HW Security
1
_________________________________________________________________________
Celebrity Protection
Robert Matthiessen John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, NY USA Keywords Celebrity protection-site advance-motorcade and route management-formations-paparazzi
Definition
Celebrity protection is the protection of a human asset against harassment, injury, death and embarrassment
Introduction
When analyzing celebrity protection some would argue that it is the same as executive
protection, which are all part of the principles and fundamentals of close-protection security.
There are many variations in the close-protection field when it comes to protecting the human
asset. As mentioned, the fundamentals and principles remain the same if you are going to
ensure an effective protection strategy. However, one difference between providing executive
compared to celebrity protection security is the latter’s public exposure, but there are other
differences between the two.
When analyzing executive protection in comparison to celebrity protection, it should be noted
that executives are more reserved and unwilling to engage in extensive public interaction
compared to their celebrity counterparts. Most executives are corporate leaders responsible
for making important decisions for the company and their shareholders. Their unnecessary
exposure can result in danger by an unsuspecting individual. Since there is no immediate need
for unnecessary public exposure executives are primarily shielded from this level of threat. The
executive protection professional would advise against unnecessary or high-risk exposure when
it is not necessary, and for the most part the executive usually complies. On the contrary,
celebrities for the most part are dependent on their fan base and are more willing to interact
and be seen and photographed in public (Holder & Hawley, 1998).
This entry will identify celebrity security as the close-protection professional (CPP). If you look at
various videos and news reports, celebrities are the most exposed and accessible people in a
close-protection environment. The ability to navigate crowds and paparazzi in a public space
2
can be very demanding, if not dangerous, for both the celebrity and the CPP. The ability of the
CPP to protect a celebrity from harm and/or embarrassment will depend on the training and
experience of the CPP to perceive danger, react quickly, but also to remain rational and
professional at all times. When celebrities are seen in public they are usually surrounded by an
entourage of staff and security. The differences between executive protection professionals and
CPP for celebrities are many times reflected by the security person’s size, demeanor and even attire.
Unfortunately, celebrities believe that bigger means better and having large and muscular individuals
hovering around them will ensure their safety. This is the farthest from the truth, because close-
protection security is based proven tactics, principles and practices and not presence and behavior.
A nightmare scenario for a celebrity is exiting a location and being surrounded by both fans and
paparazzi in an uncontrolled environment. Security in their attempts to keep the crowd away from the
celebrity will engage in aggressive behavior towards fans and paparazzi to keep them away from the
celebrity. The aggressive behavior exhibited, which may consist of pushing, shoving or shielding the
celebrity from the crowd can lead to confrontation between security and the public. Tactics or actions
like this put the CPP and the celebrity in a dangerous position. The overall problem with this is it can
remove security from their position with the celebrity, thus increasing the vulnerability levels for the
celebrity. Aggressive behavior by the CPP when it could have been avoided can very well result in an
escalated situation that may lead to an assault or injury for the CPP, celebrity or other people. Incidents
like this should not occur and it is up to the CPP to avoid situations where a crowd can surround the
celebrity, thus limiting maneuverability. Training and experience are the most critical tenets for the CPP.
They must anticipate potential threats and dangerous environments before risking exposure in an
attempt to keep the celebrity safe (Holder & Hawley, 1998).
Celebrities come from many different industries, whether music or movies, and each will have a level of
tolerance for navigating in the public domain. Celebrities will also want to participate in the party scene
and will be exposed to drugs, physical altercations, dangerous weapons, intoxicated fans, and overly
aggressive paparazzi. The CPP will be exposed to many dangerous and even criminal environments, in
which some celebrities but not executives, engage because of mutual friends or other reasons. The CPP
must make a decision whether to continue to provide protection, disengage from the celebrity or
attempt to remove the celebrity from a known dangerous environment. The advent of social media
increases the overall risk of the celebrity and the CPP as snapchat and other networking application alert
fans and stalkers alike of the celebrity’s whereabouts. The CPP must use caution when escorting a
celebrity and identify potential dangers before entering a public environment. Past experiences should
drive the CPP when planning security for the celebrity. Previous locations visited, which resulted in
paparazzi and fan attendance should use advance security personnel to assess and prepare the arrival
for the celebrity to reduce the risk of injury to the celebrity and confrontation for the CPP (Oatman,
2006). Often times, celebrities will determine how they enter a location, exit a location or interact with
their fans and paparazzi. The CPP who follows orders and direction from the celebrity without analyzing
the threat and risk levels is contributing to the dangers that can confront them. The principles and
tactics used by protection professionals have been proven to be effective and the CPP must adhere to
them for the safety of all people with or around the celebrity.
