TWO DIFFERENT RUBRIC IN ONE CASE EACH RUBRIC ANSWER IN ONE FILE
l1adl
CaseWrittenAssignmentInstruction.pdf
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
WRITTEN INSTRUCTION
Case Written Assignment
1. Written Assignment: Ethical Position Paper 2. Written Assignment: Ethical Decision-Making Paper
Using the Assigned Case:
1. This assessment requires you to critically examine the case scenario you selected or assigned to you and examine the different attributes and practices of the role of interdisciplinary professional ethics.
2. Answer the questions found at the end of each case and you may use the guided questions in the question no.3.a.
3. Format of Paper: a. This assignment requires you to develop a formal essay style that includes a body and
conclusion. You need to use a formal introduction, body, and conclusion. Below is your guided questions.
i. knowing the evidences of the case, ii. recognize the ethical issues,
iii. how do the various principles of ethical will apply into the arguments, iv. present and defend when you decide your judgement which determine the
ethically best option of your choice, and v. what is your recommended course of action (Plan)
b. Your assignment should be written in APA style and prepared as follows: i. Has a cover sheet with the Case title, Your Complete Name, Student ID Number
and the name of the teacher. ii. Use font, such as Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman; minimum font size 12
iii. Use the APA style referencing. All in-text references must include page numbers, which is a must. Use the link provided to learn how to cite sources: https://www.citethisforme.com/ or any available site.
4. Check and compare with the Assessment Task Rubric of both Written Assignment (Ethical Position Paper and Ethical Decision-Making Paper) on how you will be graded accordingly.
MY Case
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523) Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment
Page 4 of 10
Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017
Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018
Student Name:
Student ID:
Date:
Overall Grade:
Assessment Rubric:
ITEM POOR (0.0)
ACCEPTABLE (1.0)
IDEAL (2.0)
CLO STUDENT’S GRADE
1) Clarification of the ethical issue.
Did not clarify the ethical issue.
Partially clarified the ethical issue
Comprehensively clarified the ethical issue
1.1
2) Re-framing of the ethical issue as an ethical question.
Failed to re- frame the ethical issue into an ethical question.
Re-framed the ethical issue into a vague ethical question.
Re-framed the ethical issue into a clear and well- defined ethical question.
1.1
3) Utilization of practice and/or research based literature to explore different perspectives on the issue.
Did not utilize practice and/or research based literature to explore different perspectives on the issue.
Utilized either practice or research based literature to explore different perspectives on the issue.
Utilized both practice and research based literature to explore different perspectives on the issue.
1.2 and 1.3
4) Articulation of position on the issue on the basis of personal values.
Failed to articulate position on the issue based on any personal values.
Articulated position on the issue based on a single personal value.
Articulated position on the issue based on at least two personal values.
1.2
5) Referencing of personal value position to relevant ethical
Did not reference personal value position to any relevant ethical
Referenced personal value position to a single relevant ethical
Referenced personal value position to at least two relevant ethical principles or codes.
1.2
Assessment Task Assessment Score □ Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment 20%
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523) Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment
Page 5 of 10
Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017
Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018
principles of codes.
principle or code.
principle or code.
6) Articulation of position on the issue on the basis of professional values.
Failed to articulate position on the issue based on any professional values.
Articulated position on the issue based on a single professional value.
Articulated position on the issue based on at least two professional values.
1.3
7) Referencing of professional position to relevant ethical principles of codes.
Did not reference personal value position to any relevant ethical principle or code.
Referenced personal value position to a single relevant ethical principle or code.
Referenced personal value position to at least two relevant ethical principles or codes.
1.3
8) Discussion of potential challenges for practice.
Failed to discuss any potential challenges for practice.
Discussed a single potential challenge for practice.
Discussed at least two potential challenges for practice.
2.2
9) Composition of a well- structured, and grammatically correct ethical position paper.
Composed a poorly structured ethical position paper with numerous grammatical errors.
Composed a fairly- structured ethical position paper with some grammatical errors.
Composed a well- structured ethical position paper free of grammatical errors.
Not applicable
10) Reference List
Provided up to five (5) references for the ethical position paper assignment.
Provided from six (6) to ten (10) references for the ethical position paper assignment.
Provided more than ten (10) references for the ethical position paper assignment.
