religion
205
9 The Church: The Reign of God As Christian Community 1 Corinthians 12:27
Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it.
Matthew 16:18
And on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will
not overcome it.
Ephesians 5:25
Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her
Genesis 12:1-4 Hosea 11:1-9
1 Corinthians 12, 14
Deuteronomy 7:6-11; Joel 2:28
Galatians 3:28-29
Ephesians 1-3
Ephesians 4:11-16
Revelation 12:17; 19:10 9:4-5
Matthew 16:13-19
Deuteronomy 26:1-11
Isaiah 5:1-7
Matthew 21:33-43
Acts 1-15
Isaiah 49 1 Corinthians 1:26-31
206
make it different from every other The reign of God is what scholars
call an eschatological idea. This
means that it refers to last things, to
the end of time." It contains the
human group or society. Under
standing this community, its nature and purpose, is essential to an under standing of salvation.
conviction that history reaches its
climax when God's purposes are
fulfilled in human affairs. In one
SALVATION AND THE CHURCIH sense, the end of history arrived with
Jesus. His work established the reign of God in the sphere of human
existence. His teaching and his
ministry vividly displayed the nature
of God's sovereignty, and he urged
people to enter God's kingdom by accepting him as Lord of their lives.
In another sense, the reign of God still 1lies in the future. It is
The doctrine of Christ is only one part of the doctrine of salvation. It
describes God's activity in making salvation available to fallen
humanity. The other part of the doctrine describes the reception, or
the experience, of salvation. For
human beings to be saved, obviously, they must respond to God's gracious
gift in Jesus Christ. There are many ways to
obvious from the circumstances we
live in that a great deal of what God wants for human beings is not now a
reality. The forces that oppose God
still exercise considerable influence
approach the experience of salvation.
One is to concentrate on the effects
in human affairs. of salvation in individual lives. We
generally think of biblical
expressions like "new birth," So, Christians live in a time
tension-between the "already" of
present salvation and the "not yet" of "justification," and "sanctification" as
future fulfillment. Theologians some times express this by distinguishing between the present kingdom of
grace and the future kingdom of
glory. This chapter and the two that follow it deal with the reign of God
descriptions of what happens to the
individual Christian. We are accustomed to hearing about the
necessity of making a personal
response to the Gospel. Having Christian parents or grandparents
Won't do, we are told; we have to
make a definite decision for Christ as a present reality. They consider the various ways in which the work of Christ transforms human life here and now. One of its most significant results involves human relationships.
The work of Christ brings about a new form of human community, a
community based on principles that
ourselves in order to be saved.
Spiritual individualism
Nothing should detract from the
importance of personal religious experience, but a preoccupation wl
THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
207
essentially an individual matter, then the church-God's people--will
always be less important. We may urge people to attend church to receive a personal blessing or to fulfill their personal obligations, but
we will never appreciate the full
significance of the corporate life in
Christ that the New Testament
For one, it can encourage too much
elfanalysis, or introspection. It can
lead us to become overly concerned
with our attitudes or feelings at the
moment, which often results in
insecurity. People who worry unduly
about their physical health often feel
less well than they are. The same is
sometimes true of people too
concerned about their spiritual health. Another result of overempha-
sizing personal religious experience
is the tendency to lose interest in
others. The driving force of Jesus
life was ministry, or service. He did
not neglect his own relation to God,
certainly, but the good of others was
uppermost in his mind. Those whose
first priority is their own welfare may
attempt to serve others, but their
objective is often to gain personal benefit or discharge some personal
responsibility. It isn't really to en-
hance the well-being of other people.
The most serious theological consequence of spiritual individualism is the failure to
it can have
unfortuna consequences.
describes. What do you say to people who
feel closer to God by themselves than with others? Or to the family that
goes camping every weekend instead
of to worship services? Are they
really missing anything? Perhaps they are not, if salvation is essentially for
individuals. But if it isn't, if it involves unique relationships with
other people as well as with God, then they are missing a great deal.
What they need is a better
understanding of salvation and all
that it means. An adequate doctrine of
salvation, therefore, requires doctrine of the church. Accordingly, to do justice to the work of Christ in all its dimensions and to correct somne
appreciate the larger dimensions of
salvation. Such an attitude obscures prevalent misconceptions, we will
treat the experience of salvation as
part of the doctrine of the church. the fact that God's work in the world
is larger than personal salvation. His purpose is to establish his reign over all creation. This certainly includes
personal salvation, but it is not
exhausted by it. Spiritual individualism makes the
SOCial, or corporate, aspects of salvation seem secondary, even artificial. If we think of salvation as
FACETS OF THE DOCTRINE OF
THE CHURCH
In many ways the doctrine of the
church is the most complex aspect of
Christian faith, perhaps because the
REIGN OF GOD
208
the essential purpose of worshing church is the most vivid spiritual
reality we encounter, and the concrete
is often more difficult to describe
What forms should it take? What is the meaning of activities like baptism than the abstract. In discussing the
church, we must consider a number
of themes. One is its spiritual
identity. We need to explore the
relation of the church to Christ, and
and the Lord's Supper?
Finally, we cannot ignore the question of the true church. The church has taken many turns during its long history, and there are many groups today that call themselves Christian." Are they all entitled to that name? Are any of them entitled to it? Seventh-day Adventists often describe themselves as the "remnant church." What does this mean, and what does it say about the relation of Adventism to other Christian groups,
to examine his role as head of the
church and as high priest of his
people. In addition, we need to look
at the gifts of the Spirit to the church.
Another important topic is the
membership of the church. What is
the essential identity of church
members? What distinguishes Christians as a group from other
human beings? What are the
implications for their behavior? What
does "life in the Spirit" consist of? We also need to reflect on the
past and present?
THE GOsPEL AND THE CHURCH
role of the church in the world. The The church is part of the gospel. The heart of the good news is that God
acted in Jesus for human salvation, and he offers it to everyone as a gitt,
church's mission takes it into the
world, bringing it into contact with
other religions and with different
social and political structures. Just
what is the church's mission? What
sort of organization does it call for? How can Christians fulfill their
free of charge. But the good news
doesn't stop there. Christ not only
died for our sins and rose to life from
spiritual, social, and political responsibilities at the same time? These questions call for a wholistic view of the church, not unlike the wholistic doctrine of humanity proposed earlier. The church is both a spiritual reality and a visible, social- historical institution. We can't reduce
the dead; he also created a community to whom and through
whom his presence in the world
continues. In the church he fulfills his
promise, "Lo, I am with you always,
to the close of the age" (Matt 28:20).
