JOB DESCRIPTIONS
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Analysis
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Importance of Job Analysis
- Writing job descriptions
- Employee selection
- Training
- Personpower planning
- Performance appraisal
- Job classification
- Job evaluation
- Job design
- Compliance with legal guidelines
- Organizational analysis
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
- Job Title
- Brief summary
- Work activities
- Tools and equipment used
- Work context
- Work performance
- Compensation information
- Job Competencies
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Job Title
- Describes the nature of the job
- Assists in employee selection and recruitment
- Affects perceptions of job worth and status
- Job evaluation results
- Employees feelings of personal worth
- Affects clarity of resumes
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Would you like to upsize that title?
| Traditional Title | Upsized Title |
| Writer | Sentence Engineer |
| Waiter | Customer-Chef Intermediary |
| Garbage Man | Sanitation Engineer |
| Secretary | Power Behind the Throne |
| Window Washer | Optical Illuminator Enhancer |
| File Clerk | Data Storage Specialist |
| Receptionist | Director of First Impressions |
| Grave Digger | Cadaver Disposal Facilitator |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Brief Summary
- Useful for recruitment advertising
- Should be written in an easy to understand style
- Jargon and abbreviations should not be used
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Work Activities
- Organize by dimensions
- Similar activities
- Similar KSAOs
- Temporal order
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Work Activities
- Task statements
- List only one activity per statement
- Statements should be able to “stand alone”
- Should be written in an easy to understand style
- Use precise rather than general words
“Responsible for”
“Oversees”
“Handles accounts”
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Tools and Equipment Used
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Work Context
- Work schedule
- Degree of supervision
- Ergonomic information
- Physical and Psychological Stress
- Indoors v. outdoors
- Lighting/heat/noise/physical space
- Clean v. dirty environment
- Standing/sitting/bending/lifting
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Work Performance
- Describes how performance is evaluated
- This section might include
- Standards used
- Frequency of evaluation
- Evaluation dimensions
- The person doing the evaluating
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Compensation Information
- Job evaluation dimensions
- Exempt status
- Pay grade
- Job group
- EEO-1 Category
Officials and managers
Professionals
Technicians
Sales workers
Office and clerical
Craft workers
Operatives
Laborers
Service workers
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Description Sections
Job Competencies
- Common Names
- Job competencies
- Knowledge, skill, ability, and other characteristics (KSAOs)
- Job specifications
- Competencies should be separated
- Those needed before hire
- Those that can be learned after hire
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Is competency modeling really different from KSAOs?
Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., Kehoe, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 703-740.
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Critiquing Job Descriptions
Exercise 2.1
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
- The verbs at the beginning of the sentences are not parallel (e.g., takes v. inspect)
- Under food preparation, “Handle problems” is too vague
- Under cleaning, “RK-9” and “10-6” are jargon and wouldn’t make sense to a person unfamiliar with the job
- Under tools, a cash register is listed yet there are no tasks reported that involve a cash register
- Under job context, lifting 80-pound crates is mentioned. There are no tasks involving lifting crates.
- Personal Requirements
- “Be flexible” is vague. Are we talking about physical flexibility or interpersonal flexibility?
- “No mental or physical problems” is a violation of the ADA.
- Counting back change is listed but there are no tasks listed that involve counting back change.
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Writing a Job Description
Exercise 2.2
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Preparing for a Job Analysis
Who Will Conduct the Job Analysis?
- Internal Department
- Human resources
- Compensation
- Training
- Engineering
- Internal task force
- Supervisors
- Employees
- Consultants
- Interns/class projects
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Preparing for a Job Analysis
Which Employees Should Participate?
- Choices
- All employees
- Random sample
- Representative sample
- Convenience sample
- Potential Differences
- Job competence
- Race
- Gender
- Education level
- Viewpoint
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Preparing for a Job Analysis
What Type of Information Should be Gathered?
