Online quiz for 6/14/19
Project Management (Chapter 16)
Production & Operations Management INFO 335-71
Week 4
Learning Objectives
Describe project management objectives
Describe the project life cycle
Diagram networks of project activities
Estimate the completion time of a project
Compute the probability of completing a project by a specific time
Determine how to reduce the length of a project effectively
Describe the critical chain approach to project management
Project Management Applications
What is a project? • Any unique endeavor with specific objectives • With multiple activities • With defined precedent relationships • With a specific time period for completion
Examples • A major event like a wedding • Any construction project • Designing a political campaign
Project Life Cycle
Conception: identify the need
Feasibility analysis or study: costs benefits, and risks
Planning: who, how long, what to do?
Execution: doing the project
Termination: ending the project
Network Planning Techniques
Program Evaluation & Review Technique (PERT):
• Developed to manage the Polaris missile project • Used to determine a project’s planned completion
date and identify the critical path
Critical Path Method (CPM):
• Developed to coordinate maintenance projects in the chemical industry
• An algorithm for scheduling a set of project activities; identification of the critical path/s (longest)
Network Planning Techniques – Activity Time Estimates
Probabilistic
Process that uses optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic time estimates
PERT
Use when there is uncertainty about duration • Example: bad weather,
delays, unexpected labor issues
Deterministic
Assumes the activity duration is a known certainty
CPM
Use when reliable estimates can be made based on similar activities in the past
PERT and CPM Benefits
Graphically display the precedence
relationships & sequence of activities
Estimate the project’s duration
Identify critical activities that cannot be delayed
without delaying the project
Estimate the amount of slack associated with
non-critical activities
Network Diagrams
Activity-on-Node (AON): • Uses nodes to represent the activity • Uses arrows to represent precedence relationships
Project Management and Network Planning – 4 Steps
1. Describe the Project a. Objective, project end date
b. Define project activities (resource requirements such as labor, equipment, funds) and precedence relationships
2. Diagram the Network
3. Estimate Project’s Completion Time
4. Monitor Project’s Progression a. Quality, audit, measurements
Step 1-Define the Project: Cables By Us is bringing a new product on line to be manufactured in their current facility in existing space. The owners have identified 11 activities and their precedence relationships. Develop an AON for the project.
Activity Description Immediate
Predecessor Duration (weeks)
A Develop product specifications None 4 B Design manufacturing process A 6 C Source & purchase materials A 3 D Source & purchase tooling & equipment B 6 E Receive & install tooling & equipment D 14 F Receive materials C 5 G Pilot production run E & F 2 H Evaluate product design G 2 I Evaluate process performance G 3 J Write documentation report H & I 4 K Transition to manufacturing J 2
Step 2- Diagram the Network
Cable By Us
Activity Description
A Develop product specifications B Design manufacturing process C Source & purchase materials D Source & purchase tooling & equipment E Receive & install tooling & equipment F Receive materials G Pilot production run H Evaluate product design I Evaluate process performance J Write documentation report K Transition to manufacturing
Step 3 (a) - Estimate Project’s Completion Time
Add Deterministic Time Estimates and Connected Paths
Step 3 (a) - Estimate Project’s Completion Time – cont’d
The longest path (ABDEGIJK) limits the project’s duration (project cannot finish in less time than its longest path)
ABDEGIJK is the project’s critical path
Paths Path duration ABDEGHJK 40 ABDEGIJK 41 ACFGHJK 22 ACFGIJK 23
Activity
A Develop product specifications B Design manufacturing process C Source & purchase materials D Source & purchase tooling & equipment E Receive & install tooling & equipment F Receive materials G Pilot production run H Evaluate product design I Evaluate process performance J Write documentation report K Transition to manufacturing
Some Network Definitions
All activities on the critical path have zero slack Slack defines how long non-critical activities can be
delayed without delaying the project Slack = the activity’s late finish minus its early finish (or
its late start minus its early start) Earliest Start (ES) = the earliest finish of the immediately
preceding activity Earliest Finish (EF) = is the ES plus the activity time Latest Start (LS) and Latest Finish (LF) = the latest an
activity can start (LS) or finish (LF) without delaying the project completion
ES, EF Network (Deterministic)
LS, LF Network (Deterministic)
Delay H = LS – ES = 33 – 32 = 1 Week = LF
Calculating Slack
Step 3 (b) - Estimate Project’s Completion Time
Using Probabilistic Time Estimates • Beta Probability Distribution model to calculate; definite
end points; weighted average for each activity
Step 3 (b) - Estimate Project’s Completion Time – cont’d
Ac tiv ity O p tim is tic
tim e M o st lik e ly
tim e P e s s im is tic
tim e E x p e c te d
