due in 5 hours
8.1
| Myanmar | ||||||||||||
| No. of laborers: 6 | ||||||||||||
| Cost per labor: 3 | ||||||||||||
| Total labor cost : 6 * 3 = $ 18 | ||||||||||||
| Units produced = 40 Units | ||||||||||||
| Labor cost per unit=Labor cost per day/units produced per day = 18/40 | $ | 0.45 | per unit | |||||||||
| Labor cost per unit for Myanmar= $ 0.45 per unit | ||||||||||||
| China | ||||||||||||
| No. of laborers: 10 | ||||||||||||
| Cost per labor: 2 | ||||||||||||
| Total labor cost : 10 * 2 = $ 20 | ||||||||||||
| Units produced = 45 Units | ||||||||||||
| Labor cost pr unit=Labor cost per day/units produced per day = 20/45 | $ | 0.44 | per unit | |||||||||
| Labor cost per unit for China= $ 0.44 per unit | ||||||||||||
| Billings | ||||||||||||
| No. of laborers: 2 | ||||||||||||
| Cost per labor: 60 | ||||||||||||
| Total labor cost : 2 * 60 = $ 120 | ||||||||||||
| Units produced = 100 Units | ||||||||||||
| Labor cost pr unit=Labor cost per day/units produced per day = 120/100 | $ | 1.20 | per unit | |||||||||
| Labor cost for Billings= $ 1.20 per unit | ||||||||||||
| China is chosen because the cost is low. | ||||||||||||
8.3 & 8.4
| Thailand Polishing = 2000 baht = 2000/10 = $ 200 | INDIA | 0.3 | 200 | 60 | 200+60 | 260 | Notes: | ||||||||||
| bid=offer | |||||||||||||||||
| India Shine = 2000 rupees = 2000/8 = $ 250 | INDIA | 250 | buyer chooses least offer | ||||||||||||||
| Sacramento Glow = $ 200 | INDIA | 0.3 | 200 | 60 | 200+60 | 260 | |||||||||||
| If I have to purchase the disks, either I will purchase from Thailand Polishing or Sacramento Glow becasues the bid is the same which the least. | |||||||||||||||||
| Q. 8.4 : | |||||||||||||||||
| India Shine is the most economical firm because the bid is with the least cost | |||||||||||||||||
8.2
| Transportation per unit | Labor cost per unit | Total cost per unit | ||||
| 1 | Myanmar | to | Denver | 1.50 | 0.45 | 1.95 |
| 2 | China | to | Denver | 1.00 | 0.44 | 1.44 |
| 3 | Billings | to | Denver | 0.25 | 1.20 | 1.45 |
| China is the location chosen for production because the cost is the least. | ||||||
8.5
| Weighted Scores | |||||||
| Factor | Weight | Maitland | Baptist Church | Northside Mall | Maitland | Baptist Church | Northside Mall |
| Space | 0.30 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
| Costs | 0.25 | 40 | 80 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 7.5 |
| Traffic Density | 0.20 | 50 | 80 | 60 | 10 | 16 | 12 |
| Neighborhood income | 0.15 | 50 | 70 | 40 | 7.5 | 10.5 | 6 |
| Zoning laws | 0.10 | 80 | 20 | 90 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| Total Score | 53.5 | 69.5 | 58.5 | ||||
| a) Ans: the new restaurant must be opened at Baptist Church because the score is the highest among the three location. | |||||||
| Weighted Scores | |||||||
| Factor | Weight | Maitland | Baptist Church | Northside Mall | Maitland | Baptist Church | Northside Mall |
