5-10 Page Executive Summary (ESSAY) on Lecture Slides

profileJohnWick321
Chapter8.pptx

Chapter 8: Corporate Strategy

List and define the three concentration strategies

Explain the benefits of vertical integration

Describe the two types of diversification and when they should be used

Give examples of retrenchment and restructuring

Describe why portfolio planning is useful for corporations

Page 1

Concentration Strategies

Concentration strategies: Strategies that firms use to try to successfully compete only within a single industry

There are three concentration strategies:

Market penetration

Market development

Product development

8-2

Concentration Strategies

8-3

Concentration Strategies

8-4

Concentration Strategies

8-5

Concentration Strategies

Horizontal integration: Pursuing a concentration strategy by acquiring or merging with a rival

Types of horizontal integration:

Acquisition

Merger

8-6

Concentration Strategies

Acquisition: Takes place when one company purchases another company

The acquired company is smaller than the firm that purchases it

Merger: Joining of two companies into one

Involves similarly sized companies

8-7

Concentration Strategies

Horizontal integration can be attractive for several reasons:

Aimed at lowering costs by achieving greater economies of scale

Provide access to new distribution channels

Despite the potential benefits of mergers and acquisitions, their financial results often are very disappointing

More than 60 percent of mergers and acquisitions erode shareholder wealth

Fewer than one in six increases shareholder wealth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dFvhq2sKfM

8

Vertical Integration Strategies

Vertical integration: When a firm gets involved in new portions of the value chain

Can be very attractive when a firm’s suppliers or buyers have too much power over the firm and are becoming increasingly profitable at the firm’s expense

By entering the domain of a supplier or a buyer, executives can reduce or eliminate the leverage that the supplier or buyer has over the firm

Can create risks

Can create complacency

8-9

Vertical Integration Strategies

Backward vertical integration: A strategy that involves a firm entering a supplier’s business

Used when executives are concerned that a supplier has too much power over their firms

Forward vertical integration: A strategy that involves a firm entering a buyer’s business

Useful for neutralizing the effect of powerful buyers

8-10

Vertical Integration Strategies

11

Risk of not being vertically integrated

12

The risk of not being vertically integrated is illustrated by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Although the US government held BP responsible for the disaster, BP cast at least some of the blame on drilling rig owner Transocean and two other suppliers: Halliburton Energy Services (which created the cement casing for the rig on the ocean floor) and Cameron International Corporation (which had sold Transocean blowout prevention equipment that failed to prevent the disaster). In April 2011, BP sued these three firms for what it viewed as their roles in the oil spill.

12

Diversification Strategies

Diversification strategies: Involve a firm entering entirely new industries

Requires moving into new value chains

Three tests for diversification:

How attractive is the industry that a firm is considering entering?

How much will it cost to enter the industry?

Will the new unit and the firm be better off?

8-13

Diversification Strategies

Related diversification: When a firm moves into a new industry that has important similarities with the firm’s existing industry or industries

Core competency: A skill set that is difficult for competitors to imitate, can be leveraged in different businesses, and contributes to the benefits enjoyed by customers within each business

8-14

Diversification Strategies

Unrelated diversification: When a firm enters an industry that lacks any important similarities with the firm’s existing industry or industries

Most unrelated diversification efforts do not have happy endings

8-15

Unrelated Diversification

16

Strategies for Getting Smaller-Retrenchment

Retrenchment: Reducing the size of part of a firm’s operations, often through laying off employees

Firms following a retrenchment strategy shrink one or more of their business units

Firms using this strategy hope to make just a small retreat rather than losing a battle for survival

8-17

Strategies for Getting Smaller-Restructuring

Diversification discount: The tendency of investors to undervalue the shares of a diversified firm

Divestment: Selling off part of a firm’s operations

Spin-off: Creating a new company whose stock is owned by investors out of a piece of a bigger company

Liquidation: Shutting down portions of a firm’s operations, often at a tremendous financial loss

8-18

Investors often struggle to understand the complexity of diversified firms, and this can result in relatively poor performance by the stocks of such firms. This is known as a diversification discount. Executives sometimes attempt to unlock hidden shareholder value by breaking up diversified companies.

18

Spin-offs

19

Portfolio Planning and Corporate Level Strategy

Portfolio planning: A process that helps executives make decisions involving their firms’ various industries

Offers suggestions about what to do within each industry, and provides ideas for how to allocate resources across industries.

It first gained widespread attention in the 1970s and it remains a popular tool among executives today

8-20

Portfolio Planning and Corporate Level Strategy

The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix

Best-known approach to portfolio planning

Using the matrix requires a firm’s businesses to be categorized as high or low along two dimensions:

Its share of the market

The growth rate of its industry

8-21

Portfolio Planning and Corporate Level Strategy

8-22

Portfolio Planning and Corporate Level Strategy

Limitations to portfolio planning:

Oversimplifies the reality of competition by focusing on just two dimensions when analyzing a company’s operations within an industry

Can create motivational problems among employees

Does not help identify new opportunities

8-23

Research Round-Up: Divestiture and Firm Performance

For decades, executives have faced the dilemma of deciding when it might be wise to spin-off or sell parts of their firms.

A recent research study combined the findings of 94 previous studies of divestiture determined that divestiture activities help firm performance.

In addition, firms with strategic motivations to divest outperformed those that lacked a strategic rationale for divestment.

Executives must carefully manage their collection of corporate assets and be willing to sell them if the right opportunity arises.

24

Chapter 8: Key Takeaways

Executives grappling with corporate-level strategy must decide in what industry or industries their firms will compete. Many of the possible answers to this question involve growth.

Concentration strategies involve competing within existing domains to expand within those domains. This can take the form of market penetration, market development, or product development.

Integration involves expanding into new stages of the value chain.

Backward integration occurs when a firm enters a supplier’s business while forward vertical integration occurs when a firm enters a customer’s business.

Diversification involves entering entirely new industries; this can be an industry that is related or unrelated to a firm’s existing activities.

Sometimes being smart about corporate-level strategy requires shrinking the firm through retrenchment or restructuring.

Portfolio planning can be useful for analyzing firms that participate in a wide variety of industries.

25