art history study

profileGHOST HAM
Chapter17Lecture.pptx

ppt/theme/theme1.xml

ppt/theme/theme2.xml

ppt/notesMasters/notesMaster1.xml

ppt/notesMasters/_rels/notesMaster1.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide1.xml

The High Renaissance, in the history of art, denotes the culmination of the art of the Italian Renaissance between 1480 and 1527. Because Pope Julius II patronized many artists during this time, the movement was centered in Rome. The High Renaissance is widely viewed as the greatest explosion of creative genius in history. Even relatively minor painters active during the period produced works remarkable for their perfect harmony and control of the painterly mediums. The elongated proportions and exaggerated poses in the late works of Michelangelo, Andrea del Sarto and Correggio prefigure the nascent Mannerism, as the Late Renaissance is referred to in the history of art. Raphael's death in 1520 and the sack of Rome in 1527 spelled the end of the High Renaissance. A series of foreign invasions of Italy known as the Italian Wars would continue for several decades. These began with the 1494 invasion by France that wreaked widespread devastation on Northern Italy and ended the independence of many of the city-states. Most damaging was the May 6, 1527 Sack of Rome by Spanish and German troops that all but ended the role of the Papacy as the largest patron of Renaissance art and architecture.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide1.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide2.xml

The High Renaissance starts with Leonardo (1452-1519). An extremely pivotal figure in Western art, he is a true Renaissance man: an artist, a scientist, an inventor, a true visionary of things to come. He left over 2,000 pages of notebook drawings and scribbled ideas – they have been translated and published many times over. His work emphasizes the objectiveness of human nature as he concentrated on things and forces, not people and events. I find self-portraits very interesting since the artist is studying him/herself. What is Leonardo saying about himself?

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide2.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide3.xml

This piece was part of a sculpted altar, which was commissioned by the Milanese Confraternity of the Immaculate Conception for their oratory in San Francesco in 1480. The Virgin of the Rocks does not refer to the mystery of Immaculate Conception, but depicts the type of subject that Leonardo might have painted in his native Florence where legends concerning the young Saint John the Baptist were popular. There are two versions of the painting due to the fact that Leonardo sold the first one (in the Louvre) to a private patron because of financial issues with the Confraternity. The second was painted after the Confraternity got their money issues solved and it was installed in their chapel in 1508 (now in the National Gallery in London). Leonardo uses a common compositional organization here of the pyramid to organize space. Also, notice how the hands of the figures and the glances of the eyes lead you around to all the important parts of the painting. Because Leonardo was a scientist, he tends to paint human figures and their surroundings in a clinical, observational way, not full of emotion or feeling.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide3.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide4.xml

A cartoon is a large scale preparatory drawing for painting. Leonardo was so busy and often involved with many projects, including engineering projects for the Duke of Milan, he didn’t finish everything he started, including preparatory drawings like this. This drawing is similar to the Madonna of the Rocks except instead of an angel we have Mary’s mother, St. Anne in the image with the infants John and Jesus.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide4.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide5.xml

Because Leonardo was someone who liked to experiment and invent, he decided to paint this “fresco” dry with oil and tempera paint - two paints that are not suited well for plaster. He took a long time in painting, often disappearing for weeks on end to the monks discontent. A lot of the paint started flaking off while he was painting the work, leaving the painting badly preserved and damaged when it was all said and done. Conservationists (people who are trained to preserve and restore art) went in and filled in gaps and restored the painting to how Leonard probably wanted it to look - see next slide.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide5.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide6.xml

This painting is indeed about the betrayal of Christ, but it is perfectly rendered in linear perspective with Christ’s head as the vanishing point: he is the controlling center of the work, literally and psychologically. It is life sized and was painted on the wall of the dining room (refectory) in the monastery or the Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide6.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide7.xml

The most famous work by Leonardo da Vinci, it is of the wife of a wealthy Italian merchant. You may have heard a lot of stories about it, but it really is a portrait of a real person and Leonardo didn’t give the painting to his patron, but kept it. Leonardo eventually gave the work to the King Frances I of France, Leonardo’s friend and patron, thus why it resides in the Louvre Museum today. The reason why it’s so famous is because it was stolen twice in the early 20th century. It actually had little appeal with the public before that. Now no one can really remember the first time we saw a copy of this painting somewhere.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide7.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide8.xml

This is one of the 2,000 notebook pages. It’s a little hard to see here, but Leonardo kept his notes in a mirrored script which mean he wrote backwards from right to left. Some people think he did this because he was left handed, but most agree that he did it to keep his notes from being read. There were industrial spies around at this time and a lot of his notebook pages contained notes for weaponry that he was designing of the Duke of Milan. Leonardo’s anatomical studies were mostly done between 1510-13; this is one of his most famous anatomical studies. Although the drawing is a bit faulty (the womb is not spherical in shape), it is still so expertly drawn that it is used as an example and reference in medical textbooks today.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide8.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide9.xml

Autopsies were banned by the Church, but Leonardo disregarded these rules and produced some of the most striking (albeit, not always correct) anatomical studies. From left to right: the circulatory system, the nervous system, and the endocrine system. Leonardo often looked at the human body like the machines he built.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide9.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide10.xml

What kind of modern vehicle does this remind you of? Leonardo was a man way ahead of his time. Also, here you can see the mirrored script in which he wrote a lot better.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide10.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide11.xml

