NUTRITION RESEARCH PAPER TOPIC: Obesity among adolescents
Kemal2020
ChildhoodObesity_1.pdf
Addressing Childhood Obesity: Opportunities for Prevention
Callie L. Brown, MD1, Elizabeth E. Halvorson, MD2, Gail M. Cohen, MD, MS2,3, Suzanne Lazorick, MD, MPH4,5,6, and Joseph A. Skelton, MD, MS2,3,7
1Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
2Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
3Brenner FIT (Families In Training) Program, Brenner Children's Hospital, Winston-Salem, NC
4Department of Pediatrics, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
5Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
6East Carolina University Pediatric Healthy Weight Research and Treatment Center, Greenville, NC
7Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
Keywords
etiology; prevention; obesity; risk factors; pediatric; genetics; overweight
INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of obesity in the United States remains dangerously high, at nearly 10%
among infants and toddlers, 17% of children and teens, and more than 30% of adults1,2.
While the prevalence has stabilized somewhat over the past few years1, rates of severe
obesity have continued to climb, particularly in high-risk populations3. Intervening during
childhood is important due to the persistence of obesity into adulthood with associated
increased morbidity and mortality4–7. Comorbidities often affect children before they reach
adulthood, requiring increased diligence in evaluating and treating these conditions8–10 and
leading to increased healthcare expenditures11,12. The personal and emotional face of
childhood obesity is also serious: daily quality of life can be significantly worsened by
Address correspondence to: Joseph Skelton, MD Department of Pediatrics Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd. Winston-Salem, NC 27157 Tel: (336) 713-2348 Fax: (336) 716-9699 [email protected]. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
The authors have no other financial disclosures to make.
HHS Public Access Author manuscript Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015 October ; 62(5): 1241–1261. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2015.05.013.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
obesity13. The psychosocial complications of obesity include depression, body
dissatisfaction, unhealthy weight control behaviors, stigmatization, and poor self-esteem13.
Groups have advocated for the prevention of obesity for some time, yet efforts to advance
preventative interventions may have been limited by the difficulties and expense of long-
term studies of a complex problem and increasing focus on treatments. Despite the progress
over the past 20 years, there is not a clear solution or “one-size-fits-all” approach. The body
of literature on proven prevention interventions is not robust, though cross-sectional and
associational studies have identified risk factors to address, and practical experience has
provided a foundation upon which to work with children and families. Childhood obesity is
incredibly complex and reflects numerous systems that impact a child's health. Repetition of
concepts can aid in approaching an issue as complex as childhood obesity; the Ecological
Model of Childhood Obesity (Figure 1) provides a broad framework for understanding the
mediators and moderators of childhood obesity. This overview highlights evidence-based
factors on which clinicians can focus efforts to effectively prevent the development of
childhood obesity. In this chapter, we will review both general and age-specific risk factors
for pediatric obesity and discuss specific strategies for intervention at the level of the
pediatrician, school, government, and family.
RISK FACTORS
Genetic Risk Factors
Obesity is commonly known to “run in families.” The genetic contribution to this
observation is difficult to discern, however, as families usually share not only genetic
material but environments and habits as well. Obesity in children correlates with obesity in
their parents, and the level of obesity in children increases when both parents are obese, as
well as with increasing levels of obesity in the parents15. Indeed, it has been shown that
parental overweight is the most significant risk factor for childhood overweight 16.
Children's food choices and eating behaviors are learned from parents at very young ages
and influence eating behaviors as children get older 17,18.
Although the vast majority of cases of childhood obesity are exogenous, a small proportion
may have endogenous causes. The following genetic disorders, both syndromic as well as
monogenic in origin, predispose children to obesity:
• Syndromes: trisomy 21, Prader-Willi syndrome, Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy, Cohen syndrome, Bardet-Biedl syndromes, Alstrom syndrome, and
WAGR (Wilms' tumor, aniridia, genitourinary anomalies, and retardation) 19,20.
• Monogenic disorders: leptin deficiency, leptin receptor mutations, proopiomelanocortin deficiency, preproconvertase deficiency, and melanocortin 4
receptor mutations19.
• Hormonal disorders: hypothyroidism, growth hormone deficiency, Cushing's syndrome, hypothalamic obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, and
hyperprolactinemia19.
Brown et al. Page 2
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Environmental/Societal Risk Factors: The child's living environment, both in the home as well as in the community, can contribute to a higher risk of development of obesity:
• Living in lower-income, predominantly white, or non-mixed-race neighborhoods21.
• Parents' perceptions of the food and physical activity environments in their neighborhoods
• Difficulty getting to a main food store or difficulty purchasing fruits and vegetables there (food desert)
• Increased distance from parks
• Perceived danger of their neighborhood21
• Food insecurity, although the evidence is mixed21,22
Behavioral Risk Factors
Nutrition and Diet—Although it might seem logical that increased total energy intake should be associated with a higher risk of childhood obesity, the evidence does not support
this relationship 16,23. Similarly, the relationship between dietary fat intake and childhood
obesity is not clearly established23. A lower intake of dairy products or calcium is associated
with childhood obesity, but the data regarding intake of fruits and vegetables is mixed and
does not indicate a strong association with childhood weight status 23,24. Beverage choice
may increase risk for childhood obesity: fruit juice, especially in large quantities 23; sugar-
sweetened beverages 23,25; and sodas 23,26,27 are all positively associated with childhood
obesity.
Some specific eating behaviors have been associated with childhood obesity. Skipping
breakfast 23,28,29; eating meals away from home, especially fast food 23; quicker eating
pace30; larger portion sizes 23; and eating in the absence of hunger 30 are all positively
associated with childhood obesity. No consistent association has been identified with
frequent snacking23,31, while eating meals as a family is inversely associated with childhood
obesity22,23.
While there can be conflicting evidence, or less-than-clear associations, clinicians can be
confident in addressing intake of unhealthy foods, such as fast food, sugar-sweetened
beverages, high-fat proteins and processed snacks, and encourage intake of healthy items,
particularly fruits, vegetables, lean meats, and sugar-free beverages. Underneath the intake
of these foods are the habits behind them, which the clinician should be cognizant of during
an interaction: foods eaten away from home, eating in the absence of hunger, snacking and
family meals. Awareness of these issues can assist clinicians in working with families to
prevent the development of unhealthy habits and build healthy ones to prevent excessive
weight gain.
Physical Activity—Overall, decreased physical activity among children is associated with obesity 16,23,32,33. Prospective studies objectively measuring physical activity have yielded
inconsistent results; however, studies of either self-reported or parent-reported physical
activity have demonstrated an inverse relationship between physical activity and both
Brown et al. Page 3
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
childhood and future adult obesity 32. An inverse relationship exists between some specific
activity-related behaviors and childhood obesity, including sports team participation and
active commuting to school 34.
Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors are likely associated with childhood
obesity 23,27,32, although the effect size may be small 16. Some prospective studies have
found that more hours engaged in sedentary behavior, specifically watching TV or playing
video games, was associated with an increased risk of becoming obese in the future 23,32;
however, other studies found no association between sedentary behavior and childhood
obesity35. Increased screen time, including television35 and electronic devices 36, is also
associated with childhood obesity. While increased sedentary time and decreased physical
activity are both associated with childhood obesity, they may not be inversely proportional.
Regardless, efforts to lower the former and increase the latter will be key to preventing
obesity development.
Sleep—While there is less evidence regarding sleep, it does appear that shorter sleep duration is associated with childhood obesity 22,37. Some prospective studies have borne out
this association, both in the short term in young children 38 and in the long term, persisting
into adulthood 39. In combination with other positive household routines (eating as a family
and limiting screen time), obtaining adequate sleep has a strong inverse relationship with
obesity among preschool-aged children 40.
