ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide16.xml
Japanese print inspired in the way he handles the angle, above looking down. It is descriptive, and he doe not use accurate perspective. Like most of Degas’s works, it is an intimate, yet detached, portrayal of a woman taking a bath. Also, please note that this is a pastel drawing. Pastel is a colored chalk that was used by Impressionists since the technique of using it on rough drawing paper produced a soft, blurry line, much like what the artists were accomplishing in their paintings.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide16.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide17.xml
I love that this work follows Degas’s The Bath. Cassatt was an American who went to Paris to study painting and was close friend of Degas. She had her own distinct style and was influenced by Japanese prints. Mothers and children were favorite subjects of the artist as she was never a mother. Notice the multiple patterns and the angle in which she portrays her subjects. The influence of Japanese prints and Degas can particularly be seen here, especially in comparison with Degas’s work.Please watch: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/avant-garde-france/impressionism/v/mary-cassatt-the-child-s-bath-1893
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide17.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide18.xml
Japanese influences can be seen in the contrasting patterns on the wall and chair and in the woman’s dress. There is also a strong use of the diagonal and a skewing of perspective as we can see the scene from a couple of differing angles simultaneously (another thing Japanese woodcut artists would do). Cassatt was a master printmaker as well as painter.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide18.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide19.xml
Definitely Whistler’s most famous work, notice how it isn’t titled “Whistler’s Mother,” but Arrangement in Gray and Black No. 1. Whistler was from America and went to Paris for a brief period before settling in London. Some of his landscapes are reminiscent of J.M.W. Turner (see next slide). Whistler was vocal about paintings being just paintings and that artists shouldn’t be mere imitators, but innovators. This kind of attitude aligns him with the later abstract artists.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide19.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide20.xml
The Pre-Raphaelite critic, John Ruskin, criticized this painting and accused Whistler of “flinging a pot of paint into the public’s face.” Whistler sued Ruskin for libel, won his case, but went virtually bankrupt doing it and he doesn’t fully recover from this setback.Whistler’s goal as an artist was, like the Impressionists, to paint transience itself. The colors and light he captures are fleeting, just like this supposed explosion over water.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide20.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide21.xml
Toulouse-Lautrec reflected and influenced Art Nouveau with his expressive and descriptive use of line. He was a transitional figure between 19th century avant-garde and 20th century artists like Munch, Picasso, and Matisse. Toulouse-Lautrec was interested in Goya and Ingres, but was a disciple of Degas in the way he composed his works and in how he was a detached observer. Disfigured by weak bones, he was only 4 1/2 feet tall. The artist was from an aristocratic family who did not want him to become an artist. He is best known for his color lithographs, but was a painter in the decade prior to poster making. There is an overt use of garish colors set the tone for this painting. It’s casual, yet seedy. I call this the “absinthe” painting because of the green.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide21.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide22.xml
Brightly colored and stylized, everyone knew the artist at these dance halls. Jane Avril was a popular dancer and this poster is an advertisement for her. The linear quality and silhouetted shapes are part of the Art Nouveau aesthetic. Toulouse-Lautrec’s posters inspired other graphic designers throughout the West.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide22.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide23.xml
Post-Impressionism:1886 was the year of the last Impressionist exhibition and the movement spurred a wide range in approaches to artTake their art beyond the sensations of the optical world; to perceive reality through ideas, feelings, symbols and dreamsGeorge Seurat was affected by scientific theories and tried to apply them to his art: his artistic objective was to control the spectators response in a scientifically predictable way. The dot: a mathematical point of color – supports the perfectly controlled structure of his painting. This work is over 6 feet tall and 10 feet long. Seurat put in over 1 year of labor, making over 50 preparatory sketches. It was exhibited at the last Impressionist exhibition – was stunning and controversial. Divisionism: broke down color into primary and secondary groups. Seurat would put yellow and blue dots next to each other letting the viewers eye mix the two to make green, There is a luminous representation of light, it is spatially well organized, and mathematically precise. Seurat’s work is exemplary of the nineteenth century optimism that every aspect of culture could be reformed and reinterpreted by science. People believed human emotional responses could be predicted mathematically.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide23.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide24.xml
