Discussion 1 520
Justice Administration: Police,
Courts, and Corrections Management
Tenth Edition
Chapter 3
Rights of Criminal Justice Employees
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Overview (1 of 3)
• Law and litigation can arise out of federal and state constitutions, statutes, administrative regulations, and judicial
interpretations and rulings.
• Fair Labor Standards Act: Provides minimum salary and
overtime provisions for both public- and private-sector employees.
• Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Prohibits
discrimination in the hiring process, working conditions and the unlawful provision of benefits based on race, color, religion,
sex, and national origin.
– Also extends to hostile work environment.
• Equal Pay Act: Prevents sex-based discrimination in wages and benefits when men and women do similar work.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Overview (2 of 3)
• The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978: Prohibits
unequal treatment of women because of pregnancy or
related medical conditions (e.g., nausea).
• Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Generally
prohibits the unequal treatment of applicants or
employees based on their age, if they are age 40 years or
older, in regard to hiring, firing, receiving benefits, and
other conditions of employment.
• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: The goal of
this legislation is to remove barriers that might prevent
otherwise qualified individuals with disabilities from
enjoying the same employment opportunities as persons
without disabilities.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Overview (3 of 3)
• Section 1983: This major piece of legislation is the
instrument by which an employee may sue an employer
for civil rights violations based on the deprivation of
constitutional rights.
• Remedies that can affect public-sector employees:
– Tort actions
– Contractual claims
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Recruitment and Hiring
• Tests are commonly used to determine intelligence,
emotional suitability and stability, physical agility, and
character.
• Drug tests are frequently used as well.
• The critical question for these tests is whether they validly
test the types of skills needed for the job.
• A companion concern is whether the tests are used for
discriminatory purposes or have an unequal impact on
protected groups.
• A number of private companies provide valid, reliable
examinations for use by the public sector.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disparate Treatment
• Treating people differently because of their age, gender,
sex, or other protected status is illegal.
• Federal equal opportunity law prohibits the use of
selection procedures for hiring or promotion that have a
discriminatory impact on the employment opportunities of
women, people of color, or other protected classes.
• Bona fide occupational qualifier (B F O Q):
– In certain situations, a rationale for discriminating on
the basis of a business necessity.
– There may be a "business justification" for hiring
policies even though they have a disparate impact.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
How Old Is “Too Old” in Criminal
Justice?
• Age Discrimination in Employment Act (A D E A) held that
age should not be a B F O Q because youthfulness is not a
guarantee of public safety.
– A physical fitness standard would better serve the
purpose of ensuring the ability to perform the tasks of
the position.
• Congress exempted federal employees from application
of the A D E A.
• However, the Supreme Court ruled that another agency
cannot adopt the same standards without showing an
agency-specific need.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Criminal Justice and Affirmative
Action
• Affirmative action:
– Actions or policies that favor persons or groups who have experienced discrimination, particularly in employment or
education.
– Quotas have been at the center of legal, social, scientific,
and political controversy for more than four decades.
– In general, affirmative action plans give preferred treatment only to affected groups when all other criteria are equal.
• Reverse discrimination:
– The argument that affirmative action policies have resulted
in unfair treatment for members of majority groups.
– Key legal question: When does preferential hiring become
reverse discrimination?
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Property Rights in Employment (1 of 2)
• The Fourteenth Amendment provides in part:
– "... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property without due process of law ..."
• Supreme Court outlined 4 elements of a due process claim under
Section 1983:
1. Person acting under color of state law
2. Deprived an individual
3. Of constitutionally protected property
4. Without due process of law
• Courts have established the legal view that public employees have a
property interest in their employment (as opposed to the old view that
employees served "at will“).
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Property Rights in Employment (2 of 2)
• Property right in employment:
– Positions that individuals have for which there must be
some demonstrated cause for termination (as opposed
to an individual in an “at will” position).
• Employees are entitled to both a pre-termination hearing
and a post-termination notice, as well as an opportunity to
respond.
• However, a probationary employee has little or no
property interest in employment.
• Policymaking employees are generally exempted from
such protections.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Pay and Benefits
• Fair Labor Standards Act (F L S A) - “the C J administrator’s worst nightmare”:
– Establishes minimum wages and requires overtime
compensation in the private sector and to state and local
government employees.
– The F L S A comes into play when overtime salaries must be paid.
• Equal pay for equal work is another issue.
– Disparate treatment in pay and benefits can be litigated
under Title VII or statutes such as the Equal Pay Act or
the equal protection clause.
• C J employee benefits are also addressed in Title VII, the
A D E A, and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (P D A).
