HRM
Chapter 10 Coaching and Performance Management
Werner
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Learning Objectives
Define coaching and performance management, and explain the need for such activities in organizations
Explain how to analyze employee performance to set the stage for a coaching discussion
Describe the steps involved in coaching to improve poor performance
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Identify the skills necessary for effective coaching
Identify the critical elements in a performance management system
Describe the evidence supporting the effectiveness of coaching and performance management
2
Agree or Disagree?
Most employees already know what they should do and how to do it
Performance management is simply a matter of expecting tasks to be done correctly and on time
If the problem does not go away, the employee must be stupid, lazy, or have a “bad attitude.” Therefore, punishment is called for
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
The Need for Coaching
“Yelling, Screaming, and Threatening” can actually create or compound performance problems, rather than solve them
The reality
Sometimes employees know what to do and how to do it
Sometimes they do not
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Too many managers use a negative approach to managing behavior.
Alternative: conflict avoidance – and overload the good workers.
Sometimes the only time the supervisor talks to a worker is when there is a problem.
4
Coaching: A Positive Approach
Managers must take an active and positive role in employee performance to ensure that goals are met
Their role: Empowering employees
Direct supervisor bears primary responsibility for coaching
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Participative Management
Employee engagement and self-directed teams
Requires supervisors, managers and executives to function as coaches
5
HRD3eCH10 Contributed by Wells Doty, Ed.D. Clemson Univ
6
Performance Management and Coaching
Performance appraisal
The first step
Performance management
Employee goal setting
Coaching
Rewards
Individual development
Coaching
A process that encourages employees to:
Accept responsibility for their own performance
Enable them to achieve and sustain superior performance
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Treat them as partners in working toward organizational goals and effectiveness
7
Discussion
Why is it important to coach employees with performance problems as well as employees who are performing well?
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Coaching to Improve Poor Performance
Defining poor performance
Responding to poor performance
Conducting a coaching analysis
Using the coaching discussion
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Three issues:
The definition of poor performance
How coaching analysis can be conducted to determine the cause of performance problems or issues
How the coaching discussion can be used to improve performance
Some amount of poor performance seems to be a fact of life
9
Defining Poor Performance
Definition: “Specific, agreed upon deviations from expected behavior.”
Performance must be evaluated against some standard or expected level of performance.
Standards and expected levels of performance must be known by the supervisor and the worker.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
If the behavior meets or exceeds the standard, then it is typically considered good
If the behavior fails to meet the standard, it may be considered poor
10
HRD3eCH10 Contributed by Wells Doty, Ed.D. Clemson Univ
11
Types of Standards
Absolute
Same scale or standard is applied to all subordinates.
Relative
Performance is evaluated relative to the performance of others.
Deviant Workplace Behavior (DWB)
Voluntary behavior that violates significant organizational norms, and in doing so threatens the well-being of an organization, its members, or both
Four types of DWB
Production deviance
Property deviance
Political deviance
Personal aggression
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Production Deviance
Leaving early, intentionally working slowly
Property Deviance
Sabotaging equipment, lying about hours worked
political deviance
Showing favoritism, blaming or gossiping about coworkers
Personal aggression
Sexual harassment, verbal abuse, endangering or stealing from coworkers
12
Responding to Poor Performance
Causal Attribution Theory
People assign causes to behavior.
Different actions are likely based on internal versus external attributions.
Fundamental Attribution Error
Assumes or attributes behavior comes from a cause within a person.
Supervisor may overlook other causes.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A manager who commits the fundamental attribution error will tend to overlook these possibilities and instead try to find a cause within the subordinate, such as laziness or carelessness
13
Exercise
Think about the last time you had a problem with your own performance, either on the job or in one of your classes. Identify the cause or causes of the problem, and state what you think could be done to correct it.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Coaching Analysis
Coaching Analysis
The process of 1) analyzing the factors (including internal and external factors) that contribute to unsatisfactory performance and 2) deciding on the appropriate response to improve performance
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Nine Steps to Conduct a Coaching Analysis
Identify the unsatisfactory employee performance.
Decide if it’s worth YOUR time and effort.
Find out if the employees knows that their work is not satisfactory.
Does the employee know what is to be done?
Does employee know HOW to do the job?
Are there obstacles beyond the employee’s control?