Stress—The short- and long-term effects of stress on the development of obesity are an emerging area for research. There are several types of stress that can affect a child: personal,
parental, and family. Each of these can increase the child's risk for obesity independently or
in concert. Although the data is somewhat mixed, it is likely that there is a positive
association between chronic stress and the risk of childhood obesity 41. This can manifest
during childhood42 and may persist into adulthood43. In many studies, parental stress is
associated with obesity in children; this relationship is strengthened when a parent
experiences stress from more than one source41. Similarly, stress within the family is also
associated with childhood obesity41 (Box 1).
DEVELOPMENTAL APPROACH TO OBESITY PREVENTION
Many of the risk factors outlined above, related to diet, physical and sedentary activity, and
sleep, apply to children of many different ages. Other risk factors for pediatric obesity may
apply at distinct development stages, offering specific opportunities for intervention by a
primary care provider. These stage-specific risk factors have been identified as early as the
prenatal period. While obesity in either parent may increase the child's risk, as discussed
above, the mother's pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain have been directly
associated with obesity in infancy and early childhood44–47. Maintaining gestational weight
gain within the Institute of Medicine guidelines48 (see Table 1) is especially important for
women who are overweight or obese at the time of conception and should be an important
component of prenatal counseling. Both over- and under-nutrition at this stage are thought to
affect fetal programming and predispose to future obesity and metabolic disorders19,49. One
recent meta-analysis identified a moderate association between delivery via cesarean section
Brown et al. Page 4
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
and offspring obesity, with persistence of the association into adulthood50. In addition,
maternal exposure to tobacco45,51,52 and caffeine53 have both been associated with obesity
at various points during gestation and throughout a child's life.
Additional risk factors become evident in infancy. High birth weight and rapid infant weight
gain correlate with future childhood obesity45, although they may be difficult to address
specifically as modifiable risk factors. Many studies have attempted to determine optimal
dietary intake during infancy, but the results are conflicting. While many studies suggest that
breastfeeding is protective against the development of obesity45,54,55, others show no
relationship56,57. These differing results may be due to confounders present in the study; for
example, it has been shown that lower protein content in infant formula is protective against
obesity at 6 years, so studies on breastfeeding may differ based on the types of formula used
by control infants. Results have also been mixed when assessing the effects of duration of
breastfeeding45. It has been suggested that it is the infant's degree of self-regulation while
breastfeeding rather than the composition of breastmilk which may be protective, so that
bottle-feeding either formula or pumped breastmilk may be associated with increased risk58.
Complementary foods represent another important dietary change during infancy, and both
the timing of introduction and food selection may impact future risk of obesity. Early
introduction of solids (defined as ages <3 to 5 months depending on the study) may be
associated with increased childhood overweight59. Similarly, one systematic review
concludes that higher intake of protein and energy during infancy can be associated with
increased BMI60, although other studies conclude that no specific complementary foods are
associated with increased risk61. Overall, the available evidence makes it difficult to
establish firm guidelines for infants' dietary intake.
Other exposures in infancy have also been investigated. Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics,
especially with repeated exposures prior to 23 months of age, has a small but significant
association with obesity in early childhood62. Studies have yielded mixed results for family
socioeconomic status, maternal parity, and maternal marital status45. Finally, temperament
traits identified as early as infancy, especially early negativity and lack of self-regulation,
may predispose to later obesity63,64.
Child temperament and parental feeding practices remain important predictors of obesity for
toddlers and preschool-aged children. The concerning character traits are thought to be
similar to those seen in infancy, particularly poor self-regulation and distress to
limitations64. Part of the mechanism of this association may reflect parental response to the
child's temperament, especially if parents initiate restrictive feeding practices given concerns
over self-regulation or use emotional feeding habits, such as providing obesogenic foods to
soothe a negative child61,64. Children are typically weaned from the bottle as toddlers; the
timing of this transition may affect obesity risk. At earlier ages (between 12–36 months),
there is an association between current bottle use and obesity, but this was not seen at later
ages (37–60 months)65. Furthermore, an intervention centered on bottle-weaning effectively
reduced total caloric intake in children but did not change overweight status66, so the degree
to which prolonged bottle use contributes to obesity risk is unclear.
Brown et al. Page 5
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Although sedentary behavior and screen time are concerns for children of all ages, one
systematic review suggests that preschool children are most amenable to interventions
addressing this risk factor67. Weight gain in this age group is known to be highly predictive
of later obesity, with an earlier adiposity rebound (at less than 5 years old) associated with
both BMI and adiposity at age 15 years68. Therefore, this is an important age group to target
as effective interventions are identified.
Most studies of obesity in school-aged children focus on interventions delivered within the
school system, which will be discussed later under Policy and Environmental Interventions.
However, some research has shown that children with overweight and obesity actually gain
more weight during the summer months than during the school year69,70, suggesting that
interventions outside of school should also be investigated. The primary difference noted
between the school year and summertime is in the level of physical activity70. One
intervention that has shown success in increasing physical activity in this age group, as well
as adolescents, is exergaming, or use of electronic games designed to promote physical
exercise71. While the video game experience makes activity more entertaining for children,
use of exergames in several studies was found to increase energy expenditure and time spent
on physical activity and to reduce waist circumference71. These findings suggest that
targeting known risk factors during the summer months may be especially important for
obesity prevention at this age.
Use of technology for obesity prevention continues to be important in the adolescent age
group. Technology-based interventions targeting both diet and exercise have been shown to
be effective in this population, although there is wide variation among studies72. Peer groups
also take on increased importance during adolescence, and research has attempted to
determine how this influences the risk of obesity. Peers are able to influence diet and
activity levels in both positive and negative ways73,74, so the inclusion of the peer group in
interventions targeting adolescents is important74.
Adolescence is a time of significant biological changes, most notably puberty. While there is
a clear association between early puberty and obesity, it is difficult to determine cause and
effect since pre-pubertal BMI influences the timing of puberty49. Some studies have
demonstrated an effect of early puberty on subsequent adiposity and fat distribution, but
results have been mixed49. Severe obesity in adolescence has been directly associated with
poor health outcomes in adulthood75, which makes prevention in this age group especially
important. In addition, as they represent the next generation of parents, establishment of
healthy lifestyle habits in the adolescent population has the potential to decrease the obesity
risk of subsequent generations (Box 2).
ROLE OF THE PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER
Primary care providers play a unique role in the prevention of obesity as they see the same
patients and families, often from birth, on a regular basis (Box 3). This gives them the
opportunity to provide anticipatory guidance and counseling that can influence families'
nutrition and physical activity habits. As discussed above, it is well established that there are
strong familial links to obesity, both genetic15,16 and environmental18. These influences do
Brown et al. Page 6
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
not dictate fate, however. By recognizing risk factors early in a child's life, primary care
providers can help families make positive changes that will improve a child's weight
trajectory76.
Pediatricians should screen for obesity by measuring height and weight and calculating BMI
at least annually77–79. By following children closely over time, physicians are in the position
to detect weight problems by observing trends, such as a rapidly increasing BMI, even
before a child becomes overweight. When a child is discovered to be overweight or at risk
for becoming overweight, physicians should provide brief counseling and suggest weight
control interventions77,79. We recommend that clinicians use motivational interviewing
techniques (see Figure 2)77,80–83 when counseling patients and their families about making
life changes.
Primary care providers offer anticipatory guidance about nutrition and physical activity at
each well child check. This anticipatory guidance should be age appropriate and can
significantly shape how and what parents feed their children. All children, even those of a
healthy weight, benefit from counseling about general health and wellness, and this does not
need to be framed around weight. Recommended anticipatory guidance for each age range is
outlined in table 1 23,32,77,84–95.
Primary care providers should advocate for their patients and families; to build community-
wide efforts to prevent obesity, clinicians can look to successful models in other areas to
support their efforts. The chronic care model96 provides a useful framework for
pediatricians to provide care to children who are overweight or obese. The chronic care
model recognizes that families' self-management is dependent on support both from the
medical system and their surrounding environment, such as school, work, and the
community. Ideally, primary care physicians should be connected with numerous
community resources, such as nutrition and exercise programs77,96. The chronic care model
has been successfully implemented by health-related organizations such as Kaiser
Permanente, that provided education for providers in motivational interviewing, and
Wellpoint, that distributed parental toolkits to families in clinic77.