- Types of Requirements
- Formal
- Informal
- Level of Specificity
- Job Loan officer
- Position Loan officer at the Boone branch
- Duty Approval of loans
- Task Investigates loan history to determine if applicant has bad credit
- Activity Runs credit histories on credit machine
- Element Enters applicant’s SSN into credit machine
- Sub element Elevates finger 30 degrees before striking key
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Conducting a Job Analysis
Basic Steps
- Step 1: Identify tasks performed
- Step 2: Write task statements
- Step 3: Rate task statements
- Step 4: Determine essential KSAOs
- Step 5: Select tests to tap KSAOs
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Conducting a Job Analysis
Step 1: Identify Tasks Performed
- Gathering existing information
- Interviewing subject matter experts (SMEs)
- Individual interviews
- SME Conferences
- Ammerman Technique
- Observing incumbents
- Job participation
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Office Space (DVD Segment 9)
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Analysis Interview (Aamodt Video)
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Conducting a Job Analysis
Step 2: Write Task Statements
- Required elements to a task statement
- Action
- Object
- Optional elements
- Where the task is done
- How it is done
- Why it is done
- When it is done
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Conducting a Job Analysis
Step 2: Write Task Statements
- Characteristics of well-written task statements
- One action and one object
- Appropriate reading level
- The statement should make sense by itself
- All statements should be written in the same tense
- Should include the tools and equipment used to complete the task
- Task statements should not be competencies
- Task statements should not be policies
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
| Poorly written task statement | Properly written task statement |
| Sends purchase requests | Sends purchase requests to the purchasing department using campus mail |
| Drives | Drives a five-speed truck to make food deliveries within the city of Toledo |
| Locks hall doors | Uses master key to lock hall doors at midnight so that nonresidents cannot enter the residence hall |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
What is Wrong with these Task Statements?
- Handles customer complaints
- Type, files, and distributes correspondence
- Utilizes decision-making skills and abilities
- In charge of the copy machine
- Uses the computer to balance department budget
- Responsible for opening and closing the office
- Greets visitors
- Examines supervisor’s daily schedule
- Oversees the office
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
To practice writing task statements, write 10 task statements for your current job or one that you have had recently
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Conducting a Job Analysis
Step 3: Rate Task Statements
- Tasks can be rated on a variety of scales
- Importance
- Part-of-the-job
- Frequency of performance
- Time spent
- Relative time spent
- Complexity
- Criticality
- Research shows only two scales are necessary
- Frequency
- Importance
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Rating Scale
| Frequency | |
| 0 | Task is not performed as part of this job |
| 1 | Task is seldom performed |
| 2 | Task is occasionally performed |
| 3 | Task is frequently performed |
| Importance | |
| 0 | Unimportant. There would be no negative consequence if the task were not performed or not performed properly |
| 1 | Important: Job performance would be diminished if task were not completed properly |
| 2 | Essential: The job could not be performed effectively if the incumbent did not properly complete this task |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Using the Ratings
- Create a chart summarizing the ratings
- Add the frequency and importance ratings to form a combined rating for each task
- Include the task in the final task inventory if:
- Average rating is greater than .5 for both frequency and importance {or}
- Combined rating is 2.0 or higher
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
| Raters | Combined Average | ||||||||
| Scully | Mulder | ||||||||
| Task # | F | I | CR | F | I | CR | F | I | CR |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Conducting a Job Analysis
Step 4: Determine Essential KSAOs
| Knowledge | A body of information needed to perform a task |
| Skill | The proficiency to perform a certain task |
| Ability | A basic capacity for performing a wide range if different tasks, acquiring a knowledge, or developing a skill |
| Other characteristics | Personal factors such as personality, willingness, interest, and motivation and such tangible factors as licenses, degrees, and years of experience |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Identifying KSAOs
Exercise 2.3
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
| Competency | KSAO |
| 1. Data entry speed | Skill |
| 2. Finger dexterity | Ability |
| 3. Driving a car | Skill |
| 4. Traffic rules | Knowledge |
| 5. A driver’s license | Other |
| 6. A friendly personality | Other |
