Brief Discussion
4
Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Chopra and Meindl Supply Chain Management, 5e
1-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
1-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
1-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHNuOLrAwlo- Unilever
network design short videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gg_i7jFmINw&list=PLI3QncrPtQTXFE5TOV09ytyLCi8XSMBtU&index=1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkt9ncUzEHg&list=PLI3QncrPtQTXFE5TOV09ytyLCi8XSMBtU&index=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xR4wcDUY9U&list=PLI3QncrPtQTXFE5TOV09ytyLCi8XSMBtU&index=3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPzw_w8W0OI&list=PLI3QncrPtQTXFE5TOV09ytyLCi8XSMBtU&index=4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSH1vQV_9SU&list=PLI3QncrPtQTXFE5TOV09ytyLCi8XSMBtU&index=5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooe_8E8jO8c&list=PLI3QncrPtQTXFE5TOV09ytyLCi8XSMBtU&index=6
BLOCK CHAIN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtK65VH5OBg
1
Learning Objectives
Identify the key factors to be considered when designing a distribution network
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of various distribution options
Understand how online sales have affected the design of distribution networks in different industries
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
The Role of Distribution in the Supply Chain
Distribution – the steps taken to move and store a product from the supplier stage to the customer stage in a supply chain
Drives profitability by directly affecting supply chain cost and the customer experience
Choice of distribution network can achieve supply chain objectives from low cost to high responsiveness
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design
Distribution network performance evaluated along two dimensions
Customer needs that are met
Cost of meeting customer needs
Evaluate the impact on customer service and cost for different distribution network options
Profitability of the delivery network determined by revenue from met customer needs and network costs
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design
Elements of customer service influenced by network structure:
Response time
Product variety
Product availability
Customer experience
Order visibility
Returnability
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Class I want each of you to Take 5 minutes to give me an example
5
Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design
Supply chain costs affected by network structure:
Inventories
Transportation
Facilities and handling
Information
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
6
Desired Response Time and Number of Facilities
Figure 4-1
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Notes: Increasing the number of facilities moves them closer to the end consumer. This reduces the response time. As Amazon has built warehouses, the average time from the warehouse to the end consumer has decreased. McMaster-Carr provides 1-2 day coverage of most of the U.S from 6 facilities. W.W. Grainger is able to increase coverage to same day delivery using about 370 facilities.
Inventory Costs and Number of Facilities
Figure 4-2
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Notes: Inventory costs increase, facility costs increase, and transportation costs decrease as we increase the number of facilities.
Transportation Costs and Number of Facilities
Figure 4-3
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Notes: Inventory costs increase, facility costs increase, and transportation costs decrease as we increase the number of facilities.
Facility Costs and Number of Facilities
Figure 4-4
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Notes: Inventory costs increase, facility costs increase, and transportation costs decrease as we increase the number of facilities.
Logistics Cost, Response Time, and Number of Facilities
Figure 4-5
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Design Options for a Distribution Network
Distribution network choices from the manufacturer to the end consumer
Two key decisions
Will product be delivered to the customer location or picked up from a prearranged site?
Will product flow through an intermediary (or intermediate location)?
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Design Options for a Distribution Network
One of six designs may be used
Manufacturer storage with direct shipping
Manufacturer storage with direct shipping and in-transit merge
Distributor storage with carrier delivery
Distributor storage with last-mile delivery
Manufacturer/distributor storage with customer pickup
Retail storage with customer pickup
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping
Figure 4-6
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Information goes to Retailer and manufacturer ships product directly to costomer.