The church is the sphere of
salvation. God is active in the churcn
to accomplish reconciliation,
and ne
adds to the church those who are it to one or the other.
The subject of Christian worship also deserves consideration. What is being saved (Acts 2:47). The churcn
THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
209
is also the means ofs salvation. Its
offer of God's power in the church The church, then, is a kind of
community which human beings cannot produce. What happens among members of the church, the
spirit of fellowship which they enjoy, is something only the unique
presence of God can explain. In the
wake of Pentecost, for example, early Christians held their possessions in
common (Acts 2:44-45). What united
them was so compelling that the
normally important distinctions
between "mine" and "yours" seemed
insignificant.
mission
is to extend the
19-20), and the plan of salvation
will not be complete until this is
salvation
to the entire world (Matt
accomplished (Matt 24:14). Thus it is
evident that the church plays an
essential
role in God's work of
salvation.
Christ in the church
The book of Acts shows how the
work of Christ continues in thee
church. Originally part of a longer
work, Luke-Acts, it JOins the Gospels
to provide a comprehensive account
of Christian beginnings. The
description of Pentecost is crucial to
the purpose of the book (Acts 2).
This miraculous display of the Holy
Spirit's power accomplished several
important things: It fulfilled the
promise of Jesus (Acts 1:8); it
assured the early Christians not only
of Christ's continuing care for them,
but of his actual presence among
them; and it empowered them to
fulfill the mission he had given them.
Peter's greatest sermon directly
followed this manifestation. In it he
proclaimed Jesus as the Messiah who
was presently alive, sitting at the
ight hand of God. The further words
Because it owes its existence to
the power of God, the church is
unlike any other group. Most
organizations arise because people
have similar interests or needs.
People who enjoy photography may
form a camera club, for example.
Students who need academic help
may form study groups. Groups like
this exist to meet the needs or
stimulate the interest of the individual
members.
Other groups arise from deeper
human needs. Families and nations,
for example, reveal a fundamental
human need for fellowship. In such
groups the interests of the community
are more important than those of the
individual. With a club it is
individuals that make the group
important, but in a community the
individual derives significance
from
the group. In addition, the community
as a whole generaly has a personality
of its own, distinct from those of the
and works of the apostles also testify
to the abiding power of the Spirit in
their midst. The story of Pentecost
underlines the fact that the church is
not a human creation, but owes its
eXIstence to the power of God. REIGN OF GOD
210
variety of ways, the New Testament also employs a host of different symbols, or metaphors, for the
individuals who make it up. Obviously the church is more
like the second kind of group than the
first. It is more important than the
individual members who comprise it, and it has a personality of its own,
derived from Christ, its head. But it
church. For example, members of the church are sometimes called "sain aints" "believers," and "slaves." The church itself is variously referred to as a kingdom," "temple," *"household is much more than the natural fulfillment of a human need. Only God could create the kind of
"vineyard," and "flock." But amon fellowship available in the community of the Spirit, and only the power of God can account for its remarkable history. The Christian church is the primary means by which God reestablishes his reign among human beings.
the many biblical descriptions of the church, two are particularly important. One is the "people of God"; the other is the "body of Christ." The first calls attention to the church's place in history, while the second emphasizes its intimate relation to Christ.
The covenant The expression "people of God" reminds us that God has been
THE CHURCH AS THE PEOPLE OF GOD)
working for human salvation ever since the Fall. He characteristically operates within the framework of a certain relationship with human beings, one the Bible calls a covenant." A covenant is like a
As it appears in the New Testament, the word "church" has several different meanings. It can refer to a group of people called together for a particular purpose; a community of Christian believers in a specific area; or to all of God's people, whenever and wherever they lived. It is never used in the Bible to refer to a
formal agreement, or a contract. It
sets down the terms of a relationship between different parties and lists the
privileges and responsibilities involved on both sides. In the Bible,
God always makes the covenant. In
doing so, he promises certain things
to people, and he indicates what he
expects of them in return.
The word itself first appears in
the story of Noah, where God tells
the patriarch to take his family into
the ark: "I will establish my covenant
building, and it never refers to one branch of Christianity as opposed to another. Early Christian
congregations typically met in private homes, and different denominations did not yet exist.
Symbols for the church Besides using the term itself in a
CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
211
with you; and you shall come into the
ark" (Gen 6:18). Later, God made a
A second feature of Israel's call was its distinct purpose. God was not
playing favorites when he chose Israel; he did not intend to set them apart from other people as the exclusive objects of his love. Instead, he wanted them to be the means of extending salvation to others. In other words, God didn't love Israel instead of other people; he wanted to love all
people through Israel. Israel was called to service, not elevated to a
privileged status. The prophets expressed God's
hopes for Israel in glowing terms. God saw them as "a covenant to the
covenant with Abraham and with his
descendants (Gen 17:7), promising to
bless all the families of the earth
through them (Gen 28:14). He
reaffirmed this covenant with the
people of Israel at Sinai, after he
delivered them from Egypt. Hfe
promised that Israel would be his
special people among the nations of
the earth (Exod 19:5). He promised
to give them the land of Palestine
(Deut 4:37-38), and he stipulated
obedience to his commandments as a
condition of this relationship (Exod 19:5-8; Deut 7:9, 12). people, a light to the nations, to open
the eyes that are blind, to bring out
the prisoners from the dungeon" (Isa 42:6-7). In Israel God wanted to put
the effects of his saving power on
public display so that, through Israel, salvation would reach the entire
The election of Israel
God's call to Israel has two important
features. In the first place, it was not
something Israel deserved. God
didn't select the Jews to be his world. "I will give you as a light to
the nations, that my salvation may
reach to the end of the earth'" (Isa
49:6; cf. 52:10).
special people because they were
larger or stronger than other nations
(Deut 7:7), nor because they were
spiritually superior (Deut 9:6). As a
nation they were most unimpressive:
They had been in bondage for
generations, and they were stubborn
(Deut 9:6). In short, there was
nothing about the Hebrew people that
qualified them for special consideration. Their call had its basis
entirely in God's love and faithfulness. He intended to keep the
promises he had made to their
The election of the church
The New Testament refers to the
Christian church as the "people of
God": "But you are a chosen race, a
royal priesthood, a holy nation, God's
own people" (1 Pet 2:9). The features
of the church's call are identical to
those of Israel's. There was nothing
about the members of the early
church that qualified them for special consideration: "For consider your
call, brethren; not many of you were
ancestors (Deut 7:8). Israel's election,
then, was a matter of divine grace, was totally undeserved.
