help Kin303
Article
Connections among physical activity, motivation, and depressive symptoms in adolescent girls
Jose A Cecchini Educational Sciences Department, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
Javier Fernandez-Rio Educational Sciences Department, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
Antonio Mendez-Gimenez Educational Sciences Department, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
Beatriz Sanchez-Martinez Educational Sciences Department, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
Abstract Adolescence can be a difficult period of life characterised, among many other things, by a significant increase in depressive symptoms among girls. Recent studies have suggested that sedentary habits and self-determined motivation can be associated with depressive symptoms. The main goal of the present study was to examine the associations between physical activity levels, sedentary beha- viours, and self-determined motivation and depressive symptoms in girls during adolescence. A total of 714 adolescent girls (16.53 + 1.01 years) agreed to participate in the study. They com- pleted a questionnaire including the scale of depressive symptoms, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and the Situational Motivation Scale. Participants’ smoking habits and body mass index were also assessed. Results showed that those adolescents who performed physical activity of moderate (odds ratio (OR): 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 0.99) or high intensity level (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.21) had a significantly lower probability of suffering from depressive symptoms. Accordingly, the most sedentary group had a higher probability of suffering from depressive symptoms (OR: 4.90; 95% CI: 2.00, 11.54). Vigorous self-determined motivation was also a significant predictor of the lowest levels of depressive symptoms. In conclusion, results
Corresponding author:
Javier Fernandez-Rio, Educational Sciences Department, University of Oviedo, Calle San Francisco, 3, 33003 Oviedo,
Asturias, Spain.
Email: [email protected]
European Physical Education Review 2020, Vol. 26(3) 682–694 ª The Author(s) 2020 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/1356336X20902176 journals.sagepub.com/home/epe
seemed to indicate that educators should promote the most self-determined types of motivation and physical activity habits in their students if they want to help prevent depressive symptoms.
Keywords Depressive symptoms, physical activity, sedentary habits, self-determination, women.
Introduction
Adolescence can be a very difficult period of life characterised by, among many other things, a
significant increase in depressive symptoms (Morgan et al., 2013). A recent review has pointed out
that the prevalence of depression among adolescents and young adults has increased in recent years
(Mojtabai et al., 2016). This increase has been even more prominent among girls (Angold et al.,
2002). To make things worse, most of the adolescents at high risk of depression do not attend
specialised mental health services (Sayal et al., 2014). Depressive symptoms have been connected
to negative consequences such as functional deficiencies (Lyness et al., 2007) and social disorders
(Yayanthi et al., 2015). Adolescents are often exposed to daily life stress (i.e. school, family,
friends, work) and many individuals are not aware of their condition. Some adolescents develop
major health problems such as depression, which some research links to suicide (American Psy-
chological Association, 2016; Beardslee and Knitzer, 2004).
There is ample evidence of the benefits derived from regular leisure-time physical activity
during adolescence (Warburton et al., 2007), which indicates that healthy lifestyle habits should be
promoted among youngsters. Moreover, there is a growing body of research on the association
between physical activity and depression (Adamson et al., 2015; Cecchini et al., 2017; Cecchini-
Estrada et al., 2015; Patrick and Williams, 2012). However, research is scarce in adolescents, and
results have been inconsistent (Dale et al., 2019; Sabiston et al., 2013; Stavrakakis et al., 2013).
Raudsepp and Neissaar (2012), in a study conducted with adolescent girls (12–13 years), found that
increased physical activity was inversely associated with the initial state and the negative changes
in depressive symptoms, and both associations were totally independent of the individuals’ body
mass index. In a recent review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, Bailey et al.
(2016) concluded that physical activity seems to be an encouraging element for adolescents with
depression, but they concluded that more robust research is needed. Moreover, Sabiston et al.
(2013) highlighted the need to examine the intensity and type of physical activity to understand the
connection with depressive symptoms in adolescents. Recently, there has been a call for more
research and moderator analyses to determine the type of physical activity that may produce better
mental health outcomes for youth (Dale et al., 2019).
Self-determination theory has been a major framework for understanding human behaviour
(Deci and Ryan, 1985). The major types of behavioural regulations have been positioned along a
continuum ranging from intrinsic to extrinsic motivation and amotivation (Vallerand, 2001).