Transportation cost – Up
Information – Up
Inventory- Low
Facility cost – low
Response time- Longer
Product Variety- large product variety
Produc
14
Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping Network
| Cost Factor | Performance |
| Inventory | Lower costs because of aggregation. Benefits of aggregation are highest for low-demand, high-value items. Benefits are large if product customization can be postponed at the manufacturer. |
| Transportation | Higher transportation costs because of increased distance and disaggregate shipping. |
| Facilities and handling | Lower facility costs because of aggregation. Some saving on handling costs if manufacturer can manage small shipments or ship from production line. |
| Information | Significant investment in information infrastructure to integrate manufacturer and retailer. |
Table 4-1
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping Network
| Service Factor | Performance |
| Response time | Long response time of one to two weeks because of increased distance and two stages for order processing. Response time may vary by product, thus complicating receiving. |
| Product variety | Easy to provide a high level of variety. |
| Product availability | Easy to provide a high level of product availability because of aggregation at manufacturer. |
| Customer experience | Good in terms of home delivery but can suffer if order from several manufacturers is sent as partial shipments. |
| Time to market | Fast, with the product available as soon as the first unit is produced. |
| Order visibility | More difficult but also more important from a customer service perspective. |
| Returnability | Expensive and difficult to implement. |
Table 4-1
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
In-Transit Merge Network
Figure 4-7
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
In-Transit Merge
| Cost Factor | Performance |
| Inventory | Similar to drop-shipping. |
| Transportation | Somewhat lower transportation costs than drop-shipping. |
| Facilities and handling | Handling costs higher than drop-shipping at carrier; receiving costs lower at customer. |
| Information | Investment is somewhat higher than for drop-shipping. |
Table 4-2
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
In-Transit Merge
| Service Factor | Performance |
| Response time | Similar to drop-shipping; may be marginally higher. |
| Product variety | Similar to drop-shipping. |
| Product availability | Similar to drop-shipping. |
| Customer experience | Better than drop-shipping because only a single delivery has to be received. |
| Time to market | Similar to drop-shipping. |
| Order visibility | Similar to drop-shipping. |
| Returnability | Similar to drop-shipping. |
Table 4-2
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery
Figure 4-8
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery
| Cost Factor | Performance |
| Inventory | Higher than manufacturer storage. Difference is not large for faster moving items but can be large for very slow-moving items. |
| Transportation | Lower than manufacturer storage. Reduction is highest for faster moving items. |
| Facilities and handling | Somewhat higher than manufacturer storage. The difference can be large for very slow-moving items. |
| Information | Simpler infrastructure compared to manufacturer storage. |
Table 4-3
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery
| Service Factor | Performance |
| Response time | Faster than manufacturer storage. |
| Product variety | Lower than manufacturer storage. |
| Product availability | Higher cost to provide the same level of availability as manufacturer storage. |
| Customer experience | Better than manufacturer storage with drop-shipping. |
| Time to market | Higher than manufacturer storage. |
| Order visibility | Easier than manufacturer storage. |
| Returnability | Easier than manufacturer storage. |
Table 4-3
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery
Figure 4-9
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery
| Cost Factor | Performance |
| Inventory | Higher than distributor storage with package carrier delivery. |
| Transportation | Very high cost given minimal scale economies. Higher than any other distribution option. |
| Facilities and handling | Facility costs higher than manufacturer storage or distributor storage with package carrier delivery, but lower than a chain of retail stores. |
| Information | Similar to distributor storage with package carrier delivery. |
Table 4-4
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery
| Service Factor | Performance |
| Response time | Very quick. Same day to next-day delivery. |
| Product variety | Somewhat less than distributor storage with package carrier delivery but larger than retail stores. |
| Product availability | More expensive to provide availability than any other option except retail stores. |
| Customer experience | Very good, particularly for bulky items. Slightly higher than distributor storage with package carrier delivery. |
| Time to market | Less of an issue and easier to implement than manufacturer storage or distributor storage with package carrier delivery. |
| Order visibility | Easier to implement than other previous options. |
| Returnability | Harder and more expensive than a retail network. |
Table 4-4