Advocating for children's health and healthcare is an important role for pediatricians to
embrace on both a local and national level, examples of areas for advocacy include:
• Third-party reimbursement to ensure that children continue to have access to services necessary for obesity prevention and treatment, such as yearly BMI
screening and well-visits with their primary care provider
• Funding for research to prevent childhood obesity
• Promotion of healthy foods and beverages and physical activities in schools and daycares
• Maintenance of safe neighborhoods that encourage physical activity
• Availability of healthy food26
Brown et al. Page 7
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
POLICY AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERVENTIONS
Using the Socio-ecologic Model as a guide14 on a societal level, policy and environmental
interventions have the potential to exert the farthest-reaching influence in thwarting
obesity97. Policy changes can address physical, economic, social or communication factors
and may range in scope of efforts that target:
• A whole population: national or state legislation; industry-wide improvements; social marketing), or
• Population subsets or large groups: state or regional ordinances, or
• Local or smaller groups: single organization or community98.
Policies can be formal documented standards or laws, or informal practices (e.g. a medical
office giving patients stickers vs. candy). The over-arching goals are for policies to prevent
obesity by: 1) increasing awareness of and actions to change attitudes and norms to support
healthy energy balance; 2) making healthy options for physical activity and nutrition readily
available and, where possible, the default choices; and 3) reducing barriers to making
healthy choices.
For maximal impact, policy changes should be informed by the existing science of obesity
prevention and established theories of behavior change, such as Social Cognitive Theory99,
Self-Determination Theory100, and/or the Trans Theoretical Model of Behavior Change101,
and subsequently evaluated by rigorous studies demonstrating both feasibility and
effectiveness. Optimally, studies of policy are thoroughly evaluated with application of
appropriate methods such as the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation
and Maintenance) framework102. Where large studies have not been completed, efforts
should be evidence-informed and practice-tested103. Once enacted, there should be ongoing
monitoring of fidelity and accountability of policies for effectiveness and use of resources,
with attention to social factors that contribute to inequality in access to healthy choices.
Although the body of literature assessing polices for obesity prevention is growing, there are
still many areas actively under study or for which evidence is inadequate for a definitive
recommendation for wide scale adoption98,104.
Select examples illustrative of policies with growing support and/or evidence and ranging in
scope are shown in Table 2, and for specific settings in which children spend substantial
time are shown in Table 3
Notable recent progress in the policy arena has occurred in standards for food programs
affecting children including application of the 2010 United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Dietary Guidelines for Americans to schools109 and science–based nutrition
standards for meals offered in daycare and after-school programs through the pending Child
and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). These changes are largely a result of passage of
the Healthy and Hunger-free Child Act of 2010 that was motivated in large-part to curb the
obesity epidemic110. The Act included several components to ensure meals served to
children include more fruits and vegetables, whole grains, and less sugar and fat, while also
promoting breastfeeding and increasing access to healthy beverages (water, low-fat or fat
Brown et al. Page 8
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
free milk). Related changes are evident in the revised food package offered to participant in
the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program since 2007 and broadening of educational
messages and materials supported by the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Education
Program (SNAP-Ed) Programs to include emphasis on energy balance and obesity
prevention.
Despite progress in recent decades, there remain many areas for which evidence is
insufficient or policies are lacking, emerging or facing challenges97. Although there are
signs of growing partnership, remaining barriers include involvement of the food industry,
marketing, and entertainment venues along with pervasive social and cultural attitudes and
influences. Resistance may exist due to factors such as economic pressures or underlying
fundamental political or philosophical tension between government vs. individual/parent
rights and freedom of choice. Some barriers may be reduced as more evidence demonstrates
links between academic performance and health/obesity status or health behaviors (to
support policy changes in the school setting) or the economic benefits of a healthier
population/workforce to factors such as defense preparedness and economic measures (to
support changes in business and industry).
Pediatricians, primary care providers and any professional or individual with an interest in
obesity prevention for children can actively support efforts in policy or environmental
changes through lending expertise, providing advocacy or local support, or by leading and
role modeling in one's own work setting and community (Box 4).
THE FAMILY
While environmental pressures at the national and community level contribute greatly to a
child's risk of obesity, “families are the most central and enduring influence in children's
lives… The health and well-being of children are inextricably linked to their parents'
physical, emotional and social health, social circumstances, and child-rearing practices”
(Schor 2003, page 1542)111. Inclusion of the family is established as the gold standard of
treatment77. The same can and should be said for the prevention of obesity. As mentioned
previously, a child's risk of obesity is greatly influenced by parental weight status. While the
genetic contribution to the child's weight is great, the environmental influence is likely
greater: parental obesity can predict genetic susceptibility, but a child's environment can
determine the expression and severity of that risk112. Despite any genetic predisposition to
obesity, the environment is likely the greatest potentially modifiable determinant of obesity,
with the family being the most proximate of that environment. Determining exact familial
components contributing to a child's weight is difficult, however, given the changing nature
of families over the past few decades, and the complexity of studying and conceptualizing
families113. As presently understood, family-related risk-factors for childhood obesity
include114:
• Minority ethnic and cultural background
• Single parent household
• Lower maternal education
Brown et al. Page 9
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
• Parent obesity status and family history of obesity
• Poverty: receipt of supplemental food assistance
• Higher levels of television viewing of family, particularly during meals, amounts and locations (bedrooms)
• Restrictive parental feeding practices
Of the risk factors above (out of a total of 22 studied), parental feeding practices and parent
BMI were most associated with child weight status (child sleep duration was also
determined to be significantly associated)114. These findings are preliminary, as the
extensive, long-term studies necessary to link risk with later obesity development have not
yet been performed. Clinicians should customize risk assessments to each family, knowing
that sound anticipatory guidance can be safely provided to all families regardless of weight
status and risk for later obesity.
Parenting styles and the risk of childhood obesity have been investigated extensively, though
there are many areas still in need of study. As with many aspects of complex problems, such
as childhood obesity, long-term definitive studies are lacking. However, research over the
past decade has provided useful information about this interaction.115,116,117,118,119.
Parenting styles are based on two dimensions of parenting: (1) demandingness, or demand
for child self-control and (2) responsiveness, or sensitivity and emotional involvement. With
a 2×2 table, this gives four distinct parenting styles: authoritative, authoritarian, permissive,
and neglectful (Table 4). Authoritative parents had children with the lowest prevalence of
obesity in Rhee's study of 1st graders, while authoritarian, or strict disciplinarian, parents
had children with the highest prevalence of obesity, more than even permissive or neglectful
parents. These findings are important, as parents of children with obesity could be more
likely to institute dieting or restrictive behaviors to help their children lose weight. While
this has not been proven or extensively studied, it provides guidance to clinicians and
parents encouraging an authoritative approach to parenting, and specifically feeding, their
children. A non-restrictive approach to early childhood feeding, while providing structure
and healthy meals, is important for parents of young children to ensure healthy eating habits.
The bulk of parenting research and prevention of childhood obesity relates to early
childhood feeding, though many principles can likely be extended to older age groups.
Analysis of an older study identified the importance of healthy parenting skills, even if the
focus is not obesity or weight-related behaviors120. Brotman et al reviewed outcomes of
children at high risk for behavioral problems and high risk for obesity120. These children
and their parents were part of an intervention aimed to improve parenting skills at age 4,
then followed for 3–5 years. The intervention group had significantly lower prevalence of
obesity as well as healthier nutrition and activity habits than control groups, despite the
intervention not having a focus on nutrition, activity, or weight. Another representation of
the importance of family is the influence of regular family meals, which appear to improve
the nutritional status and weight of children121, and “bleeds over” to improve family
relationships and decrease risky behaviors122. Positive interaction between members during
family meals may contribute just as much to these positive outcomes as changes in
nutritional intake121.