Intrinsic motivation is the willingness to perform an activity for the interest, gratification, and
pleasure that the activity provides to the individual. Extrinsic motivation is the disposition to
perform an activity for the external rewards that it can provide. From higher to lower levels of self-
determination, it can be classified in four different types (Vallerand, 2001): (a) integrated: perform
an activity because it is consistent with the individual’s standard of living; (b) identified: perform
an activity showing inner perceptions of causality; (c) introjected: perform an activity to avoid
Cecchini et al. 683
feelings of culpability and strengthen personal ego; and (d) external: perform an activity to obtain a
compensation or avoid a penalty. Finally, amotivation is the lack of motivation for doing an
activity. Within this theory, three basic psychological needs have been considered fundamental for
‘optimal motivated behaviour and psychological well-being’ (Vlachopoulos et al., 2011: 264): (a)
autonomy: seeing one’s behaviour as self-endorsed; (b) competence: feelings of operative inter-
action with the context; and (c) relatedness: feelings of effective association with others (Niemec
and Ryan, 2009). Over the past 15 years, a growing body of research has showed interest in the
connection between self-determination theory of motivation and health. The results of these
studies have shown the positive impact of autonomy support and self-regulation (self-determined
motivation) on a variety of mental and physical health problems, including depression (Patrick and
Williams, 2012) and depressive symptoms (Cecchini et al., 2017; Cecchini-Estrada et al., 2015).
Nevertheless, more research is needed to understand the connection between the different types of
motivation and these negative health problems in adolescent girls.
The main goal of this study was to examine the associations between physical activity levels,
sedentary behaviours, and self-determined motivation and depressive symptoms in girls during
adolescence (aged 15–18). A second goal was to assess the association between adolescents’ self-
determined motivation and their depressive symptoms. The first hypothesis was that there will be a
negative connection between physical activity levels and depressive symptoms. The second
hypothesis was that there will be a negative link between autonomous regulation and depressive
symptoms.
Method
Participants
A total of 714 adolescent girls (aged 15–18; mean 16.53 + 1.01 years) agreed to participate in the study. They were enrolled in different secondary schools located in northern Spain. An informed
written consent form was signed by all participants or their parents/tutors. The research design
complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocols were approved by the ethics com-
mittee of the researchers’ university. Participants were informed that they could withdraw from the
study at any time, and that their responses were going to be treated confidentially. They were asked
to answer honestly when completing different questionnaires, and informed that their responses
would not affect their school grades.
Instruments
Depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the six-item scale of depressive symptoms validated by Kandel and Davies (1982). The psychometric properties of this instrument
have been reviewed (Sabiston et al., 2013). In the present study, the Cronbach’s alpha obtained was
.72, which can be considered satisfactory (Vincent, 2005). Following Hambleton et al. (2005),
every item of the scale was translated into Spanish by a professional, and then again into English to
examine its correspondence with the original. Participants answered the question: ‘During the past
12 months, how often have you . . . ’ in a four-point Likert scale ranging from one: ‘never’ to four: ‘often’ (e.g. ‘felt too tired to do things’). Self-reported depressive symptoms are considered the
strongest predictive measure for the appearance of major depressive disorders in youngsters
(Kovacs and Lopez-Duran, 2010). Therefore, it is considered a reliable instrument. To provide a
depressive symptomatology mark, all responses were added. Following Choi et al. (1971) the score
684 European Physical Education Review 26(3)
was increased in 10 points, to produce a range between 16 and 34 points, and the results were used
to provide participants’ depressive symptomatology. Choi et al. (1997: 43) considered ‘adolescents
who achieve a score of 29 or greater as having notable depressive symptoms’. Therefore, the same
cutoff score was used in this study.
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (Booth, 2000) was designed to measure physical activity and inactivity at a cross-national
level. The IPAQ has shown reasonable measurement properties for the analysis of physical activity
levels of individuals between 15 and 65 years of age (Hagstro€mer et al., 2006). In this study, the short version ‘seven-day recall’ was used (Craig et al., 2003). The Spanish validated version was
obtained from www.ipaq.ki.se. It provides information on the time the individual spends in three
physical activity intensity levels (walking, moderate, and vigorous), and in sedentary activities.
The Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) was used to indicate physical activity intensity. It
represents 3.5 mlO2/kg.min –1
(energy needed for the basal metabolic rate), and it was grouped in
three levels: (a) light (< 3 METs); (b) moderate (3–5.9 METs); and (c) high (> 6 METs) (Ainsworth
et al., 2000). MET-minutes were calculated by multiplying the number of Met-minutes/week
(minutes performing physical activity at a certain intensity level). Finally, MET-minute/week was
also calculated for data analyses.
The Situational Motivation Scale. The Spanish validated version (Martin-Albó et al., 2009) of the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) (Guay et al., 2000) was used in the present study. It was
designed to assess situational (state) motivation towards an activity. Participants answered the
question: ‘Why are you engaged in physical activity’ to each one of the three intensity levels
measured by the IPAQ: walking, moderate, and vigorous, independently. The instrument measured
intrinsic motivation (i.e. ‘Because I think that this activity is interesting’), identified regulation (i.e.
