ART HISTORY ESSAY (no reference)

profileGHOST HAM
Chapter22Lecturept.1.pptx

ppt/theme/theme1.xml

ppt/theme/theme2.xml

ppt/notesMasters/notesMaster1.xml

ppt/notesMasters/_rels/notesMaster1.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide1.xml

Issues in contemporary 19th century society : Between 1839 and 1905 two things happen to painting: one was Academic painting that used perspective to create an art that imitated the optical realism of photography and the other was the avant-garde that broke with the perspective tradition and began to create new artistic languages and opened up new views of reality as new forms of art In the 19th century: The factory replaced the cathedral in European towns Workers or the proletariat served the factories that made the middle class wealthy The Industrial Revolution replaced the work of the craftsman and transformed the physical and social environment into one congenial to business and industry Important questions were raised about how to not become enslaved by machines and to preserve the human, emotional side of things

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide1.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide2.xml

David almost was executed because of his association with Robespierre and the Reign of Terror, but became the official propagandist for Napoleon. It is a very idealized portrait of Napoleon, as were most portraits of the emperor. Napoleon was known to go out to the front lines to help boost his troops’ morale. Indeed, Napoleon crossed this very treacherous mountain pass in the Alps with his troops, but he did not do it the way we see here - see the next image for how it really went down. If you look in the lower left corner, you can see Napoleon’s last name “Bonaparte” inscribed in the stone. There are two other names just barely readable inscribed on two adjacent stones: Hannibal and Charlemagne. Hannibal was the general from Carthage who defeated the Romans and brought elephants across the Alps. Charlemagne was the Frankish king who had a grand vision for Europe and became the first Holy Roman Emperor in 800. He is seen as the father of a modern Europe as he aligned the Frankish and Germanic peoples (the two biggest ethnic groups in Europe at the time) under the Christian religion. Napoleon drew parallels with the two leaders as he also thought of himself as a brilliant military leader and one who wanted to create a new French Empire across Europe (see the map). Regardless of his shortcomings, he was quite capable as a military commander and accomplished much in about 20 years time.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide2.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide3.xml

How Napoleon really crossed the Alps. No fanfare or fancy uniforms, no horse or wind whipping around him. He crossed the snowy Alpine pass on a mule with a guide. He looks miserable, doesn’t he? Paul Delaroche painted this in 1852, long after Napoleon was ousted from power in 1815 and by this point, Napoleon had died. It was safe to paint a more accurate representation of his crossing at this point.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide3.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide4.xml

One of the works David was commissioned for was The Coronation of Napoleon in Notre Dame. David was permitted to watch the event. He had plans of Notre Dame delivered and participants in the coronation came to his studio to pose individually, though never the Emperor (the only time David obtained a sitting from Napoleon had been in 1797). David did manage to get a private sitting with the Empress Josephine and Napoleon's sister, Caroline Murat, through the intervention of erstwhile art patron, Marshal Joachim Murat, the Emperor's brother-in-law. For his background, David had the choir of Notre Dame act as his fill-in characters. The Pope came to sit for the painting, and actually blessed David. Napoleon came to see the painter, stared at the canvas for an hour and said "David, I salute you". David had to redo several parts of the painting because of Napoleon's various whims, and for this painting, David received only 24,000 Francs which is $3909.04 in today’s U.S. dollars. Most artists in working at such a grand size would received triple that amount. Please visit the Louvre Museum here to read more: http://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/consecration-emperor-napoleon-and-coronation-empress-josephine-december-2-1804

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide4.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide5.xml

So you can get an idea of the scale of this painting, this is a friend of mine who is 5’2” in front of the painting. It is enormous.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide5.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide6.xml

