IFSM 300 Stage 4-Assignment
Change Management
Effective strategies can help organizations and individuals adapt more
readily to the changing environment and reduce disruption to
productivity. Understanding the nature of change and implementing
effective change management strategies will also enable organizations to
increase their capacity to absorb changes.
Leadership must provide a strong, consistent vision and guide the
organization through the execution of its strategic plan. Effective project
management practices will provide more consistent delivery of successful
projects on time and within budget. Although little can be done to stem
the rate or amount of change within organizations, effective strategies
can help organizations and individuals adapt more readily to the changing
environment and reduce disruption to productivity.
What Is Change?
You can find a variety of definitions, but typically they contain elements
related to becoming different, replacing something, or altering the way
things are done. In today's business environment, more changes are
coming at a faster rate than ever before. In 1970, Alvin Toffler, a
sociologist, published his book Future Shock, in which he defined the
concept of future shock as a personal perception of "too much change in
too short a period of time" (p. 4). He predicted that as technology and
society change, the increased change rate will create a level of stress and
Learning Resource
Change Management
1 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
UMGC (n.d). Change Management. Retrieved from https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learning-resourcelist/ change-management.html?wcmmode=disabled
information overload.
In the twenty‐first century, we see the reality of Toffler's (1970/1990)
prediction. The impacts of increased computing power, the internet and
the World Wide Web, wireless connectivity, corporate mergers and
acquisitions, and global commerce are seen daily in news headlines.
Strong, effective leadership is critical to helping to guide organizations
through turbulent times to achieve business strategy and increase
competitive advantage.
Let's look at the graphic below that illustrates a typical change model
showing the process of change.
The Process of Change
In the current state, employees know the norms, or written and unwritten
rules; they are comfortable (even if the situation isn't ideal). The future
state is unknown and could be the result of implementing a new invoice‐
processing system, migrating to the next release of Windows and Office,
or introducing a new management structure and reporting relationships.
The transition state is murky and nebulous, and it is understandable that
employees have concerns and don't want to venture there, even if the
other side sounds promising.
Resistance
The reality is that human beings resist change, and it is unrealistic to think
that we can eliminate resistance. The appropriate strategy is to anticipate
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
2 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
resistance to change, recognize its characteristics, and seek to effectively
lead and guide employees through a change while minimizing disruptions
to productivity. So what happens during resistance, especially when
employees don't want the change and feel they have no control over the
situation?
Reaction to Change
Source: Adapted from Conner (1992, p. 133)
The graphic above shows the common emotional response to change
where users go through the following typical stages: immobilization,
denial, anger, bargaining, depression, testing and acceptance . The degree
to which individuals display these responses ranges from mild loss of
productivity to major dysfunction. Also, the longer an employee has been
in the current state, the more dramatic his or her response to change may
be. Many of you have been in workplace situations in which a change was
announced. Employees spend a great deal of time debating the impact of
the change, trying to guess management's ulterior motive, and asking,
"What does this mean to me?" Very little of the organization's work is
being accomplished during this time.
A key factor in resistance is feeling that we have lost control over a
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
3 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
situation. Also, change has a cumulative effect. Few of us are in the
enviable position of being able to process one change at a time, get used
to the new thing, and relax before tackling the next change. The reality is
that individuals experience ongoing change at work, at home, at school,
and in society at large. We each have our own capacity to assimilate
change, and when we reach a saturation point, we have little energy to
take on more changes.
Darryl Conner (1992), founder of ODR, Inc., an organizational consulting
firm, has spent a significant portion of his career researching the human
response to organizational change. He has identified five characteristics
of resilient people. His research shows that people who excel in these five
areas are able to move more quickly through the change cycle, maintain
higher levels of productivity, and apply lessons learned from one change
initiative to the next.
Characteristic Description
positive sees opportunities and has a sense of self‐assurance
focused has a clear vision of what he or she wants to achieve
flexible demonstrates the ability to be more fluid and less rigid when
responding to uncertainty
organized is able to develop structured approaches to ambiguous or
unclear situations
(Note: This use of the word organized focuses on making
sense out of chaos rather than on being a "neat freak.")
proactive is able to embrace or engage change rather than defend
against it
Source: Conner (1992, p. 239)
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
4 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
Although some individuals may be more innately resilient than others, it is
possible to increase one's capacity for change by focusing on these
characteristics. Those who already have a high capacity for resilience will
have an easier time increasing their capacity. Although those with a lower
initial capacity may never reach high levels of resilience, they can
improve.
We can increase our resilience by learning from more resilient individuals,
as well as learning from our own past experiences. When confronted with
a difficult situation, drawing on what helped in the past better positions
us to move through the current change. When leaders demonstrate
vision, commitment, and management, they create a culture and
environment in which employees can more quickly move through the
transition state to the future state. This reduces anxiety and decreases
the loss of productivity and dysfunctional behavior that organizational
change can instigate.
Earlier, we mentioned that resistance stems, in part, from a sense of loss
of control. In reviewing the characteristics of resilience, you will note that
they can relate to regaining one's sense of control. For example, providing
a sense of organization in ambiguous or vague situations can help restore
a sense of control. Being proactive and looking for the opportunities a
change may provide can also bring back a sense of control over one's
future. Think about the implementation of a new system to automate the
invoice creation process. Suppose you are a clerk in the order‐taking
department, and this new, automated system is going to redefine the way
orders are received. You will no longer have to type invoices. A resilient
person would see the opportunity to learn a new software tool and
increase his or her value to the department by organizing a plan to learn
the new system. A less resilient person would see only the loss of a
known job function, fear of not knowing to use the new system and
appearing “stupid,” while missing the possibility of future advancement
this change could provide.