‘Because I am doing it for my own good’), external regulation (i.e. ‘Because I am supposed to do
it’), and amotivation (i.e. ‘There may be good reasons to do this activity, but personally I don’t see
any’). Each one of these subscales contained four items. Every item was rated on a seven-point
Likert scale from one (does not correspond at all) to seven (corresponds exactly). Since the sub-
scales of the SIMS assess types of motivation of the entire range of the self-determination con-
tinuum, a self-determined index (SDI) can be calculated (Lonsdale et al., 2009). Some criticisms
have been raised about how this index has been calculated (Chemolli and Gagné, 2014; Ünlü,
2016); therefore, in this study, following Lemyre et al. (2006), the SDI was obtained by multi-
plying each subscale by a factor that represents the position of each construct on the previously
mentioned self-determination continuum (SDI ¼ 2 * intrinsic motivation þ identified regulation – external regulation – 2 * amotivation). Based on the participants’ responses to each of the three
intensity levels measured using the IPAQ (walking, moderate, and vigorous), and following
procedures previously and successfully tested (Cecchini et al., 2017: 604): ‘Three independent
SDIs were calculated (SDIWalking, SDIModerate, and SDIVigorous) to try to explain why people
are currently engaged in one type of physical activity (walking, moderate PA [physical activity],
and vigorous PA). High scores meant high levels of autonomous motivation’. The goal was to
assess participants’ self-determined motivation towards three different levels of physical activity:
vigorous, moderate, and walking.
Anthropometry. Following standardised recommendations (Kushner et al., 1996), participants were measured twice with a five-minute interval between scores. Weight and body mass index were
Cecchini et al. 685
obtained using a calibrated digital scale (SECA Model 861; Vogel and Halke, Hamburg, Germany,
precision ¼ 100g, range ¼ 0–150kg). Students wore no shoes when measured. Height was eval- uated using a wall-mounted stadiometer (SECA Model 222; Vogel and Halke, Hamburg, Ger-
many, precision ¼ 0.1cm, range ¼ 6–230cm): children stood straight against the wall with no shoes on to align the spine with the instrument; the head was positioned with the chin parallel to the
floor. The mean of the two measurements of weight and height was used to calculate each par-
ticipant’s body mass index: weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in metres
(BMI: kg / m 2 ). Again, following standardised recommendations (Dinsdale et al., 2011: 3), scores
obtained were used to classify participants according to ‘a specific z score, or centile, on a child
growth reference’. In this case, the Spanish population 0–18 years described in the Bilbao study
was used (Fernandez et al., 2011).
Smoking habits. Participants’ smoking habits were assessed through a question included in the final questionnaire used. A dichotomous response (yes/no) was selected to obtain the information.
Statistical analyses
First, descriptive statistics were obtained from all the variables under study: means, standard
deviation, and percentages where needed. Second, binary logistic regression analyses were per-
formed to examine the associations of MET-minutes/week and sedentary time with depressive
symptoms. The results are presented adjusted by age, smoking, and body mass index (Model 1) and
fully fitted (age, smoking, body mass index, and SDI; Model 2), and they are reported as odds ratio
(OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the p value for the linear trend.
Results
Participants’ characteristics
Most of the participants (82.8%) had a normal body mass index (M ¼ 23.01, SD ¼ 9.73), but 17.2% were considered obese or overweight. Notable depressive symptoms were present in 15.7% of the participants (no significant difference was found based on age). 21.4% of them were considered obese or overweight (only 15.3% among individuals not having notable depressive symptoms), 32.1% were smokers, they had lower MET scores in all the different categories (vigorous, mod- erate, walking), and in SDI vigorous, moderate, and sedentary. At the bivariate level, participants
with this symptomatology showed statistically significant differences in the previously mentioned
demographic and behavioural characteristics compared with those who reported no significant
depressive symptoms (Table 1).
Associations between MET-minutes/week and depressive symptoms
Both Model 1 and Model 2 showed significant linear trends in depressive symptoms among the
different levels of MET-minutes/week (Table 2). In the fully adjusted model, the association was
significant: participants at level three of MET-minutes/week (high) were 4.5 times less likely to
report from depressive symptoms than participants at level one (low). Similarly, SDIVigorous was
a significant predictor of lower levels of depressive symptoms.
686 European Physical Education Review 26(3)
Associations between sedentary time, SDI, and depressive symptoms
Model 1 showed a significant linear trend between sedentary time and depressive symptoms: p <
.001 (Tables 2 and 3): participants who spent 11 or more hours/day performing sedentary activities
were almost 5.1 times more likely to report depressive symptoms than participants who spent less
than 4 hours/day. In the fully fitted model, this association was just slightly lower (4.9 times). In
Model 2, SDIVigorous was also a significant predictor of lower levels of depressive symptoms.
