PMT 3.2 Case Study: Nightingale Project Gantt Chart

25 pts

Exemplary

Deliverables address all activity requirements.

17 pts

Proficient

Deliverables address most activity requirements.

14 pts

Marginal

Deliverables address some activity requirements.

11 pts

Weak

Deliverables address little activity requirements.

0 pts

No Credit

Missing

25 pts

Exemplary

Content of deliverables demonstrates clear comprehension and/or skilled application of all activity concepts.

17 pts

Proficient

Content of deliverables demonstrates clear comprehension and/or skilled application of most activity concepts.

14 pts

Marginal

Content of deliverables demonstrates clear comprehension and/or skilled application of some activity concepts.

11 pts

Weak

Content of deliverables provides little comprehension and/or skilled application of activity concepts.

0 pts

No Credit

Missing

25 pts

Exemplary

All responses include strong support for decisions such as logical, technically sound rationale or credible research.

17 pts

Proficient

Most responses include support for decisions such as logical, technically sound rationale or credible research.

14 pts

Marginal

Some responses include strong support for decisions such as logical, technically sound rationale or credible research.

11 pts

Weak

Only a few responses include strong support for decisions such as logical, technically sound rationale or credible research.

0 pts

No Credit

Missing

25 pts

Exemplary

All communication is clear, professional, and respectful.

17 pts

Proficient

Most communication is clear, professional, and respectful.

14 pts

Marginal

Some communication is clear, professional, and respectful.

11 pts

Weak

Only a little of the communication is clear, professional, and respectful.

0 pts

No Credit

Missing