Assignment !!
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning and S&OP
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer and Render
Operations Management, Eleventh Edition
Principles of Operations Management, Ninth Edition
PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
13
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline
Global Company Profile:
Frito-Lay
- The Planning Process
- Sales and Operations Planning
- The Nature of Aggregate Planning
- Aggregate Planning Strategies
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline - Continued
Methods for Aggregate Planning
Aggregate Planning in Services
Revenue Management
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you should be able to:
- Define sales and operations planning
- Define aggregate planning
- Identify optional strategies for developing an aggregate plan
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
When you complete this chapter you should be able to:
Learning Objectives
- Prepare a graphical aggregate plan
- Solve an aggregate plan via the transportation method
- Understand and solve a revenue management problem
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning at
Frito-Lay
- More than three dozen brands, 15 brands sell more than $100 million annually, 7 sell over $1 billion
- Planning processes covers 3 to 18 months
- Unique processes and specially designed equipment
- High fixed costs require high volumes and high utilization
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning at
Frito-Lay
- Demand profile based on historical sales, forecasts, innovations, promotion, local demand data
- Match total demand to capacity, expansion plans, and costs
- Quarterly aggregate plan goes to 36 plants in 17 regions
- Each plant develops 4-week plan for product lines and production runs
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Planning Process
Figure 13.1
Long-range plans (over one year)
Capacity decisions critical to long range plans
Issues:
Research and Development
New product plans
Capital investments
Facility location/expansion
Intermediate-range plans (3 to 18 months)
Issues:
Sales and operations planning
Production planning and budgeting
Setting employment, inventory,
subcontracting levels
Analyzing operating plans
Short-range plans (up to 3 months)
Scheduling techniques
Issues:
Job assignments
Ordering
Job scheduling
Dispatching
Overtime
Part-time help
Top executives
Operations managers with sales and operations planning team
Operations managers, supervisors, foremen
Responsibility
Planning tasks and time horizons
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Sales and Operations Planning
- Coordination of demand forecasts with functional areas and the supply chain
- Typically done by cross-functional teams
- Determine which plans are feasible
- Limitations must be reflected
- Provides warning when resources do not match expectations
- Output is an aggregate plan
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
S&OP
and the
Aggregate
Plan
Figure 13.2
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Sales and Operations Planning
- Decisions must be tied to strategic planning and integrated with all areas of the firm over all planning horizons
- S&OP is aimed at
The coordination and integration of the internal and external resources necessary for a successful aggregate plan
Communication of the plan to those charged with its execution
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Sales and Operations Planning
- Requires
- A logical overall unit for measuring sales and output
- A forecast of demand for an intermediate planning period in these aggregate terms
- A method for determining relevant costs
- A model that combines forecasts and costs so that scheduling decisions can be made for the planning period
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning
The objective of aggregate planning is usually to meet forecast demand while minimizing cost over the planning period
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning
| QUARTER 1 | ||
| Jan. | Feb. | March |
| 150,000 | 120,000 | 110,000 |
| QUARTER 2 | ||
| April | May | June |
| 100,000 | 130,000 | 150,000 |
| QUARTER 3 | ||
| July | Aug. | Sept. |
| 180,000 | 150,000 | 140,000 |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning
- Combines appropriate resources into general terms
- Part of a larger production planning system
- Disaggregation breaks the plan down into greater detail
- Disaggregation results in a master production schedule
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning Strategies
- Should inventories be used to absorb changes in demand?
- Should changes be accommodated by varying the size of the workforce?
- Should part-timers, overtime, or idle time be used to absorb changes?
- Should subcontractors be used and maintain a stable workforce?
- Should prices or other factors be changed to influence demand?
