Exchange Rate Systems and Currency Crises
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS SEVENTEENTH EDITION
ROBERT J. CARBAUGH
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Chapter 14: Exchange- Rate Systems and Currency Crises
‹#›
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
2
Chapter Outline (1 of 2)
Exchange-Rate Practices
Choosing an Exchange-Rate System: Constraints Imposed by Free-Capital Flows
Fixed Exchange-Rate System
Floating Exchange Rates
Managed Floating Rates
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Chapter Outline (2 of 2)
The Crawling Peg
Currency Manipulation and Currency Wars
Capital Controls
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Exchange-Rate Practices (1 of 5)
In choosing an exchange-rate system, a nation must decide whether to allow its currency to be determined by market forces (floating rate) or be fixed (pegged) against some standard of value
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Exchange-Rate Practices (2 of 5)
Floating exchange-rate system
Nation must decide whether currency should float independently, float in unison with other currencies, or crawl according to predetermined formula
Pegged exchange-rate system
Fixed against some standard of value; nation must decide whether to
Anchor to single currency, basket of currencies, or gold
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Exchange-Rate Practices (3 of 5)
Members of the IMF
Exchange rates should not be manipulated
To prevent effective balance-of-payments adjustments
To gain unfair competitive advantage over other members
Members should act to counter short-term disorderly conditions in exchange markets
When members intervene in exchange markets, must take into account interests of other members
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Exchange-Rate Practices (4 of 5)
TABLE 14.1 Exchange-Rate Arrangements of IMF Members,* 2015
| Exchange Arrangement | Percentage of IMF Members | |
| Hard pegs | ||
| No separate legal tender | 6.8 | |
| Currency board | 5.8 | |
| Soft pegs | ||
| Conventional pegged (fixed) exchange rates | 23.0 | |
| Stabilized arrangement | 11.5 | |
| Crawling peg | 1.6 | |
| Crawling-like arrangement | 10.5 | |
| Pegged exchange rate within horizontal bands | 0.5 | |
| Floating | ||
| Managed floating | 19.4 | |
| Free floating | 15.7 | |
| Other | 5.2 | |
| 100.0 |
*Includes 188 member countries.
Source: International Monetary Fund, Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions, 2015. See also International Monetary Fund, Classification of Exchange Rate Arrangements and Monetary Policy Frameworks, available at http://www.imf.org/.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Exchange-Rate Practices (5 of 5)
TABLE 14.2 Choosing an Exchange-Rate System
| Characteristics of Economy | Implication for the Desired Degree of Exchange-Rate Flexibility |
| Size and openness of the economy | If trade is a large share of national output, then the costs of currency fluctuations can be high. This suggests that small, open economies may best be served by fixed exchange rates. |
| Inflation rate | If a country has much higher inflation than its trading partners, its exchange rate needs to be flexible to prevent its goods from becoming uncompetitive in world markets. If inflation differentials are more modest, a fixed rate is less troublesome. |
| Labor-market flexibility | The more rigid wages are, the greater the need for a flexible exchange rate to help the economy respond to an external shock. |
| Degree of financial development | In developing countries with immature financial markets, a freely floating exchange rate may not be sensible because a small number of foreign exchange trades can cause big swings in currencies. |
| Credibility of policy makers | The weaker the reputation of the central bank, the stronger the case for pegging the exchange rate to build confidence that inflation will be controlled. |
| Capital mobility | The more open an economy to international capital, the harder it is to sustain a fixed rate. |
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Choosing an Exchange-Rate System: Constraints Imposed by Free Capital Flows (1 of 2)
Allowing free capital flows
Constrains a country’s
Choice of exchange-rate system
Ability to operate independent monetary policy
Impossible trinity
A country can maintain only two of the following three policies:
Free capital flows
Fixed exchange rate
Independent monetary policy
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Choosing an Exchange-Rate System: Constraints Imposed by Free Capital Flows (2 of 2)
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (1 of 9)
Use of fixed exchange rates
Used primarily by small, developing nations with currencies anchored to key currency
Key currencies
Widely traded on world money markets
Have demonstrated relatively stable values over time
Widely accepted as means of international settlement
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (2 of 9)
TABLE 14.3 Key Currencies: Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves of the Member Countries of the International Monetary Fund, 2016
