DISCUSSION POST

profilebigcabbage
CHAPTER6CULTUREANDCHANGE2.pptx

Culture and Change

Steven H Kim

Culture

“way things are done around here”

“attitudes and behaviors”

NORMS

Culture REINFORCES beliefs (over time)

Underlying CONVICTIONS and VALUES

NOT NECESSARILY the STATED VALUES

CUES or CLIMATE (“how one should behave”)

6 Ways in which Cultures EVOLVE

GENERAL evolution

SPECIFIC evolution

GUIDED evolution

PLANNED or MANAGED culture change

PARTIAL or TOTAL cultural destruction

Why Culture Change

COPE, SURVIVE, ADAPT, FIT

Should not be ‘EVERYTHING IS BAD’ mentality

Build on STRENGTHS

NEED FOR CHANGE HIGHLIGHTED thru…

SENIOR MANAGER

DECREE – “we need culture change”

RECOGNITION

That the existing culture is HINDERING CHANGE

DESIGNED CHANGE MANAGEMENT

Is present culture ALIGNED to change effort

Assessments , Frameworks, Profiles

Thoughts on ASSESSMENT EFFORTS

SCAN THE ENVIRONMENT : S. W. O . T

Deep embedded ATTTITUDES and BEHAVIORS surface when you try to change

Deeper core issues: ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY , VALUES, BELIEFS

Reinforced

Rituals

Ceremonies

Symbols

Traditions

SOCIAL COHESION reinforces culture

Heros

Stories

Harrison & Handy

Saw that you can categorize organizations by

CENTRALIZED or DISTRIBUTED control

FORMAL or INFORMAL

4 categories

TASK

ROLE

PERSON

POWER

Power

High Formalization

Low Centralization

POWER IN THE HANDS OF A FEW

QUICK DECISIONS

LOW BUREAUCRACY

CAN BECOME TOXIC

ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS (SMALL)

ROLE

High Formalization

High Centralization

MANY RULES

HIGHLY CONTROLED

EVERYONE KNOWS THEIR “ROLE” OR “PLACE”

LONG CHAIN OF COMMAND

SLOW DECISIONS

RISK ADVERSE

BUREACRATIC

BIG BUSINESS, ORGs, COMPANIES, FOUNDATIONS, HOSPITALS

TASK

Low Formalization

High Centralization

Teams for problem solving , PROJECTS

TASK IS MOST IMPORTANT

Team dependent

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

PERSON

LOW CENTRALIZATION

LOW FORMALIZATION

Individuals

Feel superior, unique

Can be COLLECTION of INDIVIDUALS working for ORG.

Academic Professionals, firms with PROFESSIONALS (i.e. accountants, lawyers, REAL ESTATE FIRM)

Cameron & Quinn (2011): “COMPETING VALUES FRAMEWORK”

First DIMENSION

INTERNAL ORIENTATION

EXTERNAL ORIENTATION

Second DIMENSION

STABILITY

FLEXIBILITY

4 CATEGORIES

CLAN

HIERARCHY

ADHOCRACY

MARKET

CLAN

INTERNAL

FLEXIBLE

PIXAR

JAPANESE companies

HIERARCHY

INTERNAL

STABLE

Government

McDonald’s

ADHOCRACY

EXTERNAL

FLEXIBLE

Google

MARKET

EXTERNAL

STABLE

XEROX

Cameron and Quinn

Tensions created by DIMENSIONS

Do we stay

Outward or Inward

Controlling or flexible

MANY ORGANIZATIONS have ELEMENTS of each DIMENSIONS

Frameworks and Profiles

POSITIVE

Make sense of organization

If undergoing assessment, it means they are SERIOUS ABOUT CHANGE

Increase SELF AWARENESS

NEGATIVE

Some believe CULTURE CANNOT BE MEASURED (Schein)

Can be SURFACE LEVEL

Can lead to LABELING

Values

Values : Key to Understanding Culture

Beliefs, values, ideals SHARED BY MEMBERS

Influences BEHAVIOR and ATTITUDES

Its their COMPASS especially during DIFFICULT TIMES

Schein states:

Values ORGINATED W FOUNDER and SENIOR LEADERS

STRUCTURED THE ORGANIZATION

BEHAVIORS FOLLOWED

SUCCESS REINFORCED VALUES

BOURNES & JENKINS (2013) : 4 Value Types

ESPOUSED

What senior leader STATES

ATTRIBUTED

How people DESCRIBE those values

SHARED

Shared values of SMALLER UNITS

ASPIRATIONAL

In an IDEAL WORLD what everyone would embody

Core values are not necessarily Espoused

Do Personal Values have to MATCH Org. Values ?

IF ORG – INDIVIDUAL values FIT

Increase COMMITMENT

JOB SATISFACTION

Look for BEST FIT

MISFIT can cause EMOTIONAL LABOR

LOOKED GOOD ON PAPER (ESPOUSED VALUES)

BUT NOT IN PRACTICE (CORE “REAL” VALUES)

Facilitating Culture Change

McKinsey 7s model

https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/515451119841650208/

McKinsey

DIANOSE

current INTERNAL STATE

ARTICULATE

desired FUTURE STATE

START

process for change

Johnson & Scholes (1999)

Cultural WEB – interconnected elements

Stories

Symbols

Power structures

Organization structure

Control systems

Ritual and routines

CENTER – PARADIGM: underlying ASSUMPTIONS = CULTURE

WHAT THE ORG. IS ALL ABOUT

CORE VALUES

CULTURAL WEB https://www.businessgrowthhub.com/blogs/2017/03/cultural-differences-the-importance-of-cultural-management-to-business-performance

Edgar Schein’s model of Organizational Culture

Role of Leaders

How Leaders can STIMULATE / REINFORCE CULTURE CHANGE

2006

Higgs

60 % of business performance attributed to CULTURE

80 % of CULTURE can be attributed to LEADER (behavior , attitude)

2014

UK poll

Only 1/3 of staff see their “managers” or leaders as ROLE MODELS

Primary

PAY ATTENTION controls, measures

REACTION to crisis

RESOURCE allocation

ROLE – MODELING values

TEACHING, COACHING

RECRUITMENT, PROMOTION, EXCOMMUNICATION

Secondary ( ineffective if no primary )

ORG STRUCTURE

ORG SYSTEMS and PROCEDURES

RITES / RITUALS

DESIGN (space, building)

STORIES

FORMAL STATEMENTS (creeds, charters, policies)

Gladwell (2000) TIPPING POINT 80/20 PRINCIPLE

Connectors

Mavens (info specialists)

Salesperson

HERRERO (2008): VIRAL CHANGE Behavior change leads to culture change

Uncover and articulate

SMALL SET OF NON NEGOTIABLE BEHAVIORS

IDENTIFY and REACH OUT

Well connected, influential employees

ON GOING

coaching and support to key employees

TRACK CHANGE

Tell “success” stories

Keys

STORYTELLING

Purposeful, organic

NUDGE

Subtle changes

Architecture

Meeting room

COMMUNICATION

People learn best from each other

Social media

Know the difference AUTHORITY vs INFLUENCE