Brown et al. Page 10
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Despite this promising research, there are no clear answers on how to become an “obesity-
resistant family.” Future research must account for the complexity of families and may
utilize established approaches, such as family systems theory, which views the family as
more than the sum of its parts and respects its complex dynamics and function113. Increasing
focus on family dynamics and communication will be key to successfully preventing
childhood obesity within the context of the family (Box 5).
SUMMARY
Childhood obesity is a complex medical issue, representing the interplay of physical and
environmental factors. The neuroendocrine control of weight includes multiple situations
where genetic variation can influence a person's weight status. Unfortunately, the unhealthy
evolution of food and activity environments has placed children at a higher risk for obesity
and associated weight problems than they ever have been before. Although significantly
more research is needed to optimize these strategies, interventions at the level of the
pediatrician, school, government, and family have shown success in the prevention of
childhood obesity.
Acknowledgments
Support: Supported in part by a grant from NICHD/NIH Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award K23 HD061597 (JAS) and from the Health Recourses and Service Administration National Research Service Award (NRSA) grant T32 HP14001 (CLB).
REFERENCES
1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014; 311(8):806–814. [PubMed: 24570244]
2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014; 311(8):806–814. [PubMed: 24570244]
3. Skinner AC, Skelton JA. Prevalence and Trends in Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Children in the United States, 1999–2012. JAMA pediatrics. 2014
4. Field AE, Cook NR, Gillman MW. Weight status in childhood as a predictor of becoming overweight or hypertensive in early adulthood. Obes Res. 2005; 13(1):163–169. [PubMed: 15761176]
5. Guo SS, Wu W, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Predicting overweight and obesity in adulthood from body mass index values in childhood and adolescence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 76(3):653–658. [PubMed: 12198014]
6. Inge TH, King WC, Jenkins TM, et al. The effect of obesity in adolescence on adult health status. Pediatrics. 2013; 132(6):1098–1104. [PubMed: 24249816]
7. Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH. Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(13):869–873. [PubMed: 9302300]
8. Kim G, Caprio S. Diabetes and insulin resistance in pediatric obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011; 58(6):1355–1361. ix. [PubMed: 22093855]
9. Cook S, Kavey RE. Dyslipidemia and pediatric obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011; 58(6):1363– 1373. ix. [PubMed: 22093856]
10. Mencin AA, Lavine JE. Advances in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011; 58(6):1375–1392. x. [PubMed: 22093857]
11. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011; 378(9793):815–825. [PubMed: 21872750]
Brown et al. Page 11
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
12. Cawley J. The economics of childhood obesity. Health affairs. 2010; 29(3):364–371. [PubMed: 20194974]
13. Vander Wal JS, Mitchell ER. Psychological complications of pediatric obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011; 58(6):1393–1401. x. [PubMed: 22093858]
14. Davison KK, Birch LL. Childhood overweight: a contextual model and recommendations for future research. Obesity reviews. 2001; 2(3):159–171. [PubMed: 12120101]
15. Garn SM, Clark DC, Lowe CU, et al. Trends in fatness and the origins of obesity. Pediatrics. 1976; 57(4):443–456. [PubMed: 1264536]
16. Agras WS, Mascola AJ. Risk factors for childhood overweight. Current opinion in pediatrics. 2005; 17(5):648–652. [PubMed: 16160542]
17. Birch LL, Fisher JO. Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1998; 101(Supplement 2):539–549. [PubMed: 12224660]
18. Birch LL, Davison KK. Family environmental factors influencing the developing behavioral controls of food intake and childhood overweight. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2001; 48(4):893–907. [PubMed: 11494642]
19. Savona-Ventura C, Savona-Ventura S. The inheritance of obesity. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014
20. Mason K, Page L, Balikcioglu PG. Screening for Hormonal, Monogenic, and Syndromic Disorders in Obese Infants and Children. Pediatric annals. 2014; 43(9):e218–e224. [PubMed: 25198446]
21. Ohri-Vachaspati P, DeLia D, DeWeese RS, Crespo NC, Todd M, Yedidia MJ. The relative contribution of layers of the Social Ecological Model to childhood obesity. Public health nutrition. 2014:1–12.
22. Ogata BN, Hayes D. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition Guidance for Healthy Children Ages 2 to 11 Years. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2014; 114(8):1257–1276. [PubMed: 25060139]
23. Davis MM, Gance-Cleveland B, Hassink S, Johnson R, Paradis G, Resnicow K. Recommendations for prevention of childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(Suppl 4):S229–253. [PubMed: 18055653]
24. Field AE, Gillman MW, Rosner B, Rockett HR, Colditz GA. Association between fruit and vegetable intake and change in body mass index among a large sample of children and adolescents in the United States. International journal of obesity. 2003; 27(7):821–826. [PubMed: 12821968]
25. Pan L, Li R, Park S, Galuska DA, Sherry B, Freedman DS. A longitudinal analysis of sugar- sweetened beverage intake in infancy and obesity at 6 years. Pediatrics. 2014; 134(Supplement 1):S29–S35. [PubMed: 25183752]
26. Lee V. Promising strategies for creating healthy eating and active living environments. Convergence Partnership. 2011
27. Seo D-C, King MH, Kim N, Sovinski D, Meade R, Lederer AM. Predictors for Persistent Overweight, Deteriorated Weight Status, and Improved Weight Status During 18 Months in a School-Based Longitudinal Cohort. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2014
28. Gleason PM, Dodd AH. School breakfast program but not school lunch program participation is associated with lower body mass index. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2009; 109(2):S118–S128. [PubMed: 19166666]
29. Timlin MT, Pereira MA, Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D. Breakfast eating and weight change in a 5-year prospective analysis of adolescents: Project EAT (Eating Among Teens). Pediatrics. 2008; 121(3):e638–e645. [PubMed: 18310183]
30. Obregón AM, Pettinelli PP, Santos JL. Childhood obesity and eating behaviour. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014
31. Larson N, Story M. A review of snacking patterns among children and adolescents: what are the implications of snacking for weight status? Childhood Obesity. 2013; 9(2):104–115. [PubMed: 23470091]
32. Must A, Tybor D. Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a review of longitudinal studies of weight and adiposity in youth. International Journal of Obesity. 2005; 29:S84–S96. [PubMed: 16385758]
Brown et al. Page 12
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
33. Chaput JP, Lambert M, Mathieu ME, Tremblay M, O'Loughlin J, Tremblay A. Physical activity vs. sedentary time: independent associations with adiposity in children. Pediatric obesity. 2012; 7(3): 251–258. [PubMed: 22461356]
34. Drake KM, Beach ML, Longacre MR, et al. Influence of sports, physical education, and active commuting to school on adolescent weight status. Pediatrics. 2012; 130(2):e296–e304. [PubMed: 22802608]
35. Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2011; 8(1):98. [PubMed: 21936895]
36. Chahal H, Fung C, Kuhle S, Veugelers P. Availability and night time use of electronic entertainment and communication devices are associated with short sleep duration and obesity among Canadian children. Pediatric obesity. 2013; 8(1):42–51. [PubMed: 22962067]
37. Appelhans BM, Fitzpatrick SL, Li H, et al. The home environment and childhood obesity in low- income households: indirect effects via sleep duration and screen time. BMC public health. 2014; 14(1):1160. [PubMed: 25381553]
38. Bell JF, Zimmerman FJ. Shortened nighttime sleep duration in early life and subsequent childhood obesity. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2010; 164(9):840–845. [PubMed: 20819966]
39. Al Mamun A, Lawlor DA, Cramb S, O'Callaghan M, Williams G, Najman J. Do childhood sleeping problems predict obesity in young adulthood? Evidence from a prospective birth cohort study. American journal of epidemiology. 2007; 166(12):1368–1373. [PubMed: 17855389]
40. Anderson SE, Whitaker RC. Household routines and obesity in US preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2010; 125(3):420–428. [PubMed: 20142280]
41. Wilson SM, Sato AF. Stress and paediatric obesity: What we know and where to go. Stress and Health. 2014; 30(2):91–102. [PubMed: 23818395]
42. Evans GW, Fuller-Rowell TE, Doan SN. Childhood cumulative risk and obesity: the mediating role of self-regulatory ability. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(1):e68–e73. [PubMed: 22144695]
43. Fuemmeler BF, Dedert E, McClernon FJ, Beckham JC. Adverse childhood events are associated with obesity and disordered eating: Results from a US population-based survey of young adults. Journal of traumatic stress. 2009; 22(4):329–333. [PubMed: 19588510]
44. Heerman WJ, Bian A, Shintani A, Barkin SL. Interaction between maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain shapes infant growth. Academic pediatrics. 2014; 14(5): 463–470. [PubMed: 25169157]
45. Weng SF, Redsell SA, Swift JA, Yang M, Glazebrook CP. Systematic review and meta-analyses of risk factors for childhood overweight identifiable during infancy. Archives of disease in childhood. 2012; 97(12):1019–1026. [PubMed: 23109090]
46. Yu Z, Han S, Zhu J, Sun X, Ji C, Guo X. Pre-pregnancy body mass index in relation to infant birth weight and offspring overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2013; 8(4):e61627. [PubMed: 23613888]
47. Lau EY, Liu J, Archer E, McDonald SM, Liu J. Maternal Weight Gain in Pregnancy and Risk of Obesity among Offspring: A Systematic Review. Journal of obesity. 2014; 2014
48. Medicine, Io; Medicine, Io. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. The National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2009.
