ART HISTORY ESSAY (no reference)
ppt/theme/theme1.xml
ppt/theme/theme2.xml
ppt/notesMasters/notesMaster1.xml
ppt/notesMasters/_rels/notesMaster1.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide1.xml
Flanders and Holland: Flemish and Dutch artists painted pictures that illuminate the emerging forces of capitalism, technology, and middle class political democracy which revealed the modern sense of individualism Flemish and Dutch artists made portraits, still-lifes, landscapes and genre scenes (scenes of everyday life); these kinds of paintings were sold to individuals on an open market at shops, studios, and fairs Use of the microscope was pioneered by the Dutch – they were the best lens makers of Europe; this kind of minute observation led to the creation of the camera obscura
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide1.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide2.xml
Rubens was born in Antwerp in 1577 to Protestant parents, but his father fled to Germany from Spanish persecution (Flanders was controlled by Catholic Spain). When his father died, Rubens was 10, he was raised as a devout Catholic in Flanders. He was trained by local painters, became a master in 1598, then moved to Italy in 1600 where he spent 8 years. He went back to Antwerp and became a Spanish court painter. This commission was his first major altarpiece done after his return from Italy: done in a traditionally Flemish manner paying close attention to natural landscape elements while his figures are muscular and dynamic, something he picked up from Italy. There is a pyramidal structure which draws the viewer into the action.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide2.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide3.xml
Rubens was a favorite among aristocrats, especially Marie de’Medici. She was a widow of Henry IV (and a member of the famous Florentine family), she commissioned Rubens to paint 21 paintings glorifying her career. This shows her arriving from a sea voyage from Italy, she is welcomed by her ladies in waiting and allegorical (an allegory is the physical embodiment of an idea or an ideal) figures including the personification of France and the sky and sea rejoice at her arrival. Please note how the mythological female sea creatures at the bottom of the painting are full figured. They look very different than the elite women pictured above. Rubens used the idealized form for a woman meant to symbolize fertility and fecundity.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide3.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide4.xml
An important pioneer in the field of still-life painting, Clara Peeters is the only Flemish woman known to have specialized in such pictures as early as the first decade of the 17th century. While definite details concerning her life are scarce, records indicate that Peeters was baptized in Antwerp in 1594 and married there in 1639. There is no indication that Peeters ever joined the Antwerp painters' guild, but the records for many relevant years are missing. Peeters's earliest dated oil paintings, from 1607 and 1608, are small-scale, detailed images representing food and beverages. The skill with which this 17-year-old artist executed such pictures indicates that she must have been trained by a master painter. Although there is no documentary evidence of her artistic education, scholars believe that Peeters was a student of Osias Beert, a noted still-life painter from Antwerp. By 1612 the 18-year-old artist was producing large numbers of painstakingly rendered still lifes, typically displaying a group of valuable objects (elaborately decorated metal goblets, gold coins, exotic flowers) on a narrow ledge, as seen from a low vantage point, against a dark background.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide4.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide5.xml
Although the artist was tremendously affected by Caravaggio’s painting of the same scene, he gets rid of the tenebrism of Caravaggio and instead uses a palette of soft colors and works much more with light. He also crams his figures into a much smaller space which gives the painting an immediacy to it. Because Caravaggio is known for that kind of immediacy, I usually say that Brugghen out-Caravaggios Caravaggio.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide5.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide6.xml
Honthorst set a precedent for similar scenes done in the 1620s in Utrecht where artists favored the erotic and ascetic side of Baroque art. The artist used multiple hidden light sources to heighten the dramatic contrast of lights and darks. The large dark figure in the foreground makes the other characters behind him recede into space creating depth. This is a scene of upper class individuals. It’s not their clothing, jewelry, instruments, or table full of food that tells us this, but, rather, we know this because oil lamps and candles were expensive. Most people went to bed at sundown, but these people are up late eating and laughing the night away.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide6.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide7.xml
As a leading painter in Haarlem, portraits were his specialty. Hals excelled at group portraits especially. These men were a group of Dutch civic militia groups who claimed credit for liberating the Dutch Republic from Spain. Here they have met for a feast celebrating their patron saint, Hadrian. Since most of these feast could last for days to a week, Hals was able to portray everyone in a variety of manners and poses which makes the painting much more naturalistic and less rigid. Hals was a fan of the looser brushstroke which enlivens the surface of the painting. You may recall that Diego Velázquez also used looser brushwork in Las Meniñas . Some people liked this technique, while others thought it was sloppy.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide7.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide8.xml