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Manufacturer or Distributor Storage with Customer Pickup
Figure 4-10
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Manufacturer or Distributor Storage with Customer Pickup
| Cost Factor | Performance |
| Inventory | Can match any other option, depending on the location of inventory. |
| Transportation | Lower than the use of package carriers, especially if using an existing delivery network. |
| Facilities and handling | Facility costs can be high if new facilities have to be built. Costs are lower if existing facilities are used. The increase in handling cost at the pickup site can be significant. |
| Information | Significant investment in infrastructure required. |
Table 4-5
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Manufacturer or Distributor Storage with Customer Pickup
| Service Factor | Performance |
| Response time | Similar to package carrier delivery with manufacturer or distributor storage. Same-day delivery possible for items stored locally at pickup site. |
| Product variety | Similar to other manufacturer or distributor storage options. |
| Product availability | Similar to other manufacturer or distributor storage options. |
| Customer experience | Lower than other options because of the lack of home delivery. Experience is sensitive to capability of pickup location. |
| Time to market | Similar to manufacturer storage options. |
| Order visibility | Difficult but essential. |
| Returnability | Somewhat easier given that pickup location can handle returns. |
Table 4-5
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Retail Storage with Customer Pickup
| Cost Factor | Performance |
| Inventory | Higher than all other options. |
| Transportation | Lower than all other options. |
| Facilities and handling | Higher than other options. The increase in handling cost at the pickup site can be significant for online and phone orders. |
| Information | Some investment in infrastructure required for online and phone orders. |
Table 4-6
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Retail Storage with Customer Pickup
| Service Factor | Performance |
| Response time | Same-day (immediate) pickup possible for items stored locally at pickup site. |
| Product variety | Lower than all other options. |
| Product availability | More expensive to provide than all other options. |
| Customer experience | Related to whether shopping is viewed as a positive or negative experience by customer. |
| Time to market | Highest among distribution options. |
| Order visibility | Trivial for in-store orders. Difficult, but essential, for online and phone orders. |
| Returnability | Easier than other options because retail store can provide a substitute. |
Table 4-6
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Comparative Performance of Delivery Network Designs
Table 4-7
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Identify the best and worst network along various dimensions.
Response time: (B) retail stores (W) Manufacturer storage with direct ship
Product variety: (W) retail stores (B) Manufacturer storage with direct ship
Product availability: (W) retail store (B) Manufacturer storage
Inventory: (W) retail store (B) manufacturer storage
Transportation: (B) retail store (W) last mile delivery
Facility: (W) retail store (B) manufacturer storage
Handling: (W) Distributor storage with last mile delivery (B)
Information: Retail stores may be less complex; manufacturer storage with pickup may be very complex
Delivery Networks for Different Product/ Customer Characteristics
Table 4-8
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
When designing the delivery network we should account for product and market characteristics.
High demand products will have transportation cost play a significant role. Use network with good transportation cost (retail stores)
Very low demand products will have inventory play a significant role. Use network with low inventory costs (direct shipping)
Many product sources: transportation + information plays a role. Distributor storage with package carrier
Few product sources but high customization: manufacturer storage with merge in transit
High product variety: inventory cost will be significant. Use distributor storage
Low customer effort: Distributor storage with package carrier delivery or last mile delivery depending upon desired response time
Impact of Online Sales on Customer Service
Response time to customers
Physical products take longer to fulfill than retail store
No delay for information goods
Product variety
Easier to offer larger selection
Product availability
Aggregating inventory and better information on customer preferences improves product availability
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of Online Sales on Customer Service
Customer experience
Improved access, customization, and convenience
Faster time to market
Order Visibility
Returnability
Harder with online orders
Proportion of returns likely to be much higher
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of Online Sales on Customer Service
Direct Sales to Customers
Social networking channels allow firms to directly pitch products and promotion
Flexible Pricing, Product Portfolio, and Promotions
Manage revenues from product portfolio more effectively than traditional channels
