172
__ ,1 Recruiting
Outline
Social Media Recruiting al United Pa rcel Service
What Is Recruiting?
How Applicants React ro Recruiting?
Fairness Perccpuons
Spillo1'cr EITeclS
What Makes a Recruiter Effective?
The Recruiccr's Cbaroccerisucs
The DilTerenl Types of Recruicers
Other Foccors Influencing a Rccruicer's EITec tivcness
Training and [)c,vefoping Recruirm
Recruiting Kn owledge
Interpersonal Skills
Prescnuuion Skills
The Orgamzation·s Goals and Recruiti ng Objectives
Legal Issues
MuJtiplc Assessmenis
Applican1 Anraction
Recruiting Metrics
Seiling Recrui1crs · Goals
Giving Recruiters the Incentive 10 Mee t Their Goa ls
Global Recruiting
De\'eloping Applicant Attraction Str ategies
Developing the Organization·, Image a nd Brnnd
De,cloping the Organization·, Employ er Brand
De,,eloping the Recruiung Message
De,·elop Your Skills: How to Develop 01 1 Employer Bro11d?
Developing Real.istic Job Previews
Developing Self-Assessmen1 Tools
Timing the Disclosure of Information
Achieving Recruitment Consistency
Developing a Recruiting Guide
Following the EEOC's Besr Rccruici ng Practices
Social Media Recruiting ar United Par cel Service
Summary
I
p
~•RN.LNG OBJECTIVES L,_,. . h ,tjltr studying this c apltr, you should
be a bit to:
, oescribc the purpose of recruiting.
, 6J<plurn what recruitmen t ··spillover cffccis .. arc.
• Understand what makes a recru iccr m ore or less effective.
, [)eSCribe the various s1ra1cgics used co attracc applicanis.
, l)CScribe how rccruicing guides and 1h c EEOC's be . . .
consis1cncy and qualicy. s1 recru111ng prac11ces promote recruiting
Sodal Media Recruiting at United P arcel Service
Unilcd pa,eel Service (UPS) is one or 1hc world's large, c packa c dcliv .
t,euer connect with and engage po1cn1i al rttruits. and incrc.ue I~ rctu;ry c~~p
an,es. UP~ wan1s .10
Ing erToru.l UPS also wan1s 10 impro\ e i ts emplo)er brand and a1· . on ln\~ 1mcn
1 o( its rccruu.
• d add . . ign ns recruiting Ml"'Jtegv with i1s
technologfcal image. an rcss !heir hig h 1·olume pan cime and I h"
. ·
cffc<:ti,·cly.' . . scasorui inng needs more
cos1
UPS po~ted a series o ( v!dcos on its \~eb si1c profiling 11 day in the life of various
UPS em lo ccs
When lhe VJ~cos beg311 gc ttmg a_lo1 of v,e" s ~d social media sharing ihtu le
d to job applicati~n:. th~
comp311Y decided to gc1 m?rc deliberate about i~ approach lo using social media 10
source and rccrui1.J
UP5 asks for you r ad~1cc o.n how 10 effc ctJ\'ely recru it quality candidates usin
g social media and
other methods. AHcr rcadmg 1h1s chapter. you should ha, e some good idc~ 10 share
with the company.
Toe global consulling fim1 Walson Wya 11 found 1ha1 an excellcnl rccruicing func
cion increased 3
firm's 101al markel value (the dollar va lue of all of ils s1ock) by over 18 percen
t' Unfor1una1ely,
many companies done ha,c a formal rccruiling stracegy. As we have stresse
d. rccruicing ihc
righ 11alcnt is critical 10 a firm 's perform ance. The Concainer Score is consi sccntl
y ranked as one
of 1hc bes t companies 10 work for. On e of the company's core principles is ··o
ne equals 1hrcc: ·
meaning thal one greal person 1s more valuable 1han three good people. The fir
m recruics rnccn-
sivcly 10 help re in force chis principlc. 5
In add ition 10 gelling people in the doo r, recruiting can have an impor1an1 symb
olic aspect
Afcer going through a rigorous rccruic ing and sclcccion process, a new hire c
an feel tha1 he or
she is joining an clile organizacion and is one of 1hc few who "'made 1hc cut."'
This creaccs high
performance expeclations, and sends 1h c message 1ha1 people mnuer.
6
Recrui1men1 can and should be a so urce of suscainablc compe1 i1ive odvan
cagc.7 n,c
Corporacc Executive Board fo und 1ha1 nearly 80 pcrecnl of the variabilicy in qual
uy of hire is due
1orccrui1ers' capabilicics and a11i1udcs a nd the way 1hcy arc managed. incl udrng
workload. devcl-
opmcnl, and performance managcmcn1 prnccices.8
Recrui1mcn1 is ,,ical 10 lhe business mod el of
companies like En1cgirisc Rcni-A-Car , which promolc almos1 cncirely from wi
ch_i~ and regularly
open new locations. Valero Energy e ven calculates holl' good and bad recru
,ung affecls lhc
company's earnings per share. to Nol a1 trac1ing 1he rigln applicanis ri sks organi
zacional fai lure.
This chapcer will cover recruiting and how applicanlS rcacl during lhe rccrui
cing process.
We will also discuss whal makes rccru icers cffeccive and !he diffcrenl strategi
cs companies con
use lo a11rac1 applicanls. Finally, we discuss how 10 make quali ly rccruitmc
n l ac1iv i1ies more
consis1cn1 1hroughou1 a company. Afl cr s1udying chis chaplcr. you should ha
ve a good under-
s1anding of the impor1an1 role recru icc rs and recrui cing ac1ivi1ics play in 1hc s1
afftng process.
WHAT IS RECRUITING?
The recruiting funccion's purpose is co help 1he organizacion employ a 1alcn1cd
group of empl~y-
ecs who contribuce lo Che com pany's business strategy so !he finn can_ac~1
evc a con:ipc1111 vc
advan1age. As you learned in Chapce r I, recruiting refers 10 aH ~rgamLallo
nal pracuccs and
decisions lha1 affec1 eilher che numbe r or cypcs of individuals wil ling ~o app
ly for and acccpl
job offc rs_ 11 This includes convening che leads gcneraccd during soun:rng m
10 ;ob apphcan lS.
Chupter 7 • Recruiting 173
DIS'n16LT/l.£ F.UR.\ r£SS
rM pnnnft!/mrwu o{tN ltmng u r ---
PR OCEDCR..U. F.URSESS
r,rr,pk t brcbefs dlat tN po/1N•J and
prr,,ttd,,:rrr taal rruJ1rd t11 tM l11ru t1t
or l"'1lffl0"""" dttu,.µ, .. r,.. fa1r
I\TE.ll...tCTIO \ AL FAJR.\'ESS
prvplr ·s f"rt'rrptwft.J of rltL
lnU'rptnUNJl trr.illMnll and umol/.l lJ of
Ut/Of"f"!IOJ:U1" rN'Trn-rnrdd=tdtr ~,prorrn
SPI U.O\ ER EFFECTS
the- irul,rrr, o r t.nVIIrndrd
O:#l.1r qMrncrt of w, «non
and ,ts Jobs. and pcrsundmg candid ates to nccc
f .. ·ncr.:au ng m1c~~• in a company .1.. .. n ..•rsonaJ hnk bct"cc n the s1arti ng nee
~ or lPht JOb Ofrcfl
r· nJed 10 th "'m The rccnuti:r i s U"- .,- . • •
c Oro
c, c.: c.: • 1, d Ubl su pport l.hc organizatio n s needs a nd rec
ruiti ng o b c3.n1q.
tmn and the lahor rnar.:ct an n . f
jC'Ctl\
1:--= cffccuH·. A) " c d1~u.ss nc.,t. o ne o f the most im port~t .. o u1comc s o a
ny recrui ting Cff c, lo
hem ttpplicruus rex t to tht: n-cruiung p rocess and to rccn11 1crs.
Ort is
HOW APPLICANTS REACT TO RE CRUITING?
An 1mpon.:1nt goal of recruitment lS to ihc every _applicant 3 po sitive f
eeling abou1
Of~anization. Thus. cffecmc n:cru1t Jng requires cons1dcnng the apphc
ant" s pers pcc h\'c ~
ncc..-.J-'>- Bc\.-nusc the outcome of rrcrui tmcnt-cm p.loy_m_c nt--dcpends o n
t~c resu lts of a scne illd
ck"Ci)ions made by both lhc org:1niiauo n .1rtd_ the 1~div1dua_l, the J>':rspcct1'•cs
of both Pattie~ s or
rclc , anL A single pos nive rccruiunen l cxpc n c nce 1s on.en insuffic ie nt to
impress and au~ a.re
applic:uu~. One s tud) found that ap plicants who experienced mo re rcc
nm ang s1age.,. w h JOb
u, ~ infonmuio n. including a campus career fair, an inte rview. a nd in1cract ing w n h e~t I
Pos1.
dunng a site ,,1511• had more pos1tJ v e reactio ns to thr organ ization.
12 Ncxr. we d ist uis " h p .
0 ~Cts
import.ant for applu:ants to feel hke t hey were treated fa1rly during the re
cruiting p roce s/ 11 5
SO
a.S Lhc consequences lb.ts c.:i.n ha,c. as \I.ell
fa,imess Perceptions
Or£an w iuons expect applicants 10 be since re and honest wh~n seekin
g _p os11ions with lhcrn
Likew1~ . apphcanlS e,i;pcc t emplo)• ers to co ns ider the m o n ~ cir own m
c n ts a nd to make a sin-
cere c ffon to m::uch their s lra lls '-'' Ith JOb opc ~1ngs. Bo~ P~jes ex.peel_
o ne ano ther 10 be prores-
.)JOnal and confonn to commonly ac cepted hmng pracu ccs . In a ddlllo
n to hcing treated foul
applicants e'\pcr l the pn\a.le infomt 3tion they disclose to e mployers to
be protected. ) ,
Th.rec types of pcrcepuo ns of fairne ss a ffect how app licants rcacr to th
e recruitment and
sclccuon process. 1 J Distributive fairness relates to th
e perceived fairnc s:-. of the hiring o r
mou o n OUICo me. If someone gets the job or promotion. he o r s he te nd s 1
0 fi nd this Outcome r If so meone d ocs no t get the job or p
romotion, he or she te nds to fi nd thi s o utcome less fau. ~
,:ist majonty o f applicants will no1 receive the job offer o r promotion.
C o n:-.cquc n1ly, o rganua-
tions will already have o ne fa.1 mcss .. stnkc" against the m at the e nd of a
rccruiung campaign.
Procedurul fairness re lates to peop le's beliefs tha1 the polic ies a nd p
rocedures that pro-
duced the hmng o r promotio n dcc1 s1on we re fair. Organizations h ave
muc h mo re con trol 0\rr
apphcunts' perceptions of procedur al fairne ss than they do of dis tribu
tive foirne,s. Giving Job
applic ants the opportunity 10 showc ase their talcnrs
15 as well as rc spc.c1i ng their privacy 16 will
unprovc ho w f:u r they believe 11,e process 10 be. Different screeni ng de
vices can a lso be per•
ce1vcd as more or less fau. For ex ample, a pplicants tend to believe
in te r vie\\S, rCsum~s. anJ
work-sample tests arc more proccdu raUy fai r than ho nesty tests a nd per
sona l rcfcrr.ils. aJthough
these beliefs appear 10 vary across cou n tncs .
17 Applicants a lso tend to react ncg auvcly "hen
there nrc delays in the recruiuncnl p roccss.18
lnlenctiono.J fairness rel:itcs to pc ople "s percep tions of the int e rpe rs
o na l treatment 3nd
the amo uni of infonnau o n they rec e ived duri ng Lhe hiring process. Hon
e sty and res pect fu l in1cr-
pcrwnal treatment d unng the rcc ru 1tmcn1 process e nha nce applican1s
' pe rceptio ns o f mtcrx-
uonaJ faimcss. 19
A warm and infonnative rccruitc..2° will also te nd to have a pos itive e
ffect on
a_ppl ic.ints ' rcacuo ns. Thus. by vi n u c o f how wel l firms h ire and train t
heir rccruilcr:,, o rgamZJ·
u o ns ha\'e a great dcaJ of contro l ov er how applic an ts perceive in1crac1
ion al fai rnc :t"'-
Spillover Effects
S pillo,·er dTttts arc the indirect or uni ntended conseque nces of a n action
. Ho w applicants 3ft
treated has spi llover effec ts that ext end bc)'o nd lhe recruiti ng activitie
s they cx.pcncncc. Whco
unhappy Job candidates tell po1en11a J c ustomers or job appl icants abou
t a bad recruiting c~pcn·
e ncc lhcy had. 11 can h.ivc s p,llmcr cffcc1.s on 1hc o r
ganization' s pc rfomm ncc a nd i1s ab1l11y 10
rccrun candidal c!'> c ffec 11, cly in the fut ure. Similarly. if .1pplicants were
forced to wait cx1cndcd
~nods for prc..c.c hcdu lcd mtcrv1c\\•s . me t unprepared a nd d istrac1cd in1
crv1c wc rs. foll the ,;;eke·
~o~process was unfair , o r were mad e to feel unimponanr or un welco me
wou ld they ~11II want 10
0 usmcs1. "iLh
the comp.1n) or apply for ano ther job \\ i1h it in the fu;u rc? Probably not N°
11
l
suWCSc the applicanb _ were greeted by name. g ive n a u1 .
[u)I)', interviewed o n lllne by prepar ed and cnLhu\1ast" q ck lour o f the faci
lity, treated respect-
when it said i.r wo uld follow up. Most a pplic.:i.nts trca:~d~~ru 11crs. and heard
from the company
rlJTTI and contm uc to do husmc s\ \Yllh it. is way arc likcl) to reapply with the
Addressin g ho w appl icant~ reac t th roughout th 1
. .
.. agi n g a n)' spillover cffec1s o f the proccs~ M
er, u n ng process is a cm ical compon ent o f
m . L r, . · any arms treat Job d d
feel privileged me mn 1s even cons1d enng them fo . . • can I
n1cs as if they should
. -ere the e nd of their rc lat io n-.h ip with I he m Th r.
3 pos naon a
nd trca1 rcJcctcd candidates as ff
II~ · c impersonal trea1mc I r ·
pUcants by many o rgan11-a t1ons ind icates that th n o
te n give n to rejected
:!eked in the rec ruiting proccs~. 21 • e~ poleni ial spillover c ffc..-cts ar
c ofte n ovcr-
Rec~ itmen t (~nd_thc s pillover effc cb 35.SOCi:ued with ii ) docs
. .
(ion is received. Un u l either the orga nazau o n (or the an<fd not e
nd whe n a Job applica-
considcration. o r Lhe individual is h ired and rcpons ~ : .:i.:e) rcm?~cs the_ person from
fu n her
eslcd in purSuing lhe o pportunity. Ju st because a rcc~~t:or f rcc~;ung k~cps ham ~r her inter•
mean that she or he w ill remain inte rested and sec the hin~ or;:e Y_ app
lied fo r_a Job docs not
shOuld help cand ida tes continually f eel cxcned about the S P ~s to
com~leuon. Recruiters
10 acccpr a reasonable job offer.
oppon unuy and ulumatcly be willi ng
Recr,ui1crs sho ul~ a lways trea~ rt sum ~s and e mploymc ni inquiries wiih res
pect and res nd
to them qu_1c kly. E ~en if n comp.1ny I ~ ~ot cu.rrently luring, m istreating an
applicant cou ld da/: n
his or her ~nte re sl in_ futu re o pponun n 1c~ wnh the organi7.mioo. As obvio
us as this may see1:Ci1
c.:m s~met~mc s be _d ifficult to execute, pan1eularly during periods o f rapid
cx.pansion when ;he
finn 1s '?'mg to t~ire a lot o f people . Respond ing 10 the large number o
f people res ponding 10
job posungs. paru_cul arly t~o~_e posted o n _the lntc~cl, can he dirricuh or imposs
ible. For a fee .
some lntc.met bus1 n~sses w1l l 1~s1an tl)• mail an applicant' s resume 10 o\'e
r 1,000 headhunters and
organi~uons. The Job _of s.~n ing th m ~gh the"'C rtsumCs can be cnonno
us. wor~e yet. a large
proportion o f them don l m ~ct ~he re quirements of the pos 111ons posted . i
ncreasing the scrccna n
burden placed o n the organ1 t.au o n. g
Valero Ene rgy . foc use s heavily on creating a posi tive Job candidate
experience, e\'cn
when people apply \:1th the compan y v1 a the Internet. The ti ml sends at
least three ()Cf')onali , ed
e- mails to each candidate throughou t the applicat.ion process. Whe n a can
didate i.s rcJcc ted. he o r
she rece ives a pos tcard in the mail a ft e r the Job is closcd.
22 Valero knows th at many people not
hired for current o pening s h ave the potent ml to become great employee
s m the fu1ure . Sending
them follo w-up message:-. and e nco uraging appl icants, who might be a
sood fit wtth po"'itio n~
other than the o nes to wh ich they applied, to apply fo r olhcr po1.11io n
s can mcrca:,,c staffi ng
effectivene ss.
Although recru iters a rc often very busy, unresponsive rccruateN arc oft
e n seen as incom-
petent rathe r tha n overworked , n~k ing a neg.:i.ti,e spillover effect for th
e company . \ Vae hO\ia
Bank believes that e -mailing candid ate~ quickly when they ha\'c been re
Jec tcd, and g iving them
the reason s fo r the rcjectaon, has impr o\'cd applica nb ' experiences with W
achov1a's hiring pro-
cess and their ixrccptions o f \ Vac ho via's recruiters.~
Effecti vely usi ng tec hnology can i mprove applic ant reactions and pro m
ote posuive spill -
over effects. For cxum p lc, letti ng a p plic ant~ u"'c mobile apps from com p
anies mcluding Hire Vue
and Wow£er to reco rJ their respon ses to prerecorded interview questio
n~ can appeal to sman -
phone-savvy college ~tudcnts and b usy scmi -p~ sive and passive job ca
nd1da1es. Hiring manag-
ers and recrui te rs a lso like 1hc nbil ity to view the mtcn·1ews "hen it t
i1s their schedu le . Using
social media o r tcxr me:-."'aging 10 s prc.td the word about job openings
to people who opt in can
quickJy and efficiently inform 1arge tcd recruits of career opportunities.
Ncxr. we turn our anc n-
tion to what makes rcc..·rui tcrs effec1 ive.
WHAT MAKES A RECRUITER EF FECTIVE?
The recru ite r is u:tuall y the fir:-.t pcr:to n wi th who m potential applicants ha
,i.: c.ontacl. l llus ._hc or
she is o ne of the most important pla) cf') 1n the hiring process. One stu
dy of busmcss and engmccr-
ing graduates looking fo r job s show ed that in o ver o nc-thmJ of 1hc case
!, the prml~I)' rcas.o n a
graduate c hose a partic ular co mpan y was because of the finn 's rcrruitc
r.-.i A potcnuo.l applicant
who is "turned off• b y a recruiter m ight dec ide no t 10 a pply at all . Ahh ou
gh_c u~cntly unemployed
people m ight pcrsi~t d es p ite a neg ative encounter wn h a recruiter. JX
b~1vc JOb seekers, man)
Ch:1p1cr 7 • Recnullng 175
r 176 °'3:p(c:r 7 • RC\:r'Wun_s "1 H be h.•s" likely to do :,o. I n fac1, \\ hen it come:, 1 of" horn an: C.\tremcly ra.lenh; • '' ~uc-s c.,pcncnccd by lesscr•skilk"<J 1"1.."C'nurcrs can ° ~¾1\c Jot, ~krs. lhc nu'5CJ hinng opportum cost fll'lns I~ m'-1:,1 r;:"c;' Ii • ha,·c hnw
cd mformauon nboul organ1z auons and j ob:,. In the ab
op c O
h:n I ft ly on the UUJts of 1hC' recrutlcr an
d the rccnmcr'.) heh SCncc O f
mfomuoon. the) " 11
• 0
en n:r•nce any recruiung del ays tha t occur dunng the
p , a..,,Ors<\\
lienals The rccnmcr s compc c • .
,~ '0<:css
50"'- on--~JJ s, naJ applu::1nts about an 01"Ean
1La lJOn s c harac1cns1u.::,, - T he I.) pe of rec , and
de lo ·cd .also Ssc-cms w ma.L.c a d1/Tcn:ncc. For c~am~lc, a f
im1 can Mgnal thar ll is dcn10 ' l'U1tc,
cal~\ ~ncN by deploying a n:cruucr from a mmonty
gr oup. Some compan ,~s c ho0sc gf1M,.
h • ..... 1 10 mct'I "'ith upplrcants, ,, h1ch can
ulso send a signal, JI an acru I Pt<>p,,
ot er uwn ~ ·ruCE1 c~O f ,1.,. co mn.<1ny ,s doing the rccnu11ng
, this w ill sen<l ;1 ~,gnal 11. -a h1rin,
=•ser or u,e o "" ,-· . fl' CE
O B ' I G ""' the Ob
,~ important 10 the company. For c.'(,:unplc . .b M,croso s
. • • I a res spcm half his I J
- ___ , uJ , -rson aJly cal l college se niors to rc
crun them lo work m Mier !lllt
on rccru1 ung "'"" " o u r . osofi ~6
Rc:sc.ltt'hcrs ha, c concluded th :u the cx1en1 to wh,ch recn
m_ers infl uenced job ~cir
depended on th~ dcgrtt 10 \\htch n.""Cruitcrs were seen a
s rcl,abl~ s ignals of what II WouJd n
hke- 10 " ork for the company . 1oc s1gnaltng function o! a
recru iter was c~nc ludcd 10 be
I ht
,mponanr " hen Job candidate s had cons rdcrablc 1nfonn.auo
n a~ul the organuar,0 0 and /or if:;
recruiter " !IS from human rcso utC'Cs 311d 001 from the apphc
an r s func110naJ area. Tlus rcinfo rc-ti
lb<: idea thoi recruJ1er11 should be sclcc1cd and rrJincd 10 be_ k
nowledgeable abou1 rhe Job o pcnini
be etrc,·uvc m comm unicatin g lhis informa11on, be pcrcc,v
cd by applrcan1s as lru.stwor thy, and
pos1uu:h rcflccl "hat ii is like 10 work for lhe company .
An~thcr ,mponnn, re.1Son 10 f ocus on rccruircrs is that thes
e people arc ~cuing the SlanlU Jd
for t.llent for the company. lnc caliber of ta.Jeni 1hcy pursue a
n d pass _o n ~or further considcl '3llon
\UJI dcrenmne the success po1ent ial of1hc compa~y: For many
orgam zauo ns, fronrfinc rccn uicrs
m.11'.e the ,as, m.:1jonry of:ippl ic.an1-scrccmng dcc1s1ons.
Th., R.,auito,r's Ch•r•cto,ri stics
Individuals may m:ikc inferenc es abou11hc aurocliv~ncss o f a
job ~r the probability of n.-- ccJ\',ng
a job offer based on rrcrujrcr charac rcns ucs. These rnferc
nces can influence the decis ion 10
pur.