My favorite portrait by Hals, but not found in your book. His single portraits gave an individuality to the sitter. Malle Babbe was supposedly half witch (aka healer/, half village idiot, Hals captures the essence of this figure as she yells and laughs at other guests in a tavern. She’s drinking that stein of ale in her hand, not serving it! What I love so much about this portrait is that she would never be able to afford a portrait painted by the esteemed artist. Hals saw something in her that was interesting and decided to paint her. The looseness of the brushwork is genius. You really get a sense of her personality.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide8.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide9.xml
These women are widows (you can tell by the black dresses they wear) who supervise a charitable organization, a home for the aged - they also were supervisors for orphanages, hospitals, and prisons. They are characterized as being stern, composed, and puritanical, living out their lives in the service of the less fortunate. They took their jobs very seriously. These well-educated women were often found populating the work force, but often they dedicated their time to being regents when their finances afforded them to do that. Even though this is a group portrait, you get a sense of their individual personalities. Hals focuses on their faces and hands. Their body language tells us a lot about what kinds of roles they might play in the old men’s home.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide9.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide10.xml
Leyster was a follower of Hals; we can see this in the way she uses a loose brushstroke throughout the painting. Her career was partially cut short because of motherhood as women often couldn’t sustain a career as an artist and be a wife and mother. Like Artemesia Gentileschi, Leyster portrays herself first and foremost as an artist, but unlike Gentileschi’s self-portrait, the artist pauses a moment to look at us while she is painting someone else’s portrait. If you haven’t noticed already, almost all of the self-portraits done by women artists are of them at work. This was so that male artists and patrons would take them seriously. Leyster ran a studio where she taught students. Frans Hals stole one of her students and Leyster sued him for lost income and won. This demonstrates the competitive nature of artists striving to make a living in a Protestant nation. There are no more church patrons since the Protestants believed images were idolatrous. Private patronage or selling works in the open market was how artists made money. Many of them, like Leyster and Hals, also taught to make money, not much different than today.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide10.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide11.xml
This is another work to see Leyster’s skill as a genre painter. The light is really quite stunning and is similar to that of Velázquez and to the next artist, Jan Vermeer.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide11.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide12.xml
A landscape of his native town, Vermeer’s work fuses the objective perspective of the lens (a camera obscura* ) with the creative perspective of the human eye. He only painted 2 or 3 paintings a year and wasn’t interested in selling his work. By the early 1660s he focused on two enduring and personal themes: the portrayal of light and of women in meditatively quiet interiors. Vermeer was Catholic and lived with his wife and many children in a Catholic neighborhood in Delft. Holland was quite religiously tolerant. Because Vermeer painted maybe 40-45 works of art in his entire career, he was forgotten until rediscovered in the 19th century. *The camera obscura aided artists by projecting images through a hole onto a glass plate; the kind used by the 17th century Dutch used a mirror to re-invert the image to the right side up, like a camera without film; it performs two important skills: 1) it reduced the size of an image to a convenient scale and 2) it framed a two-dimensional image on the glass viewing plate making it easy for the artist to study or trace images
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide12.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide13.xml
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide13.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide14.xml
Because Vermeer was Catholic, he often added symbolic references in his work, including the painting of the Last Judgment behind the woman. It’s a painting he painted and used as a prop. The woman seems to be doing an ordinary task, figuring out the value of her jewels. Notice, though, that the balance (or scales) she holds can be symbolic of the scales found in the Last Judgment scene, weight the souls of the saved and the damned. She may be pondering more than just the value of her worldly goods. Vermeer was not highly regarded in his time because the emotion in his works was buried too deeply; it was not surface enough for the Baroque public. Indeed it is very different than the work of Rembrandt or Caravaggio.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide14.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide15.xml
Most likely Vermeer’s daughter, this painting has been the centerpiece for a popular work of fiction that was made into the film of the same name starring Scarlett Johanssen. Optional - please watch the making of The Girl with the Pearl Earring : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTw_0uuvens
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide15.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide16.xml