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide24.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide25.xml
Here you can see the blue and yellow dots next teach other. There’s no doubt that he uses some green as well, but when you are looking at the painting, those dots are no longer decipherable to the human eye.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide25.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide26.xml
Another work by Seurat that uses the same principles and techniques as the previous painting. His works are so precise and organized. Notice how the angles of the legs match the angle of the bass neck, the conductor’s baton, the way people are looking up.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide26.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide27.xml
Hands down, one of my favorite people, not just a favorite artist, Vincent van Gogh contributed much during his short ten-year career as an artist. Please read: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/gogh/hd_gogh.htm This painting is part of his first period as an artist, the Holland period which lasted from 1880-1886. A failed attempt at becoming a minister, Van Gogh wanted to help those less fortunate in his own way. He chose people who were humble and poor. This is an example of his sincerity and genuine love of humanity and concern for the poor. He was largely self-taught, thus his figures look cartoon-like. During this period he paints with very drab, neutral colors to emphasize the humbleness of his subjects.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide27.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide28.xml
One of three self-portraits I’ve included for lecture. I want you to look at all three portraits and think about the things that have remained the same and those that have changed from period to period. Think about how Van Gogh presents himself in each image. This portrait was painted when he was still in Holland.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide28.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide29.xml
Van Gogh’s second period was in Paris from 1886-1888. He moved to Paris on his brother Theo’s invitation. Theo was an art dealer who financially supported Vincent. It was in Paris where Vincent learned about the avant-garde and Impressionism - pretty easy to see that in this painting! Because of limited technology, images from the avant-garde had not left Paris – it was very insular at this point.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide29.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide30.xml
Van Gogh moved to Arles in southern France and lived there from 1888 until his death in 1890. It was the most productive part of van Gogh’s career: over 200 paintings in 2 years. His work is the most vibrant from this time.Van Gogh invited Paul Gauguin to live in Arles with him, but their personalities clashed and van Gogh started having seizures in December of 1888. This is the self-portrait he painted for Gauguin.Please watch: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/avant-garde-france/post-impressionism/v/vincent-van-gogh-self-portrait-dedicated-to-paul-gauguin-1888
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide30.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide31.xml
Always communicative about his art and feelings, Vincent wrote hundreds of letters to his brother Theo; that’s how we best know about van Gogh’s thoughts and moods. He painted how he felt about people and places. How do you think he felt about this place?
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide31.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide32.xml
After a psychotic episode, Van Gogh checked himself into St. Remy, a mental hospital in May 1889. He was suffering from epilepsy and most modern doctors believe that Vincent was also bipolar, may have been on the autism spectrum, and dealt with ADHD. This is his most famous work of art and was one of the first pieces of art purchased by the Museum of Modern Art in New York when it opened in 1929. Modern scientists have looked to this work as proof that Van Gogh understood the difficult theory of turbulence. Please watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMerSm2ToFYVan Gogh left St. Remy after little improvement and was under the care of Dr. Paul Gachet. To no avail, van Gogh’s condition worsened and the conventional story is that he killed himself by shooting himself in the stomach in July of 1890, but there is a theory that he was shot by someone else. He didn’t die immediately, but days after; it was an agonizing death.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide32.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout1.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout1.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout2.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout2.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout3.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout3.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout4.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout4.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout5.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout5.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout6.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout6.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout7.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout7.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout8.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout8.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout9.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout9.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout10.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout10.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout11.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout11.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout12.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout12.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout13.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout13.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout14.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout14.xml.rels
