Chapters Summary
CHAPTER 6
Critical Issues in Policing
Introduction
- Police work is dangerous
- Police may confront violent/angry people
- May be assaulted or killed in the line of duty
Police Discretion
- Discretion: the authority of the police to choose one course of action over another
- Discretion is the heart of police work
- Used to determine if and how to proceed within the confines of the law
Full Law Enforcement
- Police respond formally to all suspicious behavior
- Impractical
- Most violations minor
- Criminal justice system does not have resources for full enforcement
- Paperwork and court time
- Vague legal statutes
- Strain police/community relations
Selective Law Enforcement
- Police under-enforce some laws, over-enforce others
- Problematic
- Unfair for police to respond differently to similar situations
- Officers may abuse power by targeting specific individuals or groups
- May lead to favoritism and corruption
Legal Factors Affecting Arrest
- Seriousness of offense
- Prior arrest record
- Presence of evidence
- Reasonable suspicion
Nonlegal Factors Affecting Arrest
- Demeanor and respect toward law enforcement
- Race
- Sex
- Social class
Additional Extralegal Factors
- Officer characteristics may affect arrest decision
- Age
- Education level
- Race
- Gender
- Department policy
- Informal culture of department
Pros and Cons of Discretion
- Arguments in support of discretion, need for individualized justice
- Cons
- Low visibility of discretionary decisions
- Suspects denied due process
- Some citizens receive preferential treatment
- Public may see discretion as being biased against some groups
Controlling Police Discretion
- Written rules provide officers with guidelines re what actions to take in certain situations
- High-speed pursuits
- Use of force
- Handling special populations
- Overtime hours
- Outside employment
- Technology
- Automatic Vehicle Locator monitors patrol cars
Police Corruption
- Misuse of authority by officers for the benefit of themselves or others
- One of the oldest and most persistent problems in policing
Costs of Police Corruption
- Undermines agency integrity
- Protects other criminal activities
- Undermines criminal justice system effectiveness
- Undermines agency professionalism
- Imposes secret tax on honest businesses
- Undermines public confidence in police
Types of Corruption
- Corruption of authority
- Kickbacks
- Opportunistic theft
- Shakedowns
- Protection of illegal activities
- “Fixing” charges
- Direct criminal activities
- Internal payoffs
- “Flaking” or “pudding”
- Noble cause corruption
Investigating Police Corruption
- Chicago Crime Commission (1920s)
- Wickersham Commission (1929)
- Knapp Commission (1973)
- Grass eaters
- Meat eaters
- Mollen Commission (1990s)
Corrupt Police Departments
- Rotten apples and rotten pockets
- Pervasive unorganized corruption
- Pervasive organized corruption
Explaining Police Corruption
- Officer personality
- Police discretion
- Minimal supervision
- Low public visibility
- Limited accountability
- Peer group secrecy
- Managerial secrecy
Managing Police Corruption
- Honest administration; chiefs lead by example
- Train recruits
- Internal Affairs unit
- Prosecute officers suspected of breaking the law
- Reward honest officers
Police Use of Force
- Capacity to use coercive force a defining characteristic of policing
- Limits on force police may use
- Limited by law
- May only use when performing official duties
- Not used maliciously or frivolously
- General rule: Police may only use as much force as reasonably necessary
Police Brutality
- Unlawful use of force: all unnecessary force used by police
- 1931 commission found widespread use of coercion and force
- Commission investigating the LAPD after Rodney King assault found 5% of officers accounted for more than 20% of allegations of excessive force
Reducing Police Brutality
- Identification of violence-prone officers before they act out
- Independent review boards
- More effective disciplinary procedures
- Refined police selection criteria
- More thorough police training
Deadly Force
- Fleeing-felon rule: police could shoot fleeing felony suspect
- Tennessee v. Garner (1985) found this doctrine unconstitutional
- Defense-of-life standard: use deadly force only in defense of own or another’s life
- Preservation-of-life standard: police must use every other means possible to maintain order before turning to deadly force
Deadly Force
- Deadly force: amount of force likely to cause serious bodily harm or death to another person
- Departments may be sued, officers may be criminally prosecuted or dismissed
- Deadly force not evenly applied
- Varies between cities and across neighborhoods
- Racial and ethnic minorities killed in disproportionate numbers
- Few police-citizen contacts end with deadly force
High-Speed Pursuits
- Can be very dangerous; suspects, innocent bystanders, officers may be injured or killed
- Departments are training officers in defensive driving
- Formalizing procedures and enforcing written policies regarding when officers may participate in pursuit of fleeing suspect
Decision to Pursue
- Severity of the offending infraction
- Speed of travel
- Number of pedestrians and vehicles on the street
- Weather conditions
- Whether suspect is known and can be apprehended later
- Whether benefits of apprehension outweigh the risks of pursuit
Police Stress
- Interferes with police officers’ ability to carry out duties
- Stress: upsetting condition, occurs in response to adverse external influences, capable of affecting officer’s physical health
Causes of Police Stress
- Personal/family factors
- Nature of police work
- Conflict with supervisors
- Frustration with courts
- Relations with media
- Criticism from public
Factors Affecting Stress Levels
- Officer’s personality and background characteristics
- Work experience
- Level of education
- Assigned duties
Results of Stress
- Poor job performance
- Absenteeism
- Corruption
- Alcoholism
- Heart disease
- Divorce
- Child abuse/neglect
Women in Policing
- Lola Baldwin: first female officer
- 1905, Portland, OR PD
- Alice Stebbins-Wells: first regularly commissioned female officer
- 1910, LAPD
- By 1925, women employed in more than 145 departments
- Today, nearly 12% of all police officers nationwide are female
Women in Policing
- 1967 President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice report stated women should perform same duties as men
- Glass ceiling: percentage of women in supervisory roles is very small
Women in Policing
- Women officers equally effective as men
- Perform as well as men, use similar techniques, no more likely to display weapons
- Less likely to use deadly force
- Respond more effectively to domestic violence incidents than men
African Americans in Policing
- First African American officers hired in Washington, D.C. in 1861
- 1900: about 3% of all officers were African American
- Today about 12% of officers are African Americans
- Few differences in job performance between African American and white officers
Latinos in Policing
- First Latino officers hired in 1896 in NYC
- Today about 11.6% of officers are Latinos (about 14% of U.S. population is Latino)
Female and Minority Local Police Officers
Source: Hickman, M., & Reaves, B.A. (2015). Local police departments, 2013. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice
Increases in Minority Officers
- Increase partly due to lawsuits filed by African Americans and Latinos
- Charged that departments discriminate against them on entrance requirements and promotion exams
- Supreme Court has ruled that departments must demonstrate hiring and promotion requirements are job related, bias free, fairly administered, properly graded
Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972
- Set stage for affirmative action programs and quota systems for hiring and promotion of police officers
- Critics of quotas say they violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Proponents say they are a needed remedy for past wrongs