SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

profilel3o0hd_s
Chapter2Iyerppts1.pptx

Managing Supply Chains: Concepts, Tools, Applications Chapter 2: Chain Structure

These powerpoints are a companion to the book: Managing Supply Chains: Concepts, Tools and Applications by Ananth. V . Iyer, Hercher Publishing Inc., ISBN 978-1-939297-01-3

1

1

Outline

Possible Chain Structures

Order Variability and the Bullwhip Effect

Risk Pooling

Optimizing Supply Chains

Applications

2

Standard Supply Chain Configurations

Chain

Assembly

3

Supply Chain Configurations

Distribution

Network

4

Order Variability in a serial chain (section 2.2)

Suppose node 1 faces a demand μ with a lead time L between successive steps and S period of safety stock

The base-stock (planned inventory position) is (L+S)μ for a node

If customer demand increases to μ+K, then node 1 increases its base-stock to (L+S) (μ+K)

The order placed with node 2 then becomes

(L+S)(μ+K)-((L+S)μ-μ-K) = μ+K+(L+S)K = μ+K(L+S+1)

Following this for successive nodes, the order placed by node n would be

μ+K(L+S+1)n

5

Bullwhip Effect

The increase in order size due to lack of information visibility is

(L+S+1)n

__________

((L+S)n+1)

6

Bullwhip Takeaways

Reducing chain length can decrease variability

Information or delivery delays increase this ratio

This increase in variability is called the Bull-Whip Effect and is related to supply chain structure

Examples – see next two slides

7

P&G Data showing order variability,Lee et al [80]

8

Order variability upstream, Lee et al[80]

9

Risk Pooling

n retailers sharing a common warehouse inventory, supply lead time of L

Each faces period demand with a mean μ and a variance of σ2

The common pool of inventory planned, given an instock probability of ser, is

(n L μ) +(Zser σ

10

Risk Pooling

If each location carried inventory separately, the required inventory would be

(n L μ) + (Zser n σ

Thus, the reduction in safety stock is proportional to

11

Risk Pooling takeaways

Consolidation warehouses can significantly decrease forecast error by pooling retail demand variability

Given more stable demand, suppliers can be chosen based on cost even if lead times are longer

The combined effect can be used to justify the benefit of a consolidation warehouse in a supply chain

12

Supply Networks

The network shows possible paths, and associated cost/unit, for product to go from the plant to the distribution center to the customer zones. Plant 2 is capacity constrained. The goal is to minimize total cost.

13

Formulating the problem (Section 15.1)

Decision Variables:

X(P1,W1) = flow from plant P1 to warehouse W1

X(P1,W2), X(P2,W1), X(P2,W2) defined similarly

X(W1,C1): flow from warehouse W1 to customer zone C1

X(W1,C2),X(W1,C3),X(W2,C1),X(W2,C2),X(W2,C3),

X(W3,C1),X(W3,C2),X(W3,C3) defined similarly

All variables are flows and hence >= 0

Constraints

X(P2,W1)+X(P2,W2) <= 60,000 (Plant 2 capacity constraint)

X(W1,C1)+X(W1,C2)+X(W1,C3)=X(P1,W1)+X(P2,W1)

Warehouse 1 outflows match inflows

X(W2,C1)+X(W2,C2)+X(W2,C3)=X(P1,W2)+X(P2,W2)

Warehouse 2 outflows match inflows

X(W1,C1)+X(W2,C1) = 50,000

X(W1,C2)+X(W2,C2)=100,000

X(W1,C3)+X(W2,C3)=50,000

These three constraints ensure that customer zone demands are satisfied by shipments from warehouses

Objective

The goal in selecting flows is to minimize total costs, described as

Minimize

(5 X(P1,W2))+(4 X(P2,W1))+(2 X(P2,W2))+(3 X(W1,C1))+(3 X(W1,C2))+(4 X(W1,C3))+(2 X(W2,C1))+(1 X(W2,C2))+(1 X(W2,C3))

An optimal solution a) needs to be feasible, b) should minimize the cost above.. Solution is illustrated using the Excel solver next.

Solution using Excel Solver

Please see the spreadsheets posted and watch the video for solution of this problem using the Excel Solver

Applications of the Solver Models

Section 2.10 describes use of a capacity configuration model at General Motors.

Decisions were the level of flexibility of capacity at each plant given unknown demand scenarios

While capacity had to be chosen, its deployment was after demand was revealed.

Capacity decisions were chosen to maximize profits subject to downside risk constraints.

Incorporating Global tax Impacts

Section 2.13 describes an application of a network model to leverage existing tax rules

The Digital Equipment Corp. example focused on choosing capacity and manufacturing decisions to leverage duty drawbacks for re-exports in the same or different condition and returns in a different condition

The result of such analysis may be production of some low margin items in more expensive locations that also have markets for high margin imports.

Chapter Summary

The supply chain structure can impact demand variability

Consolidation warehouses can improve performance by reducing inventories

Optimizing supply chain flows in response to changing demand and supply conditions is necessary to align supply and demand conditions profitably