At the Salon of 1804, Gros debuted this painting. The painting launched his career as a successful painter. It depicts Napoleon as he visits his own men in Jaffa (part of present-day Israel and Syria). He had just massacred the countries after losing an attempt to conquer Egypt and his men caught the plague. Opinions differ as to why he visited: whether it was to determine if he should leave his troops to die in Jaffa, or to boost morale. The painting is important for Gros because he shows Napoleon in a mostly positive light. He also showed an exotic setting and a recent event, which set him apart from his contemporaries. Please read here for more information about the Salon and European art academies: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/sara/hd_sara.htm

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide6.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide7.xml

Construction of La Madeleine was ordered by Napoleon and is in the form of a Roman temple reflecting the taste for classical architecture in Neoclassical France (modeled after the Mason Carrée, the best preserved of all Roman temples in France). It was supposed to be an honorary temple to the glory of Napoleon’s grand army, but after he was ousted from power in 1815, it became a church dedicated to St. Mary Magdalene. There are 52 Corinthian columns, each 40 feet high. On the pediment, there is a depiction of the Last Judgment. Some have criticized the design as the church is “clothed” in a pagan design. Vignon died before the completion of the structure, so the architect Jacques-Marie Huvé finished in 1842.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide7.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide8.xml

Ingres was trained by David, and he became the director of the Academy after 1815. An early work like this one reflects David’s influence as this is a story of classical mythology, but isn’t as successful an image as David’s heroic canvases. It is in this part of the story where Oedipus is solving the riddle: What walks on four legs in the morning, two legs in the afternoon, and three legs in the evening? If one failed to solve the riddle, they died - look in the lower left corner for a dead person’s foot and bones. The answer to the riddle is man.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide8.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide9.xml

This also reflects a somewhat different tendency in Ingres’s later work because it is a Romantic theme, but it isn’t rendered in a Romantic way – the woman doesn’t even look like an exotic foreigner. It is an oil painting depicting an odalisque, or concubine. Ingres' contemporaries considered the work to signify Ingres' break from Neoclassicism, indicating a shift toward exotic Romanticism. Grande Odalisque attracted wide criticism when it was first shown. It has been especially noted for the elongated proportions and lack of anatomical realism. The painting was commissioned by Napoleon's sister, Queen Caroline Murat of Naples, and finished in 1814. Ingres portrays a concubine in languid pose as seen from behind with distorted proportions. The small head, elongated limbs, and cool color scheme all reveal influences from Mannerists such as Parmigianino, whose Madonna with the Long Neck was also famous for anatomical distortion. This eclectic mix of styles, combining classical form with Romantic themes, prompted harsh criticism when it was first shown in 1814. Critics viewed Ingres as a rebel against the contemporary style of form and content. When the painting was first shown in the Salon of 1819, one critic remarked that the work had "neither bones nor muscle, neither blood, nor life, nor relief, indeed nothing that constitutes imitation". This echoed the general view that Ingres had disregarded anatomical realism. Ingres instead favored long lines to convey curvature and sensuality, as well as abundant, even light to tone down the volume. Ingres continued to be criticized for his work until the mid-1820s. Please watch: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/romanticism/romanticism-in-france/v/ingres-la-grande-odalisque-1814

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide9.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide10.xml

It is in portraits of the upper-middle class that Ingres would succeed, even though he hated painting portraits. Prior to Realism, portraits of aristocrats would be portrayed part of a mythological or historical scene. The new middle-class became the new kind of aristocracy that had to be classicized, but in a different way: Academic painting thus had the icon function of portraying the middle class as the heroic element maintaining the new social order. In this work, Louis Bertin, a conservative newspaper publisher, is portrayed as restless, a man with better things to do than sit for a portrait. He doesn’t even have time to comb his hair or button his shirt collar. Ingres is a master of capturing people’s essences.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide10.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide11.xml