Rembrandt is generally regarded as one of the greatest painters and printmakers in history (6000 paintings, 300 etchings and 2000 drawings). He had early success, a bumpy mid-life and poor later life. This is Rembrandt’s first group portrait. It is of the physician Nicolaes Tulp and seven surgeons. It is one of a series of group portraits that were made for the board room of the Guild of Surgeons. Dr. Tulp demonstrates how the muscles of the arm are attached. The bodies used for these public autopsies were criminals. The names of the men portrayed in the picture are listed on the piece of paper held by the man in the back. What is remarkable about this painting is the way Rembrandt uses light. The light on the cadaver is odd since we can’t really tell where it’s coming from, it almost seems to be coming from the body itself. Perhaps this is representing the idea of the light of science. During Leonardo’s time, these kind of scientific inquiries were illegal. Now, in the 17th century in a Protestant country, these kinds of activities were a part of everyday society.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide16.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide17.xml
One of his most famous works, it is an untraditional group portrait in which each member of this military group paid to have his portrait painted. Rembrandt plays with chiaroscuro and movement, thus obscuring some of the “sitters” faces. However, the work was not originally this dark, the varnish that Rembrandt used has darkened over time, thus the nickname “the Night Watch” was given to the painting. Please watch: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/monarchy-enlightenment/baroque-art1/holland/v/rembrandt-nightwatch And for fun: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1ys2UCROU0
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide17.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide18.xml
Rembrandt made a very steady income in selling prints. This was such a popular work that Rembrandt had to pay 100 guilders (150 gold pieces) for a copy of his own print. It is a depiction of the Gospel Matthew chapter 19. Christ is preaching to the blind, lame, and young. Peter tries to stop a few women who want to have their children blessed but Jesus gestures that they should come closer: “Suffer the little children, and forbid them not, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” while Jewish Pharisees (symbolizing “the law”, while Jesus symbolizes “the spirit”) on the left are discussing issues among themselves, trying to “trip” Jesus’s theology up. It is dramatically lit and reverent. The young man sitting next to Peter has just been told that unless he gives up his worldly riches to the poor, he will not get into heaven: “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of the needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” Quick side note: “the eye of the needle” does not refer to the eye in a sewing needle, but instead refers to the entry gate into a walled city. All cities had fortified walls for protection and the entry gates were nicknamed “the eye of the needle.” If you had a camel with too much stuff on its back, it couldn’t pass through the eye of the needle or the entry gate. Notice the camel in the right part of the print. This entire work is of a Protestant message that it is not through obedience to the law or good works, but by faith that one shall be saved.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide18.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide19.xml
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide19.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide20.xml
This is the image for SmartHistory HW #7.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide20.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide21.xml
Claesz produced many still life images. They distilled a richness and mystery that captured the light of everyday objects. This also shows the passing of time that became to be known as vanitas : reminders of the transience of temporal or mortal life. It is often symbolized by watches, half eaten food, dying plants, burned down candles, half-empty glasses, skulls, etc.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide21.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide22.xml
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide22.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide23.xml
Floral painting was a very popular form of still-life art. Ruysch was leading practitioner of this genre. She gained knowledge of flowers and insects from her father who was a professor of botany and anatomy. Her flowers are positioned in a way that they create a diagonal from bottom left to upper right, opposite of the diagonal of the table they rest upon. Ruysch was supported by her parents to pursue a career as an artist. Compositions such as these were completely made up from her imagination as these flowers all bloomed at different times of year. Notice how they are in different stages of bloom and decay. She places bees, butterflies, and shells in the composition to illustrate the passage of time.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide23.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide24.xml
There was a renewed interest in the classical especially after 1640. Poussin was the greatest French painter in the 17th century and the earliest French painter to receive international fame, although he spent most of his career in Rome. He is a precursor to Neo-Classicism of the 18th century, painting in what is called the “Grand Manner.” Figures are derived from Hellenistic sculpture (in the sense of movement especially). Poussin believed in idealizing nature to make it perfect. This image depicts three shepherds and a monumental, statue-like woman grouped around a large stone tomb. The idyllic natural setting, the antique robes and sandals of the figures, and, of course, the painting's title all situate this in the mythical realm of Arcadia. Arcadia was a real region in Greece: isolated, surrounded by mountains, and sparsely populated by shepherds, already in antiquity the region was romanticized as a kind of terrestrial paradise, a place of unspoiled nature whose inhabitants still lived in the blissful harmony (and ignorance) of the Golden Age. The myth of Arcadia has inspired poets and artists alike through the millennia, notably the Roman poet Virgil, whose Eclogues (a series of poems which take place in Arcadia) were one of the major inspirations for this painting. In the midst of this paradise, however, these shepherds look somewhat concerned. What is it that they are examining with such perplexed intensity? A tomb, with the phrase Et in Arcadia Ego inscribed in the center. This Latin phrase roughly translates into English as "Even in Arcadia I exist," referring to the contents of the tomb: death. These shepherds are thus discovering their own mortality. Poussin's painting can be qualified as a memento mori , or reminder of death. The subject of The Arcadian Shepherds as such was rare and esoteric, but at least one important painting preceded Poussin's masterpiece. These shepherds are no longer happily frolicking in their Golden Age of bliss, but instead gaze at the tomb, broken-hearted, the knowledge of their mortality weighing heavily upon their shoulders.