Milestone 2 011822

CHE 329 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: For this milestone, due in Module Three, you will build on the introductory information you detailed in Milestone One to draft a policy analysis. Instructor feedback on this milestone should be incorporated into your next milestone and into the final project.

Prompt: Using the policy issue you identified in Milestone One and the skills you have developed since Module One, analyze your selected policy issue by addressing the following:

 Demographics: Identify and discuss the demographics of the aging population impacted by your chosen aging-policy issue. ● Benefits: Describe the benefits of the existing policy to your demographic/population. Consider the policy’s strengths, opportunities, and/or benefits.  Limitations: Describe the limitations of the existing policy to your demographic/population. Consider the policy’s weaknesses, challenges, and/or

threats.  Impact: Briefly describe the impact of the policy on the specified demographic/population, considering the previously identified benefits and limitations. ● Stakeholders: Identify a minimum of two stakeholders of your chosen aging-policy issue, explaining why these individuals are stakeholders.  Perspectives: Discuss whether or not the stakeholders you identified have competing or similar perspectives. For example, do these stakeholders have

similar or different things to gain or lose related to your chosen policy issue?

Instructor feedback on this milestone should be incorporated into your next milestone and into the final project.

Guidelines for Submission: Milestone Two should be 2 to 3 pages, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and the latest edition of the APA manual for formatting and citations.

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Demographics Identifies and discusses the demographics of the aging population impacted by the chosen aging-policy issue

Identifies and discusses the demographics of the aging population impacted by the chosen aging-policy issue, but description is cursory or lacking in detail

Does not identify or discuss the demographics of the aging population impacted by the chosen aging-policy issue

15

Benefits Describes the benefits of the existing policy to a particular demographic/population and considers the policy’s strengths, opportunities, and/or benefits

Describes the benefits of the existing policy to a particular demographic/population, but description does not sufficiently consider the policy’s strengths, opportunities, and/or benefits

Does not describe the benefits of the existing policy to a particular demographic/population

15

Limitations Describes the limitations of the existing policy to a particular demographic/population and considers the policy’s weaknesses, challenges, and/or threats

Describes the limitations of the existing policy to a particular demographic/population, but description does not sufficiently consider the policy’s weaknesses, challenges, and/or threats

Does not describe the limitations of the existing policy to a particular demographic/population

15

Impact Describes the impact of the policy on the specified demographic/population and considers the previously identified benefits and limitations

Describes the impact of the policy on the specified demographic/population, but does not sufficiently consider the previously identified benefits and limitations

Does not describe the impact of the policy on the specified demographic/population

15

Stakeholders Identifies a minimum of two stakeholders of the aging-policy issue, explaining why the individuals are stakeholders

Identifies a minimum of two stakeholders of the aging policy issue, explaining why the individuals are stakeholders, but explanation has gaps in detail or logic, or identifications are inaccurate

Does not identify a minimum of two stakeholders of the aging-policy issue

15

Perspectives Discusses whether or not the stakeholders identified have competing or similar perspectives

Discusses whether or not the stakeholders identified have competing or similar perspectives, but discussion is cursory or lacking in detail

Does not discuss whether or not the stakeholders identified have competing or similar perspectives

15

Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10

Total 100%