| Key Currency | Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves |
| U.S. dollar | 63.9% |
| Euro | 19.7 |
| British pound | 4.4 |
| Japanese yen | 4.2 |
| Canadian dollar | 2.0 |
| Australian dollar | 1.8 |
| Chinese yuan | 1.1 |
| Other | 2.9 |
| 100.0 |
Source: From Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER), International Monetary Fund, 2017, available at www.imf.org.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (3 of 9)
Anchoring to single currency
Generally done by developing nations whose trade and financial relations are mainly with a single industrial-country partner
Some nations anchor to special drawing right (SDR)
Basket of four currencies established by IMF
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (4 of 9)
Par value and official exchange rate
In terms of gold or other key currencies
Official exchange rate
Can be determined by comparing par values of two currencies
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (5 of 9)
Exchange-rate stabilization
Exchange stabilization fund
Used to defend official rate through purchases and sales of foreign currencies
Fundamental disequilibrium
Long-term, official exchange rate and the market exchange rate may diverge, reflecting changes in fundamental economic conditions like income levels, tastes, preferences, and technological factors
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (6 of 9)
Devaluation and revaluation
Devaluation-counteracting payments deficit
Revaluation-counteracting payments surplus
Depreciation and appreciation
Actual impact on market exchange rate caused by
A redefinition of par value
Changes in exchange rate
Changes in the supply or demand of foreign exchange
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (7 of 9)
Bretton Woods System of Fixed Exchange Rates
Semi-fixed exchange-rate system
Adjustable pegged exchange rates
Currencies tied to each other
Nation could repeg its exchange rate via devaluation or revaluation policies
Use fiscal and monetary policies first to correct payment imbalances
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (8 of 9)
Bretton Woods System (cont.)
Agree to defend existing par values
Correct fundamental disequilibrium by repegging currencies
Up to 10% without permission from IMF
By greater than 10% with the fund’s permission
Par value set in terms of gold or gold content of U.S. dollar in 1944
Market exchange rates were almost but not completely fixed
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Fixed Exchange-Rate System (9 of 9)
Bretton Woods System (cont.)
Operational problems (cont.)
Currency devaluation indicated failure of domestic policies
Currency revaluations unacceptable to exporters
Repegging exchange rates only as a last resort
Difficult because of adjustable pegged rates
Speculators had incentive to move out of weakening currency
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Floating Exchange Rates (1 of 4)
Floating exchange rates (flexible)
Currency prices established daily in foreign-exchange market
Without restrictions imposed by government policy
Equilibrium exchange rate
Demand for and supply of home currency
Changes in exchange rate
Correct a payments imbalance
Shifts in imports and exports of goods, services, and short-term capital movements
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Floating Exchange Rates (2 of 4)
Trade restrictions, jobs, and floating exchange rates
During economic downturns, labor unions lobby for import restrictions to save jobs of domestic workers
Implementation of import restrictions
Helps one industry
Shifts jobs from other industries to protected industry
Has no significant impact on aggregate employment
Leads to short-term employment gains in protected industry being offset by long-term employment losses in other industries
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Floating Exchange Rates (3 of 4)
Arguments for floating rates
Respond quickly to changing supply and demand conditions
Clear the market of shortages or surpluses of a given currency
Simplified institutional arrangements that are relatively easy to enact
Continuous adjustment in the balance of payments
Partially insulate home economy from external forces
Nations have greater freedom to pursue policies that promote domestic balance
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Floating Exchange Rates (4 of 4)
Arguments against floating rates
Unregulated market may lead to wide fluctuations in currency values and discourage foreign trade and investment
Inflationary bias; monetary authorities may lack financial discipline
Greater freedom for domestic financial management
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Managed Floating Rates (1 of 6)
Managed floating system
Informal guidelines established by IMF for coordination of exchange-rate policies
Nations might intervene in exchange markets to avoid exchange-rate alterations that would weaken their competitive position
Concern that floats over time might lead to disorderly markets with erratic fluctuations in exchange rates