49. Adair LS. Child and adolescent obesity: epidemiology and developmental perspectives. Physiology & behavior. 2008; 94(1):8–16. [PubMed: 18191968]
50. Li H, Zhou Y, Liu J. The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Obesity. 2012; 37(7):893–899. [PubMed: 23207407]
51. Møller SE, Ajslev TA, Andersen CS, Dalgård C, Sørensen TI. Risk of childhood overweight after exposure to tobacco smoking in prenatal and early postnatal life. PloS one. 2014; 9(10):e109184. [PubMed: 25310824]
52. Oken E, Levitan E, Gillman M. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and child overweight: systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of obesity. 2007; 32(2):201–210. [PubMed: 18278059]
Brown et al. Page 13
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
53. Li D, Ferber J, Odouli R. Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy and risk of obesity in offspring: a prospective cohort study. International Journal of Obesity. 2014
54. Imai CM, Gunnarsdottir I, Thorisdottir B, Halldorsson TI, Thorsdottir I. Associations between Infant Feeding Practice Prior to Six Months and Body Mass Index at Six Years of Age. Nutrients. 2014; 6(4):1608–1617. [PubMed: 24747694]
55. Oddy WH, Mori TA, Huang R-C, et al. Early infant feeding and adiposity risk: from infancy to adulthood. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2014; 64(3–4):262–270. [PubMed: 25300269]
56. Vehapoglu A, Demir AD, Turkmen S, Nursoy M, Ozkaya E. Early infant feeding practice and childhood obesity: the relation of breast-feeding and timing of solid food introduction with childhood obesity. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014; 27(11–12):1181– 1187. [PubMed: 25153224]
57. Jing H, Xu H, Wan J, et al. Effect of Breastfeeding on Childhood BMI and Obesity: The China Family Panel Studies. Medicine. 2014; 93(10):e55. [PubMed: 25170931]
58. Li R, Fein SB, Grummer-Strawn LM. Do infants fed from bottles lack self-regulation of milk intake compared with directly breastfed infants? Pediatrics. 2010; 125(6):e1386–e1393. [PubMed: 20457676]
59. Pearce J, Langley-Evans S. The types of food introduced during complementary feeding and risk of childhood obesity: a systematic review. International Journal of Obesity. 2013; 37(4):477–485. [PubMed: 23399778]
60. Pearce J, Taylor M, Langley-Evans S. Timing of the introduction of complementary feeding and risk of childhood obesity: a systematic review. International Journal of Obesity. 2013; 37(10): 1295–1306. [PubMed: 23736360]
61. Grote V, Theurich M. Complementary feeding and obesity risk. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care. 2014; 17(3):273–277. [PubMed: 24613861]
62. Bailey LC, Forrest CB, Zhang P, Richards TM, Livshits A, DeRusso PA. Association of antibiotics in infancy with early childhood obesity. JAMA pediatrics. 2014; 168(11):1063–1069. [PubMed: 25265089]
63. Anzman-Frasca S, Stifter CA, Birch LL. Temperament and childhood obesity risk: a review of the literature. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2012; 33(9):732–745. [PubMed: 23095495]
64. Bergmeier H, Skouteris H, Horwood S, Hooley M, Richardson B. Associations between child temperament, maternal feeding practices and child body mass index during the preschool years: a systematic review of the literature. Obesity Reviews. 2014; 15(1):9–18. [PubMed: 23957249]
65. Bonuck KA, Huang V, Fletcher J. Inappropriate bottle use: an early risk for overweight? Literature review and pilot data for a bottle weaning trial. Maternal & child nutrition. 2010; 6(1):38–52. [PubMed: 20055929]
66. Bonuck K, Avraham SB, Lo Y, Kahn R, Hyden C. Bottle-weaning intervention and toddler overweight. The Journal of pediatrics. 2014; 164(2):306–312. e302. [PubMed: 24183206]
67. Wahi G, Parkin PC, Beyene J, Uleryk EM, Birken CS. Effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing screen time in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2011; 165(11):979–986. [PubMed: 21727260]
68. Hughes AR, Sherriff A, Ness AR, Reilly JJ. Timing of adiposity rebound and adiposity in adolescence. Pediatrics. 2014; 134(5):e1354–e1361. [PubMed: 25311600]
69. Moreno JP, Johnston CA, Chen TA, et al. Seasonal variability in weight change during elementary school. Obesity. 2014
70. Baranowski T, O'Connor T, Johnston C, et al. School year versus summer differences in child weight gain: a narrative review. Childhood Obesity. 2014; 10(1):18–24. [PubMed: 24367922]
71. Lamboglia CMGF, Silva VTBLd, Vasconcelos Filho JEd, et al. Exergaming as a strategic tool in the fight against childhood obesity: a systematic review. Journal of obesity. 2013; 2013
72. Chen J-L, Wilkosz ME. Efficacy of technology-based interventions for obesity prevention in adolescents: a systematic review. Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics. 2014; 5:159.
73. Badaly D. Peer similarity and influence for weight-related outcomes in adolescence: A meta- analytic review. Clinical psychology review. 2013; 33(8):1218–1236. [PubMed: 24252520]
Brown et al. Page 14
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
74. Salvy S-J, De La Haye K, Bowker JC, Hermans RC. Influence of peers and friends on children's and adolescents' eating and activity behaviors. Physiology & behavior. 2012; 106(3):369–378. [PubMed: 22480733]
75. Inge TH, King WC, Jenkins TM, et al. The Effect of Obesity in Adolescence on Adult Health Status. Pediatrics. 2013; 132(6):1098–1104. [PubMed: 24249816]
76. Brotman LM, Dawson-McClure S, Huang K-Y, et al. Early childhood family intervention and long-term obesity prevention among high-risk minority youth. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(3):e621– e628. [PubMed: 22311988]
77. Barlow SE, Expert C. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(Suppl 4):S164–192. [PubMed: 18055651]
78. Whitlock EP, Williams SB, Gold R, Smith PR, Shipman SA. Screening and interventions for childhood overweight: a summary of evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2005; 116(1):e125–e144. [PubMed: 15995013]
79. Whitlock EP, O'Connor EA, Williams SB, Beil TL, Lutz KW. Effectiveness of weight management interventions in children: a targeted systematic review for the USPSTF. Pediatrics. 2010; 125(2):e396–418. [PubMed: 20083531]
80. Resnicow K, Davis R, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing for pediatric obesity: Conceptual issues and evidence review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2006; 106(12):2024– 2033. [PubMed: 17126634]
81. Schwartz RP, Hamre R, Dietz WH, et al. Office-based motivational interviewing to prevent childhood obesity: a feasibility study. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2007; 161(5): 495–501. [PubMed: 17485627]
82. Schwartz RP. Motivational interviewing (patient-centered counseling) to address childhood obesity. Pediatric annals. 2010; 39(3):154–158. [PubMed: 20302247]
83. Whitlock, EP.; O'Conner, EA.; Williams, SB.; Beil, TL.; Lutz, KW. Effectiveness of Primary Care Interventions for Weight Management in Children and Adolescents. 2010.