REIGN OF GOD
212
wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many
were of noble birth" (1 Cor 1:26). They owed their position entirely to
the grace of God. "He is the source of your life in Christ Jesus" (v. 30).
Moreover, the church is not an exclusive group. Its purpose is to
extend salvation to the entire world.
climax of God's saving activity in human history. As a group, of course Jews do not accept these claims for Jesus. By and large, the Jews of his day rejected his mission, and the messianic branches of Judaism todav still await the coming of the Messiah,
The question of Israel today
These divergent attitudes toward Jesus raise the complex question of Jewish-Christian relations. One facet of this question concerns the present role of Israel in the divine plan of salvation. Do the Jews as a people still have a distinctive role to play in
It does this by proclamation and demonstration. The church is to preach the gospel, the good news that
God has acted in Jesus Christ for the salvation of all human beings. It is also intended to display the effects of salvation for all to see, to "declare the wonderful deeds of him who the plan of salvation, or did their
historic mission pass on to the Christian church? There are differences of opinion among Christians over this question, and the testimony of the New Testament itself is not free from ambiguity.
In a famous section of his letter
called you out of darkness into his marvelous light" (1 Pet 2:9).
Differences between the church and Israel There are things about the church, however, that distinguish it from
Israel. One of these is its international composition. The New Testament divorces the church from
to the Romans, Paul insists that God has not rejected his people. Stimu- lated by the responses of Gentiles to
all particular national, ethnic, or social groups. Ideally, it is the most inclusive society on earth. "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal 3:28).
The most important characteristic of the church that distinguishes it from Israel is its attitude toward
the gospel, he believes, the Jews, too,
will accept Jesus (11:14). At the same time, Paul states that "not all who are
descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all the children of Abraham because they are his
descendants" (9:6-7). He also speaks of those who have accepted Christ as
true Israel: "If you are Christ's, then
you are Abraham's offspring, heirs
according to the promise" (Gal 3:29).
In addition, Jesus' famous parable or
Jesus. Christians regard him as the Messiah, or Christ, and look back on his life, death, and resurrection as the the wicked tenants concludes with
HE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
213
vivid manifestation is the these
dramatic words to the Jewish
extermination of six million European Jews in the mid-twentieth century, but that was the culmination of a long and dismal history. For
hundreds of years Christians subjected Jews to many forms of
prejudice and persecution, including economic and social discrimination, exile, and execution.
There is nothing in the Bible that
supports such behavior, and a great deal that condemns it. The familiar
leaders of the time: "Therefore I tell
you, the kingdom of God will be
taken away from you and given to a
nation producing the fruits of it (Matt 21:43).
Coupled with the application to
the church of expressions likke
chosen race," "holy nation," and
God's own people (2 Pet 1:9-10),
such biblical statements convince
many Christians that the church is
now the principal means through which God is working in the world. Jews may join the church, of course;
but as a distinct ethnic or national
group, they no longer have a specific role in salvation history.1
In sharp contrast, other
Christians today believe that Jews
and Christians have clearly separate roles in human history and that both
groups have work yet to do. They maintain that the prophetic promises to Israel will be literally fulfilled before the end of time, and that many Jews will eventually accept Jesus as
the Messiah.2
pretext for this mistreatment, that Jews are collectively responsible for the death of Christ, will simply not stand up. While it is clear that certain Jewish leaders helped to bring about
Jesus' death, the precise role they
played is widely debated today. And the earliest Christian writings never condemn the Jews as a whole. Close inspection reveals that New
Testament texts which speak critically of "Jews" refer to specific individuals, not to an entire people. After all, the first Christians were al1 Jews themselves, and they viewed their commitment to Christ as Other Christians strongly object
to the notion that the church in any way replaces, or "supersedes," Israel. They find the very idea to be anti- Semitic.3 As they see it, Judaism and Christianity are not rival candidates for divine favor, but parallel routes to
salvation.
something that fulfilled their faith as
Jews, not as something that took
them away from it. The sharp
theological differences that emerge in
the New Testament do not point to a conflict between two distinct religions, Judaism and Christianity,
but to intra-Jewish debates over what It is impossible to discuss the
relationship between Jews and Christians without raising the horrible
it means to be Jewish and intra-
Christian debates over what it means
specter of anti-Semitism. Its most to be Christian.
REIGN OF GOD
and he can help us (4:16). Jesus position, therefore, is that of a mediator or intercessor. He is our between with God (1 John 2:1). This description of Jesus' work
The new covenant Because God acted decisively in Jesus, salvation is now a certainty. This gives members of the church
unprecedented assurance of God's love, and confidence in his acceptance of them. The neww situation which this creates is nothing less than a "new covenant," according to the book of Hebrews (8:13; 9:15). It is superior to the old covenant, and the system of worship it involved, in several ways. Its revelation of God is more vivid (1:1 2). As God's Son, Jesus revealed God more effectively than the prophets could. In contrast to animal
should not lead us to feel that God is hostile to us. After all, he is the one who provides the mediator. Instead, it gives us further assurance of God's love for us. He has done everything necessary-everything possible, in fact-to establish fellowship with us. The high priestly ministry of Jesus reminds us that God is on our side.
