Team Concepts

profileJoJo2008
Chap0101.ppt

3-*

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Team Effectiveness

*

10-*

Knowing Objectives Doing Objectives
Describe the potential of teams to exceed the performance of individuals. Apply rules for determining the appropriateness of using a team.
Recognize the disciplines of effective teams and dysfunctions of ineffective teams. Solve common team problems.
Identify the key behaviors displayed by good team members. Apply evidence-based tactics to improve a team’s creativity.
Describe team-building interventions that have been shown to stimulate team performance. Lead an effective virtual team to overcome a given problem.
Describe the key differences between virtual and face-to-face teams.

10-*

  • Teams are a hot topic
  • When effective, teams can outperform individuals
  • However, teams often fail

10-*

The team leader is the primary determinant of team performance.

The best individual performers will create the highest performing team.

Teams are always the answer.

The key to team performance is cohesiveness.

The more the merrier.

*

10-*

  • 1) Teams are better when no individual “expert” exists
  • 2) Teams tend to be superior in stimulating innovation and creativity
  • 3) Teams can help create a context where people feel connected and valued

Describe a situation where you worked in a team

when it would have been better to work as individuals.

Question ???

10-*

  • 3 Different Types of Teams:

Teams that recommend things

Need to get off to a fast and constructive start

Need to have a clear charter and include members with the necessary skills and influence

Teams that make or do things

Most effective when they deal with “critical delivery points”

Teams that run things

Often these are not “teams” but people grouped together

The challenge is recognizing when and where a team is better than individuals

10-*

  • Team = A group of people who are collectively accountable for definable outcomes and have a high degree of interdependence and interaction

Are the people in the rowboat above

a “team”? Why or why not?

Question ???

10-*

  • Scorecard for determining whether a team is high-performing:

Production output

Member satisfaction

Capacity for continued cooperation

  • High performance team:

Produces high-quality work and has members who derive value from being part of the group, and are able to learn in ways that make them able to cooperate even better in the future

10-*

10-*

  • Research shows that people tend to work better in smaller groups
  • Ideally between 5 and 8 members

Rarely more than 10 members

Why is it hard for teams to function well

when they get beyond 10 members?

Question ???

10-*

  • Teamwork is not for everyone
  • Select team members with complementary knowledge, skills, and abilities.
  • Research findings:

Cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and agreeableness are associated with higher team member ratings and performance

10-*

  • Conflict Resolution
  • Collaborative Problem Solving
  • Communication
  • Goal Setting and Performance Management
  • Planning and Task Coordination

10-*

  • The biggest key to an effective team is having a clear and compelling goal
  • Outcome-based goals

Describe the specific outcomes by which success will be determined

How would we know success?

When would we declare victory?

  • Activity-based goals

Describe just the activities

10-*

10-*

  • Forming
  • Storming
  • Norming
  • Performing
  • Adjourning

10-*

  • Forming

Primary concern is the initial entry of members to a group

Defining roles, Determining group’s task

  • Storming

Period of high emotion and tension among the members

Member expectations need to be clarified

10-*

  • Norming

Group begins to come together as a coordinated unit

Group tries to regulate behavior

  • Performing

Emergence of a mature, organized and well-functioning team

  • Adjourning

Completing the task and ending the team

10-*

  • Norms = rules or standards of behavior (often unwritten)

Prescriptive Norms

Dictate what should be done

Proscriptive Norms

Dictate behaviors that should be avoided

Describe the norms of this class.

Describe the norms in your of friends.

Question ???