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Capacity Options
Changing inventory levels
- Increase inventory in low demand periods to meet high demand in the future
- Increases costs associated with storage, insurance, handling, obsolescence, and capital investment
- Shortages may mean lost sales due to long lead times and poor customer service
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Capacity Options
Varying workforce size by hiring or layoffs
- Match production rate to demand
- Training and separation costs for hiring and laying off workers
- New workers may have lower productivity
- Laying off workers may lower morale and productivity
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Capacity Options
Varying production rates through overtime or idle time
- Allows constant workforce
- May be difficult to meet large increases in demand
- Overtime can be costly and may drive down productivity
- Absorbing idle time may be difficult
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Capacity Options
Subcontracting
- Temporary measure during periods of peak demand
- May be costly
- Assuring quality and timely delivery may be difficult
- Exposes your customers to a possible competitor
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Capacity Options
Using part-time workers
- Useful for filling unskilled or low skilled positions, especially in services
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Demand Options
Influencing demand
- Use advertising or promotion to increase demand in low periods
- Attempt to shift
demand to slow
periods - May not be
sufficient to
balance demand
and capacity
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Demand Options
Back ordering during high-demand periods
- Requires customers to wait for an order without loss of goodwill or the order
- Most effective when there are few if any substitutes for the product or service
- Often results in lost sales
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Demand Options
Counterseasonal product and service mixing
- Develop a product mix of counterseasonal items
- May lead to products or services outside the company’s areas of expertise
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning Options
| TABLE 13.1 | Aggregate Planning Options | ||
| OPTION | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES | COMMENTS |
| Changing inventory levels | Changes in human resources are gradual or none; no abrupt production changes. | Inventory holding cost may increase. Shortages may result in lost sales. | Applies mainly to production, not service, operations. |
| Varying workforce size by hiring or layoffs | Avoids the costs of other alternatives. | Hiring, layoff, and training costs may be significant. | Used where size of labor pool is large. |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning Options
| TABLE 13.1 | Aggregate Planning Options | ||
| OPTION | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES | COMMENTS |
| Varying production rates through overtime or idle time | Matches seasonal fluctuations without hiring/ training costs. | Overtime premiums; tired workers; may not meet demand. | Allows flexibility within the aggregate plan. |
| Sub-contracting | Permits flexibility and smoothing of the firm’s output. | Loss of quality control; reduced profits; loss of future business. | Applies mainly in production settings. |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning Options
| TABLE 13.1 | Aggregate Planning Options | ||
| OPTION | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES | COMMENTS |
| Using part-time workers | Is less costly and more flexible than full-time workers. | High turnover/ training costs; quality suffers; scheduling difficult. | Good for unskilled jobs in areas with large temporary labor pools. |
| Influencing demand | Tries to use excess capacity. Discounts draw new customers. | Uncertainty in demand. Hard to match demand to supply exactly. | Creates marketing ideas. Overbooking used in some businesses. |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning Options
| TABLE 13.1 | Aggregate Planning Options | ||
| OPTION | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES | COMMENTS |
| Back ordering during high-demand periods | May avoid overtime. Keeps capacity constant. | Customer must be willing to wait, but goodwill is lost. | Many companies back order. |
| Counter-seasonal product and service mixing | Fully utilizes resources; allows stable workforce. | May require skills or equipment outside the firm’s areas of expertise. | Risky finding products or services with opposite demand patterns. |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Mixing Options to Develop a Plan
- A mixed strategy may be the best way to achieve minimum costs
- There are many possible mixed strategies
- Finding the optimal plan is not always possible
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Mixing Options to Develop a Plan
- Chase strategy
- Match output rates to demand forecast for each period
- Vary workforce levels or vary production rate
- Favored by many service organizations
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Mixing Options to Develop a Plan
- Level strategy