Raphael is the second monumental figure in the High Renaissance who was only a painter, but what a painter! His techniques in this painting closely resemble that of Leonardo da Vinci: open landscape, pyramidal construction, attention to botanical detail. However, what separates his painting from that of Leonardo’s is the emotion (compare and contrast in the next slide). Raphael painted this theme of the Madonna and child many times and it is usually a sweet kind of scene. Here we have Saint John (the apostle) bearing a cross. Jesus grabs the cross in order to foreshadow the importance John has when he is crucified and supports Mary during his death. Raphael was an affable person who always had patrons. He was quite sociable and a ladies’ man. Unfortunately he died young, probably due to a fever from a STD he contracted.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide11.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide12.xml

Notice how these two paintings are the same subject, but very different in tone.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide12.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide13.xml

The perfect embodiment of the classical spirit of the High Renaissance. The subject is the Athenian school of thought where Plato and Aristotle are featured. It was commissioned by Pope Julius II for his library; each wall refers to the four domains of learning: theology, philosophy, law, and the arts. Influenced by the Sistine Chapel frescoes by Michelangelo (who was working on those frescoes at the same time as Raphael was working on these works), but renders it in his own style: body and spirit, action and emotion are balanced harmoniously. The architecture is essential to the picture plane as the two philosophers, Plato (left) and Aristotle (right) are in the exact center of perspective and the architecture draws our attention to the vanishing point. They are arguing for their approaches to philosophy. Plato believed in the cosmic order having an effect on human behavior and decision making (predestination) while Aristotle believed in concrete experience (free will). They are gesturing with their hands, Plato pointing toward the heavens while Aristotle’s palm is parallel to the ground. This symbolizes their philosophic approaches. Here’s a guide to who is in the painting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_School_of_Athens

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide13.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide14.xml

Photos from the Stanza in Rome

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide14.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide15.xml

Photos from the Stanza in Rome: Here you can see the gestures more closely.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide15.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide16.xml

Photos from the Stanza in Rome: That is a depiction of a brooding Michelangelo (crooked nose and infamous boots help us to identify him) on the left and the figure looking out at us on the right is Raphael. One of the most fun things to do when looking at Raphael’s work is to look for the one figure looking at us. It helps us to engage with the painting much more.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide16.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide17.xml

The sitter was an important humanist and writer during the early 16th century. He wrote a book about etiquette that he felt all ladies and gentlemen of a certain class should follow (it basically describes male and female roles along the gender lines of its time). The painting is beautifully rendered and serves as a document of the tastes and clothing of a gentleman from a certain class; it was important for Castiglione to exemplify that what he wrote in his books. This painting was later copied by the 17th century Flemish artist, Peter Paul Rubens.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide17.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide18.xml

Raphael’s patron became Pope Leo X, who was the son of Lorenzo de’ Medici – he was someone who spent huge sums of money on the arts. Raphael was someone who was known and to know him was an honor. Galatea is fleeing the giant Cyclops Polyphemus who tries to serenade her; her head is at the exact center of the composition and she and the other figures are in dynamic motion, again, much like Hellenistic (late Greek) sculpture. Many scholars say that Michelangelo’s muscular figures in the Sistine Chapel had an enduring effect on Raphael’s painting after 1512 when the ceiling was finished. You can see how much more the bodies are muscular in this work.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide18.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide19.xml

The third pivotal figure of the High Renaissance, Michelangelo embodies the effects of subjectivity and individualism on creativity and the social role of the artist. Nicknamed “il Divino” - the divine one - Michelangelo ushered in the concept that artists could approach divine creativity by changing the basic rules of art itself (or breaking rules); art comes from the artist’s personal uniqueness. Michelangelo was apprenticed to the painter, Ghirlandaio, as a teenager, but found that sculpting suited him better. He created this work at the age of 23. It is an enduring theme of a mother’s love and grief. The Virgin Mary holds the dead body of her son who suffered on the cross. It was commissioned by a French cardinal for St. Peter’s Church. The theme of the pietà wasn’t very popular in Italy, but it was very popular in other parts of Europe including France, Germany, and England (see next two slides for examples from these areas). The theme was introduced during the Black Death during the mid-1300s. The message is this: What is your suffering compared to that of the Virgin Mary who has lost her only son? It was a devotional theme to help people dealing with the loss of loved ones due to the bubonic plague. There is no Biblical reference for this theme, it is one solely made up by the Catholic Church. It is a Madonna and Child image but one full of sadness and sacrifice. Mary offers up Jesus to us. The message is that his death is the path to our salvation. Michelangelo sculpted her a little larger to accommodate the large grown body of Christ. She is eternally youthful, a nod to the classical past where gods/goddesses don’t age. My favorite story of this sculpture that truly reflects Michelangelo’s self-awareness is that after he finished the work and it was placed in the church, he sneaked into the building at night and chiseled his name across Mary’s sash so that everyone would know that he created the artwork. He felt bad afterwards and wrote in his diary that he needed to atone for the sin of pride.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide19.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide20.xml

A 14th century German example.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide20.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide21.xml

A 15th century French example.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide21.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide22.xml

Michelangelo focuses purely on the human figure. This represents the individual who is capable of heroic action in the present world and it is representative of the power of Florence and its leaders. David, the boy from the Bible, is preparing to defeat Goliath. After no one stepped up to challenge the threat of the Philistines, David, an Israelite boy, told King Saul that he would try. People couldn’t believe it, but Saul gave him a chance. With a slingshot and a rock, David took the mighty soldier down between the eyes, then beheaded him. Michelangelo’s sculpture is not of a young boy. Instead, he depicts David as a young, idealized man. Michelangelo was more interested in depicting and reflecting on the tradition of the Greeks who immortalized human figures in the prime of their lives, always athletic. The sculpture originally stood outside the Palazzo Vecchio, the city hall of Florence (a copy is there today). It was a reminder to outsiders (non-Florentines) to not underestimate the small republic, for they were capable of great deeds, just like David.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide22.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide23.xml

Details of Michelangelo’s David at the Galleria dell’Accademia.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide23.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide24.xml

Details of Michelangelo’s David at the Galleria dell’Accademia.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide24.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide25.xml

A comparison between Donatello’s David from the 15th century and Michelangelo’s David . What kids of things do you notice that are different between the two?