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Criminal Justice and a Safe
Workplace
• Federal, state, and local governments are exempted from
the coverage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act
(O S H A).
• Nonetheless, criminal justice work is often dangerous: it
involves the use of force and often occurs in places
outside governmental control.
• Liability for an employee’s injury, disability, or death is a
critical concern for C J agencies.
– Civil tort actions in these cases can have a devastating
impact on governmental budgets.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Freedom of Speech and Association (1 of 3)
• Many criminal justice executives have attempted to
regulate what their employees say to the public.
• Executives develop and rely on policies and procedures
designed to govern employee speech.
• The Supreme Court held that: "the State has interests as
an employer in regulating the speech of its employees
that differ significantly from those it possesses in
connection with regulation of the speech of the citizenry in
general.“
• The state may impose restrictions on its employees that it
cannot impose on the citizenry at large – but these
restrictions must be reasonable.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Freedom of Speech and Association (2 of 3)
• Two basic situations in which a police regulation may be found to be an unreasonable infringement on the free speech
interests of officers:
– When the action is overly broad.
– When the free speech limitations are unreasonable in the
way in which the governmental action is applied.
• The most protected type of speech is political speech.
– However, governmental agencies may restrict the political behavior of their employees.
– The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of laws
that do so.
• The Hatch Act limits partisan political activities by governmental
employees.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Freedom of Speech and Association (3 of 3)
• It is a violation of the employees' First Amendment rights
to discharge them from non-policymaking positions solely
on the basis of their political party affiliation.
• Nonpolitical associations are also protected by the First
Amendment.
• Police departments commonly prohibit officers from
associated with known felons.
– Rules against association must not be overly broad.
• Police administrators have the constitutional authority to
regulate employees’ off-duty associational activities.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Searches and Seizures
• The Fourth Amendment protects "the right of the people to
be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures."
• The Fourth Amendment usually applies to police officers
when they are at home or off duty in the same manner as
it applies to all citizens.
• Police officers can be compelled to cooperate with
investigations of their behavior.
– Examples include appearing in a lineup as well as
searches of department equipment and lockers.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Self-Incrimination
• In Garrity v. New Jersey, the Court held that the
information coerced from an officer could not be used
against them at their criminal trial because the Fifth
Amendment forbids the use of coerced confessions.
• It is proper to fire a police officer who refuses to answer
questions if the officer has been informed that any
answers may not be used later in a criminal proceeding.
• The majority of lower courts that have considered the
question have held that an officer can be required to
submit to a polygraph examination.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Religious Practices
• It is generally assumed that someone who takes a
criminal justice position agrees to work odd shifts and to
abide by other various unpleasant conditions.
– Generally, personnel with the least seniority on the job
must work the most undesirable shifts.
• Occasionally the job and one's religious beliefs are in
direct conflict.
– Employees may be forced to choose between their job
and religion.
– A number of people have chosen to litigate the work–
religion conflict rather than accept agency demands.
– Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits
religious discrimination in employment.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Sexual Misconduct
• Instances of sexual impropriety in criminal justice work
can range from casual flirting while on the job to becoming
romantically involved with a foreign agent whose principal
aim is to learn delicate matters of national security.
• There have been all manner of incidents between those
extremes, including the discipline of police officers who
posed nude in magazines.
• Some major police departments have even been
compelled by their mayors to recruit officers for their
sexual orientation.
• Departments try to maintain high standards of officer
conduct while officers litigate because they believe their
right to privacy has been intruded upon.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Residency Requirements
• Many governmental agencies now specify that all or certain employees must live within the city or county of employment.
• Justifications for residency requirements:
– Employees should become familiar with and be visible in
the jurisdiction of employment.
– Employees should live where they are paid by the
taxpayers to work.
– C J employees must live within a certain proximity of their work in order to respond quickly in the event of an
emergency.
• Arguments have been made that in areas where housing is
unavailable or exceptionally expensive, a residency requirement is unreasonable.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Moonlighting
• The courts have traditionally supported criminal justice
agencies placing limitations on the amount and kind of
outside work their employees can perform.
• The rationale is that "outside employment seriously
interferes with keeping the [police and fire] departments fit
and ready for action at all times.”
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Misuse of Firearms
• Police are empowered to use lethal force when justified.
• Police agencies generally have policies regulating the use
of firearms by officers, both on and off duty.
• The courts have held that such regulations need only be
reasonable.