Promotion information can be conveyed to customers quickly and inexpensively
Efficient Funds Transfer
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of Online Sales on Cost
Inventory
Lower inventory levels if customers will wait
Postpone variety until after the customer order is received
Facilities
Costs related to the number and location of facilities in a network
Costs associated with the operations in these facilities
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of Online Sales on Cost
Transportation
Lower cost of “transporting” information goods in digital form
For nondigital, aggregating inventories increases outbound transportation
Information
Share demand, planning, and forecasting information throughout its supply chain
Additional costs to build and maintain the information infrastructure
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Online Sales Scorecard
| Area | Impact |
| Response time | |
| Product variety | |
| Product availability | |
| Customer experience | |
| Time to market | |
| Order visibility | |
| Direct sales | |
| Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions | |
| Efficient funds transfer | |
| Inventory | |
| Facilities | |
| Transportation | |
| Information | |
| Key: +2 = very positive; +1 = positive; 0 = neutral; −1 = negative; −2 = very negative. |
Table 4-9
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using Online Sales to Sell Computer Hardware: Dell
Figure 4-11
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using Online Sales to Sell Computer Hardware: Dell
Impact of online sales on customer service
Delay in fulfilling customer request
Impact of online sales on cost
Reduced inventory costs
Lower facility costs
Higher total transportation costs
Incremental increase in information costs
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of Online Sales on Performance
| Area | Impact for Customized Hardware | Impact for Standard Low-Cost Hardware |
| Response time | –1 | –2 |
| Product variety | +2 | 0 |
| Product availability | +1 | +1 |
| Customer experience | +2 | +1 |
| Time to market | +2 | +1 |
| Order visibility | +1 | 0 |
| Direct sales | +2 | +1 |
| Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions | +2 | +1 |
| Efficient funds transfer | +2 | +2 |
| Inventory | +2 | +1 |
| Facilities | +2 | +1 |
| Transportation | –1 | –2 |
| Information | 0 | 0 |
Table 4-10
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using Online Sales to Sell Computer Hardware: Dell
A tailored supply chain network
A hybrid model can be very effective
More significant as hardware becomes more of a commodity
Take advantage of the strengths of both online sales and traditional retail and distribution channels
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using Online Sales to Sell Books: Amazon
Impact of online sales on customer service
Internet has not shortened supply chains
Increased selection, convenience
Impact of online sales on cost
Reduced inventory costs
Lower facility costs
Higher total transportation costs
Increase in information costs
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of Online Sales on Performance
| Area | Physical books | e-books |
| Response time | –1 | +1 |
| Product variety | +2 | +2 |
| Product availability | +1 | +2 |
| Customer experience | +1 | +1 |
| Time to market | +1 | +2 |
| Order visibility | 0 | 0 |
| Direct sales | 0 | +1 |
| Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions | +1 | +1 |
| Efficient funds transfer | 0 | 0 |
| Inventory | +1 | +2 |
| Facilities | +1 | +1 |
| Transportation | –2 | +1 |
| Information | –1 | –1 |
Table 4-11
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using Online Sales to Sell Books: Amazon
A supply chain network for books
Traditional bookstores pressured from both ends
Amazon more efficient
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using the Internet to Sell Groceries: Peapod
Impact of online sales on customer service
Sell convenience and the time savings
Offers less variety
Creating a personalized shopping experience and customized advertising and promotions
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using the Internet to Sell Groceries: Peapod
Impact of online sales on cost
Reduced inventory costs
Higher facility costs due to picking operation
Significantly higher total transportation costs
Increase in information costs
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of Online Sales on Performance
| Area | Impact |
| Response time | –1 |
| Product variety | 0 |
| Product availability | 0 |
| Customer experience | +1 |
| Time to market | 0 |
| Order visibility | –1 |
| Direct sales | 0 |
| Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions | +1 |
| Efficient funds transfer | 0 |
| Inventory | 0 |
| Facilities | –1 |
| Transportation | –2 |
| Information | –1 |
Table 4-12
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using Internet to Sell Groceries: Peapod
Value of online sales to a traditional grocery chain
Complement the strengths of their existing network
Offer an entire array of services at differing prices based on the amount of work the customer does
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using the Internet to Rent Movies: Netflix
Impact of online sales on customer service
Staggering selection and an excellent recommendation engine
Video streaming through a variety of devices