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide25.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide26.xml

A little comedy for you: David after visiting the U.S.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide26.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide27.xml

A former student visited Florence and sent me this photo. Indeed, you could find overweight David figurines in shops in Florence. To each his/her own!

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide27.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide28.xml

A work purely derived from Michelangelo’s creative mind, it embodies a sense of awesome power that goes beyond the visible and the ordinary. Moses was part of 40 sculptures that Michelangelo was commissioned to sculpt for Pope Julius’s tomb. He received this commission as a way for the Pope to get Michelangelo to paint the Sistine Ceiling, a task Michelangelo did NOT want to do. However, he couldn’t turn down the opportunity to create sculptures, so he reluctantly told Julius he would paint the ceiling so that he could sculpt. Moses is the Biblical character who frees the Jews from bondage in Egypt and then leads them through the desert for 40 years to the Promised Land. Michelangelo based his work on a fountain sculpture of Neptune (Roman god of the sea) in Rome. Like all of his figures, Moses seems to have a life of his own. He has been given the tablets with the Ten Commandments and is in the process of returning to the Israelites.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide28.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide29.xml

A curious detail of Moses’s head. He appears to have horns. It was common for sculptures of Moses to have “horns” because of a mistranslation in the Bible. When St. Jerome, who translated the Bible from Hebrew and Aramaic into Latin, translated this passage, “rays of light” (like a halo) in Hebrew ended up translated to “horns” in Latin.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide29.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide30.xml

Commissioned by Pope Julius II, Michelangelo begrudgingly painted over 5000 square feet of frescoes. Michelangelo considered himself a sculptor, though at a young age he was apprenticed to Ghirlandaio’s shop; however, the Pope dangled a lucrative prize to get Michelangelo to paint the ceiling, an unprecedented 40 marble figures for the Pope’s tomb after the painting was done. It took four years, primarily due to damp weather and to the fact that painting in true fresco is difficult and this was a learning process for the artist who had never painted in fresco before! Michelangelo painted the ceiling himself, his assistants only mixed plaster and paint. Please visit the Vatican website for a 360 degree look at the Sistine Chapel - you will love it: http://www.vatican.va/various/cappelle/sistina_vr/index.html

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide30.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide31.xml

When the Pope approached Michelangelo to paint the ceiling, Michelangelo refused. After several conversations (more like arguments, both the Pope and the artist were very hot-headed), Michelangelo agreed to paint the ceiling. Delighted, Julius told him what he wanted. The ceiling originally was painted blue with gold stars to resemble the heavens, but due to the fact that the foundation of the chapel (built in 1473) was settling into the marshy ground of Rome, many cracks had appeared and the ceiling needed to be repainted. Julius had come up with a decorative tile-like scheme for the ceiling. Michelangelo was outraged. Not only was he not a painter, he most certainly was not a decorative painter. After more arguing, Julius gave up and told Michelangelo more or less to “paint what you want!” This is unprecedented. Very few artists get to paint “what they want” during this time. Usually the patron tells the artist what they want. With this freedom, Michelangelo painted the stories of the first book of the Bible, Genesis. The story begins with God separating night from day (at the bottom of this image) and it concludes with the drunkenness of Noah. The other figures in the painting are prophets and sybils (female prophets) from the Old Testament. A reminder, go here and take a look around! http://www.vatican.va/various/cappelle/sistina_vr/index.html

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide31.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide32.xml

The most famous image from the Sistine Ceiling, God floats in accompanied by angels and Eve, giving Adam the spark of life. Even Michelangelo’s painted figures have a sculptural quality to them.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide32.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide33.xml

If you couldn’t tell, I like parodies! Here’s the Flying Spaghetti Monster giving Adam life. For more fun, check this link out: http://www.venganza.org/ - remember, it’s all in good fun, not to really offend.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide33.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide34.xml

Read the article about the controversy surrounding the cleaning of the ceiling: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/14/arts/review-art-after-a-much-debated-cleaning-a-richly-hued-sistine-emerges.html?pagewanted=all

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide34.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide35.xml

No one argued that the ceiling wasn’t dirty, but the way in which it was cleaned was debated by many Michelangelo experts. This slide gives you an idea of just how dirty the chapel had become.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide35.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide36.xml

Michelangelo painted this wall of the chapel 22 years after the ceiling, commissioned by a later Pope. Please watch the SmartHistory video: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/renaissance-reformation/high-ren-florence-rome/michelangelo/v/michelangelo-last-judgment-sistine-chapel-ceiling-1628-1629 Council of Trent: led by the efforts of Pope Paul III in response to the Lutheran Reformation, the Council met from 1545 through 1563; it was composed of cardinals, archbishops, bishops, abbots, and theologians and they dealt with issues of Church doctrine, including many the Protestants contested (including the importance of imagery to construct and reinforce ideological claims). We will be discussing the Reformation more in Chapter 18.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide36.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide37.xml

