week13
Managing and Using Information Systems: A Strategic Approach – Sixth Edition
Keri Pearlson, Carol Saunders, and Dennis Galletta
© Copyright 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chapter 11 Project Management
2
Rural Payments Agency Case
What were the recurring problems with the RPA’s Single Payment Scheme project between 2006 and 2014?
What system was rolled out in 2015 to solve the problems? How did it solve the problems?
What problems occurred in 2015? What was the solution?
What were the causes of the problems?
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
3
Inequities, inaccurate property data, and delays in payments. Led many farmers to go bankrupt.
Basic Payment Scheme. It fixed inequities and allowed richer data to be collected (vegetation and terrain).
Identity verification wasn’t working well, the system was at capacity and slow. The solution was to allow farmers to submit paper, essentially going backwards 10 years.
Implementation began before the specs were agreed-on. Testing was inadequate. Warnings were ignored.
3
Failed IS Projects
Standish Group found that:
67% of all software projects are “challenged!”
Late, or
Over budget, or
Don’t perform
Even one failure could endanger a firm!
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4
4
Definition of “Project”
“[A] project is a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service.”
Temporary—every project has a definite beginning and a definite end.
Unique—the product or service is different in some distinguishing way from all similar products or services.”
-Project Management Institute (1996)
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5
5
Project vs Operations
| Characteristics | Operations | Projects |
| Purpose | Sustain the firm | Reach a goal |
| When to change | When operations no longer serve the goals | When a goal is reached |
| Quality control | Formal | Informal |
| Tasks | Repetitive | Unique |
| Duration | Ongoing | Temporary |
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6
Project Stakeholders
Anyone (or any firm)
Involved
With affected interests
Obvious players:
Project manager, project team
Project sponsor (general manager funding it)
Customers (huge variety)
Employees
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7
Programs vs Projects
A program is a set of related projects that accomplish a strategic objective
Examples: TQM; workplace safety
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8
Project Management
“Application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to project activities in order to meet project requirements.”
Trade-offs must be made
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
9
Pick any two!
Time
Cost
Scope
Project Triangle
10
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
10
Picking any two
Fast and cheap: It won’t be good!
Slapped together or using interns
Fast and good: It won’t be cheap!
Purchase solution/hire “rock star” skilled team
Cheap and good: It won’t be fast!
This option is possible if you would wait for open source solution or use
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
11
Project Management Software
Top five PM systems
Microsoft Project
Atlassian Jira
Podio
Smartsheet
Basecamp
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
12
Project Management Office
Project support
Project management process and methods
Training
Project management home base
Internal consulting and mentoring
Project management software tools and support
Portfolio management (managing multiple projects)
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13
Essential Elements
Project management
Project team
Project cycle plan
Common project vocabulary
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
14
Element 1: Project Management
Identifying requirements
Defining the team’s structure
Assigning team members
Managing risks / leveraging opportunities
Measuring the project’s status
Making the project visible to others
Comparing project status against plan
Taking corrective action when necessary
Providing project leadership
Require planning
Require
taking
action
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15
Project Leadership
Strong project leaders focus, align, and motivate members by managing
Team composition
Reward systems
Strong processes trade off against strong leadership (next slide)
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
16
16
Project
Leadership
Project
Management Process
More leadership
Needed
Less leadership
Needed
No PM process
Team is new to PM process
Team does not value process
PM process exists
Team is fully trained in process
Team values process
Project leadership vs. project management process
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
17
17
Element 2: Project Team
Helpful: collect a set of people with the needed
Skills
Knowledge
Experiences
Capabilities
They must also represent their departments
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18
Element 3: Project Cycle Plan
Organizes the steps and defines dates
Breaks work into phases
End is “go live” date
“Control gates:” ready to move to next phase?
Tools include PERT/GANTT
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
19
PERT
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20
Gantt
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21
Template – Other Views
Unfreezing
Change
Refreezing
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
22
Element 4: Common Project Vocabulary
Make sure everyone knows what the following mean:
“End of year”
“Divestment” vs “sale”
“Acquisition” vs “purchase”
“Customer” vs “user”
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23
Difficulties
IT projects are difficult to estimate and most fail to meet their schedules and budgets
Highly interactive, complex sets of tasks
Closely interrelated with each other (coupled)
Most projects cannot be made more efficient simply by adding labor
Some are actually slowed down (Brooks’ Law)
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
24
24
Systems Development Life Cycle
SDLC typically consists of typical phases such as:
Initiation of the project
The requirements definition phase
The functional design phase
The system is actually built
Verification phase
The “cut over:” The new system is put in operation
The maintenance and review phase
Different models have different numbers of phases
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
25
25
Limitations of SDLC
Traditional SDLC methodology for current IT projects are not always appropriate:
Sometimes costs are difficult to estimate
Sometimes uniqueness makes previous experience hard or impossible to find
Objectives may reflect a scope that is
Too broad (can’t solve it), or
Too narrow (not ambitious enough)
Might take too long when the business environment is very dynamic
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
26
26
Alternative Approaches – for speed
Iterative approaches enable evolutionary development
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27
27
Other Approaches
Prototyping
Build a high-level version of the system very quickly and get feedback
Advantages:
User involvement early and throughout the development process
Disadvantages:
Documentation may be difficult to write
Users may not have a realistic scope of the system while making decisions
RAD (Rapid Application Development) prototyping + 4-step SDLC
Like prototyping, RAD uses iterative development tools to speed up development:
GUI, reusable code, code generation, databases, testing, debugging
Goal is much faster building of the system
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
28
28
Other Approaches (continued)
JAD (Joint Application Development) – IBM
Users are involved throughout the process
“Agile” approaches speed things up
XP (Extreme Programming), Scrum, etc.