~ue the job. Research suggests that rccru11crs with the charac
1cris1ics summ;:tn Lcd in Tab Jc 7.
1
arc likely 10 be more s uccessfu l. Regardless of whether the rcc
nHlcr is internal or cx1crnaJ 10 lhr
org:miution. this c:orc sci of c ompcrcncics seems 10 be 1,:npo
nanr. \Vhc~ the rcnuilcr is fro m the
t1pplic:uu·s funcuon.11 area. the se effects arc C\'Cn more lrkc
ly 10 occur.~
Although there is lmle eviden ce that recruiters· personal c
harac1cris u cs (e.g., race or S C.\)
arc imporun1, recruiter behavior s 1oward applicants and their
perceived kno" ledge of bor h lh<
JOb and the ;ipplicanr do inf luence applicant altitudes and
fx!haviors.28 Rccruil f; often pcrcchc
1"1: iypical n:cnurer's prep;ir. ition as in:idcquare wirh respect 10
knowledge ahou1 both char.rc rrr-
istics of applicants and charac 1eristics of die posi1ion bein
g lilied. 29 Rccrurrc rs musr be famii,ar
"ilh lhe job, knowledgeable abou1 lhc Job and organizatio
n , and be morivarcd ro do a good job
n:crurring qualified apphcan ts. To accomplish these o bj
ecti ves, the organi,arion can choose•
rccru11cr u•ho has pre\ iously w orked or curren lly works in
1he 1argc1 p osition. or II ca n tram a
recruirer on the infonnation ne eded abou1 the job and organiz
oiion.
Although n:sean:h has fou n d 1hc largest impact of rec
ruiter behavior,, lo be on Ol "<rall
.1pplicam imprc)Sions of the recruiter rather than on appli
can1 in1cn1ions lo purl UC or acC'Cpl
•tliiii• Oesirab/e Recruiter Characteristlcs30 • Fam,/1anty with the Job and
organ1zat1on
• Good 1, sren,ng sk,11s
• Good communrcat,on skil ls
Good sooal sk,11s
lntell,gence
• Self.conf1dence
• Extroversion
• Enthus,asm about the JOb and company
Tt1Jstworth1ness
• Cred,b,l,iy
...Ji offers, 1hc rcscnrch ha ;; ov crwhclnungly hccn done with
r I: rs The cosrs of lc,scr-~J...,llc:d rccruifeN in t u
ndcrgrndua1c~ " ·ho arc ncuve Job
set- ~ Ukely larger amo ng more passive Job ~ cr ~s or llll\sed opponunillcs to m
o.kc 3
good
bitC •,mpor1an1 in their ultuna rcly bccom,no an cl c ·crs who
~c innml rccruucr c~pcncnccs arc
mo,e · . c ,.p 1can1s at all A .
'[h his or her current pos111on wilh another cmpluye I
k · P0len11al recruu who •~ happy
W1 ·cncc with o recruiter tha n a po1cn1inl rccruu \\-~~sh~ s c~r lo be mo_rc pu1 off by a negative
e:c~zation is \\here she or h e wou ld like 10 work G' - h
rcady decided that the rccruu er',
or1:rcc1ly mnnipulaled rccru1 1cr bi,.'ha\ ,ors II is als~ ivcnbrl
at rccrunc:r research has genera lly
~ • onrac1ing college undergraduare, w~uld '-- poss, c th ai the cffcc1s of rccru
i1cr bcha,,.
,ors m 11 uc stronger m
lhe prcsc f . . .
ind t,cner rccrui1crs in general. Or gam,auons need 10 11
h . nee o rccruncr tr:unmg
leverage 1hcir rccrui11ng func tion 10 prod
co eel I cir own data and und erstand
::t~'ani,.arion·s goals. uce new hires who arc the best p
ossible firs w1th
SfGNAUNG Bc~ausC' ~ople ofl~n have limned informa1to
n about organization~ and jobs m
the absence of_obJCChVC infor m:mon t
hey may rely on trnus of the recr uiter and the recrui t;r's
t,eh&viors 3S .s,gnal~ of aspcc _is of bot
h lhc company and the J0b opp onunuy. Job condida1cs
oOcn in1erprcr_ rccruttcr bch;n • or °:' a ~,gnal of their chances o
f getung a Job offer. l:? Applican ts
in1erprel rccruu mcnl cx~nen~ e-~. mc!udrng JX'rtc1vcd rccruuc
:r compc1ence, rccru11men1 dcl a)''·
&11~ ~ §jnder ~omposiuon OI lnlcrvic~, ~ ncls: 3 ~ symbolic of br~cr o
rgan1zat1onal charac.
,ensues. Applrcan~s m_ay fo m1 ncg;iin-c 11nprcss1ons of lh
e orgamzauon and 1urn down job
offer$ if a poor rcc rullcr 1s con sidered reprcscnrarhe of 1hc o
rganizauon as a whole.
As we disc~sscd. ~he c hoice of the person sc n1 to recruit ca
n be taken ns a ~ign al of the
importance of rhc Job. wuh h1 gher-lc:,·cl rccruucrs. 1hc actua
l hiring manogcr. and the CEO being
considered rcncctivc of m ore 1mpon301 jobs than s1aff recr
uiters. The rccnmer may also be a
signa.1 of dem~grophic diverst l} 1n 1~ ?rgan1,a11on i f the n'<
'nuter 1s o demographic m,non ty.
Because recruiter behaviors affe ct apphcanr allrac1ion mdircc
rly through innuencing applic ant
perceptions of job and orgnni ,.:uional a11ribu1cs.l-i ii seems
likely 1ha1 recruits infer chJr.J ctcris-
ucs about 1he orgoniza1 ion fro m 1hcircxpcricnces wi1h the o
rg.1niLauon' s rccru11c~. The fa c11ha1
rccruils arc more pul o ff by p oor recruiter behavior" hen th
e recruiter is a hiring manager rather
than a human resource reprcscn1 1ujvc s uggcs1s that n'Cruits m
ay make stronger ge ncruli zau ons
about lhc job and orgnnizatio n from cxpcncnccs wilh f)COpl
c m the organization who arc c lo,ely
ltnkcd to 1ha1 job, such as the hiring manager. Th is funher
cmph~1,es rhe poin1 1h:11 . as r ecruit•
m, hiring managers can ha, c :l large impact on lhc ~ucccss
of a ~1affing effort.
AIIECRUITER'S DEMOGRAP HICS AND AmTUDES Doc
, thcsimilanry bc1wccn lh< dem ographic
characteristics o f 1he rccrurter -includmg his or her age, gen
der. r.u.·c. rank, and function- and lhc
demographic c har.te1eris1ics o f the applic:int he or \he 1s n.
'Crui1ing affccl ;1 job's t1t~ac1i v~nc_,,?
Consumer marketing research sugge~IS lha1 rcspon~s 10 in0
ucncc '°urcc, (e.g .• rcc runcrs) smular
1o the recruit mny be more favor able than responses 10 dissimil
ar sourccs.35 But do " omen rc~ pond
more favorably 10 female recr ui1ers and men more pos111,c
ly 10 male n"Crui_1cn.? The data seem to
in<licare this is not the cnsc. A lthough ,rudics h:lH.' tended to
look at o nly a , ,ngle. or at mo sl :1 few.
demographic charnc1cn slics, they ind1ca1c 1hat ~in11lari1y 10
~e ~~~ter d()C.) nor nccc,s..1 n ly lc:1d
to more fa,,orablc applicant an itudc) IO\\nrd the Job or ? r!!am
zauon. . ~ .
However u recruiter's beh a vior 1oward npphcants and
:ipphcanb pcn.:epuon of t he
recruiter's kno~ledgc can ha ve 3 big impact on how 01trac
1i,c a job is._ 37 Unfonu~a1cly. at lcas1
one srudy found rhal recruite rs were more likely 10 leave a
pplicants wnh a n~ga1n·e rath er 1h?n
1 sitivt im rcssion of a n org:rni,a tion.38
Apparently. applicanls seem 1 0 bchcvc n~~ny rccrull•
e:' arc ill p.:,,ared.39 Rccruilcr< can do a beucr job 1f 1hey arc
fa m1l ian,11h rhc posiuon and_ n~
knowledgeable abour rhc org ani,a1ion. To help 1hcm bcuc
r undersiand ,hc>e fac~IS of rct"'"~~ the organization c:in choose a
recruiter who has pre" musly "orkcd ~r cu~nt ! _wor ·s m
. . . art this kno,dcdgc to the rccr
uncr v1:1 training.
large, posrrron, or lhc compa ny can rmp . , c hkel lh
al the key 10 successful recruiung
Ins1cad of a recruiter's dcmo grnphtcs,
11 s mor y d 11011 ·,·ar,·o,,s Recru ilmg requin:s
. . . . . I 't's ,•alue S)S
tem an 1 •
1s the recruiter s ab,l,ty to re a te to a recrw b"I' 11
rhc organi;,ation and i1s opp onu-
. f I ·, and rhc a r rry ro sc
~~uas1on on the _p~n o t 1 e rccru i er d on superfic
ial demographic ch;irnc1cris1 ics \\hen
nu1es to 1he recru it. 0
Research has focusc. . 1 10 • nd cmp:ithilc with rccrui~
:md to
. · • brlrry 10 re ale "
wha1 may be important 1s th e recruiter ~
8 . . d pealing 10
what is im ponnn1 to them .
comm unicarc effec tively wi 1h 1lrem by rdcnrrfyrng an o
p
Chap1cr 7 • RC'C'n11t1ns 17 7
178 Cru1p1cr 7 • R<enJ11tn~ for thlS proposition. one _study fo u~d that manage ment 8rad
J>roqJtng prc hminat) suppcrt itcrs " '1th :itutudcs s1m1lar lo their own:•1 A ua,C\
s.•don£ jobs fJ' " higher niun~~: 0 ,~ubjcct. organi zati ons should evaluate for the
1 ~gh
bmitcJ =:m:h tus b,:cn done t , 411d U5C this infonnation to hire the be,1 rec rnschc ,
REl'!EltU /'IIOFILE
the t thi· s,cms to bc a ac10 . d 'f~ rune,. I " ~ ~r or~- -> - a mean sending di fferent rc~rutters to I. ercnt _recrui ting
even I)"
d,0cr<nt pos1t1on>. 11us m Y bl'sh r11ppon ,11th apphcants. Some organozmions c v ll to
. . th<ar , h1l11y to csta , a h' h h en try lo
m:L\.t Dl.tE ' th mt UDJ\'crsitics from w 1c I cy arc recru iti ng a nd
m:uch rrcrui1crs· a.Ima mau:rs "' 1
5 of npplicants The better connection a rccrui~cr c l'Ccn.iu.
. • ho •to" ns ,.;th the homcto"'n ·. . . . b f' be' an tnal
ers me r<atcr the chances of an organ11.auon SJO o ,crs ing accepted . '
",th applicants. the g I th . b of r,cruaung nurses for pharmacc utkal sales repre ..
Toke for cx amp c. e JO d h JI -n1a 111,
.. ns Recruiters who personally relate to the rewards an c a cngcs of nursing a nd •
pos,uo · compelling way the feat ures of the J0b arc more h kcly 10 ap ho
can rommunica1e m .1 more -- f h _ . pcaf to
nurses than those recru iters who have liule undcrstandang o l e nurstng profession . PtofiJon
. . d _ , pphc:uus' motivations and value systems can also be use d 10 d g
mformauon about cs1n.,., a · · . . C\"15t
tr:iining material fo r recruiters. If the match bct"cen the recruiter and the recru 11 ·s va lue S) stem,
can be ideou ficd. the recruiters can be trained 10 bcuer relate to appl,eants and present the job on
the mebl attr.lCth ·c wny.
DEVELOl'ING REOIUITER PROFILES Whether a recruit~, is internal or cxt~rnal to the orgai,,.
,auon. understandi ng the recruiter ch:uacrcrisucs ?'ost hkely 10 aura.ct desired app hcants can
enlwlce n.-cru iting effecti veness. One way 10 do tht s ts to create a reviewer profile of the ind,.
a prr,/il,, r,f 1W s.blh. c-~ru:r.aa. and bacqf'UIJNU of dtt IIWJfl ti/ttDtY
rrc1'VJll'l"J Jor dffnYtU pruuo,u
ndual recruiters " ho 113,c ~ n the most effective in the past. Over time. organi,atio ns can track
apphtllllt reactions 10 differe nt recruiting styles :"'d messa_ges. and pr? file the s kills. charactcns-
tics. and backgrounds of its most effecti ve recru11ers fo r d1ffercn1 p?st11o ns.
Fa-example. • firm might find after conducti ng such an analysis that external rccruite11 do,
better job when hiring speed is a priority and the le ve l of the position being fi lled is rel auvcly high.
Jnrcmal recruiters nught be a better choice when it's more imponant to keep hiri ng co,ts down . Whoa
recruiting new gradurues with different degrees. recru11crs with diffe rent backgrounds might be mm
clfecovc. Analyzing thi s type of information can help an organizauon belier spc'<·if) " ho should do
the = ling and 11,hat the job sp,c1 fications should be for recruiters targeting different posit ions.
MATOIING THE RECRUITER TD THE TARGETED APPLICANT In some cases, a firn , might first
identify someone whom they " ould very much like to hire, then slrategizc how to bcs1 attract
them 10 join the organizati on. Often the targeted ind ividual is c urrently employed a nd not look-
ing 10 swuch jobs. In this situation. it is critical that the choice of recruiter be made a fter consid-
eri ng whom the targeted individual is likely to best be persuaded by. A cold ca ll by a r ccnillor
from the human resource dcpanmcnl is not as likely 10 s1imula1e the in1erc<1 of 1 he indil•idual
as "ell as a professional colleague in the hiring organization. or even the CEO. Per suasion is ..
1mponan1 recruiter skill. and rn order to persuade an individual 10 conside r leaving a Job she or
he ,s happy with. the message must come from a trusted and respected ind ividual 10 maximi,c
the chances 1ha1 II be given full considcmtion.
\Vhen the dean of Rutgers· s Division of Life Sciences wanted to hire someone who could
m:ikc Rutgers Unl\ers11y preemine nt in genetics research. he staned by contacting 1 he top people
rn the field of genetics. These contacts repea tedly recommended the same person. ·n,c dean then •g~ssi>el) rccrurted the person by lapping a Rurgcrs agricullural geneticist who
had worked
"Hit him decades earlier 10 help convince him lha1 he should jo in Rutgers. Titc de an c, cn " '"1
so for as to contact the man·s best friend from childhood and persuaded him 10 put in a good
" Ord for Rutgers. Uluma1cly, despite no1 1ni1ially having any in1ercs1 in return in g 10 the East
Coast. "here he grew up. the scientist was persuaded Jo accepl 1he posiiio n. 42 Just as a rccruiu ng
message should be lJalored 10 bes1 inform and address the needs and conce rn s of eac h applican~
th' recruiter should be chosen based on his or her ability 10 commu nicate wi1h and pe rsuade each
recruit to consrdcr the org1111i,a1 ion as their employer o f choice.
The Different Types of Recruiters
So far. "' ha-, looked most J J • • h man
c osc Y at internal recrui te rs e mployed within their firm s 0
:~urcc dcpan ments. Ho" c,·cr. lherc arc other types of recruiJcrs Ncxl we look at some of the
eren1 l)pcs and lhc advanlJgcs and disadvantages of each. . •
(RIJITERS FROM OUTSIDE OF THE STAFFING FUNOI0N As "' .
(If . do nol have to originate from a firm 's h c have explained . in ternal
,teru11ers . • . . . . . uman resource dcpan.mcnt. Research has round
1h41 an infonna11on s?urcc s crcd1b1h_1y is mnucnced by the source's expertise and trustwor~
thl0CSS·4.l n,c_re forc. II may be c ffcc11v~ to fi nd technically trained employees who arc inter •
ested in recnuung a~d make them rccruucrs-ror cxnmplc, use e ng ineers to recruit engineers,
accountants to rccnut occount.::rntS, an_d so forth. This should maximize Lhc recruiter's cre dibility
t,ocaus< the pe':'on cumntly works '" lhe poshi~n being lilied. It i, also often easier to t rain
1«:hnically qualtfoed peop_lc how to _rccrurt than 11 ,s to teach r<cruiters technical know ledge. By
usi ng employees_ as recruiters. apphcants can also belier assess their fi t and comfon l eve l with
itoeiob opponunoty. . . Some of the top U.S. corporations assign their primary recruiting responsibili ties 10
their
IIIIC managers rather_ than human '.csourcc professionals. For example. the managi ng d irector of
the invcstment-banktng ~ rm CS First Boston spends half histimc on recruiting. Senior managers
11 the phannnce uuc~I g iant Merck devote conso~erable time 10 recruiting."" In addition, as we
hSi\'C indicated,_ the mvol_vcmcnt of an organ11a11on's top leaders in its recruiting an d sclec1ion
p10grums can signal apphca nts that the company considers n:cruiting the right people t o be a pn•
ority and takes rts ~•len_l senously. This wa ll ?bv1ously increase the organization's attra c tive ness.
Although using hnc managers as rccnu tcrs can work fo r many companies. ii can be im prac-
tical 10 take employees out of their regular jobs 10 serve as r ecruiters. Effective recruiting also
r,quires more than technical job know ledge. Oftentimes recruiters can be trained suff iciently to
, .,plain a job to applicants and ans" er the ir questions. Compared to line. or haring, managers.
recruiters arc also in a better posi tion to answer broader qucstmns about the orga nizatton · s
policies and benefits and identi fy other positions in the organization for which recr uits might
be a good fit. By contrast. there may be some highly specialized positions, such as cngi nccr-
iig or medical research. that require a recruiter 10 be well versed in appropriate jarg on to fully
communicate the job requ irements to pote ntial applicants as well as scree n candida tes. In this
case, it is the rec ruiter's role to help minimize the lime the manager has to spend off the job
r,cruiting.
EXTERNAL RECRUITERS Hiring external recruiters is ge nerally more expe nsive. H owever, if
1111 external recruiter can fill a position faster and with a belier hire than internal n.-cru
ucrs, the
iacreased cosl might be well wo nh it. External recruiters ortcn hav_c more c~t~nsi" c nct\~ork~
of potential cand idates to tap for job openings. Many of these rccruuc rs spec,ahzc in pano~ul ar
types of candidates o r industri es, which can gi ,·c forms greater access to larger. m ore highly
q,aiified applicant pools. Howeve r, external recruiters g_enerally Jack the depth of know ledge
about an organization 1ha1 internal recruiters possess. Obv,ou,ly, thrs docs not mean t hat c'1cmal
recruiters are unable to identify good potential applicants . h dots mean thal the !i nn needs 10
spend more time communicating recruiting-relevant information to them. .
Providing external recruiters \\ ith conti nuous feedback about the qual11y of their pr evious
hires is an imponant step toward improving the staffong process. Generally, the Jongcr-1cm1 th e
relationship betwee n an organization and an external recru iter is. the 1ic:11er t_hc recru iter wtU be
able 10 identify and a11rac1 hi gh-potential talent for the company-:-espe~1ally of he or sh~ rece ives
feedbac k from the firm. Unfortunately, many organizations provide their external rec ruiters wi th
little feedback. · • .
1 · · f an run as high as 40 percent of a new hire s fi rst year
Bcca.usc cx tcrn_a r:ccnutmg ccs c . . 1 ru1tcrs to 'oin their internal rccnm•
compensauo n, organ11a11ons ha\'C begun hrnng cxterna ~ ff J f 500 who use Linkcd ln ing siaff In jus t six years GE has built an inlcmal rccrumng
513 0 . . · 1 . 1
and B~chOut to fill mo,; of its openings. including about 10 percent of ,1s semorhpro _c ssa:\
. also able lo complete most scare cs '" a u and executive posit ions. These recru iters were 1
·, rs need GE still relics on 73 d , h 170 days mosl ex terna rcc ru, c ·
ays, compared wuh I e average . h specialized jobs. b ut it has
outside recruiters whe n req uired fo r confident,al sc~ esborbvcry·n• this recru it ing tale nt in-
00 ·i1· car 1n search ,ccs Y n ng, ~
saved approximately S I nu ton a Y d h .1. J'kc 10 w ork at GE they have also
ho B h . belier undcrstan " all ts r • use. ccausc l e recruuers now . , 5 5
. .1 1 't is Coca-Colas internal recru iters
been able 10 find hires who belier fi t tts culture. '"~' ar y .. 1
't'ng Coca-Cola executi ves hired f • 1 b I cxccuuvc rccru1 1 •
who do approx imately 95 pcrccnt? 115 g 0 a 'rd f· 1
and arc half as likely 10 leave as those
by its inside tea m arc hired approximate ly one•l ht . as er h h ,6
hired by externa l recruiters. and candidate di versity ts twice as rg .
Chapter 7 • Rccnutrng 179
180 au,..,, 7 • R,cruiun& other Factors Influencing • Recruiter's Eff
ectiveness
~.bn f:tctors can influence a f\.-Cru11er's ctTccu, ·cncss and performance. Some of th
roo. ~ rontrollobk by the rccnurcr. and orhcrs arc nor. There ore son _,c ,iruarions •~Sc rac.
. . , h h ,-en rhc mosr ralcnrcd n.'<·ru11er w,11 ha, ·e d1fficu/ry 1dcnr,fyino loin,
po:,.,0005 ,or ~ ,c . c aniJ .ii
ing qualified applksnrs. For example. • poor c~ploy cr repula!Jon due lo lack of fu nd,n lrac,.
>UbsWJti.tl job sm,.ss h.l,·e ere.red serious recru,un_g challenges fo~ l~c U.S. FOO<J •nd g iJld
Adminl.Slnllioo. In odd,uon. rhc time-consuming hmn g process thar ,sn I recruircrs· ~ Dn,g
couscs" 10 nuss our on good eoodidores " ho :i.ren'r w illing 10 "air Lha1 long ro learn ; u1r ofr,,
rhc Job." Figure 7. / ,llusrr.ues some of 1he pnmary fa ctors rhar have an impacr on I.he
I they g"
ocss of recrujrcrs. Ne:<1. "e discuss each. cffcc1f\r.
THE UUIOII MAIIJCET Swpluses and shonagesof1'1le nl can ha ve a large impac1 on how ClTcc
m.cnurers are. Their skdls ore hkcly ro be rested when I.he labor marke t 1s 1ighi and . b ~,-,
l . I . b . . l · Jo S<ck,
h.:ive the IW<wy of choosmg from among mu Up e JO oppon unrucs. n lhrs suuation "
" ill need ro "sell" Lhc job and orgonization ro poten tial applicants. Of course wh ' r~"'"
. . . . , en Job,
=. orgaruzaoons generally h.l, c an easier ume ot1racung qualuy raleni. If a compan . Ott
only ,mplo)<r m ro"·n. rccruircrs will also have a m uch easier lime artracri ng applica >
15 th,
JD a loose labor market in which applicanrs ore plenti ful, rccruircrs somerimcs find ii d nfliis. e.,.