Romanticism : Artists were becoming disillusioned with David’s use of art as propaganda for the state Napoleon was ousted out of power in 1815 and the French people restored a king to the throne; however, the idea and myth of individual freedom had achieved immense popularity which in turn inspired Romanticism Artists started to look inward for private visions to replace abandoned public expectation; the artist became a projector of his/her own subjectivity Romanticism = imagination; the word imagination was coined by the French poet and critic Charles Baudelaire; the subjectivity of the artist takes on a almost sacred character; the Romantic artist goes beyond the objectivity of facts to produce a new reality Romanticism is the first form of Western art that defines individual freedom as distinct from – and sometimes in opposition to – the prevailing institutions of society Romanticism was seen as a challenge to the politically dominant middle class; the bourgeoisie sided with Ingres and the Academy Although this is a much earlier work, it relates to the Romantic ideas of imagination. Fuseli was a Swiss-born painter who studied in Rome and was influenced by Michelangelo and Mannerist painters. He lived in England and was also influenced by medieval folklore. The demon represents the artist, the woman, his dream girl, and the horse is place in the scene as an erotic symbol. You will notice that Romantic artists use a looser brushstroke (like that of the Dutch 17th century artists) compared to the tight brushwork of the Neoclassical artists. The color and light is also often more dramatic as well. I often compare the tight perfection of Neoclassical art to that of the High Renaissance and the loose expressiveness of Romanticism to that of the Baroque.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide11.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide12.xml

Goya was a Spanish artist who ended up working for the royal courts of Spain and France. A serious illness in 1792 left Goya permanently deaf. Isolated from others by his deafness, he became increasingly occupied with the fantasies and inventions of his imagination and with critical and satirical observations of mankind. He evolved a bold, free new style close to caricature. In 1799 he published the Caprichos, a series of etchings satirizing human folly and weakness. His portraits became penetrating characterizations, revealing their subjects as Goya saw them. In his religious frescoes he employed a broad, free style and an earthy realism unprecedented in religious art. This image is the most famous as it states that when reason sleeps, corruption takes over. Please read: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/romanticism/romanticism-in-spain/a/goya-the-sleep-of-reason-produces-monsters

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide12.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide13.xml

Goya was the court painter to the king of Spain. He painted this unflattering portrait of the royal family. Too much inbreeding produced genetic anomalies including physical and mental disabilities and Goya wasn’t afraid to paint what he saw. Also, note that he is paying homage to Diego Velazquez’s Las Meniñas as he's standing behind a large canvas on the lefthand side of the painting.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide13.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide14.xml

Please watch: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/romanticism/romanticism-in-spain/v/goya-third-may

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide14.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide15.xml

After Goya was expelled from the Spanish court, he moved into a house called “Quinta del Sordo” or “country-house of the deaf man.” He was 72 years old. Goya painted a series of fourteen frescoes on the walls of the living and dining rooms of the house and they are known as “The Black Paintings” – he did not title his works, so this work was labeled with the title by art historians; the subject we see here is in reference to a myth from Greek mythology: Saturn, an allegorical representation of time, devours his children because he is fearful that one of them will dethrone him; the killing of his own sons symbolizes how time both creates and destroys.” Eventually, Saturn is undone by his son who becomes king of the gods. Goya himself had become “undone” by all that had happened during the Napoleonic invasion of Spain. Illness and exile contributed to his darker outlook on life which emerged during his later years. Seventy years after the frescoes were painted, the house’s owner decided to have them taken down and transferred to canvas due to their deteriorated condition. This is one of six works from the dining room.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide15.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide16.xml

This is the most famous and well received paintings done by Géricault, it is based on the real story of the ship called the Medusa that sank off the west coast of Africa. The Captain of the Medusa was an incompetent, a nobleman who owed his appointment to the ministerial favor and not seamanship. The captain and officers took the lifeboats and put the abandoned people left on a raft sixty five feet in length and twenty-eight feet wide out of the masts and beams, crudely lashed together before the Medusa sank by the ships carpenters. One hundred and fifty people, including one woman, were herded into the slippery beams. So closely were the people huddled together that it was impossible to move a single step. The rope between the lifeboats and the raft was cut letting the raft drift out into the Atlantic. Mutiny, murder, cannibalism and madness followed. After fifteen days, only fifteen people survived. Géricault interviewed survivors and had a replica of the raft built by the carpenter. He even went to the morgue to sketch the drowning victims. It was a success at the Salon of 1819 and took the painting to England, charged admission, and made a great deal of money.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide16.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide17.xml