Customers received their DVDs within 24 hours of being shipped
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Using the Internet to Rent Movies: Netflix
Impact of online sales on cost
Reduced inventory costs
Lower facility costs
Considerably higher total transportation costs, increased streaming will reduce transportation costs
Increase in information costs
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of Online Sales on Performance
| Area | Impact for DVDs | Impact for Digital Content |
| Response time | –1 | +2 |
| Product variety | +2 | +2 |
| Product availability | +1 | +2 |
| Customer experience | +1 | +1 |
| Time to market | –1 | –1 |
| Order visibility | 0 | 0 |
| Direct sales | 0 | 0 |
| Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions | +1 | +1 |
| Efficient funds transfer | 0 | 0 |
| Inventory | +2 | +2 |
| Facilities | +1 | +1 |
| Transportation | –2 | 0 |
| Information | –1 | –1 |
Table 4-12
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Distribution Networks in Practice
The ownership structure of the distribution network can have as big as an impact as the type of distribution network
It is important to have adaptable distribution networks
Product price, commoditization, and criticality affect the type of distribution system preferred by customers
Integrate the Internet with the existing physical network
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Distribution Networks in Practice
Consider whether an exclusive distribution strategy is advantageous
Product, price, commoditization, and criticality have an impact on the type of distribution system preferred by customers
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Summary of Learning Objectives
Identify the key factors to be considered when designing a distribution network
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of various distribution options
Understand how online sales have affected the design of distribution networks in different industries
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
4-‹#›
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales 71
To decrease inventory costs, firms try to consolidate and limit the number of facilities in their supply chain network. For example, with fewer facilities, Amazon is able to turn its inventory about 10 times a year, whereas Barnes & Noble, with hundreds of facilities, achieves only about 3 turns per year.
Inbound transportation costs are the costs incurred in bringing material into a facility. Outbound transportation costs are the costs of sending material out of a facility. Outbound transportation costs per unit tend to be higher than inbound costs because inbound lot sizes are typically larger. For example, an Amazon warehouse receives full truckload shipments of books on the inbound side, but ships out small packages with only a few books per customer on the outbound side. Increasing the number of warehouse locations decreases the average outbound distance to the customer and makes outbound transportation distance a smaller fraction of the total distance traveled by the product. Thus, as long as inbound transportation economies of scale are maintained, increasing the number of facilities decreases total trans- portation cost, as shown in Figure 4-3. If the number of facilities is increased to a point where inbound lot sizes are also very small and result in a significant loss of economies of scale in inbound transportation, increasing the number of facilities increases total transportation cost, as shown in Figure 4-3.
Inventory Costs
Number of Facilities
FIGURE 4-2 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Inventory Costs
Transportation Cost
Number of Facilities
FIGURE 4-3 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Transportation Cost
M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 71
Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales 71
To decrease inventory costs, firms try to consolidate and limit the number of facilities in their supply chain network. For example, with fewer facilities, Amazon is able to turn its inventory about 10 times a year, whereas Barnes & Noble, with hundreds of facilities, achieves only about 3 turns per year.
Inbound transportation costs are the costs incurred in bringing material into a facility. Outbound transportation costs are the costs of sending material out of a facility. Outbound transportation costs per unit tend to be higher than inbound costs because inbound lot sizes are typically larger. For example, an Amazon warehouse receives full truckload shipments of books on the inbound side, but ships out small packages with only a few books per customer on the outbound side. Increasing the number of warehouse locations decreases the average outbound distance to the customer and makes outbound transportation distance a smaller fraction of the total distance traveled by the product. Thus, as long as inbound transportation economies of scale are maintained, increasing the number of facilities decreases total trans- portation cost, as shown in Figure 4-3. If the number of facilities is increased to a point where inbound lot sizes are also very small and result in a significant loss of economies of scale in inbound transportation, increasing the number of facilities increases total transportation cost, as shown in Figure 4-3.
