Week 2 Discussion Discussion
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–1
An Overview of Project Management 7th ed
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–2
What Is a Project?
• Project Defined (according to PMI)
– A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique
product, service, or result
• Major Characteristics of a Project
– Has an established objective
– Has a defined life span with a beginning and an end
– Requires across-the-organizational participation
– Involves doing something never been done before
– Has specific time, cost, and performance
requirements
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–3
Program versus Project
• Program Defined
– A group of related projects designed to accomplish a
common goal over an extended period of time
• Program Management
– A process of managing a group of ongoing,
interdependent, related projects in a coordinated way
to achieve strategic objectives
– Examples:
• Project: completion of a required course in project management.
• Program: completion of all courses required for a business major.
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
2
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Project Life Cycle
1–4
FIGURE 1.1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–5
Current Drivers of Project Management
• Factors leading to the increased use
of project management:
– Compression of the product life cycle
– Knowledge explosion
– Triple bottom line (planet, people, profit)
– Increased customer focus
– Small projects represent big problems
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–6
Project Governance
• Integration (or centralization) of project
management provides senior management with:
– An overview of all project management activities
– A big picture of how organizational resources are
used
– A risk assessment of their portfolio of projects
– A rough metric of the firm’s improvement in managing
projects relative to others in the industry
– Linkages of senior management with actual project
execution management
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
3
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
A Project Management Today:
A Socio-Technical Approach
• The Technical Dimension (The “Science”)
– Consists of the formal, disciplined, purely logical parts
of the process.
– Includes planning, scheduling, and controlling
projects.
• The Sociocultural Dimension (The “Art”)
– Involves contradictory and paradoxical world of
implementation.
– Centers on creating a temporary social system within
a larger organizational environment that combines the
talents of a divergent set of professionals working to
complete the project. 1–7
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Where We Are Now
2–8
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter Outline
2.1 The Strategic Management Process: An
Overview
2.2 The Need for a Project Priority System
2.3 A Portfolio Management System
2.4 Selection Criteria
2.5 Applying a Selection Model
2.6 Managing the Portfolio System
2–9
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
4
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–10
Why Project Managers Need
to Understand Strategy
• Changes in the organization’s mission and
strategy
– Project managers must respond to changes with
appropriate decisions about future projects and
adjustments to current projects.
– Project managers who understand their
organization’s strategy can become effective
advocates of projects aligned with the firm’s mission.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–11
The Strategic Management Process:
An Overview
• Strategic Management
– Requires every project to be clearly linked to strategy.
– Provides theme and focus of firm’s future direction.
• Responding to changes in the external environment— environmental scanning
• Allocating scarce resources of the firm to improve its competitive position—internal responses to new programs
– Requires strong links among mission, goals,
objectives, strategy, and implementation.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–12
Strategic
Management
Process
FIGURE 2.1
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
5
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
The Need for a Project Priority System
• The Implementation Gap
– The lack of understanding and consensus on strategy
among top management and middle-level (functional)
managers who independently implement the strategy.
• Organization Politics
– Project selection is based on the persuasiveness and
power of people advocating the projects.
• Resource Conflicts and Multitasking
– Multiproject environment creates interdependency
relationships of shared resources which results in the
starting, stopping, and restarting projects.
2–13
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–14
Benefits of Project Portfolio Management
• Builds discipline into the project selection process
• Links project selection to strategic metrics
• Prioritizes project proposals across a common set
of criteria, rather than on politics or emotion
• Allocates resources to projects that align with
strategic direction
• Balances risk across all projects
• Justifies killing projects that do not support strategy
• Improves communication and supports agreement
on project goals
EXHIBIT 2.2
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–15
Portfolio of Projects by Type
FIGURE 2.2
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
6
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–16
A Portfolio Management System
• Selection Criteria
– Financial models: payback, net present value (NPV)
– Non-financial models: projects of strategic
importance to the firm
• Multi-Criteria Selection Models
– Use several weighted selection criteria to evaluate
project proposals.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–17
Financial Models
• The Payback Model
– Measures the time the project will take to recover
the project investment.