An admirer of Géricault’s work, Delacroix would become the Neoclassical painter, Ingres’s, greatest opponent for about 25 years. In this work he illustrates the people’s revolt in 1830 that brought down the king who followed Napoleon. The figure in the center is representing Liberty, she is an allegorical figure, the embodiment of Liberty as she carries the French flag in one hand and a musket in the other. You can see people form all classes follow her in this revolt, even Delacroix himself: he’s the man on the left in the top hat with a gun.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide17.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide18.xml

The artist was inspired to paint pictures such as this after his visit to North Africa in 1832. He had visited harems which were the direct inspiration for this nude figure. It’s a great counterpoint to Ingres’s painting of the Grande Odalisque.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide18.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide19.xml

The brushstrokes are expressive and the subject matter is exotic, both elements are the hallmark of Romantic painting. The representation of movement and violence is reinforced here by the bright, intense lighting directed on to a few details selected for their significance, in particular the tiger and the fabrics of the clothes animated by the rapid gestures of the men who are attacking the wild beast. The determination of the horse rider, the terror of the horse, and the aggressiveness of the wild cat, bring the cruel game of hunting to fever pitch. This painting was shown in a retrospective exhibition of the painter's work at the 1889 Universal Exhibition (World’s Fair). It condenses all the elements of Delacroix's genius, his scientific use of colors, the freedom of his drawing and the glorified romanticism in his scenes of combat.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide19.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide20.xml

Friedrich was a German artist known for his eerily silent landscapes. Please watch: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/romanticism/romanticism-in-germany/v/caspar-david-friedrich-abbey-among-oak-trees-1809-or-1810

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide20.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide21.xml

Constable came from considerable wealth as his father was a rural landowner and many of Constable’s works are from these lands. This painting was done at the time when Constable’s fame was growing. It was exhibited in the Paris Salon in 1824 and it won a gold medal. It caused a stir among French critics who were astonished by its freshness. Constable portrayed the oneness with the nature that the Romantic poets sought. The relaxed figures are not observers, but participants in the landscape.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide21.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide22.xml

One of the most famous British artists and considered to be a great master of British art, Joseph Mallord William Turner was a painter, watercolourist and printmaker who lived and worked in the late 1700s and early 1800s. He is best known for his swirling, light-filled Romantic paintings of landscapes. J.M.W. Turner was both an artist of his time and a radical “modernist,” a practitioner of traditional styles of painting and a precursor of those to come many decades later. He was a robust personality and a sensitive observer of the events that shaped the world in his lifetime. This painting is based on an incident where an epidemic broke out on a slave ship, the captain commenced to throw his human cargo overboard since he was insured for a loss at sea, but not for disease. Turner paints with so much color and his brushstrokes are very loose – very impressionistic long before any artists were doing such techniques.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide22.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide23.xml

This image is for SmartHistory HW #9.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide23.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide24.xml

John Everett Millais, William Holman Hunt and Dante Gabriel Rossetti were the founding members of a group of artists called the Pre-Raphaelites formed in 1848. They rejected the art of the Renaissance in favor of art before Raphael, Michelangelo and Leonardo (15th-16th centuries). The Pre-Raphaelites focused on serious and significant subjects and were best known for painting subjects from modern life and literature often using historical costumes. They painted directly from nature itself, as truthfully as possible and with incredible attention to detail. They were inspired by the advice of John Ruskin, the English critic and art theorist in Modern Painters (1843-60). Rossetti’s inspiration for this painting was the Vita Nuova (New Life), the Italian poet Dante’s account of his idealized love for Beatrice, and of her premature death. The death of Beatrice is symbolized by a sudden spiritual transfiguration. A bird, a messenger of death, drops a white poppy between her open hands. The shadow of the sundial rests on the figure nine, the number Dante connects mystically with Beatrice and her death. In the background the shadowy figure of Dante gazes towards the figure of Love. Rossetti saw this work as a memorial to his wife, Elizabeth Siddall, who had died in 1862.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide24.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide25.xml