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide24.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide25.xml
There are no morals or dramatic stories to be told here like in Poussin’s work. His painting seems to have been done just to celebrate landscape as it is. Lorrain loved hazy atmosphere and soft and glowing scenes. It is an ideal world where the figures on the right chat away in an animated fashion, the cattle on the left rest or lazily munch grass. The artist studied the changing qualities of light and its affect on atmosphere and landscape.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide25.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide26.xml
Callot was one of the first artists to practice the graphic arts (printmaking) exclusively. His innovative series of prints documenting the horrors of war greatly influenced the socially conscious artist of the 19th and 20th centuries. This print depicts that under King Louis XIII, the Dukedom of Lorraine was invaded and its capital, Nancy was attacked. This was part of the process of securing an absolute monarchy by the King of France, a consolidation of power continued by Louis XIV. The countryside was overrun, pillaged and burned by marauding French soldiers and this work shows the fate of some of those who had tried to defend their land. The inscription beneath it reads: “finally these infamous and abandoned thieves hanging from this tree like wretched fruit show that crime (horrible and black species) is itself the instrument of shame and vengeance and that is the fate of corrupt men to experience the justice of heaven sooner or later.” Callot is commenting on the effects of the invasion and the violence; the soldiers are depicted as either ruthless perpetrators, or themselves victims.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide26.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide27.xml
La Tour's early training is still a matter for speculation, but in the province of Lorraine he encountered the artist Jean Le Clerc, a follower of the Italian painter Caravaggio. From this source likely came La Tour's concern with simplicity, realism, and essential detail. La Tour followed in the footsteps of Caravaggio in his lighting, but chooses much quieter, contemplative scenes. Notice like Gerrit Van Honthorst, he uses a hidden light source to add drama. It is intimate and quiet, a moment for the viewer to also adore the newborn Christ.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide27.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide28.xml
Date to remember : Royal Academy in France was founded in 1648. Charles Lebrun, the court painter (Louis XIV’s artistic supervisor) became the director in 1663: he established a rigid curriculum of instruction in practice and theory, based on a system of rules; this set the pattern for all later academies, including today’s art schools. This is a very suitable portrait of the 63-year-old “Sun King” (called this for parallels between him and the Greek god, Apollo). Louis XIV had the longest reign in European history and still holds that record today. Everything about this portrait exudes class and what it means to be royal. Louis is showing off his legs as he felt it was his best feature - he was a ballet dancer as well. Louis XIV was a very eccentric man. He wears the ermine fur cape complete with the symbol of the French aristocracy, the fleur-de-lis, holds a scepter in his hand, crown on the footstool (let’s face it, who would want to give that perfectly coiffed wig hat hair?!), and sword at his side (even though he’d never see battle). The curtain is drawn back to reveal the grand hall beyond. This is definitely my favorite portrait of a monarch.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide28.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide29.xml
About 20 miles from Paris, this is the palace of Louis XIV. Louis was more interested in how the interior would suit his elaborate tastes than how the palace looked from the outside (see next slide). He turned to Lebrun, a painter who became supervisor of all the king’s artistic projects. It was started by Louis Le Vau, but he died within the first year of building, then the project fell under Jules Hardouin-Mansart’s direction. Versailles has the largest formal gardens ever created.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide29.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide30.xml
This illustrates the extravagance of Louis XIV’s style, taste, and wealth. There are 357 mirrors total. This hall faces the gardens so all the natural light bounces off the Venetian mirrors on the other side. On one side of the hallway there is a salon (a sitting or living room) of war, the other side, a salon of peace. The gilding, parquet floors, crystal, painting, marble - all so extravagant! The upkeep and maintenance has been estimated to have cost 6-25% of the total income of France (the GDP [gross domestic product]). The palace itself is worth as little as $2 billion in today’s dollars, possibly $13 billion dollars in today’s money (depends on a discrepancy in the money used during the 17th century). Is there any question as to why the French revolted against the aristocracy?