Discussion
The main goal of this study was to examine the associations between physical activity levels,
sedentary behaviours, and self-determined motivation and depressive symptoms in girls during
adolescence (15–18 years). Results showed that participants at level three of MET-minutes/week
(high physical activity levels) were 4.5 times less likely to report from depressive symptoms than
Table 1. Participants’ demographic, behavioural and health characteristics.
Global (n ¼ 714)
Depressive symptoms* (n ¼ 112)
No depressive symptoms (n ¼ 602) p**
Age 15 169 (23.7) 20 (17.9) 149 (24.8) 16 172 (24.1) 25 (22.3) 147 (24.4) 17 199 (27.9) 32 (28.6) 167 (27.7) 18 174 (24.4) 35 (31.3) 139 (23.1) .20
Smoking Yes 166 (23.2) 36 (32.1) 130 (21.6) .03
Body mass indexa
Normal 591 (82.8) 87 (77.7) 504 (83.7) Overweight 107 (15.0) 20 (17.9) 87 (14.5) Obese 16 (2.2) 5 (4.5) 11 (1.8) .13
METsb
Vigorous 1666.76 (1893.94) 725.01 (1095.24) 1839.40 (1958.26) <.001 Moderate 356.72 (635.35) 224.28 (364.24) 381.36 (671.20) <.001 Walking 1119.72 (1257.59) 892.03 (1051.61) 1162.08 (1288.63) .02 Total 3148.80 (2544.90) 1854.15 (1789.56) 3386.15 (2592.08) <.001
SDI Vigorous 11.54 (3.84) 9.50 (3.99) 11.80 (3.75) <.001 Moderate 10.12 (4.61) 8.78 (4.38) 10.32 (4.62) .03 Walking 5.41 (5.59) 4.65 (5.20) 5.55 (5.65) .11
Sedentary 7.17 (2.91) 8.39 (3.17) 6.91 (2.79) <.001
Note. N (%) or mean (SD).
MET: Metabolic Equivalent of Task
*Students who achieved a score of 29 or higher were defined as having notable depressive symptoms.
**p difference between participants with and without depressive symptoms (in weighted analyses with linearised variance
estimation). a Normal < 25 kg.m
–2 ; Overweight ¼ 25–29.9 kg.m–2; Obese � 30 kg.m–2).
b Vigorous MET-minutes/week ¼ 8.0; moderate MET-minutes/week ¼ 4.0; walking MET-minutes/week ¼ 3.3; total ¼ walking þ moderate þ vigorous MET-minutes/week.
Cecchini et al. 687
participants at level one (low physical activity levels). A second goal was to assess the association
between adolescents’ self-determined motivation and their depressive symptoms. Results showed
that SDIVigorous was also a significant predictor of lower levels of depressive symptoms.
The first hypothesis was that there will be a negative connection between physical activity
levels and depressive symptoms, and the results confirm this hypothesis. The group of adolescent
girls who showed notable depressive symptoms had significantly lower MET scores in all the
different categories (vigorous, moderate, walking). Moreover, a strong association between MET-
minutes/week and depressive symptoms (after controlling for relevant confounding variables
such as age, smoking habits, and body mass index) was found in the present study. Interestingly, a
decreased probability of suffering from depressive symptoms was observed even at moderate
levels of physical activity. Results from the present study also provided evidence of a positive
association between sedentary time and depressive symptoms in adolescent girls (age range
15–18 years). In this case, the highest probability of suffering from depressive symptoms was
Table 2. Adjusted odds of depressive symptoms across MET-minutes/week and sedentary time.
Model 1a Model 2b
Depressive symptoms Depressive symptoms
No Yes OR (95% CI) No Yes OR (95% CI)
MET-minutes/week 1 Low 54 30 1.00 54 30 1.00 2 Moderate 260 64 .43 (.25, .73)** 260 64 .55 (.31, .99)* 3 High 286 18 .12 (.06, .24)*** 286 18 .22 (.10, .21)***
Age 15 1.00 1.00 16 1.13 (.59, 2.18) 1.09 (.56, 2.11) 17 1.29 (.69, 2.64) 1.24 (.66, 2.33) 18 1.42 (.76, 2.65) 1.47 (.78, 2.74)
Smoking Yes 1.49 (.94, 2.37) 1.45 (.90, 2.33)
Body mass indexb
Normal 1.00 1.00 Overweight 1.28 (.72, 2.26) 1,27 (.71, 2.47) Obese 2.13 (.69, 6.55) 2.23 (.70, 7.01)
SDI Vigorous – .95 (.91, .99)* Moderate – .99 (.96, 1.04) Walking – .97 (.93, 1.01) P p < .001 p < .01
MET: Metabolic Equivalent of Task; OD: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Low: lowest level of physical activity (individuals
who did not meet criteria for categories 2 or 3 were considered low/inactive). Moderate: minimum of at least 600 MET-
min/week. High: minimum of 3000 MET-min/week a Model 1: odds ratios were adjusted for age, smoking and body mass index.