3
Myths and Roles and Responsibility of the Close- Protection Professional (CPP)
There are many myths associated with close-protection security and the main one is that the CPP will
take a bullet for the person being protected. This is nonsense, as no federal agent, local law
enforcement or private security professional trained in close-protection swears to “take a bullet” when
assigned to protect a human asset. The main responsibility of the CPP is to remove the celebrity from
the danger zone using a cover and evacuate (C&E) method (Oatman, 2006). The CPP must always focus
on prevention and the avoidance of trouble, rather than combating it. Equally, the CPP must also remain
low-key, calm and rational in many adverse and stressful situations. An effective professional providing
close-protection security must be able to analyze the environment for potential danger before they
enter into it. The CPP must maintain continuous levels of training in order to remain effective as a
protector of the celebrity. The ability to navigate a crisis situation in a calm and professional manner is
attributed to the professionalism, training, experience and advancements in close-protection security
training. Changes to the threat environment because of terrorism, social discord or mental illness
continue to change the landscape for celebrities and it is up to the CPP to meet these security challenges
each and every day. The need of the celebrity to interact with the general public is a constant and will
require a dedicated and intelligent individual to ensure the safety and security of the celebrity at all
times.
Protection strategies must consider threats from criminal groups, fans, and emotionally disturbed
people. Many celebrities, even in the face of known threats and increase risk, continue to interact with
their fan base both domestically and abroad. It is also important the CPP evaluate both the religious and
cultural diversities within the U.S. and across the globe, as actions or just the appearance of the
celebrity can result in increased levels of threat and risk. Anticipating and responding to this type of
threat will be a difficult undertaking and will require comprehensive security and counter surveillance
planning. The celebrity may become a victim of stalking, or an attack from a fan or mentally ill individual,
so the potential danger against the celebrity must be taken seriously. Basic cookie-cutter security
planning for a celebrity is not enough, and it will take analysis and comprehensive assessments of known
and potential threats to ensure an effective security plan. However, overwhelming the celebrity with
convoluted security procedures can equally fail because of frustration on the part of the celebrity to
follow the security protocols. The CPP must provide a safe environment for the celebrity that is not
overly intrusive; overwhelming or hindering; as this can result in confusion and possible conflict
between the celebrity and the CPP (Oatman, 2006).
The CPP must be prepared to explain the security plan to the celebrity and having good communication
skills, manners, intelligence and common sense will equally contribute to a successful close-protection
security strategy. This can help in ensuring the security plan is not only approved, but embraced by the
celebrity. The CPP must remember that human emotions will come into play when formulating
protective security measures; and it is up to the CPP to develop and maintain a professional relationship,
not only with the celebrity, but also with the celebrity’s family. There is no room for error in protection
security as mistakes, redundancy or complacency will surely result in injury, if not death, for both the
celebrity and the CPP. The CPP will be tasked with many requests for services as some may be directly
part of their duties and responsibilities, and some may not. The CPP must communicate the specific
4
responsibilities to the celebrity and alert anyone who requests or instructs that a service or task that is
dangerous or takes the CPP away from performing their primary duties is respectfully refused.
Setting a professional standard early on will ensure the CPP and the celebrity understands what is
expected and what is not tolerated. The CPP can be respectful and professional while maintaining the
primary role as a protection professional. Once this rule is violated and the CPP begins conducting non-
security related tasks the effectiveness of the CPP is reduced to being an aide. This will eventually lead
to confusion and frustration for the CPP and it will reduce the overall security environment for the
celebrity. The CPP must have their hands free at all times and remain disciplined as to not violate this
important rule. Allowing and accommodating the celebrity’s requests for carrying packages or holding
personal items will result in the CPP becoming disengaged and not focused. It is only a matter of time
before a serious incident will occur resulting in injury to the celebrity and the CPP. Though, many would
differ with this position in a real-world environment, it must be understood that the CPP cannot, and
should not, partake in activities or conduct that allows the CPP to not be tactically ready in the event of
an attack (Dale, 2008).