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide30.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide31.xml
Versailles wasn’t the only architectural project being constructed during Louis XIV’s reign. This church is attached to the veteran’s hospital Louis XIV built for the disabled soldiers of his many wars. The exterior of the church is idealized to give significance to the dome. The façade is low and narrow in relation to the vast drum and dome. The overpowering dome is itself expressive of the Italian Baroque love of dramatic magnitude.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide31.xml.rels
ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide32.xml
Wren was a Renaissance man of the Baroque/Rococo period as he studied anatomy, physics, mathematics, and astronomy; he was highly regarded by Isaac Newton. There was a great fire in 1666 in London that destroyed the Gothic St. Paul’s and Wren was appointed to the royal commission for rebuilding the city. Up until this point, England had not participated in the architectural styles popular during the Renaissance and the Baroque, instead sticking with a native Tudor style. There are many classical elements, influence of St. Peter’s in Rome (dome, esp.) and the two clock towers really contain Baroque elements in their shape and decoration.
ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide32.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout1.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout1.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout2.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout2.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout3.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout3.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout4.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout4.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout5.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout5.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout6.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout6.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout7.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout7.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout8.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout8.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout9.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout9.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout10.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout10.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout11.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout11.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout12.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout12.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout13.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout13.xml.rels
ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout14.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout14.xml.rels
ppt/slideMasters/slideMaster1.xml
‹#›
ppt/slideMasters/_rels/slideMaster1.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide1.xml
Northern Europe 1600-1700
ppt/slides/_rels/slide1.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide2.xml
Figure 20-2 PETER PAUL RUBENS, Elevation of the Cross, Antwerp Cathedral, Antwerp, Belgium, 1610. Oil on panel, 15’ 1 7/8” x 11’ 1 1/2” (center panel), 15' 1 7/8" x 4' 11" (each wing).
ppt/slides/_rels/slide2.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide3.xml
‹#› Figure 20-4 PETER PAUL RUBENS, Arrival of Marie de’ Medici at Marseilles, 1622–1625. Oil on canvas, approx. 5’ 1” x 3’ 9 1/2”. Louvre, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide3.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide4.xml
Figure 20-6 CLARA PEETERS. Still Life with Flowers, Goblet, Dried Fruit, and Pretzels, 1611. Oil on panel, 1’ 7 3/4” x 2’ 1 1/4”. Museo del Prado, Madrid.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide4.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide5.xml
Figure 20-7 HENDRICK TER BRUGGHEN, Calling of Saint Matthew, 1621. Oil on canvas, 3’ 4” x 4’ 6”. Centraal Museum, Utrecht (acquired with the aid of the Rembrandt Society).
ppt/slides/_rels/slide5.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide6.xml
Figure 20-8 GERRIT VAN HONTHORST, Supper Party, 1620. Oil on canvas, approx. 7’ x 4’ 8”. Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide6.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide7.xml
Figure 20-10 FRANS HALS, Archers of Saint Hadrian, ca. 1633. Oil on canvas, approx. 6’ 9” x 11’. Frans Halsmuseum, Haarlem.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide7.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide8.xml
‹#› FRANS HALS, Malle Babbe, ca. 1650
ppt/slides/_rels/slide8.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide9.xml
Figure 20-9 FRANS HALS, The Women Regents of the Old Men’s Home at Haarlem, 1664. Oil on canvas, 5’ 7” x 8’ 2”. Frans Halsmuseum, Haarlem.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide9.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide10.xml
Figure 20-11 JUDITH LEYSTER, Self-Portrait, ca. 1630. Oil on canvas, 2’ 5 3/8” x 2’ 1 5/8”. National Gallery of Art, Washington.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide10.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide11.xml
‹#› JUDITH LEYSTER, Boy Playing a Flute, 1630-35
ppt/slides/_rels/slide11.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide12.xml
Figure 20-18B JAN VERMEER, View of Delft, ca.1661
ppt/slides/_rels/slide12.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide13.xml