84. Birch LL, Fisher JO, Davison KK. Learning to overeat: maternal use of restrictive feeding practices promotes girls' eating in the absence of hunger. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003; 78(2):215–220. [PubMed: 12885700]
85. Krebs NF, Jacobson MS. Prevention of pediatric overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2003; 112(2): 424–430. [PubMed: 12897303]
86. Owen CG, Martin RM, Whincup PH, Smith GD, Cook DG. Effect of infant feeding on the risk of obesity across the life course: a quantitative review of published evidence. Pediatrics. 2005; 115(5):1367–1377. [PubMed: 15867049]
87. Robinson TN, Kiernan M, Matheson DM, Haydel KF. Is Parental Control over Children's Eating Associated with Childhood Obesity? Results from a Population-Based Sample of Third Graders. Obesity research. 2001; 9(5):306–312. [PubMed: 11346672]
88. Satter E. The feeding relationship: problems and interventions. The Journal of pediatrics. 1990; 117(2):S181–S189. [PubMed: 2199651]
89. Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. The Journal of pediatrics. 2005; 146(6):732–737. [PubMed: 15973308]
90. Tan CC, Holub SC. Maternal feeding practices associated with food neophobia. Appetite. 2012; 59(2):483–487. [PubMed: 22735332]
91. Ekstein S, Laniado D, Glick B. Does picky eating affect weight-for-length measurements in young children? Clinical pediatrics. 2010; 49(3):217–220. [PubMed: 19483138]
92. Hagan, JF.; Shaw, JS.; Duncan, PM. Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. American Academy of Pediatrics Elk Grove Village; IL: 2008.
93. Eneli IU, Crum PA, Tylka TL. The trust model: a different feeding paradigm for managing childhood obesity. Obesity. 2008; 16(10):2197–2204. [PubMed: 18854816]
94. Krebs NF, Himes JH, Jacobson D, Nicklas TA, Guilday P, Styne D. Assessment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(Supplement 4):S193–S228. [PubMed: 18055652]
Brown et al. Page 15
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
95. Agras WS, Hammer LD, McNicholas F, Kraemer HC. Risk factors for childhood overweight: a prospective study from birth to 9.5 years. J Pediatr. 2004; 145(1):20–25. [PubMed: 15238901]
96. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. Jama. 2002; 288(15):1909–1914. [PubMed: 12377092]
97. Institute of Medicine. Committee of accelerating progress in obesity prevention and Glickman D. Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: solving the weight of the nation. National Academies Press Washington; DC: 2012.
98. Brennan LK, Brownson RC, Orleans CT. Childhood obesity policy research and practice: evidence for policy and environmental strategies. American journal of preventive medicine. 2014; 46(1):e1– e16. [PubMed: 24355679]
99. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1986; 1986
100. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. 2008; 49(3):182.
101. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American journal of health promotion. 1997; 12(1):38–48. [PubMed: 10170434]
102. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American journal of public health. 1999; 89(9):1322– 1327. [PubMed: 10474547]
103. Leeman J, Sommers J, Leung MM, Ammerman A. Disseminating evidence from research and practice: a model for selecting evidence to guide obesity prevention. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2011; 17(2):133–140. [PubMed: 21297408]
104. Katz DL, O'Connell M, Yeh M-C, et al. Public health strategies for preventing and controlling overweight and obesity in school and worksite settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005; 54(2)
105. World Health Organization. Population-based approaches to childhood obesity prevention. 2012.
106. Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity: the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Jama. 1996; 275(10):768–776. [PubMed: 8598593]
107. Lazorick S, Crawford Y, Gilbird A, et al. Long-term obesity prevention and the Motivating Adolescents with Technology to CHOOSE Health™ program. Childhood Obesity. 2014; 10(1): 25–33. [PubMed: 24325403]
108. Moore JB, Schneider L, Lazorick S, et al. Rationale and Development of the Move More North Carolina: Recommended Standards for After School Physical Activity. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2010; 16(4):359–366. [PubMed: 20520375]
109. McGuire S. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans. US Government Printing Office; Washington, DC: Jan. 2010 2011. Advances in Nutrition: An International Review Journal. 2011;2(3):293–294
110. S.3307, 111th Congress of the United States (2009–10). Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010.
111. Schor EL. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the F. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(6 Pt 2):1541–1571. [PubMed: 12777595]
112. Barsh GS, Farooqi IS, O'Rahilly S. Genetics of body-weight regulation. Nature. 2000; 404(6778): 644–651. [PubMed: 10766251]
113. Skelton JA, Buehler C, Irby MB, Grzywacz JG. Where are family theories in family-based obesity treatment?: conceptualizing the study of families in pediatric weight management. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012
114. Dev DA, McBride BA, Fiese BH, Jones BL, Cho H. Behalf Of The Strong Kids Research T. Risk factors for overweight/obesity in preschool children: an ecological approach. Child Obes. 2013; 9(5):399–408. [PubMed: 24020790]
115. Baumrind D. Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph. 1971; 4:101–103.
116. Baumrind, D. Rearing competent children. In: Damon, W., editor. Child Development Today and Tomorrow. Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, CA: 1989. p. 349-378.
Brown et al. Page 16
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
117. Maccoby, E.; Martin, J. Socialization in the context of the family: parent-child interaction. In: Hetherington, E., editor. Handbook of Child Psychology: Socialization, Personality and Social Development. Wiley; New York, NY: 1983. p. 1-101.
118. Rhee K. Childhood overweight and the relationship between parent behaviors, parenting style, and family functioning. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2008; 615:11–37.
119. Rhee KE, Lumeng JC, Appugliese DP, Kaciroti N, Bradley RH. Parenting styles and overweight status in first grade. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(6):2047–2054. [PubMed: 16740847]
120. Brotman LM, Dawson-McClure S, Huang KY, et al. Early childhood family intervention and long-term obesity prevention among high-risk minority youth. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(3):e621– 628. [PubMed: 22311988]
121. Hammons AJ, Fiese BH. Is frequency of shared family meals related to the nutritional health of children and adolescents? Pediatrics. 2011; 127(6):e1565–1574. [PubMed: 21536618]
122. Skeer MR, Ballard EL. Are family meals as good for youth as we think they are? A review of the literature on family meals as they pertain to adolescent risk prevention. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2013; 42(7):943–963. [PubMed: 23712661]
123. Rhee K. Childhood overweight and the relationship between parent behaviors, parenting style, and family functioning. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2008; 615(1):11–37.
124. Rhee KE, Lumeng JC, Appugliese DP, Kaciroti N, Bradley RH. Parenting styles and overweight status in first grade. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(6):2047–2054. [PubMed: 16740847]
Brown et al. Page 17
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
SYNOPSIS
The overweight and obesity epidemic among children and adolescents in the United
States continues to worsen, with notable racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities.
Risk factors for pediatric obesity include genetics; environmental and neighborhood
factors; increased intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, fast-food, and processed snacks;
decreased physical activity; shorter sleep duration; and increased personal, prenatal, or
family stress. Pediatricians can help prevent obesity by measuring body mass index at
least yearly and providing age and development-appropriate anticipatory guidance to
families. Public policies and environmental interventions aim to make it easier for
children to make healthy nutrition and physical activity choices. Interventions focused on
family habits and parenting strategies have also been successful at preventing or treating
childhood obesity.
Brown et al. Page 18
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
KEY POINTS
• Childhood obesity is a complex medical issue, representing the interplay of physical and environmental factors.
• The neuroendocrine control of weight includes multiple situations where genetic variation can influence a person's weight status.