• Police firearms regulations tend to address three basic
issues:
1. Requirements for the safeguarding of the weapon.
2. Guidelines for carrying the weapon while off duty.
3. Limitations on when the weapon may be fired.
• Courts/juries becoming harsher in dealing with officers
who misuse their firearms.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Alcohol and Drugs in the Workplace
• Criminal justice employees must be able to perform their
work with a clear head, unaffected by alcohol or drugs.
• Police departments and prisons will often specify in their
manual of policy and procedures that no alcoholic
beverages be consumed within a specified period prior to
reporting for duty.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Drug Testing
• Three of the most controversial drug-testing issues have
been:
– Whether testing should be permitted when there is no
indication of a drug problem in the workplace
– Whether the testing methods are reliable
– Whether a positive test proves on-the-job impairment
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Rights of Police Officers (1 of 3)
• Police officers have insisted on greater procedural
safeguards to protect themselves against what they
perceive as arbitrary infringement on their rights.
• Peace Officers Bill of Rights (P O B R):
– Legislation mandating due process rights for peace
officers who are the subject of internal investigations
that could lead to disciplinary action.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Rights of Police Officers (2 of 3)
• Some common provisions of state P O B R legislation
include:
– Written notice: the officer must be given written notice
of the nature of the investigation, summary of alleged
misconduct, and name of the investigating officer.
– Right to representation: the officer may have an
attorney or a representative of the officer’s choosing
present during any phase of questioning/hearing.
– Polygraph examination: the officer may refuse to
take a polygraph examination unless the complainant
submits to an examination and is found to be telling
the truth.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Rights of Police Officers (3 of 3)
• Police officers today are more likely to file a grievance
when they believe their rights have been violated.
• Grievances may cover a broad range of issues, including:
– Salaries, overtime, leave, hours of work, allowances,
retirement, opportunity for advancement, performance
evaluations, workplace conditions, tenure, disciplinary
actions, supervisory methods, and administrative
practices.
• The preferred method for settling officer grievances is
through informal discussion.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Workplace Harassment (1 of 3)
• Unwelcome verbal or physical conduct (whether or not of
a sexual nature) that creates a hostile work environment,
or a change in an employment status or benefits.
• Harassment is a form of discrimination violating the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 and other federal laws.
• Unwelcome behavior constitutes harassment when:
– The conduct is sufficiently severe to create a hostile
work environment, or
– A supervisor’s harassing conduct results in a change
in employment status or benefits.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Workplace Harassment (2 of 3)
• Hostile work environment occurs when unwelcome comments or conduct based on sex, race, or other legally protected
characteristics unreasonably interferes with an employee’s
work performance or creates an offensive work environment.
• A claim of harassment generally requires that:
– The complaining party be a member of a statutorily protected class and was subjected to unwelcome verbal or
physical conduct.
– The unwelcome conduct complaint is based on the
complaining party’s membership in that protected class.
– The unwelcome conduct affected a term or condition of employment and unreasonably interfered with the
complaining party’s work performance.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Workplace Harassment (3 of 3)
• Police supervisors and managers must be vigilant of
sexually related improprieties, including:
– Nonsexual contacts that are sexually motivated
– Voyeuristic contacts
– Contacts with crime victims
– Contacts with offenders
– Contacts with juvenile offenders
– Sexual shakedowns
– Citizen-initiated sexual contacts
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
L G B T Q Rights in the Workplace
• The Supreme Court has ruled that an individual cannot be
fired for their sexual orientation or gender identity.
• The Civil Rights Act of 1964 will now protect employees
from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or
gender identity, even in those states that have no legal
protection for L G B T Q+ employees.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
F M L A: Eligibility Requirements
• Family Medical Leave Act (F M L A) entitles eligible employees to take
up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave in a 12-month period
for specified family and medical reasons.
• To be eligible for F M L A benefits, an employee must:
– Work for a covered employer, and
– Have worked for a covered employer for at least 12 months, and
have worked at least 1,250 hours during that time.
• F M L A allows unpaid leave:
– For the birth and care of a newborn child of the employee.
– For placement with the employee of a child for adoption or child
care.
– To care for an immediate family member with a serious health
condition.
– To take medical leave when the employee is unable to work
because of a serious health condition.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
F M L A: Amendments to the Act
• 2009 and 2010 amendments created new categories of
leave designed to ease hardships on military families:
– Qualifying exigency leave
– Military caregiver leave
• In 2013, in U.S. v. Windsor, the Supreme Court ensured
that the F M L A affords spouses in same-sex marriages the
same ability as all spouses to fully exercise their F M L A
rights.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Americans with Disabilities Act
• Criminal justice agencies may not discriminate against
qualified individuals with disabilities in recruitment, hiring,
and promotion practices.