Pope Julius II wanted to replace the old St. Peter’s Church with a newer, more extravagant structure. To be fair, the original church dated back to the 4th century and was becoming dilapidated. Julius commissioned Bramante, a well-known architect in Rome, to create plans for the new design. Bramante designed a central-plan structure that was balanced and orderly. Unfortunately, Julius died in 1513 and Bramante died in 1514, and the plans didn’t come to fruition. It would be several more decades until a new St. Peter’s Church would be realized, but by Michelangelo and under a different Pope.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide37.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide38.xml

Michelangelo transformed the complexity of Bramante’s plan into a more simplified and uniform one. His plan adds a porch and columns in the front.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide38.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide39.xml

In order to see Michelangelo’s design for St. Peter’s we need to look at it from the back. Later Popes had different ideas of what the church should look like, so if we were to look at the church from the front, we’d only see the expansive facade and very little of Michelangelo’s design. Michelangelo was indeed influenced and inspired by Alberti. The flat pilasters in the colossal order and use of classical architecture are very similar to figure 16-45. Michelangelo designed the dome, but it was completed by a later architect as Michelangelo died in 1564 at the age of 88. Architecture was Michelangelo’s last act as a talented artist.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide39.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide40.xml

This image is for SmartHistory HW #4.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide40.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide41.xml

The subject matter of this painting is one that is still being debated as Giorgione did not have a particular subject matter in mind. The most widely accepted interpretation is that the woman is a guilt ridden Eve and her child, Cane, and that the lightning bolt symbolizes God’s fury. It is accepted that Giorgione was more interested in the landscape and describing the calm before the storm than he was in the figures presented – they seem to be an afterthought. Recent x-rays indicate that the low-ranking Italian guard used to be a nude female.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide41.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide42.xml

Traditionally attributed to Giorgione, Pastoral Symphony is now considered a work from Titian's youth. This mysterious painting is meant to be an allegory of Poetry, whose symbols - the flute and the pouring water - are shared between two nude women of ideal beauty. These unreal figures exist only in the imaginations of the two men they inspire, according to a taste widespread in Venice for simultaneous depictions of the visible and invisible.  The conception and execution of this painting illustrates the youthful style of Titian. However, the work was for many years attributed to Giorgione. Around 1509 the two artists began to work in close collaboration, making it difficult to distinguish their respective styles. When Giorgione died from plague in 1510, Titian seemed his only possible successor in Venice. Taking over the commissions from his master's private clientele, the young painter became his designated heir. The correct attribution of this work has been discussed at different periods. In the collections of Louis XIV, it was considered a Giorgione; thereafter the authorship fell to Bellini, then to Palma Vecchio or Sebastiano del Piombo; then it was deemed a Giorgione-Titian collaboration until finally, despite some controversy, the work was assigned to Titian. The history of the painting prior to its entry into French collections is unknown. The theme of music in a serene landscape might evoke an allegory of Poetry - a poem or a legend. Titian gives great weight to the landscape; it is not used as simple décor, but as a reflection of a certain state of mind. The search for balance is shown through the integration of these figures in a setting where man and nature must coexist in perfect harmony. This thought evokes the myth of Arcadia recounted in Virgil's Bucolics and reinterpreted by the Neapolitan poet Jacopo Sannazzaro. The myth tells of the happy life of the shepherds of Arcadia, whose existence is centered around music and song.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide42.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide43.xml

Titian was neither such a universal scholar as Leonardo, nor such an outstanding personality as Michelangelo, nor such a versatile and attractive man as Raphael. He was principally a painter, but a painter whose handling of paint equaled Michelangelo's mastery of draughtsmanship. This supreme skill enabled him to disregard all the time-honored rules of composition, and to rely on color to restore the unity which he apparently broke up. It was almost unheard of to move the Holy Virgin out of the center of the picture, and to place the two administering saints - St Francis, who is recognizable by the Stigmata (the wounds of the Cross), and St Peter, who has deposited the key (emblem of his dignity) on the steps of the Virgin's throne - not symmetrically on each side, but as active participants of a scene. In this altar-painting, Titian had to revive the tradition of donors' portraits, but did it in an entirely novel way. The picture was intended as a token of thanksgiving for a victory over the Turks by the Venetian nobleman Jacopo Pesaro, and Titian portrayed him kneeling before the Virgin while an armored standard-bearer drags a Turkish prisoner behind him. St Peter and the Virgin look down on him benignly while St Francis, on the other side, draws the attention of the Christ Child to the other members of the Pesaro family, who are kneeling in the corner of the picture. The whole scene seems to take place in an open courtyard, with two giant columns which rise into the clouds where two little angels are playfully engaged in raising the Cross. Titian's contemporaries may well have been amazed at the audacity with which he had dared to upset the old-established rules of composition. They must have expected, at first, to find such a picture lopsided and unbalanced. Actually it is the opposite. The unexpected composition only serves to make it gay and lively without upsetting the harmony of it all. The main reason is the way in which Titian contrived to let light, air and colors unify the scene. The idea of making a mere flag counterbalance the figure of the Holy Virgin would probably have shocked an earlier generation, but this flag, in its rich, warm color, is such a stupendous piece of painting that the venture was a complete success." The painting is very animated as every figure in the painting is doing something. It is also realistically rendered; the sunlight actually bounces off of St. Peter’s head and the Christ child is grabbing the Virgin Mary’s shawl on her head.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide43.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide44.xml