ppt/slideMasters/slideMaster1.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideMasters/_rels/slideMaster1.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide1.xml
Industrialization of Europe and U.S. about 1850
ppt/slides/_rels/slide1.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide2.xml
CLAUDE MONET, Terrace at Le Havre, 1867
ppt/slides/_rels/slide2.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide3.xml
Figure 23-2 CLAUDE MONET, Impression: Sunrise, 1872. Oil on canvas, 1’ 7 1/2” x 2’ 1 1/2”. Musée Marmottan, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide3.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide4.xml
Plein-air: An approach to painting much popular among the Impressionists, in which an artist sketches outdoors to achieve a quick impression of light, air, and color. The artist then takes the sketches to the studio for reworking into more finished works of art.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide4.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide5.xml
Figure 23-4 CLAUDE MONET, Saint-Lazare Train Station, 1877. Oil on canvas, 2’ 5 3/4” x 3’ 5”. Musée d’Orsay, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide5.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide6.xml
CLAUDE MONET, Haystack (Sunrise), 1890-91
ppt/slides/_rels/slide6.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide7.xml
CLAUDE MONET, Haystack (Sunset), 1890-91
ppt/slides/_rels/slide7.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide8.xml
Figure 23-3 CLAUDE MONET, Rouen Cathedral: The Portal (in Sun), 1894. Oil on canvas, 3’ 3 1/4” x 2’ 1 7/8”. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide8.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide9.xml
‹#›CLAUDE MONET, Rouen Cathedral (early morning), 1894
ppt/slides/_rels/slide9.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide10.xml
Figure 23-13A BERTHE MORISOT, Villa at the Seaside, 1874. Oil on canvas, approx. 1’ 7 3/4” x 2’ 1/8". Norton Simon Art Foundation, Los Angeles.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide10.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide11.xml
BERTHE MORISOT, In the Dining Room, 1886
ppt/slides/_rels/slide11.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide12.xml
Figure 23-7 PIERRE-AUGUSTE RENOIR, Le Moulin de la Galette, 1876. Oil on canvas, approx. 4’ 3” x 5’ 8”. Louvre, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide12.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide13.xml
PIERRE-AUGUSTE RENOIR, Luncheon of the Boating Party, 1881
ppt/slides/_rels/slide13.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide14.xml
Figure 23-1 ÉDOUARD MANET, Bar at the Folies-Bergère, 1882. Oil on canvas, approx. 3’ 1” x 4’ 3”. Courtauld Institute of Art Gallery, London.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide14.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide15.xml
Figure 23-8 EDGAR DEGAS, Ballet Rehearsal, 1874. Oil on canvas, 1’ 11” x 2’ 9”. Glasgow Museum, Glasgow (The Burrell Collection).
ppt/slides/_rels/slide15.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide16.xml
Figure 23-9 EDGAR DEGAS, The Tub, 1886. Pastel, 1’ 11 1/2” x 2’ 8 3/8”. Musée d’Orsay, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide16.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide17.xml
Figure 23-12 MARY CASSATT, The Bath, ca. 1892. Oil on canvas, 3’ 3” x 2’ 2”. The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide17.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide18.xml
MARY CASSATT, Maternal Caress, 1891
ppt/slides/_rels/slide18.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide19.xml
JAMES ABBOTT MCNEILL WHISTLER, Arrangement in Gray and Black No. 1 (The Artist’s Mother), 1871
ppt/slides/_rels/slide19.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide20.xml
‹#›Figure 23-11 JAMES ABBOTT MCNEILL WHISTLER, Nocturne in Black and Gold (The Falling Rocket), ca. 1875. Oil on panel, 1’ 11 5/8” x 1’ 6 1/2”. Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide20.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide21.xml
Figure 23-14 HENRI DE TOULOUSE-LAUTREC, At the Moulin Rouge, 1892–1895. Oil on canvas, approx. 4’ x 4’ 7”. The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide21.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide22.xml
Figure 23-14 HENRI DE TOULOUSE-LAUTREC, Jane Avril, 1893. Color lithograph, 4’ 2 1/2” x 3’ 1”. San Diego Museum of Art, San Diego (gift of the Baldwin M. Baldwin Foundation).
ppt/slides/_rels/slide22.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide23.xml
Figure 23-17 GEORGES SEURAT, A Sunday on La Grande Jatte, 1884–1886. Oil on canvas, approx. 6’ 9” x 10’. The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide23.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide24.xml
Pointilism: A system of painting devised by the 19th-century French painter Georges Seurat. The artist separates color into its component parts and then applies the component colors to the canvas in tiny dots (points). The image becomes comprehensible only from a distance, when the viewer’s eyes optically blend the pigment dots.