Data Excericse #2 Macroeconomics 2 page report and charts

Chapter 6: The Macroeconomic Perspective in the text Principles of Macroeconomics by OpenStax is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. © Feb 25, 2016 OpenStax.

6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

Figure 6.1 The Great Depression At times, such as when many people are in need of government assistance, it is easy to tell how the economy is doing. This photograph shows people lined up during the Great Depression, waiting for relief checks. At other times, when some are doing well and others are not, it is more difficult to ascertain how the economy of a country is doing. (Credit: modification of work by the U.S. Library of Congress/Wikimedia Commons)

How is the Economy Doing? How Does One Tell? The 1990s were boom years for the U.S. economy. The late 2000s, from 2007 to 2014 were not. What causes the economy to expand or contract? Why do businesses fail when they are making all the right decisions? Why do workers lose their jobs when they are hardworking and productive? Are bad economic times a failure of the market system? Are they a failure of the government? These are all questions of macroeconomics, which we will begin to address in this chapter. We will not be able to answer all of these questions here, but we will start with the basics: How is the economy doing? How can we tell?

The macro economy includes all buying and selling, all production and consumption; everything that goes on in every market in the economy. How can we get a handle on that? The answer begins more than 80 years ago, during the Great Depression. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his economic advisers knew things were bad—but how could they express and measure just how bad it was? An economist named Simon Kuznets, who later won the Nobel Prize for his work, came up with a way to track what the entire economy is producing. The result—gross domestic product (GDP)—remains our basic measure of macroeconomic activity. In this chapter, you will learn how GDP is constructed, how it is used, and why it is so important.

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 131

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Introduction to the Macroeconomic Perspective In this chapter, you will learn about:

• Measuring the Size of the Economy: Gross Domestic Product

• Adjusting Nominal Values to Real Values

• Tracking Real GDP over Time

• Comparing GDP among Countries

• How Well GDP Measures the Well-Being of Society

Macroeconomics focuses on the economy as a whole (or on whole economies as they interact). What causes recessions? What makes unemployment stay high when recessions are supposed to be over? Why do some countries grow faster than others? Why do some countries have higher standards of living than others? These are all questions that macroeconomics addresses. Macroeconomics involves adding up the economic activity of all households and all businesses in all markets to get the overall demand and supply in the economy. However, when we do that, something curious happens. It is not unusual that what results at the macro level is different from the sum of the microeconomic parts. Indeed, what seems sensible from a microeconomic point of view can have unexpected or counterproductive results at the macroeconomic level. Imagine that you are sitting at an event with a large audience, like a live concert or a basketball game. A few people decide that they want a better view, and so they stand up. However, when these people stand up, they block the view for other people, and the others need to stand up as well if they wish to see. Eventually, nearly everyone is standing up, and as a result, no one can see much better than before. The rational decision of some individuals at the micro level—to stand up for a better view—ended up being self-defeating at the macro level. This is not macroeconomics, but it is an apt analogy.

Macroeconomics is a rather massive subject. How are we going to tackle it? Figure 6.2 illustrates the structure we will use. We will study macroeconomics from three different perspectives:

1. What are the macroeconomic goals? (Macroeconomics as a discipline does not have goals, but we do have goals for the macro economy.)

2. What are the frameworks economists can use to analyze the macroeconomy?

3. Finally, what are the policy tools governments can use to manage the macroeconomy?

Figure 6.2 Macroeconomic Goals, Framework, and Policies This chart shows what macroeconomics is about. The box on the left indicates a consensus of what are the most important goals for the macro economy, the middle box lists the frameworks economists use to analyze macroeconomic changes (such as inflation or recession), and the box on the right indicates the two tools the federal government uses to influence the macro economy.

Goals

In thinking about the overall health of the macroeconomy, it is useful to consider three primary goals: economic growth, low unemployment, and low inflation.

• Economic growth ultimately determines the prevailing standard of living in a country. Economic growth is measured by the percentage change in real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product. A growth rate of more than 3% is considered good.

• Unemployment, as measured by the unemployment rate, is the percentage of people in the labor force who do not have a job. When people lack jobs, the economy is wasting a precious resource-labor, and the result is

132 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

lower goods and services produced. Unemployment, however, is more than a statistic—it represents people’s livelihoods. While measured unemployment is unlikely to ever be zero, a measured unemployment rate of 5% or less is considered low (good).

• Inflation is a sustained increase in the overall level of prices, and is measured by the consumer price index. If many people face a situation where the prices that they pay for food, shelter, and healthcare are rising much faster than the wages they receive for their labor, there will be widespread unhappiness as their standard of living declines. For that reason, low inflation—an inflation rate of 1–2%—is a major goal.

Frameworks

As you learn in the micro part of this book, principal tools used by economists are theories and models (see Welcome to Economics! for more on this). In microeconomics, we used the theories of supply and demand; in macroeconomics, we use the theories of aggregate demand (AD) and aggregate supply (AS). This book presents two perspectives on macroeconomics: the Neoclassical perspective and the Keynesian perspective, each of which has its own version of AD and AS. Between the two perspectives, you will obtain a good understanding of what drives the macroeconomy.

Policy Tools

National governments have two tools for influencing the macroeconomy. The first is monetary policy, which involves managing the money supply and interest rates. The second is fiscal policy, which involves changes in government spending/purchases and taxes.

Each of the items in Figure 6.2 will be explained in detail in one or more other chapters. As you learn these things, you will discover that the goals and the policy tools are in the news almost every day.

6.1 | Measuring the Size of the Economy: Gross Domestic Product By the end of this section, you will be able to:

• Identify the components of GDP on the demand side and on the supply side • Evaluate how gross domestic product (GDP) is measured • Contrast and calculate GDP, net exports, and net national product

Macroeconomics is an empirical subject, so the first step toward understanding it is to measure the economy.

How large is the U.S. economy? The size of a nation’s overall economy is typically measured by its gross domestic product (GDP), which is the value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given year. The measurement of GDP involves counting up the production of millions of different goods and services—smart phones, cars, music downloads, computers, steel, bananas, college educations, and all other new goods and services produced in the current year—and summing them into a total dollar value. This task is straightforward: take the quantity of everything produced, multiply it by the price at which each product sold, and add up the total. In 2014, the U.S. GDP totaled $17.4 trillion, the largest GDP in the world.

Each of the market transactions that enter into GDP must involve both a buyer and a seller. The GDP of an economy can be measured either by the total dollar value of what is purchased in the economy, or by the total dollar value of what is produced. There is even a third way, as we will explain later.

GDP Measured by Components of Demand Who buys all of this production? This demand can be divided into four main parts: consumer spending (consumption), business spending (investment), government spending on goods and services, and spending on net exports. (See the following Clear It Up feature to understand what is meant by investment.) Table 6.1 shows how these four components added up to the GDP in 2014. Figure 6.4 (a) shows the levels of consumption, investment, and government purchases over time, expressed as a percentage of GDP, while Figure 6.4 (b) shows the levels of exports and imports as a percentage of GDP over time. A few patterns about each of these components are worth noticing. Table 6.1 shows the components of GDP from the demand side. Figure 6.3 provides a visual of the percentages.