Nation can alter degree to which it intervenes in foreign-exchange market
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Managed Floating Rates (2 of 6)
When U.S. suspended gold convertibility & allowed overvalued dollar to float, hoped free market adjustment would result in depreciation of dollar against undervalued currencies
Clean float
Market solution; but foreign central banks refused to permit and intervened in exchange market
Dirty float
Interference in market; forces of supply & demand not allowed to play equilibrating role
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Managed Floating Rates (3 of 6)
Leaning against the wind
Intervene to reduce short-term fluctuations in exchange rates without attempting to adhere to any particular rate over long term
Target exchange rates
To reflect long-term economic forces that underlie exchange-rate movements
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Managed Floating Rates (4 of 6)
Managed floating rates in the short run and long run
Market intervention stabilizes exchange rates in short term; allows market forces to determine exchange rates in long term
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Managed Floating Rates (5 of 6)
Exchange-rate stabilization & monetary policy
To stabilize a currency’s exchange value; expansionary/contractionary monetary policy
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Managed Floating Rates (6 of 6)
Is exchange-rate stabilization effective?
May be useful when exchange rate is under speculative attack
May be helpful in coordinating private-sector expectations
Research provides some support for short-term effectiveness
Does not support long-term intervention
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
The Crawling Peg
Crawling peg system
Small, frequent changes in par value of currency to correct balance-of-payments disequilibrium
Process of exchange-rate adjustment is continuous for all practical purposes
Used by nations with high inflation rates
Combines flexibility of floating rates with stability usually associated with fixed rates
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Currency Manipulation and Currency Wars (1 of 3)
Currency manipulation
Purchase or sale of currency by fiscal or monetary authority to influence its value
In 2000s, U.S. accused Japan, China, South Korea, Singapore, and other countries of keeping the exchange values of their currencies artificially low in order to boost international competitiveness and trade surpluses.
U.S. has been doing the same thing
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Currency Manipulation and Currency Wars (2 of 3)
Is China a currency manipulator?
U.S.: China manipulates the yuan
Yuan significantly undervalued relative to dollar
U.S. exports to China more expensive
Harms U.S. production and employment
Chinese goods cheaper for American consumers
More imports
Huge trade surplus with United States
Large accumulation of dollar reserves
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Currency Manipulation and Currency Wars (3 of 3)
Is China a currency manipulator?
Others say there’s little or no connection between yuan and health of U.S. manufacturing
Other analysts contend that China’s currency intervention yields positive results for the U.S. economy
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Currency Crises (1 of 4)
Major currency crises have been common in recent years
Currency crisis (speculative attack)
Weak currency experiences heavy selling pressure
Some reasons: sizable losses in foreign reserves held by country’s central bank
Depreciating exchange rates in forward market
Currency crisis can decrease growth of GDP by 6% or more
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Currency Crises (2 of 4)
Crisis ends when selling pressure stops; ways to end pressure include:
Devaluation: establish new exchange rate at sufficiently depreciated level
Adoption of floating exchange rate
Imposition of restrictions on ability of people to buy and sell foreign currency
Use of loan to bolster foreign reserves of monetary authority
Restoration of confidence in existing rate
Crisis ending in devaluation: currency crash
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Currency Crises (3 of 4)
Sources of currency crises
Currency speculators
Budget deficits financed by inflation
Weak financial systems
Recently deregulated financial systems
A weak economy
Political factors
External factors
Choice of an exchange-rate system
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Currency Crises (4 of 4)
Speculators attack East Asian currencies
July 1997: Thai abandoned baht’s peg to USD
October 1997: Baht depreciated by 60% against USD
Triggered wave of speculation against other Southeast Asian currencies
Some economists argue abandoning fixed exchange rates not in long-term interest
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Capital Controls (1 of 5)
Capital controls (exchange controls)
Government-imposed barriers
To foreign savers investing in domestic assets