Nude portraits such as this were popular in courtly circles. This kind of nudity was acceptable because of its ties to mythology. Venus is set in contemporary time, with maids in the background getting her clothing together. According to the Uffizi Gallery in Florence: “This work, completed in 1538 for the Duke of Urbino Guidobaldo II Della Rovere, is very interesting for its many hidden meanings. It was a gift from the Duke to his young wife. The painting represents the allegory of marriage and was a “teaching” model to Giulia Varano, the young wife of eroticism, fidelity and motherhood. “The evident eroticism of the painting, in fact, reminded the woman of the marital obligations she would have to fulfill to her husband. The erotic allegory is evident in the representation of Venus, the goddess of love, as a sensual and delectable woman staring at the viewer who could not ignore her beauty. The light and warm color of her body is in contrast to the dark background, bringing out her eroticism. “The dog at the feet of the woman is the symbol of marital fidelity while, in the background, the house maid looking down at the young girl as she rummages in a chest symbolizes motherhood. The strong sensuality of this painting was therefore consistent with its private, domestic purpose, as a gift from husband to wife. The pose of the nude is certainly a tribute to his friend-master Giorgione, who in 1510 had painted a very similar subject, the Sleeping Venus. Thanks to the wise use of color and its contrasts, as well as the subtle meanings and allusions, Titian achieves the goal of representing the perfect Renaissance woman who, just like Venus, becomes the symbol of love, beauty and fertility.”

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide44.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide45.xml

Marquesa of Mantua, ruler, art collector and patron, she was actively involved in political intrigues among the interlocked nobles of Europe. She was a successful collector of antiquities and also supported convents and monasteries, including founding a girls' school in Mantua. She fulfilled a role as patron of Renaissance learning, arts and literature. Isabella d'Este's life is known in some detail because of voluminous correspondence by her and others in her circle. The correspondence provides insight not only into the art world of the Renaissance, but into the unique role this woman played. More than two thousand of her letters survive. Isabella d'Este was described as a beauty, with dark eyes and golden hair. She was famous for her fashion sense -- her style was copied by noble women throughout Europe. Her portrait was painted twice by Titian -- when she was 60 he risked his reputation by painting from an image of her when she was 25 -- and also by Leonardo da Vinci, Mantegna, Rubens and others. Isabella, and less actively her husband, supported many of the Renaissance's painters, writers, poets, and musicians. Artists with whom Isabella d'Este is associated include Perugino, Battista Spagnoli, Raphael, Andrea Mantegna, Castiglione and Bandello. Also part of the court circle were writers including Ariosto and Baldassare Castiglione, architect Giulio Romano, and musicians Bartolomeo Tromboncino and Marchetto Cara. She collected many art works and antiquities over her lifetime, some for an art-filled private studio, essentially creating an art museum. She specified the content of some of these, in commissioning works. In 1509, Isabella's husband, Francesco, was captured by the forces of King Charles VIII of France, and held in Venice as a prisoner. In his absence, Isabella served as regent, defending the city as commander of the city's forces. She negotiated a peace treaty that provided for her husband's safe return in 1512. Truly a great woman of the Renaissance!

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide45.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide46.xml

Palladio was the chief architect for the Venetian Republic. He started as a stonemason and decorative sculptor, but became a specialist in ancient styles of architecture and wrote his own treatise called The Four Books of Architecture. Villas were popular places to get away from the congestion of urban living in Venice that became aristocratic farms (much like later American plantations where Palladio’s design became realized in homes like Jefferson’s Monticello). This particular villa was not used for farming but for a monsignor who wanted a villa for social events. Palladio designed it to sit on top of a hill to enjoy four different views. Each façade is the same; it has the same formal completeness of earlier Renaissance structures and each façade resembles a Roman temple (the dome suggests the Pantheon).

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide46.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide47.xml

Central plan structure – no wings that you might see on other structures.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide47.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide48.xml

Late Renaissance or Mannerism lasted from 1525-1600: it is a period of time where artists really experimented with many different styles. The artist creates his self-portrait with the use of a convex mirror, however, while other artists would paint their self-portraits using this device, they would paint out the distortions, but not Parmigianino: he is perhaps commenting that distortion is as natural as the normal appearances of things.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide48.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide49.xml

Perhaps his most famous work, the scale is distorted completely from the proportions of the figures themselves to the space they occupy; perhaps it is a vision of unearthly perfection. The painting depicts the Virgin Mary seated on a high pedestal in luxurious robes, holding a rather large baby Jesus on her lap. Six angels crowded together on the Madonna's right, adore the Christ-child. In the lower right-hand corner of the painting is an enigmatic scene, with a row of marble columns and the emaciated figure of St. Jerome. A depiction of St. Jerome was required by the commissioner because of the saint's connection with the adoration of the Virgin Mary. Parmigianino has distorted nature for his own artistic purposes, creating a typical Mannerist serpentine figure. Jesus is also extremely large for a baby and he lies precariously on Mary's lap as if about to fall at any moment. The Madonna herself is of hardly human proportions—she is almost twice the size of the angels to her right. Her right foot rests on cushions that appear to be only a few inches away from the picture plane, but the foot itself seems to project beyond it, and is thus on "our" side of the canvas, breaking the conventions of a framed picture. Her slender hands and long fingers have also led the Italian medical scientist Vito Franco of the University of Palermo to diagnose that Parmigianino's model had the genetic disorder Marfan syndrome affecting her connective tissue.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide49.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide50.xml

