erm @ general motors

profileE_RK
chapter30-31-34.pptx

Chapters 30, 31, 34

Miscellaneous Case Studies on ERM & Risk

Three Case Studies

Alleged Corruption at Chessfield

Bon Boulangerie

Building an ERM Program at General Motors

Alleged Corruption at Chessfield

Chessfield

Fictional private American company in sports and entertainment

HQ in NYC

“Good ol’ boys” board

Informal governance

Whistle-blower

CEO compensation very high (4x comparable peers)

Potential environment for excessive risk taking

Chessfield CEO requested independent governance review

Alleged Corruption at Chessfield (Cont’d)

Review included

Document review – minimal documentation

Interviews – substantial discontent and lack of confidence in leadership

CEO compensation

Limited documentation to support decision

Basis seemed to be long relationship with decision makers

Industry standard metrics missing

Risk management

Few risk management protocols or controls

Most processes were manual (i.e. no IT)

Alleged Corruption at Chessfield (Cont’d)

Review resulted in 45 recommendations

43 from reviewer

2 added by regulator

All but 2 recommendations were accepted, which were

3 longest serving board member resign

A female be selected for directorship and compensation committee

Identify broad implications of this case

Bon Boulangerie

Bakery in Oakville, Ontario

When purchased, single site retail and café

Ray Pane added wholesale operation

Plan to expand wholesale business

From 20km to 120km coverage

Include grocery stores

Add product line

Goal: triple profits in 3 years

What are the operational risks?

Building an ERM Program at GM

ERM program began in 2010

ERM to help achieve competitive advantage

New CEO

GM bankruptcy in 2009

CRO appointed

Financial and Risk Policy Committee formed

Risk officers identified and aligned to all CEO direct reports

GM embraced aggressive ERM

GM Approach to ERM

ERM built on GM’s vision

Design, build, and sell the world’s best vehicles

Identify and manage key risks

Bottom-up approach Focus on “what can go right”

Lessons learned

Gave responsibility of assessing risk probability and impact to senior executives

Replaced ranked risk list with tiered list

Implemented a 5 point scale to measure

Inherent risk, Current risk, Residual risk

GM Risk Management Process

GM ERM Scale

GM Risk Title

Game Theory

Looking Forward

Top risk attention in place

Ready to add focus on day-to-day operational risk.

Developing program for operational control self- assessment (CSA)

Approach is a policy-based CSA

Starts with simple yes-no questions to line managers

Benefits of a policy-based program

Policy can be leveraged to ensure results

Helps to educate teams on larger scope objectives

Ensures that policies are current and effective