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
5 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
Roles of Change
Resilient people also recognize that there are different roles within a
change initiative and understand the dynamics and interrelationship of
these roles. Less resilient people lack an understanding of these roles and
are often perplexed about who is filling what role. Conner (1992)
described these roles below.
Organizational Change Roles
Although each of these four roles, Sponsor, Agent, Advocate and Target,
plays a critical part in the effective implementation of organizational
change, the sponsorship role is the key. Particularly in times of change, it
is critical that the organization's leadership provides this essential
sponsorship role. Sponsorship requires more than an all‐hands email
notice announcing a new initiative; it requires sustained sponsorship
throughout the life of the change. Without a consistent, ongoing message
about the importance of the initiative, the benefits, the progress, and
rewards for success and accountabilities for failures, the initiative is likely
to fail. The employees are very comfortable in their known environment
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
6 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
and resistant to venturing into the murky unknown or ill‐defined future
state. Without sustained sponsorship, employees will quickly revert to
their comfort level.
Another element of sponsorship is cascading sponsorship. The corporate
CEO may launch a new initiative and stress its importance to his or her
executive team. The CEO expects that (1) progress will continue, and (2)
the executive team knows what to do, and he or she moves on to the
next critical business priority. A weak link or links in the executive team's
sponsorship quickly dilutes the message as it cascades through the
organization. The next thing we know, part of the organization has fallen
into the "black hole"—no information is passed along, no accountabilities
are in place to ensure compliance, and six months later, the change has
not been implemented.
Leadership is a set of processes that creates organizations in the first
place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership
defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision,
and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles (Kotter, 1996,
p. 25).
Senior executives tend to move more quickly through the change process
because of their position in the organization. William Bridges, a
management consultant and author of Managing Transitions, calls this
the marathon effect. Leadership can see the ultimate goal before others
in the organization may even know that the race is on (Bridges & Bridges,
2000, p. 30). Moreover, the change process may have been in their
thoughts for some time, so instituting the change does not seem so
precipitous to them. Therefore, senior management should be reminded
that others in the organization have less information, will be resistant to
letting go of the status quo, may lack a sense of the "big picture," and will
need time to transition to the future state.
Change Management for Systems
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
7 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
Implementation
One of the common reasons systems fail is not the technical aspects, but
rather the failure to properly communicate, prepare, and support users. A
key component of this is addressing change management in the
implementation plan. Just as a new driver needs experience actually
driving a car, a knowledge of how to operate a car, and an understanding
of the laws, system users should be prepared to be successful when a
new technology solution is introduced. This starts with the concept of
sponsorship—communicating why this change is important to the
organization or why this system is being implemented. Users want to
know what impact it will have on their jobs, how they will be trained, and
whether they will be able to do their jobs as well with the new system as
they did before. Earlier we discussed resistance to change and fear of the
unknown. If employees know how to do their work using an old
technology or even manual processes, they have adapted and get things
done one way or another, and this provides a certain level of comfort and
confidence. When faced with a new technology or system, there is a
natural fear of the unknown. Senior leadership can help reduce employee
resistance by explaining its vision and its importance to the organization's
success, and by providing assurances that employees will have access to
the appropriate communication, training, and ongoing support to help
them succeed in their jobs.
This is why the concept of cascading sponsorship is important—there
cannot be a one‐time large town‐hall meeting after which employees
never hear anything more. Ongoing communication, status updates,
training plans and schedules, etc. are needed to gain the employees'
confidence that they will be supported and can be successful.
Often when a system is implemented, the business process changes as
well. It is important that users understand how the business process is
changing in addition to how to navigate and use the new technology. A
simple analogy—think of driving to a new location you’ve never been to
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
8 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
before in a new vehicle you’ve never driven before. You receive training
on how to use the new car, but no directions or information on how to
get to the new location. Both are equally important for success.
Unfortunately, it is not uncommon that communication and training are
short‐changed at the end of a project. Time is running short, and the team
is trying to hit the planned implementation date. This can cause major
issues. The communication and training steps are equally important
milestones in the project plan. The project manager should monitor these
activities along with the more technical aspects of the project.
As we recognize that the rate or amount of change within organizations
continues to accelerate, the strategies presented here can help
organizations and individuals more readily adapt to the changing
environment and reduce disruption to productivity. Three critical areas
are:
• Leadership must demonstrate vision, commitment, and management
to guide the organization and show sustained sponsorship for change
initiatives.
• Project management practices with a focus on the people aspects
will provide more consistent delivery of successful projects on time
and within budget.
• Change management strategies to address the natural resistance to
change and fostering resilience characteristics in the corporate
culture can increase the organization's capacity to assimilate change
more quickly.
The focus on the human aspects we have discussed in this section will
help the organization as a whole and help ensure the effective
implementation of technology solutions to support the business strategy.
Ignoring the human aspects will cause even the best technology solution
to fail in meeting its objectives.
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
9 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM
References
Bridges, W., & Bridges, S. (2000, April). Leading transition: A new model
for change. Leader to Leader, 2000(16), 30‐36.
Conner, D. (1992). Managing at the speed of change. New York, NY:
Random House, Inc.
Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School
Press.
Toffler, A. J. (1990). Future shock. New York, NY: Bantam Books. (Original
work published 1970.)
© 2023 University of Maryland Global Campus
All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMGC is not responsible for the
validity or integrity of information located at external sites.
Change Management https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/ifsm/ifsm300/2228/learni...
10 of 10 3/6/2023, 11:14 AM