Mannerist artists enjoyed allegorical subject like this one, which is depicting an Allegory of Lust. Cupid is fondling his mother, Venus, while Folly prepares to shower them with rose petals. Father Time, who appears in the upper right hand corner, pulls back the curtain to show the incest that is taking place. The other figures represent Envy and Inconstancy. The discarded masks symbolize deceit. The painting seems to illustrate the idea that love, which comes with envy and is overpowered by inconstancy, is foolish and that lovers will discover its complicated madness over time. The picture is likely to be that mentioned in Vasari's 'Life of Bronzino' of 1568: He made a picture of singular beauty, which was sent to King Francis in France; in which was a nude Venus with Cupid kissing her, and on one side Pleasure and Play with other Loves; and on the other, Fraud, Jealousy, and other passions of love. Venus and Cupid are identifiable by their attributes, as is the old man with wings and an hourglass who must be Time (not mentioned by Vasari). The identity of the other figures, and the meaning of the picture remain uncertain. The howling figure on the left has been variously interpreted as Jealousy, Despair and the effects of syphilis; the boy scattering roses and stepping on a thorn as Jest, Folly and Pleasure; the hybrid creature with the face of a girl, as Pleasure and Fraud; and the figure in the top left corner as Fraud and Oblivion. The erotic yet erudite subject matter of the painting was well suited to the tastes of King Francis I of France. It was probably sent to him as a gift from Cosimo I de' Medici, ruler of Florence, by whom Bronzino was employed as court painter. Bronzino was also an accomplished poet. The picture reflects his interest in conventional Petrarchan love lyrics as well as more bawdy poetic genres. For more information on this perplexing image, watch this: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/renaissance-reformation/mannerism1/v/bronzino-an-allegory-with-venus-and-cupid

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide50.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide51.xml

Yes, there were women artists back in the Renaissance and before! Women began to emerge as distinct artistic personalities about 1550 since before that date it was highly unlikely that women would be educated in Italy. Anguissola was from a prominent family in Cremona, she showed talent at an early age and exchanged drawings with Michelangelo who encouraged her development as an artist. She was primarily a portraitist and while a young woman, she was called to Madrid where she spent twenty years as a court painter until marriage brought her back to Italy. She was highly regarded during her lifetime and her success was inspiration for other women artists. Anguissola often used her family members as models as they were readily available subject matter. Women could not study from the live model like male artists could.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide51.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide52.xml

This version can be described as the fest of the poors, in which the figure of Christ mingles with the crowds of apostles. However, a supernatural scene with winged figures comes into sight by the light around his head. This endows the painting with a visional character clearly differentiating it from paintings of the same subject made by earlier painters like Leonardo. It is also a foreshadowing of the dramatic lighting we will see in the 17th century Baroque period.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide52.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide53.xml

As a religious feast scene, this painting was harshly criticized for being too secular. Veronese was commissioned to paint the Last Supper, and he included lavish accessories, banquet delicacies, magnificent buildings, highly fashionable nobles, drunkards, soldiers, musicians, horses, dogs, cats, little people, gypsies and apes. He was called before the Holy Tribunal of the Inquisition because certain details in the work were considered inappropriate for a religious theme. Veronese defended himself completely and thus changed the title of the work from The Last Supper to Christ in the House of Levi.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide53.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide54.xml

Correggio is an artist described as “proto-Baroque" for his use of dark and light as well as his subject matter being sensual and emotional. Baroque artists would consider him an equal to Michelangelo and Raphael. This is a dome fresco for the Parma Cathedral; the figures float up to the ceiling and Correggio does a wonderful job in melding architectural space with illusionistic perspective and space. We are on the ground looking up into the dome as the Virgin Mary ascends into heaven after she dies.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide54.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide55.xml

Giambologna is a French artist who moved to Italy in 1555 for further training. In this sculpture, he uses the legend of ancient Rome of the city’s founders trying to find wives among their neighbors, the Sabines to no avail. The Romans eventually invited the entire tribe of Sabines to Rome for a festival, but took them away by force and thus ensured the future of their race. The figures spiral upward and is a composition to be seen from all sides, which is another way Late Renaissance artists break from the severe classicism of the High Renaissance.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide55.xml.rels

ppt/notesSlides/notesSlide56.xml

You will recall that Giacomo della Porta worked with Michelangelo and also completed the dome on St. Peter’s basilica after Michelangelo’s death. This commission came from the Jesuits who were a monastic order founded during the Catholic Counter-Reformation, basically, an evangelical branch of the Catholic Church. This building takes into account many of the lessons learned from Early and High Renaissance design, but it also serves as a departure point from the Renaissance and a starting point for the Baroque period. It would have a tremendous impact on Baroque architecture of the 17th century.

ppt/notesSlides/_rels/notesSlide56.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout1.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout1.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout2.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout2.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout3.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout3.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout4.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout4.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout5.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout5.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout6.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout6.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout7.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout7.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout8.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout8.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout9.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout9.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout10.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout10.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout11.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout11.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout12.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout12.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout13.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout13.xml.rels

ppt/slideLayouts/slideLayout14.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideLayouts/_rels/slideLayout14.xml.rels

ppt/slideMasters/slideMaster1.xml

‹#›

ppt/slideMasters/_rels/slideMaster1.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide1.xml

Rome with Renaissance and Baroque Monuments

ppt/slides/_rels/slide1.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide2.xml

‹#› LEONARDO DA VINCI, Self-Portrait, 1512-15

ppt/slides/_rels/slide2.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide3.xml

Figure 17-2 LEONARDO DA VINCI, Madonna of the Rocks, ca. 1485. Oil on wood (transferred to canvas), approx. 6’ 3” x 3’ 7”. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide3.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide4.xml

