HR
Staffing Organizations
Chapter 8:
External Selection I
©McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom. No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Learning Objectives for Chapter 8
Understand how the logic of prediction guides the selection process
Review the nature of predictors—how selection measures differ
Understand the process involved in developing a selection plan, and the selection sequence
Learn about initial assessment methods and understand how these methods are optimally used in organizations
Evaluate the relative effectiveness of initial assessment methods to determine which work best, and why
©McGraw-Hill Education.
External Selection I
Preliminary Issues
©McGraw-Hill Education
Logic of Prediction: Past Performance Predicts Future Performance
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Nature of Predictors
Content
Sign: A predisposition thought to relate to performance (e.g., personality)
Sample: Observing behavior thought to relate to performance
Criterion: Actual measure of prior performance
Discriminant validity is demonstrated by evidence that measures of constructs that theoretically should not be highly related to each other are, in fact, not found to be highly correlated to each other
Form
Speed vs. power: How many versus what level
Paper / pencil vs. performance: Test in writing or in behavior
Objective vs. essay: Much like multiple-choice vs. essay course exam questions
Oral vs. written vs. computer: How data are obtained
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Selection Plan
External selection refers to the assessment and evaluation of external job applicants
Selection plan
the basic purpose of a selection plan is to describe predictors to be used to assess KSAOs required to perform the job
It starts by listing relevant KSAOs associated with a job
important for internal selection to avoid the problems of favoritism and gut instinct that can be especially prevalent in internal selection
Organizations are increasingly finding that the benefits of developing a selection plan outweigh the costs
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Steps in Development of the Selection Plan
Develop list of KSAOs required for job
KSAOs are provided by job requirements matrix
For each KSAO, decide if it needs to be assessed in the selection process
Determine method(s) of assessment to be used for each KSAO
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Applicant Methods By Applicant Flow Stage
Initial assessment methods
Minimize the costs associated with substantive assessment methods by reducing the number of people assessed
Substantive assessment methods
Used to make more precise decisions about candidates
More involved than initial assessment methods
©McGraw-Hill Education.
External Selection I
Initial Assessment Methods
©McGraw-Hill Education
The necessity of Background information
Background information about job applicants can come not only from the applicant but also from people familiar with the applicant (e.g. employers, creditors, and neighbors).
Organizations often solicit this information on their own or use the services agencies that specialize in investigating applicants.
Background information solicited from others consists of letters of recommendation, reference checks, and background checks.
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Resumes and Cover Letters
Information provided is controlled by applicant
Information needs to be verified by other predictors to ensure accuracy and completeness
Major issues
Large number received by organizations
Falsification and misrepresentation of information
Lack of research exists related to
Validity or reliability
Costs
Adverse impact
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Overview of Application Blanks
Areas covered
Educational experience
Training
Job experience
Key advantage -- Organization dictates information provided
Major issue -- Information requested should
Be critical to job success and
Reflect KSAOs relevant to job
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Application Blanks
Areas of special interest
Educational requirements
Level of education
GPA
Quality of school
Major field of study
Extracurricular activities
Training and experience requirements
Licensing, certification, and job knowledge
Weighted application blanks are better
Unweighted correlation with performance from.10 to .20
Weighted correlations are substantially higher
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Biographical Information/Biodata
Personal history information of applicant’s background and interests
“Best predictor of future behavior is past behavior”
Past behaviors may reflect ability or motivation
Biodata compared with background checks
Background check
examines an applicant’s background
conducted through records checks and conversations with references
Biodata
used to predict future performance
information is collected by survey
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Biodata
Biodata is like a background check in many ways, but background checks tend to focus on external references rather than applicant surveys. In biodata and background tests, background information is obtained through interviews and conversations with references
Biodata measures include items about past events and behaviors reflecting personality attributes, attitudes, experiences, interests, skills and abilities validated as predictors of overall performance for a given occupation. It is collected directly from job applicants via highly structured multiple-choice questionnaires and typically includes the kinds of data obtained on job application blanks, in some employment interviews, in personnel files, or in autobiographies
Biodata measures are based on the measurement principle of behavioral consistency, that is, past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. It is the pattern of responses across several different situations that give biographical data the power to predict future behavior on the job
Biodata method is the most valid predictor of performance, in contrast to initial interviews, Handwriting analysis, unweighted application blanks. Biographical information tends to have high reliability
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Examples of Biodata Items
In college, my grade point average was:
I did not go to college or completed less than two years
Less than 2.50
2.50 to 3.00
3.00 to 3.50
3.50 to 4.00
In the past five years, the number of different jobs I have held is:
More than five
Three-five
Two
One
None
The kind of supervision I like best is:
Very close supervision
Fairly close supervision
Moderate supervision
Minimal supervision
No supervision
When you are angry, which of the following behaviors most often describes your reaction:
Reflect on the situation for a bit
Talk to a friend or spouse
Exercise or take a walk
Physically release the anger on something
Just try to forget about it
Biodata compared with background checks
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Reference Reports: Letters of Recommendation
Problems
Inability to discern more-qualified from less-qualified applicants
Lack of standardization
Suggestions to improve credibility
Use a structured form
Use a standardized scoring key
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Reference Reports: Reference Checks
Approach involves verifying applicant’s background via contact with
Prior immediate supervisor(s) or
HR department of current of previous companies
Roughly 8 of 10 companies conduct reference checks
Problems
Same as problems with letters of recommendation
Reluctance of companies to provide requested information due to legal concerns
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Reference Reports: Background Testing
Method involves assessing reliability of applicants’ behavior, integrity, and personal adjustment
Type of information requested
Criminal history
Credit information
Educational history
Employment verification
Driver license histories
Workers’ compensation claims
Key issues
Limited validity evidence
Legal constraints on pre-employment inquiries
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Initial Interview
Characteristics
Begins process of necessary differentiation
Purpose -- Screen out most obvious cases of person / job mismatches
Limitation -- Most expensive method of initial assessment
Video and computer interviews
Offers cost savings
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Evaluation of Initial Interview
Minimal evidence exists regarding usefulness
Guidelines to enhance usefulness
Ask questions assessing most basic KSAOs
Stick to basic, fundamental questions suitable for making rough cuts rather than subjective questions
Keep interviews brief
Ask same questions of all applicants
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Choice of Initial Assessment Methods, 1
| Predictor | Use | Cost | Reliability | Validity | Utility | Applicant Reactions | Adverse Impact |
| Résumé and cover letter | High | Low | Low | ? | ? | Positive | Moderate |
| Level of education | High | Low | Moderate | Low | Low | ? | Moderate |
| Grade point average | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Moderate | ? | ? | Moderate |
| Quality of school | Low | Low | Moderate | Low | ? | ? | Moderate |
| Major field of study | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Moderate | ? | ? | ? |
| Extracurricular activity | ? | Low | Moderate | Moderate | ? | ? | ? |
| Training and experience | High | Low | High | Moderate | Moderate | ? | Moderate |
| Licensing and certification | Moderate | Low | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Choice of Initial Assessment Methods, 2
| Predictor | Use | Cost | Reliability | Validity | Utility | Applicant Reactions | Adverse Impact |
| Weighted application blanks | Low | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | ? | ? |
| Biographical data | Low | High | High | High | High | Negative | Moderate |
| Letters of recommendation | Moderate | Low | Low | Low | ? | ? | ? |
| Reference check | High | Moderate | Low | Low | Moderate | Mixed | Moderate |
| Background check | Moderate | High | ? | ? | ? | ? | Moderate |
| Initial interview | High | High | Low | Low | ? | Positive | Moderate |
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Initial Assessment Reflections
Initial Assessment methods include Résumés and cover letters, Application blanks, Biographical information. Cost is used to guide the choice of initial assessment methods
A major problem with initial interviews is that it has relatively low reliability. To improve the effectiveness of initial interviews, interviewer should ask questions which assess the most basic KSAOs. The purpose of the initial interview is to screen out the most obvious cases of person/job mismatches
A major problem with resumes and cover letters is misrepresentation
A drawback of letters of recommendation is its inability to help separate highly qualified from moderately qualified applicants
In a reference check, the most common person to be contacted is the applicant's former supervisor
Common sources of résumé fraud are inflated titles, inflated education or "purchased" degrees, inaccurate dates to cover up job hopping or unemployment
Most surveys suggest that around half of all résumés have substantial inaccuracies or distortions
One of the major disadvantages of using handwriting analysis as an assessment method is that it is not related to job performance
©McGraw-Hill Education.
In what ways are application blanks, biographical information, and reference and background checks similar and in what ways are they different?
The three are similar to each other in that they both ask applicants to report on their background.
All three methods can also be used to make initial selection decisions about job applicants.
One difference between application blanks and biographical data is that biographical data can be used for substantive selection decisions.
Reference reports differ from biodata in that reference checks are used for screening applicants for positions which require integrity & emotional adjustment, biodata is used for a wider range of jobs.
In addition, reference reports are obtained through interviews and conversations with references while biodata is collected through a survey.
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Each Biodata item can be classified according to TEN criteria. Explain these criteria
History: Does the item describe an event that occurred in the past or a future or hypothetical event?
Externality: Does the item address an observable event or an internal event such as values or judgments?
Objectively: Does the item focus on reporting factual information or subjective interpretations?
First-handedness: Does the item seek information that is directly available to the applicant rather than an evaluation of the applicant’s behavior by others?
Discreteness: Does the item pertain to a single, unique behavior or a simple count of events as opposed to summary responses?
©McGraw-Hill Education.
Verifiability: Can the accuracy of the response to the item be confirmed?
Controllability: Does the item address an event that the applicant controlled?
Equal accessibility: Are the events or experiences expressed in the item equally accessible to all applicants?
Job relevance: Does the item solicit information closely tied to the job?
Invasiveness: is the item sensitive to the applicant’s right to privacy?
©McGraw-Hill Education.