Does a negative consequence follow effective performance?
Does a positive consequence follow nonperformance?
Could the employee do it if he or she wanted to?
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Exercise
Think about the last time you had a problem with your own performance, either on the job or in one of your classes. Using the nine-step coaching analysis model, try to identify the cause or causes of the problem, and state what you think could be done to correct it.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Two Follow Up Questions
Can the job or task be modified or simplified?
What if the problem persists?
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Can the Job or Task Be Simplified? If the job can be modified or simplified the job may be done correctly
18
HRD3eCH10 Contributed by Wells Doty, Ed.D. Clemson Univ
19
What if Coaching Fails?
Transfer the employee to work that the employee can do.
Terminate for sub-standard performance.
Have adequate documentation of coaching efforts to support termination!
How to Conduct a Coaching Discussion and Follow-Up
Identify the employee performance issue to be discussed.
Seek the employee’s reaction and response to the supervisor’s presentation of the performance issue
Seek out the employee’s agreement that a performance problem exists
Mutually discuss alternative solutions to the issue
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Be specific, factual, respectful, and supportive in presenting this issue
Seek the employee’s reaction and response to the supervisor’s presentation of the performance issue
20
How to Conduct a Coaching Discussion and Follow-Up (cont.)
Mutually agree on goals to set, actions that will be taken, and the follow-up plan that will be used to resolve this issue
Follow up on this issue at the agreed-upon time and in the agreed-upon way
Recognize and reward employee improvements and achievements as they occur
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Exercise
Suppose you are a restaurant manager who is conducting a coaching discussion with one of your servers about the server’s repeated failure to complete store-closing operations before leaving for the night. You have conducted a coaching analysis and have determined that the server is able to complete these responsibilities, that all obstacles to doing so have been removed, and that this is an important part of a server’s job in your restaurant.
Describe how you would get the server to agree that a problem exists, and what you would do if the server refuses to acknowledge that a problem exists. Describe the options available to you in dealing with this situation. Which option would you select? Support your choice.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Exercise: Effective Coaches
In your opinion, what are the most important qualities for an effective coach to possess?
Are coaching characteristics innate or can they be learned?
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Because coaching skills can be learned, the use of coaching training is important in ensuring the effective use of coaches. Next we will discuss some coaching competencies.
23
How to Promote Good Coaching
For coaching to be most effective, top managers and HRD professionals must ensure that:
An effective performance management system is operating within the organization
The organization rewards managers and supervisors for effective coaching
All managers and supervisors are properly trained in coaching skills and techniques
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
An effective performance management system is operating within the organization
The organization’s recognition and rewards system properly rewards managers and supervisors for effective coaching
All managers and supervisors are properly trained in coaching skills and techniques
24
How to Promote Good Coaching (cont. 2)
Supervisors prepare in advance for the coaching discussion
Supervisor comments are constructive, helpful, and supportive
Supervisors provide specific and behavioral feedback on employee performance
Employees are involved in the coaching discussion
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
How to Promote Good Coaching (cont. 3)
Specific goals are set during the discussion
An action plan is jointly established between the employee and the supervisor
Coaching discussions are followed up, to ensure that the employee is following the action plan, and to recognize performance improvements when they occur
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Skills for Effective Face-to-Face Communication
Basic attending skills to help involve the employee in the discussion
Provide feedback
Paraphrase what employee just said
Reinforces the employee for expressing feelings
Use open and closed questions to support your purpose
Help identify potential areas of organizational difficulty
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Six Skills of Effective Face-to-Face Communication
Basic attending skills to help involve the employee in the discussion; these include:
A slight, but comfortable, forward lean of the upper body and trunk
Maintaining eye contact
Speaking in a warm but natural voice
Using sufficient encouragers (e.g., head nods, saying yes, and uh-huh)
Staying on the topic
SOURCES: Kikoski, J. F., & Litterer, J. A. (1983). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview. Public Personnel Management Journal, 12, 33–42; Kikoski, J. F. (1999). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview: Face-to-face communication for public managers in the culturally diverse workplace. Public Personnel Management, 28(2), 301–322; McMahon, G. (2007, June). Unlocking potential. Training Journal, 52–55; Gordon, M.E., & Stewart, L. P. (2009). Conversing about performance: Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 473–501.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Six Skills of Effective Face-to-Face Communication(cont. 2)
Feedback
Providing clear and concrete data
Using a nonjudgmental attitude
Using timely, present-tense statements
“Max, I just made some suggestions for how you can present your ideas more clearly. But you don’t seem interested. How can I help you improve your presentations?”