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 133

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Components of GDP on the Demand Side (in trillions of dollars)

Percentage of Total

Consumption $11.9 68.4%

Investment $2.9 16.7%

Government $3.2 18.4%

Exports $2.3 13.2%

Imports –$2.9 –16.7%

Total GDP $17.4 100%

Table 6.1 Components of U.S. GDP in 2014: From the Demand Side (Source: http://bea.gov/iTable/ index_nipa.cfm)

Figure 6.3 Percentage of Components of U.S. GDP on the Demand Side Consumption makes up over half of the demand side components of the GDP. (Source: http://bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm)

What is meant by the word “investment”? What do economists mean by investment, or business spending? In calculating GDP, investment does not refer to the purchase of stocks and bonds or the trading of financial assets. It refers to the purchase of new capital goods, that is, new commercial real estate (such as buildings, factories, and stores) and equipment, residential housing construction, and inventories. Inventories that are produced this year are included in this year’s GDP—even if they have not yet sold. From the accountant’s perspective, it is as if the firm invested in its own inventories. Business investment in 2014 was almost $3 trillion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

134 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Figure 6.4 Components of GDP on the Demand Side (a) Consumption is about two-thirds of GDP, but it moves relatively little over time. Business investment hovers around 15% of GDP, but it increases and declines more than consumption. Government spending on goods and services is around 20% of GDP. (b) Exports are added to total demand for goods and services, while imports are subtracted from total demand. If exports exceed imports, as in most of the 1960s and 1970s in the U.S. economy, a trade surplus exists. If imports exceed exports, as in recent years, then a trade deficit exists. (Source: http://bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm)

Consumption expenditure by households is the largest component of GDP, accounting for about two-thirds of the GDP in any year. This tells us that consumers’ spending decisions are a major driver of the economy. However, consumer spending is a gentle elephant: when viewed over time, it does not jump around too much.

Investment expenditure refers to purchases of physical plant and equipment, primarily by businesses. If Starbucks builds a new store, or Amazon buys robots, these expenditures are counted under business investment. Investment demand is far smaller than consumption demand, typically accounting for only about 15–18% of GDP, but it is very important for the economy because this is where jobs are created. However, it fluctuates more noticeably than consumption. Business investment is volatile; new technology or a new product can spur business investment, but then confidence can drop and business investment can pull back sharply.

If you have noticed any of the infrastructure projects (new bridges, highways, airports) launched during the recession of 2009, you have seen how important government spending can be for the economy. Government expenditure in the United States is about 20% of GDP, and includes spending by all three levels of government: federal, state, and local. The only part of government spending counted in demand is government purchases of goods or services produced in the economy. Examples include the government buying a new fighter jet for the Air Force (federal government spending), building a new highway (state government spending), or a new school (local government spending). A significant portion of government budgets are transfer payments, like unemployment benefits, veteran’s benefits, and Social Security payments to retirees. These payments are excluded from GDP because the government does not receive a new good or service in return or exchange. Instead they are transfers of income from taxpayers to others. If you are curious about the awesome undertaking of adding up GDP, read the following Clear It Up feature.

How do statisticians measure GDP? Government economists at the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), within the U.S. Department of Commerce, piece together estimates of GDP from a variety of sources.

Once every five years, in the second and seventh year of each decade, the Bureau of the Census carries out a detailed census of businesses throughout the United States. In between, the Census Bureau carries

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 135

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

out a monthly survey of retail sales. These figures are adjusted with foreign trade data to account for exports that are produced in the United States and sold abroad and for imports that are produced abroad and sold here. Once every ten years, the Census Bureau conducts a comprehensive survey of housing and residential finance. Together, these sources provide the main basis for figuring out what is produced for consumers.

For investment, the Census Bureau carries out a monthly survey of construction and an annual survey of expenditures on physical capital equipment.

For what is purchased by the federal government, the statisticians rely on the U.S. Department of the Treasury. An annual Census of Governments gathers information on state and local governments. Because a lot of government spending at all levels involves hiring people to provide services, a large portion of government spending is also tracked through payroll records collected by state governments and by the Social Security Administration.

With regard to foreign trade, the Census Bureau compiles a monthly record of all import and export documents. Additional surveys cover transportation and travel, and adjustment is made for financial services that are produced in the United States for foreign customers.

Many other sources contribute to the estimates of GDP. Information on energy comes from the U.S. Department of Transportation and Department of Energy. Information on healthcare is collected by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Surveys of landlords find out about rental income. The Department of Agriculture collects statistics on farming.

All of these bits and pieces of information arrive in different forms, at different time intervals. The BEA melds them together to produce estimates of GDP on a quarterly basis (every three months). These numbers are then “annualized” by multiplying by four. As more information comes in, these estimates are updated and revised. The “advance” estimate of GDP for a certain quarter is released one month after a quarter. The “preliminary” estimate comes out one month after that. The “final” estimate is published one month later, but it is not actually final. In July, roughly updated estimates for the previous calendar year are released. Then, once every five years, after the results of the latest detailed five-year business census have been processed, the BEA revises all of the past estimates of GDP according to the newest methods and data, going all the way back to 1929.

Visit this website (http://openstaxcollege.org/l/beafaq) to read FAQs on the BEA site. You can even email your own questions!

When thinking about the demand for domestically produced goods in a global economy, it is important to count spending on exports—domestically produced goods that are sold abroad. By the same token, we must also subtract spending on imports—goods produced in other countries that are purchased by residents of this country. The net export component of GDP is equal to the dollar value of exports (X) minus the dollar value of imports (M), (X – M). The gap between exports and imports is called the trade balance. If a country’s exports are larger than its imports, then a country is said to have a trade surplus. In the United States, exports typically exceeded imports in the 1960s and 1970s, as shown in Figure 6.4 (b).

Since the early 1980s, imports have typically exceeded exports, and so the United States has experienced a trade deficit in most years. Indeed, the trade deficit grew quite large in the late 1990s and in the mid-2000s. Figure 6.4 (b)

136 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

also shows that imports and exports have both risen substantially in recent decades, even after the declines during the Great Recession between 2008 and 2009. As noted before, if exports and imports are equal, foreign trade has no effect on total GDP. However, even if exports and imports are balanced overall, foreign trade might still have powerful effects on particular industries and workers by causing nations to shift workers and physical capital investment toward one industry rather than another.

Based on these four components of demand, GDP can be measured as:

GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government + Trade balance GDP = C + I + G + (X – M)

Understanding how to measure GDP is important for analyzing connections in the macro economy and for thinking about macroeconomic policy tools.

GDP Measured by What is Produced Everything that is purchased must be produced first. Table 6.2 breaks down what is produced into five categories: durable goods, nondurable goods, services, structures, and the change in inventories. Before going into detail about these categories, notice that total GDP measured according to what is produced is exactly the same as the GDP measured by looking at the five components of demand. Figure 6.5 provides a visual representation of this information.

