Statistic in Health Care Management Week 2

profilegregueira82
chapter3.pdf

Chapter 3

Quantifying the Extent of Disease

Critical Components of RCT

• Randomization

• Control Group – Ethical Issues

• Monitoring

– Interim Analysis

– Data and Safety Monitoring Board

• Data Management

• Reporting

Learning Objectives

• Define and differentiate prevalence and

incidence

• Select, compute and interpret the appropriate

measure to compare the extent of disease

between groups

• Compare and contrast, compute and interpret

relative risks, risk differences, and odds ratios

Prevalence

• Proportion of participants with disease at a particular

point in time

baselineatexaminedpersonsofNumber

diseasewithpersonsofNumber PrevalencePoint 

Example 3.1.

Computing Prevalence

Free of CVD

History of CVD

Total

Men 1548 244 1792

Women 1872 135 2007

Total 3420 379 3799

Prevalence of CVD = 379/3799 = 0.0998 = 9.98%

Prevalence of CVD in Men = 244/1792 = 0.1362 = 13.62%

Prevalence of CVD in Women = 135/2007 = 0.0673 = 6.73%

Example-H1N1 Outbreak

• H1N1 outbreak first noticed in Mexico

• Large outbreak early on in La Gloria-a small village outside of Mexico City.

• Studied extensively in the first report on H1N1 (Fraser, Donelly et al. “Pandemic potential of a strain of Influenza (H1N1): early findings”, Science Express, 11 May 2009.)

• Important questions: Who is most likely to be impacted? What are the characteristics of people commonly impacted?

Computing Prevalence

Age No ILI ILI Total

<44 years 703 522 1225

> 44 years 256 94 350

Total 959 616 1575

Data on H1N1 outbreak in La Gloria, Mexico.

n=1575 villagers (out of 2155) were surveyed to

determine if they had influenza like illness (ILI)

between 2/15/09 and 4/27/09.

Computing Prevalence

Age No ILI ILI Total

<44 years 703 522 1225

> 44 years 256 94 350

Total 959 616 1575

Prevalence of ILI=616/1575=0.3911=39.11%

Prevalence of ILI in <44=522/1225=0.4261=42.61%

Prevalence of ILI in >44=94/350=0.2686=26.86%

Incidence

• Likelihood of developing disease among persons free of

disease who are at risk of developing disease

baselineatriskatpersonsofNumber

period specified a during diseasedevelop whopersonsofNumber IncidenceCumulative 

freediseasearepersonswhichduringtimeoflengthstheofSum

period specified a during diseasedevelop whopersonsofNumber Rate Incidence

 

Computing Incidence

• Cumulative incidence requires complete

follow-up on all participants

• Person-time data is used to take full advantage

of available information in incidence rate

• Incidence rate often expressed as an integer

per multiple of participants over a specified

time

Incidence of CVD?

1 Disease-Free

2 CVD

3 Death

4 Disease-Free

5 CVD

0 5 10 Yrs Study Start

Incidence Rate

freediseasearepersonswhich

duringtimeoflengthstheofSum

period specified a during

diseasedevelop whopersonsofNumber

Rate Incidence

Incidence of CVD

Incidence = 2/(10+9+3+10+5) = 2/37

= 0.054

5.4 per 100 person-years

Example 3.2.

Computing Incidence

Develop CVD

Total Follow-Up Time (years)

Men 190 9984

Women 119 12153

Total 309 22137

Incidence Rate of CVD in Men = 190/9984 = 0.01903

= 190 per 10,000 person-years

Incidence Rate of CVD in Women = 119/12153 = 0.00979

= 98 per 10,000 person-years

Computing Incidence

Developed ILI Total Follow-Up Time (years)

<44 years 522 20,064

> 44 years 94 3,514

Total 616 23,578

Incidence Rate of ILI in <44 = 522/20064 = 0.0260

= 260 per 10,000 person-years

Incidence Rate of ILI in >44 = 94/3514 = 0.0268

= 268 per 10,000 person-years

Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Risk difference (excess risk)

unexposedexposed

unexposedexposed

unexposedexposed

Rate IncidenceRate Incidence

Incidence CumulativeIncidence Cumulative

PrevalencePrevalence







Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Risk difference of prevalent CVD in smokers versus

non-smokers

smokers-nonsmokers PrevalencePrevalence 

Free of CVD

History of CVD

Total

Non-Smoker 2757 298 3055

Current Smoker 663 81 744

3420 379 3799

= 81/744 – 298/3055 = 0.1089 – 0.0975 = 0.0114

Population Attributable Risk of CVD in

Smokers vs Non-Smokers

overall

smokers-nonoverall

Prevalence

PrevalencePrevalence  

Free of CVD

History of CVD

Total

Non-Smoker 2757 298 3055

Current Smoker 663 81 744

3420 379 3799

= (0.0998 – 0.0975) / 0.0998 = 0.023 = 2.3%

Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Risk difference of history of ILI in Males and Females in La Gloria

MalesFemales PrevalencePrevalence 

No ILI ILI Total

Males 517 260 777

Females 442 356 798

959 616 1575

= 356/798 - 260/777 = 0.4461 – 0.3346 = 0.1115

Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Relative risk

unexposed

exposed

Prevalence

Prevalence 

Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Relative risk of CVD in smokers versus non-smokers

smokers-non

smokers

Prevalence

Prevalence 

Free of CVD

History of CVD

Total

Non-Smoker 2757 298 3055

Current Smoker 663 81 744

3420 379 3799

= 0.1089/0.0975 = 1.12

Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Relative risk of ILI in females versus males

males

females

Prevalence

Prevalence 

No ILI ILI Total

Males 517 260 777

Females 442 356 798

959 616 1575

= 0.4461/0.3346 = 1.33

Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Odds ratio

)Prevalence(1

Prevalence

)Prevalence(1

Prevalence

unexposed

unexposed

exposed

exposed

 

Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Odds ratio of CVD in hypertensives versus non-

hypertensives

No CVD

CVD Total

Non-hypertensive 2754 188 2942

Hypertensive 659 181 840

3413 369 3782

04.4 932.0/068.0

725.0/275.0

)2942/881(1 188/2942

)840/181(1 181/840



 

Comparing Extent of Disease Between

Groups

• Odds ratio of ILI in younger group versus older group

Age No ILI ILI Total

<44 years 703 522 1225

> 44 years 256 94 350

Total 959 616 1575

02.2 731.0/269.0

574.0/426.0

)350/94(1 94/350

)1225/522(1 522/1225



 

Relative Risks and Odds Ratios

• Not possible to estimate relative risk in case-

control studies

• Can estimate odds ratio because of its

invariance property

Invariance Property of Odds Ratio

Cancer

(Case)

No Cancer (control)

Total

Smoker 40 29 69

Non-smoker 10 21 31

50 50 100

Case-control study to assess association between smoking and cancer

Invariance Property of Odds Ratio

Cancer

(Case)

No Cancer (control)

Total

Smoker 40 29 69

Non-smoker 10 21 31

50 50 100

Odds ratio for cancer in smokers versus non-smokers

= (40/29) / (10/21) = 2.90

Odds of smoking in patients with cancer versus not

= (40/10) / (29/21) = 2.90!