‹#› Figure 17-3 LEONARDO DA VINCI, cartoon for Virgin and Child with Saint Anne and the Infant Saint John, ca. 1505–1507. Charcoal heightened with white on brown paper, approx. 4’ 6” x 3’ 3”. National Gallery, London.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide4.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide5.xml

LEONARDO DA VINCI, Last Supper (uncleaned), ca. 1495–1498. Fresco (oil and tempera on plaster), 29’ 10” x 13’ 9”. Refectory, Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide5.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide6.xml

Figure 17-4 LEONARDO DA VINCI, Last Supper (cleaned), ca. 1495–1498. Fresco (oil and tempera on plaster), 29’ 10” x 13’ 9”. Refectory, Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide6.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide7.xml

Figure 17-5 LEONARDO DA VINCI, Mona Lisa, ca. 1503-1505. Oil on wood, 2 61/4” x 1’ 9”. Musée du Louvre.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide7.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide8.xml

‹#› Figure 17-6 LEONARDO DA VINCI, Embryo in the Womb, ca. 1510. Pen and ink on paper. Royal Library, Windsor Castle.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide8.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide9.xml

LEONARDO DA VINCI, Anatomical studies, 15th century

ppt/slides/_rels/slide9.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide10.xml

LEONARDO DA VINCI, Study for flying devices, 15th century

ppt/slides/_rels/slide10.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide11.xml

‹#› Figure 17-8 RAPHAEL, Madonna in the Meadow, 1505. Oil on panel, 3’ 8 1/2” x 2’ 10 1/4”. Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide11.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide12.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide12.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide13.xml

Figure 17-9 RAPHAEL, Philosophy (School of Athens), Stanza della Segnatura, Vatican Palace, Rome, Italy, 1509–1511. Fresco, approx. 19’ x 27’.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide13.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide14.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide14.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide15.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide15.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide16.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide16.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide17.xml

‹#› Figure 17-10A RAPHAEL, Baldassare Castiglione, ca. 1514. Oil on wood transferred to canvas, approx. 2’ 6 1/4” x 2’ 2 1/2”. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide17.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide18.xml

‹#› Figure 17-11 RAPHAEL, Galatea, Sala di Galatea, Villa Farnesina, Rome, Italy, 1513. Fresco, 9’ 8” x 7’ 5”.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide18.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide19.xml

Figure 17-12 MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI, Pietà, ca. 1498-1500. Marble, 5’ 8 1/2” high. Saint Peter’s, Vatican City, Rome.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide19.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide20.xml

‹#› Virgin with the Dead Christ (Röttgen Pietà), from the Rhineland, Germany, ca. 1300–1325. Painted wood, 2’ 10 1/2” high. Rheinisches Landemuseum, Bonn.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide20.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide21.xml

ENGUERRAND QUARTON, Avignon Pietà, c. 1470

ppt/slides/_rels/slide21.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide22.xml

Figure 17-13 MICHELANGELO, David, 1501–1504. Marble, 13’ 5” high. Galleria dell’Accademia, Florence.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide22.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide23.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide23.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide24.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide24.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide25.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide25.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide26.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide26.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide27.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide27.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide28.xml

‹#› Figure 17-14 MICHELANGELO, Moses, San Pietro in Vincoli, Rome, Italy, ca. 1513–1515. Marble, approx. 8’ 4” high.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide28.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide29.xml

‹#› MICHELANGELO, Moses, detail

ppt/slides/_rels/slide29.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide30.xml

‹#› Figure 17-1 Interior of the Sistine Chapel (view facing east), Vatican City, Rome, Italy, built 1473.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide30.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide31.xml

‹#› Figure 17-17 MICHELANGELO, ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, Vatican City, Rome, Italy, 1508–1512. Fresco, approx. 128’ x 45’.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide31.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide32.xml

Figure 17-18 MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI, Creation of Adam (detail), ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, Vatican City, Rome, Italy, 1511–1512. Fresco, approx. 9’ 2” x 18’ 8”.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide32.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide33.xml

ppt/slides/_rels/slide33.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide34.xml

‹#› Cleaning of ceiling of Sistine Chapel, Vatican City, Rome, Italy, 1977–1989.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide34.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide35.xml

‹#› Detail of the Azor-Sadoch lunette’s left side over one of the Sistine Chapel windows at various stages of the restoration process, Vatican City, Rome, Italy, 1977–1989.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide35.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide36.xml

‹#› Figure 17-19 MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI, Last Judgment, fresco on the altar wall of the Sistine Chapel, Vatican City, Rome, Italy, 1534–1541.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide36.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide37.xml

Figure 17-22 DONATO D’ANGELO BRAMANTE, plan for the new Saint Peter’s, the Vatican, Rome, Italy, 1505.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide37.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide38.xml

‹#› Figure 17-24 MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI, plan for Saint Peter’s, Vatican City, Rome, Italy, 1546.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide38.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide39.xml

‹#› Figure 17-25 MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI, Saint Peter’s (view from the northwest), Vatican City, Rome, Italy, 1546–1564. Dome completed by GIACOMO DELLA PORTA, 1590.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide39.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide40.xml

Figure 17-33 GIOVANNI BELLINI and TITIAN, The Feast of the Gods, 1529. Oil on canvas, approx. 5’ 7” x 6’ 2”. National Gallery of Art, Washington (Widener Collection).

ppt/slides/_rels/slide40.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide41.xml