| 7. Ten years of experience | Other |
| 8. Basic intelligence | Ability |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
| Competency | KSAO |
| 9. Physical strength | Ability |
| 10. Color vision | Ability |
| 11. Being a nonsmoker | Other |
| 12. Customer service experience | Other |
| 13. Use of PowerPoint | Skill, knowledge |
| 14. Willingness to work weekends | Other |
| 15. Spelling and grammar | Skill, knowledge |
| 16. Writing reports | Skill |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Structured Job Analysis Methods
General Information about Worker Activities
- Position Analysis Questionnaire
- 194 Items
- 6 main dimensions
- Information input
- Mental processes
- Work output
- Relationships with others
- Job context
- Other
- Easy to use
- Standardized
- Difficult to read for average employee
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Structured Job Analysis Methods
General Information about Worker Activities
- Job Structure Profile
- Designed as a replacement for the PAQ
- Easier to read than the PAQ
- Good reliability
- Job Elements Inventory
- 153 items
- 10th grade readability level
- Correlates highly with PAQ
- Functional Job Analysis
- Data
- People
- Things
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Structured Job Analysis Methods
Information about KSAOs
- Job Components Inventory
- 400 questions
- 5 main categories
- Tools and equipment used
- Perceptual and physical requirements
- Mathematical requirements
- Communication requirements
- Decision making and responsibility
- Good reliability
- Threshold Traits Analysis
- 33 items
- 5 main categories
- Physical traits
- Mental traits
- Learned traits
- Motivational traits
- Social traits
- Reliable
- Short and quick to use
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Structured Job Analysis Methods
Information about KSAOs
- Job Adaptability Inventory
- 132 items
- 8 adaptability dimensions
- Handling emergencies
- Handling work stress
- Solving problems creatively
- Dealing with uncertainty
- Learning
- Interpersonal adaptability
- Cultural adaptability
- Physically orienting adaptability
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Structured Job Analysis Methods
Information about KSAOs
- Personality-Related Position Requirements Form
- 107 items items
- 12 personality dimensions
- Fleishman Job Analysis Survey
- 72 abilities
- Good reliability
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Structured Job Analysis Methods
Information about KSAOs
- Critical Incident Technique
- Job incumbents generate incidents of excellent and poor performance
- Job experts examine each incident to determine if it is an example of good or poor performance
- 3 incumbents sort incidents into categories
- Job analyst combines and names categories
- 3 incumbents resort incidents into combined categories
- Number of incidents per category provides an idea of the importance of each category
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
| Category | Excellent | Poor | Total |
| Interest in residents | 31 | 19 | 50 |
| Availability | 14 | 27 | 41 |
| Responsibility | 12 | 20 | 32 |
| Fairness | 18 | 10 | 28 |
| Self-adherence to rules | 0 | 28 | 28 |
| Social skills | 19 | 7 | 26 |
| Programming | 13 | 7 | 20 |
| Self-confidence | 12 | 8 | 20 |
| Rule enforcement | 4 | 4 | 18 |
| Authoritarianism | 1 | 16 | 17 |
| Counseling skills | 12 | 4 | 16 |
| Self-control | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Confidentiality | 1 | 2 | 3 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Job Evaluation
Determining the Worth of a Job
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
The Ideal Compensation System
- Will attract and retain desired employees
- Will motivate current employees while also providing security
- Is equitable
- Is in compliance with legal guidelines
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Humor Break
Reaching the end of a job interview, the HR manager asked a young applicant fresh out of business school, “And what starting salary are you looking for?”
The applicant said, “In the neighborhood of $140,000 a year, depending on the benefits package.”
The interviewer said, “Well what would you say to a package of 5 weeks of vacation, 14 paid holidays, full medical and dental, company matching retirement fund to 50% of salary, and a new company car every two years – say a red Corvette?”
The applicant sat up straight and said, “Wow! Are you kidding?”
The interviewer replied, “Yeah, but you started it.”
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Determining Internal Pay Equity
- Determine compensable factors
- Determine levels for each factor
- Assign weights to each factor
- Convert weights to points for each factor
- Assign points to each level within a factor
- Assign points to jobs
- Run regression to determine how well points predict salary midpoints
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Step 1: Determining Compensable Factors
- Compensable Factors
- Examples
- responsibility
- complexity/difficulty
- skill needed
- physical demands
- work environment
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
What factors make one job worth more than another?