Site Advance
Conducting a comprehensive and effective site advance is a term used to ensure the location the
celebrity will visit is safe; and the necessary security precautions and planning have been conducted.
Site advance is a critical part of close-protection security and will encompass many areas, activities and
locations the celebrity will visit. Arriving at a location prior to the celebrity will ensure that the location is
safe, as well as secured to prevent an attack or incident from occurring. This important responsibility can
help in preventing harm or even embarrass to the celebrity. The advance person must survey the
location for dangerous conditions that could affect the safety of the celebrity and the security team. The
CPP must also coordinate with the host committee representatives to confirm and verify the specific
activities that will take place when the celebrity arrives.
The CPP should request support from security and engineering staff at the location to help with
identifying a primary and secondary access point, internal and external threat information for the
location, infrastructure concerns, and any other important information relating to the location that
could affect the security and safety of the celebrity. The site advance should evaluate the exterior for
large crowds, paparazzi, unusual behavior or dangerous conditions. The arrival area should be clear and
metal barriers used to “contain” the crowd and paparazzi so the celebrity is not surrounded upon exiting
their motorcade. Large uncontrolled crowds can restrict the movement of the celebrity and the security
team, as well as increase the risk of injury to the celebrity. If the crowd or paparazzi will not adhere and
remain behind the barriers, the CPP should consider, not removing the celebrity from the motorcade,
consider using a secondary arrival location away from the crowd, or depart the area all together. The
same applies for a departure, which many times will occur when the public is alerted that a celebrity is
present at a location and they are now staged in front. If the crowd becomes too overwhelming, the
police should be requested for crowd control and alternate departure plans considered to avoid direct
interacting with the crowd. The primary reason for avoiding the crowd is the protection of the celebrity
and the CPP (Dale, 2008).
5
Counter Surveillance
Counter surveillance for the celebrity can be difficult as the celebrity is usually surrounded by fans and
curiosity seekers. The CPP most likely will encounter overzealous fans and possible stalkers. A potential
threat must be identified and precautions taken to ensure the safety of the celebrity. A comprehensive
close-protection security plan must include effective and robust counter surveillance strategies. The
ability of the CPP to identify potential attackers must be a priority of the CPP. When threatening or
harassing information is received, the CPP must conduct a thorough investigation to ensure all
information regarding the individual or group is known; so any security enhancements; if needed; are
conducted. Protection intelligence requires gathering information, including any threatening
communications against the celebrity towards developing a comprehensive background of the person.
This should include a description of the person, any background information, such as mental illness,
criminal history, access to weapons and if they are prone to violence. A recent color photo should be
obtained and shared with the celebrity, their staff and the entire CPP team of the celebrity. The
information should be continuously updated, analyzed and used to direct the necessary security
changes towards addressing the threat and reducing any risks. Threats made to the celebrity should be
forwarded to law enforcement for investigation, and if necessary, possible arrest. It is important that the
CPP advise the celebrity of the seriousness of following all security recommendations to ensure the
highest level of safety and security (Dale, 2008; USDS, 1998).
First-Aid
Administrating first-aid must also be part of the celebrity protection plan. Providing immediate medical
treatment in the event of an attack, medical condition or accident is the responsibility of the CPP. First-
aid planning and training must include CPR, providing direct pressure for trauma injuries and being
aware of medical conditions of the celebrity. The CPP should be certified in first-aid and certification
should be renewed every year. The CPP should be familiar with area hospitals and include in the
motorcade route plans the names and addresses; and if it is a Level-One Trauma center. The CPP should
be familiar with any medicines or medical conditions the celebrity has to advise emergency room
physicians when needed (Oatman, 2006).
Threat Assessment Analysis
A threat assessment has become a valuable tool in the close-protection field. Many governmental
agencies and private security firms use this important tool in calculating risk. Here we learn the
importance of using a threat assessment to identify potential dangers that the celebrity may encounter.