- ~- - k . h . . ' ieu/f ro
oruacr the rigb1 land ofraJenL AJrbough rbe I:""." mar ·c1 s c arac1cnsrrcs can affccr rhc Challen
of their assignmcnrs. rccru11crs sull have a big 1mpacr on I.he success of most recruiting clTons.g,
THE ORGANIZATION 'S OfARACTERl~TlCS In add ition ro I.he stare of the labor markc~ 1h,
nature o_f lhe organization in rerms of ,rs srze ~•d v1S Jb1l11y can also mnuence I.he cffecrivcnt5.1
of rccruucrs. Smaller. lesstr-known orgamzauons o ften have a harder rime recruiting. in
b<cJWSC poientiaJ app/Jcanrs h.:ive nor heard much abo ur lhc company and either never hear.:
job opponunioes or choose 10 apply elsewhere. Whe rbcr the linn is seen as a desirable plac
woo: will also influence iis ability 10 ar1rae1 po1cn1iaJ applicanrs. F or example. recruiters f: 10
organization Iha! lwjus1 been responsible for a large environmcnla/ disaster arc likely 10 have'"
hard~r time at~ting applicanis rban recruiters for a socially responsible company rhai cnga~
m philanrhrop,c acun ues. A recru11cr can do a greaJ d eal 10 educate rargered applicanrs abour 1hr
nature of rbe work and organi,.ation and pul I.he ftr111 o n an applicant 's "radar screen," so ro spc,t.
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE JOI The nature o f rbe job being filled can also influence a
recruiter's success. Some jobs arc less desirable bec ause of rbc work I.hey invohc, rbeir loca-
tion. hours, and so forrb. For example, recruiting f or nigh! shifts and rcpc tiri vc work can be
more d,fficu/1 rban recruiting for day shifts and for j obs requiring a variery of s kills and ae111,1.
tics. Attracting applicanrs for a posirion rba1 pays le ss than comparable positrons in 1he same
Tht Labo, Mariel
Co" orlcrs
The Orgamzuuon ·s Char.u:tcnsucs
llmng Managers
FIGURE 7•1 F actors lnfluencmg a Recruiter's Effectiveness
TI1e Chnrac1erist1cs o ftl,e Job
-
gcograPhic arc• will also be harder. Improving Job char actrrisr .
and rctcntJO~ cffo~s. Trucking comp3ny U.S. Xprcss rdcmific d ics can of1~n enhance recruiting
d(i,·erdissausf~cuon. To bell~~ at~ract and retain i 1s dn"crs, U poor d1rcc11ons as n .lop cu~sc of
perform by adding global pos111oni ng devices 10 all f .S. Xpress made rhe Job ea<ier 10
haffC'CS 1hal its recruiters wi ll be successful by • 0
'.b trucks. Clearly, a 11rm can improve the
~Ing 10 rm.•s . improving rJ-c eharac1ensrics of ,he jobs ihey arc
Hl"IIIG MANAGERS Once a new employee S1'1r1S , k h
itself. and orgonizati onal policies and pmciiccs usu all"::s~
15 or her bo~s. c? workcrs, the ~ork
,cc::rui1cr on outcomes such as job performance R y me much grca1cr 1111ponancc 1h:1n 1he
Ir .1. .. hiring managers w11h \\.'horn they work ·d ccruuc
rs can only do so much 10 a1trac1 t3lcnt .
. u"" o not rcmfon:c the orga ·. · · d · b' I
the cffortS of even the most 1alcn1cd recruiter may be was1ed For exam ;1zauon s . ~sm1 , II~,
rnight t,c very enthusiastic about a potential oppor1 . r. • • P ~- a prom,smg recruit
, . . unny aitcr mcctmg with a recruiter but be
nrmcd off by an unpro1essional hmng manager In facr /'
recruiting beha vior exhibi rcd by h' · · ' a pp reams Scem to be more put off by
paor . . mng managers than by rccrui1crs. Hiring managers must
scercc~1.ters as partners and reinforce rather than un< lcnninc rhcir efforts.
.H1~ng . rnana~crs al s?. need 10 unders1an d the compcicncics, srylcs. and traits the
orgamz.auo~ 15 scekms. if hmng managers are scre ening for chamc1crisucs d1ffercn1 1han 1hosc
Jr<ing rccrulled for, a large numbe~ of q_ua/ified cand1d a1cs nrc likely robe rejecred fo r 1hc wrong
':asons. On~ large U.S. company 1dcn11ficd a group o fhinng manogers lhar had Lhc highcsr can-
didJIIC rcJccuon rares. Ir rurned o u1 rhc monagers had been rcjeering qualified cand,daics due 10
reasons unrelated 10 lhc firm 's se lection cri~eria i ncluding iooppropriatc dress, lamucd eye con•
r,cL and poor poSlurc. The company dercrmmed 1har rhc fi nancial cosr of 1his mi srake amoun1cd
ro over $ 100,000 in applicant processing and candid are asscssmenr. not indudmg 1he cos, of
losing people who would have been good hires.
In addition lo qualified cand1dares nor being recruite d and hired, if rccru,1ers fail ro make
hiring managers aware of lhe basic _legal rcquireme nrs they need ro foll ow during a staffing
effort. rhe ftm1 can be hu wuh lawsu11s. In one of irs judgmrnis. the U.S. Coun of Appeal< for
the Seventh Circuit concluded tha1 leaving manager s with hiring authonty in ignorance of 1hc
basic fea tures of discrim ination laws 1s an "cxtr.to rdinary mistake" for a company 10 makc."'
9 Of
course, recruiters usually receive legal trJining with regard 10 discriminacion lnwi,,, bu1 hiri ng
managers arc sometimes overlooked dcspile their bei ng inregral 10 rhe rccru iring process.
Because lhe hiring manager will be lhc supcn•isor of new hires, she or he wi ll also play
a large role in lhe applicanrs· decisions. En listing lh e highest levels of managemenr as recruit-
er> can also help a11rac1 lop 1alen1 . Ralph Larsen, fo rmer CEO of Johnson & Johnson. rravelcd
ro key college campuses 10 rc:cruir rop raleni. 50 Because rop research 1alenr is di ffic ult 10 find
and a11rac1, California business leaders solicited rhe governor's help in recruiting top 1alcn1 1ha1
could produce more innovations and products for C alifornia's high-tech indusrries. California
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger called lop profess ors across lhe United Stares 10 offer rhem a
chance lo work for 1he Uni versity of Cnhfomia. 51
COWORKERS Jusl as hiring managers can dissuade candidares from accep1ing job offers, so can
lhc candidates· prospective coworkers. Po1en1ial hi res oflen seek our current and pa.1 cmploy-
,es 10 learn aboul 1he realities of 1hc job and orga nizat ion. Thus, every employee and former
employee can serve as 3 recruiter, and oflen do w hether rhcy intend 10 or 001. The Container
Store's en1husias1ic employees do a greal job conve ning rbe company's customers in1o_cmploy-
m . However, if in another organization cusromers cons isrently he_ar employc~s complain of low
pay, poor working conditions. and bad supcn•ision, 1hc y arc nol likely 10 se nously consider 1he
organizarion as a potential e mpl oyer. Unhappy emp loyees are nol hkely 10 refer fne nds and fam-
ily members 10 an orgnnizarion in which they do nor enjoy working. nor plan for len
gthy careers
wilh the organizarion themselves. Because any employee can affect a po1en1ial appl
icanr's decision 1~ pursue_ employment
with on organization ii is wise for companies 10 recognize emp loy~•• potc nrral r~cruuing
· ' · · 1 · positive Giving employees in fomm•
rmpac1 and do wha1 they can 10 ensure 1har 1hcir 1m pac rs . · . . d .
· • h I place ,n 1he organrzarron an recru11-
11on about how lo refer a po1enrral employee ro I c co~c . h He ler1 P11ckard ' or
' · · r t5' 10 foOn3ll00 !)1!3rc · W • ' I'
rng marcrials 10 distribute can focilrlalc opp ,can • nd sending small teams of
example, invesrs a considerable amount of time an d money training a
Chapter 1 • Rcmiiling 181
182 Chapter 7 • R("CJUiun~ , 0 n~ ruil thdr fulUJ"C coworkers. T
h_c idea is to g ive appfica
cns1m .. ""Crs and mana~crs_ 1 . 11
re 50 th.:al ihc y con make rn fo m1cd decision
s ab " Ls a ~Ilse
of ti1 ,, irh tht.' orgamzauon !,Cu u
ou1 Pllrsu1
•· Ii • ·00 op.vv1 um 11 cs.--
ng
b~ tnn SJ ,_.. r wly hin:d ~rso n's coworkers con also affect a
, .
The clunK'tensucs o a ne ,,- .
-.:cruucr'
- lfco" orkcrs don't suppon a new hin : 's efforts. to pcrfo nn hrs or her
best, lhe new h, s ' ""·
= hi h porenuaJ Co" orkcrs somcumes pn:ssure each orher lo ma in,,.• rt •,11
norll ,·e up lo sorer · . . be
.. l.UJR c
. 1 1 d d,scourogc new hin:s from try ing
10 come nu e busters" b •11.11,
producuon e~•e s~n u·on nom1 s eo,, orkc rs or learn members
can a lso create an y c-'c~.
,ng the group s prvuuc · . . th h
h unple
. , lcomc new lure mcre.litng e c .onces t
at he o r she w'IJ a.s..«
environment ,or an un,, " · · ' . .
• quit Th
someumcs happens if the group's pn: fcrn:d cand1da1e ". nol ~ho,
cn. The g roup migh1 al . ij
ro help a new hire succeed on the job. despite_ ~c_pcrson s ab1l11y
a nd mo1iva1ion lo do so SO r~
,llll ti., unin1enu onal. bur II under scon:s why II s ,mponan1 for H
R personnel lo follow u~ ~•
nc" h, n:s. The goal is 10 cnsun: t hat they ~ave_ rhc tools, _Ir.li ning
, and s uppon rho, they nc 111,
succccd. In , hon. n,cn,itcrs can h elp ,dcnufy h1gh-_po1enual empl
oyees, bu1 employees nc,: lo
resoW't'Cs and opportuni1y 10 11,·e up 10 Uleir porcnual.
~
TRAINING AND DEVELOPING RECRUITERS
If dJ~ercnl rttl'Wtcrs ~o nor loo~ fo r tile sa~1c compclencics, v~Jucs,
and experience in potential
• pphc4J1 ts, mlllly qualified applic ants arc likely I~ be o verlooked
, and many undesirable ap I,.
Cllllts on, likely 10 be encouraged 10 apply. Rccniuer training and
developmen t helps I P
. . o--cons1stcncy m lt'nns of what rccruucrs screen for and the messages they commu nicmc about the job and company.
NOl muc~ rcsearc~ exists a~ur f c a mount of trainin~ recru~r~rs ":cei,
•e . hu1 surveys sugcesr
thaJ m:iny rN'.fllHers rcce1,·e very li ttle. J When they do rccc1\'C u.:un
mg, u l ends to focus on ad .
,SU'3ri,·e lllld procedural {paperwo rk) issues."" However, the resea
rch 1ha1 docs exist has m:•·
possible 10 idenufy training areas tha t an: likely 10 make recruiters
more e ffec tive. Table 7. 2 su 11
nwizcs lhcsc key ~ . Nc.'(l. we discuss each in more detail.
n,.
Recruiting Knowledge
A rccnu1er's knowledge can be enh anced in a number o f ways. Fo
r example. when UPS w.
lyzed the characr~ri5lics of_all o f the workers in one or_ its dis
tricts, ii found 1ha1 cmploytt,
tended 10 cluster into fi ve d1Sunc 1 groups. By u nders1and,ng the
demograp hic and psycholog,.
cal charac1~ris1ics o_r each grouJ >--lheir ages. career stages. and
so fonh-and by identifying
the type of in fonnauon each gro up responded 10 . UPS was able 1
0 trai n recruiters lo tailor thcu
recruiuncor p11chcs lo appeal 10 a pplican ts from each group.
55
Interpersonal Skills
Recnin ers can be trained 10 deve l op bcucr interpersonal s kills and
behaviors. Because applicanli
~1th lmutcd mfonn_ation about th e organi,ation 10 which they arc
applying may infer charactcns-
ucs oflhe orgamz.11Jon from the1r exp:ricnce wuh the recruiter. n.,--
cruitcrs sho uld be u-ajned in hov.•
10 reflect th~ company 's culture and values, how 10 project warmth a
nd empa thy . 11nd how roga,o
10 appl,cnnl s trust Tr.umng can also im prove a rccruirer's Jistcning and co
mm unic.11ion skills.
Presentation Skills
Prcscnuu on ~k.J l/s c.10 be helpful lo rccnmcrs a11cndrng j ob fairs,
recrui ring o n college campuses.
or mal.Jng 3 " } son of fonnal prcsc niat,on o f l
hc organization 's job op portun ir ics. Many potential
■(-j:j,pj Recruiter Training Areas • Rtcru1tmg knowledge
• Interpersonal sk,lls
• Presentation skJ/ls
• The organization's goals and r ecru,t1ng objectives
• legal issues
Multiple assessmen ts
• Applicant att raction
-
.nn1ican1s ' fi rsl exposure 10.an or gan1z:11ional reprcscn10.1ivc is at
fi .
.,., u·on is sloppy or docs n t com mu nicarc cnou('l'h . a
onnal prescn1auon. If the pre•
senra . . . . . e- meaningful rnfonn I' h
P ly 10 1he orgon1 za t1on.
1 rarnrng can eve n improv .a 10n, t cy may decide nor
10 ap e 3 " mfonnaJ pnch 10 u po1cn1ial r
ecruit
Th• organization's Goals and Recruiting Objectives
o<t imponanr than a recru iler' s background or whether h
. .
M organizatio n is thar she or he has a s trong sense of the orl ; 0
~:cruu~r 15 internal _or cx1cmal ro
~ recruiting objecti ves. For example. Canada 's Scoriabanf G at,o_n s goals. bu
siness ~rr.uegy,
"' all aspects o f ils staffing pro gram. Diversity objccti rou
p integrates us diversuy goals
1~10 d sclec rion program for both us h1r' vcs arc a
~art of its recrui tment. inter•
view, an . . . mg managers and recnmer
s. Hinng m.:anagers learn
proPriate quesu ons 10 ask 1n a se lection in1crv1cw as \\ ell .
. . .
apdh•crsc workforce. 56 as rccru11mcn1 strategics fo r creatin
g
11 Rccr_u!ring q uickly 3 1 the lowest cosr
r_cquires different rccnurer skills and behaviors than
doCS rccru1u ng for the top talent avai lable m a given
profession. In some cases. the recruiter
will be expcc1cd ~~ evaluate and.scre en applican ts. In ot her words, he
or she will serve the dual
purposes of r~cru111 ng and se lect mg. In other cases, the recruiter w
ill be expec ted 10 only ans"'Cr
general questions posed b~ recruu s or IO focus on s1imula1ing 1arg
e1cd people's in1eres1 in 1hc
pasilion. Fortuna1~ly, both mlcrn nl and ex1emal recruiters can be e
nsily trafoed wirh regard 10 an
organiiation 's business s1ratcgy and recruiung goals.
Leg1I Issues
LegaJ training i~ critical 10 cst~b .lis_hing and mainrainmg a consis
tent, effective recrui ting and
.applicanr..scrccnmg system. This 1s rmportanr if an organization ever h
as 10 defend us rccruning
and staffing practices in a court of law. For example. as you learned in
Chapter J, 1hc Nauonal
Labor Relations Act (NLRA) ex 1ends many rights 10 workers \\'
ho wish 1o form. join, or sup•
pon unions. Employers also cannol d iscri minate aga.ins1 pro• un ion ap
plicants . .. Salling'' occ ur.)
when union organizers seek jobs al a nonun ion company in order
ro persuade the \\Orkcrs 10 join
1 unfo n. 57 Because nn emp loyer violates
Secuon 8(a)( J) of rhc NL RA by mal ing s1a1emen1s
(hat union applicants will not be hircd,
58 inrervic\\'ers must be trai ned in how to appropnate ly
rcsp:,nd 10 salting 1ac11cs.
Salting is only o ne of 1he many lcJ!al si1uations fim1s have 10 dca
.l with. Finn s also ha, c to
minimize lhe chances that any ill egal discri minatory rccnuri ng is
laking place. T raining can also
help recruiters become aware o f any biases they have and give th
em too ls to minim11.c lhe hkch•
hood that they wi ll discriminalc un intentionally.
59
Multiple Assessments
Recruilers and hiri ng managers c a n also be trained to assess candi
dates for po~it io ns other
than the one curre ntly being fill ed . Even if rhe company isn' t cu
rrently looking for a panieulor
candidate 's skills and expert ise , rhe company may need these c
ompe tencies in lhe futu re or in
a job other than 1hc one being re cru ited for. In addition 10 trainin
g rccruners about huw to pro•
file candidates nor curren tly be ing hired and assess 1heir fi t wi
th multiple po~iri ons, rcc ruuers
can be trained in rhc c reation an d use of a special 1.:a lcnl dat.:abasc
tha1 might be refere nced in
rhc fut ure for other openings. T hrough relationship mmkcting.
recrui ters can keep in con1ac1
" 'ilh candidates in the database and mainrni n their in1crcst in
the company. much as Valero
Energy docs.
Applicant Attraction
After identifying where good np phcanl~ a.re, rccruj ters can the~
~ trained _10 d1sseminn1c e ffcc•
live recruiting messages to activ e job seekers as well as to passiv
e JOb c~nd1date~ t.o a1Lracl th~m .
As we have mentioned, passi ve j ob candidales o flcn require more
act~ve rccnmmg. Atte nd ing
trade shows and professional conf ere nces and nc1working w11h po
rc nual appllcnnls can hel p a
~ cniilcr develop rela1i onships w i1h them rhar can be rapped in th
e_ fut ure . How ro sran c~nvers,~-
lions with poten tia l applicants a nd how to tactfully in troduce th
e tdca of _consrdcn_ng ullcmor, c
employment opportunities with rhe recruiter's organiuuion can
be prnc~1ce~. Trmnrng can also
enhance recruiters' persuasion s ki lls and ability to sell 1hc j ob a
nd organ1La11on.
Ch3plcr 7 • Recruiting 183
184 Chapcer 7 • R<l.."TUIIU\$
RECRUITING METRICS . .
h i ,clcd ihe righl rccnutcrs and u-:uncd 1hc111 well• St
Ho"' docs a fimi know_if II
as~ \c1udc hiring speed, number of hires ach ieved andard err,
• , enn:d recnuuns rnctncs 1 • be , I h IJCr rec ·
cicnC)·OI\ lure Allhough these mem cs ca n usc,u, t cy arc not alwa . l'll11er,
ll!ld thc 3\ct'llge cost per · •·· the bcsl recrui ting ou1comcs to trac k. Take for c Ys lied 101
NJSincss'ssu,uegy :snd may nol"" . · xamp1
. lh4 assembled a recruiting team 10 a1trac1 senior soft ware . e, 011c
maJor so.fiwDTC co~~yb -~ Because the cyc le for hiring these indi viduals can archnee1k
the ke) cmplovccs in 1IS us, · · be f . b th exceed ,
· urc iis recrui1ers on the num r o JO s ey fill as mu h •lie
'"ars. the firm docs no1 mras . h h c as on •·
· 'tied 'ndl dual s they identify and the relauons 1ps I ey erea1e with lh 60 1,~
nurnbcr of quail 1 1 VJ . the cm.
lndero. because some positions ha"e a grealcr •~pact on . company lhan do Others
. .,. . •• 1- key positions more hcaV Jly in their overall assessment of h • SO!ne
finns pnonllle or "'c1.,, . ti , . . ow ~ 1
,ndlnduaJ rccruiiers ha,c performed. Ho"·e,~r, 1 f a '"'.1 _s resources arc hm11ed, the com e I
. ly the suifline resulis of 11S key po s1uons. Because the pcrforrnan• ilaJly
somcwnes :i.ssesses on • , ki .th d 'ffi 1
.. -core,
. be compromised when !hey re wor ng w, 1 ,cu t hinng manage eq
grc31 rccrullers c:sn . • 11 bl rs. SOtnc.
times firms make adjusuncnis for lhis foctoras _"cll a s other uncontro a c factors rccrui1ers race.61
The following is a list of sU11teg1c metncs one HR expcn recommends mcasuring:62
• ,v,., /tin job µrformanct: The on-the-job performance ratings for ne w employees
6 10 12 months after being hired .
• Nt., hirt failurt rat~: The pereen1age of new hires in key jobs who were tcrrninaicd Or
asked 10 leave. • Turno>tr of nt., hirts: The percentage_ of emp
loyees who volu~tanl~ quit wiihin ih,u
first year, or the average 1cnure of new hires com pared lo the finn s 1yp1cal lenure.
• Manag,r slllis/«tion: The perceniage of key m anagers who arc sat isfied wilh the hiring
process and the candida1es.
• Ntw hirt sans/action: The perecn1age of appli cants and new hires in key jobs who ar,
sausfied with the hiring process.
• N,., hirt tim~ to productivity: The time i1 takes for new hires 10 mce1 1he linn 's minimum
OUlpul Slandanis.
• Training sucuss: New hires' scores on any man da1ory ini1ial 1rainin!! 1es1s 1hcy arc gi"'"
Tracking the ou1comes rccruilers achieve can h elp a firm 10 idcniify areas tha1 can be
unpro,·ed. If lhe best rccruilers can be identified. it can also be possible lo idcniify what makes
them successful (profile them) and use this inform a1ion when hiring and !raining 01hcr recrui1m.
Setting Recruiters' Goals
Recruiters' goals must be consis1cn1 with the orga nization's objectives and staffing stra1cgy. Ao
organization usually selS specific goals for their rccrui1ers' activities al job fairs. conferences,
interviews, and so fonh. including communicatin g the employer's value proposi1ion, screening
candJda!es, and generating candida1es· in1crcs1 in 1he position and organita1ion. For a recrui1er10
pursue the organization's goals, the organization 's goals mus1 be known by 1hc recruilcr and be
consisteni with !he recruiter's personal goals. Re crui1crs are likely 10 have their own goals and
mou,auons. including being liked, hiring people from their alma ma1ers, and enjoying a break
from !heir normal work routines. 63 Mon iloring their behavior is usually very diffi
cuh for orga·
mzauons, panicularly when lhe rccrui1cr is worki ng off-site. This makes it even more 1mponan1
lha1 goals of rccrui1ers are aligned with the goals of their finn s.
Many rccrui1ers know ,·cry li1tlc about !he succes s of their recruiting cffons other lhan ihr
number of positions Ibey have filled, their averag e time-to-fill for a given position, and so fonh.
Ho"cver, _an or~anization's rccru11ing goals arc li kely much more complex. Ah hough many pos·
sible metncs e.us110 evalua1e rccrui1ers' cffec1ive ncss, their pcrfonnance is nol likely 10 change
un less they rcce,"e feedback as 10 how they arc doing and how they can
improve. Giving _ihem
feedback also helps lo reinforce wh.11 they' ve lear ned through training and helps rccrui1crs ,den·
ufy and self-correci their performance shoncom ings. Without this f~cdback. rccrui1ers cannOI
know wha1 they should be doing differently.