tim e A 2 4 6 4 B 3 7 1 0 6 .8 3 C 2 3 5 3 .1 7 D 4 7 9 6 .8 3 E 1 2 1 6 2 0 1 6 F 2 5 8 5 G 2 2 2 2 H 2 3 4 3 I 2 3 5 3 .1 7 J 2 4 6 4 K 2 2 2 2
6
cpessimistilikelymost 4optimistic timeExpected
Best Case Worst Case
Step 3 (b) - Estimate Project’s Completion Time – cont’d
Network Diagram with Probabilistic expected activity times
Step 3 (b) - Estimate Project’s Completion Time – cont’d
Estimated Path Durations through the Network
ABDEGIJK is the expected critical path & the project has an expected duration of 44.83 weeks
Activities on paths Expected duration ABDEGHJK 44.66 ABDEGIJK 44.83 ACFGHJK 23.17 ACFGIJK 23.34
ES, EF Network (Probabilistic)
Gantt Chart - Each Activity Finished at the ES Date
LS, LF Network (Probabilistic)
Gantt Chart - Each Activity Finished at the LS Date
Project Is to Be Completed in 44.83 Weeks
Step 4 – Monitor The Project’s Progression
Project Manager is responsible for the project’s success/failures
Quality, Audits to monitor critical path activities, delays, slack, processes
Use Measurements to help guide next steps, actions, improvements
Estimating The Probability of Completion Dates
Using probabilistic time estimates offers the advantage of predicting the probability of project completion dates
We already calculated expected time for each activity using three time estimates; Now we need to calculate the variance for each activity
The variance of the beta probability distribution is:
p=pessimistic activity time estimate
o=optimistic activity time estimate 2
2
6
op σ
Project Activity Variance
Activity Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Variance
A 2 4 6 0.44
B 3 7 10 1.36
C 2 3 5 0.25
D 4 7 9 0.69
E 12 16 20 1.78
F 2 5 8 1.00
G 2 2 2 0.00
H 2 3 4 0.11
I 2 3 5 0.25
J 2 4 6 0.44
K 2 2 2 0.00
2σ
Variances of Each Path Through The Network
Path Number
Activities on Path
Path Variance (weeks)
1 A,B,D,E,G,H,J,k 4.82
2 A,B,D,E,G,I,J,K 4.96
3 A,C,F,G,H,J,K 2.24
4 A,C,F,G,I,J,K 2.38
Calculating Probability of Completing a Project in Less Than a Specified Time
When you know: • The expected completion time • Its variance
You can calculate the probability of completing the project in “X” weeks with the following formula:
Where DT = the specified completion date EFPath = the expected completion time of the path
2 Pσ
EFD
time standard path
time expected pathtime specified z
PT
path of varianceσ 2Path
Calculating Probability of Completing a Project in Less Than a Specified Time – cont’d
Example – 48 weeks Use the z values in Appendix B to determine probabilities
e.g. probability for path 1 is
Path Number
Activities on Path
Path Variance (weeks)
z-value Probability of Completion
1 A,B,D,E,G,H,J,k 4.82 1.5216 0.9357
2 A,B,D,E,G,I,J,K 4.96 1.4215 0.9222
3 A,C,F,G,H,J,K 2.24 16.5898 1.000
4 A,C,F,G,I,J,K 2.38 15.9847 1.000
1.52 4.82
weeks 44.66weeks 48 z
Expected duration
0.00 0.0 0.5000 0.1 0.5398 0.2 0.5793 0.3 0.6179 0.4 0.6554 0.5 0.6915 0.6 0.7257 0.7 0.7580 0.8 0.7881 0.9 0.8159 1.0 0.8413 1.1 0.8643 1.2 0.8849 1.3 0.9032 1.4 0.9192 1.5 0.9332 1.6 0.9452 1.7 0.9554 1.8 0.9641 1.9 0.9713 2.0 0.9772 2.1 0.9821 2.2 0.9861 2.3 0.9893 2.4 0.9918 2.5 0.9938 2.6 0.9953 2.7 0.9965 2.8 0.9974 2.9 0.9981 3.0 0.9987
Reducing Project Completion Time
Project completion times may need to be shortened because: • Different deadlines • Penalty clauses • Need to put resources on a new project • Promised completion dates
Reduced project completion time is “crashing”
Reducing Project Completion Time – cont'd
Crashing a project needs to balance • Shorten a project duration • Cost to shorten the project duration
Crashing a project requires you to know • Normal activity time/costs • Crash time/costs of each activity • Activities on the critical path
Crash cost/duration = (crash cost-normal cost)/(normal time – crash time)
Reducing Project Completion Time With Crashing
Activity Normal Time (wk)
Normal Cost ($)
Crash Time
Crash Cost ($)
Max. weeks of reduction
Reduce cost per week
A 4 8,000 3 11,000 1 3,000
B 6 30,000 5 35,000 1 5,000
C 3 6,000 3 6,000 0 0
D 6 24,000 4 28,000 2 2,000
E 14 60,000 12 72,000 2 6,000
F 5 5,000 4 6,500 1 1500
G 2 6,000 2 6,000 0 0
H 2 4,000 2 4,000 0 0
I 3 4,000 2 5,000 1 1,000
J 4 4,000 2 6,400 2 1,200
K 2 5,000 2 5,000 0 0
Normal Time – Crash Time
(Crash Cost – Normal Cost) / (Normal Time – Crash Time)
Crashing Example: Suppose the Cables By Us project manager wants to reduce a product project from 41 to 36 weeks.
Crashing Costs are considered to be linear Look to crash activities on the critical path Crash the least expensive activities on the critical
path first (based on cost per week) • Crash activity I from 3 weeks to 2 weeks $1000 • Crash activity J from 4 weeks to 2 weeks $2400 • Crash activity D from 6 weeks to 4 weeks $4000 • Recommend Crash Cost $7400
Question: Will crashing 5 weeks return more in benefits than it costs?
Crashed Network Diagram
The Critical Chain Approach
Focuses on project due dates rather than on individual activities and the following realities: • Project time estimates are uncertain > add safety time • Multi-levels of organization may add additional time to be
“safe” • Individual activity buffers may be wasted on lower-priority
activities • Best approach > place project safety buffer at the end
Original critical path
Activity A Activity B Activity C Activity D Activity E
Critical path with project buffer
Activity A Activity B Activity C Activity D Activity E Project Buffer