Live Task

profilemahesh91
Chapter17_9thEd2.pptx

Chapter 17

Skills for Optimizing Leadership as Situations Change

© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom. No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter Outline

Creating a compelling vision

Managing conflict

Negotiation

Diagnosing performance problems in individuals, groups, and organizations

Team building at the top

Punishment

© McGraw-Hill Education

Creating a Compelling Vision

Leaders often struggle to give a compelling description of how they add value and to get anyone excited to become part of their team

A leader’s vision can have a pervasive effect on followers and teams

Should be a personal statement that answers the following questions:

Where is the team going, and how will it get there?

How does the team win, and how does it contribute to the broader organization’s success?

How does the speaker define leadership?

What gets the speaker excited about being a leader?

What are the speaker’s key values?

© McGraw-Hill Education

Figure. 17.1: The Four Components of Leadership Vision

© McGraw-Hill Education

Conflict

Occurs when:

Opposing parties have seemingly incompatible interests or goals, such as when team members:

Have strong differences in values, beliefs, or goals

Have high levels of task or lateral interdependence

Are competing for scarce resources or rewards

Are under high levels of stress

Face uncertain or incompatible demands

Leaders’ actions are inconsistent with their stated goals and vision

There is lack of communication

© McGraw-Hill Education

Managing Conflict

Conflict resolution process is affected by several factors

Size of an issue, extent to which the problem is defined egocentrically, and the existence of hidden agendas

Seeing a conflict situation in win-lose, either-or, or zero-sum terms

Perceiving the conflict as unresolvable

Some level of conflict may help boost innovation and performance

Conflict is viewed as useful when it enhances group productivity and as counterproductive when it hinders group performance

© McGraw-Hill Education

Conflict Resolution Strategies, 1

Conflict resolution can be thought of in terms of the following independent dimensions:

Cooperativeness versus uncooperativeness

Assertiveness versus unassertiveness

Approaches to managing conflict using the two-dimension scheme

Competition: Desire to achieve one’s own ends at the expense of someone else

Accommodation: Entirely giving in to someone else’s concerns without making any effort to achieve one’s own ends

© McGraw-Hill Education

Conflict Resolution Strategies, 2

Sharing: Both parties give up something, yet gain something

Collaboration: Effort to fully satisfy both parties

Avoidance: Indifference to the concerns of both parties

Leaders should attempt to work out a resolution by looking at long-term rather than short-term goals

Should seek win-win outcomes that try to satisfy both sides’ needs and continuing interests

© McGraw-Hill Education

Figure 17.2: Conflict-Handling Orientations

Source: Adapted from Kenneth W. Thomas and Ralph H. Kilmann, The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. (Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc., 1974, 2002.)

Jump to Figure 17.2: Conflict-Handling Orientations, Appendix

© McGraw-Hill Education

Fisher and Ury’s Tips for Negotiating

Prepare for the negotiation

Anticipate each side’s key concerns, issues, attitudes, negotiating strategies, and goals

Separate the people from the problem

Do not place blame

Communicate clearly

Focus on interests, not positions

One should focus on one’s own interests and one’s counterpart’s interests

© McGraw-Hill Education

Diagnosing Performance Problems

Model of Performance

Performance is a function of the product of expectations, capabilities, opportunities, and motivation

Framework for understanding why a follower or team may not be performing up to expectations and what the leader can do to improve the situation

Multiplicative rather than a compensatory model

Deficit in any component results in a substantial decrement in performance that cannot be easily made up by increasing the other components

© McGraw-Hill Education

Components of the Model of Performance, 1

Expectations

Leaders should ensure that followers understand their roles, goals, performance standards, and the key metrics for determining success

Capabilities

Abilities and skills are the components that make up capabilities

Opportunities

Leaders should ensure that followers and teams have the needed equipment, financial resources, and opportunities to exhibit their skills

© McGraw-Hill Education

Components of the Model of Performance, 2

Motivation

Leaders can resolve motivation problems in followers and teams in the following manner:

Select followers who have higher levels of achievement or intrinsic motivation for the task

Set clear goals or do a better job of providing performance feedback

Reallocate work across the team or redesign the tasks to improve skill variety, task significance, and task identity

Restructure rewards and punishments to closely link them to performance levels

© McGraw-Hill Education

Team Building at the Top

Executive teams are similar to other types of teams but different in the following ways:

Most top teams never function as a whole

When a team-related situation arises, team members must use their technical individual skills and the skills required for high-performance teamwork

Executive teams can enhance teamwork throughout the organization and can change organizational systems

© McGraw-Hill Education

Trip Wire Lessons

Trip Wire 1: Call the performing unit a team but manage members as individuals

Trip Wire 2: Create an inappropriate authority balance

Trip Wire 3: Tell a large group of people in general terms what needs to be accomplished, and let them work out the details

Trip Wire 4: Specify challenging team objectives, but skimp on organizational supports

Trip Wire 5: Assume that members already have all the competence they need to work well as a team

© McGraw-Hill Education

Punishment

Administration of an aversive event or the withdrawal of a desirable event or stimulus, which decreases the likelihood that a particular behavior will be repeated

Myths about punishment

Punishment results in undesirable emotional side effects in the recipient

Punishment is unethical and inhumane

Punishment rarely eliminates the undesirable behavior

© McGraw-Hill Education

Effects of Punishment on Satisfaction and Performance

If administered properly, punishment can lead to positive organizational outcomes

May help increase job satisfaction, may decrease role ambiguity and absenteeism, and may improve performance

Intense levels of punishment in a noncontingent manner can have a devastating effect on the work unit

© McGraw-Hill Education

Administering Punishment

To make punishment effective, leaders should:

Recognize their bias toward internal attributions

Gather as many facts as possible before deciding whether to administer punishment

Focus on the act, not the person

Be consistent across both behaviors and leaders

Clarify the rationale and identify the future consequences of misbehavior

Provide guidance about how to improve

© McGraw-Hill Education

Summary

A leader’s vision can have a pervasive effect on followers and teams

Conflict may help bolster innovation and performance

Leaders should take the time to prepare for a negotiating session, separate people from the problems, and focus on interests rather than on positions

The performance model shows that performance is a function of expectations, capabilities, opportunities, and motivation

Executives do not always need to perform as a team to be effective

Properly administered punishment does not cause undesirable emotional side effects, is not unethical, and may effectively suppress undesirable behavior

© McGraw-Hill Education

appendices

Figure. 17.1: The Four Components of Leadership Vision, Appendix

The term ideas is presented on the top-left portion of the figure. The following questions are listed below ideas: what is the team’s current situation?, where is the team going?, and how will the team get there? The term expectations is presented on the top-right portion of the figure. The following points are listed under the term expectations: operating principles and performance standards. Ideas and expectations are linked by a horizontal double-headed arrow. The term emotional energy is presented at the center of the figure, and the point under the term reads passion about the team. Emotional energy is linked to ideas and expectations using double-headed arrows. The term edge is presented below emotional energy. Both the components are connected by double-headed arrows. The points below the term edge read tough calls and stories, analogies, and metaphors.

Jump Back to Figure. 17.1: The Four Components of Leadership Vision

© McGraw-Hill Education

Multimedia Lecture Support Package to Accompany Basic Marketing

Lecture Script 6-21

Figure 17.2: Conflict-Handling Orientations, Appendix

The x-axis of the graph is labeled party’s desire to satisfy others’ concern, and a horizontal double-headed arrow is presented along the axis to indicate a continuum. The end of the axis near the origin is labeled uncooperative, and the opposite end is labeled cooperative.

The y-axis of the graph is labeled party’s desire to satisfy own concern, and a vertical double-headed arrow is presented along the y-axis to indicate a continuum. The end of the axis near the origin is labeled unassertive, and the opposite end is labeled assertive.

Five dots are plotted in the plot area. The first dot is labeled avoidant, or neglect, and is plotted close to unassertive on the y-axis and uncooperative on the x-axis. The second dot is labeled accommodative, or appeasement. This dot is plotted on the end labeled cooperative on the x-axis and unassertive on the y-axis. The third dot is labeled sharing, or compromise, and it is plotted roughly below the center of the plot area. The fourth dot is labeled competitive, or domination. This dot is plotted on the end of the y-axis labeled assertive. The fifth dot is labeled collaborative, or integration. This dot is aligned close to the point labeled assertive on the y-axis and cooperative on the x-axis.

Jump Back to Figure 17.2: Conflict-Handling Orientations

© McGraw-Hill Education