Components of GDP on the Supply Side (in trillions of dollars)

Percentage of Total

Goods

Durable goods $2.9 16.7%

Nondurable goods $2.3 13.2%

Services $10.8 62.1%

Structures $1.3 7.4%

Change in inventories

$0.1 0.6%

Total GDP $17.4 100%

Table 6.2 Components of U.S. GDP on the Production Side, 2014 (Source: http://bea.gov/iTable/ index_nipa.cfm)

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 137

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Figure 6.5 Percentage of Components of GDP on the Production Side Services make up over half of the production side components of GDP in the United States.

Since every market transaction must have both a buyer and a seller, GDP must be the same whether measured by what is demanded or by what is produced. Figure 6.6 shows these components of what is produced, expressed as a percentage of GDP, since 1960.

Figure 6.6 Types of Production Services are the largest single component of total supply, representing over half of GDP. Nondurable goods used to be larger than durable goods, but in recent years, nondurable goods have been dropping closer to durable goods, which is about 20% of GDP. Structures hover around 10% of GDP. The change in inventories, the final component of aggregate supply, is not shown here; it is typically less than 1% of GDP.

138 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

In thinking about what is produced in the economy, many non-economists immediately focus on solid, long-lasting goods, like cars and computers. By far the largest part of GDP, however, is services. Moreover, services have been a growing share of GDP over time. A detailed breakdown of the leading service industries would include healthcare, education, and legal and financial services. It has been decades since most of the U.S. economy involved making solid objects. Instead, the most common jobs in a modern economy involve a worker looking at pieces of paper or a computer screen; meeting with co-workers, customers, or suppliers; or making phone calls.

Even within the overall category of goods, long-lasting durable goods like cars and refrigerators are about the same share of the economy as short-lived nondurable goods like food and clothing. The category of structures includes everything from homes, to office buildings, shopping malls, and factories. Inventories is a small category that refers to the goods that have been produced by one business but have not yet been sold to consumers, and are still sitting in warehouses and on shelves. The amount of inventories sitting on shelves tends to decline if business is better than expected, or to rise if business is worse than expected.

The Problem of Double Counting GDP is defined as the current value of all final goods and services produced in a nation in a year. What are final goods? They are goods at the furthest stage of production at the end of a year. Statisticians who calculate GDP must avoid the mistake of double counting, in which output is counted more than once as it travels through the stages of production. For example, imagine what would happen if government statisticians first counted the value of tires produced by a tire manufacturer, and then counted the value of a new truck sold by an automaker that contains those tires. In this example, the value of the tires would have been counted twice-because the price of the truck includes the value of the tires.

To avoid this problem, which would overstate the size of the economy considerably, government statisticians count just the value of final goods and services in the chain of production that are sold for consumption, investment, government, and trade purposes. Intermediate goods, which are goods that go into the production of other goods, are excluded from GDP calculations. From the example above, only the value of the Ford truck will be counted. The value of what businesses provide to other businesses is captured in the final products at the end of the production chain.

The concept of GDP is fairly straightforward: it is just the dollar value of all final goods and services produced in the economy in a year. In our decentralized, market-oriented economy, actually calculating the more than $16 trillion- dollar U.S. GDP—along with how it is changing every few months—is a full-time job for a brigade of government statisticians.

What is Counted in GDP What is not included in GDP

Consumption Intermediate goods

Business investment Transfer payments and non-market activities

Government spending on goods and services Used goods

Net exports Illegal goods

Table 6.3 Counting GDP

Notice the items that are not counted into GDP, as outlined in Table 6.3. The sales of used goods are not included because they were produced in a previous year and are part of that year’s GDP. The entire underground economy of services paid “under the table” and illegal sales should be counted, but is not, because it is impossible to track these sales. In a recent study by Friedrich Schneider of shadow economies, the underground economy in the United States was estimated to be 6.6% of GDP, or close to $2 trillion dollars in 2013 alone. Transfer payments, such as payment by the government to individuals, are not included, because they do not represent production. Also, production of some goods—such as home production as when you make your breakfast—is not counted because these goods are not sold in the marketplace.

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 139

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Visit this website (http://openstaxcollege.org/l/undergroundecon) to read about the “New Underground Economy.”

Other Ways to Measure the Economy Besides GDP, there are several different but closely related ways of measuring the size of the economy. We mentioned above that GDP can be thought of as total production and as total purchases. It can also be thought of as total income since anything produced and sold produces income.

One of the closest cousins of GDP is the gross national product (GNP). GDP includes only what is produced within a country’s borders. GNP adds what is produced by domestic businesses and labor abroad, and subtracts out any payments sent home to other countries by foreign labor and businesses located in the United States. In other words, GNP is based more on the production of citizens and firms of a country, wherever they are located, and GDP is based on what happens within the geographic boundaries of a certain country. For the United States, the gap between GDP and GNP is relatively small; in recent years, only about 0.2%. For small nations, which may have a substantial share of their population working abroad and sending money back home, the difference can be substantial.

Net national product (NNP) is calculated by taking GNP and then subtracting the value of how much physical capital is worn out, or reduced in value because of aging, over the course of a year. The process by which capital ages and loses value is called depreciation. The NNP can be further subdivided into national income, which includes all income to businesses and individuals, and personal income, which includes only income to people.

For practical purposes, it is not vital to memorize these definitions. However, it is important to be aware that these differences exist and to know what statistic you are looking at, so that you do not accidentally compare, say, GDP in one year or for one country with GNP or NNP in another year or another country. To get an idea of how these calculations work, follow the steps in the following Work It Out feature.

140 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Calculating GDP, Net Exports, and NNP Based on the information in Table 6.4:

a. What is the value of GDP?

b. What is the value of net exports?

c. What is the value of NNP?

Government purchases $120 billion

Depreciation $40 billion

Consumption $400 billion

Business Investment $60 billion

Exports $100 billion

Imports $120 billion

Income receipts from rest of the world $10 billion

Income payments to rest of the world $8 billion

Table 6.4

Step 1. To calculate GDP use the following formula:

GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government spending + (Exports – Imports) = C + I + G + (X – M) = $400 + $60 + $120 + ($100 – $120) = $560 billion

Step 2. To calculate net exports, subtract imports from exports.

Net exports = X – M = $100 – $120 = –$20 billion

Step 3. To calculate NNP, use the following formula:

NNP = GDP + Income receipts from the rest of the world – Income payments to the rest of the world – Depreciation

= $560 + $10 – $8 – $40 = $522 billion

6.2 | Adjusting Nominal Values to Real Values By the end of this section, you will be able to:

• Contrast nominal GDP and real GDP • Explain GDP deflator • Calculate real GDP based on nominal GDP values

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 141

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

When examining economic statistics, there is a crucial distinction worth emphasizing. The distinction is between nominal and real measurements, which refer to whether or not inflation has distorted a given statistic. Looking at economic statistics without considering inflation is like looking through a pair of binoculars and trying to guess how close something is: unless you know how strong the lenses are, you cannot guess the distance very accurately. Similarly, if you do not know the rate of inflation, it is difficult to figure out if a rise in GDP is due mainly to a rise in the overall level of prices or to a rise in quantities of goods produced. The nominal value of any economic statistic means the statistic is measured in terms of actual prices that exist at the time. The real value refers to the same statistic after it has been adjusted for inflation. Generally, it is the real value that is more important.