Not applicable
TOTAL GRADE FROM A PERFECT SCORE OF 20
Evaluator’s Name: ________________________________
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523) Rubric for Ethical Position Paper – Written Assignment
Page 6 of 10
Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017
Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018
Evaluator’s Signature: _______________________________
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523) Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment
Page 7 of 10
Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017
Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018
Student Name:
Student ID:
Date:
Overall Grade:
Assessment Rubric:
ITEM POOR (0)
ACCEPTABLE (0.5)
IDEAL (1)
CLO STUDENT’S GRADE
1) Distinguishing the position of the protagonist (main character) in the scenario.
Did not distinguish the position of the protagonist (main character in the scenario).
Partially distinguished the position of the protagonist (main character in the scenario).
Comprehensively distinguished the position of the protagonist (main character in the scenario).
1.1
2) Identification of the ethical dimensions of the presenting case with respect to the protagonist (main character) in the scenario.
Failed to identify any of the ethical dimensions of the presenting case with respect to the protagonist (main character) in the scenario
Identified some of the ethical dimensions of the presenting case with respect to the protagonist (main character) in the scenario.
Completely identified all of the ethical dimensions of the presenting case with respect to the protagonist (main character) in the scenario.
1.1
3) Identification of the competing professional principles and values with respect to the
Did not identify the competing professional principles and values with respect to the protagonist (main
Partially identified some of the competing professional principles and values with respect to the
Thoroughly identified all of the competing professional principles and values with respect to the protagonist (main
1.2, 1.3
Assessment Task Assessment Score
□ Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment
10%
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523) Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment
Page 8 of 10
Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017
Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018
protagonist (main character) in the scenario.
character) in the scenario.
protagonist (main character) in the scenario.
character) in the scenario.
4) Distinguishing the position of at least one other professional in the scenario.
Failed to distinguish the position of at least one other professional in the scenario.
Partially distinguished the position of at least one other professional in the scenario.
Comprehensively distinguished the position of the at least one other professional in the scenario.
1.1
5) Analysis of the similarities and/or differences in the ethical principles which the other professional in the scenario would consider compared with the protagonist (main character).
Provided no analysis of the similarities and/or differences in the ethical principles which the other professional in the scenario would consider compared with the protagonist (main character).
Provided an analysis of either just the similarities or just the differences in the ethical principles which the other professional in the scenario would consider compared with the protagonist (main character).
Provided an analysis of both the similarities and differences in the ethical principles which the other professional in the scenario would consider compared with the protagonist (main character).
2.1
6) Utilization of a clearly identified ethical decision- making model to systematically explore the presenting situation.
Did not utilize a clearly identified ethical decision- making model to systematically explore the presenting situation.
Partially utilized a clearly identified ethical decision- making model to systematically explore the presenting situation.
Completely utilized a clearly identified ethical decision- making model to systematically explore the presenting situation.
2.3
7) Highlighting relevant steps
Failed to highlight the
Highlighted some of the
Highlighted all of the relevant steps of the
2.3
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523) Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment
Page 9 of 10
Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017
Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018
of the process involved in the identified ethical decision- making model utilized to systematically explore the presenting situation.
relevant steps of the process involved in the identified ethical decision- making model utilized to systematically explore the presenting situation.
relevant steps of the process involved in the identified ethical decision making model utilized to systematically explore the presenting situation.
process involved in the identified ethical decision-making model utilized to systematically explore the presenting situation.
8) Formulation of a justified final position consistent with professional practice
Did not formulate a justified final position consistent with professional practice.
Formulated a partially justified final position consistent with professional practice.
Formulated a comprehensively justified final position consistent with professional practice.
2.3
9) Composition of a well- structured, and grammatically correct ethical decision- making paper.
Composed a poorly structured ethical decision- making paper with numerous grammatical errors.
Composed a fairly- structured ethical decision- making paper with some grammatical errors.
Composed a well- structured ethical decision-making paper free of grammatical errors.
Not applicable
10) Reference List
Provided an insufficient number of references for the ethical decision- making paper assignment.
Provided a reasonably sufficient number of references for the ethical decision- making paper assignment.
Provided an extensive number of references for the ethical decision- making paper assignment.
Not applicable
TOTAL GRADE FROM A PERFECT SCORE OF 10
Evaluator’s Name: ________________________________
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education
University of Hail College of Nursing
المملكة العربية السعودية وزارة التعليم جامـعـة حـائل كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523) Rubric for Ethical Decision-making Paper – Written Assignment
Page 10 of 10
Accredited University by the ASIC on March 27, 2017
Accredited BSN Program by AHPGS on February 15, 2018
Evaluator’s Signature: _______________________________
