retail stores (B) Manufacturer storage with direct ship

Product availability: (W) retail store (B) Manufacturer storage

Inventory: (W) retail store (B) manufacturer storage

Transportation: (B) retail store (W) last mile delivery

Facility: (W) retail store (B) manufacturer storage

Handling: (W) Distributor storage with last mile delivery (B)

Information: Retail stores may be less complex; manufacturer storage with pickup may be very complex

Delivery Networks for Different Product/ Customer Characteristics

Table 4-8

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

When designing the delivery network we should account for product and market characteristics.

High demand products will have transportation cost play a significant role. Use network with good transportation cost (retail stores)

Very low demand products will have inventory play a significant role. Use network with low inventory costs (direct shipping)

Many product sources: transportation + information plays a role. Distributor storage with package carrier

Few product sources but high customization: manufacturer storage with merge in transit

High product variety: inventory cost will be significant. Use distributor storage

Low customer effort: Distributor storage with package carrier delivery or last mile delivery depending upon desired response time

Impact of Online Sales on Customer Service

Response time to customers

Physical products take longer to fulfill than retail store

No delay for information goods

Product variety

Easier to offer larger selection

Product availability

Aggregating inventory and better information on customer preferences improves product availability

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Impact of Online Sales on Customer Service

Customer experience

Improved access, customization, and convenience

Faster time to market

Order Visibility

Returnability

Harder with online orders

Proportion of returns likely to be much higher

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Impact of Online Sales on Customer Service

Direct Sales to Customers

Social networking channels allow firms to directly pitch products and promotion

Flexible Pricing, Product Portfolio, and Promotions

Manage revenues from product portfolio more effectively than traditional channels

Promotion information can be conveyed to customers quickly and inexpensively

Efficient Funds Transfer

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Impact of Online Sales on Cost

Inventory

Lower inventory levels if customers will wait

Postpone variety until after the customer order is received

Facilities

Costs related to the number and location of facilities in a network

Costs associated with the operations in these facilities

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Impact of Online Sales on Cost

Transportation

Lower cost of “transporting” information goods in digital form

For nondigital, aggregating inventories increases outbound transportation

Information

Share demand, planning, and forecasting information throughout its supply chain

Additional costs to build and maintain the information infrastructure

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Online Sales Scorecard

Area Impact
Response time
Product variety
Product availability
Customer experience
Time to market
Order visibility
Direct sales
Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions
Efficient funds transfer
Inventory
Facilities
Transportation
Information
Key: +2 = very positive; +1 = positive; 0 = neutral; −1 = negative; −2 = very negative.

Table 4-9

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using Online Sales to Sell Computer Hardware: Dell

Figure 4-11

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using Online Sales to Sell Computer Hardware: Dell

Impact of online sales on customer service

Delay in fulfilling customer request

Impact of online sales on cost

Reduced inventory costs

Lower facility costs

Higher total transportation costs

Incremental increase in information costs

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Impact of Online Sales on Performance

Area Impact for Customized Hardware Impact for Standard Low-Cost Hardware
Response time –1 –2
Product variety +2 0
Product availability +1 +1
Customer experience +2 +1
Time to market +2 +1
Order visibility +1 0
Direct sales +2 +1
Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions +2 +1
Efficient funds transfer +2 +2
Inventory +2 +1
Facilities +2 +1
Transportation –1 –2
Information 0 0

Table 4-10

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using Online Sales to Sell Computer Hardware: Dell

A tailored supply chain network

A hybrid model can be very effective

More significant as hardware becomes more of a commodity

Take advantage of the strengths of both online sales and traditional retail and distribution channels

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using Online Sales to Sell Books: Amazon

Impact of online sales on customer service

Internet has not shortened supply chains

Increased selection, convenience

Impact of online sales on cost

Reduced inventory costs

Lower facility costs

Higher total transportation costs

Increase in information costs

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Impact of Online Sales on Performance

Area Physical books e-books
Response time –1 +1
Product variety +2 +2
Product availability +1 +2
Customer experience +1 +1
Time to market +1 +2
Order visibility 0 0
Direct sales 0 +1
Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions +1 +1
Efficient funds transfer 0 0
Inventory +1 +2
Facilities +1 +1
Transportation –2 +1
Information –1 –1

Table 4-11

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using Online Sales to Sell Books: Amazon

A supply chain network for books

Traditional bookstores pressured from both ends

Amazon more efficient

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using the Internet to Sell Groceries: Peapod