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Step 2: Determine Levels for Each Compensable Factor
- Education
- High school degree or less
- Two year college degree
- Bachelor’s degree
- Master’s degree
- Responsibility
- Makes no decisions
- Makes decisions for self
- Makes decisions for 1-5 employees
- Makes decisions for more than 5 employees
- Physical demands
- Lifts no heavy objects
- Lifts objects between 25 and 100 pounds
- Lifts objects more than 100 pounds
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Step 3: Determine Factor Weights
| Factor | Weight | Points |
| Education | 20 | 200 |
| Responsibility | 30 | 300 |
| Physical demands | 15 | 150 |
| Safety | 10 | 100 |
| Experience | 25 | 250 |
| Total | 100% | 1000 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Step 4: Assign Points to Each Level
| Responsibility | Points |
| Makes no decisions | 75 |
| Makes decisions for self | 150 |
| Makes decisions for 1-5 employees | 225 |
| Makes decisions for > 5 employees | 300 |
| Total | 300 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Determining Factor Weights
Exercise 2.5
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Step 5: Assign Points to Each Job
| Position: Production Supervisor | |
| Factor | Points |
| Education | 200 |
| Responsibility | 300 |
| Physical demands | 150 |
| Safety | 100 |
| Experience | 250 |
| Total | 1000 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Computing a Wage Trend Line
Exercise 2.6
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
| Job | Points | Salary |
| Computer Operator | 450 | $28,000 |
| Computer Programmer | 550 | $36,000 |
| Documents Specialist | 400 | $26,000 |
| Secretary I | 500 | $27,000 |
| Secretary II | 450 | $25,000 |
| Computer Analyst | 600 | $37,000 |
| Clerk | 350 | $25,000 |
| Supervisor | 650 | $42,000 |
| Account Representative | 500 | $28,000 |
| Customer Service Agent | 550 | $35,000 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
| 44,000 | |||||||
| 43,000 | |||||||
| 42,000 | Supervisor | ||||||
| 41,000 | |||||||
| 40,000 | |||||||
| 39,000 | |||||||
| 38,000 | |||||||
| 37,000 | Comp Anlst | ||||||
| 36,000 | Comp Prog | ||||||
| 35,000 | Cust Serv | ||||||
| 34,000 | |||||||
| 33,000 | |||||||
| 32,000 | |||||||
| 31,000 | |||||||
| 30,000 | |||||||
| 29,000 | |||||||
| 28,000 | Comp Op | Acct Rep | |||||
| 27,000 | Sec I | ||||||
| 26,000 | Doc Spec | ||||||
| 25,000 | Clerk | Sec II | |||||
| 24,000 | |||||||
| 23,000 | |||||||
| 22,000 | |||||||
| 21,000 | |||||||
| 350 | 400 | 450 | 500 | 550 | 600 | 650 | 700 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
| Job | Points | Predicted Salary | Salary | Difference |
| Computer Operator | 450 | $27,869 | $28,000 | +131 |
| Computer Programmer | 550 | $33,936 | $36,000 | +2,064 |
| Documents Specialist | 400 | $24,835 | $26,000 | +$1,165 |
| Secretary I | 500 | $30,902 | $27,000 | -$3,902 |
| Secretary II | 450 | $27,869 | $25,000 | -$2,869 |
| Computer Analyst | 600 | $36,969 | $37,000 | +$31 |
| Clerk | 350 | $21,802 | $25,000 | +$3,198 |
| Supervisor | 650 | $40,003 | $42,000 | +$1,197 |
| Account Representative | 500 | $30,902 | $28,000 | -$2,902 |
| Customer Service Agent | 550 | $33,936 | $35,000 | +$1,065 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Determining External Pay Equity
- Worth based on external market
- Determined through salary surveys
- Information obtained
- salary range
- starting salary
- actual salaries paid
- benefits
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Salary Survey Example
| # of orgs | # of emp | Weighted Average | Salary Range | |||||
| Low | Q1 | Median | Q3 | High | ||||
| Production | ||||||||
| Foreperson | 18 | 286 | $23.21 | 12.67 | 19.96 | 22.67 | 28.69 | 37.44 |
| Machinist | 9 | 419 | $20.83 | 10.28 | 17.79 | 19.63 | 22.09 | 26.80 |
| Planner | 9 | 36 | $19.73 | 17.64 | 19.68 | 21.63 | 24.59 | 37.44 |
| Production | 15 | 3,487 | $18.91 | 9.49 | 13.24 | 16.05 | 16.62 | 24.27 |
| Quality Ins | 10 | 45 | $15.23 | 11.00 | 13.84 | 15.01 | 21.31 | 24.18 |
| Maintenance | ||||||||
| Janitor | 10 | 322 | $12.00 | 8.85 | 10.02 | 11.15 | 12.04 | 20.81 |
| Maint A | 17 | 112 | $15.90 | 10.65 | 11.54 | 15.97 | 20.40 | 27.78 |
| Mechanic | 11 | 382 | $19.80 | 12.99 | 18.10 | 19.30 | 21.27 | 25.98 |
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Potential Salary Survey Problems
- Response rate
- organization conducted
- trade group conducted
- Finding comparable jobs
- Do salary surveys perpetuate discrimination?
- Do salary surveys “fix” salaries at low levels?
© 2016 Cengage Learning
*
Focus on Ethics
Compensating CEOs and Executives
- Are CEOs being paid too much or are they worth the high compensation packages they receive?
- Is it ethical that a CEO receives a bonus when employees are being laid off or having their benefits reduced?
- Does high compensation for CEOs actually increase company performance?
- Should a company’s number one focus be n making money for its shareholders?
- What might be other ethical factors surrounding this issue?