CONCEPTUAL DRAFT OF CHAPTER 1 INSTRUCTIONS
Chapter 6:
Measuring Crime
1
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Learning Objectives
• Recognize how different approaches to measuring crime illustrate general principles of conceptualization, operationalization, and measurement
• Understand what crimes are included in different measures • Describe different measures of crime and how they are
based on different units of analysis • Understand different purposes for collecting crime data • Explain different measures based on crimes known to
police • Describe the main features of victim surveys
2
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Learning Objectives, cont.
• Distinguish the main differences between crimes known to police and crimes measured through different types of surveys
• Understand why self-report measures are used, and list different types of crimes for which they are appropriate
• Summarize major series of self-reported measures of drug use • Understand how surveillance measures are obtained and used • Explain how different measures of crime satisfy criteria for
measurement quality • Recognize that we have different measures of crime because
each measure is imperfect
3
© 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Introduction
• Crime can be a dependent variable in exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, and applied studies
• Crime can also be an independent variable, as in a study of how crime affects fear and other attitudes
• It can be both: drug use <- -> other offenses
4
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
General Issues in Measuring Crime
• What offenses? • What units of analysis?
– Specific entities about which researchers collect information
– Offender, victim, offenses, incidents
• What purpose? – Monitoring – Agency Accountability – Research
5
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Crimes Known to Police
• Most widely used measures of crime are based on police records
• Certain types are detected almost exclusively by observation (traffic and victimless offenses)
• Most crimes reported by victim or witnesses
• What crimes are not measured well by police records? – Assaults
– Robberies
6
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Uniform Crime Reports (UCR)
• Circa 1929, under FBI since 1930s
• Originally, reporting voluntary, but now very common
• Type I offenses (index crimes/offenses): murder, rape, robbery, larceny, burglary, aggravated assault, motor vehicle theft, and arson (added in 1979)
• Type II offenses: a compilation of less serious crimes
• Summary-based, group level unit of analysis
7
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
The UCR and Measurement Quality • The UCR is neither an exclusive nor an exhaustive
measure
• Not all law enforcement agencies submit complete reports to the FBI, and the quality of the data submitted varies
• Summary-Based Measure of Crime – UCR data includes summary, or total, crime counts for reporting agencies
(cities/counties)
• UCR data are aggregates—cannot be used in descriptive or explanatory studies that focus on individual crimes, offenders, or victims
8
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Discussion Question 1
Why are aggregate and individual data both necessary?
9
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Incident-Based Police Records
• Based on incidents as units of analysis • Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR)
– Police agencies submit detailed info about individual homicide incidents
• Can conduct a variety of studies that examine individual events
10
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
National Incident-Based Reporting System
• Joint effort by FBI and BJS to convert UCR to a NIBRS
• NIBRS reports each crime incident rather than the total # of certain crimes for each law enforcement agency
• Many features are reported individually about each incident: offenses, offenders, victims
• UCR NIBRS • 8 Part I offenses 46 Group A offenses
11
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Discussion Question 2
What if you were in charge of a law enforcement agency? Why would you want to report to the UCR? Why might you not want to report?
12
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Other Revisions with NIBRS
• Hierarchy rule dropped • Victim type (individual, business,
government, society/public) • Attempted/Completed • Drug-related offenses • Computers and crime • Quality control; states require certification
13
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
NIBRS and Measurement Quality
• Eliminating the hierarchy rule means offense classifications are mutually exclusive – But not exhaustive, not all crimes are counted
• Creating auditing standards and requiring submission of data on computer readable media enhance reliability
• Crimes are selectively reported to police and selectively recorded by police – Voluntary: no agency is required to submit crime reports to the FBI
in any form
14
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Measuring Crime Through Victim Surveys
• Can obtain info on crimes not reported to police
• Can measure incidents police may not officially record as crimes
• Provides data on victims/offenders (individuals), and the incidents themselves (social artifacts)
15
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
National Crime Victimization Survey • Since 1972 by Census Bureau • Sought to illuminate the “dark figure of
unreported crime” • Longitudinal panel study: households agree
to participated for 3 years (7 interviews; one every 6 months) and then replaced
• Does not measure all crime • Respondents are asked screening questions
16
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Discussion Question 3
Would you participate in a victimization survey? Why or why not?
17
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Positive Elements of NCVS
• Measures both reported and unreported crime
• Independent of changes in reporting • More information about how crime impacted
victim than UCR • Provides more victim characteristics than
UCR
18
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Negative Elements of NCVS
• Telescoping incident dates • Faulty memory • Little information on offenders • No information on CJS response if
reported • Excludes crimes against commercial
establishments • Only includes residents of US
19
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
NCVS Redesign
• Sought to improve measurement of domestic violence and sexual assault
• Revised screening questions and added cues to help respondents recall and distinguish minor incidents
• More direct questions on rape and other sexual crimes
• Greater attention to measuring victimizations by someone the respondent knows
• Gradual increase of telephone interviews to replace in-person interviews
20
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Community Victimization Surveys
• First Development in late 1960’s – A series of city-level surveys by the Census Bureau
• 1998 BJS and the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) launched pilot surveys in 12 large and medium-sized cities – Jointly developed a guidebook and software so that
local law enforcement agencies and other groups can conduct their own community surveys
21
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Comparison
• Crimes Known to Police: – UCR – SHR – NIBRS
• Victim Surveys – NCVS – Community Victimization Surveys
22
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Surveys of Offending
• Delinquency, "victimless" crimes, and crimes rarely observed or reported to police may be measured by self-report surveys – Examples: prostitution, drug abuse, public order,
shoplifting, drunk driving
• Two ongoing self-report studies – National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) – Monitor the Future (MTF)
23
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
National Survey on Drug Use and Health
• Based on a national sample of households • Conducted since 1971; 2004 sample had
68,000 individuals • Includes questions to distinguish between
lifetime use, current use, and heavy use • Encourages candid responses via procedures • Includes residents of college dorms, rooming
houses, and homeless shelters
24
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Monitoring the Future
• Conducted since 1975 by the National Institute on Drug Abuse
• Includes several samples of high school students and others, totaling about 50,000 respondents each year
• Questions concern self-reported use of alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, delinquency, other acts
• A subset of 2,400 MTF respondents receive follow-up questionnaire
25
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Drug Surveillance Systems
• Surveillance systems have been developed to obtain alternative measures of drug use
• Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) – provides ongoing assessment of drug use among arrestees
• Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) – collects emergency medical treatment reports for “drug episodes” from a sample of hospitals
26
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Measuring Crime for Specific Purposes
• Local Crime and Self-Report Surveys – e.g., any purpose!
• Incident-Based Crime Reports – e.g., Newark PD vehicle theft
• Observing Crime – e.g., shoplifting, bar drinking, and violence
27
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Measuring Crime Summary
• UCR & SHR: best for murder and crimes in which the victim is a business or commercial establishment
• NCVS: best for crimes against persons or households that are not reported to police
• Self-report surveys: best at measuring crimes that do not have readily identifiable victims and that are less often observed by or reported to police
28