Impact of online sales on customer service

Sell convenience and the time savings

Offers less variety

Creating a personalized shopping experience and customized advertising and promotions

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using the Internet to Sell Groceries: Peapod

Impact of online sales on cost

Reduced inventory costs

Higher facility costs due to picking operation

Significantly higher total transportation costs

Increase in information costs

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Impact of Online Sales on Performance

Area Impact
Response time –1
Product variety 0
Product availability 0
Customer experience +1
Time to market 0
Order visibility –1
Direct sales 0
Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions +1
Efficient funds transfer 0
Inventory 0
Facilities –1
Transportation –2
Information –1

Table 4-12

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using Internet to Sell Groceries: Peapod

Value of online sales to a traditional grocery chain

Complement the strengths of their existing network

Offer an entire array of services at differing prices based on the amount of work the customer does

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using the Internet to Rent Movies: Netflix

Impact of online sales on customer service

Staggering selection and an excellent recommendation engine

Video streaming through a variety of devices

Customers received their DVDs within 24 hours of being shipped

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Using the Internet to Rent Movies: Netflix

Impact of online sales on cost

Reduced inventory costs

Lower facility costs

Considerably higher total transportation costs, increased streaming will reduce transportation costs

Increase in information costs

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Impact of Online Sales on Performance

Area Impact for DVDs Impact for Digital Content
Response time –1 +2
Product variety +2 +2
Product availability +1 +2
Customer experience +1 +1
Time to market –1 –1
Order visibility 0 0
Direct sales 0 0
Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions +1 +1
Efficient funds transfer 0 0
Inventory +2 +2
Facilities +1 +1
Transportation –2 0
Information –1 –1

Table 4-12

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Distribution Networks in Practice

The ownership structure of the distribution network can have as big as an impact as the type of distribution network

It is important to have adaptable distribution networks

Product price, commoditization, and criticality affect the type of distribution system preferred by customers

Integrate the Internet with the existing physical network

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Distribution Networks in Practice

Consider whether an exclusive distribution strategy is advantageous

Product, price, commoditization, and criticality have an impact on the type of distribution system preferred by customers

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Summary of Learning Objectives

Identify the key factors to be considered when designing a distribution network

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of various distribution options

Understand how online sales have affected the design of distribution networks in different industries

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Printed in the United States of America.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

4-‹#›

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales 71

To decrease inventory costs, firms try to consolidate and limit the number of facilities in their supply chain network. For example, with fewer facilities, Amazon is able to turn its inventory about 10 times a year, whereas Barnes & Noble, with hundreds of facilities, achieves only about 3 turns per year.

Inbound transportation costs are the costs incurred in bringing material into a facility. Outbound transportation costs are the costs of sending material out of a facility. Outbound transportation costs per unit tend to be higher than inbound costs because inbound lot sizes are typically larger. For example, an Amazon warehouse receives full truckload shipments of books on the inbound side, but ships out small packages with only a few books per customer on the outbound side. Increasing the number of warehouse locations decreases the average outbound distance to the customer and makes outbound transportation distance a smaller fraction of the total distance traveled by the product. Thus, as long as inbound transportation economies of scale are maintained, increasing the number of facilities decreases total trans- portation cost, as shown in Figure 4-3. If the number of facilities is increased to a point where inbound lot sizes are also very small and result in a significant loss of economies of scale in inbound transportation, increasing the number of facilities increases total transportation cost, as shown in Figure 4-3.

Inventory Costs

Number of Facilities

FIGURE 4-2 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Inventory Costs

Transportation Cost

Number of Facilities

FIGURE 4-3 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Transportation Cost

M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 71

Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales 71

To decrease inventory costs, firms try to consolidate and limit the number of facilities in their supply chain network. For example, with fewer facilities, Amazon is able to turn its inventory about 10 times a year, whereas Barnes & Noble, with hundreds of facilities, achieves only about 3 turns per year.

Inbound transportation costs are the costs incurred in bringing material into a facility. Outbound transportation costs are the costs of sending material out of a facility. Outbound transportation costs per unit tend to be higher than inbound costs because inbound lot sizes are typically larger. For example, an Amazon warehouse receives full truckload shipments of books on the inbound side, but ships out small packages with only a few books per customer on the outbound side. Increasing the number of warehouse locations decreases the average outbound distance to the customer and makes outbound transportation distance a smaller fraction of the total distance traveled by the product. Thus, as long as inbound transportation economies of scale are maintained, increasing the number of facilities decreases total trans- portation cost, as shown in Figure 4-3. If the number of facilities is increased to a point where inbound lot sizes are also very small and result in a significant loss of economies of scale in inbound transportation, increasing the number of facilities increases total transportation cost, as shown in Figure 4-3.