To domestic savers investing in foreign assets
Government directly bypasses market forces
Direct controls on international transactions
Government allocates foreign exchange among traders and investors
Government sets prices
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Capital Controls (2 of 5)
Advantages
Enables government to influence its payments position by regulating amount of foreign exchange allocated to imports or capital outflows
Enables government to encourage or discourage certain transactions by offering different rates for foreign currency for different purposes
Gives domestic monetary and fiscal policies greater freedom in their stabilization roles
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Capital Controls (3 of 5)
Disadvantages
Capital outflows may further increase after controls are implemented
Result in evasion
Provide government officials false sense of security that they do not have to reform their financial systems to ameliorate crisis
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Capital Controls (4 of 5)
Controls on capital inflows receive more support
If speculative capital cannot enter country, it cannot suddenly leave and create crisis
But problematic
Can prevent funds that would be used to finance productive investment opportunities from entering
Are seldom effective because private sector finds ways to evade them and move funds into country
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Capital Controls (5 of 5)
Should foreign-exchange transactions be Taxed?
A tax would increase cost of these transactions
Discourage massive responses to minor changes
Dampen volatility of exchange rates
Drawbacks:
We do not know how much volatility is excessive or irrational
Tax could impose burden on countries rationally borrowing overseas
Difficult to implement
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates (1 of 8)
Currency board
Monetary authority that issues notes and coins convertible into foreign anchor currency at fixed exchange rate
Can operate in place of central bank or as a parallel issuer alongside central bank
Takes over role of central bank in strengthening currency of developing countries
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates (2 of 8)
Currency board (cont.)
Has no discretionary powers
Sole function: to exchange its notes and coins for the anchor at fixed rate
Does not lend to government, which can finance spending only by taxing or borrowing, not by printing money and thereby creating inflation
Results from stipulation that backing of domestic currency must be 100%
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates (3 of 8)
Currency board (cont.)
Monetary policy on autopilot
When anchor currency flows in, Board issues more domestic currency
Interest rates fall
When anchor currency flows out,
Interest rates rise
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates (4 of 8)
Benefits of currency board system
Making nation’s currency & exchange-rate regimes more rule bound & predictable
Placing upper bound on nation’s base money supply
Arresting inflationary tendencies
Forcing government to restrict borrowing to what foreign and domestic lenders are willing to lend at market interest rates
Engendering confidence in soundness of nation’s money
Creating confidence & promoting trade, investment, & economic growth
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates (5 of 8)
Objections to currency board system:
Prevents country from pursuing a discretionary monetary policy
Reduces economic independence
Renders country susceptible to financial panics
Lacks lender of last resort
Creates colonial relation with anchor currency
Example=Argentina
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates (6 of 8)
Dollarization
When residents of foreign country use dollar alongside or instead of domestic currency; can be full or partial
Benefits of dollarization
Credibility and policy discipline
Avoids capital outflows
Decreased transaction costs
Lower rate of inflation
Greater openness
Balance-of-payments crises minimized
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates (7 of 8)
Effects of dollarization on foreign country
Country must be treated like one of 50 states
Monetary policy of Federal Reserve national in scope
Federal Reserve
Not a lender of last resort for foreign nations
No seigniorage from its monetary system
State expenditures not affected
Can establish own trade policies
Cannot print more domestic currency to finance budget deficits; must exercise caution in spending
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›
Increasing the Credibility of Fixed Exchange Rates (8 of 8)
Effects of dollarization on U.S.
For each dollar sent abroad, Americans enjoy one-time increase in amount of goods and services they can consume
U.S. gets an interest-free loan from foreign country
Might hinder formulation and execution of monetary policy by Federal Reserve
Could result in more pressure on Federal Reserve to conduct policy according to interests of foreign country
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
‹#›