- Daily production is uniform
- Use inventory or idle time as buffer
- Stable production leads to better quality and productivity
- Some combination of capacity options, a mixed strategy, might be the best solution
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Methods for Aggregate Planning
- Graphical Methods
- Popular techniques
- Easy to understand and use
- Trial-and-error approaches that do not guarantee an optimal solution
- Require only limited computations
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Graphical Methods
Determine the demand for each period
Determine the capacity for regular time, overtime, and subcontracting each period
Find labor costs, hiring and layoff costs, and inventory holding costs
Consider company policy on workers and stock levels
Develop alternative plans and examine their total cost
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 1
| TABLE 13.2 | Monthly Forecasts | ||
| MONTH | EXPECTED DEMAND | PRODUCTION DAYS | DEMAND PER DAY (COMPUTED) |
| Jan | 900 | 22 | 41 |
| Feb | 700 | 18 | 39 |
| Mar | 800 | 21 | 38 |
| Apr | 1,200 | 21 | 57 |
| May | 1,500 | 22 | 68 |
| June | 1,100 | 20 | 55 |
| 6,200 | 124 |
6,200
124
= = 50 units per day
Total expected demand
Number of production days
Average requirement
=
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 1
Figure 13.3
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of
working days
Production rate per working day
Level production using average monthly forecast demand
Forecast demand
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Plan 1 – constant workforce
| TABLE 13.3 | Cost Information |
| Inventory carrying cost | $ 5 per unit per month |
| Subcontracting cost per unit | $20 per unit |
| Average pay rate | $10 per hour ($80 per day) |
| Overtime pay rate | $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day) |
| Labor-hours to produce a unit | 1.6 hours per unit |
| Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) | $300 per unit |
| Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) | $600 per unit |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Total units of inventory carried over from one
month to the next = 1,850 units
Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
| MONTH | PRODUCTION DAYS | PRODUCTION AT 50 UNITS PER DAY | DEMAND FORECAST | MONTHLY INVENTORY CHANGE | ENDING INVENTORY |
| Jan | 22 | 1,100 | 900 | +200 | 200 |
| Feb | 18 | 900 | 700 | +200 | 400 |
| Mar | 21 | 1,050 | 800 | +250 | 650 |
| Apr | 21 | 1,050 | 1,200 | –150 | 500 |
| May | 22 | 1,100 | 1,500 | –400 | 100 |
| June | 20 | 1,000 | 1,100 | –100 | 0 |
| 1,850 |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Total units of inventory carried over from one
month to the next = 1,850 units
Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
| MONTH | PRODUCTION DAYS | PRODUCTION AT 50 UNITS PER DAY | DEMAND FORECAST | MONTHLY INVENTORY CHANGE | ENDING INVENTORY |
| Jan | 22 | 1,100 | 900 | +200 | 200 |
| Feb | 18 | 900 | 700 | +200 | 400 |
| Mar | 21 | 1,050 | 800 | +250 | 650 |
| Apr | 21 | 1,050 | 1,200 | –150 | 500 |
| May | 22 | 1,100 | 1,500 | –400 | 100 |
| June | 20 | 1,000 | 1,100 | –100 | 0 |
| 1,850 |
| COST | CALCULATIONS | |
| Inventory carrying | $9,250 | (= 1,850 units carried x $5 per unit) |
| Regular-time labor | 99,200 | (= 10 workers x $80 per day x 124 days) |
| Other costs (overtime, hiring, layoffs, subcontracting) | 0 | |
| Total cost | $108,450 |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 3
In-house production = 38 units per day
x 124 days
= 4,712 units
Subcontract units = 6,200 – 4,712
= 1,488 units
| COST | CALCULATIONS | |
| Regular-time labor | $75,392 | (= 7.6 workers x $80 per day x 124 days) |
| Subcontracting | 29,760 | (= 1,488 units x $20 per unit) |
| Total cost | $105,152 |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 3
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of
working days
Production rate per working day
Level production using lowest monthly forecast demand
Forecast demand
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 4
| TABLE 13.4 | Cost Computations for Plan 3 | |||||
| MONTH | FORECAST (UNITS) | DAILY PROD RATE | BASIC PRODUCTION COST (DEMAND X 1.6 HRS/UNIT X $10/HR) | EXTRA COST OF INCREASING PRODUCTION (HIRING COST) | EXTRA COST OF DECREASING PRODUCTION (LAYOFF COST) | TOTAL COST |
| Jan | 900 | 41 | $ 14,400 | — | — | $ 14,400 |
| Feb | 700 | 39 | 11,200 | — | $1,200 (= 2 x $600) | 12,400 |
| Mar | 800 | 38 | 12,800 | — | $600 (= 1 x $600) | 13,400 |
| Apr | 1,200 | 57 | 19,200 | $5,700 (= 19 x $300) | — | 24,900 |
| May | 1,500 | 68 | 24,000 | $3,300 (= 11 x $300) | — | 24,300 |
| June | 1,100 | 55 | 17,600 | — | $7,800 (= 13 x $600) | 25,400 |
| $99,200 | $9,000 | $9,600 | $117,800 |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roofing Supplier Example 4
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of
working days
Production rate per working day
Forecast demand and monthly production
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Comparison of Three Plans
Plan 2 is the lowest cost option
| TABLE 13.5 | Comparison of the Three Plans | ||
| COST | PLAN 1 | PLAN 2 | PLAN 3 |
| Inventory carrying | $ 9,250 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
