Help with case study

profilepatience_24
Casestudyrubric.pdf

Case Study Grading Rubric HSC 450

Objective/Criteria Performance Indicators

Excellent (20 points)

Very Good (17 points)

Satisfactory (15 points)

Minimally Responsive (11 point)

Un-acceptable (0 points)

1) Summarizes the context and content of case (Introduction)

Provides a very thorough, clear and concise summary of the case context and content.

Provides a clear and concise summary of the case context and content.

Provides a clear but less than concise summary, including some extraneous information.

Provides a somewhat muddled, unclear and rambling summary of the case.

No summary at all.

2) Identifies and describes the major problems of the case (Case Description)

Identifies and thoroughly describes multiple problems in the case; indicates relevant importance among the issues and explains why.

Identifies and clearly describes most of the major problems in the case with adequate discussion of the relevant importance of the issues.

Identifies one or more key problems of the case. Provides only a superficial discussion of the problems with no discussion of relevant importance.

Attempts to discuss issues, but fails to recognize any of the key problems of the case.

No description at all.

3) Provides an analysis of the case (Discussion and Evaluation)

Thorough analysis that addresses all questions in the case study.

Satisfactory analysis addresses all questions in the case study.

Adequate analysis of questions, may not address all questions adequately.

Fails to provide any meaningful analysis of the case

OR Analysis includes does not answer all questions in the case study.

No discussion of analysis at all

4) Sums up the main points of the case study.

Provides a very thorough, clear and concise conclusion of the salient points of the case context and content.

Provides a clear and concise conclusion of the case context and content.

Provides a clear but less than concise conclusion, including some extraneous information.

Provides a somewhat muddled, unclear and rambling conclusion of the case.

No conclusion at all

5) Grammar, mechanics, and APA style for references and citations

Consistently contains accurate and proper grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation.

Clearly and consistently uses proper APA formatting for citations and references Paper flows logically to convey ideas and is well- organized

Contains accurate and proper grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation most of the time; errors do not interfere with paper’s meaning.

Consistently uses APA formatting for citations and references.

Paper flows logically to convey ideas; is fairly well- organized.

Contains frequent errors in grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with reading the paper.

Inconsistently uses APA formatting for citations and references.

Paper is not always logical in its organization; flow is occasionally awkward and distracting to reader.

Contains numerous errors in grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation that substantially interfere with reading the paper.

Consistently fails to use APA formatting correctly for citations and references. Paper lacks logic in its organization; phrases and sentences are consistently awkward and writing is choppy.

No response