Converting Nominal to Real GDP Table 6.5 shows U.S. GDP at five-year intervals since 1960 in nominal dollars; that is, GDP measured using the actual market prices prevailing in each stated year. This data is also reflected in the graph shown in Figure 6.7

Year Nominal GDP (billions of dollars) GDP Deflator (2005 = 100)

1960 543.3 19.0

1965 743.7 20.3

1970 1,075.9 24.8

1975 1,688.9 34.1

1980 2,862.5 48.3

1985 4,346.7 62.3

1990 5,979.6 72.7

1995 7,664.0 81.7

2000 10,289.7 89.0

2005 13,095.4 100.0

2010 14,958.3 110.0

Table 6.5 U.S. Nominal GDP and the GDP Deflator (Source: www.bea.gov)

Figure 6.7 U.S. Nominal GDP, 1960–2010 Nominal GDP values have risen exponentially from 1960 through 2010, according to the BEA.

142 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

If an unwary analyst compared nominal GDP in 1960 to nominal GDP in 2010, it might appear that national output had risen by a factor of twenty-seven over this time (that is, GDP of $14,958 billion in 2010 divided by GDP of $543 billion in 1960). This conclusion would be highly misleading. Recall that nominal GDP is defined as the quantity of every good or service produced multiplied by the price at which it was sold, summed up for all goods and services. In order to see how much production has actually increased, we need to extract the effects of higher prices on nominal GDP. This can be easily done, using the GDP deflator.

GDP deflator is a price index measuring the average prices of all goods and services included in the economy. We explore price indices in detail and how they are computed in Inflation, but this definition will do in the context of this chapter. The data for the GDP deflator are given in Table 6.5 and shown graphically in Figure 6.8.

Figure 6.8 U.S. GDP Deflator, 1960–2010 Much like nominal GDP, the GDP deflator has risen exponentially from 1960 through 2010. (Source: BEA)

Figure 6.8 shows that the price level has risen dramatically since 1960. The price level in 2010 was almost six times higher than in 1960 (the deflator for 2010 was 110 versus a level of 19 in 1960). Clearly, much of the apparent growth in nominal GDP was due to inflation, not an actual change in the quantity of goods and services produced, in other words, not in real GDP. Recall that nominal GDP can rise for two reasons: an increase in output, and/or an increase in prices. What is needed is to extract the increase in prices from nominal GDP so as to measure only changes in output. After all, the dollars used to measure nominal GDP in 1960 are worth more than the inflated dollars of 1990—and the price index tells exactly how much more. This adjustment is easy to do if you understand that nominal measurements are in value terms, where

Value = Price × Quantity or

Nominal GDP = GDP Defla or × Real GDP

Let’s look at an example at the micro level. Suppose the t-shirt company, Coolshirts, sells 10 t-shirts at a price of $9 each.

Coolshirt's nominal revenue from sales = Price × Quantity = $9 × 10 = $90

Then,

Coolshirt's real income = Nominal revenuePrice

= $90 $9

= 10

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 143

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

In other words, when we compute “real” measurements we are trying to get at actual quantities, in this case, 10 t- shirts.

With GDP, it is just a tiny bit more complicated. We start with the same formula as above:

Real GDP = Nominal GDPPrice Index

For reasons that will be explained in more detail below, mathematically, a price index is a two-digit decimal number like 1.00 or 0.85 or 1.25. Because some people have trouble working with decimals, when the price index is published, it has traditionally been multiplied by 100 to get integer numbers like 100, 85, or 125. What this means is that when we “deflate” nominal figures to get real figures (by dividing the nominal by the price index). We also need to remember to divide the published price index by 100 to make the math work. So the formula becomes:

Real GDP = Nominal GDPPrice Index / 100

Now read the following Work It Out feature for more practice calculating real GDP.

144 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Computing GDP It is possible to use the data in Table 6.5 to compute real GDP.

Step 1. Look at Table 6.5, to see that, in 1960, nominal GDP was $543.3 billion and the price index (GDP deflator) was 19.0.

Step 2. To calculate the real GDP in 1960, use the formula:

Real GDP = Nominal GDPPrice Index / 100

= $543.3 billion19 / 100 = $2,859.5 billion

We’ll do this in two parts to make it clear. First adjust the price index: 19 divided by 100 = 0.19. Then divide into nominal GDP: $543.3 billion / 0.19 = $2,859.5 billion.

Step 3. Use the same formula to calculate the real GDP in 1965.

Real GDP = Nominal GDPPrice Index / 100

= $743.7 billion20.3 / 100 = $3,663.5 billion

Step 4. Continue using this formula to calculate all of the real GDP values from 1960 through 2010. The calculations and the results are shown in Table 6.6.

Year Nominal GDP(billions of dollars) GDP Deflator (2005 = 100) Calculations

Real GDP (billions of 2005 dollars)

1960 543.3 19.0 543.3 / (19.0/100)

2859.5

1965 743.7 20.3 743.7 / (20.3/100)

3663.5

1970 1075.9 24.8 1,075.9 / (24.8/100)

4338.3

1975 1688.9 34.1 1,688.9 / (34.1/100)

4952.8

1980 2862.5 48.3 2,862.5 / (48.3/100)

5926.5

1985 4346.7 62.3 4,346.7 / (62.3/100)

6977.0

1990 5979.6 72.7 5,979.6 / (72.7/100)

8225.0

Table 6.6 Converting Nominal to Real GDP (Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, www.bea.gov)

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 145

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Year Nominal GDP(billions of dollars) GDP Deflator (2005 = 100) Calculations

Real GDP (billions of 2005 dollars)

1995 7664.0 82.0 7,664 / (82.0/100)

9346.3

2000 10289.7 89.0 10,289.7 / (89.0/100)

11561.5

2005 13095.4 100.0 13,095.4 / (100.0/100)

13095.4

2010 14958.3 110.0 14,958.3 / (110.0/100)

13598.5

Table 6.6 Converting Nominal to Real GDP (Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, www.bea.gov)

There are a couple things to notice here. Whenever you compute a real statistic, one year (or period) plays a special role. It is called the base year (or base period). The base year is the year whose prices are used to compute the real statistic. When we calculate real GDP, for example, we take the quantities of goods and services produced in each year (for example, 1960 or 1973) and multiply them by their prices in the base year (in this case, 2005), so we get a measure of GDP that uses prices that do not change from year to year. That is why real GDP is labeled “Constant Dollars” or “2005 Dollars,” which means that real GDP is constructed using prices that existed in 2005. The formula used is:

GDP defla or = Nominal GDPReal GDP × 100

Rearranging the formula and using the data from 2005:

Real GDP = Nominal GDPPrice Index / 100

= $13,095.4 billion100 / 100 = $13,095.4 billion

Comparing real GDP and nominal GDP for 2005, you see they are the same. This is no accident. It is because 2005 has been chosen as the “base year” in this example. Since the price index in the base year always has a value of 100 (by definition), nominal and real GDP are always the same in the base year.