‹#› Figure 17-34 GIORGIONE DA CASTELFRANCO, The Tempest, ca. 1510. Oil on canvas, 2’ 7” x 2’ 4 3/4”. Galleria dell’Accademia, Venice.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide41.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide42.xml

Figure 17-35 TITIAN. Pastoral Symphony, ca. 1508. Oil on canvas, approx. 3’ 7” x 4’ 6”. Louvre, Paris.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide42.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide43.xml

‹#› Figure 17-37 TITIAN, Madonna of the Pesaro Family, Santa Maria dei Frari, Venice, Italy, 1519–1526. Oil on canvas, approx. 16’ x 9’.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide43.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide44.xml

Figure 17-39 TITIAN, Venus of Urbino, 1538. Oil on canvas, approx. 4’ x 5’ 6”. Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide44.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide45.xml

Figure 17-40 TITIAN, Isabella d’Este, 1534–1536. Oil on canvas, 3’ 4 1/8” x 2’ 1 3/16”. Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide45.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide46.xml

Figure 17-28 ANDREA PALLADIO, Villa Rotonda (formerly Villa Capra), near Vicenza, Italy, ca. 1566–1570.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide46.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide47.xml

‹#› Figure 17-29 ANDREA PALLADIO, plan of the Villa Rotonda (formerly Villa Capra), near Vicenza, Italy, ca. 1566–1570.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide47.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide48.xml

Figure 17-43 PARMIGIANINO . Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror, 1524. Oil on wood, 9 5/8” diameter. Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide48.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide49.xml

Figure 17-44 PARMIGIANINO, Madonna with the Long Neck, ca. 1535. Oil on wood, approx. 7’ 1” x 4’ 4”. Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide49.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide50.xml

‹#› Figure 17-45 BRONZINO, Venus, Cupid, Folly, and Time (The Exposure of Luxury), ca. 1546. Oil on wood, approx. 5’ 1” x 4’ 8 3/4”. National Gallery, London.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide50.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide51.xml

Figure 17-47 SOFONISBA ANGUISSOLA, Portrait of the Artist’s Sisters and Brother, ca. 1555. Methuen Collection, Corsham Court, Wiltshire.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide51.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide52.xml

Figure 17-48 TINTORETTO, Last Supper, Chancel, San Giorgio Maggiore, Venice, Italy, 1594. Oil on canvas, 12’ x 18’ 8”.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide52.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide53.xml

Figure 17-49 PAOLO VERONESE, Christ in the House of Levi, 1573. Oil on canvas, approx. 18’ 6” x 42’ 6”. Galleria dell’Accademia, Venice.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide53.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide54.xml

‹#› Figure 17-51 ANTONIO ALLEGRI DA CORREGGIO, Assumption of the Virgin, dome fresco of Parma Cathedral, Parma, Italy, 1526–1530.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide54.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide55.xml

Figure 17-53 GIAMBOLOGNA, Abduction of the Sabine Women, Loggia dei Lanzi, Piazza della Signoria, Florence, Italy, completed 1583. Marble, approx. 13’ 6” high.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide55.xml.rels

ppt/slides/slide56.xml

‹#› Figure 17-57 GIACOMO DELLA PORTA, west façade of Il Gesù, Rome, Italy, begun 1568.

ppt/slides/_rels/slide56.xml.rels

ppt/presProps.xml

ppt/presentation.xml

ppt/_rels/presentation.xml.rels

_rels/.rels

ppt/media/image3.jpg

ppt/media/image50.jpg

ppt/media/image13.png

ppt/media/image34.jpg

ppt/media/image8.png

ppt/media/image33.jpg

ppt/media/image51.jpg

ppt/fonts/GillSans-regular.fntdata

ppt/media/image4.jpg

ppt/media/image42.jpg

ppt/media/image16.jpg

ppt/media/image18.jpg

ppt/media/image43.jpg

ppt/media/image38.png

ppt/media/image2.jpg

ppt/media/image7.png

ppt/media/image35.jpg

ppt/media/image52.jpg

ppt/media/image26.jpg

ppt/media/image17.jpg

ppt/media/image61.jpg

ppt/media/image10.png

ppt/media/image24.png

ppt/media/image27.jpg

ppt/media/image57.jpg

ppt/media/image44.jpg

ppt/media/image14.jpg

ppt/media/image9.jpg

ppt/media/image59.jpg

ppt/media/image19.png

ppt/media/image32.jpg

ppt/media/image62.jpg

ppt/fonts/GillSans-bold.fntdata

ppt/media/image1.jpg

ppt/media/image58.jpg

ppt/media/image45.jpg

ppt/media/image28.jpg

ppt/media/image23.png

ppt/media/image15.jpg

ppt/media/image12.jpg

ppt/media/image20.jpg

ppt/media/image47.jpg

ppt/media/image46.jpg

ppt/media/image29.jpg

ppt/media/image55.jpg

ppt/media/image48.jpg

ppt/media/image30.jpg

ppt/media/image22.jpg

ppt/media/image21.jpg

ppt/media/image25.png

ppt/media/image39.jpg

ppt/media/image56.jpg

ppt/media/image60.png

ppt/media/image36.jpg

ppt/media/image49.jpg

ppt/media/image31.png

ppt/media/image53.jpg

ppt/media/image6.jpg

ppt/media/image40.jpg

ppt/media/image11.jpg

ppt/media/image37.jpg

ppt/media/image5.jpg

ppt/media/image54.jpg

ppt/media/image41.jpg

[Content_Types].xml