When tasked with developing a threat assessment on the celebrity, the CPP must gather as much
information as possible on the person(s) who may have an interest, motive, intention and more
importantly, the capability of mounting an attack. Gauging the possibility of a potential attack is critical
to the protection of the celebrity and the CPP (USDJ, 2000). The information must include all data and
other sources of information pertaining to the celebrity and his or her family. Open source information,
known threatening communications and paid intelligence services can all help in calculating a
comprehensive threat assessment. Known threateners should be investigated and a records check
6
conducted to include criminal history, mental health, community relations, and social services.
Individual motives related to the behavior of a potential attacker also play a role in the overall threat
assessment process. Unfortunately, there is no one descriptive profile of an attacker. Assassins come in
many shapes, sizes, intelligence and other characteristics. However, an attacker will engage in familiar
behaviors and actions before they attack.
When a person decides to mount an attack on a target, a number of preparatory steps must be taken.
These steps have visual characteristics that can be observed by the CPP. These steps would most likely
include acquiring a weapon, surveying security near the celebrity and the development of an attack and
escape plan. A misconception the CPP can make is to analyze threatening information based on a
presumption that a potential attacker is always mentally ill. Research on known threateners has
disclosed only a small percentage is actually emotionally disturbed. On the contrary, most attackers
chose assassination because it afforded them a way of achieving a goal, or to solve a problem.
Additionally, another myth of a potential attacker is that a threat is made prior to the attack. Though,
many have written letters or made threatening telephone calls, the majority of assassins were not
known or anticipated because they were anonymous until the day they decided to attack (USDJ, 2000).
Close Protection Terminology
Close-protection security uses specific terminology to ensure confidentiality and operational security for
the celebrity, their family and the security team. Exposing specific addresses; names and activities can
be very detrimental to the celebrity and the CPP; as it can alert a potential attacker where the celebrity
is located; the time of arrival; the location; and what activity will take place when the celebrity arrives.
The CPP should utilize “code words” that are changed regularly to ensure that any stalkers, criminals,
hackers or potential attackers cannot obtain sensitive information that could help in executing a
successful attack on the celebrity. These code words can be used for residences, scheduled locations
and activities, as well as motorcade movements on a secured route. The use of checkpoints, which are
described over a security team communication radio, can alert the entire security team of where the
celebrity is in relation to the site and within the motorcade route (Holder & Hawley, 1998).
Attack on the Principal: AOP
It is likely that the celebrity may at some point be the target of an attack, whether by gun, knife, or even
a whipped cream pie. Either way, if the celebrity is attacked, the CPP has failed. The CPP’s ability to
perceive and identify danger will be in question and re-training will be needed. Tactics are available that
many CPP use to combat a threat, but constant vigilance and attitude is equally important. One primary
tactic used is known as the “Arms-Reach” method. The Arms-Reach method means the CPP is always at
“arms-reach” from the celebrity so the CPP can move them from the danger zone when needed. Firstly,
awareness by the CPP that a gun or other weapon has been produced in the presence of the celebrity is
critical. The CPP must now act instantaneously and “Sound Off,” “Cover,” and “Evacuate.” If the attack is
from an object that is thrown, i.e., a brick, an egg, or a liquid, the “Arms Reach” method is used to
remove the celebrity to a safe area or location, such as a room or the motorcade. If the incident is
found only to be a thrown egg and no immediate threat of injury is present, the CPP can allow the
7
celebrity to return to the area where the incident occurred, if deemed to be safe. The use of the “clock
method” to identify the location of a threat is an effective way to determine where the threat is in
relation to the celebrity and the CPP. This successful tactic uses the 12 o’clock position, which consists of
identifying a fixed object on a wall or location. If an attack or weapon is produced, the CPP using the
clock method should identify the threat from its position in the clock. For example, if someone produces
a knife at the three o’clock position, the CPP should cover and evacuate the celebrity towards the 12, 6
or 9 o’clock position if possible. The concept is to remove the celebrity from the threat and out of the
immediate danger zone (USDS, 1998).
Close-Protection Formations
Each situation is determined by environmental circumstances that will either allow or disallow a CPP to
make certain adjustments to a formation. Alternate and contingency plans should also be prepared to
cover such circumstances, as weather, threats, or any other actions that may affect the security of the
celebrity. Security planning is the responsibility of the CPP working with the celebrity. The protective
security team should remain close to the celebrity at all times, because the overall objective is to protect
the celebrity from harm and/or embarrassment. Protecting the celebrity will require utilizing effective
protective formations, which can be used in certain circumstances. The formations being discussed are
all part of a holistic and effective close-protection security strategy to ensure that security personnel are
placed strategically around the person being protected. Protective formations are all part of a structured
security environment that can help circumvent any attempt from someone attempting possible harm. It
must be stated that protective formations are not an absolute; however; it can help in ensuring security
is placed around the celebrity to lower the risk. The following formations are used in close-protection
security today and have proven to be an effective and resilient tool in the overall security plan.
