Screening and Interviewing external candidates

profilesthapa55
cf_testing_some_basic_concepts.ppt

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

TESTING: SOME BASIC CONCEPTS

ONE WAY TO “PICK” THE BEST APPLICANT

Richard J. Wagner, PhD

Part-time Faculty

Capella University

Uupdated: January 28, 2016

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

Intelligence

Cognitive ability

Skills

Integrity

Drug testing

Aptitude

Medical tests

Personality

Language skills

Computer

Driving

Typing

TYPES OF TESTS USED FOR SELECTING CANDIDATES

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

ISSUES IN TESTING

Legal issues: job-related, reliable, valid

Test must be all three of the above to be used as a selection device

Errors:

False positives (pass the test but can’t do the job)

False negatives (fails the test but can do the job)

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

CUT-OFF SCORES

Importance during selection:

This is the score above which we “hire” and below which we “do not hire”

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

TESTING OPTIONS TO CONSIDER

Using a test score by educational level

Cognitive ability:

  • For the Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT) (0-50 score range)
  • High school graduate mean score: 21
  • College graduate mean score: 29

Using a test score by “potential”

  • For the WPT:
  • 28 and over (17% of the population): potential for upper-level management
  • Can draw conclusions from job situations
  • 16-22 (27% of the population): routine office worker potential
  • Must allow enough time and experience while training

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

MORE TESTING OPTIONS TO CONSIDER

Hiring in the upper 25% of a group

For the WPT:

  • Mean score of 27 and above
  • Upper 50%: WPT mean score of 22 and above
  • Upper 75%: WPT mean score of 17 and above

By job category

Using the WPT to hire for the following jobs:

  • Engineer: 28.6 average
  • Claims adjuster: 26.9 average
  • Meter reader: 20.9 average

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

TESTING ERRORS

A “test” that is 95% accurate is good, isn’t it?

What that means is 5% of the people tested (for example, in a test for illegal drugs), are inaccurately scored, so 5 people out of every 100 are scored incorrectly.

We don’t know:

Who is inaccurately scored

Who passed who should not have passed

Who failed but should not have failed

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

MORE ABOUT TESTING ERRORS

There are four quadrants in this diagram

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

TESTING ERRORS EXPLAINED

True positives

People who “pass” the test and would perform as the test predicts

  • Example: Test indicates they do NOT use illegal drugs, and they really do NOT.

True negatives

People who “fail” the test and would not perform acceptably as the test predicts

  • Example: Test indicates they DO use illegal drugs, and they really DO.

False negatives

People who “fail” the test but would perform acceptably, the opposite of what the test predicts

  • Example: Test indicates they DO use illegal drugs, but they really do NOT.

False positives

People who “fail” the test but would not perform as the test predicts

  • Example: Test indicates they do NOT use illegal drugs, but they really DO.

© 2013 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY

*

The End