b Model 2: odds ratios were adjusted for age, smoking, body mass index, vigorous self-determined index (SDI), moderate
SDI, walking SDI, and sedentary time or MET-minutes/week.
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001 for association with depression.
688 European Physical Education Review 26(3)
observed in the group of 11 or more hours/day of sedentary time. There exists some evidence of the
positive impact of physical activity on depressive symptoms in the general population (Adamson
et al., 2015; Teychenne et al., 2008), in adolescents (Dale et al., 2019; Pastor et al., 2003; Skrove
et al., 2013), and in college students (Cecchini et al., 2017). The same association between indi-
viduals’ sedentary time and depressive symptoms was also observed in previous studies (Ussher
et al., 2007). In all participants, higher levels of physical activity (vigorous) were inversely
associated with the initial state and the negative changes experienced in depressive symptoms.
However, results from the present study expand the benefits of physical activity to include
moderate physical activity, and even walking. Previous studies have found physical activity to be
an encouraging element for adolescents with depression (Bailey et al., 2016; Nyström et al., 2015).
Moreover, there has been a call for more research and moderator analyses to determine the type of
physical activity that may produce better mental health outcomes for youth (Dale et al., 2019), and
Table 3. Adjusted odds of depressive symptoms across sedentary time.
Model 1a Model 2b
Depressive symptoms Depressive symptoms
No Yes OR (95% CI) No Yes OR (95% CI)
Sedentary time 1 (< 4 hours/day) 76 12 1 (referent) 76 12 1 (referent) 2 (4–8 hours/day) 204 22 .69 (.32, 1.48) 204 22 .81 (.37, 1.79) 3 (8–11 hours/day) 220 52 1.52 (.76, 3.07) 220 52 1.67 (.81, 3.46) 4 (> 11 hours/day) 36 26 5.13 (2.26, 11.63)*** 36 26 4.90 (2.0, 11.54)***
Age 15 1 1 16 1.51 (.78, 2.93) 1.44 (.73, 2.86) 17 1.60 (.85, 3.00) 1.45 (.76, 2.79) 18 1.85 (.99, 3.44) 1.84 (.97, 3.49)
Smoking Yes 1.81 (1.13, 2.89)* 1.54 (.94, 2.53)
Body mass indexb
Normal 1 1 Overweight 1.24 (.70, 2.20) 1,14 (.63, 2.06) Obese 2.84 (.93, 8.68) 2.54 (.79, 8.17)
SDI Vigorous – .91 (.87, .95)*** Moderate – .98 (.94, 1.03) Walking – .97 (.93, 1.01)
p < .001 p < .01
OD: odds ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; Low: lowest level of physical activity; individuals who did not meet criteria for
categories 2 or 3 were considered low/inactive. Moderate: minimum of at least 600 MET-min/week. High: minimum of 3000
MET-min/week. a Model 1: odds ratios were adjusted for age, smoking, and body mass index. b Model 2: odds ratios were adjusted for age, smoking, body mass index, vigorous SDI, moderate SDI, walking SDI, and
sedentary time or Metabolic Equivalent of Task-minutes/week. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001 for association with
depression.
Cecchini et al. 689
results from the present study showed that it is significantly associated with depressive symptoms
at all intensity levels. In a recent cross-sectional study conducted on adolescents, Halliday et al.
(2019) found that the strong association between mental health and physical activity did not
significantly vary according to gender. It was just a matter of quantity of physical activity, and girls
reported less physical activity than boys and, consequently, poorer mental health. Results from the
present study showed the associations between physical activity an adolescent girls’ depressive
symptoms even at low intensity levels. In the present study, the strong connection between MET-
minutes/week and depressive symptoms was present, even after controlling for other relevant
confounding variables such as age, smoking habits, and body mass index. Regarding body mass
index, previous studies have shown that the association between physical activity and depressive
symptoms was totally independent of the individuals’ body mass index (Raudsepp and Neissaar,
2012), and results from the present study have confirmed it. Therefore, physical activity (or
inactivity) could be considered a stronger predictor of depressive symptoms than the individuals’
body mass index, and it should be promoted by teachers and health educators.
