Screening and Interviewing external candidates
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
TESTING: SOME BASIC CONCEPTS
ONE WAY TO “PICK” THE BEST APPLICANT
Richard J. Wagner, PhD
Part-time Faculty
Capella University
Uupdated: January 28, 2016
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
Intelligence
Cognitive ability
Skills
Integrity
Drug testing
Aptitude
Medical tests
Personality
Language skills
Computer
Driving
Typing
TYPES OF TESTS USED FOR SELECTING CANDIDATES
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
ISSUES IN TESTING
Legal issues: job-related, reliable, valid
Test must be all three of the above to be used as a selection device
Errors:
False positives (pass the test but can’t do the job)
False negatives (fails the test but can do the job)
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
CUT-OFF SCORES
Importance during selection:
This is the score above which we “hire” and below which we “do not hire”
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
TESTING OPTIONS TO CONSIDER
Using a test score by educational level
Cognitive ability:
- For the Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT) (0-50 score range)
- High school graduate mean score: 21
- College graduate mean score: 29
Using a test score by “potential”
- For the WPT:
- 28 and over (17% of the population): potential for upper-level management
- Can draw conclusions from job situations
- 16-22 (27% of the population): routine office worker potential
- Must allow enough time and experience while training
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
MORE TESTING OPTIONS TO CONSIDER
Hiring in the upper 25% of a group
For the WPT:
- Mean score of 27 and above
- Upper 50%: WPT mean score of 22 and above
- Upper 75%: WPT mean score of 17 and above
By job category
Using the WPT to hire for the following jobs:
- Engineer: 28.6 average
- Claims adjuster: 26.9 average
- Meter reader: 20.9 average
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
TESTING ERRORS
A “test” that is 95% accurate is good, isn’t it?
What that means is 5% of the people tested (for example, in a test for illegal drugs), are inaccurately scored, so 5 people out of every 100 are scored incorrectly.
We don’t know:
Who is inaccurately scored
Who passed who should not have passed
Who failed but should not have failed
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
MORE ABOUT TESTING ERRORS
There are four quadrants in this diagram
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
TESTING ERRORS EXPLAINED
True positives
People who “pass” the test and would perform as the test predicts
- Example: Test indicates they do NOT use illegal drugs, and they really do NOT.
True negatives
People who “fail” the test and would not perform acceptably as the test predicts
- Example: Test indicates they DO use illegal drugs, and they really DO.
False negatives
People who “fail” the test but would perform acceptably, the opposite of what the test predicts
- Example: Test indicates they DO use illegal drugs, but they really do NOT.
False positives
People who “fail” the test but would not perform as the test predicts
- Example: Test indicates they do NOT use illegal drugs, but they really DO.
© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
*
The End