• The unhealthy evolution of food and activity environments has placed children at a higher risk for obesity and associated weight problems than they ever have
been before.
Brown et al. Page 19
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Box 1. Review of Risk Factors for Pediatric Obesity
• Genetic Syndromes, monogenic disorders, or hormonal disorders
• Living in neighborhoods that are lower-income, predominantly non-mixed-race, perceived as dangerous, or are an increased distance from parks and foods stores
• Increased intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, fast food, and processed snacks
• Decreased physical activity
• Shorter sleep duration
• Increased personal, prenatal, or family stress
Brown et al. Page 20
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Box 2. Review of Developmental Approach to Obesity Prevention
• Prenatal – appropriate gestational weight gain, no tobacco exposure
• Infancy – minimize rapid weight gain, later introduction of solid foods, avoid broad-spectrum antibiotics as possible
• Toddlers – encourage self-regulation of feeding and lots of physical activity
• School-aged children – exergaming, use of technology-based interventions to improve nutrition and physical activity
• Adolescents – include peer groups in interventions
Brown et al. Page 21
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Box 3. Review of the Primary Care Provider's Role in Preventing Obesity
• Measure height and weight and calculate BMI at least annually, observing for trends such as a rapid increase in BMI
• Offer anticipatory guidance about nutrition and physical activity at every well child check
• Use motivational interviewing to help families to make healthier choices
• Advocate for children on a local and national level
Brown et al. Page 22
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Box 4. Review of Policy and Environmental Interventions to Prevent Obesity
• Improve attitudes and norms to support healthy energy balance
• Make healthy options for physical activity and nutrition easy and the default choices
• Reduce barriers to making healthy nutrition and physical activity choices
• Substantial progress has been made- policy changes are underway and are being evaluated
Brown et al. Page 23
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Box 5. Review of the Family's Role in Preventing Pediatric Obesity
• Include the entire family in obesity prevention and treatment
• Act as positive role models to children regarding healthy nutrition, physical activity, and emotional and social health
• Practice authoritative, not authoritarian, parenting styles
• Have a non-restrictive approach to early childhood feeding
• Provide structure
• Have regular family meals
Brown et al. Page 24
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Figure 1. Ecological Model of Childhood Obesity
Brown et al. Page 25
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Figure 2. Motivational Interviewing to Help Families Make Positive Changes to Prevent Obesity
Brown et al. Page 26
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Brown et al. Page 27
T a b
le 1
A nt
ic ip
at or
y gu
id an
ce a
nd s
pe ci
fi c
in te
rv en
ti on
s by
a ge
a nd
d ev
el op
m en
ta l
st ag
e
N u
tr it
io n
P h
ys ic
al A
ct iv
it y/
O th
er S
p ec
if ic
I n
te rv
en ti
on s
P re
na ta
l P
er io
d -
A vo
id o
ve r-
a nd
u nd
er -n
ut ri
ti on
d ur
in g
pr eg
na nc
y -
A vo
id t
ob ac
co -
W ei
gh t
ga in
p er
I O
M g
ui de
li ne
s: U
nd er
w ei
gh t:
2 8-
40 lb
s N
or m
al -w
ei gh
t: 2
5- 35
lb s
O ve
rw ei
gh t:
1 5-
25 lb
s O
be se
: 11
-2 0l
bs
- A
vo id
c af
fe in
e
N ew
bo rn
-6 m
on th
s -
E xc
lu si
ve b
re as
tf ee
di ng
u nt
il 6
m on
th s
- T
um m
y ti
m e
- A
vo id
b ro
ad -s
pe ct
ru m
a nt
ib io
ti cs
i f
po ss
ib le
- O
nl y
br ea
st m
il k
or f
or m
ul a,
n o
su ga
r sw
ee te
ne d
be ve
ra ge
s (S
S B
) -
N o
sc re
en t
im e
or t
el ev
is io
n
- B
e m
in df
ul o
f ch
il d'
s fe
ed in
g cu
es
- A
ll ow
c hi
ld t
o fe
ed a
t th
ei r
ow n
pa ce
- S
to p
fe ed
in g
w he
n ch
il d
is d
on e
- D
on 't
pu t
to s
le ep
w hi
le f
ee di
ng
- N
o te
le vi
si on
, e sp
ec ia
ll y
w hi
le f
ee di
ng
6– 12
m on
th s
- C
on ti
nu ed
b re
as tf
ee di
ng u
nt il
1 2
m on
th s
an d
be yo
nd -
N o
sc re
en t
im e
or t
el ev
is io
n -
A vo
id b
ro ad
-s pe
ct ru
m a
nt ib
io ti
cs i
f po
ss ib
le
- In
tr od
uc e
so li
ds w
he n
de ve
lo pm
en ta
ll y
re ad
y (s
it , o
pe n
m ou
th o
n cu
e, c
lo se
m ou
th
ar ou
nd s
po on
)
- E
nc ou
ra ge
f ru
it s
an d
ve ge
ta bl
es
- F
in ge
r fo
od s
w it
h so
ft t
ab le
f oo
ds
- W
id e
va ri
et y
of t
ex tu
re s
an d
fl av
or s
- C
on ti
nu e
to o
ff er
f oo
ds t
ha t
a ch
il d
ha s
pr ev
io us
ly n
ot l
ik ed
- S
tr uc
tu re
d m
ea l
an d
sn ac
k ti
m es
12 –2
4 m
on th
s -
L im
it ed
s ug
ar -s
w ee
te ne
d be
ve ra
ge s
- <
1 ho
ur o
f sc
re en
t im
e pe
r da
y -
C on
si de
r ea
rl y
bo tt
le w
ea ni
ng
- E
at t
og et
he r
as a
f am
il y
at s
tr uc
tu re
d m
ea l
an d
sn ac
k ti
m es
- A
vo id
b ro
ad -s
pe ct
ru m
a nt
ib io
ti cs
i f
po ss
ib le
- S
it a
t ta
bl e
fo r
al l
sn ac
ks , d
ri nk
s, a
nd m
ea ls
- P
re pa
re f
oo ds
i n
a va
ri et
y of
w ay
s
- L
im it
e at
in g
at r
es ta
ur an
ts , e
sp ec
ia ll
y fa
st f
oo d
- A
vo id
r es
tr ic
ti ve
o r
em ot
io na
l fe
ed in
g
- L
et c
hi ld
c ho
os e
ho w
m uc
h of
o ff
er ed
f oo
d to
e at
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Brown et al. Page 28
N u
tr it
io n
P h
ys ic
al A
ct iv
it y/
O th
er S
p ec
if ic
I n
te rv
en ti
on s
- E
nc ou
ra ge
p os
it iv
e pa
re nt
m od
el in
g ha
bi ts
- P
ro vi
de p
er sp
ec ti
ve o
n po
rt io
n si
ze
24 –4
8 m
on th
s -
R ea
li st
ic e
xp ec
ta ti
on s
fo r
ta bl
e m
an ne
rs -
< 2
ho ur
s of
s cr
ee n
ti m
e pe
r da
y -
A vo
id r
es tr
ic ti
ve o
r em
ot io
na l
fe ed
in g
ha bi
ts
- 3
m ea
ls a
d ay
a t
se t
ti m
es
- N
o gr
az in
g be
tw ee
n m
ea ls
e xc
ep t
fo r
sc he
du le
d sn
ac ks
4– 12
y ea
rs -
S et
s om
e ba
si c
ru le
s, t
he n
al lo
w c
hi ld
t o
ch oo
se a
ft er
-s ch
oo l
sn ac
k -
A t
le as
t 60
m in
o f
m od
er at
e to
vi
go ro
us p
hy si
ca l
ac ti
vi ty
d ai
ly -
C on
si de
r te
ch no
lo gi
ca l
in te
rv en
ti on
s
13 –1
8 ye
ar s
- A
ll ow
c hi
ld t
o ta
ke r
es po
ns ib
il it
y fo
r ch
oo si
ng a
nd e
at in
g m
ea ls
a w
ay f
ro m
h om
e -
60 m
in p
hy si
ca l
ac ti
vi ty
d ai
ly -
C on
si de
r te
ch no
lo gi
ca l
in te
rv en
ti on
s
- E
xp ec
t ch
il d
to b
e hu
ng ry
a t
di nn
er
- T
ea ch
h ow
t o
pl an
a nd
p re
pa re
m ea
ls a
nd s
na ck
s -
In vo
lv e
pe er
g ro
up s
in i
nt er
ve nt
io ns
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Brown et al. Page 29
Table 2
Policy examples: Ranging in Scope
Scope Examples of policies or environmental strategies
Site-specific • Banks, stores, professionals give incentives for children that do not contribute to unhealthful habits or energy imbalance
(example: stickers instead of candy; balloons instead of cookies) c
• Corner stores and quick marts offer low fat/sugar snacks, fruits and vegetables b
• Entertainment venues offer healthful options, water; allow outside (home-packed) foods c
• Point of decision prompts- (elevator vs. stairs initiatives; menu, cafeteria or buffet signage and prompts a
Local • Establish shared use agreements for physical activity space and equipment
b
• Promote ways to allow active transport to and from school (bike lanes and racks, crossing guards, group walks to school) b
• Emphasize maintaining or re-establishing time for recess, physical activity, physical education b
• Support school and community gardens, partnerships with local farmers c
• Access to safe, free drinking water in recreation environments b
State • Subsidies for schools/childcare sites for provision of healthy foods
a
• Incentives for grocers in rural or urban areas c
• Mechanism for small vendors (farmers markets) to take SNAP (“food stamps”) cards c
• Medicaid coverage for dietician services and preventive counseling c
• Support for increasing sites and access for recreation a
National • Healthy and Hunger Free Kids Act (HHFKA), including standards for meals in school (e.g the National School Lunch
Program) a
• Changes to Women, Infant and Children (WIC) food package and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
policies a
• Changes to SNAP-Ed guidance for educational programs a
• Menu labeling for restaurants b
• Laws addressing advertising to children c
• Food and beverage industry incentives c
International • Published guidelines for member states for population level strategies for obesity prevention across settings105
a Evidence or existing systematic review to support98.