Look at the data for 2010.

Real GDP = Nominal GDPPrice Index / 100

= $14,958.3 billion110 / 100 = $13,598.5 billion

Use this data to make another observation: As long as inflation is positive, meaning prices increase on average from year to year, real GDP should be less than nominal GDP in any year after the base year. The reason for this should be clear: The value of nominal GDP is “inflated” by inflation. Similarly, as long as inflation is positive, real GDP should be greater than nominal GDP in any year before the base year.

Figure 6.9 shows the U.S. nominal and real GDP since 1960. Because 2005 is the base year, the nominal and real values are exactly the same in that year. However, over time, the rise in nominal GDP looks much larger than the rise in real GDP (that is, the nominal GDP line rises more steeply than the real GDP line), because the rise in nominal GDP is exaggerated by the presence of inflation, especially in the 1970s.

146 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Figure 6.9 U.S. Nominal and Real GDP, 1960–2012 The red line measures U.S. GDP in nominal dollars. The black line measures U.S. GDP in real dollars, where all dollar values have been converted to 2005 dollars. Since real GDP is expressed in 2005 dollars, the two lines cross in 2005. However, real GDP will appear higher than nominal GDP in the years before 2005, because dollars were worth less in 2005 than in previous years. Conversely, real GDP will appear lower in the years after 2005, because dollars were worth more in 2005 than in later years.

Let’s return to the question posed originally: How much did GDP increase in real terms? What was the rate of growth of real GDP from 1960 to 2010? To find the real growth rate, we apply the formula for percentage change:

2010 real GDP – 1960 real GDP 1960 real GDP × 100 = % change

13,598.5 – 2,859.5 2,859.5 × 100 = 376%

In other words, the U.S. economy has increased real production of goods and services by nearly a factor of four since 1960. Of course, that understates the material improvement since it fails to capture improvements in the quality of products and the invention of new products.

There is a quicker way to answer this question approximately, using another math trick. Because:

Real GDP = Price × Quantity % change in real GDP = % change in price + % change in quantity

OR % change in quantity = % change in real GDP – % change in price

Therefore, the growth rate of real GDP (% change in quantity) equals the growth rate in nominal GDP (% change in value) minus the inflation rate (% change in price).

Note that using this equation provides an approximation for small changes in the levels. For more accurate measures, one should use the first formula shown.

6.3 | Tracking Real GDP over Time By the end of this section, you will be able to:

• Explain recessions, depressions, peaks, and troughs • Evaluate the importance of tracking real GDP over time • Analyze the impact of economic fluctuations on a country’s output and price level

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 147

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

When news reports indicate that “the economy grew 1.2% in the first quarter,” the reports are referring to the percentage change in real GDP. By convention, GDP growth is reported at an annualized rate: Whatever the calculated growth in real GDP was for the quarter, it is multiplied by four when it is reported as if the economy were growing at that rate for a full year.

Figure 6.10 U.S. GDP, 1900–2014 Real GDP in the United States in 2014 was about $16 trillion. After adjusting to remove the effects of inflation, this represents a roughly 20-fold increase in the economy’s production of goods and services since the start of the twentieth century. (Source: bea.gov)

Figure 6.10 shows the pattern of U.S. real GDP since 1900. The generally upward long-term path of GDP has been regularly interrupted by short-term declines. A significant decline in real GDP is called a recession. An especially lengthy and deep recession is called a depression. The severe drop in GDP that occurred during the Great Depression of the 1930s is clearly visible in the figure, as is the Great Recession of 2008–2009.

Real GDP is important because it is highly correlated with other measures of economic activity, like employment and unemployment. When real GDP rises, so does employment.

The most significant human problem associated with recessions (and their larger, uglier cousins, depressions) is that a slowdown in production means that firms need to lay off or fire some of the workers they have. Losing a job imposes painful financial and personal costs on workers, and often on their extended families as well. In addition, even those who keep their jobs are likely to find that wage raises are scanty at best—or they may even be asked to take pay cuts.

Table 6.7 lists the pattern of recessions and expansions in the U.S. economy since 1900. The highest point of the economy, before the recession begins, is called the peak; conversely, the lowest point of a recession, before a recovery begins, is called the trough. Thus, a recession lasts from peak to trough, and an economic upswing runs from trough to peak. The movement of the economy from peak to trough and trough to peak is called the business cycle. It is intriguing to notice that the three longest trough-to-peak expansions of the twentieth century have happened since 1960. The most recent recession started in December 2007 and ended formally in June 2009. This was the most severe recession since the Great Depression of the 1930’s.

Trough Peak Months of Contraction Months of Expansion

December 1900 September 1902 18 21

August 1904 May 1907 23 33

June 1908 January 1910 13 19

January 1912 January 1913 24 12

December 1914 August 1918 23 44

March 1919 January 1920 7 10

July 1921 May 1923 18 22

July 1924 October 1926 14 27

Table 6.7 U.S. Business Cycles since 1900 (Source: http://www.nber.org/cycles/main.html)

148 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Trough Peak Months of Contraction Months of Expansion

November 1927 August 1929 23 21

March 1933 May 1937 43 50

June 1938 February 1945 13 80

October 1945 November 1948 8 37

October 1949 July 1953 11 45

May 1954 August 1957 10 39

April 1958 April 1960 8 24

February 1961 December 1969 10 106

November 1970 November 1973 11 36

March 1975 January 1980 16 58

July 1980 July 1981 6 12

November 1982 July 1990 16 92

March 2001 November 2001 8 120

December 2007 June 2009 18 73

Table 6.7 U.S. Business Cycles since 1900 (Source: http://www.nber.org/cycles/main.html)

A private think tank, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), is the official tracker of business cycles for the U.S. economy. However, the effects of a severe recession often linger on after the official ending date assigned by the NBER.

6.4 | Comparing GDP among Countries By the end of this section, you will be able to:

• Explain how GDP can be used to compare the economic welfare of different nations • Calculate the conversion of GDP to a common currency by using exchange rates • Calculate GDP per capita using population data

It is common to use GDP as a measure of economic welfare or standard of living in a nation. When comparing the GDP of different nations for this purpose, two issues immediately arise. First, the GDP of a country is measured in its own currency: the United States uses the U.S. dollar; Canada, the Canadian dollar; most countries of Western Europe, the euro; Japan, the yen; Mexico, the peso; and so on. Thus, comparing GDP between two countries requires converting to a common currency. A second issue is that countries have very different numbers of people. For instance, the United States has a much larger economy than Mexico or Canada, but it also has roughly three times as many people as Mexico and nine times as many people as Canada. So, if we are trying to compare standards of living across countries, we need to divide GDP by population.

Converting Currencies with Exchange Rates To compare the GDP of countries with different currencies, it is necessary to convert to a “common denominator” using an exchange rate, which is the value of one currency in terms of another currency. Exchange rates are expressed either as the units of country A’s currency that need to be traded for a single unit of country B’s currency (for example, Japanese yen per British pound), or as the inverse (for example, British pounds per Japanese yen). Two

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 149

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

types of exchange rates can be used for this purpose, market exchange rates and purchasing power parity (PPP) equivalent exchange rates. Market exchange rates vary on a day-to-day basis depending on supply and demand in foreign exchange markets. PPP-equivalent exchange rates provide a longer run measure of the exchange rate. For this reason, PPP-equivalent exchange rates are typically used for cross country comparisons of GDP. Exchange rates will be discussed in more detail in Exchange Rates and International Capital Flows. The following Work It Out feature explains how to convert GDP to a common currency.

