Communication plan for Memo

profilekhurram703
CaseStudyPhase2.docx

Click the link above to submit your assignment.

Students, please view the "Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment" in the Student Center.

Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.

Case Study: National Infrastructure Protection Plan

Phase 1 due in Week 3

Phase 2 due in Week 5

On your first day as an Information Systems Security director, you met with the Chief Information Officer. During the meeting, he revealed to you his deep concerns about the Infrastructure Protection Plan. He asked you to read the Department of Homeland Security. (2009). National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Retrieved from http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/NIPP_Plan.pdf carefully and focus more on chapter 6: Ensuring an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term.

Since he realizes that you are new to this position he asked you to deliver the final plan, memo and budget in 7 weeks (week 8) but he setup 3 checkpoints for you to deliver parts of the plan to ensure consistent progress of the deliverables before the big presentation in week 8.

Phase 1: Memo - due in week 3

In this phase, you need to create 3 page professional memo about your assessment of what needs to be done to meet the standards based on the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. You need to make sure that the language in the memo is clear of free of errors. You also need to be creative in presenting this information to capture the most important points from the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. You need to demonstrate critical thinking to prioritize the action items based on your findings.

Phase 2: Communication plan - due in week 5

In this phase, you need to communicate with your troops about the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, through your information in the memo. The communication plan should involve a diagram showing the flow of information, the timing of the communication as well as the media of the communication. You also need to submit drafts of any communication pieces of your communication plan.

View the grading rubric.

Name: Week 5 Case Study Phase 2

Description: Week 5 Case Study Phase 2

 

Unacceptable Below 70% F

Fair 70-79% C

Proficient 80-89% B

Exemplary 90-100% A

CIS502-CS-1 1. Demonstrate the communication plan visually

Points Range:0 (0%) - 3.45 (13.8%)

Did not submit or incompletely demonstrated the communication plan visually

Points Range:3.5 (14%) - 3.95 (15.8%)

Partially demonstrated the communication plan visually

Points Range:4 (16%) - 4.45 (17.8%)

Satisfactorily demonstrated the communication plan visually

Points Range:4.5 (18%) - 5 (20%)

Thoroughly demonstrated the communication plan visually

CIS502-CS-2 2. Analyze how to manage risk

Points Range:0 (0%) - 3.45 (13.8%)

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how to manage risk

Points Range:3.5 (14%) - 3.95 (15.8%)

Partially analyzed how to manage risk

Points Range:4 (16%) - 4.45 (17.8%)

Satisfactorily analyzed how to manage risk

Points Range:4.5 (18%) - 5 (20%)

Thoroughly analyzed how to manage risk

CIS502-CS-3 3. Communicate how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission

Points Range:0 (0%) - 3.45 (13.8%)

Did not submit or incompletely communicated how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission

Points Range:3.5 (14%) - 3.95 (15.8%)

Partially communicated how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission

Points Range:4 (16%) - 4.45 (17.8%)

Satisfactorily communicated how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission

Points Range:4.5 (18%) - 5 (20%)

Thoroughly communicated how CIKR Protection is an essential part of the Homeland Security Mission

CIS502-CS-4 4. Ensure an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term

Points Range:0 (0%) - 4.31 (17.25%)

Did not submit or incompletely ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term

Points Range:4.38 (17.5%) - 4.94 (19.75%)

Partially ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term

Points Range:5 (20%) - 5.56 (22.25%)

Satisfactorily ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term

Points Range:5.62 (22.5%) - 6.25 (25%)

Thoroughly ensured an Effective, Efficient Program Over the Long Term

CIS502-CS-5 5. 3 references

Points Range:0 (0%) - .86 (3.45%)

No references provided

Points Range:.88 (3.5%) - .99 (3.95%)

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Points Range:1 (4%) - 1.11 (4.45%)

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Points Range:1.12 (4.5%) - 1.25 (5%)

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

CIS502-CS-6 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Points Range:0 (0%) - 1.72 (6.9%)

More than 6 errors present

Points Range:1.75 (7%) - 1.98 (7.9%)

5-6 errors present

Points Range:2 (8%) - 2.22 (8.9%)

3-4 errors present

Points Range:2.25 (9%) - 2.5 (10%)

0-2 errors present

Name:Week 5 Case Study Phase 2