. For th
e_fccdback 10 be mos1 effcc1ivc, clear goals 1ha1 arc based on
1he organizaiion's key
recruiung obJcnr1 es should firs1 be sci for recru, 1crs. If 1he organi za1ion is in1crcstcd in hiring
customer sen 1cc rcpreseniati" 1 ff · 'blc 1hC
es O sia a new 1elcphonc center as quickly as poss, ·
pony's goals balancing hiring speed wilh acce I bl .
cornblished- Jf the open posi1ion is a "feeder posi ti P ~-
1 c levels 0 '. Job performance should be
;::s linked to new hire promo1abili1y may also ~\c~;d:;orc 1mponan1 posi1ion, rccrui1cr b()lh the intended and unintended consequences of
O 1
· 11 is imponant 10 1hink through
h viors and outco mes arc being motivated Giv' ny goa_s 10 ensure tha1 the proper rccrui1er
~ \e 10 their goals can help them undcrs;and :~ rcc~ ncrs feedback on their performance
re auf recrui1ers' development needs 81 1 cy need 10 do differently as well a,
ldenll Y '
GIVlll9 Recruiters the Incentive to Meet T heir Goals
()nC siudy found that only about onc-fou nh of i n-house rccruii . .
On !heir own, rather than company- wide, performa
nce levels 61 cTrsoorccocf111•c ihncenuve pay b?5cd
h I . . co, owcvc
r, rccruucrs
.~ rewarded for s on-1crm goa s such as the n umber ofJ'obs ihc fill h aJ
~· . . . . y I or I e 101 compensa-
uon of the people thcy recru n. If hinng speed is all 1ha1 is rewarded, the quali1y or a firm's new
hireS is likely to be lower lhan if boih new hire qua n1i1y and qual11y arc rewarded. Al Ad\'anccd
Technology Services _ (ATS), a company 1ha1 _m ainlai_ns ~omplex foc1ory equipment for major
manufac1urers ,nclud,~g Honda a~d GE, qualny or hue 1s more imponan1 than 1hc number or
hiteS or the umc to hire. Accordingly, ATS rccru i1ers arc cvalua1ed on their hires' one-year
reiention raies. 65
Given 1ha1 the rewarded behaviors and ou1come s arc 1he ones recrui1crs arc mosl likely 10
~uc, it is impcrati_ve 1ha1 the fi'.111:s incen1ivc ~ys1cm be well designed and well 1cs1cd before
being rolled oul. llus can help chmrna1e any un1n1 cndcd consequences or the new sys1c111. For
,:.xample, a sludy of how Navy recruiters rcac1cd 10 a rccrui1ing incenu ve plan 1ha1 included
quoias, prizes, and other s1andar?s found 1h31 re cruiting producti\'IIY was highcsl in the period
imrnedia1ely prior to lhe quo1a/pnzc cu1off dale a nd lo" eSI immcd1a1ely aflcrward. Additionally,
the average qualily of 1hc people recrui1ed fell as the cu1off dale approached,6
6 which was not the
foieot of the incentive sys1cm.
Although recruiting produc1ivi1y as measured by the 101al base compensation of new hires
and the speed with which 1hcy are rccruilcd can b e cn1cria 10 use 10 re"•ard recruncr.., using 1hcm
in isolation docs not mo1ivatc rccrui1ers 10 hire the bcs1 possible 1alen1. An cffcc1ive inccn1ivc
sys1cm aligns lhe goals of Ilic organiza1ion with the recruiters' goals. Rewarding recruiters for
recruiting good employees who remain wilh the f irm and perform well can do a great deal 10 ahgn
the hiring goals of the organi1a1ion with the recru i1cr's personal goals. For example, the 1clccom-
munica1ions company T-Mobile gives i1s rccrui1c rs quancrly bonuses pegged 10 their individual
performance goals. The goals, which musl supp on 1he firm's corpor:uc-wide goals, arc drafled
by recruiters and approved by T-Mobilc's mana ~crs.67 If a recru11ing function is 1ca111 based '. i1
is imponant 10 link the 1eam·s rewards 10 beha11ors 1ha1 suppon 1hc effecuvcncss of the enurc
1eam. A balanced inccn1ivc plan 1ha1 considers all the organ1za1ion·s long-1crm and shon-tcrm
s1ta1egic hiring goals will beuer mo11va1e recruilc rs 10 mccl the organ1,a1ion' s muluplc goals.
GLOBAL RECRUITING
Organizations must sometimes recruit talent fro m other countries. This 1ypically requires_ both
a global markc1ing and applicanl a11rac1ion str a1cgy as we ll as shared services, rnduding a
consistent cmploymenl brand and a centralized 1echnology sys1cm: It is al so_ helpful if leaders
lhroughou1 the organi1a1ion use a consb 1cn1 lang uage when drscuss1ng 1alcn1 issues, and~ co'."·
d h Id 68 C nd1da1e processing and hmng acuv,ucs
mon process for assessing 1alen1 aroun I e wor • a . (fl
· · · · d liancc arc 1yp1cally managed locally.
mcluding sourcing, cand1da1e evaluauon. an co mp
DEVELOPING APPLICANT ATTRACTION ST RATEGIES
1 slale in lo sufficient numbers of quality appli -
Having a great job oppor1uni1y docs nol a ways t ran . . be' c they arc willing 1o apply. One
. d ihosc oppor1un111es ,or .
cants. Applicants must be a11rac1c . 10
70 d b P rofessor Sara Rynes suggcslS 1ha1 apph-
popular model of applicanl auracu on devclop c Y the iypes of rewards the firms offe r
. . ·. I employers 10 assess
cants gather informauon about poienlla . . . ments They also look for signals 1ha1
and 10 determine whether 1heir skill s mccl thc Job s require tion This helps po1cnual applica
nlS
help lhem identify 1hc cu hurc and climale of ih e organilll ·
Chaplcr 7 • Recruiting 185
.... I I I I I I I
186 C'lur<rr 7 • Rc,.-nimng
J\U GE
lll!,t.\1)
<L<..<c>s !heir lokcly fit " i1h the JOb and lh~ finn. When applic~nts ~ aurac1ed lo a r,
= mon: hkcly 10 apply for jobs, ;]C("epl JOb offers. and rema in wnh the company o,~• lhc)
1'c.,t. "c discuss !he role of organizational image . employer brand, and the recruiting
m: ~ni,
10 applicant aurncuon. !sig,
Developing the Organiut ion's Imag e a nd Bra nd
Given lhc limiled amount of informatio n most applicants have early in the jo
b search
mmaJ ap1plrcotion decisions arc largely ba sed on general impressions of organil.'.IC
Pr0ccs~
11 . • , . If d . od
ional a1,~-
ti, encs,. 1 E>e,y orgamzauon has an una ge ,or 1tsc an its pr ucts, whether it
is ""'·
ords . th I l . d h
proactl\,
eslllblrshing it or noL The firsl" or images a' come o mm w en som
eone thinks in
a parucular company generally n:Oecl l he company s image. However, the im
age 3 abou 1
-• · · f h · · JlCrson~
:lboui :lll organiz:mon is his or her cencrw 1 mpn:ss1on o l c organrzauon based 00
boih , . h • • , · be
,e,1,0,.
and facts. and may nol be aecurale. An organ1zauon s ,magc may positive
or ncgativ .,
or strong, clear or vague. and images ca n va,y from person to person and chan
ge o,•er Ce, ~fal: . . . . 0 . .
14 b h •me.
Orgaruzauonal images can in ucnce rcc ru,ung outcomes ut ave been fou
nd
XTOSS subgroups of individuals. In one study, corporale executives and colleg
e under lodd,rr.,
. . . ral l . . 75 E . b d th · ·
gra uai,s
disagreed 10 lhe,r ove corpor.llc ima ge raungs. xccut1vcs ase cir i
mage asse
oo economic perfonnancc indicators and deutiled knowledge of lhc companies
in !heir ,:men~
College studen ts' image assessments, o n lhc olher hand, tended lo be innucnced
more h USlr)
b , ·1· ·lh ·•- · · ( ·
• od ca,,11 y exposure 10, or ,am, mnty WT • uic or
gan1zauon using 11s pr ucts, knowin g some .
works !hen:. scciog lhc organization's adv enisemcnts, CIC.) .
76 Not s urpri singly, bei ng :nc •ho
10 a gn:aler amounr of positive infonna 1ion aboul lhe organization enhanced
the organi · •~
. I d . ased d d ' . . f
za oas
image as an cmp oyer .~ mere un ergra ualcs_ •~renuons o pursui
ng cmploymenL n
College undcrgraduales image assessm ents of organ1zauo~s as employer, were
found 10 be
malleable and_ 1ndependen1 of !heir asse ssments of lhe orgamzalion 's corpora1
e unage, suggm
tng th.u orgaruzauons !hat do not have high-profile corporale images may sr
ill be able 10 c .
pelC successfully for undcrgradua1c s1u~ enrs in -~ • i~itial s1ages of !heir job c
hoice 1hrough 0 :
use of rccru,tmenl messages lha1 eSlllblr sh a posiuve image for lhe organi zatio
n as an emplo
Because dilTcrtnl subgroups of people base !heir corporate image assessm
ents on diffc~%
factors, ~,ITen:nt mc1hods may_ meet "'.i lh differing success in ahering an org
a niLalion's imlgc
among d11Tcn:nt groups. and d11Tcn:n1 m fonna11on aboul the organ ization ma
y need 1o be pro-
vided to appeal 10 different types of recr uits.
a T)fflho/,c r,aMn of aJJ IN mfonnatJD ,r
N1ftl'l«tdtoaC'lJr"9Xll'l, or ttsprrx !»cu
. A brand _is a symbolic p1c1urc of all lhe in fonnation connected 10 a company o
r its prod-
ucrs. indudmg IIS image. Organ11ations of1cn lry lo link !heir images and con
sumer brands wilh
!heir b".51ncss s1ra1cgies. For example, for many people Nieman-Ma.rcus, Go
ldman Sachs, and
~ITany s p~bably conjure images of elite. high-quality, and expensive product
s and semces.
1/hc_n you lhmk of Walman and Dell Co mpu1cr you probably lhink of low-co>
I goods and higfi.
effic1ency work processes. These compa nies crca1ed consumer brands for them
selves 1hat renec1
f~lll'W I EH BRA \'D
r rjluu llh.J/Ot'OMpan ~c,J/rff ,nu n
tmpf0Jrr m1d l,rlp1 fl'JCl!Ulj r mun w/
and ruunof par rp11011rv/" fk1t,, 11 l14r 10 11 orl:. tlwrr
their business stra1co1cs Bra ds , . .
~ · n arc o,1en rcprcsenled by s ymbols mcludmg name,. logos, slo-
g~. or designs. Image and brand rcco gni1ion are crea1ed by the accumulati
on of experiences
w11h lhc specific product or sc . bolh d. " . .
. rv icc, 1rccuy rclaung 10 its u se, and through 1he influence of
communicauons. adverus1ng. des ign. an d media exposure. 7S
Deve loping the Organization's Em ployer Brand
Finns oflcn crafl emplorer bra ds n naJ and ex,crnaJ · . "
10 re Ccl ••h31 lhey offer as employers a nd 10 manage inter·
pcn:cpuons of wha1 ii is like I k the 1ht
que511on .. Wh v should I k 1
, 0 war re. An employer brand answ
c~
. , \\ Or ICre , .. and innuc I ' . . . b 79
Many faerors, includ, · . . . • nces pcop e s mlcnlJ ons 10 apply fo
r JO s.
ronmc ntaJ aec,dcni, and ng recogn u ,on '" bcs1 employer'' surveys, ethic
s vioh11ions. cn11•
· corpora1e ph1lan1hrop f' ·1· ·el)
and nc¥a ll\cly Mosi pco I Y, may a ,eel an organi zation's imag
e pos1" !O
Re . pc wan1 lo be me mber f . .
. c
sean: h has consis lcnily fou nd lhai lhe s O an organ1zauon 1hat has a favorab
le ,mag ·
more people are likely 10 .d more favorable a company'
s image and brand an:, !he cons, er the orga n, zai· .
d iu
n:cru11ing ad,cnisc mcnrs 11 TI ion a11ract1vc as an employer and rcs
pon to
. · us suggc;is that n 1
· h " cal
or noncxment brands "'II h ewer or esscr-know n organi1a1ions wll
ave grca1cr d1flicuhy · . . ·unrnl
source,, such as ne " spape d . a11rac1ing apphcan1s us ing passive rc
cru1
fa1orably 1hou• h1 of Co r a ,cn,scmc nts, lhan organiau ions !hat are more
widely known and
• · mp.1n1cs such as JB~I J h 1. , of
· 0 nson & Johnson, and Nike invc sl 3 ~
,.oncY buildi~g and main1ain ing a ccnain employer brand. Rich Fl
,
·•CC nres1den1 of world wide human rcsou-e ocrsch, McDonald s exccu-
a•-t .. •·- " s. stales .. I re 11 1>c1·
ploymcnl brand thu1 you can have is o ne where 1
• a Y icve !hat the s1ronges1
~,·rcompanies. Our goa l is lo continue 10 build lliatcmp o
yefes say 18 ~Y arc proud 10 work for
,~ . . sense o pnde .. -
AUracung 1hc nght employees and m ain1ainin th · ·.
~vel is an imponanl pan of building and supponing
8 0
fi cir ,com mllmcnt lo pcrfonm al a high
, :•cwisc the strength of 1he consumer brand plays ''."' s CUSlomer brand fo r i
1s producrs.
.... ' an 1mponant f · · ·
le 10 work for !he company. Once emp loyed lhe .d h ro ~ m anract,ng
lhe right
::;';epu1ation helps main1ain !heir loya lly and co~mi:;;,• ~
1 c! s,han: in lhc company 's exicr-
pr1ll!lises 10 its ~uslomcrs.83 . en 10 c ivcr on lhc company's brand
An effecuve employer brand d1ffcremia1e s 3 finn fro ·1
. . .
. 1 . 1
. . m Is compeu1 ors and 1s appealing 10
, ... cicd apphcanlS. 11s a so cn11cal 1ha1 lhe company dcliv · 1
' .
-• er on its emp oyer brand promises In
ihe ase of Vauh.com and 01her ln1crne1 sires where employees h h •
. . ·
r, . . s are l cir experiences w11h one
onolhcr, "'.h~I a ,nn prom1~es versus delive rs to i1s employees will generally be wide
ly known.
If people 1010 an organ1 zauon ex~cun g that the finn holds cenain values and
will provide a
coruin 1ypc of employment _cxpenence, lhcy an: likely to lcaYc if their expectation
s arc nol met.
Theg~ of employer brao di~g. ,s 00110 fool po1cn1ial apphcanrs bu
t to effectively communicarc
ihe rum ~ ~cssagc of what ll 1n1cnds 10 pro vide as an employer.a. As one employer bra
ndi ng
expert said, 'The purpose of the employe r brand proposition is not to invenl a fu n
hcr set of val-
ues. bul to h_clp 10 en su re thal lhe purpose and v alue slatcmcnrs tha1 currently ex isl an: 1
ranslarcd
inlo something relevant and meaningfu l lo employees. and made consistent wi
th the values !he
organization wishes to project exicrnall y."85
Jo Piclc~, global vice presidcnl of rccru itmenl for Philips in the Netherlands, ,
talcs, .. In
my view, winning lhe war for 1alcn1 mean s primarily focusing on retention of you
r curren1 talenr
and following lhal, building a slrong posi tio n in your key labor markers. Therefore.
a brand that
~ only visible in external communicatio ns is less valuable than a brand 1ha1 is tr
ul y lived in side.
Each and every employee should ac1 as an ambassador of your brand and 1ha1 requ
ires a strong
and recognized inlernal and external employ ee value proposition:·
36
Lucy Chang, lalcnl acquisition senior manager for Sun Microsys1ems. Hong
Kong, adds,
"I am a strong proponcnl of employer branding. Ir is the basic fundamenlal of
any n:cruitmenl
slllllegy. You have 10 know who }OU an: as a company, your messaging, and wha1 is
your competi-
tive advantage agai nst 01hcr companies. Ir is a long-1cnn s1ra1cgy, which I lhink
many compan ies
fail to recognize. •-8 7 Table 7-3 contains some popular compa
nies and !heir employer brand slogans.
It can be wonhwhilc fo r any organization 1 0 evaluate its brand among its 1argc1ed a
pplrcnnt
pools and take slcps 10 make ii as slro ng and positive as possible before laun
ching a recruiting
campaign. One study fo und lha1 the 1hre e most cffcc1i,•e brn nd,ng lechniques u
sed 10 appeal to
college graduates were buildi ng relations hips wi1h key fac uhy, appearing al camp
us career fairs.
and supporting lhc activities of student org anizations on campus.
88
Many organizations spend a lol of money to II)' to infl uence !heir ove rall image
and their
lnnd as an employer. For example, Hewle u-Packard, Home Depot, and McDona
ld's have all
run lelcvision adveniscmcnrs designe d solely to promole their brands as e
mployers. Merrill
Lynch spent around Sl50 million in a single year in image ad, to reinforce i
ts new brand as a
lccb-savvy company. 89 Even as early as 1990, U.S. companies
spenl over Sl.4 billion on adver-
tising intended just 10 crea1c a favorabl e impression of ihcmselvcs.
90 . . . .
If an organization wan1s lo distinguis h itself as an employer, focusmg on m
flucnc,ng ns
symbolic meani ng as an employer ca n be an effective s,rarell:
91-for examp_lc, _whether 1hc
company is lhoughl of by applicanls as 1rendy, prcsligious, or mno,·auvc an
d ns_ Jobs thought
of positively in lcnns of lhcir focalion . pay, and benefits. Given the power n:
peuuvc marketing
NtM!ii• Employer Brand Slogans Johnson & Johnson: •small Company
Environment, 819 Company Impact"
Eli Lilly: "lnnova11on Has a Face: Our P eople"
Medtronic: "Caree rs with a Pass,on fo r Lile" •
h M k o,Herence ,n Your World
Abbott Labs: "Inspired to Ac ,eve. a ea
Sharp: "From Sharp Minds Come Sha rp Products"
Chaplcr 7 • Rccruiling 187
188 0Llp1cr 7 • RC\..TWling d • .. lo)'CCS should be trained in ho w 10 cons isicnily
m c,;·::. ... '3g:cs h.1,c. n."C'nJl~~rs and :: 1:\Cry opponunity. One expert belie ves that !Ila na :ncJ clrarlt
promo« 111< e_ mplo) cr • bran 1 . 1,.. , srunc ""Y t
hey would market their produ 1 8 rs •hoo1d
. ·c· 10 app 1can :; u,1; . . . cs to
marke t their comparu :; ers nn:n themselves with a bnef pnch des igned 10 nttract tal Ct.1:-.torn.
ers.. He. suggests_ ~h:u m::;:;! rcneur's piich, this speech should be concise and co,n t~' at the drop o l • har. Like an . PH .. ·i· the comMny different? Whal is its vis ion ? Wh pc hns. '"
d . • Id . th • ques uo ns: o, ... :; ,..- · a1 1s it :>uou ,:iru \\'Cr \;., Wh should a 1alcn1cd person join? \Vhat bcne~L'li d ocs the compan scorn.
pcuu,cud, ~nuage . bYI. hi a positi\'C employer brand lakes time to do we ll Yof frr't)2
f>roacu,dy csla 1s . ng . d' . • and can . Q_l In addition 10 developing the image and_ lhc bran mg s tr~tcgy, pnnt advc . _be
c."<pen~t, t!. ,·y b ·,e .... dio and television commcn:.·1als. and e ven articles in laroc, d rtJs111g campa.iS?ns. 11 l e SI • ... · • , ( , be . o e
Ola • ~ - ., Th• Boston Consulung Group s "ww. g.c om) sue for new c g,.
zincs may ~ crcntcu. ... .1 1 . o nsulta
and F,-dcralc:d Ocp:utmenl S1ores's Rerailology (www.rc1ru o ogy.com ) sue for college rtcn,'b ing arc good examples of how to promote a de sirab le ~mployer ~rand on lin e. l'he "work
.in n.
G 1 .. 'deos o n YouTubc pro mote Google as a unique expcnence where you "cnjo Rai
00 : c ~ do it and the people you d o it with." Some organizatio ns· product ad Y '4ha1
you 0
·. " Jedi~ yo~icro;ofl and Siemens. arc designed clearly to attract talented people veni.sc. mcn ts. 1.nc u ng . . . C T . 1
to ...,art there. Because they can highlight the orga~1 uiuon ~ ac1 111cs, c~ p oy~cs. c ustomers, Produ
cts,
:ind work processes. employer brand advertiseme nts can be effcct1 vc l~.s ho wn o n_ tclcvisio n. i0o
Comparu'cs including VcriLon and Home Depot have dc_vclopcd TV comm~n:ials " that "sell~
their employer brands 10 viewers. Employer brand ndvcrt1sen:-~nts c an be pan,cularly hclpfo J for
smaller or Jcsscr• known organizations that lack name recogmuo n.
Clc,·eland-bascd J,;ink National Caty Corpor_,nfon e valuates job c andidates by sceins ho..
they perform in a computerized simuJauon of_spccdic !~b-~latcd tasks. The s imulation also re in.
forces the company's br:ind by showing rccru1':' what II s hke to be an c ~ployec a r the eompan) ,
One company representative states. "We think It crea1es a unique 1mprcss1o n that lets us sta nd OIJt
among o ur peers in the indusuy .. . . It gives us a way to share o ur story and what we· re aJI abouL ~
Magazines and other publications and orga nizations periodically assess employers in rcnns
of how good they 3l"C to work for. This can significantly enhance a firm's empl oyer brand. F onllnt
muazines an nual lists of lhc "100 Be.st Companies 10 Work For" and the " Bes t Compan ies ro,
1'-fi~oritics," Worki ng Motlru m,1gazine's annual li st of the ·· 100 Best Compan ie s for Work ing
Mot.hers," and the Amcric311 Association of Ret ired Persons ' list o f the " DeM Employ ers for
Worke rs over SO" arc good examples of such assessments. How an o rgan i1..a 1ion is reput ed 1o
t:ret11 ilS employees is likely 10 have a particularly sLrong effect o n how likely it i'li to aurac t apph-
canlS. This explains why many organizations are cager 10 appear o n lists s uc h a~ these.