Inventory Costs

Number of Facilities

FIGURE 4-2 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Inventory Costs

Transportation Cost

Number of Facilities

FIGURE 4-3 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Transportation Cost

M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 71

Facility Costs

Number of Facilities

FIGURE 4-4 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Facility Costs

72 Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales

Facility costs decrease as the number of facilities is reduced, as shown in Figure 4-4, because a consolidation of facilities allows a firm to exploit economies of scale. While Amazon achieved a property, plant, and equipment turnover (PPET) of 19 in 2009, Barnes & Noble had a PPET of just over 7.

Total logistics costs are the sum of inventory, transportation, and facility costs for a supply chain network. As the number of facilities increases, total logistics costs first decrease and then increase as shown in Figure 4-5. Each firm should have at least the number of facilities that minimizes total logistics costs. Amazon has more than one warehouse primarily to reduce its logistics costs (and improve response time). If a firm wants to reduce the response time to its customers further, it may have to increase the number of facilities beyond the point that minimizes logistics costs. A firm should add facilities beyond the cost-minimizing point only if managers are confident that the increase in revenues because of better responsiveness is greater than the increase in costs because of the additional facilities.

Response Time

Number of Facilities

Total Logistics Cost

FIGURE 4-5 Variation in Logistics Cost and Response Time with Number of Facilities

M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 72

Facility Costs

Number of Facilities

FIGURE 4-4 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Facility Costs

72 Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales

Facility costs decrease as the number of facilities is reduced, as shown in Figure 4-4, because a consolidation of facilities allows a firm to exploit economies of scale. While Amazon achieved a property, plant, and equipment turnover (PPET) of 19 in 2009, Barnes & Noble had a PPET of just over 7.

Total logistics costs are the sum of inventory, transportation, and facility costs for a supply chain network. As the number of facilities increases, total logistics costs first decrease and then increase as shown in Figure 4-5. Each firm should have at least the number of facilities that minimizes total logistics costs. Amazon has more than one warehouse primarily to reduce its logistics costs (and improve response time). If a firm wants to reduce the response time to its customers further, it may have to increase the number of facilities beyond the point that minimizes logistics costs. A firm should add facilities beyond the cost-minimizing point only if managers are confident that the increase in revenues because of better responsiveness is greater than the increase in costs because of the additional facilities.

Response Time

Number of Facilities

Total Logistics Cost

FIGURE 4-5 Variation in Logistics Cost and Response Time with Number of Facilities

M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 72

The blank B2C online sales scorecard shown in Table 4-9 can be used by a firm to summarize the impact of online sales on each of the areas identified earlier.

The value of setting up online sales is not the same in every industry. Whereas Amazon and Blue Nile have seen their profits increase after going online, Webvan and many other online grocers have gone out of business. The scorecard in Table 4-9 can be used to understand how online sales affect the performance of different supply chain networks. In the next section, we apply the online sales scorecard to several examples.

Using Online Sales to Sell Computer Hardware: Dell

The online channel has proved very effective for the sale of computer hardware and by 2009 represented about half the sales in this category. After more than a decade of tremendous success selling its PCs only online, Dell started to sell PCs through retail stores such as Wal-Mart in 2007. Since about 2005, Apple has had considerable success selling its phones and computers through retail stores. This raises the question of the relative value of the online channel and retail stores for selling computer hardware.

To make this comparison, we compare Dell’s supply chain for each channel. As shown in Figure 4-11, when using the online channel, Dell typically starts assembly after receiving a

Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales 89

Pull Retail Store

Dell

Supplier

Dell’s Retail Supply Chain

Customer

Dell

Supplier

Dell’s Online Supply Chain

Pull Customer

FIGURE 4-11 Supply Chains for Dell’s Online and Retail Channels

Table 4-9 The Online Sales Scorecard Area Impact

Response time

Product variety

Product availability

Customer experience

Time to market

Order visibility

Direct sales

Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions

Efficient funds transfer

Inventory

Facilities

Transportation

Information

Key: +2 = very positive; +1 = positive; 0 = neutral; !1 = negative; !2 = very negative.

M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 89