Lone formation utilizes one security person with the celebrity and can be used in both internal and
external movements. The lone formation requires the CPP to stand behind the celebrity at an angle and
not directly behind for better field of view and observation. Known as the number one, this person is
responsible for removing the celebrity from the area when required. In order for the number one to be
effective the CPP must maintain an “arm’s reach” from the celebrity at all times in the event of an
attack. It is important that the CPP remain vigilant and maintain the “arms reach” behind the celebrity at
all times. Unfortunately, this is not always possible because of reluctance of the celebrity to allow the
CPP to be so close. However, allowing too much distance (more than arm’s reach) between the celebrity
and the CPP can result in injury if the person cannot be removed from a dangerous environment quickly
(Dale, 2008).
Another formation utilized is known as the slash or sweep formation, which requires an advance person
to lead the protective formation. This formation requires a two-person security team; one as the
advance, who knows exactly where the team must go, and the number-one who is responsible for the
safety and security of the celebrity. However, human nature will play a role in how the protective
formation is effective when dealing with an attack. Instinct and human reaction many times causes
individuals to engage an attacker when their responsibility may have been to the celebrity. Another
formation is known as the wedge formation, which will require more security personnel and should be
8
used when a higher threat level has been assessed for the celebrity. The use of an advance person, a
number one behind the celebrity and another CPP positioned on the opposite side of the number one
can enhance the overall security environment. This formation is used in public settings where access by
the public is possible.
Close Protection Motorcades and Route Management
A major part of the close-protection security plan is the development of a robust transportation safety
structure. Motorcade and route management is a primary security mechanism for the celebrity’s
security plan. Ensuring that the celebrity and the security team remains safe will require strategic and
critical thinking skills that anticipates danger and ensures the CPP can respond quickly and effectively in
the event of an attack. Motorcades can range from one or more vehicles; and though motorcades sizes
may vary; the fundamentals remain the same. Vehicle transportation is considered vulnerable, because
the CPP team is not in a strategic and ready position. Individuals attempting to photograph or even
harm the celebrity can easily approach the motorcade. This is a dangerous scenario and is up to the CPP
team to remain vigilant and anticipate any and all threats that can occur. Motorcade planning must
ensure that the CPP is trained in evasive driving techniques. There are various independent and
accredited schools that can train the CPP in evasive driving techniques throughout the country. The CPP
driver must operate the vehicle in a safe and responsible manner at all times and only when under
attack should the operator make any evasive moves.
The celebrity is the primary asset in a motorcade and whatever vehicle the celebrity is situated in the
vehicle will be identified as the limo. The celebrity should be situated in the right rear of the limo, as this
is done for on-side arrivals. The CPP must develop secured routes when transporting the celebrity in the
motorcade. The first designated route is known as the primary route, followed by a secondary route and
in certain circumstances a tertiary route may be designated. Multiple routes are needed in the event of
threatening information, an attack, hostile surveillance or a traffic condition. The CPP must observe all
road and environmental conditions and potential problems on a particular route. Challenges and
potential threats include construction, traffic congestion; demonstrations, roadway chock points, as well
as weather and pavement condition. These are just a few of the concerns the CPP must anticipate,
assess and calculate when developing motorcade routes (Dale, 2008). The routes should be determined
based on safety, but also the ability to evacuate and retreat in the event of an attack. Safe locations or
safe havens on the route would include police stations, fire stations, hospitals, government buildings
and even corporate locations that have security positioned in the lobby.