But being an employer of choice can create challenges as well as o ppo r1un i1ics. Many
organialions arc not prepared 10 handle the increased vo lum e o f job app lica nts resulting from
being named an em pl oyer of choice. In the month following the a nnounce ment 1ha t E dward
Jone s was number o ne on For11me magazine's annual " 100 Bes t Companies w \ Vork For" IISI.
the number of job inquiries jumped by nearly 63 percent. The company claims lhat it w as ill!
because o f the Fortun~ slory and that II did no thing different in its o utreach act1\ itics. 95
The increased j ob seeker intercsl resulting from a positive brand is not nccc~sarily a nega•
tfre., but ii docs increase the burden on the organizati on's selection system. There i;; no gu arani«
that more apphcams mean higher applicant quality. However, engaging in a targe ted rcc ruillng
cffon 10 fi ll a particular opening can help a firm manage the number o f applications ii rc:cc 1, es
and increase the quality of its applicant pools. Meanwhile. the organita lio n' s posi ti ve empl oyer
brand sho uld a.Jlow it 10 improve us in1crv1c w and job offer acceplancc r~ucs. Another d o wnside
of such lists is tha1 once a company 1s on a "best companies to work for" lisl, it ri sks ncgali\ 'C pu~
hcity and negative reactions from existing employees if it later falls o ff the /is l. Al1houg h many
cmpl~)ers ~uvely try to be named 10 these lists. the compcli1io n for de velo pi ng e ... cr•,·rcat i\'~ 3nd
c,cr•mcrcas mg employee benefits rnighl not be so mething the organization wants to com mn 10·
1lus chapter's Develop Your Skills fear ure describes how 10 de velop a n employer brand .
De ve loping the Recruiting Message
Like a_ finn 's rccruuc rs. ima~c. and employer brand. 1hc recruiting message comrnun ic arcd 10
po1enual applicanLs will affec l rJie number and lypcs of them rhar wi ll apply. In additio n 10 com·
munrcau ng the na ture of the job oppor1unity that the compa ny is offering the message can create
or rcnect the co mpany's hra.nd as well. •
-
Rather than sim_P!Y Mating the core requirements o f the O . . .
\'C to cran the rc~~1ung message in the most appcalin and pen J>O_sn,on. n can be more cffe c•
U • n of the rccnuung message or ad can affect the g effective way. E ven the physi ca l
de,Slg • success o r a cam · Companies Lhal deve lop rcc ru iung campaigns and ads i pa_ign:
res,carth on how well d iffere nt rccru11ing mate ri als attra th or organizations have conduc1cd
nd djng 1hc different styles of 1hc ads colors fonts ~t . c aue nt ion of pote ntial applicants-
i ll es (in the case o f print ads).96 More rig~ '~~ s~zcs as we ll as how they're positioned OIi pag I n'als is l:ic king though rous, sc1enufically grounded research on rccruil•
""'"' ma e . . In any case, th e factors th m affcc1 what docs and d . .
rapidly. What was nove l and ffi· • , ocs not get lhc attenuon of applica nts can change . . c cCU\C a year ago may be obsolete today. TI1crcfo
rc,
a11y conclusions researche r~ draw from research s~ch as lhis arc likely 10 ha\'c a short lifcspan.9 7
Moreover, ~cause ~ompcltl ~rs can copy_an organization's recruiting programs, a fi rm co nstan tly
peeds to be 1nnovau vc whe n 1~ comes to Hs recruiti ng campaigns.
In t_cnns of the_ message Itself, unde rSlanding lhe goals and values of the taq:;cted applicants
and crafung a rccrullmen l mcssag~ that a_ppcals to lhcm is especially critical in a compctiti \'c
ruring market. Succcssf~I co~lparncs arc increasingly adapting their employer brands 10 1ar gct
different 1:irgeted rccrulls w11h . different values. needs. and ambitions.98 For example, ol der
workers' lifestyle goals often _di ffer from Ge neration Y's lifestyle goals, and highe r. achiev i ng
coUegc studen~ place greate r 1mp?nancc on interesting and challenging work than do other SIU·
dents,99 Stressing_ 1.hc mosl .ippcahng features of the job being recrui ted fo r should improve the
organization's ab1llly to aurac1 each suhgroup of po1cnt ial applicants. Recruiting brochures that
highlight how impo':ant_ ,_ca":~ork and divc_rsily arc to the finn can have , he cffcc1 of a1trac ling
more women and m1no n 11cs . S1ateme nts 1n a nc,Hpapc r ad abcmt company pol1c1es. sched ul-
ing flexibility, and a t~g~1cd 1 ~~ual o pportunity stateme nt ca n similarly innucncc older workers·
aitraetion to an organ 1zauo n. UK re1ailcr Tesco e xplicitly divides its potential fronthnc recruits into three segments:
those joining stra ight fro m ~c:1100 1, students looking for parH ime work , and graduates. A sc p a•
me section of the compa~6~s ~ cb s i_1c is devoted to each group and prese nts rccruiti~g matcr_i- als tailored to that group. - Oil SCr\'1ces company Schlumberger became one of the rndu:;t
ry s
leading recruiters of female engineers by introducing flex ible work practices a nd communicating
them during its recruitme nt c ffons. 103
Allhough the re arc rc lat i\'cly few studies on the best types of infonnation lo include i n a
recruiting message, taken as a whole the research sugscsts that rec ruiting matc ritils shou ld be
informative, address a range of job or organization characleristics. and pro\'idc specific in f or·
mation about those characteristi cs. 1°" Mo re detailed job postings have been found to be usefu l
in "weeding out" unqu alified arcplica n1s 1hrough sclf•sclcction, increasi ng th e efficiency o f the
recruitment nnd hiring prcx.·css. 05
DEVELOP YOUR SKILLS
Chapter 7 • Recruiting 189
How to D evelop an Empl oyer Brand?
A positive employer brand differentiates you as an employer An
employer b ra nd should capture the essence of w hat 1t 1s like to
work for your company and appeal to prospective employ~iis
Here are four steps in developing a pos1t1ve employer brand
values. culture, and image to appeal to potential appt1•
cants as well as current employees
1. Analyze the current percept ions of your target audience
Answering q uestions such as " Why should I want to work
for us? " or "Why are we d ifferent or unique as a place
to work? " can help you understand your strengths as an
employer and 1dent1fy the cha ractenSlics you want to play
up in your brand Because people often stay at an organi·
zat1on for the same reasons they Joined It m the first place,
understanding w hy employees stay can also help an rg•· nizat1on 1dent1fy its compet1t1ve advantage as an emp eyer
Afign your employer brand w11h your firm's pohC1es. pra~;
t1Ces. culture, and values Use aspects of the corporauon
Communicare your story clearly and consistently Generate
favorable publlc,ty such as news stones about your orga·
niza tion featured 1n various media Incorporate employer
brand elements into the firm's 10b advertisements an d I product packaging, and encourage emp loyees to spread
the b rand via word of mouth Consider sponsonng schol•
arsh1ps, events, or donating products or equipment t o
unrversit1es at whJCh you would like to ponray a str ong
employer b rand
4 Measure and Improve your branding effon by periodically
repeating step 1 to see whether peop le' s perceptions of the I company have changed Estabhshing metrics up front can
help you assess whether or not your efforts are working
190 Onprcr 7 • Rcmuons
-\f...o. :i...~ "'c mcnuoncd earher . pro"iding morr or less info
m1ation in the rccn, · .
~•· ~or Job hsung has oo:n found 1 0 have an elTecr on whelhcr
or no1 applicants 'llng Illes.
10 an orean,,..u on. 101 GencrJI od.s ihor includ
e limited job a11ribu1es hav e rhc POien( 1
"'•11 appJ}
• I I ( I" IS b I h
,a 10 ap
to • "ide ,,llfic1y of job appli canis and i;encrarc a o o ap
p ,can , u I ey also le nd . JlCaJ
lhc number of unqualified or inappropnalc applicants. Ad
s such as lhcse ca n also be 10
•0crt'l!c
. . . b h . unap,,.
. ,
ro job sc,ckcr> "'ho are highly focused ,n !heir JO scare s
1ra1cg1es. ..,,8
Information lh•t is pru1iculn rly unusuol or exll'Cme com
pared ro the other j ol, altc
rends 10 rm:hc crealer auenlion lhan a11nbu1es sc
r nearer ro average levels . 103 Pr ?1•11,,,
rcscan:b evidence -;.iso sugges ts lharjob seekers use a subs
et of the 101a] number of O '-""''"ill)•
. r, . . II rgan,z.,ti
or !ob char.lcrcrislies"' n_on c?".'pcnSlllory screening ac
tors. reJcc_t,~g a employm ent Op DnaJ
niues rhal do nor moe1 lhcir mmimum slandards on lhesc
charac1cnsucs, and arc wi ll ' Portu.
~-/Ts among olher ch11 r.1Cteristics. In panicufor, 511
/ary levds, 109 loca1ion, 11 0 ~~~
1 ~ "'al-,
Job1'' = common noncompcOS11lory screening ,·anables for whi ch other job and O
YP< or . .
rgan,zati
f.rrors cannot make up. Allh ough no JOb fac1or ,s a nonc
ompcnsa1ory screen ing va rj bl OOaJ
j°!' seekers. re~an:h has fo und lhal jobs lend 10 be reje
cle~ more frequ~ntly if lhe y f:il; for all
nun,mum n-qu1rcmcn1S on lh esc fac1ors regardless of 01h
er JOb characlenstics. 11 als o
O lll<er
some Job f.rtors, panicularl y high compenS11tion levels,
can offse1 less desirable fe aiu seems Iha,
and organiz.ition. For e>am ple, high compensation leve
ls have been found lo offse i ,t s of a Job
effect of employmen1-a1-w1 I I s1a1emenrs,
112 and having an explici1 EEO po licy has ~ ncgarn,
ro belp offset the ncg_aciv~ ef fect ~f applicatio~ q~cstion~
lhal could appear discrimin aia'" ~~nd
Pro>1d.ing spcc,tic 1nformauo n about a JOb s locauon, the 1
ype of job, and salary ,'Y:
recruiunenr maleriols can 511 ve organizations the lime and
expense of process ing an d e,cls "
C:llld.ida1es who arc ullima1 ely no1 likely 10 accep1 job
offers once they learn lhis i i scree~••g
Providing more infonnation and pro,•iding more speci
fic infonnation (e.g .. lhc ex" om,auon.
salary rather lhan ~competiti ve salary'") have been found
10 inOuence the decision 10 aci
1 sianmg
Oll!aruzati rr, I · • be th 'f •
app Y roan
_ on. . I IS 1mponan1 10 re".1em r al I some po
1en11ol applican1s are not li kely 10
ul .
_=rely accept Job offers or 10 silly w,lh lhe organ,zauon a
s long as the organi,aiion w o Id l'k
11
IS 001 neccss:irily a limiialio n for recruiting praclices 10 d
issuade lhese people from eve u i' c. ,r
Table 7-4 summarizes the pr actical implica1ions of recru
iunenl research findings. r rs r app Ying.
Developing Realistic Job Previews
When commu_nicating the n a1ure of lhe work and the or
gani2111ion, organiza1ion~ have a cho,c,
of how obJecuve 10 be. Som e organi2111ions embellish l
hc nalurc of the work and lh - · •· r
'4 0rking in 1h · · ak ' ·
e •=IIY o
. . e organ,zauon, m mg the Job seem far more
posi1ive and e njoyable lh an ii ncccs-
sariJy is. As ''° have menuoned, research has fo und lha1 slan1ing recrui1in
g informaiion can b,
■HaiJjj Practical Implications of Recruitin g Research Findings 116
The fo_llow,:g is a summary of lhe practical steps firms s
hould take to improve 1hei r
reau,tmg errorts:
• ~'':' ~Cl\Jfi 11~rs who are personable, inf
ormative, and lrustworthy.
a. e a inns 1mnal recru111ng a ct,v 1 (b h
, ,th) ' •es roe ures, on-campus r
ecruiting effons and so
p° /s attral ct,ve to cand1da1es as lhe firm 's la1er recruiting activities
,
rov1 e app ,canls wilh enoug h accura1 . i b
.
1ha1 they can assess their fit. e ,n ormai,on a out the job
and organ,zat,on so
• Ensure lha1 all !he firm's c ommun1cati
.
image and attractiveness a I ons send a pos,uve messag
e about 1he company's
P s an emp eye,
• rov1de clear, specific, and com le1e ' i . .
.
prevent candidaies from k P n ormai,on •n recr
u,1ment materials and mes sages 10
C ma mg erroneous inferences
reate a pos,twe organ,zat,on al ima .
the reC1\J11ing effort. ge in lhe minds of applican
ts, both before and dunng
• ;espond dq u,ckly lo appl1 ca11ons and inquiries
rea1 can ,da1es fairly and co nsiderate! h .
Enhance applicants' percep1 o f' y I roughout ihe
recruiting process.
s f , ns o ,a,rness tra n .
,
• ect,on procedures keep ca d'd • ' recru,te
rs to explain the company s
Co . ' n , ates informed d
'd
mmunica1e values of lhe I h , an avo, c
ommunication delays.
...rnnienial 10 an orguni,ario n. 11 7 Pan,cularl .
.., • 1h · b · Y '" a strong J ho
CS exist if e JO ,s nor wha1 lhey expected
•. a r marker "hen o 1h . b .
U • •
, conned" 1 er JO opponuni-
.,,d leave lhc organ1za11on. A 2012 survey of 2 300
cmp oyccs arc likely 10 pc ~ I
... ,reniploycr choice and 88 pc1wnr were look· , new
hires fo und tha1 51 r on n poor y
uJl, . . ·mg to mak
percent regretted
th•I ,he hinng proccs~ did no 1 realistically or accurnr I d
e a change. Their chief comp laint was
()thcr organ,w uons op1 10 d i sc lose 10 a 1
. c Y cscnbc the job I rs PP ,eanis as r, I . ·
as""«,ble 10 reduce lhe chan ce thai lhe applicants 11
11 _e po1cn11ally undesirable ,nfo nnai
.,.,- 1h 'f h . . w, lose IOI •
,on
.. nr~ly ar' r e orgamza 11on told applicants h .
crest ,n rhc position. The fce h ng .
r • b n,· , " ar II wa,, real! l'k
,s
not wanl lhc JO . IS ,ocus o n getting candida1
y ' e ro work !here lhey wo uld
, h th . es 1o accep1 · b f ' .
•
undcrsiandmg w ar cy arc gerrmg themselves .
Jo o ,crs w1thour their thor oughly
• d . · 1010 can be •
.
J,elpcand1da1cs un ers1and th e organllation and 'ob C
_misguided. 01hcr companies 1ry 10
81/!'CI (hnp://can:crs.crackcrb arrcl.con,) ha,c PJI .. omp
anics, hke rhe res1auran1 chain Cracker
. 1· h . ' u m1ernc1,.·e fear
.
patcnual •PP ,canls lo I c ir cu llure and give the . . .
ures on rhc,r Web s11cs roexp osc
Realistic job previews (RJ Ps) involve ; in sight Int~ wh
at iris like ro work 1hcrc.
nrgative infonna1ion 10 job candida1es. Rather the presen
iar,on of bo1h posi1ivc and p otentially
by presenting lhe job oppon uni1y in the mosr pos:~~rr
ti, lo sell 1_hc_m on the job and company
cnr an hones! and acc ura1c p iclure. g
· reahsoc Job previews stri ve 1o pres-
The mosl common mistake made when initiall d
. . .
,s a 1endency lo emphasize o nly 1hc po reniially neg 1
.Y ~velop,ng a reah st,c recr ui ting message
. a 1vc ,carures of · b 11
,s nOI IO prcsenl a ncga11 ve pic1urc but 10 present 1
. . . a Jo · le purpose , however,
· · · a rea ""' ptcrurc of 1h · b
·
porenuolly pos,uve and po1 cn1inlly negative aspects .
ob' . e JO . prescn ung both
Prospcc1iv e applicants 10 self-selcc1
inlo or oul of '" ~d !CCl l\'e • way as poss ible 10 allow
. cons1 cr.u1on for lh · ·
a11ribu1es of a Job are, by n a1ure. objeclive, and an
sitiv . c posu,on. Aspects and
should be left 10 the applican t For example. rather r~a':s,
aii:,::ietu_vc 1n1c~rera1ion of rhem
municating lba1 1hc organiz. 11ion is particularly seek'
d \ . he Job IS high pres sure. com-
ume urgency would be mor e appropria lc. ,n
g eta, ·oncnied people wit h a sense of
There is no such thing as a " 'bad job," only a bad · b ,
· .. .
h · •
JO ,or a pan,cular 1nd1v1du al 01vcn his
or er 1n1ercsls, compc1enc 1es, and values Presenting
b' • . , . 0
d I . I If .
. o icc1ove m,orm ar,on about a posi1ion
an em ng peop e sc -selec 1 inlo i1 knowing wha1 1he Jo
b wi ll rea l I L . I 'k h 1 .
,L. · h · b d · · .
Y "" 1 c c ps get them 1n10
""' ng I JO s an increases lhe hkchhood tha1 once cmp
lO)'cd lh II , · •
-r. II · ey "'' slay 1n !hose Jobs a
nd
.,.. .. o'."' we . The goa~ 1s n oi ro dc1cr candida1es by fo
cusing on fociors lhn r mi hr be rcei ,·e<l
negau ~ely, bul _10 pro_v,de ac ~uralc 1nform?ri?n about 1h
e job and organi,aiion. rf9 1B M\ career,,
Web sue hii_s highly in_1ernc 11vc mull,mcd,a mcluding
"day in rhc r,rc·· videos, Di , live char
busrness-un,1 specific 1n fon na1 ion, and nash video.
120 Some companies ev gg ·d 1
- •
,·idco lours of !heir faci li1ic s .
en prov, c on me
U a c~m'."on reason for emplo yees leaving the organization
is tha1 the job isn ·1 what lh ey
upec1cd, lh•~ 1s a good sig n 1ha1 the recruiting messag
e could be improved. Finns that experi-
ence such a s11ua11on c an or ten use an RJP 10 1ry 10 red
uce 1heir turnover ralcs
_John Wanous.'2 1
a professor of managemen l and human resources, h,;.
idcn1ified three
funcuons Iba! are se rved by an RJP:
1. St/f-stltclion: Giving ap plicanis a more balanced pic
1ure of1he job and organizat ion allows
lhem lo opl ou1 of the appl ication process if lhe oppon
unity is not a good march fo r them.
RJPs do not necessarily m ake large numbers of appli
cants more likely 10 drop o u1 of the
application process, and 1h e applicanls likely lo be Josi
after communica1ing realis tic infor-
mation abou1 lhe job and c ompany are no1 likely 10 ha
,•e been successful hires any way. m
2. Vaccina1um: RJPs may work by "vaccinating" em
ployees" expcc1ations and allowing
lhcm 10 develop copi ng m echanisms 10 deal wilh unp
lcasan1 or uncxpec1ed aspcc 1s of the
position. When cncounler ing 1hcse aspccls on rhe job
, 1he employee is prepared for them
and is less ncga1ively affec 1ed by l11em.
3. A commi1me111 lo /Ire cf roice: If e mployees are in
fom,ed abou1 1he negati ve aspects of
a j ob before 1hey acccpl employmcnl, 1hcy can no1
claim 11131 lhey did not kn ow about
lhem. 123 Thus, 1hey may be more co
mmiucd 10 1he choice 1hey have made-tha1 is. rhcy
may be more inclined 10 slay in 1heir posilions because !
hey realize 1hey willingly a ccep1cd
lhe job despilc knowing i1 s realities. '
2'
appl1can1. irm t at are cons,sten1 with
the values and need s o f e ach When the Swedish home
furni shings company /KEA en lcred 1hc U.S. marke1.
many
new hires qui1 aflcr a few monlhs due lo 1hc differen
ce be1wccn IKEA ·s values a nd lhe 1ypical
Chapter 7 • Rccru i1ing 191
REAUST/C JOB PREV IEWS (RJPSJ
pr0\1dr bo11t /HJJlfllt wuJ fHlll'llllally
nr,;a11, r 111fomiurw11 lu Jo b rond1dor,s
192 C'h.J.r(a - • RC\.-rwon,g
c.x :-ctat1o ns o f U.S. cmplo)C'C>. One orlhe issues w as thal IKEA: val ues eq ua lity and docs n .
e,:,:, 0
·cc:s ob utlcs or clear JOb de.scnpuons. To reduce the h igh turno ver rate , IKEA c Otg1\c
,u ~ 1.~1unJg ),tr,11egy from o ne focused on hiring the b est qualified pco ~lc to c rnphas1ZJ~gcd
co mpanv ·), \a,lucs and providing RIPS to let poor fits s clf•sclcct o u~.,;lu s successfull y log ~
rumo,e; rates and helped IKEA open ~verul su~cc.ss ful _ ~ .S . s tores . - Apple's \ Veb ~lie ; clld
IL dear that it IS lookrng for h:u,J\, o rkmg. comm1t1 cd md1v1duals wn h a s trong a u cn11 on lo d ~ t\
c,~o S) stcms' Make Fncnds @ C & o program use~ cmploy_cc volunteers lo answer Pho e1ai1
c•mwl qucncs from Job seekers who would hkc more m fom,a~on a~~t working at Cisco I)( or
G1vmg applicants the o pponunity to sc l~•sclcct o u t o! the lu~ng p rocess if the)' do
p:rcea\c themselves to be good fits with the pos 1u o n or or ganrzauon inc reases the li~elih not
the applicants uhmtately hm ... ~ will be good fits and will be ben~r employee s as 3 resuJ~ th.i!
the rcla U\Cly lo w cost associated Y.1lh the d~vclop ment o f an ~P. they may be useful for o,rv:n
niaLao n.s try mg to red uce tu mover rates for Jobs w hich depart.mg cmplo) ecs say were not v.t;
they cxpcc1C'd y. hen they accepted job o ffe rs. .
S o me companies have used RJ~s to c o u~tc r m_ac curatc cmplo~•c r _,~ages. Fast food gian,
M c Do nald" s has rcsponJed 10 cnllcs in Lhe United K ingdom w h o claim ll tS a poor Cntpl
fau nchin o 3 poster campa.ig n using the slogan --N ot bad ror a McJob," >whic h deta ils the ~! crfiby
■ . th . --~
and ncx1blc hours the c omP3ny offers. It 1s th~ first L~mc c company h as tne d 10 combai lhc
neg auve mi)Conccplion s that have been associat ed with the title " McJo b" ever s ince the 1
was used by Douglas Copeland in tus bcs t•.sel ling n ove l Ge11e"'!tio11 X: Tales f or"" Accele-,:;:
Culture. A l\kDonaJd' s execuuvc bc lie,·es that a hu ge gap exis ts between the extern al PC:rcc
Lio n and the internal reality of workrng at McDonal d ' s and st.ates. ·•Our e mployer reputation is~
J ustified: y.e have to accept that this association c x1st.s and correct it: -1
26 n 1
C o mm unicating a realistic picture of the job docs no t have to be expens ive o r difficul
The focus 1s not o n aspects of the Y.Ork that are already .visible. o r o b v ious . to .:i.pplicants. bu~
o n aspects o f the work not likely to be known by a n o u tsider- say. the fas t pace of wo rk. high
perfo m mncc expec tations, pay , and benefits. The process of c o mpiling infonna1 ion about thc ,ob
o r organiatio n that c.and1d.:i.1cs will find mo re and less attractive begins wiLh unUcrstanding what
the firm "s c urrent empl o yees lake and d1s hke about the job. Surveying them m ig l11 indicate th:it
they like. say , the .:i.bovc•averagc pay, rclati\cly low cducationaJ requirements . generous benefits
and the fac t that they are done with work by 2 p. m ., w hi ch allows the m time to spend w ith thci;
farru lies o r to work at .second jobs. lnfom1a uon c ollcc1cd fro m e mployee s who recentl y n:si~ncd
can help a firm undcrstnnd what they dtd and d i dn ' t like. All th is in fo rmatio n ca n the n be syn-
thes ized into a rca.Jis tic rcc ruiung message that is not so lengthy that it overwhe lm); applicants.