29
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Other Approaches (continued)
User-centered design
Focuses on usability but uses many of the tools of RAD, JAD, Agile, prototyping
Users participate and continuously evaluate usability
Usability.gov provides 209 guidelines
Technology is advancing so they are dated (e.g., touchscreen tablets are not included)
“How or why” for touch PC O/S not yet settled
Requires multidisciplinary approach: psychology, graphic art, Internet technologies, business needs, etc.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
30
Other Approaches (continued)
Open source approach
Uses crowdsourcing
Code is available for all to see and improve
Linux: the basis for
Android
Some Garmin GPS
Some Sony TVs
OS/X is based on BSD
BSD and Linux come from Unix
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
31
Comparison of approaches
| Methodology | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| SDLC | Structured approach Phase milestones and approvals Uses system approach Focuses on goals and trade-offs Emphasizes documentation Requires user sign-offs | Systems often fail to meet objectives Needed skills are often difficult to obtain Scope may be defined too broadly or too narrowly Very time consuming |
| Agile Development | Good for adapting to changing requirements Works well when user requirements change continuously Allows face-to-face communication and continuous inputs from users Speeds up development process Users like it | Hard to estimate system deliverables at start of project Under-emphasizes designing and documentation Easy to get project off-track if user goals are unclear |
| Prototyping | Improved user communications Users like it Speeds up development process Good for eliciting system requirements Provides a tangible model to serve as basis for production version | Often under-documented Not designed to be an operational version Often creates unrealistic expectations Difficult-to-manage development process Integration often difficult Design flaws more prevalent than in SDLC Often hard to maintain |
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
32
What Makes a Project Risky?
Risk Framework
Complexity
Many parts? Impacts on rest of system? Global? Unfamiliar hardware/software/databases? Changing requirements?
Clarity
Hard to define the purpose, input, and output?
Size
Cost, staff, duration, team, departments affected, lines of code
They are geometric, not linear (additive):
Having all three of these would be much more than three times as bad as one of these.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
33
33
Managing Risk from Complexity
Strategies to deal with complexity:
Leverage the Technical Skills of the Team such as having a leader or team members who have had significant experience
Rely on Consultants and Vendors – for additional expertise
Integrate Within the Organization such as
Having frequent team meetings
Extensive documentation
Regular technical status reviews
34
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
34
Managing Risk from Clarity
Strategies to deal with low clarity
Rely more heavily upon the users to define system requirements
Manage stakeholders by balancing the disparate goals
Sustain Project Commitment
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
35
35
Project Commitment – Important for project success
| Determinant | Description | Examples | More likely for commitment if: |
| Project | Objective attributes of the project | Cost, benefits, expected difficulty, and duration | There is a large potential payoff. |
| Psychological | Factors managers use to convince themselves things are not so bad | Previous experience, personal responsibility for outcome, and biases. | There is a previous history of success. |
| Social | Elements of the various groups involved in the process | Rivalry, norms for consistency, and need for external validation | External stakeholders have been publicly led to believe the project will be successful. |
| Organizational | Structural attributes of the organization | Political support, and alignment with values and goals | There is strong political support from executive levels. |
| Cultural | Cultural attributes | Appreciation for teamwork or a focus on technical issues | There is a culture of teamwork. |
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
36
Pulling the Plug
Often projects in trouble persist long after they should have been abandoned—Pull the plug!
Many projects are 99% complete for 50% of the project!
People can go to great lengths to sustain a doomed project when there are
Sunk costs
High penalties for failure
Emotional attachment to the project by powerful individuals
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
37
37
Four dimensions of success
Shenhar, Dvir and Levy’s (1998) four dimensions of success:
Resource constraints: does the project meet the time and budget criteria?
Impact on customers: how much benefit does the customer receive from the project?
Business success: how high and long are the profits produced by the project?
Prepare for the future: has the project enabled future success? Future impact?
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38
38
Figure 11.11 Success dimensions for various project types.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
39
Managing and Using Information Systems: A Strategic Approach – Sixth Edition
Keri Pearlson, Carol Saunders, and Dennis Galletta
© Copyright 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.