Chapter 3: Paying for Health Services
CHAPTER 3 Paying for Health Services
Basic insurance concepts
Third-party payers
Reimbursement (payment) approaches
Medicare payment methods
Impact of reimbursement approach on provider incentives and risk
Coding
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
For insurance to “work,” it must have these basic characteristics:
Pooling of losses
Payment only for random losses
Risk transfer
Indemnification
However, two problems often arise in insurance programs:
Adverse selection
Moral hazard
Insurance Concepts
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Adverse selection means those with greater risk are more likely to purchase insurance.
The problem exists because of asymmetric information.
Insurance companies use underwriting provisions to minimize adverse selection.
Cross-subsidies may exist among different groups.
Adverse Selection
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
There are two opposing positions that insurers can take regarding underwriting:
Community rating
Experience rating
Insurers also typically include preexisting condition clauses.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) sets national standards for underwriting:
Limits on preexisting conditions
Rights to purchase insurance
Consumer protection
Underwriting Provisions
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Moral hazard is the overuse of health services or forgoing of prevention because the individual does not bear the full cost of the consequences.
Insurers protect themselves by
deductibles,
copayment,
coinsurance,
stop-loss limits, and
policy restrictions.
Moral Hazard
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
For the most part, provider revenues come from third-party payers rather than from patients.
Private insurers:
Blue Cross/Blue Shield
Commercial insurers
Self-insurers
Public insurers:
Medicare
Medicaid
Third-Party Payers
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
MCOs combine insurance and provider functions.
Types of MCOs:
Health maintenance organizations (HMOs)
Provider panel
Gatekeeper
Preferred provider organizations (PPOs)
Less restrictive than HMOs
Various others
In general, MCOs attempt to limit utilization. Is this bad?
Managed Care Organizations (MCOs)
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Regardless of the payer, there are only a limited number of approaches to reimbursement (payment for services).
There are two broad categories:
Fee-for-service (FFS): Payment is tied to the amount of services provided:
Cost based
Charge based
Prospective payment
Capitation: Payment is tied to the patient population (number of enrollees).
Reimbursement Approaches
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Payer pays all allowable costs incurred in providing services.
Typically, periodic interim payments are made, with a final reconciliation at the end of each year.
Medicare used this method for hospital payment in its early years (1966–1983).
FFS: Cost-Based Reimbursement
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Payer pays billed charges for services rendered to covered patients.
Historically, all third-party payers paid for services on the basis of charges (chargemaster prices).
Some payers still use charges as the payment method but often negotiate a discount from full charges that usually ranges from 20 to 50 percent.
FFS: Charge-Based Reimbursement
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Prospective payment methods charge a fixed amount determined beforehand that is, at least in theory, unrelated to either costs or charges.
Prospective payment may be
per procedure,
per diagnosis (diagnosis-related group),
per diem (per day), or
bundled (global pricing) (episode of care).
FFS: Prospective Payment
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Capitation is different from FFS reimbursement.
Payment is not tied to utilization but rather to the number of covered lives.
Payment to providers usually is made on a per member per month (PMPM) basis.
It is used primarily by managed care organizations.
Capitation
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Many insurers are developing reimbursement methods that reward “performance.”
Most P4P plans provide extra amounts to providers that meet performance goals that are usually related to quality.
The idea is to incent providers to improve quality of care.
Do P4P plans benefit insurers?
Pay for Performance (P4P)
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) is designed to
reduce Medicare outlays,
provide cost-containment incentives, and
maintain quality of care.
Hospitals are paid a fixed amount per admission on the basis of diagnosis.
If cost is less than reimbursement, the hospital keeps the difference.
If cost is more than reimbursement, the hospital bears the loss.
Medicare Hospital Payments
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
IPPS payments are based on 334 base diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), which are further subdivided into 745 MS-DRGs based on complications. (MS stands for medical severity.)
Each MS-DRG has an assigned relative weight. The more complex the diagnosis and complications are, the higher the weight.
The DRG weight is then multiplied by an adjusted base rate (dollar amount for the hospital) to obtain the reimbursement amount.
Medicare Hospital Payments (cont.)
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Outlier payments:
Based on length of stay
Based on cost
Medical education payments
Bad-debt loss payments
Disproportionate share of low-income patients payments
Other IPPS Features
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
The Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) consists of a fixed payment amount for each outpatient visit.
There are 350 ambulatory payment classifications (APCs) for surgical and nonsurgical procedures, visits to clinics and emergency departments, and ancillary services.
Payment calculation is similar to that for inpatient services.
Medicare Outpatient Payments (Facility)
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Payments are made according to a resource-based relative value system with three components:
Physician work
Practice (overhead) expenses
Malpractice insurance expense
Roughly 8,000 procedures have been assigned relative value units (RVUs) for each of the three components.
The procedure RVU total is multiplied by a dollar conversion factor and geographic cost index to obtain the payment amount.
Medicare Physician Payments
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Cost-based reimbursement: maximizes costs (quality) and service quantity
Charge-based reimbursement: maximizes charges (price) and service quantity and minimizes costs
Per procedure: maximizes quantity of profitable procedures and minimizes cost per procedure
Provider Incentives (FFS)
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Per diagnosis: maximizes quantity of profitable cases and minimizes cost per case and up-coding
Per diem: maximizes length of stay (LOS) and minimizes cost per day
Global pricing: maximizes episodes of care and minimizes cost per episode
Provider Incentives (FFS) (cont.)
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Capitation changes the playing field for providers.
The incentive now is to
increase the number of covered lives, and
decrease the volume of services.
Remember that under FFS, the incentive is to increase the volume of services.
Provider Incentives (Capitation)
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Cost-based reimbursement: Risk is minimal.
Charge-based reimbursement: Discounts may drive reimbursement below costs.
Per procedure: Costs per procedure may exceed reimbursement.
Per diagnosis: Costs per admission may exceed reimbursement.
Provider Risks
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Per diem: Costs per day may exceed reimbursement.
Global pricing: Costs per episode of care may exceed reimbursement.
Capitation: Costs per member may exceed reimbursement. Here, provider costs are driven by both volume and cost of services.
Provider Risks (cont.)
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Different payers use different reimbursement methods, so providers face conflicting incentives and risks.
Prospective payment transfers cost risk from insurers to providers.
Capitation transfers both cost risk and volume (utilization) risk.
Risk cannot be avoided, so it must be managed.
Provider Risk Summary
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Coding is the first step in the reimbursement process.
Coding is performed by administrative personnel (coders) on the basis of clinicians’ notes.
Providers use two types of codes:
ICD codes
CPT codes
Coding
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are used to specify diseases, symptoms, and injuries.
The codes consist of three to five digits. The greater the number is, the more detailed the information. For example:
410 means heart attack.
410.0 specifies the anterior wall.
Hospitals use ICD codes to specify inpatient diagnoses.
ICD Codes
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes are used to specify medical procedures (treatments).
The codes consist of five digits. For example:
99211 is a simple (short) office visit.
99215 is a complex (long) office visit.
Physicians (and other clinicians) use CPT codes to specify procedures performed on patients.
CPT Codes
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›
This concludes our discussion of Chapter 3 (Paying for Health Services).
Although not all concepts were discussed, you are responsible for all of the material in the text.
Do you have any questions?
Conclusion
Copyright 2009 Health Administration Press
3 - ‹#›