| Space | 0.20 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 12 | 14 | 16 |
| Costs | 0.25 | 40 | 80 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 7.5 |
| Traffic Density | 0.30 | 50 | 80 | 60 | 15 | 24 | 18 |
| Neighborhood income | 0.15 | 50 | 70 | 40 | 7.5 | 10.5 | 6 |
| Zoning laws | 0.10 | 80 | 20 | 90 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| Total Score | 52.5 | 70.5 | 56.5 | ||||
| b) Ans: Even if the weights are reversed, it does not have any influence on the location decision, still Baptist Chruch is choosen because it has higer score | |||||||
8.6
| a, | Weighted Score | ||||
| Factor | Weight | Mobile | Jackson | Mobile | Jackson |
| Incentives | 0.4 | 80 | 60 | 32 | 24 |
| Play Satisfaction | 0.3 | 20 | 50 | 6 | 15 |
| Sports interest | 0.2 | 40 | 90 | 8 | 18 |
| Size of city | 0.1 | 70 | 30 | 7 | 3 |
| 53 | 60 | ||||
| A. Jackson site is selected because it’s the one with higher score | |||||
| b | Weighted Score | ||||
| Factor | Weight | Mobile | Jackson | Mobile | Jackson |
| Incentives | 0.4 | 80 | 75 | 32 | 30 |
| Play Satisfaction | 0.3 | 20 | 50 | 6 | 15 |
| Sports interest | 0.2 | 40 | 90 | 8 | 18 |
| Size of city | 0.1 | 70 | 30 | 7 | 3 |
| 53 | 66 | ||||
| Still the site Jackson is choosen because its score was higher and there was an addition to that score | |||||
Ex 1
| France | Denmark | France | Denmark | France | Denmark | |||
| Weights | Score | Score | ||||||
| Labor availability and attitude | 0.25 | 70 | 60 | (.25)(70) = 17.5 | (.25)(60) = 15.0 | 17.5 | 15.0 | |
| People-to- | ||||||||
| car ratio | 0.05 | 50 | 60 | (.05)(50) = 2.5 | (.05)(60) = 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | |
| Per capita | ||||||||
| income | 0.1 | 85 | 80 | (.10)(85) = 8.5 | (.10)(80) = 8.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
| Tax structure | 0.39 | 75 | 70 | (.39)(75) = 29.3 | (.39)(70) = 27.3 | 29.3 | 27.3 | |
| Education | ||||||||
| and health | 0.21 | 60 | 70 | (.21)(60) = 12.6 | (.21)(70) = 14.7 | 12.6 | 14.7 | |
| Totals | 1 | Sum | 70.35 | 68.00 | ||||
8.16
| a) | |||||||||||||
| Site | FC per year | VC per unit | Site | FC per year | VC per unit | ||||||||
| 1 | 500 | 11 | 1 | 1700 | 4 | 500 | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | 1000 | 7 | 2 | 1000 | 7 | 1000 | 7 | ||||||
| 3 | 1700 | 4 | 3 | 500 | 11 | 1700 | 11 | ||||||
| Step 1: | TC1=TC2 | 1 | 1700 | 4 | |||||||||
| 500+(11*X1)=1000+(7*X1) | 2 | 500 | 11 | ||||||||||
| 4X1 = 500 | 3 | 1000 | 7 | ||||||||||
| X1= | 125 | Units | |||||||||||
| Step 2: | TC2=TC3 | ||||||||||||
| 1000+(7*X2)=1700+(4*X2) | |||||||||||||
| 3X2 = 700 | |||||||||||||
| X2= | 233.3333333 | Units | |||||||||||
| Conclusion: For quantity between 0 and 125 units site 1 is economical/optimal | |||||||||||||
| for quantity between 125 to 233 units site 2 is economical/optimal | |||||||||||||
| for quantity more that 233 units site 3 is economical/optimal | |||||||||||||