Converting GDP to a Common Currency Using the exchange rate to convert GDP from one currency to another is straightforward. Say that the task is to compare Brazil’s GDP in 2013 of 4.8 trillion reals with the U.S. GDP of $16.6 trillion for the same year.

Step 1. Determine the exchange rate for the specified year. In 2013, the exchange rate was 2.230 reals = $1. (These numbers are realistic, but rounded off to simplify the calculations.)

Step 2. Convert Brazil’s GDP into U.S. dollars:

Brazil's GDP in $ U.S. = Brazil's GDP in reals Exchange rate (reals/$ U.S.)

= 4.8 trillion reals 2.230 reals per $ U.S.

= $2.2 trillion

Step 3. Compare this value to the GDP in the United States in the same year. The U.S. GDP was $16.6 trillion in 2013, which is nearly eight times that of GDP in Brazil in 2012.

Step 4. View Table 6.8 which shows the size of and variety of GDPs of different countries in 2013, all expressed in U.S. dollars. Each is calculated using the process explained above.

Country GDP in Billions ofDomestic Currency Domestic Currency/U.S. Dollars (PPP Equivalent)

GDP (in billions of U.S. dollars)

Brazil 4,844.80 reals 2.157 2,246.00

Canada 1,881.20 dollars 1.030 1,826.80

China 58,667.30 yuan 6.196 9,469.10

Egypt 1,753.30 pounds 6.460 271.40

Germany 2,737.60 euros 0.753 3,636.00

India 113,550.70 rupees 60.502 1,876.80

Japan 478,075.30 yen 97.596 4,898.50

Mexico 16,104.40 pesos 12.772 1,260.90

South Korea

1,428,294.70 won 1,094.925 1,304.467

United Kingdom

1,612.80 pounds 0.639 2,523.20

Table 6.8 Comparing GDPs Across Countries, 2013 (Source: http://www.imf.org/external/ pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/weodata/index.aspx)

150 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Country GDP in Billions ofDomestic Currency Domestic Currency/U.S. Dollars (PPP Equivalent)

GDP (in billions of U.S. dollars)

United States

16,768.10 dollars 1.000 16,768.10

Table 6.8 Comparing GDPs Across Countries, 2013 (Source: http://www.imf.org/external/ pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/weodata/index.aspx)

GDP Per Capita The U.S. economy has the largest GDP in the world, by a considerable amount. The United States is also a populous country; in fact, it is the third largest country by population in the world, although well behind China and India. So is the U.S. economy larger than other countries just because the United States has more people than most other countries, or because the U.S. economy is actually larger on a per-person basis? This question can be answered by calculating a country’s GDP per capita; that is, the GDP divided by the population.

GDP per capita = GDP/population

The second column of Table 6.9 lists the GDP of the same selection of countries that appeared in the previous Tracking Real GDP over Time and Table 6.8, showing their GDP as converted into U.S. dollars (which is the same as the last column of the previous table). The third column gives the population for each country. The fourth column lists the GDP per capita. GDP per capita is obtained in two steps: First, by dividing column two (GDP, in billions of dollars) by 1000 so it has the same units as column three (Population, in millions). Then dividing the result (GDP in millions of dollars) by column three (Population, in millions).

Country GDP (in billions of U.S.dollars) Population (in

millions) Per Capita GDP (in U.S.

dollars)

Brazil 2,246.00 199.20 11,172.50

Canada 1,826.80 35.10 52,037.10

China 9,469.10 1,360.80 6,958.70

Egypt 271.40 83.70 3,242.90

Germany 3,636.00 80.80 44,999.50

India 1,876.80 1,243.30 1,509.50

Japan 4,898.50 127.3 38,467.80

Mexico 1,260.90 118.40 10,649.90

South Korea 1,304.47 50.20 25,975.10

United Kingdom

2,523.20 64.10 39,371.70

United States

16,768.10 316.30 53,001.00

Table 6.9 GDP Per Capita, 2013 (Source: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/weodata/ index.aspx)

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 151

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

Notice that the ranking by GDP is different from the ranking by GDP per capita. India has a somewhat larger GDP than Germany, but on a per capita basis, Germany has more than 10 times India’s standard of living. Will China soon have a better standard of living than the U.S.? Read the following Clear It Up feature to find out.

Is China going to surpass the United States in terms of standard of living? As shown in Table 6.9, China has the second largest GDP of the countries: $9.5 trillion compared to the United States’ $16.8 trillion. Perhaps it will surpass the United States, but probably not any time soon. China has a much larger population so that in per capita terms, its GDP is less than one fifth that of the United States ($6,958.70 compared to $53,001). The Chinese people are still quite poor relative to the United States and other developed countries. One caveat: For reasons to be discussed shortly, GDP per capita can give us only a rough idea of the differences in living standards across countries.

The high-income nations of the world—including the United States, Canada, the Western European countries, and Japan—typically have GDP per capita in the range of $20,000 to $50,000. Middle-income countries, which include much of Latin America, Eastern Europe, and some countries in East Asia, have GDP per capita in the range of $6,000 to $12,000. The low-income countries in the world, many of them located in Africa and Asia, often have GDP per capita of less than $2,000 per year.

6.5 | How Well GDP Measures the Well-Being of Society By the end of this section, you will be able to:

• Discuss how productivity influences the standard of living • Explain the limitations of GDP as a measure of the standard of living • Analyze the relationship between GDP data and fluctuations in the standard of living

The level of GDP per capita clearly captures some of what we mean by the phrase “standard of living.” Most of the migration in the world, for example, involves people who are moving from countries with relatively low GDP per capita to countries with relatively high GDP per capita.

“Standard of living” is a broader term than GDP. While GDP focuses on production that is bought and sold in markets, standard of living includes all elements that affect people’s well-being, whether they are bought and sold in the market or not. To illuminate the gap between GDP and standard of living, it is useful to spell out some things that GDP does not cover that are clearly relevant to standard of living.

Limitations of GDP as a Measure of the Standard of Living While GDP includes spending on recreation and travel, it does not cover leisure time. Clearly, however, there is a substantial difference between an economy that is large because people work long hours, and an economy that is just as large because people are more productive with their time so they do not have to work as many hours. The GDP per capita of the U.S. economy is larger than the GDP per capita of Germany, as was shown in Table 6.9, but does that prove that the standard of living in the United States is higher? Not necessarily, since it is also true that the average U.S. worker works several hundred hours more per year more than the average German worker. The calculation of GDP does not take the German worker’s extra weeks of vacation into account.