On October 16, 1834 a raging fire destroyed most of the old Palace of Westminster, leaving only the Great Hall (Westminster Hall), the Law courts to the west, and the cloister of St. Stephen. A competition in 1835 for the rebuilding stipulated either a Gothic or Elizabethan design for the new building. These styles were thought to be particularly British and well-suited for national public architecture. In addition, these styles related to the age and dignity of the British institution of parliament. Of 97 entries, all but six were Gothic in style. The winning design was by Barry, who may have preferred classical Renaissance designs, although he had also designed neo-Gothic buildings. Pugin, who looked back to the architecture of the medieval period for moral and spiritual examples, contributed the inventive Neo-Gothic details.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide25.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide26.xml

Architecture saw a Gothic revival during the Romantic era. In this building, the architect saw the mysterious East just as Romantic as the Gothic, so he combines the two to produce what would be called “a cream-puff version of the Taj Mahal,” the style known as Indian Gothic. Please watch this brief video: http://brightonmuseums.org.uk/royalpavilion/royal-pavilion/introduction/

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide26.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide27.xml

This is a modern photo of the library. This is a great example iron and glass construction which was not only used for interior strength for buildings, but as decorative elements as well. There was also a bit of a Renaissance Revival in architecture. The rounded arches and double barrel vaulted space are reminiscent of 15th century churches.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide27.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide28.xml

The Crystal Palace was made for the Great Exhibition in England in 1851 and constructed entirely out of iron and glass. It was 1851 feet long and spacious enough for nine cathedrals the size of Chartres. The Great Exhibition in essence was an industrial trade show meant to show the West’s superiority in machine made products. Unfortunately, the machine made products would be proved to be poorly made in comparison to hand made items from non-industrial countries. The structure was moved to Hyde Park a few years later which shows its genius of construction. Paxton designed the palace to have easily put together parts so that the structure could be taken down and reassembled somewhere else, like a giant kit.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide28.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide29.xml

Realism : A movement in France that developed around mid-century against this backdrop of an increasing emphasis on science; Realist artists argued that only the contemporary world - what people can see - was “real." Realists focused their attention on the people and events of their own time and disapproved of historical and fictional subjects on the grounds they were neither visible nor present and therefore were not real The Realist movement in French art flourished from about 1840 until the late nineteenth century. Realism emerged in the aftermath of the Revolution of 1848 that overturned the monarchy of Louis-Philippe and developed during the period of the Second Empire under Napoleon III. French society fought for democratic reform. The Realists democratized art by depicting modern subjects drawn from the everyday lives of the working class. Rejecting the idealized classicism of academic art and the exotic themes of Romanticism, Realism was based on direct observation of the modern world. In keeping with Gustave Courbet's statement in 1861 that "painting is an essentially concrete art and can only consist in the representation of real and existing things," Realists recorded in, often, gritty detail the present-day existence of humble people. This elevation of the working class into the realms of high art coincided with Pierre Proudhon's socialist philosophies and Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, which urged a proletarian uprising. Gustave Courbet was at the forefront of the Realist movement. He was decidedly anti-Academic, from a working class town, and identified with the common laborer. He had contempt for the bourgeoisie (the French middle-class) and wanted to challenge the ideals of the French Academy. This painting is objective and lacking emotion. It reveals the emptiness of the activity itself. Courbet presents the figures as passive victims of the industrial age.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide29.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide30.xml