| Regular labor | 99,200 | 75,392 | 99,200 |
| Overtime labor | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hiring | 0 | 0 | 9,000 |
| Layoffs | 0 | 0 | 9,600 |
| Subcontracting | 0 | 29,760 | 0 |
| Total cost | $108,450 | $105,152 | $117,800 |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Mathematical Approaches
- Useful for generating strategies
- Transportation Method of Linear Programming
- Produces an optimal plan
- Works well for inventories, overtime, subcontracting
- Does not work when nonlinear or negative factors are introduced
- Other Models
- General form of linear programming
- Simulation
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Transportation Method
| TABLE 13.6 | Farnsworth’s Production, Demand, Capacity, and Cost Data | ||
| SALES PERIOD | |||
| MAR. | APR. | MAY | |
| Demand | 800 | 1,000 | 750 |
| Capacity: | |||
| Regular | 700 | 700 | 700 |
| Overtime | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Subcontracting | 150 | 150 | 130 |
| Beginning inventory | 100 | tires |
| COSTS | |
| Regular time | $40 per tire |
| Overtime | $50 per tire |
| Subcontracting | $70 per tire |
| Carrying cost | $ 2 per tire per month |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Transportation Example
- Important points
Carrying costs are $2/tire/month. If goods are made in one period and held over to the next, holding costs are incurred.
Supply must equal demand, so a dummy column called “unused capacity” is added.
Because back ordering is not viable in this example, cells that might be used to satisfy earlier demand are not available.
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Transportation Example
Quantities in each column designate the levels of inventory needed to meet demand requirements
In general, production should be allocated to the lowest cost cell available without exceeding unused capacity in the row or demand in the column
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Transportation Example
Table 13.7
| SUPPLY FROM | DEMAND FOR | TOTAL CAPACITY AVAILABLE (supply) | ||||
| Period 1 (Mar) | Period 2 (Apr) | Period 3 (May) | Unused Capacity (dummy) | |||
| Beginning inventory | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 100 | |
| 100 | ||||||
| Period 1 | Regular time | 40 | 42 | 44 | 0 | 700 |
| 700 | ||||||
| Overtime | 50 | 52 | 54 | 0 | 50 | |
| 50 | ||||||
| Subcontract | 70 | 72 | 74 | 0 | 150 | |
| 150 | ||||||
| Period 2 | Regular time | 40 | 42 | 0 | 700 | |
| X | ||||||
| Overtime | 50 | 52 | 0 | 50 | ||
| X | ||||||
| Subcontract | 70 | 72 | 0 | 150 | ||
| X | ||||||
| Period 3 | Regular time | 40 | 0 | 700 | ||
| X | X | |||||
| Overtime | 50 | 0 | 50 | |||
| X | X | |||||
| Subcontract | 70 | 0 | 130 | |||
| X | X | |||||
| TOTAL DEMAND | 800 | 1,000 | 750 | 230 | 2,780 |
| 700 | |
| 50 | |
| 50 | 100 |
| 700 |
| 50 |
| 130 |
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Aggregate Planning in Services
- Most services use combination strategies and mixed plans
- Controlling the cost of labor is critical
Accurate scheduling of labor-hours to assure quick response to customer demand
An on-call labor resource to cover unexpected demand
Flexibility of individual worker skills
Flexibility in rate of output or hours of work
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Five Service Scenarios
- Restaurants
Smoothing the production process
Determining the optimal workforce size
- Hospitals
- Responding to patient demand
- National Chains of Small Service Firms
- Planning done at national level and at local level
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Five Service Scenarios
- Miscellaneous Services
- Plan human resource requirements
- Manage demand
- Airline industry
- Extremely complex planning problem
- Involves number of flights, number of passengers, air and ground personnel, allocation of seats to fare classes
- Resources spread through the entire system
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Revenue Management
- Allocating resources to customers at prices that will maximize revenue
Service or product can be sold in advance of consumption
Demand fluctuates
Capacity is relatively fixed
Demand can be segmented
Variable costs are low and fixed costs are high
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Revenue Management Example
Figure 13.5
Demand Curve
Passed-up contribution
Money left on the table
Potential customers exist who are willing to pay more than the $15 variable cost of the room, but not $150
Some customers who paid $150 were actually willing to pay more for the room
Total
$ contribution
= (Price) x (50
rooms)
= ($150 - $15)
x (50)
= $6,750
Room sales
100
50
$150
Price charged for room
$15
Variable cost
of room
Price
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Total $ contribution =
(1st price) x 30 rooms + (2nd price) x 30 rooms =
($100 - $15) x 30 + ($200 - $15) x 30 =
$2,550 + $5,550 = $8,100
Revenue Management Example
Figure 13.6
Demand Curve
Price
Room sales
100
60
30
$100
Price 1
for room
$200
Price 2
for room
$15
Variable cost
of room
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Revenue Management Approaches
- Airlines, hotels, rental cars, etc.