– Uses more desirable shorter paybacks.
– Emphasizes cash flows, a key factor in business.
• Limitations of Payback:
– Ignores the time value of money.
– Assumes cash inflows for the investment period
(and not beyond).
– Does not consider profitability.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–18
Financial Models (cont’d)
• The Net Present Value (NPV) Model
– Uses management’s minimum desired rate-of-return
(discount rate) to compute the present value of all net
cash inflows.
• Positive NPV: project meets minimum desired rate of return and is eligible for further consideration.
• Negative NPV: project is rejected.
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
7
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–19
Nonfinancial Strategic Criteria
• To capture larger market share
• To make it difficult for competitors to enter the market
• To develop an enabler product, which by its introduction will
increase sales in more profitable products
• To develop core technology that will be used in next-generation
products
• To reduce dependency on unreliable suppliers
• To prevent government intervention and regulation
• To restore corporate image or enhance brand recognition
• To demonstrate its commitment to corporate citizenship and support
for community development
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–20
Multi-Criteria Selection Models
• Checklist Model
– Uses a list of questions to review potential projects
and to determine their acceptance or rejection.
– Fails to answer the relative importance or value of a
potential project and doesn’t to allow for comparison
with other potential projects.
• Multi-Weighted Scoring Model
– Uses several weighted qualitative and/or quantitative
selection criteria to evaluate project proposals.
– Allows for comparison of projects with other potential
projects.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–21
Project Screening Matrix
FIGURE 2.3
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
8
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–22
Applying a Selection Model
• Project Classification
– Deciding how well a strategic or operations project
fits the organization’s strategy
• Selecting a Model
– Applying a weighted scoring model to align projects
closer with the organization’s strategic goals
• Reduces the number of wasteful projects
• Helps identify proper goals for projects
• Helps everyone involved understand how and why a project is selected
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–23
• Sources and Solicitation of Project Proposals
– Within the organization
– Request for proposal (RFP) from external sources
(contractors and vendors)
• Ranking Proposals and Selection of Projects
– Prioritizing requires discipline, accountability,
responsibility, constraints, reduced flexibility,
and loss of power
• Managing the Portfolio
– Senior management input
– The governance team (project office) responsibilities
Applying a Selection Model (cont’d)
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–24
Project
Screening
Process
FIGURE 2.5
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
9
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–25
Managing the Portfolio System
• Senior Management Input
– Provide guidance in selecting criteria that are
aligned with the organization’s strategic goals.
– Decide how to balance available resources
among current projects.
• The Governance Team Responsibilities
– Publish the priority of every project.
– Ensure that the project selection process is open
and free of power politics.
– Reassess the organization’s goals and priorities.
– Evaluate the progress of current projects.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Balancing the Portfolio for
Risks and Types of Projects
• Bread-and-butter Projects
– Involve evolutionary improvements
to current products and services.
• Pearls
– Represent revolutionary commercial opportunities
using proven technical advances.
• Oysters
– Involve technological breakthroughs
with high commercial payoffs.
• White Elephants
– Showed promise at one time
but are no longer viable.
2–26
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–27
Where We Are Now
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
10
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter Outline
3.1 Project Management Structures
3.2 What Is the Right Project Management
Structure?
3.3 Organizational Culture
3.4 Implications of Organizational Culture for
Organizing Projects
3–28
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–29
Project Management Structures
• Challenges to Organizing Projects
– The uniqueness and short duration of projects relative
to ongoing longer-term organizational activities
– The multidisciplinary and cross-functional nature of
projects creates authority and responsibility dilemmas.
• Choosing an Appropriate Project Management
Structure
– A good system balances
the needs of the project
with the needs of the
organization.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–30
Project Management Structures (cont’d)
• Organizing Projects: Functional Organization
– Different segments of the project are delegated
to respective functional units.
