Complete Matrix
Week 6 Assignment
Research Concepts Matrix
Please note that the first row of data is meant as an example. Please read the example article (Garriott, Hudyma, Keene, & Santiago, 2015) as a guide for how to dissect each article assigned.
|
Reference |
Purpose of the study |
Statement of the Problem |
Limitations/Implications |
Ethical Conduct in the Study |
Future research possibilities (e.g., how could a researcher extend the research detailed in the study) |
|
Garriott, P. O., Hudyma, A., Keene, C., & Santiago, D. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first and non-first-generation college students’ academic and life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000066 |
The purpose of the study was to extend the literature on the utility of Lent’s (2004) normative model of well-being in predicting the academic and life satisfaction of college students and to test the full model replicate past findings with previous samples.
|
Many first-generation college students experience higher education differently than their non-first-generation peers They may have different qualities than fellow students who aren’t first generation including being enrolled in college part-time, lower-income, less active in extracurricular activities, and less academically prepared.
|
The sample was not very diverse—it was predominantly white students which didn’t represent the typical first-generation students limiting generalizability and females were over-represented. Because of the study sites being oriented toward first-generation students, the participants may have reported more support than if there were in other university settings.
|
Researchers gained IRB approval, site permission from university administration and offered an incentive of entry into a raffle to win one of 10 $25 gift cards. Participants could choose not to answer questions about gender. |
Future studies could examine actual support rather than just perceived support. A longitudinal study could see long term effects of support. And, research on actual interventions might be useful as well.
|
|
Johnson, S. R., & Stage, F. K. (2018). Academic engagement and student success: Do high-impact practices mean higher graduation rates? Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 753-781.https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olive, T. (2014). Desire for higher education in first-generation Hispanic college students enrolled in a graduate counseling program. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 45(1), 72–91. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schelbe, L., Swanbrow Becker, M., Spinelli, C., & McCray, D. (2019). First generation college students perceptions of an academic retention program. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(5), 61–76. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smith, K. J., Emerson, D. J., Haight, T. D., Mauldin, S., & Wood, B. G. (2019). An examination of the psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale - 10 (CD-RISC10) among accounting and business students. Journal of Accounting Education, 47, 48–62. |
|
|
|
|
|
1