| b. Because quantity 200 lies between 125 and 233 - site 2 is economical to produce 200 units. | |||||||||||||
8.17
| Cost | Dallas | Detroit | Cost | Dallas | Detroit | |||||
| FC | 600000 | 800000 | FC | 960000 | 800000 | |||||
| VC | 28 | 22 | VC | 28 | 22 | |||||
| a) | ||||||||||
| TC(Dallas) = TC (Detroit) | ||||||||||
| 600000+28X = 800000+22x | ||||||||||
| 28x-22x = 800000-600000 | ||||||||||
| 6x = 200000 | ||||||||||
| x = 200000/6 | 33333.33333 | |||||||||
| Conclusion: from 0 to 33333 units Dallas is economical location | ||||||||||
| for >33333 units Detroit is economical location | ||||||||||
| b) | Cost | Dallas | Detroit | |||||||
| FC | 660000 | 800000 | ||||||||
| VC | 28 | 22 | ||||||||
| TC(Dallas) = TC (Detroit) | ||||||||||
| 660000+28X = 800000+22x | ||||||||||
| 28x-22x = 800000-660000 | ||||||||||
| 6x = 1400000 | ||||||||||
| x = 140000/6 | 23333.33333 | |||||||||
| Conclusion: from 0 to 23333 units Dallas is economical location | ||||||||||
| for >23333 units Detroit is economical location | ||||||||||
8.20
| CITY | Map (x,y) | Shipping load (v) | vx | vy | CITY | Map (x,y) | Shipping load (v) | vx | vy | ||||||||
| x | y | x | y | ||||||||||||||
| A | 5 | 10 | 5 | 25 | 50 | A | 5 | 10 | 15 | 75 | 150 | ||||||
| B | 6 | 8 | 10 | 60 | 80 | B | 6 | 8 | 10 | 60 | 80 | ||||||
| C | 4 | 9 | 15 | 60 | 135 | C | 4 | 9 | 15 | 60 | 135 | ||||||
| D | 9 | 5 | 5 | 45 | 25 | D | 9 | 5 | 5 | 45 | 25 | ||||||
| E | 7 | 9 | 15 | 105 | 135 | E | 7 | 9 | 15 | 105 | 135 | ||||||
| F | 3 | 2 | 10 | 30 | 20 | F | 3 | 2 | 10 | 30 | 20 | ||||||
| G | 2 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 30 | G | 2 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 30 | ||||||
| 65 | 335 | 475 | 75 | 385 | 575 | ||||||||||||
| x-coordinate = 335/65 | 5.153846154 | x-coordinate = 385/75 | 5.133333333 | ||||||||||||||
| y-coordinate = 475/65 | 7.307692308 | y-coordinate = 575/75 | 7.666666667 | ||||||||||||||
| (5.2,7.3) | Yes it changes | (5.1,7.7) | |||||||||||||||
8.22
| Shool | Map (x,y) | School capacity (v) | vx | vy | |||
| x | y | ||||||
| NP | 4 | 11 | 500 | 2000 | 5500 | ||
| Jef | 5 | 2 | 300 | 1500 | 600 | ||
| Lin | 8 | 2 | 300 | 2400 | 600 | ||
| Was | 11 | 6 | 200 | 2200 | 1200 | ||
| 1300 | 8100 | 7900 | |||||
| x-coordinate = 8100/1300 | 6.230769231 | ||||||
| y-coordinate = 7900/1300 | 6.076923077 | ||||||
| (6.2,6.1) | |||||||
8.21
| Office | Map (x,y) | No. of times | vx | vy | |||
| x | y | ||||||
| Cov | 9.2 | 3.5 | 3 | 27.6 | 10.5 | ||
| Don | 7.3 | 2.5 | 3 | 21.9 | 7.5 | ||
| Houma | 7.8 | 1.4 | 5 | 39 | 7 | ||
| Mon | 5 | 8.4 | 3 | 15 | 25.2 | ||
| Nat | 2.8 | 6.5 | 3 | 8.4 | 19.5 | ||
| New | 5.5 | 2.4 | 3 | 16.5 | 7.2 | ||
| Ope | 5 | 3.6 | 3 | 15 | 10.8 | ||
| Rus | 3.8 | 8.5 | 3 | 11.4 | 25.5 | ||
| 26 | 154.8 | 113.2 | |||||
| x-coordinate =155/26 | 5.953846154 | ||||||
| y-coordinate = 113.2/26 | 4.353846154 | ||||||
| (6,4.4) | |||||||