Motorcade Alignment and Vehicle Positioning
The positioning of the motorcade vehicles are critically important and part of a strategic design platform
in close-protection security. The theory of aligning cars is part of a security environment that does not
expose the celebrity unnecessarily and provides tactical positioning for the CPP. After the vehicles have
been inspected and secured they are now ready for alignment and positioning. A motorcade
configuration should include a lead car to pilot the motorcade. The lead car will know the motorcade
routes and act as an advance towards identifying hostile surveillance or a dangerous condition that may
9
affect the motorcade’s movement. The second vehicle in the alignment is known as the limo, which was
previously discussed. The third vehicle in the motorcade is known as the follow vehicle, which will have
additional security personnel who are part of the protection team. They will form a protective formation
around the celebrity once he or she exits the motorcade. This is known as a secured package and it is
also utilized in many diplomatic and executive protection security details. The vehicles should be the
same make, model and color to avoid an attacker or paparazzi from easily identifying the vehicle
carrying the celebrity.
The positioning of the motorcade with the limo in the center also allows the follow-vehicle to become a
replacement vehicle for the celebrity in the event that the limo was to become disabled. Strategies such
as these have been very effective in maintaining a high standard of security for the all types of close-
protection security. Motorcade movement is a critical part of the security plan as the celebrity may
decide to walk or jog on occasion. The motorcade must shadow the celebrity during these moves.
Though, this is not always possible the security team should ensure that routes are determined if
possible prior to any walking moves. Routes for the celebrity when walking should be with the flow of
traffic so the motorcade can proceed and continue to shadow at a close distance. Counter flow is not
recommended as it will cause the motorcade to reposition away from the celebrity, which increases the
overall risk exposure in the event of an incident or attack (Dale, 2008).
Physical Security Concepts and Residential Security
The CPP team will also be responsible for surveying and installing physical security measures around the
celebrity’s residence. Since many attacks especially, kidnapping attempts, occur at a person's residence
providing productive and effective security protection measures will be a necessary component of the
close-protection plan. Implementing physical barriers, such as fencing and motion sensor lighting will
protect the perimeter from a possible intruder. CCTV surveillance cameras should also be installed,
which the CPP, as well as the celebrity can view the property both remotely and while inside the
residence. Additional security measures include a grade 1 or 2 locking mechanism, solid wood doors on
the exterior of the residence, as well as anti-shattering window filming. Interior rooms of the residence
should have intrusion detection sensors on windows and doors, glass break detection and life safety
equipment such as CO2 and smoke detection. Panic room consideration should also be part of the
security survey and rooms within the residence should be identified as potential panic rooms (USDS,
1998).
Attire and Equipment
The CPP must wear appropriate attire that is conducive to the professional environment they are
working in. Like training, professionalism and attitude, having the proper equipment and presenting an
assertive look are important in the overall protection of the celebrity. This section will describe the
equipment needed for the CPP and the clothes that should be worn. When assigned to the protective
security detail, the member needs to obtain certain equipment that will assist in the protection of the
celebrity. Protection equipment will vary from team to team and from environment to environment.
Individuals may feel the need to equip themselves with the necessary items that will do the job at-hand.
10
As a member of the security team, you are on the front lines, not only in regards to an attack, but in the
public’s eye. The message sent will have an impact on the celebrity and the entire team. Personal
appearance is as important as training, and both need to be followed and practiced on a continuous
basis. The following is a guide on the proper dress code for a member of the security team:
Males and Females:
• Single breasted, dark blue, black, or dark gray suits are preferable
• Dark colored sport coat and slacks can also be worn.
• White or light blue shirts with simple color ties
• Slip-on shoes, rubber sole, preferably black
• Golf shirt with khakis, only under non-business occasions
Equipment
Communications:
• Radio with surveillance kit (earpiece),
• Radio holder, pager (if needed),
• Cellular telephone. Smart phone technology is recommended
Flashlight:
• Compact flashlight with extra batteries
• Writing note pad
• Working black ink pen
• Firearm (if authorized) with belt holster and extra magazine clip. Carry permit and other
identification for law enforcement purposes
References
Dale. J., (2008). Introduction to executive protection. (2ed.) NY. CRC Press
Fein, R., Vossekuil, B., (2000) Protective Intelligence and Threat Assessment Investigations U.S.
Department of Justice.
Holder. P.T. & Hawley, D.L., (1998). The executive protection professional’s manual. MA.
Butterworth-Heinemann
Oatman, R., (2006) Executive protection. New Solutions for a New Era. MD. Noble House
United States Department of State: Protection Training Manual (1998). USDS