10-*

Two types of team rewards

  • Cooperative

Distributed equally

  • Competitive

Distributed based on

individual performance

Appropriateness depends on degree of task interdependence

10-*

Teams get too big

Casual or convenient team assignments

Inattention to results

Absence of commitment and trust

Unclear or diluted accountability

10-*

  • Risky shift

People in groups tend to make more extreme decisions than individuals do

Could be riskier, could be more risk-averse

  • Innocent bystander

People in a group often feel diffusion of responsibility because others are available to act

10-*

  • Choking

Pressure of others can lead to performance decrement (particularly likely when people are not experts at the task)

Social facilitation = when individual motivation and performance is enhanced by others

  • Escalation of commitment

Persisting with a losing course of action, even in the face of clear evidence of their folly

10-*

  • Conformity and Obedience

Individuals often leave decision making to the group and its hierarchy (particularly in crisis and when the individual lacks expertise)

Milgram experiments on obedience to authority

10-*

People are remarkably poor at taking the perspective of others

A minority of the group tends to do the majority of talking, leading to uneven communication

People are likely to discuss information they share rather than unique information they might have

10-*

  • Social Loafing

“Free riding”

  • Ringelmann Effect

Situation in which some people do not work as hard in groups as they do individually

  • “Sucker aversion”

To avoid being taken advantage of, some team members hedge their efforts and wait to see what other members will do

  • Identifiability

Displaying each member’s contribution to a task

One of the best ways to combat social loafing

10-*

  • Self-limiting behavior

Occurs whenever team members choose to limit their involvement in the team’s work

Unlike social loafing, team members overtly reduce their involvement

Have you ever engaged in self-limiting behaviors

while working on a team? Why or why not?

Question ???

10-*

  • Members strive so hard to maintain harmony and cohesion that they end up avoiding the discomforts of disagreement
  • Groupthink = the tendency of members in highly cohesive teams to lose their critical evaluative capabilities

10-*

  • Form of social conformity related to groupthink

Parable in which four people who do not want to go to Abilene all voluntarily go simply because they thought that is what everyone else wanted to do

10-*

  • Holding Effective Meetings

1) Ask what are the 2 or 3 most important things that need to get done

2) Determine how much time everyone has

10-*

  • Understanding Member Profiles

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a common assessment of one’s personality preferences.

Can help in teams by…

Identifying sources of conflict

Understanding communication patterns

Distributing work according to preferences

10-*

  • Building Team Cohesion

Cohesiveness = the degree to which members are attracted to, and motivated to remain part of, a group

The more difficult it is to get into a group, the more cohesive it tends to become

10-*

Performance

Group Cohesion

Low

High

Norms that Encourage Performance

Norms that Discourage Performance

10-*

  • Great teams have “productive failures” that are seen as opportunities for growth

10-*

  • 1) Correctly state the issue in terms of behaviors not generalizations about traits
  • 2) Ask yourself whether it is legitimate to give feedback
  • 3) Consider whether you have a balanced set of facts
  • 4) Create spoken norms so expectations are clear
  • 5) Social contracting = Agree on goals, tasks and consequences of not doing the work

10-*

  • Creativity = bringing new ideas into existence
  • Critical factors for promoting creativity in teams:

1) Climate of trust and risk taking

2) Disciplined use of creative problem-solving and processes

10-*

  • See mistakes as learning experiences
  • Avoid “idea killer” phrases

10-*

  • Convergent thinking = starting with a defined problem and finding the single best (correct) answer)
  • Divergent thinking = producing multiple or alternative answers from available information

Subdivision

Using analogies

Reversing the problem

10-*

  • Advantages

Save time and travel

Accommodates personal and professional lives

Brings together people from different locations

  • Five fundamental disciplines of high performance teams are even more important in virtual teams

10-*

  • Advantages:

Speed, anonymity, honesty

Can be faster than face-to-face meetings

  • Disadvantages:

Not good for establishing relationships

Hard to deal with sensitive issues

Harder to persuade team to fully commit

10-*

  • Abilene paradox
  • Activity-based goals
  • Adjourning stage
  • Analogies
  • Choking
  • Competitive team rewards
  • Convergent thinking
  • Cooperative team rewards
  • Diffusion of responsibility
  • Divergent thinking
  • Escalation of commitment
  • Forming stage
  • Groupthink
  • Identifiability
  • Innocent bystander effect
  • Norming stage
  • Norms
  • Outcome-based goals
  • Performing stage
  • Reversing the problem
  • Ringelmann effect
  • Risky shift
  • Self-limiting behavior
  • Social conformity
  • Social contracting
  • Social facilitation
  • Social loafing
  • Storming stage
  • Subdivision
  • Team
  • Virtual teams