The second hypothesis was that there will be a negative association between autonomous
regulation and depressive symptoms and results confirmed this connection. Higher SDI levels
(vigorous and moderate) were significantly lower in individuals with notable depressive symp-
toms, while in individuals with lower SDI (walking) the depressive symptoms were significantly
higher. Moreover, binary logistic regression analyses showed that SDIVigorous significantly
predicted lower depressive symptoms in both tested models. High levels of SDI were associated
with low levels of depression. Therefore, individuals’ degree of self-determined motivation has
been associated to depressive symptoms. Previous studies have shown the positive impact of
autonomy support and self-regulation (self-determined motivation) on a variety of mental and
physical health problems, including depression (Patrick and Williams, 2012) and depressive
symptoms (Cecchini et al., 2017, 2019; Cecchini-Estrada et al., 2015). Similarly, participants’
perceived autonomy support and autonomous motivation while enrolled in a treatment programme
were powerful predictors of treatment outcome (Kaap-Deeder et al., 2014). Therefore, the results
seem to indicate that self-determined motivation (self-regulation) could be a positive factor
influencing depression and depressive symptoms, which is consistent with self-determination
theory: when individuals’ behaviour is self-determined, the regulatory process includes choice,
and when it is controlled, it includes compliance (Deci and Ryan, 2000). Consequently, physical
and health educators should try to promote self-determined motivation among their adolescent
students. Nevertheless, more research is needed to be able to establish a true cause and effect
between this type of motivation and depressive symptoms.
To our knowledge, this study is the first one to examine the associations among physical
activity, self-determined motivation, and sedentary time with depressive symptoms in adolescent
girls (aged 15–18). These connections have been previously observed in only one study conducted
in college students (Cecchini et al., 2017). In a large sample of university students, self-determined
motivation predicted the intensity of physical activity, which, in turn, predicted depressive
symptoms. The same connection has been observed in the present study, showing that individuals’
self-regulated behaviours and physical activity levels have been associated to depressive
symptoms.
The main finding of this study was the strong association between MET-minutes/week (even at
moderate levels) and depressive symptoms, regardless of confounding factors such as age,
smoking habits, and body mass index. Primary and secondary health and physical educators
should promote the most self-determined types of motivation (i.e. intrinsic motivation, identified
690 European Physical Education Review 26(3)
regulation), as well as physical activity habits in their students, to avoid the development of
depressive symptoms in the early stages of their life.
The study has some limitations. First, the number of participants could limit the ability to
generalise the results. Similar research works should be conducted in larger samples of adolescent
girls to confirm the results. Second, the study was conducted on adolescent females only. Other
studies should also be conducted in adolescent males to be able to compare the results and obtain a
wider view of the problem, regardless of gender. Third, the study followed a cross-sectional
research design. Intervention studies should be conducted to find out if the links found in this
study can be reinforced or changed. Finally, the present study cannot establish cause and effect.
More research is needed to understand the different factors that contribute to individuals’ moti-
vation, and, indirectly, to depressive symptoms.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or pub-
lication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iD
Javier Fernandez-Rio https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-3723
References
Adamson BC, Ensari I and Motl RW (2015) The effect of exercise on depressive symptoms in adults with
neurological disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Reha-
bilitation 96(7): 1329–1338.
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al (2000) Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity
codes and MET intensities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 32(9; SUPP/1): S498–S504.
American Psychological Association (2016) Depression. Available at: www.apa.org/topics/depress/.
(accessed 13 February 2019)
Angold A, Erkanli A, Silberg J, et al. (2002) Depression scale scores in 8–17-year-olds: Effects of age and
gender. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 43: 1052–1063.
Bailey AP, Hetrick SE, Rosenbaum S, et al. (2016) Treating depression with physical activity in adolescents
and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Psychological
Medicine 48(7): 1068–1083.
Beardslee WR and Knitzer J (2004) Mental health services: A family systems approach. In: Maton K,
Shellenbach C, Leadbeater B, et al. (eds) Investing in Children, Youth, Families, and Communities:
Strengths-based Research and Policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 147–183.
Booth ML (2000) Assessment of physical activity: An international perspective. Research Quarterly for
Exercise and Sport 71(2): 114–120.
Cecchini JA, Fernandez-Rio J, Méndez-Giménez A, et al. (2017) A self-determination approach to the
understanding of the impact of physical activity on depressive symptoms. Stress and Health 33(5):
600–607.