Camera obscura : Latin, “dark room”. An ancestor of the modern camera in which a tiny pinhole, acting as a lens, projects an image on a screen, the wall of a room, or the ground-glass wall of a box.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide13.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide14.xml
‹#› Figure 20-19 JAN VERMEER, Woman Holding a Balance, ca.1664. Oil on canvas, 1’ 3 5/8” x 1’ 2”. National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide14.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide15.xml
JAN VERMEER, Girl with the Pearl Earring, ca. 1665
ppt/slides/_rels/slide15.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide16.xml
Figure 20-12 REMBRANDT VAN RIJN, Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp, 1632. Oil on canvas, 5’ 3 3/4” x 7’ 1 1/4”. Mauritshuis, The Hague.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide16.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide17.xml
Figure 20-13 REMBRANDT VAN RIJN, The Company of Captain Frans Banning Cocq (Night Watch), 1642. Oil on canvas, 11’ 11” x 14’ 4”. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide17.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide18.xml
Figure 20-16 REMBRANDT VAN RIJN, Christ with the Sick around Him, Receiving the Children (Hundred Guilder Print), ca. 1649. Etching, approx. 11” x 1’ 3 1/4”. Pierpont Morgan Library, New York.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide18.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide19.xml
Etching : A kind of engraving in which the design is incised in a layer of wax or varnish on a metal plate. The parts of the plate left exposed are then etched (slightly eaten away) by the acid in which the plate is immersed after incising.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide19.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide20.xml
‹#› Figure 20-15 REMBRANDT VAN RIJN, Self-Portrait, ca. 1659–1660. Oil on canvas, approx. 3’ 8 3/4” x 3’ 1”. The Iveagh Bequest, Kenwood House, London.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide20.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide21.xml
Figure 20-21 PIETER CLAESZ, Vanitas Still Life, 1630s. Oil on panel, 1’ 2” x 1’ 11 1/2”. Germanisches Nationalmuseum, Nuremberg.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide21.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide22.xml
Vanitas : Latin, “vanity”. A term describing paintings (particularly 17th century Dutch still lifes) that include a reference to death.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide22.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide23.xml
‹#› Figure 20-23 RACHEL RUYSCH, Flower Still Life, after 1700. Oil on canvas, 2’ 6” x 2’. The Toledo Museum of Art, Toledo, Ohio.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide23.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide24.xml
Figure 20-31 NICOLAS POUSSIN, Et in Arcadia Ego, ca. 1655. Oil on canvas, approx. 2’ 10” x 4’. Louvre, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide24.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide25.xml
Figure 20-33 CLAUDE LORRAIN, Landscape with Cattle and Peasants, 1629. Oil on canvas, 3’ 6” x 4’ 10 1/2”. Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide25.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide26.xml
Figure 20-35 JACQUES CALLOT, Hanging Tree, from the Large Miseries of War series, 1633. Etching, 3 3/4” x 7 1/4”. Bibiliothèque Nationale, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide26.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide27.xml
Figure 20-36 GEORGES DE LA TOUR, Adoration of the Shepherds, 1645-1650. Oil on canvas, 3’6” x 4’ 6”. Louvre, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide27.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide28.xml
‹#› Figure 20-24 HYACINTHE RIGAUD, Louis XIV, 1701. Oil on canvas, approx. 9’ 2” x 6’ 3”. Louvre, Paris.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide28.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide29.xml
Figure 20-26 Aerial view of palace and gardens, Versailles, France, begun 1669.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide29.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide30.xml
Figure 20-27 JULES HARDOUIN-MANSART and CHARLES LE BRUN, Galerie des Glaces (Hall of Mirrors), palace of Versailles, Versailles, France, ca. 1680.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide30.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide31.xml
‹#› Figure 20-30 JULES HARDOUIN-MANSART, Église de Dôme, Church of the Invalides, Paris, France, 1676–1706.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide31.xml.rels
ppt/slides/slide32.xml
Figure 20-38 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN, Saint Paul’s Cathedral, London, England, 1675–1710.
ppt/slides/_rels/slide32.xml.rels
ppt/presProps.xml
ppt/presentation.xml
ppt/_rels/presentation.xml.rels
_rels/.rels
ppt/media/image12.jpg
ppt/media/image3.jpg
ppt/media/image8.jpg
ppt/media/image25.jpg
ppt/media/image17.png
ppt/media/image18.png
ppt/media/image20.png
ppt/fonts/GillSans-regular.fntdata
ppt/media/image4.jpg
ppt/media/image16.jpg
ppt/media/image2.jpg
ppt/media/image29.png
ppt/media/image22.jpg
ppt/media/image21.jpg
ppt/media/image26.jpg
ppt/media/image7.jpg
ppt/media/image13.jpg
ppt/media/image23.jpg
ppt/media/image15.png
ppt/media/image27.jpg
ppt/media/image10.jpg
ppt/media/image14.jpg
ppt/media/image6.jpg
ppt/media/image24.jpg
ppt/media/image9.jpg
ppt/media/image11.jpg
ppt/fonts/GillSans-bold.fntdata
ppt/media/image1.jpg
ppt/media/image19.jpg
ppt/media/image28.jpg
ppt/media/image5.jpg
[Content_Types].xml