Paper #4

profileGurpreetG
Chapter5.PortfolioManagementProjectScreeningandSelection2-Tagged.pdf

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.1 Project evaluation and selection process.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.1 An Example of a Checklist for Screening Projects

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.2 Multidimensional diagram for checklist example.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.2 An Example of a Scoring Model for Screening Projects

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.3 Environmental Scoring Form Used by Niagara Mohawk

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.4 Input Data and Results for Incremental Analysis

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.3 Relative effectiveness of systems.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.5 Data for C-E Analysis

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.4 Relationship between system effectiveness and cost.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.6 Some Definitions Related to Risk

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.5 Spider chart for sensitivity analysis.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.6 NPV comparisons for risk-adjusted MARRs.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.7 Data and Results for Reduction of Useful Life Example

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.7 After-tax parametric analysis for product.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.8 Systems engineering approach to risk assessment.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.9 Illustration of risk profile.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.10 Structure of decision tree.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.11 Segments of tree.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.12 Deterministic replacement problem.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.8 Computational Results for Replacement Problem in Figure 5.12

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.9 Computations for Replacement Problem with 12% Interest Rate

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.13 Automation problem before consideration of technology study.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.14 Automation problem with technology study taken into account.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.10 Expected NPV Calculations for the Automation Problem

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.15 One-stage FMS replacement problem.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.11 Computation of Posterior Probabilities Given That Investigation-Predicted Demand is High (h)

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.12 Computation of Posterior Probabilities Given That Investigation-Predicted Demand is Low (l)

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.16 Replacement problem with alternative of technology study.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.13 Expected NPV Calculations for Replacement Problem in Figure 5.13

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Figure 5.17 Hydraulic power unit.

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.14

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.15

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.16

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.17

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5.18

Copyright © 2017, 2005, and 1994 by Pearson Education, Inc.

All Rights Reserved

Project Management: Processes, Methodologies, and Economics, 3e Avraham Shtub, Moshe Rosenwein

Table 5A.1 Format for Applying Bayes’ Theorem

  • Figure 5.1 Project evaluation and selection process.
  • Table 5.1 An Example of a Checklist for Screening Projects
  • Figure 5.2 Multidimensional diagram for checklist example.
  • Table 5.2 An Example of a Scoring Model for Screening Projects
  • Table 5.3 Environmental Scoring Form Used by Niagara Mohawk
  • Table 5.4 Input Data and Results for Incremental Analysis
  • Figure 5.3 Relative effectiveness of systems.
  • Table 5.5 Data for C-E Analysis
  • Figure 5.4 Relationship between system effectiveness and cost.
  • Table 5.6 Some Definitions Related to Risk
  • Figure 5.5 Spider chart for sensitivity analysis.
  • Figure 5.6 NPV comparisons for risk-adjusted MARRs.
  • Table 5.7 Data and Results for Reduction of Useful Life Example
  • Figure 5.7 After-tax parametric analysis for product.
  • Figure 5.8 Systems engineering approach to risk assessment.
  • Figure 5.9 Illustration of risk profile.
  • Figure 5.10 Structure of decision tree.
  • Figure 5.11 Segments of tree.
  • Figure 5.12 Deterministic replacement problem.
  • Table 5.8 Computational Results for Replacement Problem in Figure 5.12
  • Table 5.9 Computations for Replacement Problem with 12% Interest Rate
  • Figure 5.13 Automation problem before consideration of technology study.
  • Figure 5.14 Automation problem with technology study taken into account.
  • Table 5.10 Expected NPV Calculations for the Automation Problem
  • Figure 5.15 One-stage FMS replacement problem.
  • Table 5.11 Computation of Posterior Probabilities Given That Investigation-Predicted Demand is High (h)
  • Table 5.12 Computation of Posterior Probabilities Given That Investigation-Predicted Demand is Low (l)
  • Figure 5.16 Replacement problem with alternative of technology study.
  • Table 5.13 Expected NPV Calculations for Replacement Problem in Figure 5.13
  • Figure 5.17 Hydraulic power unit.
  • Table 5.14
  • Table 5.15
  • Table 5.16
  • Table 5.17
  • Table 5.18
  • Table 5A.1 Format for Applying Bayes’ Theorem