Cecchini JA, Fernandez-Rio J, Méndez-Giménez A and (2019) Physical Activity, Approach-Avoidance
Temperament and Depressive Symptoms. Kinesiology 51: 60–69. doi: 10.26582/k.51.1.13
Cecchini-Estrada JA, Méndez-Giménez A, Cecchini C, et al. (2015) Exercise and Epstein’s TARGET for
treatment of depressive symptoms: A randomized study. International Journal of Clinical and Health
Psychology 15(3): 191–199.
Cecchini et al. 691
Chemolli E and Gagné M (2014) Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures
derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment 26(2): 575–585.
Choi WS, Patten CA, Gillin JC, et al. (1997) Cigarette smoking predicts development of depressive symptoms
among US adolescents. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 19(1): 42–50.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. (2003) The IPAQ Consensus Group and the IPAQ Reliability and
Validity Study Group. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): 12-country reliability and
validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 35: 1381–1395.
Dale LP, Vanderloo L, Moore S, et al. (2019) Physical activity and depression, anxiety, and self-esteem in
children and youth: An umbrella systematic review. Mental Health and Physical Activity 16: 66–70. doi:
10.1016/j.mhpa.2018.12.001
Deci EL and Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York:
Plenum.
Deci EL and Ryan RM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-
determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268.
Dinsdale H, Ridler C and Ells L (2011) A Simple Guide to Classifying Body Mass Index in Children. London:
National Obesity Observatory (National Health Service).
Fernandez C, Lorenzo H, Vrotsou K, et al. (2011) Estudio de crecimiento de Bilbao [Bilbao growth study].
Bilbao: Fundación Faustino Orbegozo Eizaguirre.
Guay F, Vallerand RJ and Blanchard C (2000) On the assessment of the situational intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion 24(3): 175–213.
Hagstro€mer M, Oja P and Sjostrom M (2006) The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): A study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutrition 9(6): 755–762.
Halliday AJ, Kern ML and Turbull DA (2019) Can physical activity help explain the gender gap in adolescent
mental health? A cross-sectional exploration. Mental Health and Physical Activity 16: 8–18. doi: 10.1016/
j.mhpa.2019.02.003
Hambleton R, Merenda P and Spielberger C (2005) Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-
cultural Assessment. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.
Kaap-Deeder J, Vansteenkiste M, Soenens B, et al. (2014) Fostering self-endorsed motivation to change in
patients with an eating disorder: The role of perceived autonomy support and psychological need satisfac-
tion. International Journal of Eating Disorders 16(2): 156–163.
Kandel DB and Davies M (1982) Epidemiology of depressive mood in adolescents: An empirical study.
Archives of General Psychiatry 39: 1205–1212.
Kovacs M and Lopez-Duran N (2010) Prodromal symptoms and atypical affectivity as predictors of major
depression in juveniles: Implications for prevention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51(4):
472–496.
Kushner RF, Gudivaka R and Schoeller DA (1996) Clinical characteristics influencing bioelectrical impe-
dance analysis measurements. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 64(3): 423–427.
Lemyre NP, Treasure DC and Roberts GC (2006) Influence of variability in motivation and affect on elite
athlete burnout susceptibility. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 28(1): 32–48. doi: 10.1123/jsep.
28.1.32
Lonsdale C, Sabiston CM, Raedeke TD, et al. (2009) Self-determined motivation and students’ physical
activity during structured physical education lessons and free choice periods. Preventive Medicine 48(1):
69–73.
Lyness JM, Kim J, Tang W, et al. (2007) The clinical significance of subsyndromal depression in older
primary care patients. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 15(3): 214–223.
Martin-Albó J, Nuñez JL and Navarro JG (2009) Validation of the Situational Motivation Scale (EMSI) in the
educational context. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 12(2): 799–807.
Morgan JK, Olino TM, McMakin DL, et al. (2013) Neural response to reward as a predictor of increases
in depressive symptoms in adolescence. Neurobiology of Disease 52: 66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.
03.039
692 European Physical Education Review 26(3)
Mojtabai R, Olfson M and Han B (2016) National trends in the prevalence and treatment of depression in
adolescents and young adults. Pediatrics 138(6): e2 0161878. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1878
Niemec CP and Ryan RM (2009) Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-
determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education 7(2): 133–144.
Nyström MB, Neely G, Hassmén P, et al. (2015) Treating major depression with physical activity: A
systematic overview with recommendations. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 44(4): 341–352.
Pastor Y, Balaguer I, Pons D, et al. (2003) Testing direct and indirect effects of sports participation on
perceived health in Spanish adolescents between 15-18 years of age. Journal of Adolescence 26(6):
717–730. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.07.001
Patrick H and Williams GC (2012) Self-determination theory: Its application to health behaviour and com-
plementarity with motivational interviewing. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical
Activity 9: 68–82. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-18
Raudsepp L and Neissaar I (2012) Relationships between physical activity and depressive symptoms
in adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence 35(5): 1399–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.