- Tend to have predictable duration of service and use variable pricing to control availability and revenue
- Movies, stadiums, performing arts centers
- Tend to have predicable duration and fixed prices but use seating locations and times to manage revenue
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Revenue Management Approaches
- Restaurants, golf courses, ISPs
- Generally have unpredictable duration of customer use and fixed prices, may use “off-peak” rates to shift demand and manage revenue
- Health care businesses, etc.
- Tend to have unpredictable duration of service and variable pricing, often attempt to control duration of service
*
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Making Revenue Management Work
Multiple pricing structures must be feasible and appear logical to the customer
Forecasts of the use and duration of use
Changes in demand
13 - *
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.
C H A P T E R 1 3 | AG G R E GAT E P L A N N I N G A N D S & O P 521
the intermediate plan into short-term plans consisting of weekly, daily, and hourly schedules. Short-term planning techniques are discussed in Chapter 15.
Intermediate planning is initiated by a process known as sales and operations planning (S&OP).
Sales and Operations Planning Good intermediate planning requires the coordination of demand forecasts with functional areas of a !rm and its supply chain. And because each functional part of a !rm and the supply chain has its own limitations and constraints, the coordination can be dif!cult. This coordi- nated planning effort has evolved into a process known as sales and operations planning (S&OP). As Figure 13.2 shows, S&OP receives input from a variety of sources both internal and external to the !rm. Because of the diverse inputs, S&OP is typically done by cross-functional teams that align the competing constraints.
One of the tasks of S&OP is to determine which plans are feasible in the coming months and which are not. Any limitations, both within the !rm and in the supply chain, must be re- "ected in an intermediate plan that brings day-to-day sales and operational realities together. When the resources appear to be substantialy at odds with market expectations, S&OP provides advanced warning to top management. If the plan cannot be implemented in the short run, the planning exercise is useless. And if the plan cannot be supported in the long run, strategic changes need to be made. To keep aggregate plans current and to support its intermediate plan- ning role, S&OP uses rolling forecasts that are frequently updated—often weekly or monthly.
The output of S&OP is called an aggregate plan. The aggregate plan is concerned with determin- ing the quantity and timing of production for the intermediate future, often from 3 to 18 months
Figure 13.2 Relationships of S&OP and the Aggregate Plan
Sales and operations planning (S&OP) A process of balancing resources and forecasted demand, aligning an organization’s competing de- mands from supply chain to final customer, while linking strategic planning with operations over all planning horizons.
Product decisions (Ch. 5)
1st Qtr
D e
m a
n d
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
Demand forecasts, orders (Ch.4)
Process planning and
capacity decisions
(Ch. 7 and S7)
Marketplace
Master production
schedule and MRP systems
(Ch.14)
Detailed work
schedules (Ch.15)
Sales and operations planning develops the aggregate plan
for operations
Research and technology
Workforce (Ch.10)
Inventory on hand (Ch.12)
Supply-chain support (Ch.11)
External capacity (subcontractors)
Aggregate plan A plan that includes forecast levels for families of products of finished goods, inventory, shortages, and changes in the workforce.
LO1 Define sales and operations planning
M17_HEIZ1145_11_SE_C13.indd 521 12/11/12 4:49 PM