Of course . the best thing to do with a j o b that h as p otential ly undesirable c haracteristics 1s
to take the necessary steps 10 improve 11 before recruiting cand idates. Perhaps poo r s upervisors
can be tr:une d . pay and benefit leve ls can be raised . or s afety and worki ng c o ndi t ions can tx
impro ved. In o ther words, providing rcal1~tic job infom,ation about a bad joh is no s ubstitute for
providing a bcncr, more appealing j o b opponunity.
Developing Self-Assessment Tools
In add ition 10 trying 10 recru it candidates wi th a particular p ro file o f c hnra c tcri st ics , orgam•
,.au o n_s c~n taJ..e .steps to make it eas ier for app hcants 10 se)f. as scs s their fit wilh the job and
o rg_a~1za11o n. Bc ca u~ believing Lhat they arc a good fit w ith a compan y ' s c u lture and j ob o ppor·
tunn ies t~proves a Job ~eekcr· s a llraction to the org an ization , many org a ni1ati o n.s try to enable
appli cants self.evaluauo n of their fit with the c o mpany . Companies inc luding M c Donald's,
\ Valmart. a nd Ho me Depot provide in fom1aL1 o n abo ut the o rgani zation 's culture a nd values and
have crea1eU in1erac1ive sc lf•asscssment tools to he lp candidates ~akc this asse ssment.
So me organ i,.atio ns provide .:in online questionn aire that gives us ers feedback about thclf
degrc~. of fit "ith_ the j ob and o rganiza tion. 127 ZipRccruitc r and B right. com o ffer a "Bright
Score feaiurc g iving P~tc ntial job applicants an instan t score of their fit w ith a c o mpany 's job
d~scnpti o n b~d on the ir work experienc e, skil ls, a nd education.12s Prospect ive e mployees can
~ so use on-sn~ c o ~pui crs to learn about a.n o rgan ization a nd its j ob opportun ities , take sclf-
a~~e ssrn~nts 10 idc~ufy lh~1r fit wi th the comp an y' s c u lture. read job desc ripti o n s , review currcn
l
Jo openings , a nd 1mmcd1ately app ly fo r j o bs.
T o ensure an ho ne st sc i r s hould be ano n mou -~ scss mcni o n the par
t of the potential applicant. s cJf.asscssmenlS
Y s . M orco,cr, tJ, e company sho uld not use this in forma t ion to ~ rccn
!TOr
,pPhcanis. Toe bes t use of suc h _a tool is to help po tential a lie
y is a place whc~ the y a.re likely to enjoy working. If ~ p ant~ de1enn1nc \lihether the co rn-
~ paor (i t and d~c 1dc~ not to ~pply, she and the o rganiia:te nll al ~ppt i:ant perceives he r~ctr
:i pun;ui ng " 'h at 1s ult11natcl y like ly to be a poor match. · n can save 11me and reso urces by
TIM ING THE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
ncr the lirm has idcnufied the mo re• and \css•a lt.raclh·e as A de(1sion needs to be made about when to eommun1cat lh_p
e_ct; o f the JOb and ihc o rg an i1.a1ion,
1 t of the rec ruit.i ng message is likely 10 change ove r ,e is ;n ormauo n to apphcanlS. 11\C co n•
" " h IS the i' ob tille. the gener:11 nature and respo b •l~c. ocusing initi.:i.lly o n broader issuc,i;,,
sue ns1 1 1t 1cs o f the j ob d h · b' 1
Al the in itial stage of making co ntact with u pmcntial rec ru·1 h . an_ t _ e J~ _s oca11o n.
h 10 q · ckl d n .
1 · t c commu mcatto n 1s m1endcd 10
a]loW cac. party u~ . Yan .. COSl•c ecu~cly a..,scss t he general like lihood o f a fit betwee n 1hc
applicant s ~o~pctenc acs , valu~s. ao d cxpcnences and the orgnn11a1ion' s partic ular o b o n
in s
If the orgam zau o n has an opening for an accoun1.:i.nt but the potent· al r ha J r g .
tod an in1crest in marketi ng. the recruiting c ffon is no t likely 10 be
I appdi~n~ ~ a b~c grou
nd
As the fit between the rcc ruil and the Job begins lo loopkursbcuc,, ur_1 ~r y cnherhpart~ .
. • · d . . e r , m,onnauo n I at 1s
more detailed ,s pr~vide about thc Job s rc~uirements, responsibil ities, autho rity leve
l. and
a(lvanccmen~ potcnual. J ob can~~dai~s ~ e lypically inter ested in learning all 1he)' can about the
organizatio n s s trategy and ~s n10n m _,ts market . the firm"s a\'nilab lc training programs, trave l
requirements , and the stability o f the JOb and co mpany. Candidates may also be inte rcs1cd m
learning what they can about t~c organ,_zatio n' s ,·a lues andeulturc, and the rec ruitment message!'!.
from the company c an_ be ~c signed to mf~nn the ca ndidate about these issues bo1h directly and
indirectly. Compe ns ation issue s ca n he d iscussed a t any time but arc o flen reserved for la te in
the recruitment and hiring process. Figure 7•2 summ arizes the type or infonnation candid.:i.tes
generally look for earlier versus later in the recrui ting process.
We have disc u ssed how applicants interpret recr uitment experience s. including perceived
recrui ter competence and recruitment de lays, as sym bolic of brooder o r gan11.atio nal charac ter•
isues. An o rganization that docs not keep its word regarding when it will he commumc ating
with applicants or whose inten•icwers arc unprepared a nd overschcdulcd is sending a d iffe rent
message to recruits than a n organi1a11o n that is o r ganized, professional, a nd keep), its word in its
interactions with job candidates . It is imponant that recru ners be tr:uncd in Y.hat to tell recruits
and how to identify issu es of imponancc to eac h ca ndida1e. Some candidates will be foc used
on the organization ' s com pen satio n and incentive s ystem. while others will attend more to the
opponu nitics for training a nd dc,·clopment and job ad\'ancemcnt. It is difficult 10 anticipate
all the issues cand idates may want to hcnr about. Pro viding a communication channel through
which condidates can learn m o re in fo rmation and ask questio ns, perhaps via a We b site o r phone
number, can help balance 1hc n eed 10 provide en oug h informa1ion with the need to not provide
too much informa tio n , w h ich cun be both expensive ond generally unnece ssary at the early stage
of the recruiting proce ss.
Earlier in the rccnutmg process
FIGURE 7 -2
La1cr m the rccnmmg prOCC'iS
Job offe r details and company bcncfiu
More detailed mfonnauon aboul the Job' s requirements, rtspons1b1\1t1cs.
authority lc\·cl, ad,anccmcnt po1cn11:1I.JOb
and compat1)' stab1ht)', and lhc rirm·s ,·ah.Ki ll!ld culture
tnfonn::mon about the candidate 's potcn11al Iii \\tlh lhc JOb du ties
and comJ):lfl)
Orond infonnnuon iiboul the JOb and romplO)
1nformatlon Sought at Different Times in the Recruit ing Process
Chapter 7 • Rccruiung 193
194 OupiN 7 • R(\..TU1t1ng
IIECJlt·m., 'G GLW£
ACHIEVING RECRUITMENT CONSISTE NCY
Rt'XTUiuncnl .1t.·1ivities Jay the fou ndation for~ .consis.1cndy adminis~cred, cfticicnr, and le
dcfrnsibk staffing elTon. Developing_ a recr uru~g g urdc and following the EEOc·s bc<t galiJ
Li1..--es n:larcd 10 tt-Cruiu ng are part of this found a11on.
Prac,.
Dev.loping • Recruiting Guide
A rttrujling gwde is a fonnal document 1ha1 d e rails rhe process to be followed wh
o fa,,,.,/d,,nuw-,,ud>nu,ls,J,,,
r,rrrcu 1a b.- fi.Jlo-vd•llim11jin.
f"r'rr.J:, joratJ lf'"~
recruits for an open position. 11 should address bolh inrcmal :md cxrcmal recruiting en a
firm
A m:ruillilcnt g uide clarifies compony poli cies and procedures relating to the budg:.
roc""<,.
ties. tim~Jincs. sraff members ~sponsible for recruiting. legal issues. a nd lhc s pecific st s,
ac-1z,,,.
mken lo fill positions. By srandardizrng the recruiti ng procedures used by the organi,a
:r ' 0 be
g uide hdps clarify which employees are cxp cc red 10 pcrfonn wh at roles during the rec
on, th,
I . . r . d ni11mc111
process and helps 10 ens ure thaJ all rho re cv anl recruu rng po rcres an procedures are t 11
during the process. This can help the organiz ation recru it in the most effecti ve, legal mao
owed
derailing "hat is and is nOI acceptable recruiting beh avior. The p olicies and procedures d/"e.r by
in the g uide also help coordfoare the cffons o f a finn's inrem al and c x1ernal rec ruiters 10 SC
nbcd
lhey are nor ar cross-purposes with one an oth er.
ensurt
Following the EEOC's Best Recruiting P ractices
As we discussed in Chapter 3. m~y legal iss ues :ire involved in recru iting and stafling. Table 7.5
summanzcs an EEOC rask forces best p ractice ideas in the area o frccrui1mcnt.
129
•{j:j•ff j EEOC Best Recruiting Practices Firms actrng consistently with EEOC best
practices do t he following; 130
• E~blish a policy for recruiting and hiring, incl uding the c riteria , procedures, respons,b
/e
1nd,v1dua/s, and appl1cabtl1ty of drvers1ty a nd affirma tive act·ron initiatives.
• Engage in short-term and long-term st rategic planning.
• Identify the appl,cable bamers to equal e mployment opportun;ty.
• Specify Ule firm 's recruiting goals.
• Make a road map for implementing the p lan.
• Ensure that there is a communication netw ork that can be used to notify in terested pe
rsons
about the fimi's job opporn mit1es. The commun rcatron network shou ld include advert,s,ng
within the organtzat,on, within the genera/ m edia, and med,a that focus on minorities
people wtth disab1lit1es, older people, and w omen.
•
• Communicate the competencies, skills, a nd ab1l1ties required for available positions.
• Communicate about fam,Jy. fnendly and w ork.friendly p rograms.
• Where transportation is a n issue, conside r a rrangements with the local transit auth
onty,
PartJC1pate in career and job fa,rs and open hou ses.
Werle w,th professiona l assoc,a tions, civic associations, a nd educatio nal 1nst1tur1on
s to
atuact m ,nom,es, women, people with d 1sab ,l1ties, and/or older people.
• Prov,de recn.uters. employees, and search firms with inst ructions to recruit d iverse
candidate poofs and e,cpand the company's search networks
• Partner with organizations d e d icated to se rving d iverse group. s.
Use mtemsh,ps work-stud c d h 1
intere sted and 9uaflf1ed ca~d1~~~~;.an sc o arsh1p programs to attract and pursue
Develop and support educaf I b
institutions tha t can rov,de ~na program s; ecome more involved with educationa
l
talent pool. p t e company with leads used to recruit a more di verse
En sure that personnel ,nvolved I h .
of th e ir equal employ n t e recr uiting and hiring process are well traine
d in terms
Become more mvol ::;enthopportuntty resp onsib,1,t,es.
d iverse candidates v in 1
e community to improve the company's ima ge and attract
• El1m,nate p ractices that e xclude d Evaluate the firm·s manage ~verse c
a nd1dates or crea te barriers for t h e m .
employment opportunity 9 ::~~ l e progress they make toward the com
pany's equal
-
Sodaf Me dia Recruiting at United Pa 1 • rce service
To t,eetcr otilize s~ial m~i~ .in iu rtcruiting efro ns. UPS ere
center of irs rccnuung acuv1t1es. The videos it po sted aied a c_arccr'i W<:b site 1hat became the
\,je~·cd by over I mi llion people in one month duri ng a ::te ~Veb
51_1~ profiling different Jobs "'ere
driving traffic to its careers si1e through prini ads as :ell a:ohda~ hinng scason.
131 UPS lhcn began
it,oo&h drivers and package handler.. '-'Crc lhc lar gei d. m_obi/e apps and tex t messaging. Even
utilize this tech nology when job seeking and learni ng a:O't~~ 11\t35 clear that they '-'ere willing to
To cvaJuntc the effectiveness of social media as . :
people clicked fro m social media to an "apply no w" 1~~•ting
source. UPS measured how many
hOW many finished one, how many " ere iniervie" 'cd a d,~g page, how m~y staned an application.
('00\'Crsion ratio of created applications to hires from f ac:OO:t mlny ~·ere hired. ~PS fo und th:u the
onlinc ,nedja. The interview lo hire ratio or 2:1 als o indicarcd th andhTwmc.r "ere t w1~c that or a11 othe
r
way was very good. IJJ 31 1 c quuli1y or apphcunts sourced 1his
, u:5's rccn11ting budget r h~ng('d from 90. ~rrc.nt in print media in 2005 lo 97 percent in social
media in 20_10. UPSJobs on Facebook. conuunt ngJob listing and links as we ll as 3 variety or video
s
and fnte~uvc content, has ,over. 55,000 likes. The c omJ)Jny al.so uses Twiuer 10 prm idc imcrcstin
informauon on the company s ph,lamhropic work or 01hcr topics.'''
g
UPS now has a staff th.al mterJcts wi1h candid ates \'ia Twiner and Faccbook. and has also
de,·cloped a calendar for postJ~g u~tcs to ~~I infom ution out wiihout oveNhelming fo llo'4crs.' J6
When UPS began o fonnal social media rccnutmg strategy in 2009. only about 100 people "'ere hired
through the effort. In 201.2. the number or hirc.s through its social media rttruitmcni cffort.s reache
d
at,oul 6,000, and subslanll~lly lo"cred the overal l cost per hire. in Hiri ng speed and quali ty has als
o
Improved, and the con version ra1e of applications 10 hires fro m Faccbook and Twiucr arc higher tha
n
rrom other sourccs. 118
To reinforce their employe r brand and 10 fin d rhe best matches for their cu lture and busi•
ness, the company also built an on line applica Lion 1h:u includes questions asking job cand ida
tes
10 revcaJ their favori te Conraincr Store produ c1 and additional que stions designed to delve
into
their comm un ications ski lls and o ther characte ristics. Using the Web sir e also helps the can
di-
dale I= more about the compony and beue r prepare for a possible inrcrview. 'They're no
r j ust
wandering into the store and till ing out a n application," the company's director of recru
iung
and training says. ' They arc taki ng 45 minu tes or so to prove their interest. h has height
ened
the quality o f the ca nd idates." 1110 store ma naJers, in tum, arc able to quickly respond 1
0 each
applicant wilh a lelle r tailored to the sil uttlion .1 9 This strategy he lps to persuade candidates
that
!he company is a good Iii for their interests and needs .
Summary
Chap1er 7 • Recnutrng 195
The purpose of recru itment is 10 genernte and maintain the inter-
est of desirable polen tial employees. An org anization's recruit·
mcnt messages, how ii ha nd les its recruiti ng process, and the
behaviors o f its recrui1ers can all inOuencc its current and future
hiring effec1iveness and have spi llover effe cts as well. Trealing
potential applicanlS a nd employees as pote ntial customers can
enhance organi1.a1ional hiring success as w ell as organizational
perfonnance.
each recruiter' s strengths and limi1a1ions. Th is knowledge can
be used in making recruiting assignmcnlS a nd identify tmin•
ing and developmen t opponunitics that can im prove internal
recrui ters' effectiveness over time. Because all rhc recruiting
metrics can be collected and processed ccntr:1 lly. using interna l
recruiters can a lso facilitate recrui tment eval u ation.
The ques rion of who should recruit for a p anicular posr•
lion is not one to be raken lightly as the choice affeclS rhe
speed and q uality of the staffing ini tiative. The lirsl decision an
organizarion needs to make with regard to who should rec_ru,t
is whether rhe rcc ruircr should be intern al or the organrza·
tion should ou1sou rcc its recruiting activit.ics an d use external
recruiters. The fac l 1hal inrernal rcc ruirers generally do more
hiring for an o rgan ization 1han do ex terna l recrui rers ca_n also
mean tha1 more in fo rm ation is available to rhe organr zauon on
As discussed earlier, Lhc recrui tment infonn ation com-
municated by the organization and ils recru iters must be per•
ccivcd as credible if it is to innucnce ap plican t attraction.
Perhaps ensuring the c rcdihility of 1he recr uiti ng information
rccei ved is why applicants have been foun d to generally pre•
fer meeting with multiple organi zational repr esentatives durin.g
the recruitme nt proccss. 140 Some research has fo und that applt-
cants pe rceive job incumbents to be more lik eable. knowledge-
able, and trus tworthy sources or job infom 1ation Lha~ formal
rccruilcrs. Applica nts also report themselv es more likely to
consider accepting a job offer,, hen the in rom 1atio n source was
-
196 Clur<o- . • R('\"rulltl\!'
!lll 111,.imt, .-n1 r:uhcr lh.in a n,-ru11er. " 1 The pcrccl\cJ s1a1us of lhc f"I"-"' do111;: lhc n,-ru,un~ ma) oJso 111nuencc applicant rc.;,.;oon.-. On.: >1uJ~ found that Job utlc ,nnu.:nr..-d pen'Cpuons oi 101(':f'\l(\\Cf 1."'0ffiJ"'l((l',."(.' ,uch that \\ hen the IRlCC"\iC\I.Cr \\ Q..\ IIIUNU,-o.l onl~ ~) OJJTIC , apphC!llll 1mpn:.s1on., \\CIT ic,s ra,or• :iblc lhJn "hen the uric ··n'Cn u un~ d1rcc1or"' " JS 3ho ll-'Cd.
142
Unronun.lld~. "h) some ;;_-cru11cr.. ou1pcrfom1 other... nnJ r,en uho .1n ~-;in1zatmo·s be-st rocnute-rs are, are quc.suons romp,liucs do not Olten a.l Organtznuons can sclccl and u-:un l\'\""Tlllta,; JUSI llS elTccU><I) a., th<) C!lll sclcct and lr:lin p..-oplc
Takeaway Points
I. R=u,ung helps l firm build 3 sllhl< :ind LJlentcd group of anplo)('C) ,.bo ronltlbure 10 its n11'-'i1on and b~1ncss i.tr.urgy R=uucn do so by ron-<rung the lcods generated dunng sourcing 1010 Job arphc:uns. gcocrauns mtm~I m the comp:in) and HS Job~. Jn.:1 f'C1"l'lJ,ng c:indid:llc, 10 OCC<pt mended job offm
1. Rrcnutment sp1llOH'1' ctTCCIS an: lhc effects of rrcru,ung 1h:1t go bc:)roJ LI>< !"l"'CUl:u sufling effon. When an unhappy Job e:ind1 - cb:r IClJs pou::ruul customers or Job •pphc:in15 aboul • bld n,cnul• ID£ c.t~ u C3n h.J,c Jn cff«1 on ho\\ Jnrxtcd 10 lhe firm f= 3pph C1111S ,.,IJ be. the 011an1L:ll1ons paform:incc. and the
Discussion Questions
1. \\n) u It 1mporuru Lh3J. organ11Juons conunue 10 actn e ly recmu JOO c:mJJd.ltcs c,cn after they ha1e applied'
.!. If ~ou "~tal 10 rcque'St fundang 1rom ) Our CEO to c, alu31e 11nd 1mpro,, the quiln) of JOUr company's recruiters. how "ould )OU pcr<u:,de him or her tluJ doing so " ould be a good 1nvcsuncn1°
J. \\'Jul =-ru11erchlr.lcten.ucs mo11,r 10 )OU "hen )OU arupply1ng for ,job? \\11) • l\luch do nor mailer much or 31 all' Why nor?
Exercises
1. S1rc1rg_, £.ums~ Lu,ury Limou.sinc is 3 thriving business that operates a limousine sen 1cc in 3 large metropolitan area of o, er 800.000 people. Cuslllmm ,::,JI 2~ hours in advance 10 schedule• hm, a nr and dm ,r for anything from ndcs 10 ond from 1he airpon 10 fun n1ghts on lhe to"n. Because Lu,uf) Limousine's dn\Cfl arc the only cmplo)cc,, "ho cu<1omm sec facc-10-facc. they mu<t be profes>1onal. be lno•lcdgclble •bout 1hc cit) 's rood.I and fastest routes 10 key locations. and represent the comp:iny • ell. LJ1cly. the company's "help • anted"' o,hcmscmenl5 in the local paper h:11en'1 bctn a.ttracllng the number of quality dri,crs ii needs. In response to this situation. Lu.AUi) Limousine has decided 10 con- duct a mass nwlmg C3mp3.ign and send a rccruitm~nt brochure 10 coch horn< m the meuopohl:in area. The company hopes 1his will impro,c ll5 Jb1 ht) to rcmut quJIII) drl\crs
The follo-. mg Job rcquiremcnl5 :ind rt\\asds em1 for the dn,er·s Job Dmcrs must Jal be 01,r 21 )cors of age. (b) poss a •nllrn ttsl about local roads and high•ais, (cJ possess a 1Jl1d com- 1ncrc1al dm o-'s license. (d) h:l,e a good dmmg record (no mo1ing ,iol:uions in the la.st thrtt )em J. (e/ be 3blc 10 read mop,. :ind (f) be cuuneous r--:o prr\ ious limou sine cJ.mmg experience is required Tiic JOb is p:111 time. 1at)1ng bet• ccn 10 oud 35 hour, po-week. The
folhng other posiuons. 1l1us: the failure of r,0115 10 be their n-cru11crs' sktll, and disseminarc rccruiung be nctm,'-\ ., easy 10 n-cufy Bccau,c apphcanrs often ,nrcrp
51 Pl"ac11ct,
char.icrensucs and bch3' 1ors as signals of broader rbei rccn.,~, . . JO OO(j
mzauonal chJr:1Ctensucs. II " 1mponant that lhoughi be org1. 10 the sclccuon of rccru11ers. Organ1za11ons should g"•n rc"ard and provide fcedb:ic k 10 rccruircrs 10 ,n .. also lllJn
' , , ~xin11l ' effccuvcncss in aurJcUng desired apphcanis. lmplem c llicu
• en1ing apphcanr auracuon st1111cg1c~ and ~cvclopi ng a rccru,un &~ will also enhance a company s ab1h1y lo meet 115 rccru . g &U1<Jr
111ng goai,
company's 3b1ht) lo rttru11 the unhapp) job candidate 1 posiuon and do business " 1Lh 1hc candid:11c or a fu11.1rc
J . R«runm should_be person~blc._informa'.ive. and 1ru>1• onh .i. Applicant ,:mracuon strategics include 1mpro\ mg an or )
uon's image 311d its brand as an employer. and 1hc nature ganJJi. and timing of the inform1:uion prcscnrcd 10 rC'c.-ruus . · rtalisrn,
s. Developing a recrui1mcn1 guide and folio" ing the EEOC·, br rccnuung praruccs can help a company administer its rccru st
acu, 11ies more eon,.;1en1ly and legally by formal11ing lhe 11 1""'Q
:ind practices 10 be follo•ed during recru1uncm po ,a.,
- 4. Does an ?rganilltion's image or iis br:ind as an employer nlfra
1t.s tUtracuvcness 10 you as an employee or a potential cmplO)rt" Whal ekmcn1s of its brand mauer 1hc most to ) nu,, Why?