As high priest, Jesus is not only close to God; he is also extremely close to us. Through the work of the Holy Spirit, in fact, he is personally closer to us than he could be if he
sacrifices, Jesus' death was a sacrifice that really solved the problem of sin (Heb 7:27; 9:26; 10:4). Unlike the priests who entered the apartments of the Hebrew
sanctuary periodically, Jesus ministers constantly in the very presence of God (9:6-10, 24; 10:12). He thus provides a "new and living way" that gives us direct access to God (10:19). In view of all this, we can approach God with confidence and receive all the help we need
(4:16; 10:22).
were physically present somewhere on earth. The New Testament expressees this intimate connection between Christ and the church in several different ways. One is with the important symbol, the "body of Christ" (1 Cor 12:27).
THE CHURCH AS THE BODY OF CHRIST
Christ as Head of the church Our high priest As our high priest, Christ serves as our representative, or advocate, before God (1 John 2:1). Because he is human and knows what it is like to
The symbol of the body illuminates several important aspects of the
relation between Christ and the
church. As Christ's body, the church depends on him for its existence. He 1s the source of the church, not ony be tempted, he understands the
difficulties we face. He is able to as its founder, but as the power that
Sustains it moment by moment. The sympathize with us (Heb 2:18; 4:15), THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
church continually depends on Christ.
derives
its essential identity from
him. Individual
church members
but they do not determine what its
life shall be. It is Christ who makes
Pet 2:7). Another is the role Peter himself played in early Christianity. He was certainly a major figure, ana the Gospels consistently portray him as the leader of the disciples, but he
was by no means the single most
important authority in the church. On
one memorable occasion, the church
met in council to settle some
As Christ's body, the church also
participate in the life of the church,
the church important, not the other
way around..
As his body, the church
derives its significance from him.
The church is what it is because of
who Jesus is, not because of who its
members are.
The symbol of the body also
suggests subordination. As Christ's
body, the church is subject to his
authority. He is "the head over all
things for the church" (Eph 1:22).
Recognizing that Christ's authority in
the church is supreme prevents us
from exaggerating the importance of
any church official or organizational
structure. The church needs
important issues (Acts 15). Peter's
voice was one among several that
were heard, but it was James who
expressed the consensus of the group.
On another occasion, Paul publicly
criticized Peter for refusing to eat
with Gentiles (Gal 2:11-14).
This interpretation of Jesus statement also misunderstands the
nature of apostolic authority. What
made the apostles-and their
writings-important was their
firsthand testimony to Jesus. They
spoke out of personal experience.
They were also organizational
leaders, but it was their function as
organization, of course,
but no
organizational structure should
obscure Christ's authority. witnesses that mattered most, not the
office they occupied. Because this
function depended on a certainn
personal experience, it
could not be
passed on. Others could assume
their
organizational responsibilities, but
their witness to Christ was
Apostolic authority
Many believe that Jesus' statement
You are Peter, and on this rock I will
build my church" (Matt 16:18) gives
Peter and his presumed successors,
the bishops of Rome, supreme
authority over the church on earth.
But several things prevent us from
drawing this conclusion. One is the
fact that the New Testament
irreplaceable. In view of what really
made them apostles, then, the
conventional
notion of "apostolic
succession" is a
mistake. Doctrinal
agreement with the apostles is much
more important
than organizational
continuity. elsewhere speaks of Christ, not Peter,
as the rock, or the cornerstone, on
which the church is built (Eph 2.:20; 1 REIGN OF GE
among members of the body are. A be seriously handica without organs that have different functions (12:17-20). If we were
Members of the body The image of the body not only
illuminates the relation between
Christ and the church; it also has
powerful implications for the relation
of church members to each other. A
body is a complex unity, a single thing made of many different parts. Its oneness and its differentiation are
body would
nothing but an eye, for example, how would we hea The point is that the different members of the body need each other, none ot them can surviva alone. Finally, what the body's members experience, they experience together, as one. "If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together" (12:26). "Now you are the body of Christ," he concludes, "and individually members of it."
This striking illustration emphasizes the uniqueness and the importance of each church member. At the same time, it upholds the priority of unity, for it is only togethermess that gives individual abilities their purpose.
both important--in fact, they require each other. A body is nothing without its members, but it is togetherness that makes the members important. None of them could exist, or have
any purpose, apart from the others. Paul uses these ideas to
encourage unity among the Christians at Corinth in one of the most picturesque passages in his letter (1 Cor 12:12-27). The tendency of certain individuals to emphasize their unique abilities threatened to disrupt that early congregation. Paul compared the church to a human body to remind these people of their dependence on others and to encourage those with different, perhaps less conspicuous abilities to think of themselves as essential parts of the church, too.
He begins by affirming the essential unity of the body: "For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ" (12:12). Next, he asserts that each member is an
SPIRITUAL GIFTS
Paul's basic concern in 1 Cor 12-14 is church unity, but he speaks specifically to the issue of the spiritual gifts (see 12:1), the presence of different abilities among members of the church. From Paul's rather extensive discussion we learn several things about this important and often perplexing topic.
integral part of the body, regardless of how it feels (12:15-16). He then shows how important differences The source of spiritual gifts To begin with, the gifts all have the same source; they all come from THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
217 God. Since our gifts did not originate spiritual gift, any more than there are useless talents or meaningless organs of the body. The fact that some gifts are less conspicuous than others is no indication that they are less
with us, we can't1 take credit for them or congratulate ourselves for having them.
or We should also recognize that
the abilities of other people likewise come rom God, so there is no basis
important. Some of the least for personal rivalry in the differences that exist among church members.
In the second place, it is God who decides which abilities we receive. He gives different abilities to different people, so it should not
surprise or discourage us to find that
others have abilities we don't.
impressive gifts, in fact, may be downright vital to the life of the church, as Paul's analogy of the organs of the body indicates. The church needs all its gifts, just as the body needs all its members.