Courbet is relatively unknown in 1851 when the Paris Salon presents his 22-foot-long painting, A Burial at Ornans . It is his first monumentally sized works. This portrayal of somber working-class citizens at a graveside in Courbet's home province generates an explosive reaction among the painter's audience and critics. With Burial at Ornans, many viewers reacted to the work as an assault on the very idea of what a painting should be. To sophisticated Parisians, rural people are considered a subject matter for small genre (scenes of everyday life) pieces; it's unprecedented to give them the kind of scope of French history paintings. With worker uprisings of 1848 a recent memory, Courbet's use of the common people as a grand subject is deemed a radical act. It is not only in the choice of subject that people took offense, but in the way he chose to present them. Courbet has intentionally painted these people in a manner that does not idealize their suffering. For one thing, there is no hierarchy in the composition; what I mean by that is that there are no people more important than others). It is an extremely democratic portrayal. They read Courbet's grieving figures as vulgar and ugly. One critic wrote, "He paints pictures as you black your boots." In this painting, we have mourners who attend a funeral from their province. They are shown very traditionally where men and women are separated. Many faces in the crowd are of Courbet’s friends and family. The church officials act disinterested while members of the deceased’s family grieve. The figures move past the open grave to pay their last respects; only a few people pause. Courbet’s work seems ordinary and that is precisely why it is so extraordinary. Courbet's choice of contemporary subject matter and his breaking of artistic convention was interpreted by some as an anti-authoritarian political threat. To achieve an honest and straightforward depiction of rural life, Courbet disposed of the idealized academic technique and employed a deliberately simple style, rooted in popular imagery, which seemed crude to many critics of the day. The exhibition makes Courbet famous, and he describes A Burial at Ornans as the "debut of my principles." Within a few years, he embraces Realism, a term originally used negatively by his critics. He writes that his purpose is to use art as a way toward self-knowledge, to "translate the customs, the ideas, the appearance of my epoch according to my own estimation; in a word, to create living art, that is my goal."

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide30.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide31.xml

Courbet is the figure on the right. Notice his clothing. It is rather plain and casual. This is a self-portrait identifying himself as an artist and letting the viewer know that others knew he was an artist as well. He was a self-proclaimed bohemian (not an attractive thing to be during this time) as Academy artists were not identified in this manner at all (recall how Delacroix looks in Liberty Leading the People ).

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide31.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide32.xml

Courbet’s works were rejected from the Paris World’s Fair in 1855 so he set up his own exhibit called “The Pavilion of Realism” – it evoked the fact that what the Academy had deemed as Realism was a sham. His work shows the split in the new industrial society that kept the poor from sharing the wealth and prosperity that the middle and upper classes were enjoying; in this painting, he used symbols in this work that would illustrate his rejection of Romanticism (plumed hat and guitar) and the Academy (rejected mannequin hung on the wall). The people in the work are real, not idealized. This work is a symbolic representation of Courbet’s life as an artist who was a social and moral force – as the avant-garde or out front in changing existing social and artistic values. The idea of the artist as a seer or originator of ideas, not one of an artist perpetuating accepted norms (the Academy).

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide32.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide33.xml

The lithograph made it possible for artists to create works very quickly and they were images that didn’t wear down as quickly in reproduction as did metal plates and woodblocks. The primary and best used application of lithography is for newspapers. Daumier’s works appeared in French newspapers and are the equivalent of our political cartoons today. He was thrown into jail many times for criticizing the government and exposed their stupidity and corruption. In this work he is showing the government as a large person who consumes everything the lower classes produce, including their money.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide33.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide34.xml

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide34.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide35.xml

Not only could Daumier create such tongue in cheek images like Gargantua , but he also made use of his art in a much more serious tone. In this particular work, Daumier is showing a dead family killed by police officers in a raid. The officers were looking for an assassin who they thought was in this family’s home and killed the innocent sleeping inhabitants inside. Daumier’s goal was to expose this instance of police brutality and to get people to take action against such acts. Since it was widely published in newspapers, it did affect change in the policy of the way police would handle such matters.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide35.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout1.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout1.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout2.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout2.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout3.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout3.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout4.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout4.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout5.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout5.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout6.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout6.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout7.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout7.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout8.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout8.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout9.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout9.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout10.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout10.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout11.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout11.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout12.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout12.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout13.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout13.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout14.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout14.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout15.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout15.xml.rels

ppt/slideMasters/slideMaster1.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideMasters/_rels/slideMaster1.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide1.xml