S. Whal could • r«rull<r do 10 in1crcs1 you in applyi ng for I com, pany )OU have never hc:ud of before? Whal 1ae1ic, or ,nfomwioo might pcrsu3dc )OU lo npply?
drfring can occur 24 hours a dly. sc,cn dl) ~ a \\ Cfk The "age 1s SI 0.00 per hour plus ups. Tips arc highly variahlc: about 15 pr1r1111 of cus10111Cr, provide no tips. 50 percent prmrde lip< of ohoo1 I0prr· cent. and 35 percent pro1 ide tips of 15 percent or mon:. Drhen m gfrcn thrcc da}S of 1r:iining by an experienced dmer. afltr • hich they mull poss a ndc-along tcsl conducted b) 1hc owner ol Luxury Limousmc. Drhcrs rccchc a paid onc-\\ cd. , acation afltf I.In) hour.; o( \\ Ork in a 52-"cek period. Another hcncfil I! ll1,t drivm often hear of orher job opponunitics from rhcir cu,romrD Anyone could be a cusiomcr. from celebrities 10 high school prom dates Traffic accidents and bn:akdo• ,is can occur. :ind uamc can be challenging. Although most cus1onicrs arc friendly nnd enjoi1hl~ SOIIIC become intoxicated and cnn be difficult 10 dcJI " ith.
Prepare i. o ver,ions of the recruiting brochure. The fir>t should carry a reali11ic message. and the second a uadiuon•I mes· sage. The brochu,c will be a single. 81/2" by 11 " piece of pap.~ folded in half. with one of the outside halves being used forthc mJJI· ing and n:1um 3ddrcsscs. Your goal is 10 auract safe dri1Crs • hO "'U execute Lux ury Limousine's strategy of providing reliable, high· qualuy 1r:in,pona1ion :ind excellent customer service. Rcnicmb:r, 1hc goal is to communic:uc a realistic message. nol a negnihc one.
'fh<n, prepare • scp>rnte n,pon m •hich . . a) •tueh of the I• o brochun,s • ould likely anract you_ 1ndicaie ~ts. (b) whether the quohl)' of oppliconis allract':' Job apph- ~"er and why. and (c) other rccommcndauo•• Is hkely 10 Ill"' , •u ) OU hJ,c for e,11ing more and bc11cr Job •pphcanis g<n•
[)e1·tloP Your Skil/J E'..,nri,o· This chapter's Dc, el y . I- featUre presented four s1<ps for de.eloping• po op our Skill,
..... d. Working In a group of three lo five siudc s,111-. cmploier
.,._. • 1
, b • n s. use this pm. COSS 10 design an emp OJ er randing s1ra1egy ror a •ob hcl
be De · J dbyonc ofyoorgrouf mcm rs .. . scnhe lhe brand you •ould hke 10 cre- lle. and oothne the aetiv111c_s you • ould unden:ike 10 •stablish lhat illlllge aJ1l()ng 1nrgc1ed applicants for your chosen Job Be
10 sh alC your ideas • Ith the class. · l'f"Parcd
(AS[STIJDY
Rock Blocks is a concrete manufacrunng company. The com- pany has been in busi_ness for over 60 years, and furn ishes concrete blocks for building and landscape use. Rock Blocks IS owned and operated by rhe third gener:iuon of the founding family and has over 600 employees. Cus1omer demand for the company's producl5 is g~wing. but Rock Blocks is havi ng difficull}' aurncung and hinng enough manufacturing 131cn1 to keep up with demand. The company 1yp1cally posts openings for ilS specially positions on Internet sites including Monster. com and iis own careers site, bur the quality and quanury of applicanlS has been fa lling in recent year,;.
Accordingly 10 compan y president Roy Hanby. "conm1c manufacturing isn' 1 a poput:u cmcr choice. Unless someone has family or a friend working in the indusu;·. ii can be hard
10 convince them of the polcnrial of the job." Hanby explains
Semester-Long Active Learning Project
Building on your work for this project in the l,sl ch,pt<r, research. describe. and critically analy1e the alignment hc1"ccn existing rccruil- lng practices and the staffing ne,-ds of this key position. Recommend aJ1ema1i,e recruiting s1ro1cg1c<. methods. 1:irgct opplicanis. appropna1e J<CNilen, the training r.-cn1i1ers should recci1<. :ind how they should
Choptcr7 • Rc:cru11ing 197
J. O~nmg V1gnnr, £.r,rr,.st nus chapter's opening "lgnt'IIC dcscnbcd United Pnrccl S.rvlcc's social m<dio recruiting strale• gics Working alone or in groups of lhrct 10 fi,c s1udenu. 30.S'-'er the follo,...,ing questions Be prepared to sh:irc your answers "'1th the closs. I. Wh, 1 m<lncs do you suggest UPS 1rack 10 opumi,c its use of
social media in sourcing 1alcn11 2. What arc some ad,•M1ngc.s and disadvantages of UPS using
socinl mcdi3 almost nclusivcly to source drivers and package handlrrs•
3. What other sourcing strategics for dmcrs and package hll'l- dlm do )OU think would be dTccuve for UPS?
that stoning salaries and career growth potential arc high, and many employees feel proud having made something 1ha1 many people wi ll sec and use and that will be ,round for a long umc.
Questions
I. How can Rock Blocks increase the number of people that apply w11h the company? How con rcalisuc job prc,•ic" s be used to incre.ue interest?
2. Why do you think 1ha1 potential applicants m1gh1 nol be cnlhusiasuc about the idea of applying for jobs wi1h Rock Block>? Whal can recruiters do 10 change 1hcse perceptions?
3. Create a brief employer brand--0ncn1ed newspaper advcnisemcn1 for a basic manufactun ng posiuon for Rock Blocks.
----- ---- be rc,\ arded 3nd c,•alu1ucd. UMng \\ h:11 }OU learned 1n Chnpter 3. 1dcn- tif)' how your recruiting plan will cnublc the company lo comply \\Ith EEO and other legal requirements Abo. dc\ clop a ~mnplc m.•,~spa- pcr ad for the posi11on tha1 ioc-orpormcs both the- complrl)'<. emplo) cr
brand and a rcahslic Job preview
Case Study Assignment: Strategic Staffing at Chern's
See lhe •ppcndix 01 the hack of the book for this chopter's Case Study Assignment.
Endnotes I. "J'rack 10 Hire: UPS Speaks Value in Social Medi• at Som !
Recruiting Strategics Conference this Janu:iry." PR N, ,., Channtl. November 27. 2012. hupJ/•w"' pm<"_schanncl .eom/2012/ I t/27/1rack-10-hire-ups-1peak1-,••lue-in-soci;' -mcdia-a1-soclal-rttrui1ing-s1ra1cgics-confcrencc-lh11-JanUlll}' .
f IS ·a1Rccrui1ingS1ra1eg,,. 2. Broua1.L .. "Oneof1heM0S1 Succcss u oc, ml UPS," Unk //uma,rs. M:irth 28. 2013. hupJninkhumansco blog/onc-of-1he-mos1-succcssful-social-rccru•llng-,ir.ucgy•ups.
3. Mann. D A, "UPS. Other Firms Increasing!) Use Socia_! Media as Recruiting Tool," December 7. 2012. hup://\\ " " .h11Joumals .com/sanan10nio/prin1-cd11ion/20 1211 2/07/ups-01hcr-fi rm) .jncrc,singly-u,c h1ml7pagc=nll
4, ?(X)j Wauon \\'latl fl1unnn Cop,wl /11dtJ. Rtporf ..
5 G • al S F "llllmg ""h the Hoochos ,1 the Conuiner Store.
c. ' ' 8" \Voriforrr Mtuwgtmttll . Augu~t 2003 SO- -·
198 Oupi,r7 • RC\:JU1lllll'
6. Pf<ifcr. J. ~ Susain1N< Comp,.-uu,< Ad,llllllS<
Throu£h tb< EffC\."tl'< ~•~...-mau oi ""'1pl<. • ,1ra,J,m, of
1/arugnnou Eunm,. 9 (1995). 5.S-o9. .
7. Gulh. S \l. Plullip,. J ~L JllJ Kim. ~I. S.. "StrUlcy,<
RC\.~llnenC A \lull,J<,·,11~,~-u-,."To"l'r<"' in K. YT Yu
>no.I D ut-1< (C\l,.~ ~ Oofonl Han,Jboo/,. of RmwrmtnJ. :,.,,. Yen.· OuOI\! l·a.--.rsor- Press.
s. In \\'oss. D. -A\ OIJ ~ !lllJ Pr.ii R<ICruibnS." Ta/tnl ,1/ancg,.mnaz ,VaJ(Ollr. ~ ~11. .:0-23
9. -C.,Hir< Firm\\ 1m~bjorRC\.-ruitm<nL" nnls. • £n,rrpn.,rRrnt
•A•Car. a-..-...cru,,-prisc:w,·c.rom.'cn/:ibouL us/OMOU"'""mcntS
.html.
10. Sulh,-.n. J. "H"" a Foonc, CEO Bwll a World.Class R<ICruinng
DepJrtmau." ~ Rrmut111g Erchangt. 5<1"<mbcr 19.
::OOS. hl!J,.I"'"" ~19/ho"<i-formcr«o-bu~t-a ·• -.rl:kbss•l<\.-ruJtl/\..~-
11. R)l><S. S. L · R:m,itmco1. Job Choi«. and Post-Hire
Comcquen.-...,. In ~l D. ~ >no.I L .\I. Hough (eds.).
H.mdboc,I. of /nd,,smal and 011ani:at1ooal P~rhlJ/ogy (2nd rd.). P;iJo .\ho. CA. Consulw,;: Ps>cbolorui> Press. 1991. 399-J.J.I.
I! Su3. A. ~l :md L'gg,ni,-:K L ··Scqucno:il 311d Combined Effects of R<Craitm<nt lnfomurion on Appllconl Reaciions:·
Journal of 8 ,a,nas and P~cholog_,. 15 (WIO): 351-365. 13. Ba5Cd oo Hl"k. R. tl. Tllr RtrrwtrMnt Funruon. New Yorlc:
Aodem, of Mll!l3l!Cmatl Association. 1967.
I~. For ~ =-"~ <hscus.sioo of Lhc role of fairness in Lh< 1COt11ung and staffing process sec Arvey . R. D .. and Sackell.
P R. ·rmncss in S<lcctloo. Cu,reu Developments and Pm;pea,,,s." lo~ Sduruoand\V C.Bonn311 (C'ds.). P,noMr/
S</Lr1100 in 011an=io,u. San F=sco: Jossey-Bass.
1993. 171-102; Gillil3nd. S. w. and S1ttttcr. D D .. "Causes :md Cons<qi= of App!Jcnm Fairness." In R. Crop311zano
(ed.~ Justiu III tlrL Worlq,IDr,. Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2001. 175-195: Ryun. A. M. 111d PI0)han. R. E. "Applicants'
Prn:rptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical
Relicw and Agmda for th, Furure. • Jounwl of Managrmtnl,
16 (200lr. 5~. 15. Sdileicbcr. D. J. Vcn.bllrnmani, V. V .. Margeson. F. P , and
Campion. ~LA. -SO Yw Didn't G<t tb< Job .. .Now lVha!Do You
Tlunl:' Eumuung ()ppatumt)-io-Pafonn Fairness Pcrctptions."
P,rsonn,t PS)rhlJIDgy. 59 (Aununn 2006). 559-590.
16. R)l><S. S L and Conna1y. M L "Applicant Rc:ictioos 10
Ah<mam< S<la:tion Procedures: Jo11mal of Busin'1s a11d P~rhlJlog_,•. 7 (1993). 261-277. P!ullips. J. M . and Gully. S. M ..
"Fairness Reaaioos 10 Personnel S<lcctJon T <ehmqucs in
Sin~apon: and Lh< Urulcd Sl1lles." lnrU1ll111ona/Jouma/ ofH1u11ll11
R,soun:, .\lanag,maiL 13 (2002): 1186-1205: Slcincr. D . and
Gilliland. S. W .. "Fairros Reactions 10 Personnel Scl<CtJon
Techmqucs in Fr:ina: and Lhc Unuol Sillies: Jo11mo/ of App/i,d
P~chlJlo!{), 81 (1996): IJ+. 1-11.
17 Phillips and Gully. ·· FOJ mcss Reacuons 10 Pcoonnel Selccuon
Techniques in Singapore and th< Lnu<d Slfilcs."; St<incr and
Gilhl.lnd. "'Frum<» Rcacuons 10 l'<:Mnn<I Sela:tion T cchniqucs
on FrJOce and the Unurd Suics •
18 Rynes. S L. BretL R. D. Jr. :ind Gcrlun. B . me lmponancc
of Rccn11tmcn1 in Job Choice· A D1 ffcrcn1 Way of Looking:·
Perw n11,/ PS\chology, -1-1 (1991 I 487-521.
19 Gilliland. S W . me Pmei, ed F:um<ss of Sclccuon S\lt<ms
An Organ itltiOnJI Justice PerspcctJ\c,"ArudemJ o/Mann~em, 111 R,om 1•. 18. 4 (19931 69-l-73J. Ph,lh ps and Gull). "Faimc«
Rcacuons lo Pc!l)Onncl SC'IC"C'tion TC"Chniqucs m Sing3porc :111d 1hc Um1cd Stares "
, 0. Golu. 5. M .. anJ G1annan1omo. C. M .. "Rccnu1e, F
and Atuaction 10 the Job· The Mcdiaung Role r "Ctidl""1 Abool ihc Or),'lfl1"11ion:· Jouma/ of Vocur,o, of lnr,
-16 (1995) 109-11 8. Lidcn. R. C .. and PaNJns, C ,al< ~~hai,.,,
Study of Job Appll':'"1 lntervic" Perceptions. A /\ ~,.., 0pponumues. and °' mogrnphic Charnc1ens1ics.. ~., p,_,.hology. J9 (1986). 109-123: Taylor. M s .:., P,"""",, • . • ~ .. B<n>n,_ T J.. "OrganLZJIJOnal Rocruumcm Ae11viucs and A_ '.'"''Cl\
Reactions 31 D1ffcrcn1 Stages of the Recruitment 1'Ph""1b'
Pmomrrl PS)rho/08).' -IO ( 1987). 261- 285: Rynes, t~- ~hU<r. fl E.. "R<1Crull<r and Job lnflucnccs on CancJ L, "°II
Employm<n~" Jo,imal of App/i,d f S)rlwlov. 68 0 9~ d.ut. r0r
I~ .. Homs. M. M .. anJ Fink. L. S .. "A Field Study or }l ll6,.
Reactions 10 Employment Opponumtics· Docs the R PfJIICarj Make a Di/Terence'!" P,no1111,I PS)-rlwlov•. 4011987). 7
ccn,,.,,
21. Rynes. S. L . 311d Barber. A E .. "Apphcant Attraction St 6.5- 7&1
An Organ,zational Pcrspccuvc." Acad,m v of Man riucg,,. Rn·,,,.·. I 5 ( 1990) 286-310. ag,..,.,
22. Sullh an. J . "Best Rocruiting Practices from the W ,
Most Bu£Jncss-Likc Recruiting Function, Pan 3 .. £/ Orld 1
R,rnurmg £rcha11g,. October 3. 2005. ht;p:/t:''.'"""
. nct/2005/ I 0/03/ bcst • rccru i ling- practices-from-the ~."' "'
-mos1-business-like-rccruiting-func1ion-pan-J/. · ~orlds
23. S1evens.L. "Too M311yCmdidalcs?" ERE.net, September I. ~
hllp://www. ere. ne 1/ 2008/09/0 I / 1 OO· man Y•candidat"
-no-problcm/#more-380 I.
24. Gluock. w .. "Recruiters and Exocuti,·es: How Do They I\II Job Choice?" Jo11mal of Coll,g, Plac,m,m, 34 ( 1973)· 77.7;
15. Rynes. Bn,tz. and Gcrhan. "The lmponance of Rccruitm<ni m
Job Choice." 26. "Bill Gl!cs, Co-Founder Microson Corpor:uion," Rtrnu~,
Maga;,n, 011/111,. Apnl I . 2003, www rccruit<T'.co,nl
magazinconlinc/(µ(} I 03.top IO_ I .cf m.
27. Rynes. Brct.t. and Gerhan: " fhc lmponancc of Rocruitm<nt in
Job Choice." 28. Rynes. S. L.. Hcncman. 1-1. G.. 111. and Schwab. o. P ..
"Individua l Reactions 10 Organizational Recru11ing : A Re\/,-:
Prrso1111,I PS)·c/10/ogy, 33 ( 1980): 529-542.
29. Ibid 30. Brcaugh. J A .. Rtcrullmt'fJI: Scit11rr and Pr<1ctir,, Bostoo
PWS-Kenl Publi shing Company. 1992: Hawk. The Hrcn11tmt111
Funrt,on; Connerley. M. L.. and Rynes. S. L . 'The ln0ucnct
of Recruiter Charxteristics and Organizational R<eruiuncnt
Suppon on Percci, ed Recruiter Effectiveness: Views From
Applicants and Rocruiters," H11ma11 Helmio11s, 50 (1991)
1563-1586: Goltz and Giannan1onio, "Recruiter Fricndllness
and Auraction 10 the Job.": Powell. G. N .. "Effocts of Job
Attributes and Recruiting Practices on Applicant Dccis,oru
A Comparison," l'usunnel Psycholagy. 37 ( 191!4): 72 1- 732.
Schm,u. N. and Coyle. B. IV .. "Applicant 0..-cisions in th<
Employmcn1 Interv iew:· Jo11mal of Applt,d PS)cho/og).
61 (1976): 184-192: Ta)lor and B<rgmann. "Organization~
Recruitment Ac11,i1ie< and Applicants ' Reactions at DifT<1<nl
Stages of the Recruitment Process.": Alderfer. C. P .. and McConl.
C G .. "Personal and Situational Factors in the Recruit,nctll
ln1m iew." Jo11ma/ of Applied f'sychology, 34 ( 1970): 377-385:
Harris and Fink. "A Field Study of Applicant Reactions '° Emplo)•mcnt Opponunitics.": Maurer. S. D .. Ho"e. V .. and Let,
T. W , "Organizational Rocnoi1ing as Marketing Managcmcnr
An l111erdisc1plinary Study of Engineering Graduates:· p,rso,wl
PS)·clw/ogy, 45 (1992): 807-833: Rynes and Miller. "R'""'' 1"
and Job Influences on Candidates for Employment.": Turt,J/1,
r
-
D B., and Doughcny. T. W . "lnflu<ncc,, or Canipus R . ~ ApPlicartl Altr.lCtion 10 Finns." llrodrm> of M ccruumg /OIJf71Jll, 35 ( 1992): _739-765: l idcn and Parsont:;t;,;;~ 5n,dy of fob Apphcan1 lm~rvicw Perceptions, Ahemath < apportUll'ucs. _and Dcmograp~,c Charac1enstic, •·
)I R)11CS- "RCC":'11me.~1. Job Choice. and Post-hire Consequences."
32. Rynes and Mille~: Rocruuer 311d Job Influences on Candidates for Employment.
)). Rynes. ~re':' and Gcrhan. "The lmponancc or Recruitm<nt '"
JobChOICC. )4, 1\lrban· D. B .. Form. M. L , and Hcndnekson. C. L .. "A pphcam
AIU1CtiOO 10 Fir~s: Influences of Organization R<putmion.
Job and Orgamzauonal A11nbu1cs, and Rocru11er Bch:ivion •
Joumal ofVocario110/ B, hal'lor, 52 (1998): 24-44. ·
)5. Maurer, Howe. and Lee. "Organizational Recruiting as
Mlll'keting Management."
)6. Adapted from Barber, A. E .. Recn,11ing fmp/oytts: /ll{ffl'ldi,a/
ond Orgoniwional Prrs/>frliv,s, Thousand Oaks. CA: Sag<.
1998, )7. Rynes. Heneman. and Schwab. "Individual Reactions 10
Org1lnizational Rocruiting."
)8. Rynes. Bretz. and Gerhan. 'The lmponancc of Recruitment in
Job Choice." 39, Rynes. Heneman. and Sch,.ab. "Individual Reactions 1o
Organizational Rccruiling."
40, Jones. D. A .. Schulz. J. W .• and Chapman, D. S .. "R« ruiting
Through Job Advcnisrments: The Effects of Cognith·•
Elaboralion on Decision Making," lmernatio11al Jolmwl of
S,l«tion and Asswm,111, 14. 2 (June 2006): 167-179.
41 . Royal, K. E .. and Austin. J .. "Evaluation of a Hypoth<ti<al
Company Rocruitcr by Management Students."' P,yc/10/og,ral
Rtports, 70 ( 1992): 89-90. 42. Stolberg, S. G .. "Saved by the Cell," R111gm ,\/ago:int, Fall
2003: 2&-45. 43. Fishtt,C. D .. llgcn. D. R .. and Hoyer, IV. D .. "SourccCr<d1bili1y.
Jnfonnation Favorabi lily. and Job Offer Acrcptancc," Aradtmy
ofManag,mt11t / 011noal, 22 (1 979): 9-1-103.
44. Koller. K .. T/,e L,ad,rs/11p Far1or, New Yo,l: The Free Press.
198&. 45. Hymowitz, C. and Green. J .• 'These Days. Anybody Can
Headhunt," B/oombrrg811smmll'ffk, Janua,y 21-27. 201 3. 19.
46. Ibid 47. Tuutti. C .. "Workforce Challenges Continue lo ltarnp<r FDA,"
fClV, November 27. 2012. Available onl ine: hllpJ/fc\\ .COml
articlcs/2012/11 /27/fda-workforcc.aspx.
48. Huff, A. "!l's All in the Cab." CCJ Maga:int, December 2006.
www.ctruckcr.com/opps/ncws/aniclc.asp?id=56838.
49. Moth" v. Phillips Chrvroltr /11c .. 269 FJd 771. 2001 U.S. App.
(7th Cir. 200 I). 50. Thunderbird. "Recruiter Profile: Johnson & Johnson. In Search
of Leaders .. £-Th1111dtr Nms. J311uary 2003. "ww.1hu ndcrbml.
edu/abou1~us/1hundcrbird_ncwslc_thundcr_news/jan_ 2003/
rccru iler_profile.htm. 51. Lavelle. L.. "Come 10 Cahl• l•Faw-Nia." Bi1Jillm\Verk.