04.003
Sabiston CM, O’Loughlin E, Brunet J, et al. (2013) Linking depression symptom trajectories in adolescence
to physical activity and team sports participation in young adults. Preventive Medicine 56(2): 95–98. doi:
10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.11.013
Sayal K, Yates N, Spears M, et al. (2014) Service use in adolescents at risk of depression and self-
harm: Prospective longitudinal study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 49(8):
1231–1240.
Skrove M, Romundstad P and Indredavik MS (2013) Resilience, lifestyle and symptoms of anxiety and
depression in adolescence: The Young-HUNT study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
48(3): 407–416.
Stavrakakis N, Roest AM, Verhulst F, et al. (2013) Physical activity and onset of depression in adolescents: A
prospective study in the general population cohort TRAILS. Journal of Psychiatric Research 47(10):
1304–1308. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.06.005
Teychenne M, Ball K and Salmon J (2008) Physical activity and likelihood of depression in adults: A review.
Preventive Medicine 46(5): 397–411. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.009
Ussher MH, Owen CG, Cook DG, et al. (2007) The relationship between physical activity, sedentary beha-
viour and psychological wellbeing among adolescents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
42(10): 851–856.
Ünlü A (2016) Adjusting potentially confounded scoring protocols for motivation aggregation in organismic
integration theory: An exemplification with the relative autonomy or self-determination index. Frontiers
in Psychology 7: 272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00272
Vallerand RJ (2001) A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In:
Roberts GC (ed.) Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 263–319.
Vincent WJ (2005) Statistics in Kinesiology. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Vlachopoulos SP, Katartzi ES and Kontou MG (2011) The basic psychological needs in physical education
scale. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 30(3): 263–280. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.30.3.263
Warburton DER, Nicol CW and Bredin SSD (2007) Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence
(review). Canadian Medical Association Journal 17(6): 801–809. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351
Yayanthi P, Thirunavukarasu M and Rajkumar R (2015) Academic stress and depression among adolescents:
A cross-sectional study. Indian Pediatrics 52(15): 217–219.
Author biographies
Jose A. Cecchini, Professor, is the leading researcher of EDAFIDES research group. His areas of research
include motivation and health in physical activity.
Cecchini et al. 693
Javier Fernandez-Rio, Associate Professor, is a member of EDAFIDES research group. His areas of
research include pedagogical models and motivation in physical education.
Antonio Mendez-Gimenez, Associate Professor, is a member of EDAFIDES research group. His areas of
research include motivation and pedagogical models in sport.
Beatriz Sanchez-Martinez, Assisstant Professor, is a member of EDAFIDES research group. Her arwas of
research include motivation and body expression in physical education.
694 European Physical Education Review 26(3)
<< /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Gray Gamma 2.2) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Warning /CompatibilityLevel 1.3 /CompressObjects /Off /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages false /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.1000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams true /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness false /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments false /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Remove /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages false /ColorImageMinResolution 266 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Average /ColorImageResolution 175 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages false /GrayImageMinResolution 266 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Average /GrayImageResolution 175 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages false /MonoImageMinResolution 900 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Average /MonoImageResolution 175 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox false /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier (CGATS TR 001) /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /Unknown /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ENU <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> >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AllowImageBreaks true /AllowTableBreaks true /ExpandPage false /HonorBaseURL true /HonorRolloverEffect false /IgnoreHTMLPageBreaks false /IncludeHeaderFooter false /MarginOffset [ 0 0 0 0 ] /MetadataAuthor () /MetadataKeywords () /MetadataSubject () /MetadataTitle () /MetricPageSize [ 0 0 ] /MetricUnit /inch /MobileCompatible 0 /Namespace [ (Adobe) (GoLive) (8.0) ] /OpenZoomToHTMLFontSize false /PageOrientation /Portrait /RemoveBackground false /ShrinkContent true /TreatColorsAs /MainMonitorColors /UseEmbeddedProfiles false /UseHTMLTitleAsMetadata true >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /BleedOffset [ 9 9 9 9 ] /ConvertColors /ConvertToRGB /DestinationProfileName (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /DestinationProfileSelector /UseName /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /ClipComplexRegions true /ConvertStrokesToOutlines false /ConvertTextToOutlines false /GradientResolution 300 /LineArtTextResolution 1200 /PresetName ([High Resolution]) /PresetSelector /HighResolution /RasterVectorBalance 1 >> /FormElements true /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles true /MarksOffset 9 /MarksWeight 0.125000 /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PageMarksFile /RomanDefault /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [288 288] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice