Client Report Assignment

profileDaRealMJ88
CaseStudyTeacherRecommendationsGradingRubric.docx

EDUC 622

Case Study: Teacher Recommendations Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 70%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Identifying Information

10 points

All of the following information is correctly completed.

· Student Name

· Teacher Name

· Date

· Progress Monitoring Level

8 to 9 points

Most of the following information is correctly completed.

· Student Name

· Teacher Name

· Date

· Progress Monitoring Level

1 to 7 points

Some of the following information is completed, and there are errors.

· Student Name

· Teacher Name

· Date

· Progress Monitoring Level

0 points

Not present

Visual Presentation

15 to 16 points

The graph is presented with the student’s name and date. The goal line and the data points are on the graph. The report is written in a visually professional way.

13 to 14 points

The graph is presented with the student’s name and date. The goal line and the data points are on the graph, but some of the data points are missing. Most areas of the report are presented in a visually professional way.

1 to 12 points

The graph is presented, but all of the information is not present. The goal line or the data points are not on the graph. The report is not written in a visually professional report.

0 points

Not present

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Paragraph Analysis

15 to 16 points

The teacher recommendations report is written in 2, clear paragraphs. All of the following information is included while using the student’s name throughout the report.

· Positive comments of the student’s abilities.

· Why the data was collected.

· How the data were collected and with what reading level.

· A statement of what the data should visually show in normal reading progression based on research.

· How the student’s data compares to normal reading progress and how this graph visualizes normal, at-risk, or above expectations reading performance.

· Recommendations for next steps in the student’s educational process.

13 to 14 points

The teacher recommendations report is written in 2 paragraphs. Most of the following information is included while using the student’s name throughout the report.

· Positive comments of the student’s abilities.

· Why the data was collected.

· How the data were collected and with what reading level.

· A statement of what the data should visually show in normal reading progression based on research.

· How the student’s data compares to normal reading progress and how this graph visualizes normal, at-risk, or above expectations reading performance.

· Recommendations for next steps in the student’s educational process.

1 to 12 points

The teacher recommendations is written in 1 paragraph. Some of the following information is included while using the student’s name throughout the report.

· Positive comments of the student’s abilities.

· Why the data was collected.

· How the data were collected and with what reading level.

· A statement of what the data should visually show in normal reading progression based on research.

· How the student’s data compares to normal reading progress and how this graph visualizes normal, at-risk, or above expectations reading performance.

· Recommendations for next steps in the student’s educational process.

0 points

Not present

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Structure 30%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Mechanics

9 points

The sentence structure is complete with correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and varied word choices. The report is no longer than 2 pages.

8 points

The sentence structure has minor errors (fragments, run-ons, subject-verb not parallel) with correct spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. There is some variation in word choices. The report is no longer than 2 pages.

1 to 7 points

The sentence structure has several errors in sentence fluency with multiple fragments/run-ons, poor spelling, and punctuation. There is limited variation in word choice. The report is too short due to missing information.

0 points

Not present

Formatting

9 points

The formatting of the report follows the template provided. All items are in the correct order.

8 points

The formatting of the report follows the template provided most of the time. Most of the items are in the correct order.

1 to 7 points

The formatting of the report does not follow the template provided. The items are not in the correct order.

0 points

Not present

Total

/60

Page 1 of 3