June 26. 2006: 12. s I r 52 Fombru n. C. J .. Tichy. N. M .. and Dc\'annl, M. A.. ,ra ,g,
l/1111U111 Reso11rc, Ma11ag,111tlll. New York: John Wiley &
Sons. Inc .. 1984. R ruiting ,n 53. Ryn•• S L and Boudreau . J. W .. "Co llege ec h - . .. . . ~~-Large Organi,alions: Pracuce, Evaluauon.
I . 39 (1986)' 72 9-757.
Implications:· Prrso1111,I Pr)c/10 °K>• . · s .. 54. Rynes. "Recruitmen t. Job Choice. 311d Posr-h,rc Consequence .
Chlptcr 7 • Rccruuing 199
55 llammonds, K. l·I . "Handle with Cote." Fas, Company. August
2002 102-107, 56 "2007 Traini ng Top 125," Trai11111g Maga:,,o,. Mlfch 2007.
www lrainingmag com/managcsmar1cr/i magc s/pdfs/2007
Topl25.pdr 57. DiCcsare. C. 8 . "Salling-Union Organi,crs Win Righi Not
10 Be Discrimina1cd Against in Hiring-The Law at Work,"
Mo111/,/y /..obor R,i•itw, April 1996, hup://ftndaniclcs.com/p/
3111clcs/mi_ml 153/isJ>4_v l 19/ai.18355639.
58. E>tcrior Systems. Inc. and Op<rati,e Pl:ist<r<rs and Cem<nt
Masons International Associuuon of United S1atcs and Canada.
AFl,.CIO. Local 8. Case -1-CA-29852. 59 Byham, W. C .. "K«ping Job Candidates from B<eoming lost
Hires.·· f/R Magocin,, December 1990. 52-54.
60. Lcll:ow. D.. "Proacth·c Rccn11Ling Metrics." ERE.net.
December 13. 1006. h11p://www.cre.ne(i2()()6,IJ 2/IJ/proaC11\'C·
rccruiting~mctricsl. 61. Sulliv:10. J.. '1'hc Recruiter's Scorecard: Assessing the
Effectiveness of Individual Recru iters." ERE.net. October 27,
2003. www.erc nelianicles/db/61A88F9B B9CB463FAA83 12
AB2D518837.asp 62 Sullh311, J . "The Top Str:ueg,c R<eruiting Metrics.'' EREncl.
September 29. 2003. "ww.erc.nclianiclcs/db/ I C703C7D79424
10ABAC2AC28B698FE84.asp. 63 Barber, Rerr1111,ng Employns. 64 Staffing org and the Hum311 Capital M<trics Consonium.
1004 Runm,ng Mttncl and Ptr/on11a11u Btnclimark Rrpon.
Willow Grove, PA: S1al'fing org. Inc. 2004. 65. Hansen. F.. "R<crUiting Inside th< Loop," \Voriforc,
Managtmtm Onhnt, Apnl 2008, hnp //www.v. orlr.forcc.com/
scr1ion/06/ka1urc/25/45/83/indcx.h1ml. 66. Aseh. B J .. "Do lnccnti\C's Mauer? The Case or Novy R<eru11crs:·
flltl11J1ria/ and /..obor Rtlatw11s R,i•itw, 43 (1 990): 89S-106S.
67. Hirschm:in. C .. "Incentives for Recruiters., .. HR Maga:.ittt,
Nove mber 2003. 86-92. 68. Caner. L .. "How Bank of America Dc\Clops Lcadc,,.hip Talent
Around the World," Ta/em Managrm('nl Maga:.mr. April
2012: 18. 69 Donovan. K. M .. "Build a Wonmng Global Rocruiting Strategy."
Tal,111 Mar,agtmtttt Maga:.ml'. July 2012: 24-27.
70. Rynes. "R<erui1mcn1 .JobChoice. and Po,t-HircConscqucnces"
71. Ibid. 72. Sec Barber. Rernm ing £mployus. 73. Tom. V. R .. 'The Role or Personality ond Organi,auonal
Images in the Recruiting Process." Orga11i:.mional Brlta,·ior
011d H1u11a,1 Dmsio11 Proanes, 6 ( 1971 ): 573-592.
74. Allen. D. G .. Mal\10. R. V .. and Otondo. R. F .. ·-Web-ba>td
Recruitment: Effects of Information. Organi1.ational Brand. ltld
Attitudes Tov.a.rd a Web site on Applican1 Attrxlion." Jounwl
of App/,,d l'syrhology. 92 (2007): I 696-1708. 75 G3le\\ ood, R. D . Gow311, M. A .. and Lau1enschlagcr. G. _J ..
"Corporate Image. Rocrui1mcn1 Image. and Initial Job Choice
Decisions." Aradtmy of Mcmag,111,111 Jounwl. 36 (2003)·
414-127. 76. Ibid. 77. Ibid. 78. KOllcr. P .. and Pfocnsch. W .. 8 18 8rm1d Ma11agemtlll.
New Yo,k. Spnnger. 2006. . 79. Lcmmink. J.. Sehuijf. A.. and Streulcn<. S.. The Role
r Corporate Image and Company Employment Image i_n
~,plaining Application Intentions:· Jo11rnt1/ of l:.ro11om1r
Psychologr. 24 12003): 1- 15. G>te\\Ood, R . "Corporate tm,ge.
200 Ch.lp<cr 7 • Rmu,un~
Ro::ruianau I~ snJ lniusl Job Choi~ [)(\.-isions. - Arodem,·
ofManag,mrnt Jcwnal. 36. 1 (Apnl 19931: 414.
SO. T,jfd. H • !Uld Tumc-r. J. C.. 111, Social ldcnuty ThCOI)' of Groop Behmer.- In S. IVon:hd and W. G. Ausun (em.).
Psw-lwlog__v of /,urrgnJfl{) Rrlanons. Vol 2. Chicago: Nelson-
Hall I 985 7-14, 8 I. Go!c" o..-xt. Go"-.n. anJ uurc:n.<chlog,r. ·-co,por.uc lmlg<.
Rrouitmenr Im>£<. !Ind lniri:il Job Choice Dc<.isions.: Turban.
D s_ 311d Gi=ing. D \\' .. -Corpora,< Soci!l Performance and ~oruJ A=•-cness 10 Prospccthc Employccs.-
A rodmn ofMcnag~n1 J01Jmal. -1() ( J 997): 658-672.
81. ~l,uqua. J •• "\\ be:,, Br>nd Alooc, 1sn·1 Enough." IVorliforrt
Managnrvn1. Man:h 13.1006: I. 39-41. www.,. orkforcc.com/
m:hivc/fc3111ref1.if.!.9/58/iode, .php?ht=mcdonald\l, 20s\l, 20
rncd003ld~:!Os. SJ. Bsrrov. . S_ !Uld Mosley. R.. Tht Employtr Brand: Bringing
IN & sz of Brand .VanagrmLtU to Proplr 01 Work. New York:
\\'iley.~ 84 s.m,,.. 311d ~loslcy. ~ Emplowr Brand. 85. )hid.
86. Bcmord Hooe, Glolx!J KCl"·ori<. ·-CJolx!J Employer Br.uid Srudy ,.
Si. Ibid.
88.. :-1ACE. -:1009 Recruiting Bcnchrn31ts Survey.· October 1009,
hnp:/1"-,.·" .ll3C<" eb.org/Rcsc:u-ch..asp.,•&&JwEXAQUFa W5k
ZJi.gflmdZnR+IX5+1X42NH4hljEy~IH4hfkZhbHNJftF+N34
h.fjFN&lffi loo6dAJAJ<m+vLE91V96rulQ=.
89. G.isp:uinio. C.. - M<:rriU Lynch Wants Kew Ads 10 Airer hs
SLlid lrn.,gc. - Anan Wall Strw Jouma/. January IJ. 2000.
""'" .c.,prrssindi.l.com/fe/d.li.ly/20000113/fco I 30?..5.hrml.
90. Ah"=. P. IL ~ Adn,tising Su"·ey: Mllg3Zines. TV
Top ·90 Media Lists. - Publk &iaJum, Journal. 47 ( I 99 I): 14-15.
91 For funber inform:uion abour lhe role of instrumenr:il fu nc•
tions JDd symbobc mc:mings :issociated " ' lh brands. and abou1
illlll!'( brandmg in general. sec Lic'<ns. F .. and Highhousc. S ..
111c Rcl:llion of lnstrumcnlll.l and Symbolic Auribu rcs 10
a CompJny's Anrxtheness as an Emplo)er." Ptrsonn, I
Psychology. 56 (:!003): 75-!02: G:uuner. B. B .. and Levy. S. J ..
11r Produa and I.be Brand. - Han•ard Busintss Rtv;l!w, 33
(1955): 3J-39: Keller. K. L . Strattgic Brand Managemem .
Upper Saddle Ri•'er. NJ · funtice Hall. 1998: KalZ, D .. 'The
Functional Approach 10 lb, Srudy of Auirudcs;· Public Opinion
Qunnul_1 , 14 t 1960): 16J-20-I. Aal.er, J. L.. "Dimensions of
Brand Pcrson•.hry.- Journal of Marketing Rtstarch. 3~ (1997):
J.1 7-356: Aa>.er. J L. 111c .\IJllc:,i,le Self: The Role of Self-
e.tpl'C)iion in Persmmon.- Jounw/ of Marl..t'lmg Rl'.uarch.
93 Producr branding books including Strat,•gic Bra,,d M
Bm/d,ng, Mrruuring, and Managing Brand F.qu, a,,a8t~
Lane Keller or Th• 22 l111111111abl, Laws of B, / by k ... ,,
Build a Produr , or S,n•;ce into a World-ClaJs :: ,,,g· 110\i. ,0 and Al Ries pro•i dc a good 01 ervicw of branding
0nd by Lau,,
94 Ruiz. G.. "Job Cand1da1e Asscssmcnr Tesrs go .
Worlforr, Managtmtnl 011li11, . January 2008 h Vr nua1:
. workforcc.com/scc1ion/06ffca1urc/25/3 Jn 9tindc, ·h Up.//,,,
95 Lachnir. C .. "Ready for !he R~sumt Deluge " ii' · ;: 1
2002· 16. ' or ~orr,., Jul)
96. Redman._ T .. a nd _Mauh~:"s. B. P .. "'Advertising for Eft
Manage:nal Rccru11.mC'nl. Jou ma I of General Maua rttJic (1992): 29-1-1. gtmt•t, 18
97 Ibid. 98. Gulhrid~. M .. Komm. A. B .. and Lawson. E .• "Makin T
a S1.r:ucgic Priority ... Mr KinJry Q1Ja rterly. Janu g aJcni
hups://www.mckinscyquarrerly .com/Organi,ario~ 200!.
Making_1alen1_a_srr.11egic_priori1y_2092. •lenu
99. Trank. C. Q .. Rynes. S. L.. and Brcrz. R. D Jr .. "An r,cti
Applicants in !he War for Talenr: Diffe rences in W ng
Prererenccs among High Achie\'ers," Journal of Bwmns ort
Psychology. 16. 3 (2001 ): 331 - 345. aoJ
JOO. R.au, B. L . and Hyland, M . M .• "Corporate Teamwort
Diversir y S1aremen1s in College Recru irme nr Brochures: Er! and
on Auraction:· Jo11mol of Applitd Social Psychology 33 ~ (2003): 2465-2492. ' ' •
IOI. Rao: B. L.. and Adams. G. A .. ·:Auracting Retirees 10 Apply.
Desired Organrzauonal Characren srics of Bridge Employmen1, -
Jo11mal of Orga11i:ational Bd,m•ior, 26 (2005): 649~.
102. Gulhridge. Komm. and Lawson. "'Making Talcnr a Suar- Prioriry." ·•·'
!03. Ibid. 10-I. 105.
Sec Barber. Recruiting Employtts.
M~, N. A .• and Bell. J. A .. "Effccli\'encss of Specificiry m
Rccrurlm(nl Ad1•ertising:· Joumal of Mmwg,•m,111, 12 (1986)
425--132.
106. Sartain, L.. Schumann, M .. Bra11dfrom rh, Inside. San Franci,co
Josscy- Bass. 2006; Aa.ker, D. A .. Ma11ag111g Brand &,u,Q· Capitali:.mg on the Value of a Brand Namr, New York · The
Free Press. I 99 I: Keller, K. L .• "Conceprualizing, Measuring.
and Managi ng CuSlomer-bascd Brand Equiry;· I-JO:
36 Cl999J • 5-57. K:uz. D . "The Func1ional Approach 10 rhe
SrudJ of ~-11,rudes -. Durgcc. J F .. "Undemanding Br.ind
Pcrsonalu). Journal of Cons11mer ,\larl.L11ng 511 988)· '1 -'5·
Cobt•Walgrcn. C. J .. Ruble. C A.. and N~nlhu, N . .-.~B,.";,,j
Equuy, Bran~ Prrference. and Pu1chast Intent " Jo11mal of
Adi,nmng. > (1995): 25-l(); Keller. K. L . "Concepruah,ing,
~le3Sunn~. and Marogmg Cusromer-based Brand Equ11 - Jo11nwl of Mar<ellng. 57 (1993)· 57 J-'1· E ,,. y. 5,. au J --s d Eq . . -·· rucm, T .• and
O,erman. S., "Show Off Your Brnnd:· Staffing Managtmtn,
2. 2 (Apri l- June 2006). www.shnn.org/ema/s m/articlcs/2006'
apriljune06cover.asp: Hornung , M .. '"The Case for Emploia
Branding," Bemard Hod,s Group, April 2007, www.ho<ks
. com/publicalions/inrerviews/homung .asp.
I 07. Barber A. E .. and Roehling, M. v .. "Job Postings and 11< Decision 10 lnrerview: A Verbal PrOlocol Analysis:· Jo11malo/
Applitd Psychology, 78 ( 1993): 845-l!56.
I OS. Ibid: Rynes, S. L., Schwab, 0 . P .. and Hcneman. H. G .. "The
Roi~ of Pl) and Maiker Pay Variability in Job Applicaiioo
Decisions," Orga11i:.arional Beha vior and f/11ma11 DrriJUJII
Processes, 31 (1983): 353-364. , . . ran UH) as II S1gruJing Phenomenon," Journal
~fC011sw11er PS)cholog)', 72 (1998)· 131-157. Plummer, J T
I fow Pcrsonaluy .\ lakes a Difference." l ouma/ of Ad1,ni~i11 .,
R,ua~clt. 40 (2000J. 79-l!3: Tom. "The Role of Pmonalir an!
OrgamzatJOnaJ Image~ i.n the Rc-cruiting Process." Y
Q~ La)nc. A .. 'The Care and Fecchng or Talem," Ftilt Com n
Oc1oh<r 2000. ""w.f3S1compan) .com/an icle'12000, ipal/ >· _kas1rn html. ac'I
109 Rynes, Schwab. and Heneman. 'The Role of Pay and MaMI
Pay Variab iliri• in Job Applicalion Decisions." _ 11 O. Batbcrand Roehling. "JobPoslings and the Decision 10 Jnlef\'i<" ·
~ncs. S. L .. and Lawler. J .. "A Policy-Capturing lnl'ellig:uion ~ 1 Role of Expcc1ancics in 0..--cisions 10 Pursue Job Allernaui cs.
Jo,,mal of Applied Psicholog)'. 68 ( J 983): 620-63 I. 111
· Rynes and Lawler. "A Policy-Capturing Jnvesrigarion of•~
Role of Expcc1ancics in Decisions 10 Pursue Job Allernalll CS
r
I 12. Sch"_ocrcr, C .. and Rose~, B .. "Effccu of Employmenr ar w ,11
Policies and Com~nsa.~1on Pohc1cs on Corporate Ima c and
Job Pursuil ln1cnL1ons. Jounro/ of Appli,d p . 1 g (1989): 653-656. S)C wlog)'. 14
JIJ. 5,1<s. A. M •• Leck. J. D .. and Saunde rs. D. M .. "Effects of Applicalion Blanks and Employmenr Equuy on A Ii
Rcaclions and Job Pursun lntcn Lions," Journal o/Or a, .~P cant
Brharior, 16 ( I 995): 4 I 5-430. g 11 •"
110 "
01
114 Barber and Roehl i ng. --Job PoSlings and lhe Decision 10
Jntcrvicw."
115_ Based on Chapman. D. S .. Uggmle, , K. L ., Carroll, s. A ,
pjas,nun, K. A .. and Jones. D. A .• '"Applicanr Allraction
Organization and Job ~~oicc: A Mc1a-analy1ic Review :~
the Correlates of Recru11rng Ou!comcs." Joumal of A.pplitd
PSJ•d 1ology. 90 (1 995): 928-9-1-1: Brraugh. J. A .. •nd Srarke. M ..
•·Research on Employee Recruirmcnr: So Many S1udies. So
Many Remaining Queslions:· Journal of Managrmtnt, 26. 3
(June I, 2000): 405--134: Taylor, M. S .. and Collins. c. J , ''Organi1.ationaJ Recruitment Enhancing the Intersection
of Reswch and Pr.icrice:· In C. L. Cooper and E. A. Locke
(eds.). l11d1utrial tmd Orgw11;:atio,iaJ Psychology: LJnki,,g
Th,ory wirh Praelic,. Osford, UK: Black"ell. 2000, 304-330:
Ryan. A. M .. and Tippins. K. T .. "Aurac1ing and Selecting:
Whal P:sychological Research Tells Us," llunUJ11 Rtsourcr
Manag,m,nt. 43. 4 (Winier 200-I): 305-318.
116. Based on Chapman. D. S .. Uggcrslev, K. L .. Cam,11, S. A .
Piascntin. K. A .. and Jones, D. A .. "Applican1 Auraction 10
Organizalions and Job Choice.": Brcaugh and Siarkc. "Rcsc:arch
on Employee Recrui1mcn1.": Taylor and Colli ns. "Organi,.aiional
RecrwtmcnL ,.
117. Phillips, J. M .. "EffcclS of Realisric Job Previews on Mul1iple
Organizalional Ourcomcs: A Mera-Analysis:· Acadt111)' of
Manog,mt nl Joumal, 41 ( 1998): 673-690.
118. Kranz, G .. "New Employee,: 'We Were Jobbed Abour This
Job." Workforce.com, Febru:iry I, 20 IJ. sysrcmic di scrimina•
lion: a process or prncticc di scriminates against s1gnitic:u1t num-
bers of applicanlS or employees.
119. Ibid. 120. Sullivan, J .. "A ma,ing Prac1ices in Rccruiring-ERE A"ard
Winners 2009." ERE.ne1 . 2009. hup1/www.crc.ne112009/04/20/
amazing-practiccs-in-rccrui1i ng-ere-award-winncrs-2009-pan
-2-of-2/#morc-7569. 121. Wanous. J. P .. Orga11i;:a1io11al Emry: Rrrroitmtnt, Stlrr1io11,
and Socialhatio11 of Newcomers, Reading, MA: Addison-
Wcslcy, 1980 . 122. Phillips, "'EffcclS of Reali>1ic Joh Pre•·iews on Mulliplc
Organizati onal Outcomes.··
123. Wanous, Orga11i;:atio11al Entry. 124. Salancik. G. R.. and Preffcr.J.. "A Soci•I lnforma1ion Processing
Approach 10 Job Auirudcs and Task Design," Mm1msrra1r,·t
Sci,nc, Q11artuly, 23 ( J 978): 22-1--253.
Chaprcr 7 • Rccruiring 201
125 Chen. X. and Tsui, A. S . "An Organ izational Pcrspccth·c
on Multl-Lc\·cl CulluraJ Integration: Human Resource
Management Practices in Cross-Cultural Con1exts," In Francis
J. Yammarino and Fred Dansereau (cd ). Multi-Uvtl /ss11,s
in Social Synt11u (Research in Multi Level Issues. Vol. S).
Emerald Group Publishing Li mired. 2006. 8 1-96.
126. "McDonald's Recrui1mcnt Drive Hits Back at Critics."
Pt rso1111rl Today. Apri l 21. 2006, www .pcrsonneltoday.com/
An1clcs/2006/0U21/34977/~lcDonald's+rccruitmentMri \'C+hit
s+back+al+critic.s.htm. 127. Dineen. 8 . R .• Ash. S. R , and Noc. R. A .• "A Web of Applicanr
Attraction: Person-Organization Fil the Context or Wcb--ba.scd Rccruilm(n1:· Journal of Applitd PS}~lwlogy, 87 (2002): 723-734.
128. Marlts, S.. "ZipRc:cruircr Adds New Candid•rc Scoring
Feature," Recruiter.com. April 16. 2013. http://www.rccruitcr
.com/'J/ziplttl'Uiler-adds-ncw-candidate-scoring-featurc/.
129. U.S. Equal Employmenr Opponunity Commission, Besl
Practices or Pri vntc Sector Employers. 1997, www.ccoc.gov/
aboutceoc/1ask_rcpons/pr:lctice.h1ml. 130. Ibid. I 3 I. Broo:u. '"One of !he Mosr Successful Social Recruiring Srr.ucgie,:·
IJ1 Ibid. 133. Raphael. T.. " fracking Social Medi• Rc:cruiring a,
UPS:' ERE.nc1. Scprcmber 13. 2010. hup://"ww.ere
.net/20 10/r1J/13hracking-social-mcdia-rccruiting -at-ups/'!utm_
source;ER£+Mcdia&:utm_eampai gn=4736099db6-ERE·D•il y
-Soc,al-Media-Recrui1ing&u1m_mcd ium=email#morc-l 4735.
I 34. ·-rrack 10 Hire: UPS Speaks Value in Social Media at Social
Recruiting Stra1cgics Conrercncc this January:·
135, Brouat. "One of the Most Succc~srul Social Recruiting
Strategics." 136. Mann, D. A., "UPS, Orhcr Firms Increasingly Use Social ~kdia
as Rccruiring Tool. .. 137. Ibid. 138. Brouar. '"One of rhc Mosr Successful Social Rccruiling S1ra1egies."
I 39. Tanner, L.. "Net Advantages: Online Recruitment Saves in Time.
Costs.'' Washi11g1011 Business Joumal. Nm·cmbcr S. 2004. " 'WW.
bizjoumals.com/washing1on/s1oricsl2004/l l/08/focus2.h1ml.
140. Lumsden, H .. "The Planr VisiL A Crucial Arca of Recruiting:·
Jo11m al of College Plac,m,iu, 27 ( 1967 ): 74-84: Do"ns.
C. W .. "Perceptions or 1hc Selection lnlen·icw:· Pusom,el
Admi11is1ra11011, 32 ( I 969): 8-23. 141 . Do wns. "Perceptions or lhc Sclc-ction Interview.''; Fi sher, llgc11 .
and Hu)er. "Source Crcdibiliry. lnfo rmarion F3\'0robili1y. and
Job Offer Accep1ance:· 142. Rogers, D.. and Sincoff. M.. ··Favorable Impression
Charac1cris1ics or the Recruitment ln1en•ie:"cr," Ptrsow,el
l' S}·drology. 3 I ( 1978): 495-50-I.