Inventory Costs
Number of Facilities
FIGURE 4-2 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Inventory Costs
Transportation Cost
Number of Facilities
FIGURE 4-3 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Transportation Cost
M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 71
Facility Costs
Number of Facilities
FIGURE 4-4 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Facility Costs
72 Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales
Facility costs decrease as the number of facilities is reduced, as shown in Figure 4-4, because a consolidation of facilities allows a firm to exploit economies of scale. While Amazon achieved a property, plant, and equipment turnover (PPET) of 19 in 2009, Barnes & Noble had a PPET of just over 7.
Total logistics costs are the sum of inventory, transportation, and facility costs for a supply chain network. As the number of facilities increases, total logistics costs first decrease and then increase as shown in Figure 4-5. Each firm should have at least the number of facilities that minimizes total logistics costs. Amazon has more than one warehouse primarily to reduce its logistics costs (and improve response time). If a firm wants to reduce the response time to its customers further, it may have to increase the number of facilities beyond the point that minimizes logistics costs. A firm should add facilities beyond the cost-minimizing point only if managers are confident that the increase in revenues because of better responsiveness is greater than the increase in costs because of the additional facilities.
Response Time
Number of Facilities
Total Logistics Cost
FIGURE 4-5 Variation in Logistics Cost and Response Time with Number of Facilities
M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 72
Facility Costs
Number of Facilities
FIGURE 4-4 Relationship Between Number of Facilities and Facility Costs
72 Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales
Facility costs decrease as the number of facilities is reduced, as shown in Figure 4-4, because a consolidation of facilities allows a firm to exploit economies of scale. While Amazon achieved a property, plant, and equipment turnover (PPET) of 19 in 2009, Barnes & Noble had a PPET of just over 7.
Total logistics costs are the sum of inventory, transportation, and facility costs for a supply chain network. As the number of facilities increases, total logistics costs first decrease and then increase as shown in Figure 4-5. Each firm should have at least the number of facilities that minimizes total logistics costs. Amazon has more than one warehouse primarily to reduce its logistics costs (and improve response time). If a firm wants to reduce the response time to its customers further, it may have to increase the number of facilities beyond the point that minimizes logistics costs. A firm should add facilities beyond the cost-minimizing point only if managers are confident that the increase in revenues because of better responsiveness is greater than the increase in costs because of the additional facilities.
Response Time
Number of Facilities
Total Logistics Cost
FIGURE 4-5 Variation in Logistics Cost and Response Time with Number of Facilities
M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 72
The blank B2C online sales scorecard shown in Table 4-9 can be used by a firm to summarize the impact of online sales on each of the areas identified earlier.
The value of setting up online sales is not the same in every industry. Whereas Amazon and Blue Nile have seen their profits increase after going online, Webvan and many other online grocers have gone out of business. The scorecard in Table 4-9 can be used to understand how online sales affect the performance of different supply chain networks. In the next section, we apply the online sales scorecard to several examples.
Using Online Sales to Sell Computer Hardware: Dell
The online channel has proved very effective for the sale of computer hardware and by 2009 represented about half the sales in this category. After more than a decade of tremendous success selling its PCs only online, Dell started to sell PCs through retail stores such as Wal-Mart in 2007. Since about 2005, Apple has had considerable success selling its phones and computers through retail stores. This raises the question of the relative value of the online channel and retail stores for selling computer hardware.
To make this comparison, we compare Dell’s supply chain for each channel. As shown in Figure 4-11, when using the online channel, Dell typically starts assembly after receiving a
Chapter 4 • Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to Online Sales 89
Pull Retail Store
Dell
Supplier
Dell’s Retail Supply Chain
Customer
Dell
Supplier
Dell’s Online Supply Chain
Pull Customer
FIGURE 4-11 Supply Chains for Dell’s Online and Retail Channels
Table 4-9 The Online Sales Scorecard Area Impact
Response time
Product variety
Product availability
Customer experience
Time to market
Order visibility
Direct sales
Flexible pricing, portfolio, promotions
Efficient funds transfer
Inventory
Facilities
Transportation
Information
Key: +2 = very positive; +1 = positive; 0 = neutral; !1 = negative; !2 = very negative.
M04_CHOP3952_05_SE_C04.QXD 10/17/11 8:03 PM Page 89