• A person has a disability if they have a mental or physical
impairment that substantially limits a major life activity,
such as walking, talking, breathing, sitting, standing, or
learning.
• Employers must provide reasonable accommodation to
people with disabilities, which can include modifying
existing facilities to make them accessible, job
restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules,
acquiring or modifying equipment, and changing policies.
• Blanket exclusions of individuals with a particular disability
are, in most cases, impermissible.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Break Time for Nursing Mothers
• The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
encouraged employers to provide break time for nursing
mothers to express milk in “a place, other than a
bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from
intrusion from coworkers and the public.”
• All employers covered by F M L A are required to provide
such breaks.
• Employers are not required to compensate employees for
these breaks, unless they are already compensated by
the employer.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Addressing Grooming and
Appearance: Employers’ Rights (1 of 2)
• Dress codes and appearances:
– Grooming and tattoos with Millennials is posing
challenges to C J administrators.
– Kelley v. Johnson still remains intact and
administrators are free to determine that body
modifications create an unprofessional appearance.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Addressing Grooming and
Appearance: Employers’ Rights (2 of 2)
• Dress code: a set of rules, usually written as policy,
specifying the required manner of dress and appearance
for employees in an organization.
• New generations entering the labor market are bringing
new views with respect to workers’ appearance.
• Criminal justice administrators have long been able to
regulate officers’ appearance – this was upheld by the
Supreme Court in Kelley v. Johnson.
• Most agencies have general orders or policies constituting
a dress code.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Addressing Grooming and
Appearance: Employees’ Rights
• Tattooing is an increasing sticking point within the realm
of dress codes.
• 40% of millennials have at least one tattoo.
• As tattoos become more socially acceptable, it is more
difficult for C J administrators to take a totally anti-tattoo
position.
• We may be approaching a point where treating
employees differently because of their tattoos will be
illegal.
• However, Kelley v. Johnson remains intact, and
administrators are free to determine that body
modifications create an unprofessional appearance.
Copyright © 2023, 2019, 2015, 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright
This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is
provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their
courses and assessing student learning. Dissemination or sale
of any part of this work (including on the World Wide Web) will
destroy the integrity of the work and is not permitted. The work
and materials from it should never be made available to
students except by instructors using the accompanying text in
their classes. All recipients of this work are expected to abide by
these restrictions and to honor the intended pedagogical
purposes and the needs of other instructors who rely on these
materials.
- Slide 1: Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management
- Slide 2: Overview (1 of 3)
- Slide 3: Overview (2 of 3)
- Slide 4: Overview (3 of 3)
- Slide 5: Recruitment and Hiring
- Slide 6: Disparate Treatment
- Slide 7: How Old Is “Too Old” in Criminal Justice?
- Slide 8: Criminal Justice and Affirmative Action
- Slide 9: Property Rights in Employment (1 of 2)
- Slide 10: Property Rights in Employment (2 of 2)
- Slide 11: Pay and Benefits
- Slide 12: Criminal Justice and a Safe Workplace
- Slide 13: Freedom of Speech and Association (1 of 3)
- Slide 14: Freedom of Speech and Association (2 of 3)
- Slide 15: Freedom of Speech and Association (3 of 3)
- Slide 16: Searches and Seizures
- Slide 17: Self-Incrimination
- Slide 18: Religious Practices
- Slide 19: Sexual Misconduct
- Slide 20: Residency Requirements
- Slide 21: Moonlighting
- Slide 22: Misuse of Firearms
- Slide 23: Alcohol and Drugs in the Workplace
- Slide 24: Drug Testing
- Slide 25: Rights of Police Officers (1 of 3)
- Slide 26: Rights of Police Officers (2 of 3)
- Slide 27: Rights of Police Officers (3 of 3)
- Slide 28: Workplace Harassment (1 of 3)
- Slide 29: Workplace Harassment (2 of 3)
- Slide 30: Workplace Harassment (3 of 3)
- Slide 31: L G B T Q Rights in the Workplace
- Slide 32: F M L A: Eligibility Requirements
- Slide 33: F M L A: Amendments to the Act
- Slide 34: The Americans with Disabilities Act
- Slide 35: Break Time for Nursing Mothers
- Slide 36: Addressing Grooming and Appearance: Employers’ Rights (1 of 2)
- Slide 37: Addressing Grooming and Appearance: Employers’ Rights (2 of 2)
- Slide 38: Addressing Grooming and Appearance: Employees’ Rights
- Slide 39: Copyright