Paper#5

profileGurpreetG
Chapter6.Multiple-CriteriaMethodsforEvaluationandGroupDecisionMaking1-Tagged.pdf

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics Third Edition

Chapter 6 Multiple-Criteria Methods for Evaluation and Group

Decision Making

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-1 Decision Analysis Paradigm

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-2 Hierarchy of Objectives for Advanced Vehicle Systems

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-3 Graphical Assessment of Indifference Probability

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-4 Sample Interview Question for Relative Fuel Economy

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-5 Example of Utility Curve for Representative Consumer

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-6 Sample Interview Question Used to Determine Scaling Constant for the Relative Fuel Economy Attribute

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-7 Sample Interview Question Used to Determine Order of Importance of Attributes

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-8 Summary Three-Level Hierarchy for Selection Problem

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6-9 Human Productivity Objective Hierarchy

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6-1 Scale Used for Pairwise Comparisons

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6-2 Priority Vector for Major Criteria

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6-3 Local and Global Priorities for the Problem of Selecting an In-Orbit Assembly System

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6-4 Example G D S S Features to Support Six Task Types

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6-5

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6-6

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6A-1 Universal Self-Deployable Cargo Handler

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6A-2 Objective Hierarchy for Next- Generation Cargo Handler

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Figure 6A-3 Abbreviated Version of the Objective Hierarchy

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6A-1 Priority Vector for Major Criteria

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6A-2 Local and Global Priorities

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6A-3 Comparison of Responses Using the A H P

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6A-4 Summary of Results for the A H P Analysis

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6A-5 Attribute Data for Decision Maker 1

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6A-6 Scale Used for “Mission Objectives” Attribute

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6A-7 Comparison of A H P Weights and M A U T Scaling Constants for the Five Decision Makers

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Table 6A-8 Summary of Results for M A U T Analysis

Copyright © 2017, 2005, 1994 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Copyright

  • Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics
  • Figure 6-1 Decision Analysis Paradigm
  • Figure 6-2 Hierarchy of Objectives for Advanced Vehicle Systems
  • Figure 6-3 Graphical Assessment of Indifference Probability
  • Figure 6-4 Sample Interview Question for Relative Fuel Economy
  • Figure 6-5 Example of Utility Curve for Representative Consumer
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Figure 6-8 Summary Three-Level Hierarchy for Selection Problem
  • Figure 6-9 Human Productivity Objective Hierarchy
  • Table 6-1 Scale Used for Pairwise Comparisons
  • Table 6-2 Priority Vector for Major Criteria
  • Slide 13
  • Table 6-4 Example G D S S Features to Support Six Task Types
  • Table 6-5
  • Table 6-6
  • Figure 6A-1 Universal Self-Deployable Cargo Handler
  • Slide 18
  • Figure 6A-3 Abbreviated Version of the Objective Hierarchy
  • Table 6A-1 Priority Vector for Major Criteria
  • Table 6A-2 Local and Global Priorities
  • Table 6A-3 Comparison of Responses Using the A H P
  • Table 6A-4 Summary of Results for the A H P Analysis
  • Table 6A-5 Attribute Data for Decision Maker 1
  • Table 6A-6 Scale Used for “Mission Objectives” Attribute
  • Slide 26
  • Table 6A-8 Summary of Results for M A U T Analysis
  • Copyright