At the same time, some gifts are more important than others-not because they are the only ones that count, of course, but because they are
The purpose of spiritual gifts
Third, the purpose of the gifts is to contribute to the good of the entire church. In a sense, the gifts are given
to the church as a whole, not to the individuals within it. This has great
practical significance. It should lead us to view people in the church who can do important things as gifts to the rest of us. If certain people have a remarkable ability to explain the
Word of God, for example, our
reaction should not be to wonder why
they can do something we can't. Instead, we should regard their ability
as God's gift to the entire
congregation. The purpose of the
spiritual gifts is to benefit the church,
not to glorify the individual
members.
more fundamental to the mission of the church, or because their influence is more extensive than that of other gifts. Paul's list suggests a certain hierarchy among spiritual gifts: "And God has appointed in the church first
apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, then healers, helpers, administrators, speakers in various kinds of tongues" (1 Cor 12:28). Apostles head the list because their witness to Christ is the
very basis of the church. The gift of
tongues comes last, some believe, because those with this gift had
created problems at Corinth by
exaggerating their importance and
making others feel inferior. So Paul
puts them in their place. He assures
them that they are part of the church,
but they have no reason for personal The importance of spiritual gifts
Fourth, as far as God is concened,
all of the gifts are important. There is
no such thing as an insignificant
pride.
REIGN OF GOD
Charismatics typically identify Love: the greatest gift of all
Paul's discussion of spiritual gifts contains two additional elements that deserve our attention here. One is the
speaking in tongues with the baptism of the Holy Spirit. They believe that this phenomenon is an important indication of personal salvation,
It is not entirely clear from the New Testament just what the gift of tongues refers t0. At several points in the book of Acts, a remarkable
magnificent hymn to love, one of the most famous of all biblical passages (1 Cor 13). Its purpose in this context is to show that a spirit of self forgetful service is the most important thing anyone can have. It
will outlast every other gift (13:8) and without it, tongues, prophetic powers, understanding, and even faith are worthless (13:1-3). This relativizes the whole question of spiritual gifts by showing that the most important question is not, What have I received?, but, What am I giving? What motivates my activity?
manifestation of the Holy Spirit indicated that certain people had experienced God's saving power. This was true of the group meetingin the upper room at Pentecost (2:1-4). It occurred in Samaria following the baptism of several converts to Christianity (8:17), and it happened to Cornelius and members of his household during Peter's visit (10:44. 46). Such passages suggest that every genuine Christian should have the
experience. On the other hand, as we have
just seen, Paul describes tongues as one of several gifts of the Spirit to
the church. Since different members
The gift of tongues Paul also makes a series of suggestions about the appropriate exercise of the gift of tongues. He does not discourage the manifestation of this gift, but he doesn't want it to
disrupt worship services; and he indicates that other gifts, such as
prophecy, are more beneficial to the
congregation. The important thing to
keep in mind, he says, is that "all
things should be done decently and in order" (1 Cor 14:40).
The gift of tongues is a widely discussed religious issue today. The charismatic movement, as it is often called, has many followers, not only within various Pentecostal groups, but among Catholic and mainline Protestant churches, too.
have different gifts, it isn't something everyone should expect to receive. We shouldn't view this particular gift as an essential part of everyone's experience of salvation.
There is a further difference of
opinion as to what "speaking in
tongues" involved. In Acts 2 it
evidently enabled 1listeners from
different countries to hear what the
apostles had to say in their own
languages (2:6), so it facilitated the
communication of the gospel. In
Cor 12-14, however, it seems to be
THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
219 an ecstatic phenomenon rather than
gift is one of the identifying marks of God's people in the last days (Rev 12:17; 19:10), and they regard the ministry of Ellen G. White as a manifestation of this gift within their history.6
intelligible speech, and it doesn't articularly benefit other people (14:2-5, 9, 11, 19). To further complicate the situation, some
cholars believe that Pentecost was
an example of ecstatic utterance, while others maintain that the gift of
tongues at Corinth consisted off of
speaking different human languages.4 We may never know exactly
what speaking in tongues originally involved. It may be significant that
the Gospels never mention the phenomenon and that Jesus never
instructed his disciples on the matter. This, coupled with Paul's diseussion
of spiritual gifts, prevents us from concluding that everyone should seek
the experience. In addition, linguistic studies of contemporary glossolalia have failed to find the characteristics
Ellen White's life The general features of Ellen White's life are well known.7 She was born in 1827, one of eight children of Robert and Eunice Harmon. At the age of twelve, she accepted William Miller's message, along with her family, and looked forward to the soon return of Jesus. She was among the "little flock" of believers who survived the devastating disappointment of October 22, 1844, still believing that the Lord had led them.
Two years later she married James White, a young Adventist preacher some six years her senior. They had four children, all boys, of whom only two survived to
of a genuine language.5 We are therefore justified in being cautious about the phenomenon. At the same
time, we should not be eager to discredit the experience out of hand.
We must be open to different manifestations of the Spirit's power. God may have some surprises for us,
Just as he did for his people in
apostolic times.
adulthood. She and James labored tirelessly during the formative years of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. After his death in 1881, her work not
only continued, but expanded. She
spent two years in Europe in the mid-
1880s and lived in Australia from
1890 to the turm of the century.
Returning to the United States, she
made her home in California, where
she died in 1915 at the age of eighty-ELLEN G. WHITE AND THE GIFT OF PROPHECY
seven.
The gift of prophecy is particularly important to Seventh-day Adventists.
They believe that the presence of this
Ellen White regarded public
speaking as her particular talent,8 but
she is best known today as a prolific
REIGN OF GOD
220
The doctrine of spiritual gifts, including the gift of prophecy, is One of the teachings of Scripture, 10
writer. During her lifetime, she
contributed well over four thousand
articles to various denominational
publications. She authored several
dozen books on a wide range of topics, and she conducted a vigorous
correspondence with people all over
the world.
one
The Biblical Tests of a Prophet The New Testament encourages believers to examine purported prophetic claims in at least two different passages. Paul urges his readers to avoid skepticism (1 Thess 5:19-23); John urges his to avoid being gullible (1 John 4:1). They both recommend testing a person's messages to see if they are from God
Ellen White's visions The most remarkable aspect of her life consisted in the unusual experiences to which she attributed her messages. She typically referred to them as "visions." The first occurred in December 1844, a few weeks after the Great
Disappointment, when she was barely seventeen years old. There were
hundreds in the years that followed. During these experiences she received spiritual instruction or
messages of practical religious value in the form of vivid sensory impressions. She was instructed to communicate their contents to certain
Faithfulness to the Bible
Assuming that the Bible is divinely authoritative, Seventh-day Adventists have traditionally applied several different biblical tests to the work of Ellen White.11 Perhaps the most important is agreement with Scripture (see Isa 8:20). If the Holy Spirit lies behind a person's work, his or her teaching will harmonize with the teachings of the Bible, because God will not contradict himself. He will
individuals, in some cases, and to the church at large, in others. Ellen White never assumed the
not say one thing in the Bible and another through a later prophet. title "prophet" for herself", but she did not object when others applied it to her. She did claim that divine A biblical view of Christ The second test is really an extension of the first. It consists of agreement with the biblical doctrine of the
authority lay behind her instruction. Seventh-day Adventists believe that her ministry is a manifestation of the gift of prophecy described in the New Testament. In fact, Adventists often assert that they believe in Ellen White's prophetic status precisely because they believe in the Bible.
incarnation. "Every spirit which confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God" (1 John 4:2). A true prophet will affirm the genuine humanity of Jesus.
THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
221
A beneficial ministry predicted something remarkable that
The third test involves the effects offa came to pass (Deut 13:1-3). Per
against false prophets, saying, "You
person's ministry. Jesus warmed
against fal
will know them y their fruits" (Matt
7:16, 20). A divinely authorized ministry will yield positive results; an
On the other hand, unfulfilled predictions do not necessarily discredit a prophet. A message borne from God may not always come to pass. Jonah, for example, had God's command to forecast Nineveh's destruction, but the city was not destroyed. This doesn't mean that
Adventists, one of the most
convincing features of Ellen White's
imposter's ministry will not. To early
ministry was the fact that the work of Jonah was not a true prophet. God
the church prospered when they
followed her advice and suffered
when they ignored it. 12
When you consider most of the
decided to preserve Nineveh because its inhabitants repented.
The principle involved here is
that of "conditional prophecy,"which things that Seventh-day Adventists are we mentioned in the doctrine of God.
known for, her influence is clearly There are predictions, both promises visible. She urged her husband to start and threats, whose fulfillment depends a publishing work, she strongly
encouraged the development of work
in other countries of the world, and
she led out in health reform and in
on the response of human beings. If,
supported denominational schools, she as in Jonah's case, people turn from
their sins, threats of destruction will
not be fulfilled. Similarly, turning
away from God will thwart his desire
establishing medical training facilities.13
to bless (see Jer 18:1-11). Seventh-day Adventists have
applied these different tests to Ellen
White's life and work for over a
Fulfilled prophecies Last, and probably least in
importance, is the test of fulfilled pre-
dictions. According to certain biblical directly involved in her ministry, and
passages, the predictions of a true pro- that she deserves to be regarded as a
phet will come to pass (see Jer 28:9),
while those of a false prophet will not. her status in the church has always
There are important qualifications for
this test, however. On the one hand,
rulfilled predictions do not always
guarantee the reliability of a prophet's have refused to make belief in her
ministry. The Israelites were
instructed to ignore any suggestion to
follow other gods, even if its author
century and a half. The process has
strengthened their belief that God was
prophet. At the same time, however,
been widely discussed and carefully
qualified. From the beginning, for
example, Seventh-day Adventists
prophetic gift a formal "test of fellow
ship," although the Statement of
Fundamental Beliefs voted in 1980
REIGN OF GOD
222
we seem to undermine her prophetic may represent a departure from this
practice14 Of the various questions conceming Ellen White's prophetic
status, two in particular have stimu-
lated widespread discussion among
Seventh-day Adventists in recent
years. One is the relation of her
writings to the Bible; the other is the
nature of her inspiration.
status.16 Is it possible to accept th Bible as supremely authoritative : also to regard Ellen White as a and
prophet? What, precisely, is her relation to Scripture?
Ellen G. White's view of the Bible Ellen White's own comments are helpful on this point. She has a great deal to say about the Bible and its relation to her writings. To begin with, she strongly supports the importance of the Bible and asserts that the Bible is indispensable as a source of knowledge about God. It contains
They accept the Reformation principle everything we need to know for
salvation.17 It is the supreme religious authority; nothing will ever replace or
as the authoritative guide for Christian supersede it. It is the test of all other manifestations of the Spirit. 18
Ellen White also spoke about the appropriate interpretation of the Bible. She urged Christians to engage in per- sonal Bible study;19 in fact, she de- scribed this as the highest duty of every rational being,20 According to her, the meaning of the Bible is available to every honest student. We must lay aside our preconceptions Adventists regard Ellen G. White as a and allow the Bible to be its own
ELLEN G. WHITE AND BIBLICAL AUTHORITY
Seventh-day Adventists have always identified themselves as Protestants.
of sola Scriptura, as it is sometimes
called, which affirms the Bible alone
faith and practice. The first of the
church's Fundamental Beliefs, for example, asserts, "The Holy
Scriptures are the infallible revelation of His [God's] will. They are the
standard of character, the test of experience, the authoritative revealer of doctrines, and the trustworthy record of God's acts in history."15
At the same time, Seventh-day
prophet. They believe that the Spirit who inspired the writings of the Bible
interpreter.22 was also responsible for her messages. Ellen White's view of herself This creates an apparent dilemma. If When it comes to her own writings, we hold that Ellen White's inspiration Ellen White maintained that she was identical to that of the Bible, we seem to compromise the Protestant principle of the Bible only. If we subordinate her writings to Scripture,
received her messages from God and
that they deserve to be carefully studied. But she clearly subordinated them to the Bible. Their essential
THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN cOMMUNITY
223
purpose, she said, is to emphasize
what we find in the Bible. "Th writ-
light," in her words, "but to impress
Bible to a position of supreme authority for the first time, nor, for that matter, does it imply that the Bible is the only thing of religious
ten testimonies are not to give new
vividly upon the heart the truths of
inspiration already revealed."23 In
fact, they would not even be needed
if Deople had paid enough attention to
the Bible itself to start with.24
We can summarize Ellen White's
interest that Christians should ever read. What it really did was remove
everything standing between the Bible and the church in the way of an authoritative guide or interpreter. The prevalent position of the day acknow-
ledged the supreme authority of the Bible, but it insisted that the Bible
own position, then, by saying that the
Bible is the supreme and
comprehensive source of religious
knowledge. The purpose of her writings is to enhance our appre-
ciation of the Bible by emphasizing,
explaining, and applying its contents.