b Emerging strategy but more data needed98.
c Sample policy change needing pilot data and further study
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Brown et al. Page 30
T a b
le 3
E xa
m pl
es o
f P
ol ic
ie s
an d
P ro
gr am
s in
S et
ti ng
s w
he re
C hi
ld re
n S
pe nd
S ub
st an
ti al
T im
e
S et
ti n
g E
xa m
p le
p ro
gr am
D es
cr ip
ti on
G en
er al
e ff
or ts
m ay
t ar
ge t
• E
du ca
ti on
a bo
ut e
ne rg
y ba
la nc
e an
d ne
ga ti
ve h
ea lt
h ef
fe ct
s of
o be
si ty
• P
ro m
ot io
n of
m or
e op
po rt
un it
ie s
fo r
an d
en jo
ym en
t of
p hy
si ca
l ac
ti vi
ty
• O
ff er
in g
ag e-
ap pr
op ri
at e
po rt
io n
si ze
s fo
ll ow
in g
U S
D A
g ui
de li
ne s
• A
ss ur
in g
pr og
ra m
s ta
ff a
re k
no w
le dg
ea bl
e an
d ap
pr op
ri at
el y
tr ai
ne d
• E
st ab
li sh
in g
an d
im pl
em en
ti ng
l oc
al w
el ln
es s
po li
ce s
• Im
pr ov
in g
qu al
it y
an d
ti m
e in
P hy
si ca
l E
du ca
ti on
( P
E );
w or
ki ng
t o
de si
gn at
e P
E a
s a
co re
s ub
je ct
C hi
ld ca
re •
N ut
ri ti
on A
nd P
hy si
ca l
A ct
iv it
y S
el f-
A ss
es sm
en t
fo r
C hi
ld C
ar e
(N A
P S
A C
C ;
w w
w .g
oN A
P S
A C
C .o
rg )a
• S
el f-
as se
ss m
en t,
a ct
io n
pl an
ni ng
, a nd
e du
ca ti
on al
t oo
ls t
o he
lp e
ar ly
c ar
e an
d ed
uc at
io n
pr og
ra m
s se
t go
al s
an d
m ak
e im
pr ov
em en
ts t
o th
ei r
nu tr
it io
n an
d ph
ys ic
al
ac ti
vi ty
p ra
ct ic
es .
E le
m en
ta ry
s ch
oo l
• C
oo rd
in at
ed A
pp ro
ac h
T o
C hi
ld H
ea lt
h (C
A T
C H
, w w
w .C
A T
C H
in fo
.o rR
)) ,
ba se
d on
e vi
de nc
e fr
om t
he C
hi ld
a nd
A do
le sc
en t
T ri
al f
or C
ar di
ov as
cu la
r
H ea
lt ha
• M
ul ti
fa ce
te d
in te
rv en
ti on
i n
el em
en ta
ry s
ch oo
ls g
ra de
s K
-5 :
im pl
em en
te d
in t
he
cl as
sr oo
m , c
af et
er ia
, P E
a nd
f am
il ie
s to
f os
te r
he al
th y
be ha
vi or
s in
d ie
t an
d P
A 10
6
• S
P A
R K
p ro
gr am
t o
im pr
ov e
ph ys
ic al
e du
ca ti
on (
w w
w .S
P A
R K
P E
.o rg
)a •
T oo
lk it
a nd
t ra
in in
g fo
r sc
ho ol
s to
i m
pr ov
e an
d in
cr ea
se P
A t
im e
in P
E
M id
dl e
S ch
oo l
• M
ot iv
at in
g A
do le
sc en
ts w
it h
T ec
hn ol
og y
to C
H O
O S
E H
ea lt
h™ (
M A
T C
H ;
w w
w .M
A T
C H
w el
ln es
s. or
g) b
• C
om bi
ne d
m ul
ti di
sc ip
li na
ry e
du ca
ti on
al -b
eh av
io ra
l w
el ln
es s
in te
rv en
ti on
e m
be dd
ed
in c
ur ri
cu lu
m i
n 7t
h gr
ad er
s ta
ug ht
b y
cl as
sr oo
m t
ea ch
er s
ov er
4 –5
m on
th s
to b
ui ld
sk
il ls
i n
he al
th y
ch oi
ce s1
07
A ft
er s
ch oo
l •
S P
A R
K a
ft er
sc ho
ol b (
w w
w .S
P A
R K
P E
.o rg
) •
A s
ab ov
e fo
r S
P A
R K
, t ar
ge ti
ng a
ft er
sc ho
ol s
et ti
ng s
• M
ov e
M or
e N
C :
R ec
om m
en de
d S
ta nd
ar ds
f or
A ft
er sc
ho ol
P hy
si ca
l A
ct iv
it yb
• R
ec om
m en
de d
st an
da rd
s fo
r af
te rs
ch oo
l pr
og ra
m s
to i
nc re
as e
an d
en ha
nc e
qu al
it y
of
P A
t im
e1 08
a E
vi de
nc e
or e
xi st
in g
sy st
em at
ic r
ev ie
w t
o su
pp or
t th
e st
ra te
gi es
i nc
lu de
d in
t hi
s pr
og ra
m .
b A
dd re
ss es
c om
po ne
nt s
w it
h su
pp or
ti ng
e vi
de nc
e bu
t fu
rt he
r st
ud ie
s ne
ed ed
.
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
A u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t A
u th
o r M
a n u scrip
t
Brown et al. Page 31
Table 4
Parenting Styles
High expectations for self-control Low expectations for self-control
High Sensitivity Authoritative: respects child's opinions but with clear boundaries
Permissive: minimal discipline, indulgent of child
Low Sensitivity Authoritarian: strict, significant discipline Neglectful: no boundaries or discipline, minimally involved with child
Data from refs117,123,124
Pediatr Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 October 01.