‹#› The Napoleonic Empire in 1815

ppt/slides/_rels/slide1.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide2.xml

‹#› Figure 22-2A JACQUES-LOUIS DAVID, Napoleon at the Great St. Bernard Pass, 1800

ppt/slides/_rels/slide2.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide3.xml

PAUL DELAROCHE, Bonaparte Crossing the Alps, 1852

ppt/slides/_rels/slide3.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide4.xml

Figure 22-3 JACQUES-LOUIS DAVID, The Coronation of Napoleon, 1805–1808. Oil on canvas, 20’ 4 1/2” x 32’ 1 3/4”. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide4.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide5.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide5.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide6.xml

Figure 22-5 ANTOINE-JEAN GROS, Napoleon at the Pesthouse at Jaffa, 1804. Oil on canvas, approx. 17’ 5” x 23’ 7”. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide6.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide7.xml

Figure 22-2 PIERRE VIGNON, La Madeleine, Paris, France, 1807–1842.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide7.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide8.xml

‹#› JEAN-AUGUSTE-DOMINIQUE INGRES, Oedipus Solving the Riddle of the Sphinx, 1808

ppt/slides/_rels/slide8.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide9.xml

Figure 22-8 JEAN-AUGUSTE-DOMINIQUE INGRES, Grande Odalisque, 1814. Oil on canvas, approx. 2’ 11” x 5’ 4”. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide9.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide10.xml

‹#› JEAN-AUGUSTE-DOMINIQUE INGRES, Louis Bertin, 1832

ppt/slides/_rels/slide10.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide11.xml

Figure 22-9 JOHN HENRY FUSELI, The Nightmare, 1781. Oil on canvas, 3’ 4” x 4’ 2”. The Detroit Institute of the Arts.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide11.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide12.xml

Figure 22-11 FRANCISCO GOYA, The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters, from Los Caprichos, ca. 1798. Etching and aquatint, 8 1/2” x 6”. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide12.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide13.xml

Figure 22-11A FRANCISCO GOYA, The Family of Charles IV, 1800. Oil on canvas, approx. 9’ 2” x 11’. Museo del Prado, Madrid.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide13.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide14.xml

Figure 22-12 FRANCISCO GOYA, The Third of May 1808, 1814. Oil on canvas, approx. 8’ 8” x 11’ 3”. Museo del Prado, Madrid.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide14.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide15.xml

Figure 22-13 FRANCISCO GOYA, Saturn Devouring One of His Children, 1819–1823. Detail of a detached fresco on canvas, full size approx. 4’ 9” x 2’ 8”. Museo del Prado, Madrid.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide15.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide16.xml

Figure 22-1 THÉODORE GÉRICAULT, Raft of the Medusa, 1818–1819. Oil on canvas, approx. 16’ x 23’. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide16.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide17.xml

Figure 22-16 EUGÈNE DELACROIX, Liberty Leading the People, 1830. Oil on canvas, approx. 8’ 6” x 10’ 8”. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide17.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide18.xml

EUGÈNE DELACROIX, Odalisque, 1845-50

ppt/slides/_rels/slide18.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide19.xml

Figure 22-16A EUGÈNE DELACROIX, Tiger Hunt, 1854. Oil on canvas, approx. 2’ 5” x 3’. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide19.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide20.xml

Figure 22-19 CASPAR DAVID FRIEDRICH, Abbey in the Oak Forest, 1810. Oil on canvas, 3' 7 1/2" X 5' 7 1/4". Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Staatliche Museen, Berlin.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide20.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide21.xml

Figure 22-21 JOHN CONSTABLE, The Haywain, 1821. Oil on canvas, 4’ 3” x 6’ 2”. National Gallery, London.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide21.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide22.xml