– Coordination is maintained through normal
management channels.
– It is used when the interest of one functional area
dominates the project or one functional area has
a dominant interest in the project’s success.
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
11
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–31
Functional Organizations
FIGURE 3.1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–32
Functional Organization
• Advantages
1. No structural
change
2. Flexibility
3. In-depth expertise
4. Easy post-project
transition
• Disadvantages
1. Lack of focus
2. Poor integration
3. Slow
4. Lack of ownership
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–33
Project Management Structures (cont’d)
• Organizing Projects: Dedicated Project Teams
– Teams operate as separate units under the
leadership of a full-time project manager.
– In a projectized organization where projects are the
dominant form of business, functional departments
are responsible for providing support for its teams.
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
12
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–34
Dedicated Project Team
FIGURE 3.2
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–35
Project Organization: Dedicated Team
• Advantages
1. Simple
2. Fast
3. Cohesive
4. Cross-functional
integration
• Disadvantages
1. Expensive
2. Internal strife
3. Limited technological
expertise
4. Difficult post-project
transition
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–36
Projectized Organization Structure
FIGURE 3.3
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
13
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–37
Project Management Structures (cont’d)
• Organizing Projects: Matrix Structure
– Hybrid organizational structure (matrix) is overlaid on
the normal functional structure.
• Two chains of command (functional and project)
• Project participants report simultaneously to both functional and project managers.
– Matrix structure optimizes the use of resources.
• Allows for participation on multiple projects while performing normal functional duties
• Achieves a greater integration of expertise and project requirements
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–38
Matrix Organization Structure
FIGURE 3.4
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–39
Division of Project Manager and Functional
Manager Responsibilities in a Matrix Structure
TABLE 3.1
Project Manager Negotiated Issues Functional Manager
What has to be done? Who will do the task? How will it be done?
When should the task be done? Where will the task be done?
How much money is available Why will the task be done? How will the project involvement
to do the task? impact normal functional activities?
How well has the total project Is the task satisfactorily How well has the functional
been done? completed? input been integrated?
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
14
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–40
Different Matrix Forms
• Weak Form
– The authority of the functional manager predominates
and the project manager has indirect authority.
• Balanced Form
– The project manager sets the overall plan and the
functional manager determines how work to be done.
• Strong Form
– The project manager has broader control and
functional departments act as subcontractors
to the project.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–41
Project Organization: Matrix Structure
• Advantages
1. Efficient
2. Strong project focus
3. Easier post-project
transition
4. Flexible
• Disadvantages
1. Dysfunctional conflict
2. Infighting
3. Stressful
4. Slow
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–42
What Is the Right Project
Management Structure?
• Organization Considerations
– How important is the project to the firm’s success?
– What percentage of core work involves projects?
– What level of resources (human and physical)
are available?
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
15
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–43
What Is the Right Project
Management Structure? (cont’d)
• Project Considerations
– Size of project
– Strategic importance
– Novelty and need for innovation
– Need for integration (number of departments involved)
– Environmental complexity (number of external
interfaces)
– Budget and time constraints
– Stability of resource requirements
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–44
Organizational Culture
• Organizational Culture Defined
– A system of shared norms, beliefs, values, and
assumptions which binds people together, thereby
creating shared meanings.
– The “personality” of the organization that sets it
apart from other organizations.
• Provides a sense of identity to its members
• Helps legitimize the management system of the organization
• Clarifies and reinforces standards of behavior
• Helps create social order
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–45
Key Dimensions Defining an Organization’s Culture
FIGURE 3.5
Project Management 6e 1/24/2018
16
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–46
Implications of Organizational Culture
for Organizing Projects
• Challenges for Project Managers
in Navigating Organizational Cultures
– Interacting with the culture and subcultures
of the parent organization
– Interacting with the project’s clients
or customer organizations
– Interacting with other organizations
connected to the project
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–47
Cultural Dimensions of an Organization Supportive
of Project Management
FIGURE 3.7