While GDP includes what is spent on environmental protection, healthcare, and education, it does not include actual levels of environmental cleanliness, health, and learning. GDP includes the cost of buying pollution-control equipment, but it does not address whether the air and water are actually cleaner or dirtier. GDP includes spending on medical care, but does not address whether life expectancy or infant mortality have risen or fallen. Similarly, it

152 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

counts spending on education, but does not address directly how much of the population can read, write, or do basic mathematics.

GDP includes production that is exchanged in the market, but it does not cover production that is not exchanged in the market. For example, hiring someone to mow your lawn or clean your house is part of GDP, but doing these tasks yourself is not part of GDP. One remarkable change in the U.S. economy in recent decades is that, as of 1970, only about 42% of women participated in the paid labor force. By the second decade of the 2000s, nearly 60% of women participated in the paid labor force according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. As women are now in the labor force, many of the services they used to produce in the non-market economy like food preparation and child care have shifted to some extent into the market economy, which makes the GDP appear larger even if more services are not actually being consumed.

GDP has nothing to say about the level of inequality in society. GDP per capita is only an average. When GDP per capita rises by 5%, it could mean that GDP for everyone in the society has risen by 5%, or that of some groups has risen by more while that of others has risen by less—or even declined. GDP also has nothing in particular to say about the amount of variety available. If a family buys 100 loaves of bread in a year, GDP does not care whether they are all white bread, or whether the family can choose from wheat, rye, pumpernickel, and many others—it just looks at whether the total amount spent on bread is the same.

Likewise, GDP has nothing much to say about what technology and products are available. The standard of living in, for example, 1950 or 1900 was not affected only by how much money people had—it was also affected by what they could buy. No matter how much money you had in 1950, you could not buy an iPhone or a personal computer.

In certain cases, it is not clear that a rise in GDP is even a good thing. If a city is wrecked by a hurricane, and then experiences a surge of rebuilding construction activity, it would be peculiar to claim that the hurricane was therefore economically beneficial. If people are led by a rising fear of crime, to pay for installation of bars and burglar alarms on all their windows, it is hard to believe that this increase in GDP has made them better off. In that same vein, some people would argue that sales of certain goods, like pornography or extremely violent movies, do not represent a gain to society’s standard of living.

Does a Rise in GDP Overstate or Understate the Rise in the Standard of Living? The fact that GDP per capita does not fully capture the broader idea of standard of living has led to a concern that the increases in GDP over time are illusory. It is theoretically possible that while GDP is rising, the standard of living could be falling if human health, environmental cleanliness, and other factors that are not included in GDP are worsening. Fortunately, this fear appears to be overstated.

In some ways, the rise in GDP understates the actual rise in the standard of living. For example, the typical workweek for a U.S. worker has fallen over the last century from about 60 hours per week to less than 40 hours per week. Life expectancy and health have risen dramatically, and so has the average level of education. Since 1970, the air and water in the United States have generally been getting cleaner. New technologies have been developed for entertainment, travel, information, and health. A much wider variety of basic products like food and clothing is available today than several decades ago. Because GDP does not capture leisure, health, a cleaner environment, the possibilities created by new technology, or an increase in variety, the actual rise in the standard of living for Americans in recent decades has exceeded the rise in GDP.

On the other side, rates of crime, levels of traffic congestion, and inequality of incomes are higher in the United States now than they were in the 1960s. Moreover, a substantial number of services that used to be provided, primarily by women, in the non-market economy are now part of the market economy that is counted by GDP. By ignoring these factors, GDP would tend to overstate the true rise in the standard of living.

Visit this website (http://openstaxcollege.org/l/amdreamvalue) to read about the American Dream and standards of living.

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 153

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

GDP is Rough, but Useful A high level of GDP should not be the only goal of macroeconomic policy, or government policy more broadly. Even though GDP does not measure the broader standard of living with any precision, it does measure production well and it does indicate when a country is materially better or worse off in terms of jobs and incomes. In most countries, a significantly higher GDP per capita occurs hand in hand with other improvements in everyday life along many dimensions, like education, health, and environmental protection.

No single number can capture all the elements of a term as broad as “standard of living.” Nonetheless, GDP per capita is a reasonable, rough-and-ready measure of the standard of living.

How is the Economy Doing? How Does One Tell? To determine the state of the economy, one needs to examine economic indicators, such as GDP. To calculate GDP is quite an undertaking. It is the broadest measure of a nation’s economic activity and we owe a debt to Simon Kuznets, the creator of the measurement, for that.

The sheer size of the U.S. economy as measured by GDP is huge—as of the third quarter of 2013, $16.6 trillion worth of goods and services were produced annually. Real GDP informed us that the recession of 2008–2009 was a severe one and that the recovery from that has been slow, but is improving. GDP per capita gives a rough estimate of a nation’s standard of living. This chapter is the building block for other chapters that explore more economic indicators such as unemployment, inflation, or interest rates, and perhaps more importantly, will explain how they are related and what causes them to rise or fall.

154 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

business cycle

depreciation

depression

double counting

durable good

exchange rate

final good and service

GDP per capita

gross domestic product (GDP)

gross national product (GNP)

intermediate good

inventory

national income

net national product (NNP)

nominal value

nondurable good

peak

real value

recession

service

standard of living

structure

trade balance

trade deficit

trade surplus

trough

KEY TERMS

the relatively short-term movement of the economy in and out of recession

the process by which capital ages over time and therefore loses its value

an especially lengthy and deep decline in output

a potential mistake to be avoided in measuring GDP, in which output is counted more than once as it travels through the stages of production

long-lasting good like a car or a refrigerator

the price of one currency in terms of another currency

output used directly for consumption, investment, government, and trade purposes; contrast with “intermediate good”

GDP divided by the population

the value of the output of all goods and services produced within a country in a year

includes what is produced domestically and what is produced by domestic labor and business abroad in a year

output provided to other businesses at an intermediate stage of production, not for final users; contrast with “final good and service”

good that has been produced, but not yet been sold

includes all income earned: wages, profits, rent, and profit income

GDP minus depreciation

the economic statistic actually announced at that time, not adjusted for inflation; contrast with real value

short-lived good like food and clothing

during the business cycle, the highest point of output before a recession begins

an economic statistic after it has been adjusted for inflation; contrast with nominal value

a significant decline in national output

product which is intangible (in contrast to goods) such as entertainment, healthcare, or education

all elements that affect people’s happiness, whether these elements are bought and sold in the market or not

building used as residence, factory, office building, retail store, or for other purposes

gap between exports and imports

exists when a nation's imports exceed its exports and is calculated as imports –exports

exists when a nation's exports exceed its imports and is calculated as exports – imports

during the business cycle, the lowest point of output in a recession, before a recovery begins

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 155

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

KEY CONCEPTS AND SUMMARY

6.1 Measuring the Size of the Economy: Gross Domestic Product The size of a nation’s economy is commonly expressed as its gross domestic product (GDP), which measures the value of the output of all goods and services produced within the country in a year. GDP is measured by taking the quantities of all goods and services produced, multiplying them by their prices, and summing the total. Since GDP measures what is bought and sold in the economy, it can be measured either by the sum of what is purchased in the economy or what is produced.