Figure 22-22 JOSEPH MALLORD WILLIAM TURNER, The Slave Ship (Slavers Throwing Overboard the Dead and Dying, Typhoon Coming On), 1840. Oil on canvas, 2’ 11 11/16” x 4’ 5/16”. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide22.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide23.xml

Figure 22-40 JOHN EVERETT MILLAIS, Ophelia, 1852. Oil on canvas, 2’ 6” x 3’ 8”. Tate Gallery, London.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide23.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide24.xml

‹#› Figure 22-41 DANTE GABRIEL ROSSETTI, Beata Beatrix, ca. 1863. Oil on canvas, 2’ 10” x 2’ 2”. Tate Gallery, London.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide24.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide25.xml

Figure 22-43 CHARLES BARRY and A. W. N. PUGIN, Houses of Parliament, London, England, designed 1835.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide25.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide26.xml

Figure 22-44 JOHN NASH, Royal Pavilion, Brighton, England, 1815–1818.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide26.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide27.xml

Figure 22-46 HENRI LABROUSTE, reading room of the Bibliothèque Sainte-Geneviève, Paris, France, 1843–1850.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide27.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide28.xml

Figure 22-47 JOSEPH PAXTON, Crystal Palace, London, England, 1850–1851. Photo from Victoria and Albert Museum, London.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide28.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide29.xml

Figure 22-26 GUSTAVE COURBET, The Stone Breakers, 1849. Oil on canvas, 5’ 3” x 8’ 6”. Formerly at Gemäldegalerie, Dresden (destroyed in 1945).

ppt/slides/_rels/slide29.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide30.xml

Figure 22-27 GUSTAVE COURBET, Burial at Ornans, 1849. Oil on canvas, approx. 10’ x 22’. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide30.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide31.xml

GUSTAVE COURBET, Bonjour Monsieur Courbet, 1854

ppt/slides/_rels/slide31.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide32.xml

GUSTAVE COURBET, The Painter’s Studio, 1854-55

ppt/slides/_rels/slide32.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide33.xml

HONORÉ DAUMIER, Gargantua, 1831

ppt/slides/_rels/slide33.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide34.xml

Lithography : A printmaking technique in which the artist uses an oil-based crayon to draw directly on a stone plate and then wipes water onto the stone. When ink is rolled onto the plate, it adheres only to the drawing. The print produced by this method is a lithograph.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide34.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide35.xml

Figure 22-29 HONORÉ DAUMIER, Rue Transnonain, 1834. Lithograph, approx. 1’ x 1’ 5 1/2”. Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide35.xml.rels

ppt/presProps.xml

ppt/presentation.xml

ppt/_rels/presentation.xml.rels

_rels/.rels

ppt/media/image3.jpg

ppt/media/image8.jpg

ppt/media/image20.jpg

ppt/fonts/GillSans-regular.fntdata

ppt/media/image4.jpg

ppt/media/image16.jpg

ppt/media/image33.png

ppt/media/image18.jpg

ppt/media/image30.jpg

ppt/media/image2.jpg

ppt/media/image29.png

ppt/media/image22.jpg

ppt/media/image21.jpg

ppt/media/image12.png

ppt/media/image26.jpg

ppt/media/image25.png

ppt/media/image7.jpg

ppt/media/image13.jpg

ppt/media/image17.jpg

ppt/media/image34.png

ppt/media/image1.png

ppt/media/image23.jpg

ppt/media/image28.png

ppt/media/image27.jpg

ppt/media/image10.jpg

ppt/media/image31.png

ppt/media/image14.jpg

ppt/media/image6.jpg

ppt/media/image24.jpg

ppt/media/image9.jpg

ppt/media/image11.jpg

ppt/fonts/GillSans-bold.fntdata

ppt/media/image32.png

ppt/media/image19.jpg

ppt/media/image5.jpg

ppt/media/image15.jpg

[Content_Types].xml