must be interpreted by the church. In so doing, it interposed tradition, or church doctrine, between believers and the Bible. The principle of sola
Scriptura removes this intermediary. It insists on direct contact with the
The supremacy of biblical
authority If we are faithful to Ellen White's
Bible. If Seventh-day Adventists adhere
to this important principle, they will not treat Ellen White as an infallible own position, we will avoid placingg
her on a level with Scripture. In
practice, as well as theory, we will
give the Bible the first and last word
in religious matters. It is not enough to assert that we judge Ellen White
by the Bible, and not the Bible by Ellen White. If the authority of the
Bible is truly supreme for us, it will
do more than establish Ellen White's
prophetic status. It will continue to
serve as our primary object of study, and we will support our doctrinal
positions by direct appeals to Scripture.
interpreter of the Bible. They will not allow her writings to distract them
from the study of the Seriptures, or
regard them as a shorteut to their
meaning. They will insist that every
biblical interpretation, including those that appear in Ellen White's
writings, be supported by direct
appeals to the Bible.
ELLEN G. WHITE AND
PROPHETIC INSPIRATION
This will keep us faithful to the classical Protestant position. The Reformation emphasis on the pri- macy of Scripture did not elevate the
A question of equal importance to
Seventh-day Adventists concerns the
nature of Ellen White's inspiration.
Since the early 1970s students of her
REIGN OF GOD
224
Adventists to accept the familiar view that she received the contene
Writings have
discovered that her
literary indebtedness is a more
complicated phenomenon
than most
people ever realized.
her writings in vision and turmedto of
other sources for occasional
assistance in expressing herself,29 There are those who believe tho
have largely misunderstood the nature of Ellen White's work, and a few have lost confidence in her
prophetic ministry.30 Many believe however, that we can modify our
understanding of inspiration to
accommodate the available data,
There are several possible
we Ellen White's literary
indebtedness For years it was general knowledge
that she employed various historical
works in writing The Great
Controversy. The 1911 edition, in
fact, gave credit to her sources. We
know that she used published
materials extensively in composingg
many of her other books, too. Her
writings on health, for example,
closely resemble views held by others in her time.25 Some have
approaches.
Proposed solutions: The guidance
of the Holy Spirit
suggested that a few of her best-loved A familiar suggestion is that she used
devotional books, such as The Desire
of Ages, are more like compilations of material than or+ginal
compositions,26 There is even
evidence that she sometimes
sources under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The Spirit not only
imparted a message to her, but directed her to select material that would aid her in expressing it effectively. This is possible. It is also
possible that the content of some of
her visions coincided with material
employed words she had previously read somewhere in transcribing what
she received in vision.27
In addition, the role of her
literary assistants, such as Marian Davis, now appears larger than before. They did not merely proofread her manuscripts for grammatical errors and transpose paragraphs. They collected material for her books, and sometimes they deleted large portions of what she herself had written (though not without her approval).28
These discoveries make it
already familiar to her. There is
nothing about the simple idea of
inspiration that requires total
originality. But this approach requires us to abandon a familiar argument tor
her inspiration. We can no longer
regard her as an uneducated woman
who couldn't possibly have
developed her material by any tural
means.
There is also a problem with the
view that the Spirit guided in her
selection of sources. Historians impossible for many Seventh-day THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
225
her use of sources obscures. generally regard some of The Great
Controversy S Sources as rather p0or
history. In the opinion of many
scholars, for example, Wylie and
d'Aubigne are not reliable historians
and they were not the best historians
available in Ellen White's time.31
Unconscious indebtedness One striking proposal is that Ellen White did not realize the extent of her dependence on other writers. We often meet some of our "original" ideas in books we have read and
Others' words, her ideas
A similar suggestion is that Ellen
White incorporated the words of others to express ideas she received
in vision. So, although much of the
material was derived, the overarching them her own. Besides, Ellen White framework of thought was her own.
One problem with this is the difficulty of separating Ellen White's own concepts from the ideas
presented in some of the works she
employed. In many cases, she seems
to include the ideas as well as the
forgotten about. Ellen White may have had similar experiences. Perhaps she expressed, as her own, ideas which she first encountered in other writings, because she had made
was primarily concermed with the
content of ideas, rather than their
source. She believed that God was the ultimate author of all truth. Accordingly, when she read something that impressed her, she naturally attributed it to God.33
verbal formulations of her sources. The note of divine authority There is another response to the
similarity between much of Ellen White's writings and other material. This is to emphasize the tone, rather than the content, of her messages.
According to this suggestion, we see
inspiration primarily in the note of
divine authority with which she
wrote. Others may have said similar
things; but when she spoke, the
church listened and obeyed.34
This response shifts the focus of
attention from the production of Ellen
White's messages to her role in the
community. In the final analysis, this
may be where the question of her
inspiration must be decided. Each
On the other hand, there is an
important precedent for such a
distinction in the Bible itself. The consensus among biblical scholars is
that Matthew and Luke copied
extensively from Mark.32 They follow Mark's overall outline of Jesus' ministry, and they reproduce many of its passages virtually word for word. Yet in spite of their
Similarities, each of the so-called ynoptic Gospels has its distinctive perspective on the life of Jesus. Literary dependence does not exclude Considerable originality. Perhaps urther literary analysis will reveal an
originality in Ellen White's works That the current preoccupation with
REIGN OF GOD
226
person evaluates the impact of her ministry on his or her own life, and the community as a whole reaches a
consensus as to her prophetic status. One merit of this approach is its
concem with the larger question of
revelation. Instead of concentrating narrowly on the production of her writings, its perspective takes into account her role in the larger cycle of God's communication with his
ourselves, we tend to feel, what sets us apart from other people, is the
most authentic expression of our personal identity, the highest fulfillment of our significance. But the portrait of the church we find in the New Testament clashes sharply with this perspective.
According to the apostles, the church is the primary sphere of salvation. Naturally, many people will say, in the normal course of things those who are saved will join the church. Most Christians
people. The nature of Ellen White's
ministry is one of those areas where the church's thinking is currently developing. What we have learned requires us to reexamine our concept of prophetic inspiration. But those for whom her writings have been of great spiritual benefit are hardly inclined to discard them. Clearly, this is an area where more theological work needs to be done, and where the community
eventually do. But this concession barely touches the meaning of the statement. As the earliest Christians discovered-to their considerable amazement-salvation not only happens within human beings; it is also something that happens between human beings. It transforms relationships, not just individual attitudes and behavior.
needs to be sensitive to the views of all its members.