As opposed to, “Your last four presentations were disasters. I won’t tolerate another one.”)
Providing feedback that deals with correctable items over which the employee has some control
SOURCES: Kikoski, J. F., & Litterer, J. A. (1983). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview. Public Personnel Management Journal, 12, 33–42; Kikoski, J. F. (1999). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview: Face-to-face communication for public managers in the culturally diverse workplace. Public Personnel Management, 28(2), 301–322; McMahon, G. (2007, June). Unlocking potential. Training Journal, 52–55; Gordon, M.E., & Stewart, L. P. (2009). Conversing about performance: Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 473–501.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Six Skills of Effective Face-to-Face Communication(cont. 3)
Paraphrasing: a concise restatement, in your own words, of what the employee has just said
Paraphrasing helps clarify the issue
Lets the employee know you understand what has been said
Encourages him or her to continue
Paraphrases should be nonjudgmental and matter-of-fact
SOURCES: Kikoski, J. F., & Litterer, J. A. (1983). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview. Public Personnel Management Journal, 12, 33–42; Kikoski, J. F. (1999). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview: Face-to-face communication for public managers in the culturally diverse workplace. Public Personnel Management, 28(2), 301–322; McMahon, G. (2007, June). Unlocking potential. Training Journal, 52–55; Gordon, M.E., & Stewart, L. P. (2009). Conversing about performance: Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 473–501.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Six Skills of Effective Face-to-Face Communication(cont. 4)
Reflection of feeling: reinforces the employee for expressing feelings and encourages open communication
Reflections of feeling have a structure:
Employee’s name or pronoun
Stem (e.g., “It sounds as if you feel …”)
Label for the emotion
Final stem to check whether you understood employee correctly (e.g., “Am I right?”)
An example: “Maria, you seem very nervous about working in front of others. Would you like to talk about that?”
SOURCES: Kikoski, J. F., & Litterer, J. A. (1983). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview. Public Personnel Management Journal, 12, 33–42; Kikoski, J. F. (1999). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview: Face-to-face communication for public managers in the culturally diverse workplace. Public Personnel Management, 28(2), 301–322; McMahon, G. (2007, June). Unlocking potential. Training Journal, 52–55; Gordon, M.E., & Stewart, L. P. (2009). Conversing about performance: Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 473–501.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Six Skills of Effective Face-to-Face Communication(cont. 5)
Open and closed questions to support your purpose
Open questions (e.g., those beginning with How, Would, Could, or Why) encourage employees to talk and share their ideas (e.g., “Why do you think that is?”)
Closed questions (e.g., those beginning with Did, Is, Are, or How many) invite a response of a few words, which can be used to clarify, identify specific points, and speed the discussion (e.g., “Did you close the sale?”)
SOURCES: Kikoski, J. F., & Litterer, J. A. (1983). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview. Public Personnel Management Journal, 12, 33–42; Kikoski, J. F. (1999). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview: Face-to-face communication for public managers in the culturally diverse workplace. Public Personnel Management, 28(2), 301–322; McMahon, G. (2007, June). Unlocking potential. Training Journal, 52–55; Gordon, M.E., & Stewart, L. P. (2009). Conversing about performance: Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 473–501.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Six Skills of Effective Face-to-Face Communication(cont. 6)
Focusing helps: identify potential areas of organizational difficulty (person, problem, context, other, and self) and ways to deal with each
SOURCES: Kikoski, J. F., & Litterer, J. A. (1983). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview. Public Personnel Management Journal, 12, 33–42; Kikoski, J. F. (1999). Effective communication in the performance appraisal interview: Face-to-face communication for public managers in the culturally diverse workplace. Public Personnel Management, 28(2), 301–322; McMahon, G. (2007, June). Unlocking potential. Training Journal, 52–55; Gordon, M.E., & Stewart, L. P. (2009). Conversing about performance: Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 473–501.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Technology, Coaching & Performance Management
With the Internet, coaching has become “e-coaching”
Provides distance coaching as well as near-real-time evaluation and assistance
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.