Demand can be divided into consumption, investment, government, exports, and imports. What is produced in the economy can be divided into durable goods, nondurable goods, services, structures, and inventories. To avoid double counting, GDP counts only final output of goods and services, not the production of intermediate goods or the value of labor in the chain of production.

6.2 Adjusting Nominal Values to Real Values The nominal value of an economic statistic is the commonly announced value. The real value is the value after adjusting for changes in inflation. To convert nominal economic data from several different years into real, inflation- adjusted data, the starting point is to choose a base year arbitrarily and then use a price index to convert the measurements so that they are measured in the money prevailing in the base year.

6.3 Tracking Real GDP over Time Over the long term, U.S. real GDP have increased dramatically. At the same time, GDP has not increased the same amount each year. The speeding up and slowing down of GDP growth represents the business cycle. When GDP declines significantly, a recession occurs. A longer and deeper decline is a depression. Recessions begin at the peak of the business cycle and end at the trough.

6.4 Comparing GDP among Countries Since GDP is measured in a country’s currency, in order to compare different countries’ GDPs, we need to convert them to a common currency. One way to do that is with the exchange rate, which is the price of one country’s currency in terms of another. Once GDPs are expressed in a common currency, we can compare each country’s GDP per capita by dividing GDP by population. Countries with large populations often have large GDPs, but GDP alone can be a misleading indicator of the wealth of a nation. A better measure is GDP per capita.

6.5 How Well GDP Measures the Well-Being of Society GDP is an indicator of a society’s standard of living, but it is only a rough indicator. GDP does not directly take account of leisure, environmental quality, levels of health and education, activities conducted outside the market, changes in inequality of income, increases in variety, increases in technology, or the (positive or negative) value that society may place on certain types of output.

SELF-CHECK QUESTIONS 1. Country A has export sales of $20 billion, government purchases of $1,000 billion, business investment is $50 billion, imports are $40 billion, and consumption spending is $2,000 billion. What is the dollar value of GDP?

2. Which of the following are included in GDP, and which are not? a. The cost of hospital stays b. The rise in life expectancy over time c. Child care provided by a licensed day care center d. Child care provided by a grandmother e. The sale of a used car f. The sale of a new car g. The greater variety of cheese available in supermarkets h. The iron that goes into the steel that goes into a refrigerator bought by a consumer.

156 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

3. Using data from Table 6.5 how much of the nominal GDP growth from 1980 to 1990 was real GDP and how much was inflation?

4. Without looking at Table 6.7, return to Figure 6.10. If a recession is defined as a significant decline in national output, can you identify any post-1960 recessions in addition to the recession of 2008–2009? (This requires a judgment call.)

5. According to Table 6.7, how often have recessions occurred since the end of World War II (1945)?

6. According to Table 6.7, how long has the average recession lasted since the end of World War II?

7. According to Table 6.7, how long has the average expansion lasted since the end of World War II?

8. Is it possible for GDP to rise while at the same time per capita GDP is falling? Is it possible for GDP to fall while per capita GDP is rising?

9. The Central African Republic has a GDP of 1,107,689 million CFA francs and a population of 4.862 million. The exchange rate is 284.681CFA francs per dollar. Calculate the GDP per capita of Central African Republic.

10. Explain briefly whether each of the following would cause GDP to overstate or understate the degree of change in the broad standard of living.

a. The environment becomes dirtier b. The crime rate declines c. A greater variety of goods become available to consumers d. Infant mortality declines

REVIEW QUESTIONS

11. What are the main components of measuring GDP with what is demanded?

12. What are the main components of measuring GDP with what is produced?

13. Would you usually expect GDP as measured by what is demanded to be greater than GDP measured by what is supplied, or the reverse?

14. Why must double counting be avoided when measuring GDP?

15. What is the difference between a series of economic data over time measured in nominal terms versus the same data series over time measured in real terms?

16. How do you convert a series of nominal economic data over time to real terms?

17. What are the typical patterns of GDP for a high- income economy like the United States in the long run and the short run?

18. What are the two main difficulties that arise in comparing the GDP of different countries?

19. List some of the reasons why GDP should not be considered an effective measure of the standard of living in a country.

CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS

20. U.S. macroeconomic data are thought to be among the best in the world. Given what you learned in the Clear It Up "How do statisticians measure GDP?", does this surprise you? Or does this simply reflect the complexity of a modern economy?

21. What does GDP not tell us about the economy?

22. Should people typically pay more attention to their real income or their nominal income? If you choose the latter, why would that make sense in today’s world? Would your answer be the same for the 1970s?

23. Why do you suppose that U.S. GDP is so much higher today than 50 or 100 years ago?

Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective 157

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]

24. Why do you think that GDP does not grow at a steady rate, but rather speeds up and slows down?

25. Cross country comparisons of GDP per capita typically use purchasing power parity equivalent exchange rates, which are a measure of the long run equilibrium value of an exchange rate. In fact, we used PPP equivalent exchange rates in this module. Why

could using market exchange rates, which sometimes change dramatically in a short period of time, be misleading?

26. Why might per capita GDP be only an imperfect measure of a country’s standard of living?

27. How might a “green” GDP be measured?

PROBLEMS 28. Last year, a small nation with abundant forests cut down $200 worth of trees. $100 worth of trees were then turned into $150 worth of lumber. $100 worth of that lumber was used to produce $250 worth of bookshelves. Assuming the country produces no other outputs, and there are no other inputs used in the production of trees, lumber, and bookshelves, what is this nation's GDP? In other words, what is the value of the final goods produced including trees, lumber and bookshelves?

29. The “prime” interest rate is the rate that banks charge their best customers. Based on the nominal interest rates and inflation rates given in Table 6.10, in which of the years given would it have been best to be a lender? Based on the nominal interest rates and inflation rates given in Table 6.10, in which of the years given would it have been best to be a borrower?

Year Prime Interest Rate Inflation Rate

1970 7.9% 5.7%

1974 10.8% 11.0%

1978 9.1% 7.6%

1981 18.9% 10.3%

Table 6.10

30. A mortgage loan is a loan that a person makes to purchase a house. Table 6.11 provides a list of the mortgage interest rate being charged for several different years and the rate of inflation for each of those years.

In which years would it have been better to be a person borrowing money from a bank to buy a home? In which years would it have been better to be a bank lending money?

Year Mortgage Interest

Rate Inflation

Rate

1984 12.4% 4.3%

1990 10% 5.4%

2001 7.0% 2.8%

Table 6.11

31. Ethiopia has a GDP of $8 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 55 million. Costa Rica has a GDP of $9 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 4 million. Calculate the per capita GDP for each country and identify which one is higher.

32. In 1980, Denmark had a GDP of $70 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 5.1 million. In 2000, Denmark had a GDP of $160 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 5.3 million. By what percentage did Denmark’s GDP per capita rise between 1980 and 2000?

33. The Czech Republic has a GDP of 1,800 billion koruny. The exchange rate is 20 koruny/U.S. dollar. The Czech population is 20 million. What is the GDP per capita of the Czech Republic expressed in U.S. dollars?

158 Chapter 6 | The Macroeconomic Perspective

This content is available for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11626/1.10

Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]