To be sure, salvation brings about an inner change, a dramatic reordering of our priorities, the establishment of a new relationship with God (topics to be discussed in future chapters of this book). But it does much more. It brings into existence a community of people whose openness to one another, whose afirmation of one another, whose care for one another, whose
COMMUNITY OF THE SPIRIT
The use Paul makes of "body" language in describing the church clearly establishes the priority of the community to the individual. As we noted earlier, our modern preoccupation with the individual makes it difficult for many of us to accept this idea. We are inclined to regard the individual as the primary unit of human reality and the ultimate object of value. What we are by
commitment to one another's welfare transcend anything of which human beings are naturally capable. So important is this kind of relationship that John describes its existence as THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
227
the acid test or a true Christian. "We mutuality within the church-for the openness and care that Christians show toward each other. Since we are
know that know thar we have passed from death
one another(1 John 3:14 [NRSV]). to
life,"1 he writes, pecause we love
all members of Christ's body (1 Cor 12:27), we all have similar privileges and responsibilities, whatever our distinctive spiritual gift. No Christian Occupies a higher spiritual plane than another. The Reformers
Created by the power of the Holy
Spirit, then, the church is a
community characterized by
inclusiveness and mutuality. This
means that church membership is
open to all people, whatever their race, sex, nationality, social status, and financial condition. None of the things that typically isolate people from each other are barriers to
participation. It came as a surprise to the earliest Christian leaders, who
were predominantly Jewish males, that women, Gentiles, and slaves could be full-fledged members of the church. But this is what makes the
acknowledged this with their concept of the priesthood of all believers. There is no privileged class within the church. The work of ministry belongs to the whole people of God.
In terms of our guiding theme, the church manifests the reign of God in human history. The power of the
Spirit creates a community whose members love for one another reflects and communicates the love of
church unique. It is open to everyone. This equality is the basis for
God for all humankind.
STUDY HELPS
Questions for review
. What is the relation between personal salvation and church membership?
What makes the church unique among human groups and organizations? 2.
What are the primary symbols the New Testament applies to the church?
How is the church like the nation of Israel? How is it different?
5 What are the nature and source of authority in the church?
6. What are the characteristics of spiritual gits?
REIGN OF GOD
228
What do the gift of tongues and the gift of prophecy, respecsi. 7. ively, involve? 8. What biblical tests do Seventh-day Adventists apply to Ellen
ministry?
oly to Ellen G. White's
9. What are some of the recent questions concerning Ellen Whitel.
Questions for discussion
get more out of worshiping God by themselves than being with other Christians. How do you respond to this attitude?
can 10. Certain people insist that they don't need the church. They
11. Sometimes a group of people with modest abilities can accomplish moe than an equal number of more talented individuals. (You can probahl think of examples in areas like sports and music.) Why is this so? What does this imply about the Christian church?
nore
12. In apostolic times, the Christian church thrived in the face of intense opposition. In contrast, there is little interest in religion in much of the so- called "Christian" world today. When is adversity spiritually beneficial? Why?
13. Of all ancient peoples, only the Jews survive today, and modern Israel has a remarkable history. Is there a religious explanation for these phenomena Are there other explanations?
14. How can a person find out what his or her spiritual gifts are?
15. How would you go about explaining the ministry of Ellen G. White to
someone for the first time?
Suggestions for Bible study
l6. What do we learn about the church from the following biblical symD0 bols?
Rom 1:7; 1 Cor 1:2; Eph 1:1; Phil 1:1; Col 1:2 b. 2 Cor 4:5; Gal 5:13 c. 1 Pet 2:4-5; Col 1:13; Matt 5:3; 2 Cor 6:16
a.
26 d. m 3:15; Eph 2:19; Matt 23:8: 1 Cor 6:5: 1 Pet 2:17; Rom7.4 THE CHURCH: THE REIGN OF GOD AS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
229
Eph 5:25-27
Cor 3:5-9; Acts 20:28; 1 Pet 5:2; John 10:16
. 2 Cor 5:17; Eph 2:15
17 People sometimes think of the apostolic church as relatively free from internal difficulties. But what do the following passages indicate about
some of the problems early Christians faced? How do their dificulties compare with those of Christians today?
Acts 6:1; Acts 15:36-40; 1 Cor 1:10-12 b. Acts 11:1-3; Gal 2:11-16; Phil 3:2-3
2 Cor 11:2-5; Gal 1:6-9; 1 John 4:1
d. 1 Cor 5:1-2; 1 Tim 1:19-20
18. Read through the first twelve chapters of Acts. List the ways in which the
Holy Spirit operated in the life of the earliest Christian community.
19. Some people make a sharp distinction between the gift of the Holy Spirit mentioned in Acts (e.g., 2:38; 8:17; 10:44-47) and the spiritual gifts referred to in Paul's letters (e.g., 1 Cor 12:4-11, 28; Eph 4:11). In your
view, how are these related?
20. How do you reconcile the equality among church members presented in
texts such as Gal 3:28 with the apparent affirmation of social and sexual
differences within the church in texts such as Eph 5:22-23; 6:5-9; 1 Tim
2:11-15?
21. Rom 9-11 is one of the most important New Testament passages dealing
with the spiritual destiny of the people of Israel. From your study of these
chapters, what is the relation between Israel and the church?
SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER READING
From Adventist writers
doctrine of the church remains one of the least-developed aspects of Seventh-day
aventist theology. But although Adventist writers have devoted relatively little attention to
dOctrine as such, certain aspects of it have received a good deal of study.
en G. White discusses the nature of the church in several important passages,
pecially in some of her later works, She describes the purpose of God's call to Israel and
alion between Israel and the church in Prophets and Kings, pp. 15-22, 703-721. She
eTS the origin and destiny of the church in The Acts of the Apostles, pp. 9-16, 593-602.
AOW of no book-length discussion of the doctrine of the church by an Adventist
REIGN OF GOD